Pub Date : 2025-12-09DOI: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000959
Brendan Broderick, Jason Greenwood, Douglas Mahoney, Kelli Burger, Sushil Kumar Garg, Michael B Wallace, Suryakanth R Gurudu, Derek Ebner, John Kisiel
Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a leading cause of cancer associated death in the United States and colonoscopy the primary screening strategy for prevention. Rates of adenomatous and serrated neoplasia detection are inversely associated with post-colonoscopy CRC. This crucial quality metric depends on accurate ascertainment of colorectal neoplasia findings from both endoscopy and histopathology records. We aimed to assess the feasibility of a random forest machine learning model to rapidly and accurately categorize colorectal neoplasia from electronic health record data.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study compared neoplasia detection rates among individuals undergoing colonoscopy at a large academic institution to develop a rule-based algorithm to categorize colorectal neoplasia from endoscopy reports and pathology SNOMED II codes. This cohort provided a large training set to develop a natural language processing (NLP) system using a random forest approach to automatically classify unstructured pathology findings into adenoma, serrated, or advanced neoplasms. This system was manually validated through an independent holdout set.
Results: The training set comprised 35,953 unstructured pathology reports with matched SNOWMED II codes from 95,188 unstructured colonoscopy reports. The final model was assessed on an independent holdout set of 337 manually annotated procedures obtaining an AUC of 0.997 (CI 0.994 - 1), 0.99 (CI 0.98-1), and 0.99 (CI 0.98-0.99) for prediction of adenoma, serrated, and advanced lesions respectively.
Discussion: The random forest-based hybrid NLP system for classification of colonoscopy results was both accurate and explainable. NLP combined with effective machine learning algorithms can provide a scalable strategy for colonoscopy quality monitoring.
{"title":"Accurate and Scalable Classification of Colonoscopy Neoplasia using Machine Learning and Natural Language Processing.","authors":"Brendan Broderick, Jason Greenwood, Douglas Mahoney, Kelli Burger, Sushil Kumar Garg, Michael B Wallace, Suryakanth R Gurudu, Derek Ebner, John Kisiel","doi":"10.14309/ctg.0000000000000959","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000959","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a leading cause of cancer associated death in the United States and colonoscopy the primary screening strategy for prevention. Rates of adenomatous and serrated neoplasia detection are inversely associated with post-colonoscopy CRC. This crucial quality metric depends on accurate ascertainment of colorectal neoplasia findings from both endoscopy and histopathology records. We aimed to assess the feasibility of a random forest machine learning model to rapidly and accurately categorize colorectal neoplasia from electronic health record data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study compared neoplasia detection rates among individuals undergoing colonoscopy at a large academic institution to develop a rule-based algorithm to categorize colorectal neoplasia from endoscopy reports and pathology SNOMED II codes. This cohort provided a large training set to develop a natural language processing (NLP) system using a random forest approach to automatically classify unstructured pathology findings into adenoma, serrated, or advanced neoplasms. This system was manually validated through an independent holdout set.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The training set comprised 35,953 unstructured pathology reports with matched SNOWMED II codes from 95,188 unstructured colonoscopy reports. The final model was assessed on an independent holdout set of 337 manually annotated procedures obtaining an AUC of 0.997 (CI 0.994 - 1), 0.99 (CI 0.98-1), and 0.99 (CI 0.98-0.99) for prediction of adenoma, serrated, and advanced lesions respectively.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The random forest-based hybrid NLP system for classification of colonoscopy results was both accurate and explainable. NLP combined with effective machine learning algorithms can provide a scalable strategy for colonoscopy quality monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":10278,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145707667","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-09DOI: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000963
Michiel H J Maas, Milou L M van Riswijk, Timo Rath, Paola Cesaro, Daniele Salvi, Peter D Siersema
Introduction: Mucosal exposure devices (MEDs) and computer-aided detection (CADe) systems may both improve adenoma detection through distinct mechanisms: expanding mucosal visualization and highlighting lesions, respectively. This study investigated the efficacy of combining CADe-assisted colonoscopy with a MED compared to CADe-assisted colonoscopy alone.
Methods: This international, multicenter, prospective, non-randomized, single-arm study (NTC05220345) was conducted at three centers that also participated in the previous DISCOVERY II randomized controlled trial, comparing CADe-assisted with conventional colonoscopy. Patients referred for diagnostic, non-fecal immunochemical test screening, or surveillance colonoscopy and underwent CADe-assisted colonoscopy (DISCOVERY™, PENTAX Medical) with a MED using an integrated inflatable balloon (G-EYE™, PENTAX Medical). The primary outcome was adenoma detection rate (ADR); secondary outcomes included sessile serrated lesion detection rate (SSLDR) and withdrawal time without interventions. Outcomes were compared to historical controls of the CADe-arm of the DISCOVERY II study.
Results: Of 196 enrolled participants, 182 were included in the final analysis and compared with 250 participants from the historical CADe-arm. ADR was 47.3% in the CADe + MED-group vs. 38.4% in the CADe-group (p=.066; absolute difference: 8.9%, 95% CI: -0.6-18.3). Mixed-effects logistic regression model adjusting for clustering and confounders calculated an odds ratio of 1.16 (95% CI: 0.74-1.81). Median withdrawal time was slightly longer with CADe + MED compared to CADe-only (10.0 vs. 9.2 minutes, p=.004), while SSLDR was not significantly different (12.6% vs. 18.4%, p=.11).
