首页 > 最新文献

Chronic Respiratory Disease最新文献

英文 中文
Risk factors for mortality in Finnish bronchiectasis patients: A four-year study. 芬兰支气管扩张患者死亡率的危险因素:一项为期四年的研究。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-17 DOI: 10.1177/14799731251358596
Jarkko Mäntylä, Witold Mazur, Tanja Törölä, Paula Reiterä, Paula Kauppi

BackgroundWe aimed to identify the risk factors associated with all-cause mortality in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (BE) patients in a Finnish cohort.MethodsIn this 4-years follow-up study, the data of non-cystic fibrosis adult BE patients were collected annually from medical records. Finnish translation of the disease-specific quality of life-bronchiectasis (QoL-B) questionnaire, the bronchiectasis severity index (BSI), FACED score, E-FACED score (exacerbations, (E), FEV1 (F), age (A), pulmonary bacterial colonization (C), number of lobes affected by BE (E), and dyspnoea (D), and modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnoea scale were used. Cox's regression analysis was used to evaluate factors with mortality.ResultsA total of 95 out of 205 adult non-cystic fibrosis BE patients were included and 79% of them were women with mean age of 69 years (SD ± 13). During the follow-up, eight patients died (8.4%). High scores of FACED (HR 1.9 CI 1.1-3.0), E-FACED (HR 1.5 CI 1.1-2.1) and mMRC (HR 3.2 CI 1.5-6.9) were increased the risk of mortality. The specific aetiology of BE, however, does not affect mortality. Low score of domains in QoL-B, physical (p < 0.01), vitality (p = 0.01), respiration (p = 0.03) and health (p < 0.01), were associated with mortality.ConclusionMultifactorial FACED and BSI scores increased the risk of mortality. In addition, mMRC which is a single patient reported variable was predictive for mortality. The simple mMRC scale could provide a valuable tool for clinical use.

背景:我们的目的是在芬兰队列中确定与非囊性纤维化支气管扩张(BE)患者全因死亡率相关的危险因素。方法在这项为期4年的随访研究中,每年从医疗记录中收集非囊性纤维化成人BE患者的数据。使用芬兰语翻译的疾病特异性生活质量-支气管扩张(QoL-B)问卷,支气管扩张严重程度指数(BSI), face评分,E- face评分(恶化,(E), FEV1 (F),年龄(A),肺细菌定植(C), BE影响的肺叶数(E)和呼吸困难(D),以及修订的医学研究委员会(mMRC)呼吸困难量表。采用Cox回归分析评价影响死亡率的因素。结果205例成人非囊性纤维化BE患者共纳入95例,其中79%为女性,平均年龄69岁(SD±13)。随访期间死亡8例(8.4%)。较高的face评分(HR 1.9 CI 1.1-3.0)、E-FACED评分(HR 1.5 CI 1.1-2.1)和mMRC评分(HR 3.2 CI 1.5-6.9)增加了死亡风险。然而,BE的具体病因并不影响死亡率。QoL-B、体力(p < 0.01)、活力(p = 0.01)、呼吸(p = 0.03)和健康(p < 0.01)的低评分域与死亡率相关。结论多因素的face和BSI评分增加了死亡风险。此外,单个患者报告的mMRC变量可预测死亡率。简单的mMRC量表可以为临床应用提供有价值的工具。
{"title":"Risk factors for mortality in Finnish bronchiectasis patients: A four-year study.","authors":"Jarkko Mäntylä, Witold Mazur, Tanja Törölä, Paula Reiterä, Paula Kauppi","doi":"10.1177/14799731251358596","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14799731251358596","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundWe aimed to identify the risk factors associated with all-cause mortality in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (BE) patients in a Finnish cohort.MethodsIn this 4-years follow-up study, the data of non-cystic fibrosis adult BE patients were collected annually from medical records. Finnish translation of the disease-specific quality of life-bronchiectasis (QoL-B) questionnaire, the bronchiectasis severity index (BSI), FACED score, E-FACED score (exacerbations, (E), FEV1 (F), age (A), pulmonary bacterial colonization (C), number of lobes affected by BE (E), and dyspnoea (D), and modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnoea scale were used. Cox's regression analysis was used to evaluate factors with mortality.ResultsA total of 95 out of 205 adult non-cystic fibrosis BE patients were included and 79% of them were women with mean age of 69 years (SD ± 13). During the follow-up, eight patients died (8.4%). High scores of FACED (HR 1.9 CI 1.1-3.0), E-FACED (HR 1.5 CI 1.1-2.1) and mMRC (HR 3.2 CI 1.5-6.9) were increased the risk of mortality. The specific aetiology of BE, however, does not affect mortality. Low score of domains in QoL-B, physical (<i>p</i> < 0.01), vitality (<i>p</i> = 0.01), respiration (<i>p</i> = 0.03) and health (<i>p</i> < 0.01), were associated with mortality.ConclusionMultifactorial FACED and BSI scores increased the risk of mortality. In addition, mMRC which is a single patient reported variable was predictive for mortality. The simple mMRC scale could provide a valuable tool for clinical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":10217,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Respiratory Disease","volume":"22 ","pages":"14799731251358596"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12361718/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144871665","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Differences in COPD management across clinician type: Maintenance treatment habits and patient characteristics among US pulmonologists, internal/family medicine physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants. 不同临床医生类型COPD管理的差异:美国肺科医生、内科/家庭医学医生、执业护士和医师助理的维持治疗习惯和患者特征。
IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-05 DOI: 10.1177/14799731251346191
Mario Castro, Kevin C Carney, Steven M Romanelli, Amy L Dixon, Maryam Q Abdul Rahman, Kavita Aggarwal, Barbara P Yawn

