Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology最新文献

Introduction: Tegoprazan (TPZ), a potassium-competitive acid blocker, exerts a strong acid-suppression effect and a rapid onset of action. However, research on TPZ-amoxicillin (TA) dual treatment is limited. Here, we compared the safety and efficacy of TPZ-amoxicillin dual treatment and TPZ, bismuth potassium citrate, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin (TBAC) quadruple therapy in patients newly diagnosed with H. pylori infection over a 14-day treatment period.

Methods: A total of 236 patients newly diagnosed with H. pylori were enrolled in this multicenter, prospective, open-label, and randomized controlled study. Patients randomly received either TA dual or TBAC quadruple therapy. The incidence of adverse reactions and treatment compliance were recorded and then analyzed.

Results: The intention-to-treat analysis revealed that H. pylori eradication rates were 83.9% (95% confidence interval 78.2%-91.3%) and 81.4% (95% confidence interval 74.2%-88.5%) for the TA and TBAC groups, respectively, with no statistically significant difference between them ( P = 0.606). The per-protocol analysis revealed that the H. pylori eradication rates were 88.3% and 84.8% for the TA and TBAC groups, respectively ( P = 0.447). The incidence of adverse reactions was significantly lower in the TA group than in the TBAC group (4.2% vs 15.3%, P = 0.004). Moreover, the TA group demonstrated substantially higher treatment compliance than the TBAC group (94.1% vs 89.0%, P = 0.020).

Discussion: The TA dual therapy successfully eradicated H. pylori with a high eradication rate and a low incidence of adverse reactions. Therefore, this treatment is recommended as an alternative course for patients newly diagnosed with H. pylori infection.

Introduction: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) allows for characterization and biopsy of pancreatic lesions. Pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCN) include mucinous (M-PCN) and nonmucinous lesions (NM-PCN). Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (P-DAC) is the commonest pancreatic solid lesion (PSL), followed by pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (P-NET). Although EUS is preferred for pancreatic lesion evaluation, its diagnostic accuracy is suboptimal. This multicentric study aims to develop a convolutional neural network (CNN) for detecting and distinguishing PCN (namely M-PCN and NM-PCN) and PSL (particularly P-DAC and P-NET).

Methods: A CNN was developed with 378 EUS examinations from 4 international reference centers (Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, New York University Hospitals, Hospital das Clínicas Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo). About 126.000 images were obtained-19.528 M-PCN, 8.175 NM-PCN, 64.286 P-DAC, 29.153 P-NET, and 4.858 normal pancreas images. A trinary CNN differentiated normal pancreas tissue from M-PCN and NM-PCN. A binary CNN distinguished P-DAC from P-NET. The total data set was divided into a training and testing data set (used for model's evaluation) in a 90/10% ratio. The model was evaluated through its sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy.

Results: The CNN had 99.1% accuracy for identifying normal pancreatic tissue, 99.0% and 99.8% for M-PCN and NM-PCN, respectively. P-DAC and P-NET were distinguished with 94.0% accuracy.

Discussion: Our group developed the first worldwide CNN capable of detecting and differentiating the commonest PCN and PSL in EUS images, using examinations from 4 centers in 2 continents, minimizing the impact of the demographic bias. Larger multicentric studies are needed for technology implementation.

Introduction: Splenic stiffness (SS) measurement (SSM) is an evolving noninvasive assessment to evaluate portal hypertension. Studies with respect to SSM in patients with alcohol use disorder are limited.

Methods: We studied patients seeking treatment for alcohol use disorder in an inpatient treatment protocol at the National Institutes of Health and parsed SSM into 3 groups based on degree of change.

Results: The improved SS group had statistically higher initial SSM and a nonstatistically increased liver stiffness measurement compared with others.

Discussion: SS is dynamic in a subset of patients immediately after alcohol cessation, and improved SS is associated with a normalization of platelet count.

