Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-08-17DOI: 10.1177/14799731251358596
Jarkko Mäntylä, Witold Mazur, Tanja Törölä, Paula Reiterä, Paula Kauppi
BackgroundWe aimed to identify the risk factors associated with all-cause mortality in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (BE) patients in a Finnish cohort.MethodsIn this 4-years follow-up study, the data of non-cystic fibrosis adult BE patients were collected annually from medical records. Finnish translation of the disease-specific quality of life-bronchiectasis (QoL-B) questionnaire, the bronchiectasis severity index (BSI), FACED score, E-FACED score (exacerbations, (E), FEV1 (F), age (A), pulmonary bacterial colonization (C), number of lobes affected by BE (E), and dyspnoea (D), and modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnoea scale were used. Cox's regression analysis was used to evaluate factors with mortality.ResultsA total of 95 out of 205 adult non-cystic fibrosis BE patients were included and 79% of them were women with mean age of 69 years (SD ± 13). During the follow-up, eight patients died (8.4%). High scores of FACED (HR 1.9 CI 1.1-3.0), E-FACED (HR 1.5 CI 1.1-2.1) and mMRC (HR 3.2 CI 1.5-6.9) were increased the risk of mortality. The specific aetiology of BE, however, does not affect mortality. Low score of domains in QoL-B, physical (p < 0.01), vitality (p = 0.01), respiration (p = 0.03) and health (p < 0.01), were associated with mortality.ConclusionMultifactorial FACED and BSI scores increased the risk of mortality. In addition, mMRC which is a single patient reported variable was predictive for mortality. The simple mMRC scale could provide a valuable tool for clinical use.
背景:我们的目的是在芬兰队列中确定与非囊性纤维化支气管扩张(BE)患者全因死亡率相关的危险因素。方法在这项为期4年的随访研究中,每年从医疗记录中收集非囊性纤维化成人BE患者的数据。使用芬兰语翻译的疾病特异性生活质量-支气管扩张(QoL-B)问卷,支气管扩张严重程度指数(BSI), face评分,E- face评分(恶化,(E), FEV1 (F),年龄(A),肺细菌定植(C), BE影响的肺叶数(E)和呼吸困难(D),以及修订的医学研究委员会(mMRC)呼吸困难量表。采用Cox回归分析评价影响死亡率的因素。结果205例成人非囊性纤维化BE患者共纳入95例,其中79%为女性,平均年龄69岁(SD±13)。随访期间死亡8例(8.4%)。较高的face评分(HR 1.9 CI 1.1-3.0)、E-FACED评分(HR 1.5 CI 1.1-2.1)和mMRC评分(HR 3.2 CI 1.5-6.9)增加了死亡风险。然而,BE的具体病因并不影响死亡率。QoL-B、体力(p < 0.01)、活力(p = 0.01)、呼吸(p = 0.03)和健康(p < 0.01)的低评分域与死亡率相关。结论多因素的face和BSI评分增加了死亡风险。此外,单个患者报告的mMRC变量可预测死亡率。简单的mMRC量表可以为临床应用提供有价值的工具。
{"title":"Risk factors for mortality in Finnish bronchiectasis patients: A four-year study.","authors":"Jarkko Mäntylä, Witold Mazur, Tanja Törölä, Paula Reiterä, Paula Kauppi","doi":"10.1177/14799731251358596","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14799731251358596","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundWe aimed to identify the risk factors associated with all-cause mortality in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (BE) patients in a Finnish cohort.MethodsIn this 4-years follow-up study, the data of non-cystic fibrosis adult BE patients were collected annually from medical records. Finnish translation of the disease-specific quality of life-bronchiectasis (QoL-B) questionnaire, the bronchiectasis severity index (BSI), FACED score, E-FACED score (exacerbations, (E), FEV1 (F), age (A), pulmonary bacterial colonization (C), number of lobes affected by BE (E), and dyspnoea (D), and modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnoea scale were used. Cox's regression analysis was used to evaluate factors with mortality.ResultsA total of 95 out of 205 adult non-cystic fibrosis BE patients were included and 79% of them were women with mean age of 69 years (SD ± 13). During the follow-up, eight patients died (8.4%). High scores of FACED (HR 1.9 CI 1.1-3.0), E-FACED (HR 1.5 CI 1.1-2.1) and mMRC (HR 3.2 CI 1.5-6.9) were increased the risk of mortality. The specific aetiology of BE, however, does not affect mortality. Low score of domains in QoL-B, physical (<i>p</i> < 0.01), vitality (<i>p</i> = 0.01), respiration (<i>p</i> = 0.03) and health (<i>p</i> < 0.01), were associated with mortality.ConclusionMultifactorial FACED and BSI scores increased the risk of mortality. In addition, mMRC which is a single patient reported variable was predictive for mortality. The simple mMRC scale could provide a valuable tool for clinical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":10217,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Respiratory Disease","volume":"22 ","pages":"14799731251358596"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12361718/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144871665","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-06-05DOI: 10.1177/14799731251346191
Mario Castro, Kevin C Carney, Steven M Romanelli, Amy L Dixon, Maryam Q Abdul Rahman, Kavita Aggarwal, Barbara P Yawn