ObjectivesTreatment recommendations for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are based on single or combination long-acting bronchodilator therapy (β2-agonists [LABAs] or muscarinic receptor antagonists [LAMAs]), with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) for those at risk of exacerbations. This study evaluated differences in patient characteristics and treatment patterns among US clinicians.MethodsMedical record data for patients with COPD were abstracted via a retrospective cross-sectional survey by pulmonologists, internal/family medicine physicians, nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs).ResultsData on 700 patients were collected from 175 clinicians: 100 pulmonologists, 45 internal/family medicine physicians, 30 NP/PAs. Respondents classified patients as having Mild (11%), Moderate (51%), or Severe/Very Severe (38%) COPD, with highest perceived disease burden for patients with Severe/Very Severe COPD. Dual therapies were prescribed differently according to clinician type. Internal/family medicine physicians and NP/PAs prescribed LABA/ICS to a significantly higher proportion of patients than pulmonologists, who favored use of dual bronchodilator therapy. Regardless of clinician type, COPD management was complex, with patients starting and transitioning to multiple treatments throughout their care.ConclusionDifferences in COPD treatment patterns exist across US clinicians. Despite current maintenance treatment, COPD had a profound impact on patients, indicating a need for improved therapies for COPD.

慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的治疗建议是基于单一或联合长效支气管扩张剂治疗(β2激动剂[LABAs]或毒蕈碱受体拮抗剂[LAMAs]),并对有恶化风险的患者使用吸入皮质类固醇(ICS)。本研究评估了美国临床医生在患者特征和治疗模式上的差异。方法通过回顾性横断面调查抽取COPD患者的病历资料,调查对象包括肺科医生、内科/家庭医学医生、执业护士(NPs)和医师助理(PAs)。结果来自175名临床医生的700例患者的数据:100名肺科医生,45名内科/家庭医学医生,30名NP/PAs。受访者将患者分为轻度(11%)、中度(51%)或重度/极重度(38%)COPD,重度/极重度COPD患者的疾病负担最高。根据临床医生类型,采用不同的双重治疗方法。内科/家庭医学医生和NP/PAs给患者开LABA/ICS的比例明显高于支持使用双支气管扩张剂治疗的肺科医生。无论临床医生类型如何,COPD的管理都是复杂的,患者在整个治疗过程中开始和过渡到多种治疗。结论:美国临床医生COPD治疗模式存在差异。尽管目前的维持治疗,COPD对患者有深远的影响,表明需要改进COPD的治疗方法。
{"title":"Differences in COPD management across clinician type: Maintenance treatment habits and patient characteristics among US pulmonologists, internal/family medicine physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants.","authors":"Mario Castro, Kevin C Carney, Steven M Romanelli, Amy L Dixon, Maryam Q Abdul Rahman, Kavita Aggarwal, Barbara P Yawn","doi":"10.1177/14799731251346191","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14799731251346191","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesTreatment recommendations for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are based on single or combination long-acting bronchodilator therapy (β<sub>2</sub>-agonists [LABAs] or muscarinic receptor antagonists [LAMAs]), with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) for those at risk of exacerbations. This study evaluated differences in patient characteristics and treatment patterns among US clinicians.MethodsMedical record data for patients with COPD were abstracted via a retrospective cross-sectional survey by pulmonologists, internal/family medicine physicians, nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs).ResultsData on 700 patients were collected from 175 clinicians: 100 pulmonologists, 45 internal/family medicine physicians, 30 NP/PAs. Respondents classified patients as having Mild (11%), Moderate (51%), or Severe/Very Severe (38%) COPD, with highest perceived disease burden for patients with Severe/Very Severe COPD. Dual therapies were prescribed differently according to clinician type. Internal/family medicine physicians and NP/PAs prescribed LABA/ICS to a significantly higher proportion of patients than pulmonologists, who favored use of dual bronchodilator therapy. Regardless of clinician type, COPD management was complex, with patients starting and transitioning to multiple treatments throughout their care.ConclusionDifferences in COPD treatment patterns exist across US clinicians. Despite current maintenance treatment, COPD had a profound impact on patients, indicating a need for improved therapies for COPD.</p>","PeriodicalId":10217,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Respiratory Disease","volume":"22 ","pages":"14799731251346191"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12141797/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144233368","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Understanding the lived experience of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and how this shapes views on home-based pulmonary rehabilitation in Delhi, India. 了解印度德里特发性肺纤维化患者的生活经历,以及这种经历如何影响人们对家庭肺康复的看法。
IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/14799731241258216
Humaira Hanif, Obaidullah Ahmed, James Manifield, Rubia Ishrat, Ilaria Pina, Zahira Ahmed, Mohd Shibli, Dominic Malcolm, Deepak Talwar, Sally J Singh, Mark W Orme

Objectives: Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR) is a high-impact intervention for individuals with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) but access is limited in India. PR barriers include distance to travel, lack of service provision and lack of healthcare professionals to deliver PR, thus it is disproportionate to the immense burden of IPF in India. We explored the lived experiences of people living with IPF, family caregivers (CGs) and healthcare workers (HCWs) as well as their views towards home-based PR (HBPR) in Delhi, India.