Introduction: Both liraglutide and colesevelam improve bile acid diarrhea (BAD) symptoms. Colesevelam binds excess amounts of diarrhea-causing bile acids in the colon whereas the mode of action for liraglutide remains elusive. Here, we examined the impact of colesevelam and liraglutide treatment on the concentrations of bile acids in serum and feces and the fecal microbiota composition to better understand the two drugs' modes of action.

Methods: Bile acid species were analyzed in serum and fecal samples from a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy trial at baseline and after three and six weeks of orally administered colesevelam (1,875 mg twice daily, n = 26) or subcutaneously administered liraglutide (uptitrated by weekly increments of 0.6 mg from 0.6 to 1.8 mg daily, n = 26) in patients with 75selenium-homotaurocholic acid test-verified, idiopathic, or post-cholecystectomy BAD. Fecal microbiota composition was analyzed by 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing at the same time points.

Results: Colesevelam increased the fecal concentrations of all bile acid species while it decreased serum concentrations of secondary bile acids. Liraglutide induced a small increase in serum unconjugated bile acid concentrations without affecting fecal bile acid concentrations. No changes in fecal microbiota composition were observed with either treatment.

Conclusion: Colesevelam and liraglutide exhibit distinct effects on serum and fecal bile acid concentrations with colesevelam reducing serum concentrations of secondary bile acids and promoting fecal bile acid excretion while liraglutide enhances serum concentrations of unconjugated bile acids, potentially through deceleration of small intestinal transit time allowing more time for passive absorption of bile acids.

Introduction: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate admission serum anion gap (AG) as a predictor of all-cause mortality in critically ill patients with cirrhosis.

Methods: A total of 3,084 cirrhotic patients were included and randomly divided into training and validation cohorts (n = 2,159 and 925, respectively). Patients were categorized into high and normal AG groups based on their AG values. Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were used to assess the relationships between AG levels and outcomes.

Results: Both cohorts showed strong parameter similarity ( P > 0.05). High AG was associated with significantly lower survival probabilities. Cox models confirmed elevated AG as a risk factor, even after adjusting for covariates (hazard ratio: 1.920, 1.793, and 1.764 for 30-day, 60-day, and hospital mortality, respectively). Subgroup analyses, especially regarding chronic kidney disease, revealed complex interactions. Serum AG displayed predictive power comparable with established scoring systems.

Discussion: Elevated AG at admission is a valuable predictor of poor outcomes and increased mortality risk in critically ill cirrhotic patients. Serum AG can serve as an easily accessible tool for risk assessment and prognosis evaluation in this population.

Introduction: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic limited access to colonoscopy. To advance colorectal cancer health equity, we conducted a quality improvement study on colonoscopy wait times in 2019-2023 for underinsured (Medicaid, uninsured) compared with insured patients at an academic medical center providing colonoscopy for surrounding Federally Qualified Health Centers.

Methods: Retrospective chart reviews were performed on adult outpatient colonoscopies in the preintervention period (2019-2021). In 2022, an institutional grant funded bilingual patient navigation to reduce colonoscopy wait times. Postintervention data were collected prospectively from May 2022 to May 2023 in 2 phases. Multivariable regression analyses were conducted for colonoscopy wait times as a primary outcome.

Results: Analysis of 3,403 screening/surveillance and 1,896 diagnostic colonoscopies revealed significantly longer colonoscopy wait times for underinsured compared with insured patients after 2019. For screening/surveillance colonoscopies, wait time differences between underinsured and insured patients in the second postintervention phase were reduced by 34.21 days (95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.07-57.35) compared with the postpandemic period and by 56.36 days (95% CI: 34.16-78.55) compared with the first postintervention phase. For diagnostic colonoscopies, wait time differences in the second postintervention phase were reduced by 27.57 days (95% CI: 9.96-45.19) compared with the postpandemic period and by 20.40 days (95% CI: 1.02-39.77) compared with the first postintervention phase.

Discussion: Colonoscopy wait times were significantly longer for underinsured compared with insured patients following the COVID-19 pandemic. This disparity was partially ameliorated by patient navigation. Monitoring outpatient colonoscopy wait times in underinsured patients is important for advancing health equity.