Pub Date : 2026-02-17DOI: 10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps4-03-03
N. Lopetegui-Lia, A. Davenport, J. Gill, A. M. Roy, S. Myers, D. Agnese, E. Burke, T. Y. Andraos, D. M. Schimming, S. Hulett, H. LeFebvre, M. Gatti-Mays, D. Stover
Background The rising incidence of Breast cancer (BC) in young women requires further genomic characterization, as only a fraction carry a germline mutation. Given the growing interest in therapies targeting the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/AKT (PI3K/AKT), mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), and phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) pathways, central to BC pathogenesis, we evaluated whether PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway alterations and gene expression differed by age at BC diagnosis. Methods: In this analysis of patients’ tumor/germline whole exome DNA and RNA sequencing data from the Ohio State University Total Cancer Care registry, 71 profiled patients were young adults (YA) aged < 40 years, and 675 were non-YA aged ≥40 years. Descriptive statistics characterized the frequency and co-occurrence of BC-specific alterations and mRNA expression profiles by age groups. Results The prevalence of these BC-relevant mutations are reported in Table 1 Table: Prevalence of BC-relevant mutations by age cohort Mutation Age Group % of Patients with Mutation Fisher's Exact Test p-value (<40 vs ≥ 40) PIK3CA <40 16.9% (12/71) 0.0002 ≥ 40 39% (263/675) AKT1 <40 5.6% (4/71) 0.220 ≥40 10.8% (73/675) mTOR <40 16.9% (12/71) 0.450 ≥40 21.5% (145/675) PTEN <40 12.7% (9/71) 0.550 ≥40 10.5% (71/675) . PIK3CA mutation occurred more frequently in non-YA patients (16.9% YA versus (vs) 39% non-YA; p<0.0002). The frequency of driver mutations were similar between cohorts (73% in YA vs 82% in non-YA). Most hotspot mutations were enriched in non-YA group, particularly H1047R (15.11% n=102 non-YA vs 4.23%, n=3 YA; p= 0.01). Others include: E545K (6.52%, n=44 vs 2.82%, n=2, p=0.302), E542K (4.59%, n=31 vs 1.41%, n=1; p=0.352); H1047L (1.93%, n=13 vs none, p=0.625) and N345K (1.78%, n=12 vs 1.41% n=1; p=1.00). There were no age-based differences in AKT1 mutation (5.6% YA vs 10.8% non-YA patients; p=0.220). Hotspot alterations E17K, E17G, and L52R were numerically enriched, albeit nonsignificant, in non-YA. There were no significant differences in the presence of mTOR by age (16.9% YA and 21.5% non-YA; p=0.450). Most alterations in both groups were variants of unknown significance (17/17 in YA, 157/159 in non-YA). YA and non-YA cohorts had similar frequency of PTEN mutations (12.7% YA vs 10.5% non-YA; p=0.550). The proportion of PTEN driver mutations also did not differ (82% YA and 93% non-YA). Conclusion PIK3CA mutations were more prevalent among non-YAs highlighting potential age-associated oncogenic drivers. Although AKT1, mTOR, and PTEN gene mutations did not differ between age groups, in general, oncogenic/hotspot mutations occurred more frequently in patients ≥40 years. As management of BC evolves to incorporate PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors, age-specific somatic alterations may uncover therapeutic vulnerabilities and inform customized treatment. Citation Format: N. Lopetegui-Lia, A. Davenport, J. Gill, A. M. Roy, S. Myers, D. Agnese, E. Bur
背景:年轻女性乳腺癌(BC)发病率的上升需要进一步的基因组鉴定,因为只有一小部分携带种系突变。鉴于针对磷酸肌肽3-激酶/AKT (PI3K/AKT)、哺乳动物雷帕霉素靶点(mTOR)以及磷酸酶和紧张素同源物(PTEN)途径的治疗日益受到关注,这些途径是BC发病机制的核心,我们评估了PI3K/AKT/mTOR途径的改变和基因表达在BC诊断时是否因年龄而异。方法:在对来自俄亥俄州立大学总癌症护理登记处的患者肿瘤/种系全外显子组DNA和RNA测序数据进行分析时,71例被分析的患者是年轻成人(YA)和年龄(<;≥40岁的非ya患者675例。描述性统计描述了bc特异性改变的频率和共发生情况,以及不同年龄组的mRNA表达谱。表1报告了这些bc相关突变的流行情况。表1:按年龄队列划分的bc相关突变的流行情况突变年龄组突变患者的百分比Fisher精确检验p值(<40 vs≥40)≥40 39% (263/675)AKT1 <;≥40 10.8% (73/675)mTOR <;≥40 21.5% (145/675)PTEN <;0.550≥40 10.5%(71/675)。PIK3CA突变在非YA患者中更常见(YA患者为16.9%,非YA患者为39%;p&肝移植;0.0002)。各组之间驱动突变的频率相似(YA组为73%,非YA组为82%)。热点突变在非YA组以H1047R最为富集(15.11% n=102非YA vs 4.23%, n=3 YA; p= 0.01)。其他包括:E545K (6.52%, n=44 vs 2.82%, n=2, p=0.302), E542K (4.59%, n=31 vs 1.41%, n=1, p=0.352);H1047L (1.93%, n=13 vs无,p=0.625)和N345K (1.78%, n=12 vs 1.41%, n=1; p=1.00)。AKT1突变无年龄差异(YA患者5.6% vs非YA患者10.8%;p=0.220)。热点变化E17K、E17G和L52R在非ya中数值丰富,尽管不显著。mTOR的年龄差异无统计学意义(16.9%为YA, 21.5%为非YA; p=0.450)。两组的大多数改变都是未知意义的变异(YA组17/17,非YA组157/159)。YA组和非YA组的PTEN突变频率相似(YA组12.7% vs非YA组10.5%;p=0.550)。PTEN驱动突变的比例也没有差异(82%的YA和93%的非YA)。结论PIK3CA突变在非yas患者中更为普遍,突出了潜在的年龄相关致癌因素。虽然AKT1、mTOR和PTEN基因突变在不同年龄组之间没有差异,但总体而言,≥40岁的患者发生致癌/热点突变的频率更高。随着BC的管理逐渐纳入PI3K/AKT/mTOR抑制剂,年龄特异性的体细胞改变可能会发现治疗漏洞,并为定制治疗提供信息。引文格式:N. Lopetegui-Lia, A. Davenport, J. Gill, A. M. Roy, S. Myers, D. Agnese, E. Burke, T. Y. Andraos, D. M. Schimming, S. Hulett, H. LeFebvre, M. Gatti-Mays, D. Stover。年龄驱动的乳腺癌基因组差异:与pi3k通路的相关性[摘要]。摘自:《2025年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集》;2025年12月9-12日;费城(PA): AACR;临床癌症杂志2026;32(4增刊):nr PS4-03-03。
{"title":"Abstract PS4-03-03: Age-driven genomic differences in breast cancer: relevance for PI3K-pathway","authors":"N. Lopetegui-Lia, A. Davenport, J. Gill, A. M. Roy, S. Myers, D. Agnese, E. Burke, T. Y. Andraos, D. M. Schimming, S. Hulett, H. LeFebvre, M. Gatti-Mays, D. Stover","doi":"10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps4-03-03","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps4-03-03","url":null,"abstract":"Background The rising incidence of Breast cancer (BC) in young women requires further genomic characterization, as only a fraction carry a germline mutation. Given the growing interest in therapies targeting the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/AKT (PI3K/AKT), mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), and phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) pathways, central to BC pathogenesis, we evaluated whether PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway alterations and gene expression differed by age at BC diagnosis. Methods: In this analysis of patients’ tumor/germline whole exome DNA and RNA sequencing data from the Ohio State University Total Cancer Care registry, 71 profiled patients were young adults (YA) aged &lt; 40 years, and 675 were non-YA aged ≥40 years. Descriptive statistics characterized the frequency and co-occurrence of BC-specific alterations and mRNA expression profiles by age groups. Results The prevalence of these BC-relevant mutations are reported in Table 1 Table: Prevalence of BC-relevant mutations by age cohort Mutation Age Group % of Patients with Mutation Fisher's Exact Test p-value (&lt;40 vs ≥ 40) PIK3CA &lt;40 16.9% (12/71) 0.0002 ≥ 40 39% (263/675) AKT1 &lt;40 5.6% (4/71) 0.220 ≥40 10.8% (73/675) mTOR &lt;40 16.9% (12/71) 0.450 ≥40 21.5% (145/675) PTEN &lt;40 12.7% (9/71) 0.550 ≥40 10.5% (71/675) . PIK3CA mutation occurred more frequently in non-YA patients (16.9% YA versus (vs) 39% non-YA; p&lt;0.0002). The frequency of driver mutations were similar between cohorts (73% in YA vs 82% in non-YA). Most hotspot mutations were enriched in non-YA group, particularly H1047R (15.11% n=102 non-YA vs 4.23%, n=3 YA; p= 0.01). Others include: E545K (6.52%, n=44 vs 2.82%, n=2, p=0.302), E542K (4.59%, n=31 vs 1.41%, n=1; p=0.352); H1047L (1.93%, n=13 vs none, p=0.625) and N345K (1.78%, n=12 vs 1.41% n=1; p=1.00). There were no age-based differences in AKT1 mutation (5.6% YA vs 10.8% non-YA patients; p=0.220). Hotspot alterations E17K, E17G, and L52R were numerically enriched, albeit nonsignificant, in non-YA. There were no significant differences in the presence of mTOR by age (16.9% YA and 21.5% non-YA; p=0.450). Most alterations in both groups were variants of unknown significance (17/17 in YA, 157/159 in non-YA). YA and non-YA cohorts had similar frequency of PTEN mutations (12.7% YA vs 10.5% non-YA; p=0.550). The proportion of PTEN driver mutations also did not differ (82% YA and 93% non-YA). Conclusion PIK3CA mutations were more prevalent among non-YAs highlighting potential age-associated oncogenic drivers. Although AKT1, mTOR, and PTEN gene mutations did not differ between age groups, in general, oncogenic/hotspot mutations occurred more frequently in patients ≥40 years. As management of BC evolves to incorporate PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors, age-specific somatic alterations may uncover therapeutic vulnerabilities and inform customized treatment. Citation Format: N. Lopetegui-Lia, A. Davenport, J. Gill, A. M. Roy, S. Myers, D. Agnese, E. Bur","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":"94 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146205194","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-17DOI: 10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps1-09-13
J. K. Plichta, V. Rey, M. Blasingame, S. Luo, S. M. Thomas
Background: Breast cancer staging is a foundational component for determining prognosis, and multiple methods have been used to create staging guidelines. However, it remains unclear which statistical approach is best. As such, we sought to compare 3 methods for developing staging guidelines, using de novo metastatic breast cancer (dnMBC) as an example. Methods: Patients with dnMBC in the National Cancer Database (2010-2022) were identified (N=48,832). Variables used for staging included clinical T-category, grade, ER, PR, HER2, histology, bone-only metastases, brain-only metastases, visceral metastases, and number of metastatic sites. Stage groups were assigned based on 3-year overall survival (OS) rates: stage group IVA >70%, IVB 50-70%, IVC 25-<50%, and IVD <25%. Statistical methods: (1) We conducted an analysis of all possible variable combinations (AC), yielding 643 unique characteristic profiles; OS was estimated via Kaplan-Meier, which was used to assign a subgroup (IVA-D). (2) Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) grouped patients with similar OS based on these same disease characteristics; 3-year OS rates were estimated for each terminal node; subgroups (IVA-D) were assigned. (3) Bootstrapping was used; the RPA was repeated 1000 times (B-RPA); subgroups (IVA-D) were determined based on the subgroup each profile fell into most often. Overall, patients were categorized as stage IVA-D based on these 3 methods (AC, RPA, B-RPA), resulting in 3 stage group assignments. Differences in stage group assignments were classified as minor (1 group) or major (>1 group). Performance metrics (Akaike Information Criterion, AIC) were compared. Results: Application of the 3 methods yielded similar findings (Table), although the AC analysis had the best performance (lowest AIC), followed by the B-RPA and RPA. Patient-level Comparison (N=48,832). The same stage group (IVA-D) was assigned to 87.8% of patients by all 3 methods. Comparing B-RPA to AC, 10.6% of patients had a minor stage discrepancy and 0.4% had a major discrepancy. The RPA compared similarly to AC (10.9% minor, 0.4% major). Profile-level Comparison (N=643). Comparing B-RPA to AC, there was 60.7% agreement in stage assignments, 31.4% minor discrepancies, and 6.8% major discrepancies. Comparing RPA to AC was similar (60.8% agreement, 30.8% minor, 7.3% major). Of the 160 most common profiles, there was 85% agreement for both B-RPA and RPA. Of the 160 least common characteristic profiles, there was only 36.3% and 36.9% agreement for the B-RPA and RPA, respectively. Conclusions: Although the AC analysis had the best performance, there was a high level of agreement in stage assignment at the patient level. Potentially due to smaller patient samples in some profile subgroups, there was a moderate degree of discrepancies at the profile level, although most were minor. These findings will help inform future staging guideline development. Citation Format: J. K. Plichta, V. Rey