Methods: A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with individuals with IPF (n = 20), CGs (n = 10) and HCWs (n = 10) was conducted. Data were analysed using codebook thematic analysis.

Results: Three major themes were generated: (i) Health impact, which included pathophysiological changes, range of symptoms experienced, disease consequences and impact of comorbidities; (ii) Disease management, which described strategies to control the progression and overall management of IPF, such as medications and exercises; (iii) Mode of Pulmonary Rehabilitation, which described perceptions regarding HBPR, comparisons with centre-based programmes, and how HBPR may fit as part of a menu of PR delivery options.

Conclusion: People living with IPF, family caregivers and healthcare workers were positive about the potential implementation of HBPR and suggested the development of a paper-based manual to facilitate HBPR over digital/online approaches. The content of HBPR should be sensitive to the additional impact of non-IPF health issues and challenges of reduced interactions with healthcare professionals.

目的:肺康复(PR)是针对特发性肺纤维化(IPF)患者的一种高效干预措施,但在印度却很有限。肺康复的障碍包括路途遥远、缺乏服务和提供肺康复服务的医疗保健专业人员,因此与印度 IPF 的巨大负担不成比例。我们探讨了印度德里的 IPF 患者、家庭照顾者 (CG) 和医护人员 (HCW) 的生活经历以及他们对居家 PR (HBPR) 的看法:采用半结构式访谈法对 IPF 患者(20 人)、CG(10 人)和医护人员(10 人)进行了定性研究。采用编码本主题分析法对数据进行分析:结果:产生了三大主题:(i) 健康影响,包括病理生理变化、所经历的症状范围、疾病后果和合并症的影响;(ii) 疾病管理,描述了控制 IPF 进展和整体管理的策略,如药物和锻炼;(iii) 肺康复模式,描述了对 HBPR 的看法、与基于中心的计划的比较,以及 HBPR 如何作为 PR 交付选项菜单的一部分:IPF 患者、家庭护理人员和医护人员对 HBPR 的潜在实施持积极态度,并建议开发纸质手册,以促进 HBPR 而非数字/在线方法的实施。HBPR 的内容应考虑到非 IPF 健康问题的额外影响以及与医护人员互动减少所带来的挑战。
{"title":"Understanding the lived experience of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and how this shapes views on home-based pulmonary rehabilitation in Delhi, India.","authors":"Humaira Hanif, Obaidullah Ahmed, James Manifield, Rubia Ishrat, Ilaria Pina, Zahira Ahmed, Mohd Shibli, Dominic Malcolm, Deepak Talwar, Sally J Singh, Mark W Orme","doi":"10.1177/14799731241258216","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14799731241258216","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR) is a high-impact intervention for individuals with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) but access is limited in India. PR barriers include distance to travel, lack of service provision and lack of healthcare professionals to deliver PR, thus it is disproportionate to the immense burden of IPF in India. We explored the lived experiences of people living with IPF, family caregivers (CGs) and healthcare workers (HCWs) as well as their views towards home-based PR (HBPR) in Delhi, India.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with individuals with IPF (n = 20), CGs (n = 10) and HCWs (n = 10) was conducted. Data were analysed using codebook thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three major themes were generated: (i) Health impact, which included pathophysiological changes, range of symptoms experienced, disease consequences and impact of comorbidities; (ii) Disease management, which described strategies to control the progression and overall management of IPF, such as medications and exercises; (iii) Mode of Pulmonary Rehabilitation, which described perceptions regarding HBPR, comparisons with centre-based programmes, and how HBPR may fit as part of a menu of PR delivery options.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>People living with IPF, family caregivers and healthcare workers were positive about the potential implementation of HBPR and suggested the development of a paper-based manual to facilitate HBPR over digital/online approaches. The content of HBPR should be sensitive to the additional impact of non-IPF health issues and challenges of reduced interactions with healthcare professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":10217,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Respiratory Disease","volume":"21 ","pages":"14799731241258216"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11127573/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141086352","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Motivations for completing pulmonary rehabilitation - A qualitative analysis. 完成肺康复的动机--定性分析。
IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/14799731241264789
Jennifer Harvey, Karen Ingram, George Edwards, Timothy O Jenkins, Gina Gardener, Suhani Patel, William D-C Man, Ruth E Barker

