Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology最新文献

Introduction: Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) and postprocedural artificial ulcers are common ulcer disease. For them, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB) are commonly used in clinical practice. PPI requires acid, time, and multiple doses, but P-CAB has fewer limitations. We compared the efficacy, safety, and prevention of PPI and P-CAB in PUD or artificial ulcer.

Methods: We searched PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov , Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for all studies. All eligible randomized controlled trials up to August 5, 2023, were included. Healing rates, shrinking rates, treatment-emergent adverse events rates, and recurrence rates were measured. Risk of bias, sensitivity analyses, and heterogeneity were also performed.

Results: Twenty researches that were selected from 926 screening studies and in total 6,551 participants were included. The risk ratio (RR) of healing rate with P-CABs vs PPIs of PUD at 4 weeks was RR 1.01 (95% confidence interval 0.98-1.04). In addition, the healing rate distinction of artificial peptic ulcer was RR 1.04 (0.89-1.22), and the shrinking rate was mean difference 0.10 (-1.30-1.51). The result of treatment-emergent adverse event rate of PUD was RR 1.11 (0.91-1.35), and the delayed bleeding rate of artificial ulcer was RR 0.35 (0.16-0.80). The RR for recurrence rate of drug-related ulcers was 0.45 (0.25-0.81).

Discussion: P-CAB is noninferior in healing artificial ulcer and PUD, also the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events. But, there may be a statistical advantage in holding back delayed bleeding and preventing drug-induced ulcers. More standardized experiments are needed for further applications and more precise conclusions.

Introduction: The advent of artificial intelligence-powered large language models capable of generating interactive responses to intricate queries marks a groundbreaking development in how patients access medical information. Our aim was to evaluate the appropriateness and readability of gastroenterological information generated by Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT).

Methods: We analyzed responses generated by ChatGPT to 16 dialog-based queries assessing symptoms and treatments for gastrointestinal conditions and 13 definition-based queries on prevalent topics in gastroenterology. Three board-certified gastroenterologists evaluated output appropriateness with a 5-point Likert-scale proxy measurement of currency, relevance, accuracy, comprehensiveness, clarity, and urgency/next steps. Outputs with a score of 4 or 5 in all 6 categories were designated as "appropriate." Output readability was assessed with Flesch Reading Ease score, Flesch-Kinkaid Reading Level, and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook scores.

Results: ChatGPT responses to 44% of the 16 dialog-based and 69% of the 13 definition-based questions were deemed appropriate, and the proportion of appropriate responses within the 2 groups of questions was not significantly different ( P = 0.17). Notably, none of ChatGPT's responses to questions related to gastrointestinal emergencies were designated appropriate. The mean readability scores showed that outputs were written at a college-level reading proficiency.

Discussion: ChatGPT can produce generally fitting responses to gastroenterological medical queries, but responses were constrained in appropriateness and readability, which limits the current utility of this large language model. Substantial development is essential before these models can be unequivocally endorsed as reliable sources of medical information.

Introduction: Despite increasing studies confirming the efficacy of vedolizumab (VDZ) in Crohn's disease (CD), improving the responses to this biologic agent remains challenging in clinical practice. In this article, we investigated the efficacy of combined treatment of VDZ and 16-week exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) in moderately to severely active CD.

Methods: From October 2020 to October 2023, 81 patients with moderately to severely active CD treated with VDZ from 2 inflammatory bowel disease centers were retrospectively selected. Forty-one patients received treatment of VDZ with concomitant 16-week EEN (VDZ + EEN cohort), and 40 patients received VDZ treatment alone (VDZ cohort). Clinical and biological outcomes were evaluated. Endoscopic response and mucosal healing were assessed by colonoscopy at weeks 16 and 52.