背景:乳腺癌分期是确定预后的基础组成部分,多种方法已被用于制定分期指南。然而,目前尚不清楚哪种统计方法是最好的。因此,我们以新发转移性乳腺癌(dnMBC)为例,试图比较3种制定分期指南的方法。方法:选取国家癌症数据库(2010-2022)中的dnMBC患者(N=48,832)。用于分期的变量包括临床t分类、分级、ER、PR、HER2、组织学、仅骨转移、仅脑转移、内脏转移和转移部位数量。根据3年总生存率(OS)划分分期组:分期组IVA &;gt;70%, IVB 50-70%, IVC 25- lt;50% IVD <25%。统计方法:(1)对所有可能的变量组合(AC)进行了分析,得到了643个独特的特征剖面;通过Kaplan-Meier估计OS,并使用该方法分配亚组(IVA-D)。(2)递归划分分析(RPA)基于这些相同的疾病特征对相似OS患者进行分组;估计每个终端节点的3年OS率;分组(IVA-D)。(3)采用Bootstrapping;RPA重复1000次(B-RPA);子组(IVA-D)是根据每个剖面最常进入的子组来确定的。总体而言,根据这3种方法(AC, RPA, B-RPA)将患者分为IVA-D期,从而进行3个阶段分组。阶段组作业的差异分为次要组(1组)或主要组(1组)。比较绩效指标(赤池信息标准,AIC)。结果:3种方法的应用结果相似(表),但AC分析的效果最好(AIC最低),其次是B-RPA和RPA。患者水平比较(N=48,832)。三种方法均将87.8%的患者划分为同一分期组(IVA-D)。将B-RPA与AC进行比较,10.6%的患者有轻微的分期差异,0.4%的患者有严重的分期差异。RPA与AC比较相似(10.9%为次要,0.4%为主要)。档案级别的比较(N=643)。B-RPA与AC比较,60.7%的阶段分配一致,31.4%的差异较小,6.8%的差异较大。RPA与AC比较相似(60.8%一致,30.8%轻微,7.3%严重)。在160个最常见的特征中,B-RPA和RPA都有85%的一致性。在160个最不常见的特征谱中,B-RPA和RPA的一致性分别只有36.3%和36.9%。结论:尽管AC分析具有最好的性能,但在患者水平上,在分期分配方面存在高度的一致性。可能是由于在某些概况亚组中患者样本较小,在概况水平上存在中等程度的差异,尽管大多数是轻微的。这些发现将有助于指导未来分期指南的制定。引文格式:J. K. Plichta, V. Rey, M. Blasingame, S. Luo, S. M. Thomas转移性乳腺癌分期指南的发展:哪种方法是最好的?[摘要]。摘自:《2025年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集》;2025年12月9-12日;费城(PA): AACR;临床癌症杂志2026;32(4增刊):nr PS1-09-13。
{"title":"Abstract PS1-09-13: Development of Staging Guidelines for Metastatic Breast Cancer: Which method is best?","authors":"J. K. Plichta, V. Rey, M. Blasingame, S. Luo, S. M. Thomas","doi":"10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps1-09-13","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps1-09-13","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Breast cancer staging is a foundational component for determining prognosis, and multiple methods have been used to create staging guidelines. However, it remains unclear which statistical approach is best. As such, we sought to compare 3 methods for developing staging guidelines, using de novo metastatic breast cancer (dnMBC) as an example. Methods: Patients with dnMBC in the National Cancer Database (2010-2022) were identified (N=48,832). Variables used for staging included clinical T-category, grade, ER, PR, HER2, histology, bone-only metastases, brain-only metastases, visceral metastases, and number of metastatic sites. Stage groups were assigned based on 3-year overall survival (OS) rates: stage group IVA &gt;70%, IVB 50-70%, IVC 25-&lt;50%, and IVD &lt;25%. Statistical methods: (1) We conducted an analysis of all possible variable combinations (AC), yielding 643 unique characteristic profiles; OS was estimated via Kaplan-Meier, which was used to assign a subgroup (IVA-D). (2) Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) grouped patients with similar OS based on these same disease characteristics; 3-year OS rates were estimated for each terminal node; subgroups (IVA-D) were assigned. (3) Bootstrapping was used; the RPA was repeated 1000 times (B-RPA); subgroups (IVA-D) were determined based on the subgroup each profile fell into most often. Overall, patients were categorized as stage IVA-D based on these 3 methods (AC, RPA, B-RPA), resulting in 3 stage group assignments. Differences in stage group assignments were classified as minor (1 group) or major (&gt;1 group). Performance metrics (Akaike Information Criterion, AIC) were compared. Results: Application of the 3 methods yielded similar findings (Table), although the AC analysis had the best performance (lowest AIC), followed by the B-RPA and RPA. Patient-level Comparison (N=48,832). The same stage group (IVA-D) was assigned to 87.8% of patients by all 3 methods. Comparing B-RPA to AC, 10.6% of patients had a minor stage discrepancy and 0.4% had a major discrepancy. The RPA compared similarly to AC (10.9% minor, 0.4% major). Profile-level Comparison (N=643). Comparing B-RPA to AC, there was 60.7% agreement in stage assignments, 31.4% minor discrepancies, and 6.8% major discrepancies. Comparing RPA to AC was similar (60.8% agreement, 30.8% minor, 7.3% major). Of the 160 most common profiles, there was 85% agreement for both B-RPA and RPA. Of the 160 least common characteristic profiles, there was only 36.3% and 36.9% agreement for the B-RPA and RPA, respectively. Conclusions: Although the AC analysis had the best performance, there was a high level of agreement in stage assignment at the patient level. Potentially due to smaller patient samples in some profile subgroups, there was a moderate degree of discrepancies at the profile level, although most were minor. These findings will help inform future staging guideline development. Citation Format: J. K. Plichta, V. Rey","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146205199","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-17DOI: 10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps1-10-23
J. O'Shaughnessy, M. Rehnquist, N. Sadetsky, W. Verret, P. Cinar, N. Sjekloca, L. Nguyen, R. Nanda, P. Sharma
Background: Patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (immunohistochemistry 0, 1+, or 2+/in situ hybridization-negative) metastatic breast cancer (HR+/HER2- mBC) are treated with endocrine therapy (ET) ± CDK4/6 inhibitor as the preferred option in the first-line setting followed by ET ± targeted therapy. Most HR+ disease will eventually become ET resistant, at which point treatment is primarily limited to cytotoxic therapy. This study describes characteristics, treatment patterns, and real-world outcomes among patients with HR+/HER2- mBC in the post ET-based treatment setting. Methods: This retrospective, observational cohort study utilized electronic health record-derived de-identified data from the US nationwide Flatiron Health Research Database. Women aged ≥ 18 years with HR+/HER2- mBC who received post ET-based treatment from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2024 were included. Patient characteristics, treatment patterns, time to next treatment or death (TTNTD), and real-world overall survival (rwOS) were described; rwOS was assessed by Kaplan-Meier methods. Results: 5012 patients were included, with a median age of 63 years at mBC diagnosis. Most were Caucasian (62%), treated in the community setting (82%), had ECOG PS 0-1 (78%) at start of first post ET-based treatment, were diagnosed with recurrent mBC (68%), and had ≥ 2 prior lines of ET-based treatment in the mBC setting (65%) The median time from mBC diagnosis to first post ET-based treatment was 19 months. The median follow-up after the first post ET-based treatment in the mBC setting was 12 months. Ninety-six percent of patients received chemotherapy-based regimens as their first post ET-based treatment; capecitabine monotherapy was the most prescribed chemotherapy (34%) followed by taxane monotherapy (18%). Thirty percent of patients who initiated a post ET-based treatment did not survive to the next line of treatment. The median (95% CI) rwOS from start of first post ET-based treatment was 13.4 (12.9-13.9) months. There was a decrease in median (95% CI) rwOS with each subsequent line of treatment, ranging from 10.7 (10.2-11.1) months (second post ET-based treatment) to 7.4 (6.4-8.6) months (fifth post ET-based treatment) (Table). Similar trends were observed for TTNTD. Conclusions: These findings establish the high unmet need in patients with HR+/HER2- mBC treated with the standard of care regimens following ET-based treatment. For these patients, options are limited primarily to chemotherapy, with almost one-third not surviving to receive the second line of post ET-based treatment. This highlights the importance of making the most robust agents available for this patient population and demonstrates a clear and urgent need for new effective treatments in this setting. Citation Format: J. O'Shaughnessy, M. Rehnquist, N. Sadetsky, W. Verret, P. Cinar, N. Sjekloca, L. Nguyen, R. Nanda, P. Sharma. Real-world analysis of unmet need among pa
背景:激素受体阳性/人表皮生长因子受体2阴性(免疫组织化学0、1+或2+/原位杂交阴性)转移性乳腺癌(HR+/HER2- mBC)患者在一线首选内分泌治疗(ET)±CDK4/6抑制剂,然后是ET±靶向治疗。大多数HR+疾病最终会对ET产生耐药性,此时治疗主要局限于细胞毒性治疗。本研究描述了在以et为基础的治疗环境中HR+/HER2- mBC患者的特征、治疗模式和现实世界的结果。方法:这项回顾性、观察性队列研究利用了来自美国全国Flatiron健康研究数据库的电子健康记录数据。纳入2015年1月1日至2024年12月31日期间接受et后治疗的年龄≥18岁的HR+/HER2- mBC女性。描述患者特征、治疗模式、到下次治疗或死亡的时间(TTNTD)和真实世界总生存期(rwOS);采用Kaplan-Meier法评价rwOS。结果:纳入5012例患者,诊断时中位年龄为63岁。大多数是白人(62%),在社区环境中接受治疗(82%),在首次基于et的治疗开始时ECOG PS为0-1(78%),被诊断为复发性mBC(68%),并且在mBC环境中有≥2个基于et的治疗线(65%)。从mBC诊断到首次基于et的治疗后的中位时间为19个月。在mBC环境中,首次以et为基础的治疗后的中位随访时间为12个月。96%的患者接受了基于化疗的方案作为他们的第一次基于et的治疗;卡培他滨单药治疗是处方最多的化疗(34%),其次是紫杉烷单药治疗(18%)。30%的患者在接受et治疗后无法存活到下一轮治疗。从第一次基于et的治疗开始的中位(95% CI) rwOS为13.4(12.9-13.9)个月。每条后续治疗线的rwOS中位数(95% CI)均有所下降,从10.7(10.2-11.1)个月(第二次基于et的治疗)到7.4(6.4-8.6)个月(第五次基于et的治疗)(表)。TTNTD也有类似的趋势。结论:这些研究结果表明,在以et为基础的治疗后,接受标准护理方案治疗的HR+/HER2- mBC患者的高未满足需求。对于这些患者,选择主要限于化疗,几乎三分之一的患者无法存活到接受基于et的二线治疗。这突出了为这一患者群体提供最强大的药物的重要性,并表明了在这一背景下对新的有效治疗方法的明确和迫切需求。引用格式:J. O'Shaughnessy, M. Rehnquist, N. Sadetsky, W. Verret, P. Cinar, N. Sjekloca, L. Nguyen, R. Nanda, P. Sharma。美国HR+/HER2- mBC患者内分泌治疗后未满足需求的现实分析[摘要]。摘自:《2025年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集》;2025年12月9-12日;费城(PA): AACR;临床癌症杂志2026;32(4增刊):nr PS1-10-23。
