首页 > 最新文献

Clinical Cancer Research最新文献

英文 中文
Abstract PS3-03-25: Alteration in estrogen receptor status in metachronous contralateral breast cancer among unilateral early breast cancer patients with BRCA 1/2 mutations 摘要PS3-03-25: BRCA 1/2突变单侧早期乳腺癌患者异时性对侧乳腺癌中雌激素受体状态的改变
IF 11.5 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-20 DOI: 10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps3-03-25
K. Kim, E. Kang, S. Baek, H. Lee, S. Ahn, W. Park, D. Shin, H. Lee, S. Nam, S. Kim, J. Yu, B. Chae, L. Se Kyung, J. Lee, J. Ryu
Background BRCA1/2 mutations are known to significantly increase the risk of contralateral breast cancer (CBC). However, their influence on changes in estrogen receptor (ER) status between primary breast cancer and metachronous CBC remains unclear. This study investigates ER status alterations in CBC patients with BRCA1/2 mutations to provide insights into their clinical implications. Methods This multicenter retrospective study was conducted between 2004 and 2020. Patients with unilateral early breast cancer who underwent BRCA1/2 testing and developed metachronous CBC were grouped by BRCA1/2 mutation status. ER status of primary and CBC tumors was compared using Fisher’s exact test and logistic regression to assess the relationship between BRCA1/2 mutations and ER alterations. Results Among 423 CBC patients, those with BRCA1 mutation had a higher likelihood of ER negative primary tumors transitioning to ER negative CBC (70.7%) compared to BRCA1/2 negative patients (odds ratio [OR] 3.8, p < 0.001). Similarly, ER-negative primary tumors were more likely to remain ER negative in CBC among BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers (64.8%, OR 2.9, p = 0.002). These findings demonstrate a strong association between BRCA1 mutations and the development of ER negative CBC in ER negative primary breast cancer. Of the patients with primary ER-negative breast cancer, those who received adjuvant chemotherapy for both primary and contralateral breast cancers showed a significantly higher rate of CBC with ER-negative alteration (OR 4.23, p=0.001). Conclusion BRCA1 mutation carriers face a significantly higher risk of developing ER negative metachronous CBC, in ER negative primary tumor. These findings highlight the importance of genetic counseling and risk-reducing strategies, including prophylactic mastectomy, for BRCA1 mutation carriers, which typically requires more aggressive treatments. Citation Format: K. Kim, E. Kang, S. Baek, H. Lee, S. Ahn, W. Park, D. Shin, H. Lee, S. Nam, S. Kim, J. Yu, B. Chae, L. Se Kyung, J. Lee, J. Ryu. Alteration in estrogen receptor status in metachronous contralateral breast cancer among unilateral early breast cancer patients with BRCA 1/2 mutations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl): nr PS3-03-25.
已知BRCA1/2突变可显著增加对侧乳腺癌(CBC)的风险。然而,它们对原发性乳腺癌和异时性CBC之间雌激素受体(ER)状态变化的影响尚不清楚。本研究调查了BRCA1/2突变的CBC患者ER状态的改变,以提供其临床意义的见解。方法2004 ~ 2020年进行多中心回顾性研究。接受BRCA1/2检测并发生异时性CBC的单侧早期乳腺癌患者按BRCA1/2突变状态分组。采用Fisher精确检验和logistic回归来比较原发性和CBC肿瘤的ER状态,以评估BRCA1/2突变与ER改变之间的关系。结果在423例CBC患者中,与BRCA1/2阴性患者相比,BRCA1突变患者ER阴性原发肿瘤转变为ER阴性CBC的可能性更高(70.7%)(优势比[OR] 3.8, p < 0.001)。同样,在BRCA1或BRCA2突变携带者中,ER阴性的原发性肿瘤更有可能在CBC中保持ER阴性(64.8%,or 2.9, p = 0.002)。这些发现表明,在ER阴性原发性乳腺癌中,BRCA1突变与ER阴性CBC的发展有很强的相关性。在原发性er阴性乳腺癌患者中,接受辅助化疗的原发性和对侧乳腺癌患者的CBC er阴性改变率明显更高(OR 4.23, p=0.001)。结论在ER阴性原发肿瘤中,BRCA1突变携带者发生ER阴性异时性CBC的风险较高。这些发现强调了遗传咨询和降低风险策略的重要性,包括预防性乳房切除术,对于BRCA1突变携带者来说,这通常需要更积极的治疗。引文格式:Kim K., E. Kang, S. Baek, H. Lee, H. Ahn, W. Park, D. Shin, H. Lee, S. Nam, S. Kim, J. Yu, B. Chae, L. Se Kyung, J. Lee, J. rj。BRCA 1/2突变单侧早期乳腺癌患者异时性对侧乳腺癌中雌激素受体状态的改变[摘要]。摘自:《2025年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集》;2025年12月9-12日;费城(PA): AACR;临床癌症杂志2026;32(4增刊):nr PS3-03-25。