Results: There was no statistically significant difference between 2 groups at baseline for demographic and clinical characteristics. Compared with patients treated with VDZ alone, patients in the VDZ + EEN cohort achieved higher rates of clinical response (84.2% vs 40.0%), clinical remission (81.6% vs 30.0%), endoscopic response (91.4% vs 34.6%), including mucosal healing (85.7% vs 26.9%) at week 16. The superiority of VDZ + EEN treatment sustained in maintenance, with 76.7% (vs 33.3%) clinical response, 70.0% (vs 26.7%) clinical remission, 76.9% (vs 33.3%) endoscopic response, and 61.5% (vs 26.7%) mucosal healing at week 52. None of the patients experienced severe adverse events.

Discussion: VDZ with concomitant 16-week EEN might be an effective and optimized approach with solid efficacy in the induction and maintenance treatment of active CD.

Background: A precise model for predicting outcomes is needed to guide perioperative management. With the developments of liver transplantation (LT) discipline, previous models may become inappropriate or noncomprehensive. Thus, we aimed to develop a novel model integrating variables from donors and recipients for quick assessment of transplant outcomes.

Methods: The risk model was based on Cox regression in a randomly selected derivation cohort and verified in a validation cohort. Perioperative data and overall survival were compared between stratifications grouped by X-tile. Receiver operating characteristic curve and decision curve analysis were used to compare the models. Violin and raincloud plots were generated to present post-LT complications distributed in different stratifications.

Results: Overall, 528 patients receiving LT from 2 centers were included with 2/3 in the derivation cohort and 1/3 in the validation cohort. Cox regression analysis showed that cold ischemia time (CIT) (P=0.012) and the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) (P=0.007) score were predictors of survival. After comparison with the logarithmic models, the primitive algorithms of CIT and MELD were defined as the CIT-MELD Index (CMI). CMI was stratified by X-tile (grade 1 ≤1.06, 1.06< grade 2 ≤1.87, grade 3 >1.87). In both cohorts, CMI performed better in calculating transplant outcomes than the balance of risk score, including perioperative incidents and prevalence of complications.

Conclusions: Model integrating variables from graft and recipient made the prediction more accurate and available. CMI provided new sight in outcome evaluation and risk factor management of LT.

Introduction: Animal models indicate that hepatic insulin resistance (IR) promotes cholesterol gallstone disease (GSD). We sought to determine whether hepatic and whole-body IR is associated with incident GSD.

Methods: At baseline, 450 Southwestern Indigenous American adults without GSD were included. Participants had a 2-step hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp with glucose tracer at submaximal and maximal insulin stimulation (240 and 2,400 pmol/m 2 /min) for whole-body IR (M-low and M-high) and hepatic glucose production (HGP) before and during submaximal insulin infusion (HGP-basal and HGP-insulin). Incident GSD was identified during follow-up visits conducted at ∼2-year intervals. The associations of HGP (basal, insulin, and % suppression), M-low, and M-high with risk of GSD were assessed by Cox regression models adjusted for age, sex, body fat (%), glucose, and insulin.

Results: Sixty participants (13%) developed GSD (median follow-up: 11.6 years). Participants who developed GSD were of similar age and whole-body IR as those who did not ( P 's > 0.07) but were more likely to be female; have higher body fat, higher HGP-basal, and HGP-insulin; and lower % suppression of HGP ( P 's < 0.02). In separate adjusted models, higher HGP-insulin and lower % suppression of HGP were associated with increased risk for GSD (hazard ratio [HR] per SD: HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.12-1.69, P = 0.002; HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.16-1.72, P = 0.0007). HGP-basal, M-low, and M-high were not associated with GSD in adjusted models ( P 's > 0.22).

Discussion: Resistance to insulin suppression of HGP increases risk for GSD. Hepatic IR is a link between GSD and other conditions of the metabolic syndrome.

Introduction: Refractory pain is a major clinical problem in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and chronic pancreatitis (CP). New, effective therapies to reduce pain are urgently needed. Intravenous lidocaine is used in clinical practice in patients with PDAC and CP, but its efficacy has not been studied prospectively.