Conclusions: In this study using historical controls, CADe-assisted colonoscopy combined with a MED did not significantly increase ADR compared to CADe alone, suggesting limited synergistic benefit.
{"title":"Effect of combination of a mucosal exposure device and computer-aided detection in diagnostic, screening and surveillance colonoscopy: an international, multicenter study.","authors":"Michiel H J Maas, Milou L M van Riswijk, Timo Rath, Paola Cesaro, Daniele Salvi, Peter D Siersema","doi":"10.14309/ctg.0000000000000963","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000963","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mucosal exposure devices (MEDs) and computer-aided detection (CADe) systems may both improve adenoma detection through distinct mechanisms: expanding mucosal visualization and highlighting lesions, respectively. This study investigated the efficacy of combining CADe-assisted colonoscopy with a MED compared to CADe-assisted colonoscopy alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This international, multicenter, prospective, non-randomized, single-arm study (NTC05220345) was conducted at three centers that also participated in the previous DISCOVERY II randomized controlled trial, comparing CADe-assisted with conventional colonoscopy. Patients referred for diagnostic, non-fecal immunochemical test screening, or surveillance colonoscopy and underwent CADe-assisted colonoscopy (DISCOVERY™, PENTAX Medical) with a MED using an integrated inflatable balloon (G-EYE™, PENTAX Medical). The primary outcome was adenoma detection rate (ADR); secondary outcomes included sessile serrated lesion detection rate (SSLDR) and withdrawal time without interventions. Outcomes were compared to historical controls of the CADe-arm of the DISCOVERY II study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 196 enrolled participants, 182 were included in the final analysis and compared with 250 participants from the historical CADe-arm. ADR was 47.3% in the CADe + MED-group vs. 38.4% in the CADe-group (p=.066; absolute difference: 8.9%, 95% CI: -0.6-18.3). Mixed-effects logistic regression model adjusting for clustering and confounders calculated an odds ratio of 1.16 (95% CI: 0.74-1.81). Median withdrawal time was slightly longer with CADe + MED compared to CADe-only (10.0 vs. 9.2 minutes, p=.004), while SSLDR was not significantly different (12.6% vs. 18.4%, p=.11).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study using historical controls, CADe-assisted colonoscopy combined with a MED did not significantly increase ADR compared to CADe alone, suggesting limited synergistic benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":10278,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145707613","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Entecavir (ETV), tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) are first-line nucleos(t)ide analogs (NA) for chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Real-world monitoring of patients on these agents and their comparative renal safety remain poorly characterized. We evaluated guideline-adherent monitoring practices and compared renal dysfunction risk across ETV, TDF, and TAF.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with CHB who initiated ETV, TDF, or TAF between 2012 and 2022. Levels of serum alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, albumin, serum creatinine, hepatitis B virus DNA, and abdominal sonograms were assessed every 6 months during the 36 months of NA treatment. Incidence rates and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for renal dysfunction were estimated by Cox regression.
Results: Of the 2,155 enrolled patients, 65.8% received ETV, 23.1% received TDF, and 11.1% underwent TAF. Alanine aminotransferase was monitored in >90% across all groups; other tests (bilirubin, albumin, creatinine, hepatitis B virus DNA, sonogram) were performed in only 20%-80%. After multivariable adjustment, TDF (HR 1.41; 95% confidence interval 0.95-2.08) and TAF (HR 0.91; 95% confidence interval 0.52-2.18) showed no significant difference in renal dysfunction risk vs ETV. Independent predictors of increased renal risk included older age, higher Charlson comorbidity index, fibrosis-4 score, and diuretic use, whereas elevated serum albumin levels were associated with a lower risk.
Discussion: In this real-world cohort, adherence to recommended monitoring for patients with CHB on NAs was suboptimal. ETV, TDF, and TAF demonstrated comparable renal safety profiles over 3 years.