{"title":"Abstract PS3-03-25: Alteration in estrogen receptor status in metachronous contralateral breast cancer among unilateral early breast cancer patients with BRCA 1/2 mutations","authors":"K. Kim, E. Kang, S. Baek, H. Lee, S. Ahn, W. Park, D. Shin, H. Lee, S. Nam, S. Kim, J. Yu, B. Chae, L. Se Kyung, J. Lee, J. Ryu","doi":"10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps3-03-25","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps3-03-25","url":null,"abstract":"Background BRCA1/2 mutations are known to significantly increase the risk of contralateral breast cancer (CBC). However, their influence on changes in estrogen receptor (ER) status between primary breast cancer and metachronous CBC remains unclear. This study investigates ER status alterations in CBC patients with BRCA1/2 mutations to provide insights into their clinical implications. Methods This multicenter retrospective study was conducted between 2004 and 2020. Patients with unilateral early breast cancer who underwent BRCA1/2 testing and developed metachronous CBC were grouped by BRCA1/2 mutation status. ER status of primary and CBC tumors was compared using Fisher’s exact test and logistic regression to assess the relationship between BRCA1/2 mutations and ER alterations. Results Among 423 CBC patients, those with BRCA1 mutation had a higher likelihood of ER negative primary tumors transitioning to ER negative CBC (70.7%) compared to BRCA1/2 negative patients (odds ratio [OR] 3.8, p &amp;lt; 0.001). Similarly, ER-negative primary tumors were more likely to remain ER negative in CBC among BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers (64.8%, OR 2.9, p = 0.002). These findings demonstrate a strong association between BRCA1 mutations and the development of ER negative CBC in ER negative primary breast cancer. Of the patients with primary ER-negative breast cancer, those who received adjuvant chemotherapy for both primary and contralateral breast cancers showed a significantly higher rate of CBC with ER-negative alteration (OR 4.23, p=0.001). Conclusion BRCA1 mutation carriers face a significantly higher risk of developing ER negative metachronous CBC, in ER negative primary tumor. These findings highlight the importance of genetic counseling and risk-reducing strategies, including prophylactic mastectomy, for BRCA1 mutation carriers, which typically requires more aggressive treatments. Citation Format: K. Kim, E. Kang, S. Baek, H. Lee, S. Ahn, W. Park, D. Shin, H. Lee, S. Nam, S. Kim, J. Yu, B. Chae, L. Se Kyung, J. Lee, J. Ryu. Alteration in estrogen receptor status in metachronous contralateral breast cancer among unilateral early breast cancer patients with BRCA 1/2 mutations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl): nr PS3-03-25.","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146230764","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract PS3-04-03: Inter-chromosomal focal amplifications frequently co-carry multiple oncogenes in aggressive breast cancer, accumulating oncogenic elements during breast cancer progression 摘要PS3-04-03:在侵袭性乳腺癌中,染色体间局灶扩增经常共同携带多个癌基因,在乳腺癌进展过程中积累致癌因子
IF 11.5 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-20 DOI: 10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps3-04-03
J. Kim, C. HyeongJin, H. Lee, E. Cho, J. Lee, S. Kim, Y. Park, H. Kim