{"title":"Abstract PS1-10-23: Real-world analysis of unmet need among patients in the US with HR+/HER2- mBC following endocrine therapy","authors":"J. O'Shaughnessy, M. Rehnquist, N. Sadetsky, W. Verret, P. Cinar, N. Sjekloca, L. Nguyen, R. Nanda, P. Sharma","doi":"10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps1-10-23","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps1-10-23","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (immunohistochemistry 0, 1+, or 2+/in situ hybridization-negative) metastatic breast cancer (HR+/HER2- mBC) are treated with endocrine therapy (ET) ± CDK4/6 inhibitor as the preferred option in the first-line setting followed by ET ± targeted therapy. Most HR+ disease will eventually become ET resistant, at which point treatment is primarily limited to cytotoxic therapy. This study describes characteristics, treatment patterns, and real-world outcomes among patients with HR+/HER2- mBC in the post ET-based treatment setting. Methods: This retrospective, observational cohort study utilized electronic health record-derived de-identified data from the US nationwide Flatiron Health Research Database. Women aged ≥ 18 years with HR+/HER2- mBC who received post ET-based treatment from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2024 were included. Patient characteristics, treatment patterns, time to next treatment or death (TTNTD), and real-world overall survival (rwOS) were described; rwOS was assessed by Kaplan-Meier methods. Results: 5012 patients were included, with a median age of 63 years at mBC diagnosis. Most were Caucasian (62%), treated in the community setting (82%), had ECOG PS 0-1 (78%) at start of first post ET-based treatment, were diagnosed with recurrent mBC (68%), and had ≥ 2 prior lines of ET-based treatment in the mBC setting (65%) The median time from mBC diagnosis to first post ET-based treatment was 19 months. The median follow-up after the first post ET-based treatment in the mBC setting was 12 months. Ninety-six percent of patients received chemotherapy-based regimens as their first post ET-based treatment; capecitabine monotherapy was the most prescribed chemotherapy (34%) followed by taxane monotherapy (18%). Thirty percent of patients who initiated a post ET-based treatment did not survive to the next line of treatment. The median (95% CI) rwOS from start of first post ET-based treatment was 13.4 (12.9-13.9) months. There was a decrease in median (95% CI) rwOS with each subsequent line of treatment, ranging from 10.7 (10.2-11.1) months (second post ET-based treatment) to 7.4 (6.4-8.6) months (fifth post ET-based treatment) (Table). Similar trends were observed for TTNTD. Conclusions: These findings establish the high unmet need in patients with HR+/HER2- mBC treated with the standard of care regimens following ET-based treatment. For these patients, options are limited primarily to chemotherapy, with almost one-third not surviving to receive the second line of post ET-based treatment. This highlights the importance of making the most robust agents available for this patient population and demonstrates a clear and urgent need for new effective treatments in this setting. Citation Format: J. O'Shaughnessy, M. Rehnquist, N. Sadetsky, W. Verret, P. Cinar, N. Sjekloca, L. Nguyen, R. Nanda, P. Sharma. Real-world analysis of unmet need among pa","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146205201","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-17DOI: 10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps1-13-23
C. Nangia, S. Chumsri, K. Rowland, L. Negret, J. Knecth, B. Bayer, T. Aghajanian, W. Williams, G. Del Priore, C. Calfa
Background Management of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) continues to present obstacles, as many pts develop resistance to or cannot tolerate standard of care treatments. Bria-IMT combines two modalities to both overcome immune exhaustion and minimize the toxic safety profiles commonly observed in contemporary late stage therapies: an allogeneic whole-cell vaccine (SV-BR-1-GM) and checkpoint inhibition (CPI). The SV-BR-1-GM cell line originates from breast cancer cells and are engineered to secrete GM-CSF and irradiated before administration. These cells upregulate surface presentation of tumor associated antigens on both HLA class I and II, enhancing tumor recognition by T cells. Coadministration w/ an anti-PD-1 CPI, the vaccine response is reinforced, counteracting the immuno-suppressive tumor microenvironment. Methods This phase I/II study evaluated the Bria-IMT regimen: low-dose cyclophosphamide (Day –2) followed by SV-BR-1-GM and CPI (pembrolizumab or retifanlimab), then low-dose local peg- interferon α. Cycles q3w. In the phase II study, pts were randomized 1:1 to start CPI immediately at cycle 1 (C1) or delayed start at cycle 2 (C2). There were 2 formulations of SV-BR-1-GM w/ IFNγ stimulation (IFNγ) or unstimulated (PH3). Cancer-associated macrophage-like cells (CAMLs), circulating tumor cells (CTCs), and PD-L1 expression scores on these cells were monitored as biomarkers. Candida skin test assessed anergy status before cycle 1, and a delayed type hypersensitivity (DTH) skin test to SV-BR-1-GM was assessed at each cycle w/ a small SV-BR-1-GM dose before the full dose. Results Results of the randomized phase II study cohort are reported (n = 32). Retifanlimab was co-administered w/ SV-BR-1-GM at C1 or C2. Median age 61 (41-80) years; median number of prior regimens was 6 (2-13). 20(63%) pts were ER+/PR+/HER2-; 3(9%) HER2+, and 9 (28%) triple-negative (TNBC). The Bria-IMT regimen was well tolerated, w/ no drop-outs attributable to Bria-IMT. The majority of adverse events (93.8%) grade 1-2, w/ (40.6%) grades 3 and 4. Common AEs included injection site reactions (53%), nausea (43.8%), and fatigue (34%). The median progression free survival (PFS) was 3.5 (range: 1.8-24.5) and overall survival (OS) 9.5 (2.4-31.6) months. One patient remains on therapy, approaching 25 months of PFS. PFS and OS among pts who received immediate vs. delayed start of CPI (PFS 3.7 vs. 3.3 mo, HR: 0.59; 95% CI 0.3-1.2, p=0.16 | OS 13.3 vs. 7.4 months, HR: 0.78; 95% CI 0.34-1.8, p = 0.56). Pts who received the SV-BR-1-GM Ph3 formulation (n=21) had an increase in both PFS (4.1 vs 2.6 months, p = 0.005) and OS (16.6 vs. 9.1 months, HR: 0.6; 95% CI 0.2 - 1.4, p = 0.24); best objective response rate was 12% and the clinical benefit rate was 53%. In ER+/PR+/HER2-, overall OS was 11.7 (3.5-31.6) mo, 17.3 mo (3.5-27.9) in Ph3; HER2+ 7.2 (4.7-24.5) mo, all received Ph3; TNBC 9.9 (2.4-23.0) mo, 16.6 mo (2.4-23.0) in Ph3. In pts w/ available data, pts w/ post-dose CTC count &l
背景:转移性乳腺癌(MBC)的治疗仍然存在障碍,因为许多患者对标准护理治疗产生耐药性或不能耐受。Bria-IMT结合了两种模式,既能克服免疫衰竭,又能最大限度地减少当代晚期治疗中常见的毒性安全性:异体全细胞疫苗(SV-BR-1-GM)和检查点抑制(CPI)。SV-BR-1-GM细胞系来源于乳腺癌细胞,经过工程设计可分泌GM-CSF,并在给药前照射。这些细胞上调HLA I类和II类肿瘤相关抗原的表面呈递,增强T细胞对肿瘤的识别。与抗pd -1 CPI共给药,疫苗反应增强,抵消免疫抑制肿瘤微环境。该I/II期研究评估了Bria-IMT方案:低剂量环磷酰胺(第2天),然后是SV-BR-1-GM和CPI(派姆单抗或瑞替利单抗),然后是低剂量局部聚乙二醇干扰素α。周期q3w。在II期研究中,患者以1:1的比例随机分配,在第1周期(C1)立即开始CPI,或在第2周期(C2)延迟开始CPI。SV-BR-1-GM分为有IFNγ刺激(IFNγ)和未刺激(PH3)两种剂型。监测癌症相关巨噬细胞样细胞(caml)、循环肿瘤细胞(ctc)以及这些细胞的PD-L1表达评分作为生物标志物。假丝酵母皮肤试验评估第1周期前的能量状态,并在每个周期评估SV-BR-1-GM的延迟型超敏反应(DTH)皮肤试验,在全剂量之前使用小剂量的SV-BR-1-GM。结果报告了随机II期研究队列的结果(n = 32)。Retifanlimab与/ SV-BR-1-GM在C1或C2处联合给药。中位年龄61(41-80)岁;先前方案的中位数为6(2-13)。20例(63%)患者ER+/PR+/HER2-;HER2+ 3例(9%),三阴性(TNBC) 9例(28%)。Bria-IMT方案耐受性良好,无因Bria-IMT而退出。1-2级不良事件占93.8%,3级和4级不良事件占40.6%。常见不良反应包括注射部位反应(53%)、恶心(43.8%)和疲劳(34%)。中位无进展生存期(PFS)为3.5个月(范围:1.8-24.5),总生存期(OS)为9.5个月(2.4-31.6)。一名患者仍在接受治疗,PFS接近25个月。立即开始与延迟开始CPI的患者的PFS和OS (PFS 3.7 vs 3.3个月,HR: 0.59; 95% CI 0.3-1.2, p=0.16 |; OS 13.3 vs 7.4个月,HR: 0.78; 95% CI 0.34-1.8, p= 0.56)。接受SV-BR-1-GM Ph3制剂的患者(n=21)的PFS (4.1 vs 2.6个月,p = 0.005)和OS (16.6 vs 9.1个月,HR: 0.6; 95% CI 0.2 - 1.4, p = 0.24)均有所增加;最佳客观有效率为12%,临床获益率为53%。ER+/PR+/HER2-组总OS为11.7(3.5 ~ 31.6)个月,Ph3组总OS为17.3个月(3.5 ~ 27.9)个月;HER2+ 7.2 (4.7-24.5) mo,均接受Ph3;TNBC为9.9 (2.4 ~ 23.0)mo, Ph3为16.6 mo(2.4 ~ 23.0)。在可用数据的点数中,剂量后CTC计数的点数&;lt;5 .与w/ a CTC计数相比显著改善OS &;gt;5 (16.6 vs. 5.5个月,p = 0.0003)。DTH反应阳性的患者PFS(3.6个月对2.4个月,p = 0.01)和OS(11.9个月对4.7个月,p < 0.0001)显著改善。在大量预处理的MBC患者中,Bria-IMT方案在所有亚型乳腺癌中显示出良好的效果和良好的安全性。在C1和C2接受CPI的患者之间观察到有临床意义的OS差异,尽管没有统计学意义。在接受SV-BR-1-GM无IFNγ孵育的患者中,观察到较好的结果,指导了正在进行和后续临床试验中Ph3配方的选择。w/给药后CTC计数&;lt;DTH阳性反应显著改善预后。基于这些结果,一项比较Bria-IMT方案与医生选择的随机III期试验正在进行中(NCT06072612)。试验信息:NCT03328026。引用格式:C. Nangia, S. Chumsri, K. Rowland, L. Negret, J. Knecth, B. Bayer, T. Aghajanian, W. Williams, G. Del Priore, C. Calfa。ⅱ期Bria-IMT异体全细胞肿瘤疫苗的生存结果[摘要]。摘自:《2025年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集》;2025年12月9-12日;费城(PA): AACR;临床癌症杂志2026;32(4增刊):nr PS1-13-23。
{"title":"Abstract PS1-13-23: Survival Results of Phase II Bria-IMT Allogenic Whole Cell-Based Cancer Vaccine","authors":"C. Nangia, S. Chumsri, K. Rowland, L. Negret, J. Knecth, B. Bayer, T. Aghajanian, W. Williams, G. Del Priore, C. Calfa","doi":"10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps1-13-23","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps1-13-23","url":null,"abstract":"Background Management of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) continues to present obstacles, as many pts develop resistance to or cannot tolerate standard of care treatments. Bria-IMT combines two modalities to both overcome immune exhaustion and minimize the toxic safety profiles commonly observed in contemporary late stage therapies: an allogeneic whole-cell vaccine (SV-BR-1-GM) and checkpoint inhibition (CPI). The SV-BR-1-GM cell line originates from breast cancer cells and are engineered to secrete GM-CSF and irradiated before administration. These cells upregulate surface presentation of tumor associated antigens on both HLA class I and II, enhancing tumor recognition by T cells. Coadministration w/ an anti-PD-1 CPI, the vaccine response is reinforced, counteracting the immuno-suppressive tumor microenvironment. Methods This phase I/II study evaluated the Bria-IMT regimen: low-dose cyclophosphamide (Day –2) followed by SV-BR-1-GM and CPI (pembrolizumab or retifanlimab), then low-dose local peg- interferon α. Cycles q3w. In the phase II study, pts were randomized 1:1 to start CPI immediately at cycle 1 (C1) or delayed start at cycle 2 (C2). There were 2 formulations of SV-BR-1-GM w/ IFNγ stimulation (IFNγ) or unstimulated (PH3). Cancer-associated macrophage-like cells (CAMLs), circulating tumor cells (CTCs), and PD-L1 expression scores on these cells were monitored as biomarkers. Candida skin test assessed anergy status before cycle 1, and a delayed type hypersensitivity (DTH) skin test to SV-BR-1-GM was assessed at each cycle w/ a small SV-BR-1-GM dose before the full dose. Results Results of the randomized phase II study cohort are reported (n = 32). Retifanlimab was co-administered w/ SV-BR-1-GM at C1 or C2. Median age 61 (41-80) years; median number of prior regimens was 6 (2-13). 20(63%) pts were ER+/PR+/HER2-; 3(9%) HER2+, and 9 (28%) triple-negative (TNBC). The Bria-IMT regimen was well tolerated, w/ no drop-outs attributable to Bria-IMT. The majority of adverse events (93.8%) grade 1-2, w/ (40.6%) grades 3 and 4. Common AEs included injection site reactions (53%), nausea (43.8%), and fatigue (34%). The median progression free survival (PFS) was 3.5 (range: 1.8-24.5) and overall survival (OS) 9.5 (2.4-31.6) months. One patient remains on therapy, approaching 25 months of PFS. PFS and OS among pts who received immediate vs. delayed start of CPI (PFS 3.7 vs. 3.3 mo, HR: 0.59; 95% CI 0.3-1.2, p=0.16 | OS 13.3 vs. 7.4 months, HR: 0.78; 95% CI 0.34-1.8, p = 0.56). Pts who received the SV-BR-1-GM Ph3 formulation (n=21) had an increase in both PFS (4.1 vs 2.6 months, p = 0.005) and OS (16.6 vs. 9.1 months, HR: 0.6; 95% CI 0.2 - 1.4, p = 0.24); best objective response rate was 12% and the clinical benefit rate was 53%. In ER+/PR+/HER2-, overall OS was 11.7 (3.5-31.6) mo, 17.3 mo (3.5-27.9) in Ph3; HER2+ 7.2 (4.7-24.5) mo, all received Ph3; TNBC 9.9 (2.4-23.0) mo, 16.6 mo (2.4-23.0) in Ph3. In pts w/ available data, pts w/ post-dose CTC count &l","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146205202","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-17DOI: 10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps2-12-08