恩替卡韦(ETV)、富马酸替诺福韦(TDF)和替诺福韦(TAF)是治疗慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)的一线核苷(t)类似物(NA)。对使用这些药物的患者的实际监测及其相对肾脏安全性的描述仍然很差。我们评估了遵循指南的监测实践,并比较了ETV、TDF和TAF的肾功能障碍风险。方法:回顾性分析2012年至2022年间接受ETV、TDF或TAF治疗的CHB患者。在36个月的NA治疗期间,每6个月评估一次血清丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)、总胆红素、白蛋白、血清肌酐、乙型肝炎病毒(HBV) DNA和腹部超声检查水平。通过Cox回归估计肾功能不全的发生率和校正危险比(hr)。结果:在2155例入组患者中,65.8%接受了ETV, 23.1%接受了TDF, 11.1%接受了TAF。在所有组中监测bb0 - 90%的ALT;其他检查(胆红素、白蛋白、肌酐、HBV DNA、超声)的阳性率仅为20-80%。多变量校正后,TDF (HR 1.41; 95% CI 0.95-2.08)和TAF (HR 0.91; 95% CI 0.52-2.18)与ETV相比,肾功能障碍风险无显著差异。肾脏风险增加的独立预测因素包括年龄较大、较高的Charlson合病指数、纤维化-4评分和利尿剂使用,而血清白蛋白水平升高与风险降低相关。结论:在这个真实世界的队列中,对服用NAs的CHB患者进行推荐监测的依从性并不理想。ETV、TDF和TAF在3年内显示出相当的肾脏安全性。
{"title":"Monitoring Adherence and Renal Safety of Nucleos(t)ide Analogs for Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B.","authors":"Chia-Chen Hsu, Zih-Er Chen, Fan-Hsiu Chao, Chian-Ying Chou, Yuh-Lih Chang, Yueh-Ching Chou, Ming-Chih Hou, Jaw-Ching Wu, Chien-Wei Su","doi":"10.14309/ctg.0000000000000962","DOIUrl":"10.14309/ctg.0000000000000962","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Entecavir (ETV), tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) are first-line nucleos(t)ide analogs (NA) for chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Real-world monitoring of patients on these agents and their comparative renal safety remain poorly characterized. We evaluated guideline-adherent monitoring practices and compared renal dysfunction risk across ETV, TDF, and TAF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed patients with CHB who initiated ETV, TDF, or TAF between 2012 and 2022. Levels of serum alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, albumin, serum creatinine, hepatitis B virus DNA, and abdominal sonograms were assessed every 6 months during the 36 months of NA treatment. Incidence rates and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for renal dysfunction were estimated by Cox regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 2,155 enrolled patients, 65.8% received ETV, 23.1% received TDF, and 11.1% underwent TAF. Alanine aminotransferase was monitored in >90% across all groups; other tests (bilirubin, albumin, creatinine, hepatitis B virus DNA, sonogram) were performed in only 20%-80%. After multivariable adjustment, TDF (HR 1.41; 95% confidence interval 0.95-2.08) and TAF (HR 0.91; 95% confidence interval 0.52-2.18) showed no significant difference in renal dysfunction risk vs ETV. Independent predictors of increased renal risk included older age, higher Charlson comorbidity index, fibrosis-4 score, and diuretic use, whereas elevated serum albumin levels were associated with a lower risk.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In this real-world cohort, adherence to recommended monitoring for patients with CHB on NAs was suboptimal. ETV, TDF, and TAF demonstrated comparable renal safety profiles over 3 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":10278,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145707675","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-08DOI: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000954
Lucas Guillo, Oumaya El Oumami, Philippe Seksik, Guillaume Le Cosquer, Louise Méheut, Vered Abitbol, Stéphane Nancey, Anthony Buisson, Mathieu Uzzan, Mathias Vidon, Ludovic Caillo, Bénédicte Caron, Alban Benezech, Calina Atanasiu, Nicolas Richard, Alexandre Nuzzo, Catherine Le Berre, Anne Bourrier, Catherine Reenaers, Julien Labreuche, Mélanie Serrero, Chrystèle Rubod, Pauline Wils
Introduction: Women with endometriosis have a higher risk of developing inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). This study aimed to better understanding the impact of endometriosis on the course of IBD.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study in 18 French and Belgian IBD centers between June 2022 and March 2023. Any patient with both conditions was eligible for inclusion. They were randomly matched to 1 or 2 patients with IBD without endometriosis. The impact on IBD progression was assessed using a composite severity criterion including intestinal damage or need for bowel surgery.
Results: Overall, 207 patients with both conditions (149 Crohn's disease [CD]; 58 ulcerative colitis [UC]) were matched to 409 patients with IBD alone. The median follow-up duration for IBD was 10 years (5.75-17). No difference was observed between the 2 groups regarding CD location, disease phenotype, and anoperineal involvement. Proctitis were more frequent in patients with UC and endometriosis. Patients with IBD with endometriosis were significantly less exposed to immunosuppressants (UC P < 0.01; CD P < 0.001) and biologics (UC P < 0.01; CD P < 0.001). Patients with CD with endometriosis had a less severe disease course compared with patients without endometriosis (hazard ratio 0.68, 95% confidence interval 0.50-0.92, P = 0.011). Patients with UC with endometriosis had not a significant different disease course compared with patients without endometriosis (hazard ratio 1.73, 95% confidence interval 0.74-4.00, P = 0.20). These results were similar in the subgroup of patients with endometriosis treated surgically.
Discussion: Endometriosis does not negatively influence the course of IBD, patients with CD even have a less severe progression. Patients were significantly less exposed to immunosuppressants and biologics.