BACKGROUND: Focal copy number amplification is known to play a crucial role in oncogenesis of breast cancer (BC). Especially, the amplification of interchromosomal oncogenic translocation such as t(8;11), t(8,17) and t(11;17) is known to be the main feature of BCs. However, there is a lack of clinical evidence that such interchromosomal focal amplifications promotes tumor progression. Here, we investigated the prevalence of interchromosomal focal amplifications in primary and metastatic BCs collected at a single hospital. METHODS: 65 primary tumors were collected from BC surgical specimens obtained after curative surgery following NAC (neoadjuvant chemotherapy), and 10 metastatic BC tumors from post-adjuvant biopsies. Whole genome sequencing (mean coverage 62X, range 51∼74X for tumors; mean coverage 33X, range 30∼40X for patient-matching normal bloods) was generated and analyzed to profile focal amplifications and genomic characteristics. BCs were categorized into three prognostic groups: primary with dismal prognosis (TP-D; total N = 34; HER2+ N = 12), primary with good prognosis (TP-ND, total N = 31; HER2+ N = 6), and metastatic (TM; total N = 10; HER2+ N = 6). Genomic characteristics including focal amplifications were compared between these three prognostic groups. Results: Interchromosomal focal amplifications co-carrying ERBB2/CDK12/C17orf37 were highly prevalent in HER2+ TM (5/6: 83.3%) and TP-D (10/12: 83.3%) patients compared to HER2+ TP-ND (1/6: 16.7%) (P = 0.040 in TM vs TP-ND; P = 0.013 in TP-D vs TP-ND; one-sided Fisher’s exact tests), indicating that those amplifications may be early events during aggressive tumor progression in HER2+ BCs. Interestingly, we also found that interchromosomal oncogenic focal amplifications cargo more oncogenes as the patients carrying those amplifications have worse prognosis (TP-ND: mean 6.5 oncogenes; TP-D: mean 15.3 oncogenes; TM: mean 21.4 oncogenes present in interchromosomal oncogenic focal amplification), which was statistically significant (P = 0.0043 in TM vs. TP-ND; P = 0.034 in TP-D vs TP-ND; wilcox ranksum test). CONCLUSION: The high prevalence of ERBB2/CDK12/C17orf37 co-amplified interchromosomal focal amplifications in HER2+ poor prognosis groups (TM and TP-D) indicate a role for these amplicons in tumor progression. Additionally, the correlation between an increasing number of oncogenes in interchromosomal focal amplifications and poor prognosis suggests that these amplifications may evolve by accumulating oncogenic elements during tumor progression, thereby promoting tumor aggressiveness. Citation Format: J. Kim1, C. HyeongJin2, H. Lee3, E. Cho3, J. Lee4, S. Kim4, Y. Park1, H. Kim2. Inter-chromosomal focal amplifications frequently co-carry multiple oncogenes in aggressive breast cancer, accumulating oncogenic elements during breast cancer progression [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cli
背景:已知局灶性拷贝数扩增在乳腺癌(BC)的发生中起着至关重要的作用。特别是染色体间致癌易位的扩增,如t(8;11)、t(8,17)和t(11;17)是已知的bc的主要特征。然而,缺乏临床证据表明这种染色体间局灶性扩增促进肿瘤进展。在这里,我们调查了在一家医院收集的原发性和转移性bc的染色体间局灶扩增的患病率。方法:从NAC(新辅助化疗)治愈性手术后获得的BC手术标本中收集65例原发肿瘤,并从辅助后活检中收集10例转移性BC肿瘤。生成并分析全基因组测序(肿瘤平均覆盖62X,范围51 ~ 74X;患者匹配正常血液平均覆盖33X,范围30 ~ 40X),以描绘病灶扩增和基因组特征。将bc分为预后较差的原发性(TP-D,总N = 34; HER2+ N = 12)、预后较好的原发性(TP-ND,总N = 31; HER2+ N = 6)和转移性(TM,总N = 10; HER2+ N = 6) 3组。基因组特征包括病灶扩增在这三个预后组之间进行比较。结果:与HER2+ TP-ND(1/6: 16.7%)相比,HER2+ TM(5/6: 83.3%)和TP-D(10/12: 83.3%)患者的染色体间局灶性扩增(10/12:83.3%)非常普遍(TM vs TP-ND P = 0.040; TP-D vs TP-ND P = 0.013;单侧Fisher精确检验),表明这些扩增可能是HER2+ bc侵袭性肿瘤进展的早期事件。有趣的是,我们还发现染色体间癌灶扩增携带更多的癌基因,携带这些扩增的患者预后较差(染色体间癌灶扩增中TP-ND:平均6.5个癌基因;TP-D:平均15.3个癌基因;TM:平均21.4个癌基因),差异有统计学意义(TM vs TP-ND P = 0.0043; TP-D vs TP-ND P = 0.034; wilcox秩和检验)。结论:ERBB2/CDK12/C17orf37共扩增染色体间局灶扩增在HER2+不良预后组(TM和TP-D)的高患病率表明这些扩增在肿瘤进展中起作用。此外,染色体间局灶扩增中癌基因数量的增加与预后不良之间的相关性表明,这些扩增可能通过在肿瘤进展过程中积累致癌因子而进化,从而促进肿瘤的侵袭性。引用格式:金J. 1,金C. HyeongJin2,李H. 3,赵e . 3,李J. 4,金S. 4,朴Y. 1,金H. 2。在侵袭性乳腺癌中,染色体间局灶扩增经常共同携带多个癌基因,在乳腺癌进展过程中积累致癌因子[摘要]。摘自:《2025年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集》;2025年12月9-12日;费城(PA): AACR;临床癌症杂志2026;32(4增刊):nr PS3-04-03。