Methods: Multicentre prospective non-randomized pilot study including patients with moderate or severe pain (NRS ≥ 4) associated with PDAC or CP in 5 Dutch centers. An intravenous lidocaine bolus of 1.5mg/kg, was followed by continuous infusion at 1.5 mg/kg/hour. The dose was raised every 15 minutes until treatment response (up to a maximum 2mg/kg/hour) and consecutively administered for two hours. Primary outcome was the mean difference in pain severity, pre-infusion and the first day after (Brief Pain Inventory [BPI] scale 1-10). A BPI decrease ≥ 1.3 points was considered clinically relevant.

Results: Overall, 30 patients were included, 19 with PDAC (63%) and 11 with CP (37%). The mean difference in BPI at day one was 1.1 (SD±1.3) points for patients with PDAC and 0.5 (SD±1.7) for CP patients. A clinically relevant decrease in BPI on day one was reported in 9/29 patients (31%), this response lasted up to one month. No serious complications were reported, and only three minor complications (vertigo, nausea, tingling of mouth). Treatment with lidocaine did not impact quality of life.

Conclusion: Intravenous lidocaine in patients with painful PDAC and CP did not show an overall clinically relevant reduction of pain. However, this pilot study shows that the treatment is feasible in this patient group, and had a positive effect in a third of patients which lasted up to a month with only minor side effects. To prove or exclude the efficacy of intravenous lidocaine, the study should be performed in a study with a greater sample size and less heterogeneous patient group.

Introduction: Chronic Pancreatitis Prognosis Score (COPPS) was developed to discriminate disease severity and predict risk for future hospitalizations. In this cohort study, we evaluated if COPPS predicts the likelihood of hospitalization(s) in an American cohort.

Methods: The Chronic Pancreatitis, Diabetes, and Pancreatic Cancer consortium provided data and serum from subjects with chronic pancreatitis (N = 279). COPPS was calculated with baseline data and stratified by severity (low, moderate, and high). Primary endpoints included number and duration of hospitalizations during 12-month follow-up.

Results: The mean ± SD COPPS was 8.4 ± 1.6. COPPS correlated with all primary outcomes: hospitalizations for any reason (number: r = 0.15, P = 0.01; duration: r = 0.16, P = 0.01) and pancreas-related hospitalizations (number: r = 0.15, P = 0.02; duration: r = 0.13, P = 0.04). The severity distribution was 13.3% low, 66.0% moderate, and 20.8% high. 37.6% of subjects had ≥1 hospitalization(s) for any reason; 32.2% had ≥1 pancreas-related hospitalizations. All primary outcomes were significantly different between severity groups: hospitalizations for any reason (number, P = 0.004; duration, P = 0.007) and pancreas-related hospitalizations (number, P = 0.02; duration, P = 0.04). The prevalence of continued drinking at follow-up ( P = 0.04) was higher in the low and moderate groups. The prevalence of anxiety at enrollment ( P = 0.02) and follow-up ( P < 0.05) was higher in the moderate and high groups.

Discussion: Statistically, COPPS significantly correlated with hospitalization outcomes, but the correlations were weaker than in previous studies, which may be related to the outpatient nature of the PROspective Evaluation of Chronic Pancreatitis for EpidEmiologic and Translational StuDies cohort and lower prevalence of high severity disease. Studies in other prospective cohorts are needed to understand the full utility of COPPS as a potential tool for clinical risk assessment and intervention.

Introduction: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are predisposed to the reactivation of viral infections such as cytomegalovirus (CMV). Clinical discrimination of disease flares and colonic CMV reactivation is difficult in patients with established diagnosis of IBD, and there are no reliable noninvasive diagnostic tools yet. Furthermore, the influence of novel therapeutics including biologicals and Janus kinase inhibitors on the risk of CMV colitis is unclear. The goal of this study was to identify risk factors and clinical determinants of CMV colitis that could serve as minimally invasive markers both for active CMV colitis and relapse.