ObjectivesTreatment recommendations for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are based on single or combination long-acting bronchodilator therapy (β2-agonists [LABAs] or muscarinic receptor antagonists [LAMAs]), with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) for those at risk of exacerbations. This study evaluated differences in patient characteristics and treatment patterns among US clinicians.MethodsMedical record data for patients with COPD were abstracted via a retrospective cross-sectional survey by pulmonologists, internal/family medicine physicians, nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs).ResultsData on 700 patients were collected from 175 clinicians: 100 pulmonologists, 45 internal/family medicine physicians, 30 NP/PAs. Respondents classified patients as having Mild (11%), Moderate (51%), or Severe/Very Severe (38%) COPD, with highest perceived disease burden for patients with Severe/Very Severe COPD. Dual therapies were prescribed differently according to clinician type. Internal/family medicine physicians and NP/PAs prescribed LABA/ICS to a significantly higher proportion of patients than pulmonologists, who favored use of dual bronchodilator therapy. Regardless of clinician type, COPD management was complex, with patients starting and transitioning to multiple treatments throughout their care.ConclusionDifferences in COPD treatment patterns exist across US clinicians. Despite current maintenance treatment, COPD had a profound impact on patients, indicating a need for improved therapies for COPD.
{"title":"Differences in COPD management across clinician type: Maintenance treatment habits and patient characteristics among US pulmonologists, internal/family medicine physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants.","authors":"Mario Castro, Kevin C Carney, Steven M Romanelli, Amy L Dixon, Maryam Q Abdul Rahman, Kavita Aggarwal, Barbara P Yawn","doi":"10.1177/14799731251346191","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14799731251346191","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesTreatment recommendations for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are based on single or combination long-acting bronchodilator therapy (β<sub>2</sub>-agonists [LABAs] or muscarinic receptor antagonists [LAMAs]), with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) for those at risk of exacerbations. This study evaluated differences in patient characteristics and treatment patterns among US clinicians.MethodsMedical record data for patients with COPD were abstracted via a retrospective cross-sectional survey by pulmonologists, internal/family medicine physicians, nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs).ResultsData on 700 patients were collected from 175 clinicians: 100 pulmonologists, 45 internal/family medicine physicians, 30 NP/PAs. Respondents classified patients as having Mild (11%), Moderate (51%), or Severe/Very Severe (38%) COPD, with highest perceived disease burden for patients with Severe/Very Severe COPD. Dual therapies were prescribed differently according to clinician type. Internal/family medicine physicians and NP/PAs prescribed LABA/ICS to a significantly higher proportion of patients than pulmonologists, who favored use of dual bronchodilator therapy. Regardless of clinician type, COPD management was complex, with patients starting and transitioning to multiple treatments throughout their care.ConclusionDifferences in COPD treatment patterns exist across US clinicians. Despite current maintenance treatment, COPD had a profound impact on patients, indicating a need for improved therapies for COPD.</p>","PeriodicalId":10217,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Respiratory Disease","volume":"22 ","pages":"14799731251346191"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12141797/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144233368","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01DOI: 10.1177/14799731241258216
Humaira Hanif, Obaidullah Ahmed, James Manifield, Rubia Ishrat, Ilaria Pina, Zahira Ahmed, Mohd Shibli, Dominic Malcolm, Deepak Talwar, Sally J Singh, Mark W Orme
Objectives: Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR) is a high-impact intervention for individuals with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) but access is limited in India. PR barriers include distance to travel, lack of service provision and lack of healthcare professionals to deliver PR, thus it is disproportionate to the immense burden of IPF in India. We explored the lived experiences of people living with IPF, family caregivers (CGs) and healthcare workers (HCWs) as well as their views towards home-based PR (HBPR) in Delhi, India.