C. Lu, S. Wang, Y. Chen, Y. Wu, T. Huang, W. Chan, L. Chen, H. Wu, C. Wei
Background: While Enhertu® has delivered meaningful clinical benefits in HER2-positive and HER2-low cancers, many patients still experience suboptimal outcomes, particularly in HER2-low tumors that account for over 50% of the HER2-positive pan cancer population. Resistance to HER2-targeted therapies remains a critical challenge, including HER2 downregulation or loss, which diminishes antibody binding and payload delivery. OBI Pharma is the first to discover that TROP2 and HER2 form heterodimers (Data not published) in cancer cells. This TROP2 and HER2 crosstalk provides a strong rationale for dual targeting. In response, we developed OBI-201—a bispecific antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) engineered to simultaneously engage both TROP2 and HER2, aiming to enhance tumor specificity and overcome resistance associated with single-target therapies. Method: OBI-201 is a next-generation bispecific ADC that co-targets HER2 and TROP2, using site-specific GlycOBI® glycan-based conjugation technology to attach an exatecan payload at a DAR of 4 for precise delivery. To assess the efficiency of internalization, pHAb-labeled OBI-201 was applied to HER2/TROP2 co-expressing cells by quantifying fluorescence signals. To evaluate its antitumor activity, OBI-201 was tested in both cell line-derived xenograft (CDX) models and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. Results: The bispecific ADC format of OBI-201 was designed to enhance tumor targeting and promote efficient internalization, which was confirmed by strong internalization signals observed in cells co-expressing HER2 and TROP2. OBI-201 demonstrated superior antitumor activity compared to Enhertu®, Datroway®, and Trodelvy® in HER2-low colorectal, pancreatic, and NSCLC models, as well as in Enhertu-resistant NSCLC CDX models. Remarkably, in a HER2-low TNBC PDX model with established multi-drug resistance, including resistance to Trodelvy®, OBI-201 achieved complete tumor regression in 3 out of 6 mice, highlighting its potential to overcome treatment resistance and address unmet needs in difficult-to-treat tumors. Conclusion: OBI-201 is a next-generation bispecific ADC targeting HER2 and TROP2, designed to overcome the limitations of single-target therapies. Its dual-targeting approach, enabled by GlycOBI®, proprietary ADC enabling technologies for precise payload delivery, offers strong potential to overcome HER2-low expression and resistance, addressing significant unmet needs across a broad spectrum of solid tumors. Citation Format: C. Lu, S. Wang, Y. Chen, Y. Wu, T. Huang, W. Chan, L. Chen, H. Wu, C. Wei. Obi-201: a bispecific trop2 × her2 antibody-drug conjugate to expand therapeutic reach beyond her2-low limitations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl): nr PS2-12-08.
{"title":"Abstract PS2-12-08: Obi-201: a bispecific trop2 × her2 antibody-drug conjugate to expand therapeutic reach beyond her2-low limitations","authors":"C. Lu, S. Wang, Y. Chen, Y. Wu, T. Huang, W. Chan, L. Chen, H. Wu, C. Wei","doi":"10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps2-12-08","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps2-12-08","url":null,"abstract":"Background: While Enhertu® has delivered meaningful clinical benefits in HER2-positive and HER2-low cancers, many patients still experience suboptimal outcomes, particularly in HER2-low tumors that account for over 50% of the HER2-positive pan cancer population. Resistance to HER2-targeted therapies remains a critical challenge, including HER2 downregulation or loss, which diminishes antibody binding and payload delivery. OBI Pharma is the first to discover that TROP2 and HER2 form heterodimers (Data not published) in cancer cells. This TROP2 and HER2 crosstalk provides a strong rationale for dual targeting. In response, we developed OBI-201—a bispecific antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) engineered to simultaneously engage both TROP2 and HER2, aiming to enhance tumor specificity and overcome resistance associated with single-target therapies. Method: OBI-201 is a next-generation bispecific ADC that co-targets HER2 and TROP2, using site-specific GlycOBI® glycan-based conjugation technology to attach an exatecan payload at a DAR of 4 for precise delivery. To assess the efficiency of internalization, pHAb-labeled OBI-201 was applied to HER2/TROP2 co-expressing cells by quantifying fluorescence signals. To evaluate its antitumor activity, OBI-201 was tested in both cell line-derived xenograft (CDX) models and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. Results: The bispecific ADC format of OBI-201 was designed to enhance tumor targeting and promote efficient internalization, which was confirmed by strong internalization signals observed in cells co-expressing HER2 and TROP2. OBI-201 demonstrated superior antitumor activity compared to Enhertu®, Datroway®, and Trodelvy® in HER2-low colorectal, pancreatic, and NSCLC models, as well as in Enhertu-resistant NSCLC CDX models. Remarkably, in a HER2-low TNBC PDX model with established multi-drug resistance, including resistance to Trodelvy®, OBI-201 achieved complete tumor regression in 3 out of 6 mice, highlighting its potential to overcome treatment resistance and address unmet needs in difficult-to-treat tumors. Conclusion: OBI-201 is a next-generation bispecific ADC targeting HER2 and TROP2, designed to overcome the limitations of single-target therapies. Its dual-targeting approach, enabled by GlycOBI®, proprietary ADC enabling technologies for precise payload delivery, offers strong potential to overcome HER2-low expression and resistance, addressing significant unmet needs across a broad spectrum of solid tumors. Citation Format: C. Lu, S. Wang, Y. Chen, Y. Wu, T. Huang, W. Chan, L. Chen, H. Wu, C. Wei. Obi-201: a bispecific trop2 × her2 antibody-drug conjugate to expand therapeutic reach beyond her2-low limitations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl): nr PS2-12-08.","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146204841","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-17DOI: 10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps4-03-16
M. M. Caffarel, U. Alvarez, P. Azcoaga, A. Romo, S. Manzano, P. Petit, I. Garmendia, M. Garzón, Z. Telletxea, M. Otaño, A. Urruticoechea, I. Alvarez-Lopez
Inflammation is a natural immune response that can protect against cancer in early stages but, when becomes chronic, creates an immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment (TME) that promotes tumour progression. Recognized as a hallmark of cancer, chronic inflammation offers potential for new therapeutic strategies, particularly immunotherapy. However, some solid tumours, such as breast cancer, show partial resistance to these treatments. Cytokines are key regulators of inflammation, influencing cell communication and immune responses within the TME (1,2). Importantly, current clinical classification of BC often neglects the immune landscape, limiting the ability to predict responses to immunotherapy. Our hypothesis is that the cytokine profile of metastatic breast cancer possesses prognostic and predictive value and that cytokines can be potential biomarkers in breast cancer. Understanding how cytokine loops are coordinated within the breast TME could also lead to novel cytokine-based therapeutic strategies. Cytokine levels in serum and fresh tissue samples from metastatic BC patients (n=150) and in serum samples from metastatic cancer patients from other solid tumour types (n=186) were measured by Olink cytokine panel, which quantitatively assess 40 cytokines. Cytokine levels were correlated with clinical data, including overall and relapse free survival. The statistical analysis was done using different mathematical modelling methods. Our unpublished results show that the serum and tumour cytokine profiles do not correlate significantly, supporting the idea that some cytokines act locally in the TME. In addition, comparison with other metastatic tumour samples, led to the identification of some cytokines that are differentially expressed in BC. Integration of these data will shed light on the characterization of cytokine interactions in metastatic BC, helping to define its immune landscape. 1. Soler MF, Abaurrea A, Azcoaga P, Araujo AM, Caffarel MM. New perspectives in cancer immunotherapy: targeting IL-6 cytokine family. J Immunother Cancer. 2023;11(11):e007530; 2. Manzano S, Caffarel MM. Cytokine-centered strategies to boost cancer immunotherapy. Mol Oncol. 2025;19(3):579-583 Citation Format: M. M. CaffarelU. AlvarezP. AzcoagaA. RomoS. ManzanoP. PetitI. GarmendiaM. GarzónZ. TelletxeaM. OtañoA. UrruticoecheaI. Alvarez-Lopez. Characterization of the cytokine profile of metastatic Breast Cancer, from mediators of chronic inflammation to potential biomarkers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl): nr PS4-03-16.
