Clinical and experimental rheumatology最新文献

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of a dermatologist-filled-in 7-item questionnaire (called HERACLES) as a screening tool for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in patients with psoriasis.

Methods: This study was performed in Italy in seven dermatology centres cooperating with rheumatology centres. Adults with psoriasis were consecutively recruited up to a calculated number of 750. They were invited to fill in the following questionnaires used for PsA screening: ToPAS, PASE, PEST, and EARP. The dermatologists, in addition to standard demographic and clinical data, scored each participant using a new 7-item questionnaire. All participants were later evaluated by the rheumatologists for a diagnosis of PsA. The performance of the various questionnaires was compared using receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) area-under-the-curve (AUC) analysis.

Results: Of the 759 enrolled psoriatic patients, 524 (280 males and 244 females) were suitable for data analysis. PsA was diagnosed in 73 (13.9%) participants. PsA and non-PsA patient characteristics were comparable, except for arthritis-related features which were often more prevalent in the PsA group. The ROC AUC of the HERACLES instrument was 0.775 (CI: 0.722-0.828), similar to that of the other questionnaires (ToPAS 0.757; PASE 0.730; PEST 0.741; and EARP 0.739). For the HERACLES instrument, a score value of 2 yielded a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 47%.

Conclusions: In this study, a dermatologist-filled-in questionnaire proved to be not inferior to patient-administered PsA screening tools and to be feasible. It might be an alternative (or additional) tool to screen psoriatic patients for rheumatology referral.

Objectives: Utilising Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) questionnaires can enhance clinical care by measuring longitudinal changes in symptom severity as reported by the patient. The aim of this pilot study was to assess the feasibility and impact of incorporating PROMIS® questionnaires at the point-of-care in rheumatology practice.

Methods: Patients with rheumatic diseases and decrements in ≥1 PROMIS® domain (pain intensity, physical function, or sleep disturbance) were stratified by their concerning domain, then randomised to either receive an interpretation of their PROMIS® scores prior to their rheumatology appointment (Arm 1) or to usual care (Arm 2) (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05026853). The primary outcome was the documentation of PROMIS® scores in the electronic medical record (EMR). Secondary outcomes include recommendations made by physicians based on PROMIS® scores, patient-provider communication, and change in the most concerning PROMIS® domain score from baseline to 12 weeks.

Results: 110 patients were enrolled. 55 were randomised to receive report cards (Arm 1), of which 46 received the report card, and 55 received usual care (Arm 2). Documentation of PROMIS® scores in the EMR was 50% higher in Arm 1 (12.7% in Arm 2, p<0.0001). More recommendations were made based on PROMIS® scores for Arm 1 patients. There was no significant difference in post-visit PROMIS® score improvement between Arm 1 and Arm 2.

Conclusions: Providing PROMIS® report cards to patients and healthcare providers increased score documentation in the EMR. Increased recommendations made based on PROMIS® scores in Arm 1 suggest that having a score interpretation might help direct medical decision-making.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of introducing tofacitinib in second-line therapies after methotrexate failure for rheumatoid arthritis in France.

Methods: Using a Markov model, we simulated a cohort of 10,000 patients based on literature data to compare various treatment strategies. The reference strategy included the four classes of biologics commonly used in France (TNFi, tocilizumab, abatacept, rituximab). The trial strategies additionally included tofacitinib at different introduction positions. The cycle duration was set at 6 months, and the time horizon was a lifetime. The data for severe adverse effects were sourced from the ORAL Surveillance study.

Results: Compared to the reference strategy, introducing tofacitinib is a dominant strategy, regardless of its introduction position. Introducing it as the first-line treatment results in the greatest cost savings (€1,679 per patient) while increasing quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) by 0.29. According to the one-way sensitivity analysis, the discount rate and the cost of TNFi were the two variables that most influenced costs, while the change in HAQ score and the discount rate were the two variables that most influenced QALYs.

Conclusions: Our study represents the first assessment of the cost-effectiveness of tofacitinib in France and incorporates the latest adverse effects reported in the literature. It reinforces previously obtained results from other countries. Our study has some limitations, mainly related to the use of data from clinical trials. Our analysis is limited to severe adverse effects, and their cost is extrapolated from the average hospitalisation cost. The estimated costs are therefore underestimated for chronic diseases such as cancer.

Objectives: To evaluate the role of Fcγ receptors (FcγR) and peptidyl arginine deiminase (PAD) in anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA)-induced fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLSs)-mediated osteoclastogenesis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods: FLSs and peripheral blood mononuclear cells were collected from patients with RA. We stimulated RA-FLS with ACPA (100 ng/ml) with and without anti-cluster of differentiation (CD)32a/CD64 (FcγRIIA/FcγRI) antibody and PAD-2/4 inhibitors. Flow cytometry and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay were also performed. CD14+ monocytes were cultured with receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa beta (RANKL) and macrophage colony-stimulating factor, and ACPA-stimulated RA-FLSs were added. These cells were cultured for 14 days, and osteoclastogenesis was quantified using tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining.