{"title":"Abstract PS3-04-03: Inter-chromosomal focal amplifications frequently co-carry multiple oncogenes in aggressive breast cancer, accumulating oncogenic elements during breast cancer progression","authors":"J. Kim, C. HyeongJin, H. Lee, E. Cho, J. Lee, S. Kim, Y. Park, H. Kim","doi":"10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps3-04-03","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps3-04-03","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Focal copy number amplification is known to play a crucial role in oncogenesis of breast cancer (BC). Especially, the amplification of interchromosomal oncogenic translocation such as t(8;11), t(8,17) and t(11;17) is known to be the main feature of BCs. However, there is a lack of clinical evidence that such interchromosomal focal amplifications promotes tumor progression. Here, we investigated the prevalence of interchromosomal focal amplifications in primary and metastatic BCs collected at a single hospital. METHODS: 65 primary tumors were collected from BC surgical specimens obtained after curative surgery following NAC (neoadjuvant chemotherapy), and 10 metastatic BC tumors from post-adjuvant biopsies. Whole genome sequencing (mean coverage 62X, range 51∼74X for tumors; mean coverage 33X, range 30∼40X for patient-matching normal bloods) was generated and analyzed to profile focal amplifications and genomic characteristics. BCs were categorized into three prognostic groups: primary with dismal prognosis (TP-D; total N = 34; HER2+ N = 12), primary with good prognosis (TP-ND, total N = 31; HER2+ N = 6), and metastatic (TM; total N = 10; HER2+ N = 6). Genomic characteristics including focal amplifications were compared between these three prognostic groups. Results: Interchromosomal focal amplifications co-carrying ERBB2/CDK12/C17orf37 were highly prevalent in HER2+ TM (5/6: 83.3%) and TP-D (10/12: 83.3%) patients compared to HER2+ TP-ND (1/6: 16.7%) (P = 0.040 in TM vs TP-ND; P = 0.013 in TP-D vs TP-ND; one-sided Fisher’s exact tests), indicating that those amplifications may be early events during aggressive tumor progression in HER2+ BCs. Interestingly, we also found that interchromosomal oncogenic focal amplifications cargo more oncogenes as the patients carrying those amplifications have worse prognosis (TP-ND: mean 6.5 oncogenes; TP-D: mean 15.3 oncogenes; TM: mean 21.4 oncogenes present in interchromosomal oncogenic focal amplification), which was statistically significant (P = 0.0043 in TM vs. TP-ND; P = 0.034 in TP-D vs TP-ND; wilcox ranksum test). CONCLUSION: The high prevalence of ERBB2/CDK12/C17orf37 co-amplified interchromosomal focal amplifications in HER2+ poor prognosis groups (TM and TP-D) indicate a role for these amplicons in tumor progression. Additionally, the correlation between an increasing number of oncogenes in interchromosomal focal amplifications and poor prognosis suggests that these amplifications may evolve by accumulating oncogenic elements during tumor progression, thereby promoting tumor aggressiveness. Citation Format: J. Kim1, C. HyeongJin2, H. Lee3, E. Cho3, J. Lee4, S. Kim4, Y. Park1, H. Kim2. Inter-chromosomal focal amplifications frequently co-carry multiple oncogenes in aggressive breast cancer, accumulating oncogenic elements during breast cancer progression [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cli","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":"96 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146230792","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract PS2-07-28: Immune microenvironment features of germline mutation-associated breast tumors revealed by single-molecule imaging in the Breast Cancer Family Registry 摘要PS2-07-28:乳腺癌家族登记处单分子成像显示生殖系突变相关乳腺肿瘤的免疫微环境特征