炎症是一种自然的免疫反应,可以在早期阶段预防癌症,但当炎症变成慢性炎症时,就会产生一种免疫抑制肿瘤微环境(TME),促进肿瘤进展。慢性炎症被认为是癌症的标志,为新的治疗策略提供了潜力,特别是免疫疗法。然而,一些实体瘤,如乳腺癌,对这些治疗表现出部分耐药性。细胞因子是炎症的关键调节因子,影响TME内的细胞通讯和免疫反应(1,2)。重要的是,目前的BC临床分类往往忽略了免疫景观,限制了预测免疫治疗反应的能力。我们的假设是,转移性乳腺癌的细胞因子谱具有预后和预测价值,细胞因子可能是乳腺癌的潜在生物标志物。了解细胞因子环路如何在乳腺TME内协调也可能导致新的基于细胞因子的治疗策略。通过Olink细胞因子小组测量转移性BC患者(n=150)的血清和新鲜组织样本以及其他实体肿瘤类型转移性癌症患者(n=186)的血清样本中的细胞因子水平,该小组定量评估40种细胞因子。细胞因子水平与临床数据相关,包括总生存率和无复发生存率。采用不同的数学建模方法进行统计分析。我们未发表的研究结果表明,血清和肿瘤细胞因子特征没有显著相关性,支持一些细胞因子在TME局部起作用的观点。此外,通过与其他转移性肿瘤样本的比较,我们发现了一些在BC中差异表达的细胞因子。这些数据的整合将阐明转移性BC中细胞因子相互作用的特征,有助于定义其免疫景观。1. 王晓明,王晓明,王晓明,等。肿瘤免疫治疗的新进展:IL-6细胞因子家族。中华肿瘤杂志;2009;11(11):591 - 591;2. 王晓明,王晓明。肿瘤免疫治疗中细胞因子的研究进展。医学杂志。2025;引用格式:M. M. CaffarelU。AlvarezP。AzcoagaA。romo。ManzanoP。PetitI。GarmendiaM。GarzonZ。TelletxeaM。OtanoA。UrruticoecheaI。Alvarez-Lopez。转移性乳腺癌的细胞因子特征,从慢性炎症介质到潜在的生物标志物[摘要]。摘自:《2025年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集》;2025年12月9-12日;费城(PA): AACR;临床癌症杂志2026;32(4增刊):nr PS4-03-16。
{"title":"Abstract PS4-03-16: Characterization of the cytokine profile of metastatic Breast Cancer, from mediators of chronic inflammation to potential biomarkers","authors":"M. M. Caffarel, U. Alvarez, P. Azcoaga, A. Romo, S. Manzano, P. Petit, I. Garmendia, M. Garzón, Z. Telletxea, M. Otaño, A. Urruticoechea, I. Alvarez-Lopez","doi":"10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps4-03-16","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps4-03-16","url":null,"abstract":"Inflammation is a natural immune response that can protect against cancer in early stages but, when becomes chronic, creates an immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment (TME) that promotes tumour progression. Recognized as a hallmark of cancer, chronic inflammation offers potential for new therapeutic strategies, particularly immunotherapy. However, some solid tumours, such as breast cancer, show partial resistance to these treatments. Cytokines are key regulators of inflammation, influencing cell communication and immune responses within the TME (1,2). Importantly, current clinical classification of BC often neglects the immune landscape, limiting the ability to predict responses to immunotherapy. Our hypothesis is that the cytokine profile of metastatic breast cancer possesses prognostic and predictive value and that cytokines can be potential biomarkers in breast cancer. Understanding how cytokine loops are coordinated within the breast TME could also lead to novel cytokine-based therapeutic strategies. Cytokine levels in serum and fresh tissue samples from metastatic BC patients (n=150) and in serum samples from metastatic cancer patients from other solid tumour types (n=186) were measured by Olink cytokine panel, which quantitatively assess 40 cytokines. Cytokine levels were correlated with clinical data, including overall and relapse free survival. The statistical analysis was done using different mathematical modelling methods. Our unpublished results show that the serum and tumour cytokine profiles do not correlate significantly, supporting the idea that some cytokines act locally in the TME. In addition, comparison with other metastatic tumour samples, led to the identification of some cytokines that are differentially expressed in BC. Integration of these data will shed light on the characterization of cytokine interactions in metastatic BC, helping to define its immune landscape. 1. Soler MF, Abaurrea A, Azcoaga P, Araujo AM, Caffarel MM. New perspectives in cancer immunotherapy: targeting IL-6 cytokine family. J Immunother Cancer. 2023;11(11):e007530; 2. Manzano S, Caffarel MM. Cytokine-centered strategies to boost cancer immunotherapy. Mol Oncol. 2025;19(3):579-583 Citation Format: M. M. CaffarelU. AlvarezP. AzcoagaA. RomoS. ManzanoP. PetitI. GarmendiaM. GarzónZ. TelletxeaM. OtañoA. UrruticoecheaI. Alvarez-Lopez. Characterization of the cytokine profile of metastatic Breast Cancer, from mediators of chronic inflammation to potential biomarkers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl): nr PS4-03-16.","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":"278 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146204844","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-17DOI: 10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps4-10-20
A. Sweidan, J. Sherwood, M. Ahmed, S. Bai, H. Ali
Background: Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (NACT-IO) has been the standard of care for high-risk early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (eTNBC) for over five years. However, data on predictive biomarkers and clinical factors associated with treatment response remain limited. This study evaluates the association of several factors with pathological complete response (pCR) following NACT-IO. BRCA1/2 mutations, present in ∼15-20% of TNBC cases, are linked to higher tumor mutational burden (TMB), potentially enhancing immunotherapy response. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) is intrinsically expressed in immune cells and may influence anti-tumor immunity. Additionally, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) occur in ∼30% of eTNBC patients receiving NACT-IO; while higher-grade irAEs have been linked to improved pCR, data on low-grade irAEs remain limited. Thus, we assessed how BRCA1/2 status, ACE inhibitor use, and irAE severity may impact response to NACT-IO. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on eTNBC patients treated with NACT-IO at Henry Ford Hospital (Detroit, MI) between July 2021 and October 2024. Categorical variables were analyzed using Chi-square or Fisher exact tests; P < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Among 173 eligible patients, 14 (8%) had pathogenic BRCA1/2 mutations, 18 (10%) were on ACE inhibitors, 7 (4%) had grade 1 irAEs, and 51 (29%) had grade ≥2 irAEs. pCR rates were significantly higher among those with grade ≥2 irAEs versus those with grade 1 or no irAEs. No significant differences in pCR rates were seen by BRCA status or ACE inhibitor use, though BRCA-mutated patients showed a numerical trend toward higher pCR rates. Conclusion: pCR rates were significantly higher in patients with grade ≥2 irAEs. The low number of grade 1 irAEs may reflect underreporting. While BRCA1/2 mutation carriers had numerically higher pCR rates, this was not statistically significant, suggesting a potential improvement in response that warrants further study. Notably, ∼22% of patients lacked documented BRCA status, underscoring the need for universal genetic testing in TNBC. No significant association was found between ACE inhibitor use and surgical outcomes; however, larger studies are needed to clarify their potential impact on response to immunotherapy. Citation Format: A. Sweidan, J. Sherwood, M. Ahmed, S. Bai, H. Ali. Exploring Potential Predictive Factors for Immunotherapy Response in Early-Stage TNBC: Insights from a Retrospective Analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl): nr PS4-10-20.