Results: ACPA increased RANKL+ and tumour necrotic factor-alpha (TNF-α+) FLS, which decreased dose-dependently by adding 5 and 10 ug/mL anti-CD64 antibody rather than anti-CD32a antibody. In PAD inhibitor experiments, the proportion of RANKL+ and TNF-α+ FLS decreased in 50 μM condition containing PAD-2 inhibitor rather than PAD-4 inhibitor. The co-culture of ACPA-stimulated RA-FLSs and osteoclast precursors increased the TRAP+ multinucleated osteoclast count, which was decreased by anti-CD64 antibody and PAD2 inhibitor.

Conclusions: The present study showed that ACPA increased RANKL and pro-inflammatory cytokine expression in RA-FLSs, and ACPA-activated RA-FLSs could augment osteoclastogenesis. These processes were inhibited by treatment with anti-CD64 antibody and PAD-2 inhibitors. These results show that CD64 and PAD-2-induced pathways may be involved in ACPA-induced FLS activation and osteoclastogenesis in patients with RA. Therefore, regulating the CD64 and PAD-2 pathways may improve RA treatment.

Objectives: Starting from the unmet need of early diagnosis and treatment in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), the study aims to explore patient preferences in diagnostic pathways and treatment modalities. It seeks to integrate clinical priorities with patient perspectives, providing an optimal approach to SLE treatment that remains uncertain.

Methods: A discrete choice experiment (DCE) has been conducted to investigate whether patient preferences align while maintaining consistent attributes and levels, providing a direct assessment of relative preferences and hypothetical treatment approaches in SLE.

Results: DCE results demonstrated that obtaining an early diagnosis is the most crucial attribute for patients. Additionally, a multidisciplinary care team, capable of enhancing clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction, is essential, along with a clinical centre conveniently located within 30 minutes of the patient's home. Lastly, patients prefer the opportunity to reduce glucocorticoid to a dosage ≤5 mg/day, and eventually discontinue, aligning with the new EULAR recommendations, and favour oral and subcutaneous routes of administration for new course of treatment.

Conclusions: Patient preferences contribute to enhancing the care pathway for SLE by optimising disease management, with a focus on multidisciplinarity and psychological support.

Objectives: Mast cell activation induces pathological responses, including increased osteoclastogenesis in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Interleukin (IL)-18 binding protein (IL-18BP) has anti-inflammatory effects. In this study, we evaluated the effect of IL-18BP on mast cell activation and mast cell induced osteoclastogenesis.

Methods: Mast cells were activated by IL-33 (100 ng/mL) and cultured with IL-18BP (10, 50, and 100 ng/mL). The proliferation, apoptosis, and necroptosis of mast cells were measured using flow cytometry. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to measure the levels of mast cell enzymes, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP), soluble RANKL (sRANKL), and pro-inflammatory cytokines in the culture media. Monocytes from patients with RA patients (n=5) were cultured with activated mast cells with various concentrations of IL-18BP. TRAP+ multinucleated osteoclasts, bone resorption area, and osteoclast differentiation-related genes were measured.

Results: Proliferation of tryptase+chymase+c-kit+FcεR1+ mast cells was suppressed following incubation with IL-18BP (10, 50, and 100 ng/mL). RNA expression levels of tryptase and chymase were reduced by 100 ng/mL IL-18BP. Additionally, the levels of MMP-3/9, IL-17A, IL-6, TNF-α, and sRANKL were significantly inhibited by 100 ng/mL IL-18BP. Annexin V+ and annexin V-PI+ mast cells were reduced following incubation with 100 ng/mL IL-18BP. The addition of IL-33 significantly stimulated mast cell and increased TRAP+ multinucleated cells and bone resorption area, and these effects were suppressed by IL-18BP. The osteoclast-related genes (TRAP, ATP6v0d2, RANK, and cathepsin K) expression were suppressed by IL-18BP.

Conclusions: IL-18BP suppressed mast cell activation and mast cell induced osteoclastogenesis. This suggests a potential anti-arthritic role for IL-18BP in patients with RA.

Patients with autoimmune disease-related interstitial lung disease may develop pulmonary fibrosis, which may become progressive. Progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) is associated with poor outcomes. Antifibrotic therapies have shown efficacy as treatments for PPF in patients with autoimmune diseases, but new treatments are needed to slow or halt disease progression. Phosphodiesterases (PDEs) are enzymes that mediate the hydrolysis of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) and cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP). Pre-clinical data suggest that preferential inhibition of PDE4B has the potential to slow the progression of pulmonary fibrosis by inhibiting inflammatory and fibrotic pathways, with a lower risk of gastrointestinal adverse events than associated with pan-PDE4 inhibitors. Nerandomilast (BI 1015550) is a preferential PDE4 inhibitor that has demonstrated anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic effects in pre-clinical studies. In a phase II trial in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, nerandomilast (given alone or on top of background antifibrotic therapy) prevented a decrease in lung function over 12 weeks with an acceptable safety and tolerability profile. The phase III FIBRONEER-ILD trial is evaluating the efficacy and safety of nerandomilast, given alone or on top of nintedanib, in patients with PPF, including PPF associated with autoimmune diseases. In this article, we review the potential of PDE4B inhibition in the treatment of ILD associated with autoimmune diseases, including the pre-clinical and early clinical data available to date.