{"title":"Impact of Endometriosis on the Progression of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.","authors":"Lucas Guillo, Oumaya El Oumami, Philippe Seksik, Guillaume Le Cosquer, Louise Méheut, Vered Abitbol, Stéphane Nancey, Anthony Buisson, Mathieu Uzzan, Mathias Vidon, Ludovic Caillo, Bénédicte Caron, Alban Benezech, Calina Atanasiu, Nicolas Richard, Alexandre Nuzzo, Catherine Le Berre, Anne Bourrier, Catherine Reenaers, Julien Labreuche, Mélanie Serrero, Chrystèle Rubod, Pauline Wils","doi":"10.14309/ctg.0000000000000954","DOIUrl":"10.14309/ctg.0000000000000954","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Women with endometriosis have a higher risk of developing inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). This study aimed to better understanding the impact of endometriosis on the course of IBD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study in 18 French and Belgian IBD centers between June 2022 and March 2023. Any patient with both conditions was eligible for inclusion. They were randomly matched to 1 or 2 patients with IBD without endometriosis. The impact on IBD progression was assessed using a composite severity criterion including intestinal damage or need for bowel surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 207 patients with both conditions (149 Crohn's disease [CD]; 58 ulcerative colitis [UC]) were matched to 409 patients with IBD alone. The median follow-up duration for IBD was 10 years (5.75-17). No difference was observed between the 2 groups regarding CD location, disease phenotype, and anoperineal involvement. Proctitis were more frequent in patients with UC and endometriosis. Patients with IBD with endometriosis were significantly less exposed to immunosuppressants (UC P < 0.01; CD P < 0.001) and biologics (UC P < 0.01; CD P < 0.001). Patients with CD with endometriosis had a less severe disease course compared with patients without endometriosis (hazard ratio 0.68, 95% confidence interval 0.50-0.92, P = 0.011). Patients with UC with endometriosis had not a significant different disease course compared with patients without endometriosis (hazard ratio 1.73, 95% confidence interval 0.74-4.00, P = 0.20). These results were similar in the subgroup of patients with endometriosis treated surgically.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Endometriosis does not negatively influence the course of IBD, patients with CD even have a less severe progression. Patients were significantly less exposed to immunosuppressants and biologics.</p>","PeriodicalId":10278,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145707659","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-05DOI: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000960
Eryn Rooney, Gio R Dela Cruz, Terry Ponich, James C Gregor, Nilesh Chande, Melanie D Beaton, Michael Sey, Reena Khanna, Richard B Kim, Aze Wilson
Introduction: Interleukin-13 receptor alpha 2 (IL13RA2), triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 (TREM-1), and oncostatin M (OSM) may be associated with response to tumor necrosis factor-α antagonists (TNFAs) in inflammatory bowel disease. We aimed to assess the direction of association between TNFA-induced clinical remission and IL13RA2 and TREM-1, respectively, and assess the value of combining biomarkers for identifying nonresponders.
Methods: Plasma samples from a retrospective inflammatory bowel disease cohort were collected before TNFA start. Clinical remission at 1-year, surgery, hospitalization, adverse drug events, and TNFA discontinuation were assessed. IL13RA2 and TREM-1 concentrations were compared between those with and without 1-year clinical remission. OSM data were obtained from our previous cohort. Where significant, TREM-1 and IL23RA2 thresholds associated with clinical remission at 1-year were assessed using a receiver operating characteristic analysis. Significant biomarkers were combined using a linear discriminant analysis. The performance characteristics were assessed for individual biomarkers and biomarker combinations.
Results: In Crohn's disease (CD) (n = 95) and ulcerative colitis (UC) (n = 53), higher IL13RA2 concentrations, but not TREM-1, were found among those not achieving TNFA-associated clinical remission at 1-year (IL13RA2, CD, P < 0.0001; UC, P = 0.0003). IL13RA2 thresholds, 4.554 ng/mL (CD) and 6.117 ng/mL (UC) separated those with and without clinical remission at 1-year (CD, area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.71-0.90, P < 0.0001; UC, area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.66-0.91, P = 0.0005). In CD, combining IL13RA2 and OSM concentrations enhanced prediction accuracy compared with either biomarker alone and increased the identification of other important clinical outcomes.
Discussion: IL13RA2, but not TREM-1, was associated with TNFA response. In CD, its prediction accuracy improves when combined with OSM.