IF 11.5 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-20 DOI: 10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps2-07-28
M. B. McClure, L. Mangiante, C. Weiss, Z. Ma, J. Koo, E. M. John, C. Curtis, J. Caswell-Jin, A. W. Kurian
Background: Single-cell spatial profiling enables detailed insights into the tumor microenvironment while maintaining the native tissue context. Germline pathogenic variants (PVs) are associated with decreased lymphocyte and increased tumor-associated macrophages from bulk transcriptomic data; however, this relationship has yet to be deconvoluted. To examine how spatial features vary by germline cancer predisposition, we performed single-molecule RNA imaging in a racially and ethnically diverse cohort with detailed genetic and clinical annotation. Methods: We performed single molecule RNA imaging on the Bruker CosMx platform of a cohort in the population-based Northern California Breast Cancer Family Registry (NC-BCFR) consisting of 222 samples from 144 women diagnosed 1995-2005 with &gt;20 years of follow-up. We deployed an in-house machine learning pipeline to perform imaging-based cell segmentation and quantification of cell-level transcriptomic data for 6,519 genes across 1,083,345 cells. Normalization for each of 9 tissue microarrays and batch integration was followed by cell typing using well-established canonical markers and the reference-based SingleR algorithm. Spatial transcriptomics data were used to predict tumor HER2 and hormone receptor status (HR). Cell neighborhood was determined by scikit NearestNeighbors package with neighborhood number determined by finding the inflection point in an ElbowPlot analysis. Co-localization was defined with the colocation quotient analysis. We performed univariate and multivariate analyses to examine the correlation of germline PV status, race/ethnicity, age, tumor stage, and tumor subtype with proportion of each identified cell neighborhood. P-values were corrected for multiple hypothesis testing using Benjamini-Hochberg correction. Results: Of 144 NC-BCFR participants, 28 (19.4%) had at least one germline PV, with 11 BRCA1, 8 BRCA2, 3 PALB2, 2 ATM, and 1 FANCM PV represented. Tumor samples with germline PVs globally contained increased regulatory T cells and CD8+ T cell (Wilcox FDR=0.0059, 0.0070) and decreased fibroblast (Wilcoxon FDR=0.0085) populations compared to non-PV tumors. Cell neighborhood analysis defined 12 distinct microenvironmental compartments including including cancer core (4 distinct clusters), epithelial/fibrotic, epithelial-innate immune, stromal, adaptive immune, innate immune, fibrotic-immune depleted, and mixed (2 clusters). Tumor samples with germline PVs were enriched for neighborhood 0 (Wilcoxon FDR&lt;.001), defined by adaptive B (19%) and T lymphocytes (36%), of which 30% were CD4+, 26% are CD8+, 34% regulatory T cells, and 9.6% NK cells. In a multivariate model that included clinical subtype, age, race/ethnicity, and stage as covariates, the association between germline pathogenic PV and proportion neighborhood 0 remained significant (multivariate p=0.0035). We observed an increase in co-localization of cancer epithelial cells to CD8+ T cells (Wilcoxon FDR= 0.