Background: Previous studies have focused on demographic factors that might predict non-completion of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR). We aimed to identify key modifiable factors that promote completion of PR. Methods: A mixed methods survey was offered to participants completing a discharge assessment following PR. Descriptive statistics and inductive thematic analysis were used to analyse the survey responses, with investigator triangulation. Results: 62 of 187 (33%) patients attending a PR discharge assessment between November 2022 and April 2023 returned the anonymised survey. Desire to improve health and wellbeing was the main reason for both initially committing to a course and for continuing with PR past transient thoughts of leaving. The positive impact of staff was the second most common reason. The enjoyment of the PR programme, being held accountable to attend classes, and the importance of other group members were other key themes identified. Conclusions: In conclusion, our findings suggest PR services need to implement strategies which ensure regular promotion and reinforcement of the health benefits of PR as well as implementation of PR modalities which best monopolise on the positive impact skilled staff have on motivating patients to complete PR.

背景:以前的研究主要关注可能预测未完成肺康复(PR)的人口统计学因素。我们的目的是找出促进完成肺康复的关键可改变因素。研究方法我们向完成肺康复后出院评估的参与者提供了一项混合方法调查。采用描述性统计和归纳主题分析法对调查回答进行分析,并对调查者进行三角测量。结果在 2022 年 11 月至 2023 年 4 月期间参加 PR 出院评估的 187 名患者中,有 62 人(33%)返回了匿名调查问卷。希望改善健康和福祉是最初承诺参加课程以及在短暂的离开想法之后继续参加 PR 的主要原因。员工的积极影响是第二个最常见的原因。PR 课程的乐趣、参加课程的责任感以及其他小组成员的重要性也是其他主要原因。结论:总之,我们的研究结果表明,公共关系服务需要实施相应的策略,确保定期宣传和强化公共关系对健康的益处,并实施最能充分发挥技术熟练的工作人员对激励患者完成公共关系的积极影响的公共关系模式。
{"title":"Motivations for completing pulmonary rehabilitation - A qualitative analysis.","authors":"Jennifer Harvey, Karen Ingram, George Edwards, Timothy O Jenkins, Gina Gardener, Suhani Patel, William D-C Man, Ruth E Barker","doi":"10.1177/14799731241264789","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14799731241264789","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Previous studies have focused on demographic factors that might predict non-completion of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR). We aimed to identify key modifiable factors that promote completion of PR. <b>Methods:</b> A mixed methods survey was offered to participants completing a discharge assessment following PR. Descriptive statistics and inductive thematic analysis were used to analyse the survey responses, with investigator triangulation. <b>Results:</b> 62 of 187 (33%) patients attending a PR discharge assessment between November 2022 and April 2023 returned the anonymised survey. Desire to improve health and wellbeing was the main reason for both initially committing to a course and for continuing with PR past transient thoughts of leaving. The positive impact of staff was the second most common reason. The enjoyment of the PR programme, being held accountable to attend classes, and the importance of other group members were other key themes identified. <b>Conclusions:</b> In conclusion, our findings suggest PR services need to implement strategies which ensure regular promotion and reinforcement of the health benefits of PR as well as implementation of PR modalities which best monopolise on the positive impact skilled staff have on motivating patients to complete PR.</p>","PeriodicalId":10217,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Respiratory Disease","volume":"21 ","pages":"14799731241264789"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11191621/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141431506","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Development and initial validation of the ILD-Anxiety-Questionnaire (IAQ): A new instrument for assessing disease specific fears in interstitial lung disease. 间质性肺病焦虑问卷(IAQ)的开发和初步验证:用于评估间质性肺病特定疾病恐惧的新工具。
IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/14799731241274785
Nikola M Stenzel, Nina Piel, Klaus Kenn, Michael Kreuter

Introduction: Multiple studies focusing on chronic lung diseases (i.e. COPD), have indicated that the quality of life (QoL) can be impacted by disease-related fears. In the context of Interstitial Lung Diseases (ILD), however, these have never been systematically examined. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to develop and evaluate an appropriate measuring tool, and to investigate the influence of disease-related anxieties on QoL in ILD.

Method: N = 166 ILD patients participated in the study and completed an itempool on disease-related fears, based on the COPD-Anxiety-Questionnaire (CAF-R) and expert assessments. Further, demographic and psychological variables were assessed (anxiety: GAD-7, QoL: K-BILD; Beliefs about Health: KKG). Psychometric properties were analyzed (factor structure, reliability, validity). Regression analyses were used to calculate the differential predictive power of disease-related anxieties on QoL.

Results: The factor structure was confirmed (Scales: Fear-of-Dependence-and-Progression, Fear-of-Social-Exclusion-and-Isolation, Fear-of-Physical-Activity, Fear-of-Dyspnea, and Sleep-related- Complaints). The Scales showed satisfying reliabilities (α = 0.68 to 0.89) and good validity. Disease-related anxieties proved to be differential predictors for different scales of the K-BILD (ß = -0.15 to ß = -0.58, all ps < .01).