白细胞介素-13受体α 2 (IL13RA2)、髓样细胞-1 (TREM-1)上表达的触发受体和抑癌素M (OSM)可能与炎症性肠病患者对肿瘤坏死因子-α拮抗剂(TNFAs)的反应有关。我们的目的是评估tnfa诱导的临床缓解与IL13RA2和TREM-1之间的关联方向,并评估联合生物标志物识别无反应的价值。方法:在TNFA开始前收集回顾性炎症性肠病队列的血浆样本。评估1年临床缓解、手术、住院、药物不良事件和TNFA停药情况。IL13RA2和TREM-1浓度在有和没有1年临床缓解的患者之间进行比较。OSM数据来自我们之前的队列。在有意义的情况下,使用受试者操作特征分析评估与1年临床缓解相关的TREM-1和IL23RA2阈值。使用线性判别分析将显著的生物标志物组合起来。评估了单个生物标志物和生物标志物组合的性能特征。结果:在克罗恩病(CD) (n = 95)和溃疡性结肠炎(UC) (n = 53)中,在1年未达到tnfa相关临床缓解的患者中发现较高的IL13RA2浓度,但没有发现TREM-1 (IL13RA2, CD, P < 0.0001; UC, P = 0.0003)。IL13RA2阈值为4.554 ng/mL (CD)和6.117 ng/mL (UC),区分了1年临床缓解和无临床缓解的患者(CD,受试者工作特征曲线下面积= 0.80,95% CI = 0.71-0.90, P < 0.0001; UC,受试者工作特征曲线下面积= 0.79,95% CI = 0.66-0.91, P = 0.0005)。在CD中,与单独使用任何一种生物标志物相比,结合IL13RA2和OSM浓度可提高预测准确性,并增加对其他重要临床结果的识别。讨论:IL13RA2,而不是TREM-1,与TNFA反应相关。在CD中,与OSM相结合,其预测精度得到提高。
{"title":"Combining Cytokine-Related Biomarkers to Better Define Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Antagonist Response in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: An Observational Cohort Study.","authors":"Eryn Rooney, Gio R Dela Cruz, Terry Ponich, James C Gregor, Nilesh Chande, Melanie D Beaton, Michael Sey, Reena Khanna, Richard B Kim, Aze Wilson","doi":"10.14309/ctg.0000000000000960","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000960","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Interleukin-13 receptor alpha 2 (IL13RA2), triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 (TREM-1), and oncostatin M (OSM) may be associated with response to tumor necrosis factor-α antagonists (TNFAs) in inflammatory bowel disease. We aimed to assess the direction of association between TNFA-induced clinical remission and IL13RA2 and TREM-1, respectively, and assess the value of combining biomarkers for identifying nonresponders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Plasma samples from a retrospective inflammatory bowel disease cohort were collected before TNFA start. Clinical remission at 1-year, surgery, hospitalization, adverse drug events, and TNFA discontinuation were assessed. IL13RA2 and TREM-1 concentrations were compared between those with and without 1-year clinical remission. OSM data were obtained from our previous cohort. Where significant, TREM-1 and IL23RA2 thresholds associated with clinical remission at 1-year were assessed using a receiver operating characteristic analysis. Significant biomarkers were combined using a linear discriminant analysis. The performance characteristics were assessed for individual biomarkers and biomarker combinations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Crohn's disease (CD) (n = 95) and ulcerative colitis (UC) (n = 53), higher IL13RA2 concentrations, but not TREM-1, were found among those not achieving TNFA-associated clinical remission at 1-year (IL13RA2, CD, P < 0.0001; UC, P = 0.0003). IL13RA2 thresholds, 4.554 ng/mL (CD) and 6.117 ng/mL (UC) separated those with and without clinical remission at 1-year (CD, area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.71-0.90, P < 0.0001; UC, area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.66-0.91, P = 0.0005). In CD, combining IL13RA2 and OSM concentrations enhanced prediction accuracy compared with either biomarker alone and increased the identification of other important clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>IL13RA2, but not TREM-1, was associated with TNFA response. In CD, its prediction accuracy improves when combined with OSM.</p>","PeriodicalId":10278,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146008306","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01DOI: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000941
Miguel Mascarenhas, Joana Mota, João Rala Cordeiro, Francisco Mendes, Miguel Martins, Pedro Cardoso, Maria João Almeida, Antonio Pinto da Costa, Ismael Hajra Martinez, Virginia Matallana Royo, Benjamin Niland, Jack Di Palma, João Ferreira, Guilherme Macedo, Cecilio Santander
Introduction: Esophageal motility disorders (EMDs) are common in clinical practice, with a high symptomatic burden and significant impact on the patients' quality of life. High-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) is the gold standard for the evaluation of functional esophageal disorders. The Chicago Classification offers a standardized approach to HREM. However, HREM remains a complex procedure, both in data analysis and in accessibility. This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning (ML) models to detect EMDs according to the Chicago Classification.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 618 HREM examinations from 3 centers (Spain and the United States) using 2 recording systems. Labels were assigned by expert consensus as either disorder present or absent for 2 categories: esophagogastric junction outflow disorders and peristalsis disorders. Several ML models were trained and evaluated. ML classifiers were developed using an 80/20 patient-level stratified split for training/validation and testing. Model selection was guided by internal evaluation through repeated 10-fold cross-validation. Model performance was assessed by accuracy and area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC).
Results: The GradientBoostingClassifier model outperformed the remaining ML models with an accuracy of 0.942 ± 0.015 and an AUC-ROC of 0.921 ± 0.041 for identifying disorders of esophagogastric junction outflow. The xGBClassifier model detected disorders of peristalsis with an accuracy of 0.809 ± 0.029 and an AUC-ROC of 0.871 ± 0.027. Performance was consistent across repeated validations, demonstrating model robustness and generalization.
Discussion: This multicenter, multidevice study demonstrates that ML models can accurately detect EMDs in HREM. Artificial intelligence-driven HREM may improve diagnosis by standardizing interpretation and reducing interobserver variability.