背景:单细胞空间分析可以在保持原生组织背景的同时详细了解肿瘤微环境。从大量转录组学数据来看,种系致病变异(pv)与淋巴细胞减少和肿瘤相关巨噬细胞增加有关;然而,这种关系还有待厘清。为了研究空间特征如何随生殖系癌症易感性而变化,我们在一个种族和民族多样化的队列中进行了单分子RNA成像,并进行了详细的遗传和临床注释。方法:我们在以人群为基础的北加州乳腺癌家庭登记处(NC-BCFR)的一个队列的Bruker CosMx平台上进行了单分子RNA成像,该队列包括222个样本,来自1995-2005年诊断为&;gt;20年的随访。我们部署了内部机器学习管道,对1,083,345个细胞中的6,519个基因进行基于成像的细胞分割和细胞水平转录组数据的量化。对9个组织微阵列中的每一个进行归一化和批量整合,然后使用完善的规范标记和基于参考的SingleR算法进行细胞分型。空间转录组学数据用于预测肿瘤HER2和激素受体状态(HR)。细胞邻域由scikit NearestNeighbors包确定,邻域数由ElbowPlot分析中找到拐点确定。用配位商分析法定义共定位。我们进行了单变量和多变量分析,以检查生殖系PV状态、种族/民族、年龄、肿瘤分期和肿瘤亚型与每个已鉴定细胞邻域的比例的相关性。采用Benjamini-Hochberg校正对多重假设检验的p值进行校正。结果:144名NC-BCFR参与者中,28名(19.4%)至少有一种种系PV,其中11名BRCA1, 8名BRCA2, 3名PALB2, 2名ATM和1名FANCM PV代表。与非pv肿瘤相比,全球存在种系pv的肿瘤样本中调节性T细胞和CD8+ T细胞数量增加(Wilcox FDR=0.0059, 0.0070),成纤维细胞数量减少(Wilcoxon FDR=0.0085)。细胞邻域分析定义了12个不同的微环境区室,包括癌症核心(4个不同的簇)、上皮/纤维化、上皮-先天免疫、基质、适应性免疫、先天免疫、纤维化-免疫耗尽和混合(2个簇)。具有种系pv的肿瘤样品富集于邻近0 (Wilcoxon FDR<)。001),由适应性B细胞(19%)和T淋巴细胞(36%)定义,其中30%为CD4+, 26%为CD8+, 34%为调节性T细胞,9.6%为NK细胞。在包括临床亚型、年龄、种族/民族和分期为协变量的多变量模型中,种系致病性PV与邻域0比例之间的相关性仍然显著(多变量p=0.0035)。我们观察到,生殖系PV携带者与非携带者相比,肿瘤内肿瘤上皮细胞向CD8+ T细胞(Wilcoxon FDR= 0.0306)和巨噬细胞(Wilcoxon FDR=0.0349)的共定位增加。结论:肿瘤细胞与宿主免疫系统之间的动态相互作用可通过单分子空间转录组分析被捕获。在多样化的、基于人群的、具有遗传特征的NC-BCFR中,我们观察到种系PV携带者与非携带者的适应性肿瘤免疫环境存在实质性差异。我们的研究结果表明,遗传风险塑造了肿瘤免疫景观,这可能为优化生殖系靶向治疗的策略提供信息。引用格式:乳腺癌家族登记处单分子成像揭示的生殖系突变相关乳腺肿瘤的免疫微环境特征。乳腺癌家族登记处单分子成像揭示的种系突变相关乳腺肿瘤的免疫微环境特征[摘要]。摘自:《2025年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集》;2025年12月9-12日;费城(PA): AACR;临床癌症杂志2026;32(4增刊):nr PS2-07-28。
{"title":"Abstract PS2-07-28: Immune microenvironment features of germline mutation-associated breast tumors revealed by single-molecule imaging in the Breast Cancer Family Registry","authors":"M. B. McClure, L. Mangiante, C. Weiss, Z. Ma, J. Koo, E. M. John, C. Curtis, J. Caswell-Jin, A. W. Kurian","doi":"10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps2-07-28","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps2-07-28","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Single-cell spatial profiling enables detailed insights into the tumor microenvironment while maintaining the native tissue context. Germline pathogenic variants (PVs) are associated with decreased lymphocyte and increased tumor-associated macrophages from bulk transcriptomic data; however, this relationship has yet to be deconvoluted. To examine how spatial features vary by germline cancer predisposition, we performed single-molecule RNA imaging in a racially and ethnically diverse cohort with detailed genetic and clinical annotation. Methods: We performed single molecule RNA imaging on the Bruker CosMx platform of a cohort in the population-based Northern California Breast Cancer Family Registry (NC-BCFR) consisting of 222 samples from 144 women diagnosed 1995-2005 with &amp;gt;20 years of follow-up. We deployed an in-house machine learning pipeline to perform imaging-based cell segmentation and quantification of cell-level transcriptomic data for 6,519 genes across 1,083,345 cells. Normalization for each of 9 tissue microarrays and batch integration was followed by cell typing using well-established canonical markers and the reference-based SingleR algorithm. Spatial transcriptomics data were used to predict tumor HER2 and hormone receptor status (HR). Cell neighborhood was determined by scikit NearestNeighbors package with neighborhood number determined by finding the inflection point in an ElbowPlot analysis. Co-localization was defined with the colocation quotient analysis. We performed univariate and multivariate analyses to examine the correlation of germline PV status, race/ethnicity, age, tumor stage, and tumor subtype with proportion of each identified cell neighborhood. P-values were corrected for multiple hypothesis testing using Benjamini-Hochberg correction. Results: Of 144 NC-BCFR participants, 