背景:5年来,新辅助化疗免疫治疗(NACT-IO)一直是高危早期三阴性乳腺癌(eTNBC)的标准治疗方法。然而,与治疗反应相关的预测性生物标志物和临床因素的数据仍然有限。本研究评估了几种因素与NACT-IO术后病理完全反应(pCR)的关系。BRCA1/2突变存在于约15-20%的TNBC病例中,与较高的肿瘤突变负担(TMB)有关,可能会增强免疫治疗反应。血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)在免疫细胞内表达,并可能影响抗肿瘤免疫。此外,接受NACT-IO治疗的eTNBC患者中约30%发生免疫相关不良事件(irAEs);虽然较高级别的irae与改进的pCR有关,但低级别irae的数据仍然有限。因此,我们评估了BRCA1/2状态、ACE抑制剂的使用和irAE严重程度如何影响NACT-IO的反应。方法:回顾性分析2021年7月至2024年10月在亨利福特医院(底特律,密歇根州)接受NACT-IO治疗的eTNBC患者。分类变量分析采用卡方检验或Fisher精确检验;P, lt;0.05被认为是显著的。结果:在173例符合条件的患者中,14例(8%)患有致病性BRCA1/2突变,18例(10%)接受ACE抑制剂治疗,7例(4%)患有1级irAEs, 51例(29%)患有≥2级irAEs。≥2级irAEs患者的pCR率明显高于1级或无irAEs患者。BRCA状态或ACE抑制剂的使用在pCR率上没有显著差异,尽管BRCA突变的患者显示出更高pCR率的数值趋势。结论:≥2级irae患者的pCR率明显较高。一级irae数量少可能反映了漏报。虽然BRCA1/2突变携带者的pCR率在数值上更高,但这在统计学上并不显著,这表明反应的潜在改善值得进一步研究。值得注意的是,约22%的患者缺乏记录在案的BRCA状态,这强调了在TNBC中进行普遍基因检测的必要性。ACE抑制剂的使用与手术结果无显著相关性;然而,需要更大规模的研究来阐明它们对免疫治疗反应的潜在影响。引用格式:A. Sweidan, J. Sherwood, M. Ahmed, S. Bai, H. Ali。探讨早期TNBC免疫治疗反应的潜在预测因素:来自回顾性分析的见解[摘要]。摘自:《2025年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集》;2025年12月9-12日;费城(PA): AACR;临床癌症杂志2026;32(4增刊):nr PS4-10-20。
{"title":"Abstract PS4-10-20: Exploring Potential Predictive Factors for Immunotherapy Response in Early-Stage TNBC: Insights from a Retrospective Analysis","authors":"A. Sweidan, J. Sherwood, M. Ahmed, S. Bai, H. Ali","doi":"10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps4-10-20","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps4-10-20","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (NACT-IO) has been the standard of care for high-risk early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (eTNBC) for over five years. However, data on predictive biomarkers and clinical factors associated with treatment response remain limited. This study evaluates the association of several factors with pathological complete response (pCR) following NACT-IO. BRCA1/2 mutations, present in ∼15-20% of TNBC cases, are linked to higher tumor mutational burden (TMB), potentially enhancing immunotherapy response. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) is intrinsically expressed in immune cells and may influence anti-tumor immunity. Additionally, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) occur in ∼30% of eTNBC patients receiving NACT-IO; while higher-grade irAEs have been linked to improved pCR, data on low-grade irAEs remain limited. Thus, we assessed how BRCA1/2 status, ACE inhibitor use, and irAE severity may impact response to NACT-IO. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on eTNBC patients treated with NACT-IO at Henry Ford Hospital (Detroit, MI) between July 2021 and October 2024. Categorical variables were analyzed using Chi-square or Fisher exact tests; P &lt; 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Among 173 eligible patients, 14 (8%) had pathogenic BRCA1/2 mutations, 18 (10%) were on ACE inhibitors, 7 (4%) had grade 1 irAEs, and 51 (29%) had grade ≥2 irAEs. pCR rates were significantly higher among those with grade ≥2 irAEs versus those with grade 1 or no irAEs. No significant differences in pCR rates were seen by BRCA status or ACE inhibitor use, though BRCA-mutated patients showed a numerical trend toward higher pCR rates. Conclusion: pCR rates were significantly higher in patients with grade ≥2 irAEs. The low number of grade 1 irAEs may reflect underreporting. While BRCA1/2 mutation carriers had numerically higher pCR rates, this was not statistically significant, suggesting a potential improvement in response that warrants further study. Notably, ∼22% of patients lacked documented BRCA status, underscoring the need for universal genetic testing in TNBC. No significant association was found between ACE inhibitor use and surgical outcomes; however, larger studies are needed to clarify their potential impact on response to immunotherapy. Citation Format: A. Sweidan, J. Sherwood, M. Ahmed, S. Bai, H. Ali. Exploring Potential Predictive Factors for Immunotherapy Response in Early-Stage TNBC: Insights from a Retrospective Analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl): nr PS4-10-20.","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146204848","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-17DOI: 10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-pd9-07
G. Nader-Marta, S. Kumar Deshmukh, K. Fanucci, P. Tarantino, S. Schnitt, A. Lee, S. Oesterreich, S. Wu, J. Xiu, P. Advani, M. Lustberg, N. Lin, S. Tolaney, E. Mayer, O. Metzger, G. Sledge, R. Jeselsohn
Background: Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is the second most common breast cancer (BC) subtype, accounting for up to 15% of cases. Although several biologic differences between ILC and invasive carcinoma of no special type (NST) have been described, most data are derived from primary tumors. In contrast, the biology of metastatic ILC remains poorly defined. This study aimed to investigate the unique genomic, transcriptomic, and immune landscapes of metastatic ILC using a multi-omic approach. Methods: This real-world study included patients with confirmed NST or pure ILC who had a biopsy of a metastatic lesion or a breast lesion in the setting of known metastatic disease. Tumors underwent whole exome sequencing (NGS 592, NextSeq; WES, NovaSeq), whole transcriptome sequencing (WTS, NovaSeq) (Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ). Demographic and baseline molecular features were compared across histologic subtypes. Tumor mutational burden (TMB; high ≥10 mut/MB) was assessed by NGS. Immune cell populations were estimated by RNAseq deconvolution (quanTIseq). Pathway enrichment analysis was determined by GSEA. Overall survival (OS) was defined from the date of biopsy to death from any cause using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Statistical tests included chi-square and Mann-Whitney U with multiple testing correction (q<0.05). Results: Among 2,651 metastatic BC samples (ILC n = 608; NST n = 2,043), patients with ILC were older (median 67 vs 63 yrs) and more likely white (81.5% ILC vs 73.1% NST), all p<0.05. By IHC, ILC were more frequently HR+/HER2- (83.6% vs 55.9%), less commonly triple-negative (11.9% vs 29.8%) or HER2+ (4.6% vs 14.3%), all p<0.05. PAM50 subtypes differed between ILC and NST: luminal A (Lum A) (31.1% vs 13.7%) and luminal B (Lum B) (44.9% vs 43.8%) intrinsic subtypes were enriched in ILC, while NST was more frequently basal (1.2% vs 22.4%) and HER2-enriched (19.8% vs 22.2%), all p<0.05. Within luminal BC, Lum B was more common than Lum A in both histologies, but Lum A was proportionally more frequent in ILC (ILC: 40.3% Lum A vs 59.7% Lum B; NST: 23.4% Lum A vs 76.6% Lum B), p<0.0001. Comparative multi-omic analysis focused on the 922 HR+/HER2- tumors (ILC n = 275; NST n = 647). Compared to NST, ILC had higher frequency of CDH1 (87.3% vs 6.1%), PIK3CA (52.7% vs 38.5%), FOXA1 (9.0% vs 3.4%), ERBB2 (7.1% vs 2.0%), ARID1A, and NF1 (both q < 0.05) mutations and TMB high (17.7% vs 9.9%), but lower frequency of TP53 (15.7% vs 33.3%), ESR1 (10.9% vs 18.1%) and GATA3 (2.3% vs 14.9%) mutations along with FGFR1 amplifications (15.3% vs 6.7%), all q<0.05. ILC had higher expression of androgen receptor (91.2% vs 83.5%, q<0.05) and higher MAPK activation score (-0.81 vs -1.19, q<0.05), consistent with a luminal, hormone-driven phenotype. NST tumors demonstrated enrichment of pathways involved in the cell cycle and metabolic activity, including E2F targets, G2M checkpoint, MYC targets, mTORC1 sig
背景:浸润性小叶癌(ILC)是第二常见的乳腺癌(BC)亚型,占病例的15%。虽然已经描述了ILC和浸润性无特殊类型癌(NST)之间的一些生物学差异,但大多数数据来自原发肿瘤。相比之下,转移性ILC的生物学仍然不明确。本研究旨在利用多组学方法研究转移性ILC的独特基因组学、转录组学和免疫景观。方法:这项现实世界的研究包括确诊的NST或纯ILC患者,他们在已知的转移性疾病背景下进行了转移灶活检或乳房病变。肿瘤进行全外显子组测序(NGS 592, NextSeq; WES, NovaSeq),全转录组测序(WTS, NovaSeq) (Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ)。比较不同组织学亚型的人口学特征和基线分子特征。NGS评估肿瘤突变负荷(TMB;高≥10 mut/MB)。通过RNAseq反褶积(quanTIseq)估计免疫细胞群。通过GSEA进行途径富集分析。总生存期(OS)的定义从活检日期到任何原因导致的死亡,使用Kaplan-Meier估计。统计学检验采用卡方和Mann-Whitney U,多重检验校正(q<0.05)。结果:在2651例转移性BC样本(ILC n = 608; NST n = 2043)中,ILC患者年龄较大(中位年龄67岁vs中位年龄63岁),且更可能是白人(ILC为81.5% vs NST为73.1%),均为p&;lt;0.05。通过IHC, ILC中HR+/HER2-(83.6%比55.9%)较多,三阴性(11.9%比29.8%)或HER2+(4.6%比14.3%)较少,p < 0.05。PAM50亚型在ILC和NST之间存在差异:luminal A (Lum A)(31.1%比13.7%)和luminal B (Lum B)(44.9%比43.8%)内在亚型在ILC中富集,而NST更常见的是基础亚型(1.2%比22.4%)和her2富集(19.8%比22.2%),均为p amp;lt;0.05。在luminal BC中,Lum B在两种组织学中都比Lum A更常见,但Lum A在ILC中比例更高(ILC: 40.3% Lum A vs 59.7% Lum B; NST: 23.4% Lum A vs 76.6% Lum B), p amp;lt;0.0001。比较多组学分析集中于922例HR+/HER2-肿瘤(ILC n = 275; NST n = 647)。与NST相比,ILC的CDH1(87.3%比6.1%)、PIK3CA(52.7%比38.5%)、FOXA1(9.0%比3.4%)、ERBB2(7.1%比2.0%)、ARID1A和NF1(均为q&;lt;0.05)突变频率更高,TMB高(17.7%比9.9%),但TP53(15.7%比33.3%)、ESR1(10.9%比18.1%)和GATA3(2.3%比14.9%)突变频率较低,FGFR1扩增(15.3%比6.7%)均为q&;lt;0.05。ILC具有较高的雄激素受体表达(91.2% vs 83.5%, q<0.05)和较高的MAPK激活评分(-0.81 vs -1.19, q<0.05),符合腔内激素驱动的表型。NST肿瘤显示了参与细胞周期和代谢活性的途径的富集,包括E2F靶点、G2M检查点、MYC靶点、mTORC1信号传导、糖酵解和未折叠蛋白反应(NES: 1.5-2.7, FDR<0.25)。ILC肿瘤中B细胞、树突状细胞、中性粒细胞、NK细胞和M2巨噬细胞的浸润率较高,M1巨噬细胞浸润率较低,差异均为0.05。ILC免疫检查点基因差异表达(上调:CD274 (PD-L1)、PDCD1 (PD-1)、TNFSF14、CEACAM1、CD160,折叠变化(FC): 1.2-1.5;down: HAVCR2 (TIM-3): FC: 1.2),所有q&;lt;0.05。腔内ILC和NST的中位OS (mOS)相似(33.8个月vs 35.4个月);Hr 1.0, 95% ci 0.91-1.3)。Lum A ILC和NST之间没有mOS差异(47.4 vs 50.5 mo; HR 1.0, 0.84-1.43),而Lum B ILC的mOS比NST差(27.4 vs 35.3 mo; HR 1.3, 1.1-1.6)。结论:该研究代表了迄今为止最大的转移性ILC多组学特征队列,揭示了与NST相比不同的基因组,转录组学和免疫特征。这些发现突出了ILC的独特生物学特性,并可能为未来的亚型特异性治疗策略提供信息。引用格式:G. Nader-Marta, S. Kumar Deshmukh, K. Fanucci, P. Tarantino, S. Schnitt, A. Lee, S. Oesterreich, S. Wu, J. Xiu, P. Advani, M. Lustberg, N. Lin, S. Tolaney, E. Mayer, O. Metzger, G. Sledge Jr, R. Jeselsohn。转移性小叶性乳腺癌的基因组学、转录组学和免疫特征[摘要]。摘自:《2025年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集》;2025年12月9-12日;费城(PA): AACR;临床癌症杂志2026;32(4增刊):nr PD9-07。