Methods: A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with individuals with IPF (n = 20), CGs (n = 10) and HCWs (n = 10) was conducted. Data were analysed using codebook thematic analysis.
Results: Three major themes were generated: (i) Health impact, which included pathophysiological changes, range of symptoms experienced, disease consequences and impact of comorbidities; (ii) Disease management, which described strategies to control the progression and overall management of IPF, such as medications and exercises; (iii) Mode of Pulmonary Rehabilitation, which described perceptions regarding HBPR, comparisons with centre-based programmes, and how HBPR may fit as part of a menu of PR delivery options.
Conclusion: People living with IPF, family caregivers and healthcare workers were positive about the potential implementation of HBPR and suggested the development of a paper-based manual to facilitate HBPR over digital/online approaches. The content of HBPR should be sensitive to the additional impact of non-IPF health issues and challenges of reduced interactions with healthcare professionals.
{"title":"Understanding the lived experience of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and how this shapes views on home-based pulmonary rehabilitation in Delhi, India.","authors":"Humaira Hanif, Obaidullah Ahmed, James Manifield, Rubia Ishrat, Ilaria Pina, Zahira Ahmed, Mohd Shibli, Dominic Malcolm, Deepak Talwar, Sally J Singh, Mark W Orme","doi":"10.1177/14799731241258216","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14799731241258216","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR) is a high-impact intervention for individuals with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) but access is limited in India. PR barriers include distance to travel, lack of service provision and lack of healthcare professionals to deliver PR, thus it is disproportionate to the immense burden of IPF in India. We explored the lived experiences of people living with IPF, family caregivers (CGs) and healthcare workers (HCWs) as well as their views towards home-based PR (HBPR) in Delhi, India.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with individuals with IPF (n = 20), CGs (n = 10) and HCWs (n = 10) was conducted. Data were analysed using codebook thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three major themes were generated: (i) Health impact, which included pathophysiological changes, range of symptoms experienced, disease consequences and impact of comorbidities; (ii) Disease management, which described strategies to control the progression and overall management of IPF, such as medications and exercises; (iii) Mode of Pulmonary Rehabilitation, which described perceptions regarding HBPR, comparisons with centre-based programmes, and how HBPR may fit as part of a menu of PR delivery options.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>People living with IPF, family caregivers and healthcare workers were positive about the potential implementation of HBPR and suggested the development of a paper-based manual to facilitate HBPR over digital/online approaches. The content of HBPR should be sensitive to the additional impact of non-IPF health issues and challenges of reduced interactions with healthcare professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":10217,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Respiratory Disease","volume":"21 ","pages":"14799731241258216"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11127573/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141086352","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01DOI: 10.1177/14799731241264789
Jennifer Harvey, Karen Ingram, George Edwards, Timothy O Jenkins, Gina Gardener, Suhani Patel, William D-C Man, Ruth E Barker
Background: Previous studies have focused on demographic factors that might predict non-completion of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR). We aimed to identify key modifiable factors that promote completion of PR. Methods: A mixed methods survey was offered to participants completing a discharge assessment following PR. Descriptive statistics and inductive thematic analysis were used to analyse the survey responses, with investigator triangulation. Results: 62 of 187 (33%) patients attending a PR discharge assessment between November 2022 and April 2023 returned the anonymised survey. Desire to improve health and wellbeing was the main reason for both initially committing to a course and for continuing with PR past transient thoughts of leaving. The positive impact of staff was the second most common reason. The enjoyment of the PR programme, being held accountable to attend classes, and the importance of other group members were other key themes identified. Conclusions: In conclusion, our findings suggest PR services need to implement strategies which ensure regular promotion and reinforcement of the health benefits of PR as well as implementation of PR modalities which best monopolise on the positive impact skilled staff have on motivating patients to complete PR.