Methods: To this end, a retrospective analysis of 376 patients with suspected or confirmed CMV colitis 2016-2023 was performed.

Results: Previous administration of systemic steroids increased the odds of CMV colitis to OR 4.6. Biologicals did not change the incidence of CMV colitis but decreased the OR of a relapse to 0.13. Clinical parameters such as severely bloody diarrhea, intense microscopic ulcerative damage, and decreased serum tryptophan correlated with detection of CMV. Importantly, persistent decrease of tryptophan was observed in patients with CMV relapse. Furthermore, tryptophan degradation through the kynurenine pathway was increased in CMV-positive patients.

Discussion: Taken together, we identify decreased serum tryptophan as a novel potential minimally invasive marker to aid identification of IBD patients with active CMV colitis and at high risk for relapse.

Introduction: This proof-of-concept, open-label phase 1b study evaluated the safety and efficacy of cilofexor, a potent selective farnesoid X receptor agonist, in patients with compensated cirrhosis due to primary sclerosing cholangitis.

Methods: Escalating doses of cilofexor (30 mg [weeks 1-4], 60 mg [weeks 5-8], 100 mg [weeks 9-12]) were administered orally once daily over 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was safety. Exploratory measures included cholestasis and fibrosis markers and pharmacodynamic biomarkers of bile acid homeostasis.

Results: Eleven patients were enrolled (median age: 48 years; 55% men). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were pruritus (8/11 [72.7%]), fatigue, headache, nausea, and upper respiratory tract infection (2/11 [18.2%] each). Seven patients experienced a pruritus TEAE (one grade 3) considered drug-related. One patient temporarily discontinued cilofexor owing to peripheral edema. There were no deaths, serious TEAEs, or TEAEs leading to permanent discontinuation. Median changes (interquartile ranges) from baseline to week 12 (predose, fasting) were -24.8% (-35.7 to -7.4) for alanine transaminase, -13.0% (-21.9 to -8.6) for alkaline phosphatase, -43.5% (-52.1 to -30.8) for γ-glutamyl transferase, -12.7% (-25.0 to 0.0) for total bilirubin, and -21.2% (-40.0 to 0.0) for direct bilirubin. Least-squares mean percentage change (95% confidence interval) from baseline to week 12 at trough was -55.3% (-70.8 to -31.6) for C4 and -60.5% (-81.8 to -14.2) for cholic acid. Fasting fibroblast growth factor 19 levels transiently increased after cilofexor administration.

Discussion: Escalating doses of cilofexor over 12 weeks were well tolerated and improved cholestasis markers in patients with compensated cirrhosis due to primary sclerosing cholangitis (NCT04060147).

Introduction: Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis are characterized by chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract. Mucosal healing (MH) is a therapeutic goal in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Current data suggest that Black patients may experience worse clinical outcomes than White patients with IBD. This study assessed MH between Black and White patients with IBD.

Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed on Black and White adults with IBD who were hospitalized for an active flare. The presence of MH was assessed at 6-18 months after hospitalization. IBD treatments received before and during hospitalization, within 6 months, and 6-18 months after discharge were recorded. C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were collected at hospitalization and 6-18 months after discharge; the difference was reported as delta CRP.

Results: One hundred nine patients were followed up after hospitalization. Of those 88 (80.7%) were White patients, and 21 (19.3%) were Black patients. White and Black patients received similar proportions of IBD treatment before ( P = 0.2) and during ( P = 0.6) hospitalization, within 6 months ( P = 0.1), and 6-18 months ( P = 0.1) after discharge. Black patients achieved numerically higher rates of MH (15/21 = 71.4% vs 53/88 = 60.2%, P = 0.3) and delta CRP ( P = 0.2) than White patients, however, not statistically significant.

Discussion: In patients admitted to the hospital with an IBD flare with similar treatment and care, there was a trend toward higher rates of MH in Black patients compared with White patients. These data suggest that MH is likely not the only factor that is associated with Black patients experiencing worse clinical outcomes when compared with White patients.