{"title":"Abstract PD9-07: The Genomic, Transcriptomic, and Immune Hallmarks of Metastatic Lobular Breast Cancer","authors":"G. Nader-Marta, S. Kumar Deshmukh, K. Fanucci, P. Tarantino, S. Schnitt, A. Lee, S. Oesterreich, S. Wu, J. Xiu, P. Advani, M. Lustberg, N. Lin, S. Tolaney, E. Mayer, O. Metzger, G. Sledge, R. Jeselsohn","doi":"10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-pd9-07","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-pd9-07","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is the second most common breast cancer (BC) subtype, accounting for up to 15% of cases. Although several biologic differences between ILC and invasive carcinoma of no special type (NST) have been described, most data are derived from primary tumors. In contrast, the biology of metastatic ILC remains poorly defined. This study aimed to investigate the unique genomic, transcriptomic, and immune landscapes of metastatic ILC using a multi-omic approach. Methods: This real-world study included patients with confirmed NST or pure ILC who had a biopsy of a metastatic lesion or a breast lesion in the setting of known metastatic disease. Tumors underwent whole exome sequencing (NGS 592, NextSeq; WES, NovaSeq), whole transcriptome sequencing (WTS, NovaSeq) (Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ). Demographic and baseline molecular features were compared across histologic subtypes. Tumor mutational burden (TMB; high ≥10 mut/MB) was assessed by NGS. Immune cell populations were estimated by RNAseq deconvolution (quanTIseq). Pathway enrichment analysis was determined by GSEA. Overall survival (OS) was defined from the date of biopsy to death from any cause using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Statistical tests included chi-square and Mann-Whitney U with multiple testing correction (q&lt;0.05). Results: Among 2,651 metastatic BC samples (ILC n = 608; NST n = 2,043), patients with ILC were older (median 67 vs 63 yrs) and more likely white (81.5% ILC vs 73.1% NST), all p&lt;0.05. By IHC, ILC were more frequently HR+/HER2- (83.6% vs 55.9%), less commonly triple-negative (11.9% vs 29.8%) or HER2+ (4.6% vs 14.3%), all p&lt;0.05. PAM50 subtypes differed between ILC and NST: luminal A (Lum A) (31.1% vs 13.7%) and luminal B (Lum B) (44.9% vs 43.8%) intrinsic subtypes were enriched in ILC, while NST was more frequently basal (1.2% vs 22.4%) and HER2-enriched (19.8% vs 22.2%), all p&lt;0.05. Within luminal BC, Lum B was more common than Lum A in both histologies, but Lum A was proportionally more frequent in ILC (ILC: 40.3% Lum A vs 59.7% Lum B; NST: 23.4% Lum A vs 76.6% Lum B), p&lt;0.0001. Comparative multi-omic analysis focused on the 922 HR+/HER2- tumors (ILC n = 275; NST n = 647). Compared to NST, ILC had higher frequency of CDH1 (87.3% vs 6.1%), PIK3CA (52.7% vs 38.5%), FOXA1 (9.0% vs 3.4%), ERBB2 (7.1% vs 2.0%), ARID1A, and NF1 (both q &lt; 0.05) mutations and TMB high (17.7% vs 9.9%), but lower frequency of TP53 (15.7% vs 33.3%), ESR1 (10.9% vs 18.1%) and GATA3 (2.3% vs 14.9%) mutations along with FGFR1 amplifications (15.3% vs 6.7%), all q&lt;0.05. ILC had higher expression of androgen receptor (91.2% vs 83.5%, q&lt;0.05) and higher MAPK activation score (-0.81 vs -1.19, q&lt;0.05), consistent with a luminal, hormone-driven phenotype. NST tumors demonstrated enrichment of pathways involved in the cell cycle and metabolic activity, including E2F targets, G2M checkpoint, MYC targets, mTORC1 sig","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146204849","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-17DOI: 10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps5-02-12
Z. Sarfraz, V. Podder, K. Vazquez, F. Akkoc Mustafayev, M. Jaramillo, K. A. Qidwai, M. Ganiyani, V. Andion Camargo, R. Mahtani, M. Ahluwalia
Background: Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), a novel antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), has shown promising intracranial efficacy in breast cancer (BC) patients with brain metastases (BM). This meta-analysis evaluates the intracranial activity and systemic efficacy of T-DXd in patients with metastatic BC and BM. Methods: A systematic search was conducted from inception until May 6, 2025, across PubMed, Cochrane Library, and oncology conference abstracts (ASCO, ESMO, SABCS, and EANO). Eligible studies included clinical trials and cohort studies reporting outcomes for BC patients with BM receiving T-DXd. Random-effects meta-analysis models with Freeman-Tukey transformations were used for pooling proportions (intracranial clinical benefit rate [IC-CBR], intracranial objective response rate [IC-ORR], and 12-month systemic overall survival [OS]). Systemic progression-free survival (PFS) was pooled using a random-effects inverse-variance model. For PFS, means and standard deviations (SDs) were extracted when available or estimated from medians and IQRs using the Wan et al. (2014) method: mean = (Q1 + median + Q3)/3 and SD = (Q3 − Q1)/1.35, adjusted for sample size. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic, with values ≤25% considered low, 26-75% moderate, and >75% high. Registration: osf.io/swghm. Results: Of the 489 screened records, 14 studies were included; 1 was a randomized controlled trial, 6 were prospective single-arm trials, and 7 were retrospective cohort studies, including real-world data from early access programs. Median patient age was 56.3 years; 97.3% had HER2-positive BC, and 2.7% HER2-low. Prior cranial radiotherapy was administered in 61%, with concurrent radiotherapy at T-DXd initiation in 1.4%. Median follow-up duration was 12.9 months (IQR: 11-15). T-DXd was administered uniformly at 5.4 mg/kg IV every three weeks, with protocol-specified dose reductions allowed. Pooled IC-CBR was 81% (95% CI: 69-91%, p<0.001), indicating strong intracranial clinical efficacy, with low heterogeneity (I2=18.6%). IC-ORR was 62% (95% CI: 51-74%, p<0.001), suggestive of substantial intracranial tumor responses. Moderate heterogeneity was noted (I2=71.8%). The pooled mean systemic PFS was 12.6 months (95% CI: 7.1-18.1, I2=99.8%, p<0.001). Pooled 12-month OS was 81% (95% CI: 66-93%, p<0.001), highlighting favorable survival outcomes despite high heterogeneity (I2=86.5%). Conclusion: T-DXd demonstrates robust intracranial activity and 12-month survival in breast cancer patients with brain metastases. The pooled IC-CBR of 81% notably exceeds historical benchmarks reported with T-DM1 or chemotherapy, which typically range from 30-50% in this population. Prospective studies are needed to refine patient selection and optimize therapeutic sequencing. Citation Format: Z. Sarfraz, V. Podder, K. Vazquez, F. Akkoc Mustafayev, M. Jaramillo, K. A. Qidwai, M. Ganiyani, V. Andion Camargo, R. Mahtani, M. Ahluwalia. Intracranial A
背景:曲妥珠单抗德鲁西替康(T-DXd)是一种新型抗体-药物偶联物(ADC),在乳腺癌(BC)脑转移(BM)患者中显示出有希望的颅内疗效。这项荟萃分析评估了T-DXd在转移性BC和BM患者中的颅内活动和全身疗效。方法:系统检索从研究开始到2025年5月6日,检索对象包括PubMed、Cochrane图书馆和肿瘤学会议摘要(ASCO、ESMO、SABCS和EANO)。符合条件的研究包括报告接受T-DXd治疗的BC患者预后的临床试验和队列研究。采用Freeman-Tukey转换的随机效应荟萃分析模型进行合并比例(颅内临床获益率[IC-CBR]、颅内客观缓解率[IC-ORR]和12个月全身总生存率[OS])。系统无进展生存期(PFS)采用随机效应反方差模型进行汇总。对于PFS,使用Wan等人(2014)的方法提取可用的平均值和标准差(SD),或从中位数和iqr中估计:平均值= (Q1 +中位数+ Q3)/3, SD = (Q3−Q1)/1.35,根据样本量进行调整。使用I2统计量评估异质性,值≤25%为低,26-75%为中等,>;高75%。注册:osf.io / swghm。结果:在筛选的489份记录中,纳入了14项研究;1项是随机对照试验,6项是前瞻性单臂试验,7项是回顾性队列研究,包括来自早期准入项目的真实数据。患者年龄中位数为56.3岁;97.3%为her2阳性,2.7%为her2低。61%的患者先前进行了头部放疗,1.4%的患者在T-DXd开始时同时进行了放疗。中位随访时间为12.9个月(IQR: 11-15)。T-DXd每三周以5.4 mg/kg IV的剂量均匀给药,允许方案规定的剂量减少。综合IC-CBR为81% (95% CI: 69-91%, p<0.001),颅内临床疗效强,异质性低(I2=18.6%)。IC-ORR为62% (95% CI: 51-74%, p<0.001),提示颅内肿瘤有实质性反应。中度异质性(I2=71.8%)。合并平均系统PFS为12.6个月(95% CI: 7.1-18.1, I2=99.8%, p<0.001)。12个月的总OS为81% (95% CI: 66-93%, p<0.001),尽管异质性很高(I2=86.5%),但仍显示出良好的生存结果。结论:T-DXd在乳腺癌脑转移患者中表现出强劲的颅内活性和12个月的生存率。81%的总IC-CBR明显超过了T-DM1或化疗的历史基准,在该人群中通常在30-50%之间。需要前瞻性研究来完善患者选择和优化治疗顺序。引文格式:Z. Sarfraz, V. Podder, K. Vazquez, F. Akkoc Mustafayev, M. Jaramillo, K. A. Qidwai, M. Ganiyani, V. Andion Camargo, R. Mahtani, M. Ahluwalia。曲妥珠单抗德鲁司替康治疗乳腺癌脑转移患者的颅内活动及全身疗效[摘要]。摘自:《2025年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集》;2025年12月9-12日;费城(PA): AACR;临床癌症杂志2026;32(4增刊):nr PS5-02-12。
{"title":"Abstract PS5-02-12: Intracranial Activity and Systemic Efficacy of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in Breast Cancer Patients with Brain Metastases","authors":"Z. Sarfraz, V. Podder, K. Vazquez, F. Akkoc Mustafayev, M. Jaramillo, K. A. Qidwai, M. Ganiyani, V. Andion Camargo, R. Mahtani, M. Ahluwalia","doi":"10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps5-02-12","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps5-02-12","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), a novel antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), has shown promising intracranial efficacy in breast cancer (BC) patients with brain metastases (BM). This meta-analysis evaluates the intracranial activity and systemic efficacy of T-DXd in patients with metastatic BC and BM. Methods: A systematic search was conducted from inception until May 6, 2025, across PubMed, Cochrane Library, and oncology conference abstracts (ASCO, ESMO, SABCS, and EANO). Eligible studies included clinical trials and cohort studies reporting outcomes for BC patients with BM receiving T-DXd. Random-effects meta-analysis models with Freeman-Tukey transformations were used for pooling proportions (intracranial clinical benefit rate [IC-CBR], intracranial objective response rate [IC-ORR], and 12-month systemic overall survival [OS]). Systemic progression-free survival (PFS) was pooled using a random-effects inverse-variance model. For PFS, means and standard deviations (SDs) were extracted when available or estimated from medians and IQRs using the Wan et al. (2014) method: mean = (Q1 + median + Q3)/3 and SD = (Q3 − Q1)/1.35, adjusted for sample size. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic, with values ≤25% considered low, 26-75% moderate, and &gt;75% high. Registration: osf.io/swghm. Results: Of the 489 screened records, 14 studies were included; 1 was a randomized controlled trial, 6 were prospective single-arm trials, and 7 were retrospective cohort studies, including real-world data from early access programs. Median patient age was 56.3 years; 97.3% had HER2-positive BC, and 2.7% HER2-low. Prior cranial radiotherapy was administered in 61%, with concurrent radiotherapy at T-DXd initiation in 1.4%. Median follow-up duration was 12.9 months (IQR: 11-15). T-DXd was administered uniformly at 5.4 mg/kg IV every three weeks, with protocol-specified dose reductions allowed. Pooled IC-CBR was 81% (95% CI: 69-91%, p&lt;0.001), indicating strong intracranial clinical efficacy, with low heterogeneity (I2=18.6%). IC-ORR was 62% (95% CI: 51-74%, p&lt;0.001), suggestive of substantial intracranial tumor responses. Moderate heterogeneity was noted (I2=71.8%). The pooled mean systemic PFS was 12.6 months (95% CI: 7.1-18.1, I2=99.8%, p&lt;0.001). Pooled 12-month OS was 81% (95% CI: 66-93%, p&lt;0.001), highlighting favorable survival outcomes despite high heterogeneity (I2=86.5%). Conclusion: T-DXd demonstrates robust intracranial activity and 12-month survival in breast cancer patients with brain metastases. The pooled IC-CBR of 81% notably exceeds historical benchmarks reported with T-DM1 or chemotherapy, which typically range from 30-50% in this population. Prospective studies are needed to refine patient selection and optimize therapeutic sequencing. Citation Format: Z. Sarfraz, V. Podder, K. Vazquez, F. Akkoc Mustafayev, M. Jaramillo, K. A. Qidwai, M. Ganiyani, V. Andion Camargo, R. Mahtani, M. Ahluwalia. Intracranial A","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146204853","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-17DOI: 10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps5-08-07