Conclusions: The ILD-Anxiety-Questionnaire (IAQ) is an easy-to-use, valid measurement tool for assessing disease-related anxieties. These vary in their impact on different aspects of QoL. Therefore, it might aid in specifying the indication for potential psychological supplementary interventions. Additional long-term studies are required to investigate how specific anxieties affect both overall and condition-specific QoL in diverse situations.

引言多项针对慢性肺部疾病(如慢性阻塞性肺病)的研究表明,生活质量(QoL)会受到与疾病相关的恐惧的影响。然而,对于间质性肺病(ILD),这些研究还从未进行过系统的研究。因此,本研究旨在开发和评估一种适当的测量工具,并调查疾病相关焦虑对 ILD 患者 QoL 的影响:方法:166 名 ILD 患者参与了研究,并根据慢性阻塞性肺病焦虑问卷(CAF-R)和专家评估完成了与疾病相关的恐惧项目库。此外,还评估了人口统计学和心理变量(焦虑:GAD-7;QoL:K-BILD;健康信念:KKG)。对心理测量特性进行了分析(因子结构、信度、效度)。回归分析用于计算疾病相关焦虑对 QoL 的不同预测能力:结果:因子结构得到了证实(量表结果:因子结构得到确认(量表:害怕依赖和倒退、害怕社会排斥和孤立、害怕体力活动、害怕呼吸困难和与睡眠相关的抱怨)。量表显示出令人满意的信度(α = 0.68 至 0.89)和良好的效度。与疾病相关的焦虑被证明是K-BILD不同量表的不同预测因子(ß = -0.15 to ß = -0.58,所有PS < .01):ILD-焦虑问卷(IAQ)是一种易于使用、有效的测量工具,可用于评估与疾病相关的焦虑。这些焦虑对 QoL 不同方面的影响各不相同。因此,它可以帮助确定潜在心理辅助干预的适应症。还需要进行更多的长期研究,以调查特定的焦虑在不同情况下如何影响整体和特定疾病的 QoL。
{"title":"Development and initial validation of the ILD-Anxiety-Questionnaire (IAQ): A new instrument for assessing disease specific fears in interstitial lung disease.","authors":"Nikola M Stenzel, Nina Piel, Klaus Kenn, Michael Kreuter","doi":"10.1177/14799731241274785","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14799731241274785","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Multiple studies focusing on chronic lung diseases (i.e. COPD), have indicated that the quality of life (QoL) can be impacted by disease-related fears. In the context of Interstitial Lung Diseases (ILD), however, these have never been systematically examined. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to develop and evaluate an appropriate measuring tool, and to investigate the influence of disease-related anxieties on QoL in ILD.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong><i>N</i> = 166 ILD patients participated in the study and completed an itempool on disease-related fears, based on the COPD-Anxiety-Questionnaire (CAF-R) and expert assessments. Further, demographic and psychological variables were assessed (anxiety: GAD-7, QoL: K-BILD; Beliefs about Health: KKG). Psychometric properties were analyzed (factor structure, reliability, validity). Regression analyses were used to calculate the differential predictive power of disease-related anxieties on QoL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The factor structure was confirmed (Scales: Fear-of-Dependence-and-Progression, Fear-of-Social-Exclusion-and-Isolation, Fear-of-Physical-Activity, Fear-of-Dyspnea, and Sleep-related- Complaints). The Scales showed satisfying reliabilities (α = 0.68 to 0.89) and good validity. Disease-related anxieties proved to be differential predictors for different scales of the K-BILD (ß = -0.15 to ß = -0.58, all ps < .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ILD-Anxiety-Questionnaire (IAQ) is an easy-to-use, valid measurement tool for assessing disease-related anxieties. These vary in their impact on different aspects of QoL. Therefore, it might aid in specifying the indication for potential psychological supplementary interventions. Additional long-term studies are required to investigate how specific anxieties affect both overall and condition-specific QoL in diverse situations.</p>","PeriodicalId":10217,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Respiratory Disease","volume":"21 ","pages":"14799731241274785"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11364163/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142055111","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Participant-selected music listening during pulmonary rehabilitation in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A randomised controlled trial. 慢性阻塞性肺病患者在肺康复期间聆听由参与者选择的音乐:随机对照试验。
IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/14799731241291065
Annemarie L Lee, Stacey J Butler, Peter Jung, Imogen N Clark, Jeanette Tamplin, Roger S Goldstein, Dina Brooks

To evaluate the impact of participant-selected music listening as an adjunct to pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in people with COPD. Adults with COPD referred to PR were randomly assigned to participant-selected music listening (intervention group, [IG]) or usual care (control group [CG]) during an 8-weeks PR program. Prior to training, the IG completed an interview with a registered music therapist to identify music preferences. IG participants listened to an individualised playlist; CG participants had usual care. Primary outcomes included end-6-min walk test symptoms (dyspnoea and exertion) and dyspnoea (Multidimensional Dyspnoea Profile [MDP]), measured pre and post PR and 6-months follow-up. 58 participants, FEV1 52.4 (25.9)% pd) were recruited. There were no between-group differences following the intervention (p > .05 for all outcomes at all time points). Within-group differences following PR were significant for MDP sensory quality: IG mean difference [95% CI] -2.2 [-3.3 to -1.2]; CG -1.5 [-2.5 to -0.5] points; MDP emotional response: IG -3.2 [-4.2 to -2.3]; CG -2.2 [-3.2 to -1.3] points). Participant-selected music listening during PR offered no greater benefit to symptoms of dyspnoea or exertion compared to usual care. With the study limited by COVID-19 restrictions, the role of this adjunct remains to be clarified.