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence Driven Diagnosis of Motility Patterns in High-Resolution Esophageal Manometry: A Multicentric Multidevice Study.","authors":"Miguel Mascarenhas, Joana Mota, João Rala Cordeiro, Francisco Mendes, Miguel Martins, Pedro Cardoso, Maria João Almeida, Antonio Pinto da Costa, Ismael Hajra Martinez, Virginia Matallana Royo, Benjamin Niland, Jack Di Palma, João Ferreira, Guilherme Macedo, Cecilio Santander","doi":"10.14309/ctg.0000000000000941","DOIUrl":"10.14309/ctg.0000000000000941","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Esophageal motility disorders (EMDs) are common in clinical practice, with a high symptomatic burden and significant impact on the patients' quality of life. High-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) is the gold standard for the evaluation of functional esophageal disorders. The Chicago Classification offers a standardized approach to HREM. However, HREM remains a complex procedure, both in data analysis and in accessibility. This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning (ML) models to detect EMDs according to the Chicago Classification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 618 HREM examinations from 3 centers (Spain and the United States) using 2 recording systems. Labels were assigned by expert consensus as either disorder present or absent for 2 categories: esophagogastric junction outflow disorders and peristalsis disorders. Several ML models were trained and evaluated. ML classifiers were developed using an 80/20 patient-level stratified split for training/validation and testing. Model selection was guided by internal evaluation through repeated 10-fold cross-validation. Model performance was assessed by accuracy and area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The GradientBoostingClassifier model outperformed the remaining ML models with an accuracy of 0.942 ± 0.015 and an AUC-ROC of 0.921 ± 0.041 for identifying disorders of esophagogastric junction outflow. The xGBClassifier model detected disorders of peristalsis with an accuracy of 0.809 ± 0.029 and an AUC-ROC of 0.871 ± 0.027. Performance was consistent across repeated validations, demonstrating model robustness and generalization.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This multicenter, multidevice study demonstrates that ML models can accurately detect EMDs in HREM. Artificial intelligence-driven HREM may improve diagnosis by standardizing interpretation and reducing interobserver variability.</p>","PeriodicalId":10278,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"e00941"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12727342/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145343961","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Esophagogastric varices (EGV) are known to correlate with a poorer prognosis in patients with liver cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma. However, their clinical significance in patients with cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) remains unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of EGV on the outcomes of patients with CCA.
Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 923 consecutive treatment-naive patients diagnosed with CCA between January 2013 and December 2023. Among these, 321 patients received esophagogastroduodenoscopy at the time of CCA diagnosis. The primary end point was to assess the impact of EGV on overall survival (OS) in patients with CCA, whereas the secondary end point was to identify the predictive factors for the occurrence of EGV.
Results: Of the patients analyzed, 47 (14.6%) were diagnosed with EGV by esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Among these, 39 patients did not receive primary prophylaxis for EGV bleeding and were classified as the EGV group, whereas the remaining 274 patients (85.4%) formed the non-EGV group. The median OS was shorter in the EGV group than that in the non-EGV group (182 vs 357 days, P = 0.009). Multivariate analyses identified the presence of EGV as an independent risk factor of poorer OS (hazard ratio 1.823, confidence interval 1.248-2.663, P = 0.002). Besides, fibrosis-4 scores >2.67 and albumin-bilirubin grades >1 were predictive factors for EGV occurrence.
Discussion: While the prevalence of concurrent EGV in patients with CCA was relatively low, its presence was associated with a poorer prognosis. The fibrosis-4 scores and albumin-bilirubin grades predicted the occurrence of EGV.
{"title":"The Impact of Esophagogastric Varices on the Outcomes of Patients With Cholangiocarcinoma.","authors":"Tzu-Han Ma, Yu-Jen Chen, Chun-Ting Ho, Pei-Chang Lee, Tsung-Chieh Yang, Hui-Chun Huang, Yi-Hsiang Huang, Ming-Huan Chen, Jiing-Chyuan Luo, Ming-Chih Hou, Jaw-Ching Wu, Chien-Wei Su","doi":"10.14309/ctg.0000000000000930","DOIUrl":"10.14309/ctg.0000000000000930","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Esophagogastric varices (EGV) are known to correlate with a poorer prognosis in patients with liver cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma. However, their clinical significance in patients with cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) remains unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of EGV on the outcomes of patients with CCA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study enrolled 923 consecutive treatment-naive patients diagnosed with CCA between January 2013 and December 2023. Among these, 321 patients received esophagogastroduodenoscopy at the time of CCA diagnosis. The primary end point was to assess the impact of EGV on overall survival (OS) in patients with CCA, whereas the secondary end point was to identify the predictive factors for the occurrence of EGV.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the patients analyzed, 47 (14.6%) were diagnosed with EGV by esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Among these, 39 patients did not receive primary prophylaxis for EGV bleeding and were classified as the EGV group, whereas the remaining 274 patients (85.4%) formed the non-EGV group. The median OS was shorter in the EGV group than that in the non-EGV group (182 vs 357 days, P = 0.009). Multivariate analyses identified the presence of EGV as an independent risk factor of poorer OS (hazard ratio 1.823, confidence interval 1.248-2.663, P = 0.002). Besides, fibrosis-4 scores >2.67 and albumin-bilirubin grades >1 were predictive factors for EGV occurrence.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>While the prevalence of concurrent EGV in patients with CCA was relatively low, its presence was associated with a poorer prognosis. The fibrosis-4 scores and albumin-bilirubin grades predicted the occurrence of EGV.</p>","PeriodicalId":10278,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"e00930"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12727288/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145231595","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01DOI: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000952
José Miranda-Bautista, Helena Martínez-Lozano, Marisa Di Natale, María Alejandra Mejía González, Ignacio Marín-Jiménez, Paloma Sánchez-Mateos, María Isabel Peligros Gómez, Diego Rincón, Rafael Bañares, Luis Menchén
Introduction: Up to one-third of the patients diagnosed with common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) may develop gastrointestinal (GI) and hepatic manifestations. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of enteropathy and liver disease in patients with CVID.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective study including all consecutive adult patients with CVID followed in a tertiary care center in Spain from January 1990 to January 2023. A diagnosis of CVID-associated enteropathy (CVID-E) and CVID-associated liver involvement (CVID-L) was established when objective clinical, endoscopic, histologic, radiologic or hemodynamic findings were present. Relevant prognostic outcomes and their risk factors were studied, including survival, GI infections, and GI cancer.