A. Kahn, J. Du, N. Casasanta, S. Schellhorn, M. Digiovanna, T. Sanft, M. Rozenblit, A. Silber, L. Pusztai, Z. Rahman, D. O'Neil, R. Legare, W. Kidwai, J. Kanowitz, A. Bulgaru, N. Fischbach, S. Hall, K. Fenn, K. Blenman, O. Blaha, E. Winer, I. Krop, D. Rimm, M. Lustberg
Background: Trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-DXd) showed impressive efficacy in patients whose breast cancers are either human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) immunohistochemistry (IHC) positive or HER2-low/ultralow. In a phase 2 trial, patients with HER2-IHC 0 who received T-DXd had an objective response rate of approximately 30%, revealing activity regardless of HER2-IHC status. In this study, we will treat patients with advanced HER2 IHC 0 breast cancers with T-DXd and assess biomarkers of response and resistance to therapy. We will investigate patients’ tumor biopsies for more precise quantitative HER2 tests, including the High-Sensitivity (HS)-HER2 Troplex testing, that could help determine if T-DXd is active in patients with HER2-IHC 0 tumors regardless of HER2 quantitative expression or if there is a potentially optimal cutoff value of HER2 expression with respect to clinical outcomes for response, improving patient selection and prevention of unnecessary toxicity. Methods: This is a non-randomized, single-arm, open-label, phase 2 study to assess the efficacy and safety of T-DXd in patients whose breast cancer is HER2-IHC 0 (including 0-null and 0-ultralow) in all prior biopsies, with unresectable and/or metastatic disease regardless of hormone receptor (HR) status (NCT06750484). Key eligibility criteria include ECOG-PS 0-2; up to 2 prior lines of systemic cytotoxic therapy for treatment in the metastatic setting; no upper limit of prior endocrine, immunologic or targeted therapy lines. Fifty subjects will be included to achieve 82% power to detect a difference in ORR of 0.15 from historical control (ORR in experimental arm of 0.3 vs. ORR in historical control of 0.15) using a two-sided exact test with a target significance level of 0.1. The study treatment with T-DXd administered intravenously every 3 weeks at a dose of 5.4 mg per kilogram of body weight will be continued in the absence of withdrawal of subject consent, progressive disease (PD), death, or unacceptable toxicity. Patients will be followed and evaluated by RECIST v1.1 criteria. Objective response to T-DXd will be evaluated in the entire study population and separately in the High-Sensitivity (HS)-HER2 Troplex detectable and non-detectable cohorts (defined by the limit of detection [LOD] of the analytic HS-HER2 Troplex assay). In addition, HER2 tissue concentrations (measured by the HS-HER2 Troplex assay in attomole/mm2) will be plotted and analyzed as a function of response to determine levels of tumor expression and potential cut-points associated with benefit from T-DXd. Since the Troplex assay simultaneously provides TROP2 levels in attomole/mm2, the influence of TROP2 levels on response to T-DXd will also be exploratorily investigated. Additional objectives are to assess efficacy in terms of progression-free survival and overall survival, safety, and explore potential biomarkers of response and resistance to therapy with T-DXd. The trial is currently open and enrollin
背景:曲妥珠单抗-德鲁西替康(T-DXd)对人表皮生长因子受体2 (HER2)免疫组化(IHC)阳性或HER2低/超低的乳腺癌患者显示出令人印象深刻的疗效。在一项2期试验中,接受T-DXd治疗的HER2-IHC 0患者的客观缓解率约为30%,显示出与HER2-IHC状态无关的活性。在这项研究中,我们将用T-DXd治疗晚期HER2 IHC 0乳腺癌患者,并评估对治疗的反应和耐药的生物标志物。我们将对患者的肿瘤活检进行更精确的HER2定量检测,包括高灵敏度(HS)-HER2 Troplex检测,这可以帮助确定T-DXd在HER2- ihc 0肿瘤患者中是否有活性,而不考虑HER2的定量表达,或者HER2表达是否存在潜在的最佳临界值,这与临床结果的反应、改善患者选择和预防不必要的毒性有关。方法:这是一项非随机、单臂、开放标签的2期研究,旨在评估T-DXd在所有既往活检中HER2-IHC为0(包括0-null和0-超低)、不可切除和/或转移性疾病的乳腺癌患者中的疗效和安全性,无论激素受体(HR)状态如何(NCT06750484)。主要资格标准包括ECOG-PS 0-2;对于转移性肿瘤患者,既往接受最多2次全身性细胞毒治疗;先前的内分泌、免疫或靶向治疗线没有上限。将纳入50名受试者,使用目标显著性水平为0.1的双侧精确检验,以达到82%的能力来检测与历史对照组的ORR差异为0.15(实验组的ORR为0.3,历史对照组的ORR为0.15)。在没有受试者同意退出、疾病进展、死亡或不可接受的毒性的情况下,T-DXd每3周静脉注射5.4 mg / kg体重的研究治疗将继续进行。患者将按照RECIST v1.1标准进行随访和评估。对T-DXd的客观反应将在整个研究人群中进行评估,并分别在高灵敏度(HS)-HER2 Troplex可检测和不可检测队列中进行评估(由HS-HER2 Troplex分析的检测限[LOD]定义)。此外,将绘制和分析HER2组织浓度(通过HS-HER2 Troplex测定,单位为attomole/mm2)作为应答的函数,以确定肿瘤表达水平和与T-DXd获益相关的潜在切割点。由于Troplex试验同时提供了以原子摩尔/mm2为单位的TROP2水平,因此TROP2水平对T-DXd应答的影响也将进行探索性研究。其他目标是评估无进展生存期和总生存期、安全性方面的有效性,并探索对T-DXd治疗的反应和耐药的潜在生物标志物。该试验目前正在开放并招募患者。引文格式:A. Kahn, J. Du, N. Casasanta, S. Schellhorn, M. Digiovanna, T. Sanft, M. Rozenblit, A. Silber, L. Pusztai, Z. Rahman, D. O'Neil, R. Legare, W. Kidwai, J. Kanowitz, A. Bulgaru, N. Fischbach, S. Hall, K. Fenn, K. Blenman, O. Blaha, E. Winer, I. Krop, D. Rimm, M. Lustberg。曲妥珠单抗Deruxtecan在先前治疗的HER2免疫组织化学(IHC) 0晚期乳腺癌- HER2范式试验中的开放标签单臂2期试验[摘要]。摘自:《2025年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集》;2025年12月9-12日;费城(PA): AACR;临床癌症杂志2026;32(4增刊):nr PS5-08-07。
{"title":"Abstract PS5-08-07: Open-label Single-arm Phase 2 Trial of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in Previously Treated HER2-Immunohistochemistry (IHC) 0 Advanced Breast Cancer - HER2 PARADIGM trial","authors":"A. Kahn, J. Du, N. Casasanta, S. Schellhorn, M. Digiovanna, T. Sanft, M. Rozenblit, A. Silber, L. Pusztai, Z. Rahman, D. O'Neil, R. Legare, W. Kidwai, J. Kanowitz, A. Bulgaru, N. Fischbach, S. Hall, K. Fenn, K. Blenman, O. Blaha, E. Winer, I. Krop, D. Rimm, M. Lustberg","doi":"10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps5-08-07","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps5-08-07","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-DXd) showed impressive efficacy in patients whose breast cancers are either human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) immunohistochemistry (IHC) positive or HER2-low/ultralow. In a phase 2 trial, patients with HER2-IHC 0 who received T-DXd had an objective response rate of approximately 30%, revealing activity regardless of HER2-IHC status. In this study, we will treat patients with advanced HER2 IHC 0 breast cancers with T-DXd and assess biomarkers of response and resistance to therapy. We will investigate patients’ tumor biopsies for more precise quantitative HER2 tests, including the High-Sensitivity (HS)-HER2 Troplex testing, that could help determine if T-DXd is active in patients with HER2-IHC 0 tumors regardless of HER2 quantitative expression or if there is a potentially optimal cutoff value of HER2 expression with respect to clinical outcomes for response, improving patient selection and prevention of unnecessary toxicity. Methods: This is a non-randomized, single-arm, open-label, phase 2 study to assess the efficacy and safety of T-DXd in patients whose breast cancer is HER2-IHC 0 (including 0-null and 0-ultralow) in all prior biopsies, with unresectable and/or metastatic disease regardless of hormone receptor (HR) status (NCT06750484). Key eligibility criteria include ECOG-PS 0-2; up to 2 prior lines of systemic cytotoxic therapy for treatment in the metastatic setting; no upper limit of prior endocrine, immunologic or targeted therapy lines. Fifty subjects will be included to achieve 82% power to detect a difference in ORR of 0.15 from historical control (ORR in experimental arm of 0.3 vs. ORR in historical control of 0.15) using a two-sided exact test with a target significance level of 0.1. The study treatment with T-DXd administered intravenously every 3 weeks at a dose of 5.4 mg per kilogram of body weight will be continued in the absence of withdrawal of subject consent, progressive disease (PD), death, or unacceptable toxicity. Patients will be followed and evaluated by RECIST v1.1 criteria. Objective response to T-DXd will be evaluated in the entire study population and separately in the High-Sensitivity (HS)-HER2 Troplex detectable and non-detectable cohorts (defined by the limit of detection [LOD] of the analytic HS-HER2 Troplex assay). In addition, HER2 tissue concentrations (measured by the HS-HER2 Troplex assay in attomole/mm2) will be plotted and analyzed as a function of response to determine levels of tumor expression and potential cut-points associated with benefit from T-DXd. Since the Troplex assay simultaneously provides TROP2 levels in attomole/mm2, the influence of TROP2 levels on response to T-DXd will also be exploratorily investigated. Additional objectives are to assess efficacy in terms of progression-free survival and overall survival, safety, and explore potential biomarkers of response and resistance to therapy with T-DXd. The trial is currently open and enrollin","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146205193","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}