目的:评估参与者自选音乐聆听作为慢性阻塞性肺病患者肺康复(PR)辅助疗法的影响。在为期 8 周的肺康复计划中,被转介到肺康复计划的慢性阻塞性肺病成人被随机分配到参与者自选音乐聆听组(干预组 [IG])或常规护理组(对照组 [CG])。在培训之前,干预组完成了与注册音乐治疗师的访谈,以确定音乐偏好。IG 参与者聆听个性化播放列表;CG 参与者接受常规护理。主要结果包括 6 分钟步行终点测试症状(呼吸困难和用力)和呼吸困难(多维呼吸困难档案 [MDP]),在 PR 前后和 6 个月的随访中进行测量。共招募了 58 名参与者(FEV1 52.4 (25.9)% pd)。干预后无组间差异(所有时间点所有结果的 p > .05)。在 MDP 感觉质量方面,PR 后的组内差异显著:IG 平均差异 [95% CI] -2.2 [-3.3 to -1.2]; CG -1.5 [-2.5 to -0.5] 分;MDP 情绪反应:IG-3.2[-4.2至-2.3];CG-2.2[-3.2至-1.3]分)。与常规护理相比,参与者在 PR 期间选择听音乐对呼吸困难或劳累症状并无更大益处。由于该研究受到 COVID-19 的限制,该辅助疗法的作用仍有待明确。
{"title":"Participant-selected music listening during pulmonary rehabilitation in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Annemarie L Lee, Stacey J Butler, Peter Jung, Imogen N Clark, Jeanette Tamplin, Roger S Goldstein, Dina Brooks","doi":"10.1177/14799731241291065","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14799731241291065","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To evaluate the impact of participant-selected music listening as an adjunct to pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in people with COPD. Adults with COPD referred to PR were randomly assigned to participant-selected music listening (intervention group, [IG]) or usual care (control group [CG]) during an 8-weeks PR program. Prior to training, the IG completed an interview with a registered music therapist to identify music preferences. IG participants listened to an individualised playlist; CG participants had usual care. Primary outcomes included end-6-min walk test symptoms (dyspnoea and exertion) and dyspnoea (Multidimensional Dyspnoea Profile [MDP]), measured pre and post PR and 6-months follow-up. 58 participants, FEV1 52.4 (25.9)% pd) were recruited. There were no between-group differences following the intervention (<i>p</i> > .05 for all outcomes at all time points). Within-group differences following PR were significant for MDP sensory quality: IG mean difference [95% CI] -2.2 [-3.3 to -1.2]; CG -1.5 [-2.5 to -0.5] points; MDP emotional response: IG -3.2 [-4.2 to -2.3]; CG -2.2 [-3.2 to -1.3] points). Participant-selected music listening during PR offered no greater benefit to symptoms of dyspnoea or exertion compared to usual care. With the study limited by COVID-19 restrictions, the role of this adjunct remains to be clarified.</p>","PeriodicalId":10217,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Respiratory Disease","volume":"21 ","pages":"14799731241291065"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11457285/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142379166","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reviewer thank you. 审查员 谢谢。
IF 4.1 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/14799731241233394
{"title":"Reviewer thank you.","authors":"","doi":"10.1177/14799731241233394","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14799731241233394","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10217,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Respiratory Disease","volume":"21 ","pages":"14799731241233394"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10943743/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140139978","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A shared decision-making intervention for individuals living with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who are considering the menu of pulmonary rehabilitation treatment options; a feasibility study. 为正在考虑肺康复治疗方案的慢性阻塞性肺病患者提供共同决策干预;可行性研究。
IF 4.1 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/14799731241238428
A C Barradell,G Doe,H L Bekker,L Houchen-Wolloff,N Robertson,S J Singh
OBJECTIVESShared Decision Making (SDM) has potential to support Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR) decision-making when patients are offered a menu of centre- and home-based options. This study sought to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a three-component PR SDM intervention for individuals with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and PR healthcare professionals.METHODSParticipants were recruited from Dec 2021-Sep 2022. Healthcare professionals attended decision coaching training and used the consultation prompt during consultations. Individuals received the Patient Decision Aid (PtDA) at PR referral. Outcomes included recruitment capability, data completeness, intervention fidelity, and acceptability. Questionnaires assessed patient activation and decisional conflict pre and post-PR. Consultations were assessed using Observer OPTION-5. Optional interviews/focus groups were conducted.RESULTS13% of individuals [n = 31, 32% female, mean (SD) age 71.19 (7.50), median (IQR) MRC dyspnoea 3.50 (1.75)] and 100 % of healthcare professionals (n = 9, 78% female) were recruited. 