Results: Eighty-nine patients with confirmed CVID were included, 26 of them (29.2%) had CVID-E and 23 (25.8%) had CVID-L. Nineteen (73.1%) patients with CVID-E suffered from GI infections, while 12 (46.2%) presented concurrent liver involvement. In comparison with the rest of the cohort, patients with CVID-E had more frequently liver involvement, GI infections, and GI cancer. Multivariate analysis identified CVID-E as an independent risk factor for GI infections. Twelve (52.2%) patients with CVID-L concurrently exhibited CVID-E, and patients with CVID-L presented more CVID-E, splenomegaly, and a trend toward more GI cancer and GI infections. CVID-L and age at CVID diagnosis emerged as independent risk factors for mortality.
Discussion: GI and hepatic involvements are common in patients with CVID and frequently occur together. These manifestations significantly affect the disease course, increasing the risk of GI infections, GI malignancy, and, in the case of liver disease, mortality.
背景:多达三分之一被诊断为常见可变免疫缺陷(CVID)的患者可能会出现胃肠道(GI)和肝脏表现。本研究旨在评估肠病和肝脏疾病对CVID患者预后的意义。方法:我们进行了一项回顾性研究,包括1990年1月至2023年1月在西班牙三级保健中心随访的所有连续成人CVID患者。当客观的临床、内窥镜、组织学、放射学或血流动力学结果出现时,诊断为cvid相关性肠病(CVID-E)和cvid相关性肝脏病变(CVID-L)。研究相关预后结果及其危险因素,包括生存、胃肠道感染和胃肠道肿瘤。结果:纳入确诊CVID患者89例,其中CVID- e 26例(29.2%),CVID- l 23例(25.8%)。19例(73.1%)cvd - e患者患有胃肠道感染,12例(46.2%)并发肝脏受累。与其他队列患者相比,CVID-E患者更频繁地发生肝脏受累、胃肠道感染和胃肠道癌症。多因素分析表明,冠状病毒感染是胃肠道感染的独立危险因素。12例(52.2%)CVID-L患者同时出现CVID-E, CVID-L患者出现更多的cvid相关肠病、脾肿大,并有更多的胃肠道肿瘤和胃肠道感染的趋势。CVID- l和CVID诊断时的年龄成为死亡率的独立危险因素。结论:CVID患者常累及胃肠道和肝脏,且常同时发生。这些表现显著影响病程,增加消化道感染、消化道恶性肿瘤的风险,在肝脏疾病的情况下,增加死亡率。
{"title":"The Prognostic Impact of Enteropathy and Liver Disease in Common Variable Immunodeficiency: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"José Miranda-Bautista, Helena Martínez-Lozano, Marisa Di Natale, María Alejandra Mejía González, Ignacio Marín-Jiménez, Paloma Sánchez-Mateos, María Isabel Peligros Gómez, Diego Rincón, Rafael Bañares, Luis Menchén","doi":"10.14309/ctg.0000000000000952","DOIUrl":"10.14309/ctg.0000000000000952","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Up to one-third of the patients diagnosed with common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) may develop gastrointestinal (GI) and hepatic manifestations. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of enteropathy and liver disease in patients with CVID.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study including all consecutive adult patients with CVID followed in a tertiary care center in Spain from January 1990 to January 2023. A diagnosis of CVID-associated enteropathy (CVID-E) and CVID-associated liver involvement (CVID-L) was established when objective clinical, endoscopic, histologic, radiologic or hemodynamic findings were present. Relevant prognostic outcomes and their risk factors were studied, including survival, GI infections, and GI cancer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-nine patients with confirmed CVID were included, 26 of them (29.2%) had CVID-E and 23 (25.8%) had CVID-L. Nineteen (73.1%) patients with CVID-E suffered from GI infections, while 12 (46.2%) presented concurrent liver involvement. In comparison with the rest of the cohort, patients with CVID-E had more frequently liver involvement, GI infections, and GI cancer. Multivariate analysis identified CVID-E as an independent risk factor for GI infections. Twelve (52.2%) patients with CVID-L concurrently exhibited CVID-E, and patients with CVID-L presented more CVID-E, splenomegaly, and a trend toward more GI cancer and GI infections. CVID-L and age at CVID diagnosis emerged as independent risk factors for mortality.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>GI and hepatic involvements are common in patients with CVID and frequently occur together. These manifestations significantly affect the disease course, increasing the risk of GI infections, GI malignancy, and, in the case of liver disease, mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":10278,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145647515","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01DOI: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000939
Andrew Cannon, Rofyda Elhalaby, Igor Ban, Sheeno Thyparambil, Joe Abdo, Catherine E Hagen, Christopher P Hartley
Introduction: Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is an aggressive cancer with poor prognosis. Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a critical precursor of EAC. Patients with BE undergo endoscopic surveillance to monitor disease progression although only a small fraction develop EAC. These procedures are invasive and have limited accuracy in predicting BE progression. We evaluated the utility of an 8-protein mass spectrometry panel in predicting progression in patients with BE.