{"title":"Motivations for completing pulmonary rehabilitation - A qualitative analysis.","authors":"Jennifer Harvey, Karen Ingram, George Edwards, Timothy O Jenkins, Gina Gardener, Suhani Patel, William D-C Man, Ruth E Barker","doi":"10.1177/14799731241264789","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14799731241264789","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Previous studies have focused on demographic factors that might predict non-completion of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR). We aimed to identify key modifiable factors that promote completion of PR. <b>Methods:</b> A mixed methods survey was offered to participants completing a discharge assessment following PR. Descriptive statistics and inductive thematic analysis were used to analyse the survey responses, with investigator triangulation. <b>Results:</b> 62 of 187 (33%) patients attending a PR discharge assessment between November 2022 and April 2023 returned the anonymised survey. Desire to improve health and wellbeing was the main reason for both initially committing to a course and for continuing with PR past transient thoughts of leaving. The positive impact of staff was the second most common reason. The enjoyment of the PR programme, being held accountable to attend classes, and the importance of other group members were other key themes identified. <b>Conclusions:</b> In conclusion, our findings suggest PR services need to implement strategies which ensure regular promotion and reinforcement of the health benefits of PR as well as implementation of PR modalities which best monopolise on the positive impact skilled staff have on motivating patients to complete PR.</p>","PeriodicalId":10217,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Respiratory Disease","volume":"21 ","pages":"14799731241264789"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11191621/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141431506","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01DOI: 10.1177/14799731241274785
Nikola M Stenzel, Nina Piel, Klaus Kenn, Michael Kreuter
Introduction: Multiple studies focusing on chronic lung diseases (i.e. COPD), have indicated that the quality of life (QoL) can be impacted by disease-related fears. In the context of Interstitial Lung Diseases (ILD), however, these have never been systematically examined. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to develop and evaluate an appropriate measuring tool, and to investigate the influence of disease-related anxieties on QoL in ILD.
Method: N = 166 ILD patients participated in the study and completed an itempool on disease-related fears, based on the COPD-Anxiety-Questionnaire (CAF-R) and expert assessments. Further, demographic and psychological variables were assessed (anxiety: GAD-7, QoL: K-BILD; Beliefs about Health: KKG). Psychometric properties were analyzed (factor structure, reliability, validity). Regression analyses were used to calculate the differential predictive power of disease-related anxieties on QoL.
Results: The factor structure was confirmed (Scales: Fear-of-Dependence-and-Progression, Fear-of-Social-Exclusion-and-Isolation, Fear-of-Physical-Activity, Fear-of-Dyspnea, and Sleep-related- Complaints). The Scales showed satisfying reliabilities (α = 0.68 to 0.89) and good validity. Disease-related anxieties proved to be differential predictors for different scales of the K-BILD (ß = -0.15 to ß = -0.58, all ps < .01).
Conclusions: The ILD-Anxiety-Questionnaire (IAQ) is an easy-to-use, valid measurement tool for assessing disease-related anxieties. These vary in their impact on different aspects of QoL. Therefore, it might aid in specifying the indication for potential psychological supplementary interventions. Additional long-term studies are required to investigate how specific anxieties affect both overall and condition-specific QoL in diverse situations.
引言多项针对慢性肺部疾病(如慢性阻塞性肺病)的研究表明,生活质量(QoL)会受到与疾病相关的恐惧的影响。然而,对于间质性肺病(ILD),这些研究还从未进行过系统的研究。因此,本研究旨在开发和评估一种适当的测量工具,并调查疾病相关焦虑对 ILD 患者 QoL 的影响:方法:166 名 ILD 患者参与了研究,并根据慢性阻塞性肺病焦虑问卷(CAF-R)和专家评估完成了与疾病相关的恐惧项目库。此外,还评估了人口统计学和心理变量(焦虑:GAD-7;QoL:K-BILD;健康信念:KKG)。对心理测量特性进行了分析(因子结构、信度、效度)。回归分析用于计算疾病相关焦虑对 QoL 的不同预测能力:结果:因子结构得到了证实(量表结果:因子结构得到确认(量表:害怕依赖和倒退、害怕社会排斥和孤立、害怕体力活动、害怕呼吸困难和与睡眠相关的抱怨)。量表显示出令人满意的信度(α = 0.68 至 0.89)和良好的效度。与疾病相关的焦虑被证明是K-BILD不同量表的不同预测因子(ß = -0.15 to ß = -0.58,所有PS < .01):ILD-焦虑问卷(IAQ)是一种易于使用、有效的测量工具,可用于评估与疾病相关的焦虑。这些焦虑对 QoL 不同方面的影响各不相同。因此,它可以帮助确定潜在心理辅助干预的适应症。还需要进行更多的长期研究,以调查特定的焦虑在不同情况下如何影响整体和特定疾病的 QoL。