28 (90.32%) of individuals completed all questionnaires. SDM was present in all consultations [standardised scores were mean (SD) = 36.97 (21.40)]. Six healthcare professionals and five individuals were interviewed. All felt consultations using the PtDA minimised healthcare professionals' bias of centre-based PR, increased individuals' self-awareness of their health, prompted consideration of how to improve it, and increased involvement in decision-making.DISCUSSIONResults indicate the study processes and SDM intervention is feasible and acceptable and can be delivered with fidelity when integrated into the PR pathway.
目的当患者可在中心和家庭进行选择时,共享决策(SDM)有可能为肺康复(PR)决策提供支持。本研究旨在评估由三部分组成的肺康复 SDM 干预对慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)患者和肺康复医护人员的可行性和可接受性。医护人员参加了决策指导培训,并在咨询过程中使用了咨询提示。患者在转诊时会收到患者决策辅助工具(PtDA)。结果包括招募能力、数据完整性、干预忠实性和可接受性。问卷调查评估了患者转诊前和转诊后的积极性和决策冲突。使用观察者 OPTION-5 对会诊情况进行评估。结果13%的个体[n = 31,32% 为女性,平均(标清)年龄 71.19 (7.50),MRC 呼吸困难中位数(IQR)3.50 (1.75)]和 100% 的医护人员(n = 9,78% 为女性)被招募。28人(90.32%)完成了所有问卷。所有会诊中均存在 SDM [标准化评分的平均值(标准差)= 36.97 (21.40)]。六名医护人员和五名患者接受了访谈。结果表明,研究过程和 SDM 干预是可行的、可接受的,在整合到公关路径中时可以忠实地实施。
{"title":"A shared decision-making intervention for individuals living with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who are considering the menu of pulmonary rehabilitation treatment options; a feasibility study.","authors":"A C Barradell,G Doe,H L Bekker,L Houchen-Wolloff,N Robertson,S J Singh","doi":"10.1177/14799731241238428","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14799731241238428","url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVESShared Decision Making (SDM) has potential to support Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR) decision-making when patients are offered a menu of centre- and home-based options. This study sought to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a three-component PR SDM intervention for individuals with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and PR healthcare professionals.METHODSParticipants were recruited from Dec 2021-Sep 2022. Healthcare professionals attended decision coaching training and used the consultation prompt during consultations. Individuals received the Patient Decision Aid (PtDA) at PR referral. Outcomes included recruitment capability, data completeness, intervention fidelity, and acceptability. Questionnaires assessed patient activation and decisional conflict pre and post-PR. Consultations were assessed using Observer OPTION-5. Optional interviews/focus groups were conducted.RESULTS13% of individuals [n = 31, 32% female, mean (SD) age 71.19 (7.50), median (IQR) MRC dyspnoea 3.50 (1.75)] and 100 % of healthcare professionals (n = 9, 78% female) were recruited. 28 (90.32%) of individuals completed all questionnaires. SDM was present in all consultations [standardised scores were mean (SD) = 36.97 (21.40)]. Six healthcare professionals and five individuals were interviewed. All felt consultations using the PtDA minimised healthcare professionals' bias of centre-based PR, increased individuals' self-awareness of their health, prompted consideration of how to improve it, and increased involvement in decision-making.DISCUSSIONResults indicate the study processes and SDM intervention is feasible and acceptable and can be delivered with fidelity when integrated into the PR pathway.","PeriodicalId":10217,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Respiratory Disease","volume":"15 1","pages":"14799731241238428"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142179596","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Out-of-pocket costs associated with chronic respiratory diseases in Korean adults. 韩国成年人与慢性呼吸系统疾病相关的自付费用。
IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/14799731241233301
Jun Su Park, Bomgyeol Kim, Yejin Kim, Sang Gyu Lee, Tae Hyun Kim