Methods: Eighty untreated controls and 20 cases were selected from our institutional tissue registry. Quantitative mass-spectrometry was performed on microdissected tissue sections. Data were split into 80% training and 20% test sets. We used Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator-regularized regression to train a logistic classifier on training data. Classifier performance was evaluated in test data.
Results: Ninety-two samples had sufficient tissue for mass spectrometry analysis (18 progressors, 74 nonprogressors). The multivariable regression model produced a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 39% in the overall cohort, with AUCs of 0.75 and 0.89 in the overall and test cohorts, respectively. Cox proportional hazards time-to-progression (TTP) showed a hazard ratio of 66.1 (95% CI 7.79-561, P = 0.00012) for the model prediction.
Discussion: The promising performance of the model generated here suggests that the test may aid in selecting patients most likely to benefit from active BE surveillance. Moreover, the association of this model's prediction with time-to-progression may offer decision support for management of patients likely to progress quickly. These results support continued development of this proteomic panel as a risk stratification tool for patients with BE.
食管腺癌(EAC)是一种侵袭性肿瘤,预后较差。巴雷特食管(BE)是EAC的重要前兆。BE患者接受内镜监测以监测疾病进展,即使只有一小部分发展为EAC。这些手术是侵入性的,预测BE进展的准确性有限。我们评估了8蛋白质谱分析在预测BE患者进展方面的效用。方法:80例未经治疗的对照和20例来自我们的机构组织登记。显微解剖组织切片进行定量质谱分析。数据被分成80%的训练集和20%的测试集。我们使用最小绝对收缩和选择算子正则化(LASSO)回归在训练数据上训练逻辑分类器。在测试数据中对分类器的性能进行了评价。结果:92份样本有足够的组织进行质谱分析(18例进展者,74例非进展者)。多变量回归模型在整个队列中的敏感性为100%,特异性为39%,在整个队列和测试队列中的auc分别为0.75和0.89。Cox比例风险-进展时间(TTP)显示模型预测的风险比为66.1 (95% CI 7.79-561, p=0.00012)。结论:这里生成的模型的良好性能表明,该测试可能有助于选择最有可能从主动BE监测中受益的患者。此外,该模型的预测与TTP的关联可能为可能快速进展的患者的管理提供决策支持。这些结果支持继续开发这种蛋白质组学面板作为BE患者的风险分层工具。
{"title":"Assessing Risk of Progression in Barrett's Esophagus Using a Mass-Spectrometry-Based Proteomic Panel.","authors":"Andrew Cannon, Rofyda Elhalaby, Igor Ban, Sheeno Thyparambil, Joe Abdo, Catherine E Hagen, Christopher P Hartley","doi":"10.14309/ctg.0000000000000939","DOIUrl":"10.14309/ctg.0000000000000939","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is an aggressive cancer with poor prognosis. Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a critical precursor of EAC. Patients with BE undergo endoscopic surveillance to monitor disease progression although only a small fraction develop EAC. These procedures are invasive and have limited accuracy in predicting BE progression. We evaluated the utility of an 8-protein mass spectrometry panel in predicting progression in patients with BE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty untreated controls and 20 cases were selected from our institutional tissue registry. Quantitative mass-spectrometry was performed on microdissected tissue sections. Data were split into 80% training and 20% test sets. We used Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator-regularized regression to train a logistic classifier on training data. Classifier performance was evaluated in test data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-two samples had sufficient tissue for mass spectrometry analysis (18 progressors, 74 nonprogressors). The multivariable regression model produced a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 39% in the overall cohort, with AUCs of 0.75 and 0.89 in the overall and test cohorts, respectively. Cox proportional hazards time-to-progression (TTP) showed a hazard ratio of 66.1 (95% CI 7.79-561, P = 0.00012) for the model prediction.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The promising performance of the model generated here suggests that the test may aid in selecting patients most likely to benefit from active BE surveillance. Moreover, the association of this model's prediction with time-to-progression may offer decision support for management of patients likely to progress quickly. These results support continued development of this proteomic panel as a risk stratification tool for patients with BE.</p>","PeriodicalId":10278,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"e00939"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12727366/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145353760","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}