{"title":"Development and initial validation of the ILD-Anxiety-Questionnaire (IAQ): A new instrument for assessing disease specific fears in interstitial lung disease.","authors":"Nikola M Stenzel, Nina Piel, Klaus Kenn, Michael Kreuter","doi":"10.1177/14799731241274785","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14799731241274785","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Multiple studies focusing on chronic lung diseases (i.e. COPD), have indicated that the quality of life (QoL) can be impacted by disease-related fears. In the context of Interstitial Lung Diseases (ILD), however, these have never been systematically examined. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to develop and evaluate an appropriate measuring tool, and to investigate the influence of disease-related anxieties on QoL in ILD.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong><i>N</i> = 166 ILD patients participated in the study and completed an itempool on disease-related fears, based on the COPD-Anxiety-Questionnaire (CAF-R) and expert assessments. Further, demographic and psychological variables were assessed (anxiety: GAD-7, QoL: K-BILD; Beliefs about Health: KKG). Psychometric properties were analyzed (factor structure, reliability, validity). Regression analyses were used to calculate the differential predictive power of disease-related anxieties on QoL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The factor structure was confirmed (Scales: Fear-of-Dependence-and-Progression, Fear-of-Social-Exclusion-and-Isolation, Fear-of-Physical-Activity, Fear-of-Dyspnea, and Sleep-related- Complaints). The Scales showed satisfying reliabilities (α = 0.68 to 0.89) and good validity. Disease-related anxieties proved to be differential predictors for different scales of the K-BILD (ß = -0.15 to ß = -0.58, all ps < .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ILD-Anxiety-Questionnaire (IAQ) is an easy-to-use, valid measurement tool for assessing disease-related anxieties. These vary in their impact on different aspects of QoL. Therefore, it might aid in specifying the indication for potential psychological supplementary interventions. Additional long-term studies are required to investigate how specific anxieties affect both overall and condition-specific QoL in diverse situations.</p>","PeriodicalId":10217,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Respiratory Disease","volume":"21 ","pages":"14799731241274785"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11364163/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142055111","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01DOI: 10.1177/14799731241291065
Annemarie L Lee, Stacey J Butler, Peter Jung, Imogen N Clark, Jeanette Tamplin, Roger S Goldstein, Dina Brooks
To evaluate the impact of participant-selected music listening as an adjunct to pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in people with COPD. Adults with COPD referred to PR were randomly assigned to participant-selected music listening (intervention group, [IG]) or usual care (control group [CG]) during an 8-weeks PR program. Prior to training, the IG completed an interview with a registered music therapist to identify music preferences. IG participants listened to an individualised playlist; CG participants had usual care. Primary outcomes included end-6-min walk test symptoms (dyspnoea and exertion) and dyspnoea (Multidimensional Dyspnoea Profile [MDP]), measured pre and post PR and 6-months follow-up. 58 participants, FEV1 52.4 (25.9)% pd) were recruited. There were no between-group differences following the intervention (p > .05 for all outcomes at all time points). Within-group differences following PR were significant for MDP sensory quality: IG mean difference [95% CI] -2.2 [-3.3 to -1.2]; CG -1.5 [-2.5 to -0.5] points; MDP emotional response: IG -3.2 [-4.2 to -2.3]; CG -2.2 [-3.2 to -1.3] points). Participant-selected music listening during PR offered no greater benefit to symptoms of dyspnoea or exertion compared to usual care. With the study limited by COVID-19 restrictions, the role of this adjunct remains to be clarified.