Objectives: Chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs) are a burden on both individuals and society. While previous literature has highlighted the clinical burden and total costs of care, it has not addressed patients' direct payments. This study aimed to estimate the incremental healthcare costs associated with patients with CRDs, specifically out-of-pocket (OOP) costs.

Methods: We used survey data from the 2019 Korea Health Panel Survey to estimate the total OOP costs of CRDs by comparing the annual hospitalizations, outpatient visits, emergency room visits, and medications of patients with and without CRDs. Generalized linear regression models controlled for differences in other characteristics between groups.

Results: We identified 222 patients with CRDs, of whom 166 were aged 65 years and older. Compared with the non-CRD group, CRD patients spent more on OOP costs (238.3 USD on average). Incremental costs were driven by outpatient visits and medications, which are subject to a coinsurance of 30% or more and may include items not covered by public insurance. Moreover, CRD patients aged 50-64 years incurred the highest incremental costs.

Discussion: The financial burden associated with CRDs is significant, and outpatient visits and medications constitute the largest components of OOP spending. Policymakers should introduce appropriate strategies to reduce CRD-associated burdens.

目的:慢性呼吸系统疾病(CRD)是个人和社会的负担。以往的文献强调了临床负担和医疗总成本,但并未涉及患者的直接支付。本研究旨在估算与 CRD 患者相关的增量医疗成本,特别是自付(OOP)成本:我们使用了 2019 年韩国健康小组调查的调查数据,通过比较有 CRD 和没有 CRD 患者的年度住院、门诊就诊、急诊就诊和用药情况,估算了 CRD 的自付费用总额。广义线性回归模型控制了组间其他特征的差异:我们发现了 222 名 CRD 患者,其中 166 人年龄在 65 岁及以上。与非 CRD 组相比,CRD 患者的 OOP 费用更高(平均 238.3 美元)。增加的费用主要来自门诊和药物,这些费用的共同保险比例为 30% 或更高,而且可能包括公共保险不承保的项目。此外,50-64 岁的慢性阻塞性肺病患者的增量成本最高:讨论:与 CRD 相关的经济负担十分沉重,而门诊就诊和药物治疗是 OOP 支出的最大组成部分。政策制定者应采取适当的策略来减轻与 CRD 相关的负担。
{"title":"Out-of-pocket costs associated with chronic respiratory diseases in Korean adults.","authors":"Jun Su Park, Bomgyeol Kim, Yejin Kim, Sang Gyu Lee, Tae Hyun Kim","doi":"10.1177/14799731241233301","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14799731241233301","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs) are a burden on both individuals and society. While previous literature has highlighted the clinical burden and total costs of care, it has not addressed patients' direct payments. This study aimed to estimate the incremental healthcare costs associated with patients with CRDs, specifically out-of-pocket (OOP) costs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used survey data from the 2019 Korea Health Panel Survey to estimate the total OOP costs of CRDs by comparing the annual hospitalizations, outpatient visits, emergency room visits, and medications of patients with and without CRDs. Generalized linear regression models controlled for differences in other characteristics between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 222 patients with CRDs, of whom 166 were aged 65 years and older. Compared with the non-CRD group, CRD patients spent more on OOP costs (238.3 USD on average). Incremental costs were driven by outpatient visits and medications, which are subject to a coinsurance of 30% or more and may include items not covered by public insurance. Moreover, CRD patients aged 50-64 years incurred the highest incremental costs.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The financial burden associated with CRDs is significant, and outpatient visits and medications constitute the largest components of OOP spending. Policymakers should introduce appropriate strategies to reduce CRD-associated burdens.</p>","PeriodicalId":10217,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Respiratory Disease","volume":"21 ","pages":"14799731241233301"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10893827/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139930292","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A history of home mechanical ventilation: The past, present and future. 家用机械通风的历史:过去、现在和未来。
IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/14799731241240776
Rebecca F D'Cruz, Nicholas Hart

This state-of-the-art review provides an overview of the history of home mechanical ventilation (HMV), including early descriptions of mechanical ventilation from ancient and Renaissance perspectives and the mass development of ventilators designed for long-term use during the poliomyelitis epidemic. Seminal data from key clinical trials supports the application of HMV in certain patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, neuromuscular disease and obesity-related respiratory failure. Innovative engineering coupled with refined physiological understanding now permits widespread delivery of home mechanical ventilation to a global population, using portable devices with advanced ventilatory modes and telemonitoring capabilities. Exponential growth in digital technology continues, and ongoing research is needed to understand how to harness clinical and physiological data to benefit patients and healthcare services in a clinically- and cost-effective manner.

这篇最新综述概述了家用机械通气(HMV)的历史,包括古代和文艺复兴时期对机械通气的早期描述,以及脊髓灰质炎流行期间为长期使用而设计的呼吸机的大规模开发。关键临床试验的重要数据支持家用机械通气在某些慢性阻塞性肺病、神经肌肉疾病和肥胖相关呼吸衰竭患者中的应用。创新的工程技术加上对生理机能的深入了解,现在可以利用具有先进通气模式和远程监控功能的便携式设备,为全球人口广泛提供家庭机械通气服务。数字技术仍在飞速发展,我们需要不断开展研究,以了解如何利用临床和生理数据,以符合临床和成本效益的方式造福患者和医疗服务。
{"title":"A history of home mechanical ventilation: The past, present and future.","authors":"Rebecca F D'Cruz, Nicholas Hart","doi":"10.1177/14799731241240776","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14799731241240776","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This state-of-the-art review provides an overview of the history of home mechanical ventilation (HMV), including early descriptions of mechanical ventilation from ancient and Renaissance perspectives and the mass development of ventilators designed for long-term use during the poliomyelitis epidemic. Seminal data from key clinical trials supports the application of HMV in certain patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, neuromuscular disease and obesity-related respiratory failure. Innovative engineering coupled with refined physiological understanding now permits widespread delivery of home mechanical ventilation to a global population, using portable devices with advanced ventilatory modes and telemonitoring capabilities. Exponential growth in digital technology continues, and ongoing research is needed to understand how to harness clinical and physiological data to benefit patients and healthcare services in a clinically- and cost-effective manner.</p>","PeriodicalId":10217,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Respiratory Disease","volume":"21 ","pages":"14799731241240776"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10958804/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140173962","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Chronic Respiratory Disease
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1