{"title":"Participant-selected music listening during pulmonary rehabilitation in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Annemarie L Lee, Stacey J Butler, Peter Jung, Imogen N Clark, Jeanette Tamplin, Roger S Goldstein, Dina Brooks","doi":"10.1177/14799731241291065","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14799731241291065","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To evaluate the impact of participant-selected music listening as an adjunct to pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in people with COPD. Adults with COPD referred to PR were randomly assigned to participant-selected music listening (intervention group, [IG]) or usual care (control group [CG]) during an 8-weeks PR program. Prior to training, the IG completed an interview with a registered music therapist to identify music preferences. IG participants listened to an individualised playlist; CG participants had usual care. Primary outcomes included end-6-min walk test symptoms (dyspnoea and exertion) and dyspnoea (Multidimensional Dyspnoea Profile [MDP]), measured pre and post PR and 6-months follow-up. 58 participants, FEV1 52.4 (25.9)% pd) were recruited. There were no between-group differences following the intervention (<i>p</i> > .05 for all outcomes at all time points). Within-group differences following PR were significant for MDP sensory quality: IG mean difference [95% CI] -2.2 [-3.3 to -1.2]; CG -1.5 [-2.5 to -0.5] points; MDP emotional response: IG -3.2 [-4.2 to -2.3]; CG -2.2 [-3.2 to -1.3] points). Participant-selected music listening during PR offered no greater benefit to symptoms of dyspnoea or exertion compared to usual care. With the study limited by COVID-19 restrictions, the role of this adjunct remains to be clarified.</p>","PeriodicalId":10217,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Respiratory Disease","volume":"21 ","pages":"14799731241291065"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11457285/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142379166","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01DOI: 10.1177/14799731241238428
A C Barradell,G Doe,H L Bekker,L Houchen-Wolloff,N Robertson,S J Singh
OBJECTIVESShared Decision Making (SDM) has potential to support Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR) decision-making when patients are offered a menu of centre- and home-based options. This study sought to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a three-component PR SDM intervention for individuals with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and PR healthcare professionals.METHODSParticipants were recruited from Dec 2021-Sep 2022. Healthcare professionals attended decision coaching training and used the consultation prompt during consultations. Individuals received the Patient Decision Aid (PtDA) at PR referral. Outcomes included recruitment capability, data completeness, intervention fidelity, and acceptability. Questionnaires assessed patient activation and decisional conflict pre and post-PR. Consultations were assessed using Observer OPTION-5. Optional interviews/focus groups were conducted.RESULTS13% of individuals [n = 31, 32% female, mean (SD) age 71.19 (7.50), median (IQR) MRC dyspnoea 3.50 (1.75)] and 100 % of healthcare professionals (n = 9, 78% female) were recruited. 28 (90.32%) of individuals completed all questionnaires. SDM was present in all consultations [standardised scores were mean (SD) = 36.97 (21.40)]. Six healthcare professionals and five individuals were interviewed. All felt consultations using the PtDA minimised healthcare professionals' bias of centre-based PR, increased individuals' self-awareness of their health, prompted consideration of how to improve it, and increased involvement in decision-making.DISCUSSIONResults indicate the study processes and SDM intervention is feasible and acceptable and can be delivered with fidelity when integrated into the PR pathway.
{"title":"A shared decision-making intervention for individuals living with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who are considering the menu of pulmonary rehabilitation treatment options; a feasibility study.","authors":"A C Barradell,G Doe,H L Bekker,L Houchen-Wolloff,N Robertson,S J Singh","doi":"10.1177/14799731241238428","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14799731241238428","url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVESShared Decision Making (SDM) has potential to support Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR) decision-making when patients are offered a menu of centre- and home-based options. This study sought to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a three-component PR SDM intervention for individuals with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and PR healthcare professionals.METHODSParticipants were recruited from Dec 2021-Sep 2022. Healthcare professionals attended decision coaching training and used the consultation prompt during consultations. Individuals received the Patient Decision Aid (PtDA) at PR referral. Outcomes included recruitment capability, data completeness, intervention fidelity, and acceptability. Questionnaires assessed patient activation and decisional conflict pre and post-PR. Consultations were assessed using Observer OPTION-5. Optional interviews/focus groups were conducted.RESULTS13% of individuals [n = 31, 32% female, mean (SD) age 71.19 (7.50), median (IQR) MRC dyspnoea 3.50 (1.75)] and 100 % of healthcare professionals (n = 9, 78% female) were recruited. 28 (90.32%) of individuals completed all questionnaires. SDM was present in all consultations [standardised scores were mean (SD) = 36.97 (21.40)]. Six healthcare professionals and five individuals were interviewed. All felt consultations using the PtDA minimised healthcare professionals' bias of centre-based PR, increased individuals' self-awareness of their health, prompted consideration of how to improve it, and increased involvement in decision-making.DISCUSSIONResults indicate the study processes and SDM intervention is feasible and acceptable and can be delivered with fidelity when integrated into the PR pathway.","PeriodicalId":10217,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Respiratory Disease","volume":"15 1","pages":"14799731241238428"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142179596","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01DOI: 10.1177/14799731241233301
Jun Su Park, Bomgyeol Kim, Yejin Kim, Sang Gyu Lee, Tae Hyun Kim
Objectives: Chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs) are a burden on both individuals and society. While previous literature has highlighted the clinical burden and total costs of care, it has not addressed patients' direct payments. This study aimed to estimate the incremental healthcare costs associated with patients with CRDs, specifically out-of-pocket (OOP) costs.
Methods: We used survey data from the 2019 Korea Health Panel Survey to estimate the total OOP costs of CRDs by comparing the annual hospitalizations, outpatient visits, emergency room visits, and medications of patients with and without CRDs. Generalized linear regression models controlled for differences in other characteristics between groups.
Results: We identified 222 patients with CRDs, of whom 166 were aged 65 years and older. Compared with the non-CRD group, CRD patients spent more on OOP costs (238.3 USD on average). Incremental costs were driven by outpatient visits and medications, which are subject to a coinsurance of 30% or more and may include items not covered by public insurance. Moreover, CRD patients aged 50-64 years incurred the highest incremental costs.
Discussion: The financial burden associated with CRDs is significant, and outpatient visits and medications constitute the largest components of OOP spending. Policymakers should introduce appropriate strategies to reduce CRD-associated burdens.
{"title":"Out-of-pocket costs associated with chronic respiratory diseases in Korean adults.","authors":"Jun Su Park, Bomgyeol Kim, Yejin Kim, Sang Gyu Lee, Tae Hyun Kim","doi":"10.1177/14799731241233301","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14799731241233301","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs) are a burden on both individuals and society. While previous literature has highlighted the clinical burden and total costs of care, it has not addressed patients' direct payments. This study aimed to estimate the incremental healthcare costs associated with patients with CRDs, specifically out-of-pocket (OOP) costs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used survey data from the 2019 Korea Health Panel Survey to estimate the total OOP costs of CRDs by comparing the annual hospitalizations, outpatient visits, emergency room visits, and medications of patients with and without CRDs. Generalized linear regression models controlled for differences in other characteristics between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 222 patients with CRDs, of whom 166 were aged 65 years and older. Compared with the non-CRD group, CRD patients spent more on OOP costs (238.3 USD on average). Incremental costs were driven by outpatient visits and medications, which are subject to a coinsurance of 30% or more and may include items not covered by public insurance. Moreover, CRD patients aged 50-64 years incurred the highest incremental costs.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The financial burden associated with CRDs is significant, and outpatient visits and medications constitute the largest components of OOP spending. Policymakers should introduce appropriate strategies to reduce CRD-associated burdens.</p>","PeriodicalId":10217,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Respiratory Disease","volume":"21 ","pages":"14799731241233301"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10893827/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139930292","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01DOI: 10.1177/14799731241240776
Rebecca F D'Cruz, Nicholas Hart
This state-of-the-art review provides an overview of the history of home mechanical ventilation (HMV), including early descriptions of mechanical ventilation from ancient and Renaissance perspectives and the mass development of ventilators designed for long-term use during the poliomyelitis epidemic. Seminal data from key clinical trials supports the application of HMV in certain patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, neuromuscular disease and obesity-related respiratory failure. Innovative engineering coupled with refined physiological understanding now permits widespread delivery of home mechanical ventilation to a global population, using portable devices with advanced ventilatory modes and telemonitoring capabilities. Exponential growth in digital technology continues, and ongoing research is needed to understand how to harness clinical and physiological data to benefit patients and healthcare services in a clinically- and cost-effective manner.
{"title":"A history of home mechanical ventilation: The past, present and future.","authors":"Rebecca F D'Cruz, Nicholas Hart","doi":"10.1177/14799731241240776","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14799731241240776","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This state-of-the-art review provides an overview of the history of home mechanical ventilation (HMV), including early descriptions of mechanical ventilation from ancient and Renaissance perspectives and the mass development of ventilators designed for long-term use during the poliomyelitis epidemic. Seminal data from key clinical trials supports the application of HMV in certain patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, neuromuscular disease and obesity-related respiratory failure. Innovative engineering coupled with refined physiological understanding now permits widespread delivery of home mechanical ventilation to a global population, using portable devices with advanced ventilatory modes and telemonitoring capabilities. Exponential growth in digital technology continues, and ongoing research is needed to understand how to harness clinical and physiological data to benefit patients and healthcare services in a clinically- and cost-effective manner.</p>","PeriodicalId":10217,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Respiratory Disease","volume":"21 ","pages":"14799731241240776"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10958804/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140173962","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}