28 (19.4%) had at least one germline PV, with 11 BRCA1, 8 BRCA2, 3 PALB2, 2 ATM, and 1 FANCM PV represented. Tumor samples with germline PVs globally contained increased regulatory T cells and CD8+ T cell (Wilcox FDR=0.0059, 0.0070) and decreased fibroblast (Wilcoxon FDR=0.0085) populations compared to non-PV tumors. Cell neighborhood analysis defined 12 distinct microenvironmental compartments including including cancer core (4 distinct clusters), epithelial/fibrotic, epithelial-innate immune, stromal, adaptive immune, innate immune, fibrotic-immune depleted, and mixed (2 clusters). Tumor samples with germline PVs were enriched for neighborhood 0 (Wilcoxon FDR&amp;lt;.001), defined by adaptive B (19%) and T lymphocytes (36%), of which 30% were CD4+, 26% are CD8+, 34% regulatory T cells, and 9.6% NK cells. In a multivariate model that included clinical subtype, age, race/ethnicity, and stage as covariates, the association between germline pathogenic PV and proportion neighborhood 0 remained significant (multivariate p=0.0035). We observed an increase in co-localization of cancer epithelial cells to CD8+ T cells (Wilcoxon FDR= 0.","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146230797","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract PS5-10-10: “You have to work with me”: a thematic analysis of patient experiences in breast cancer treatment decision-making 摘要PS5-10-10:“You have to work with me”:乳腺癌治疗决策中患者经历的专题分析
IF 11.5 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-20 DOI: 10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps5-10-10
M. E. Boll, L. J. Schmitt, L. Rabinovich, H. M. Earl, M. E. Peek, A. Wesevich
Background: Shared decision-making has been increasingly incorporated into guidelines for breast cancer care. However, there has been little study on how patients with breast cancer are presented with options in their care and the level of involvement they prefer. When deciding between non-inferior options such as 6 versus 12 months of adjuvant trastuzumab, shared decision-making and elicitation of patient preferences are critical. In this study, we sought to understand patient communication preferences and their prior experiences with oncologists regarding decision-making in their breast cancer treatment. Methods: We recruited 20 people diagnosed with breast cancer in the past year from across the US to participate in semi-structured interviews regarding their cancer journeys, experiences with treatment decision-making, and communication with their oncologist. Participants were also presented with an infographic displaying the efficacy and toxicity of 6 versus 12 months of adjuvant trastuzumab for early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer to elicit feedback on the presentation of data as well as their prior experiences with oncologists sharing data in their treatment process. Interviews were transcribed and deidentified before being independently coded by two study team members using Dedoose. Discordant coding was reconciled for each transcript. Themes were identified via inductive thematic analysis. Results: Participants shared both positive and negative factors that contributed to their experiences of breast cancer treatment decision-making. Positive factors were patient engagement in care, patient-centered communication, support systems, and socioeconomic advantage. Negative factors were insufficient explanations, ineffective oncologist communication, higher degree of mental and physical treatment burdens, and systemic barriers to care. Participants frequently shared that oncologists did not present them with treatment options, with one participant stating, “Not a lot of this is my choice, you know? It’s just, ‘This is the treatment.’” There were various preferences regarding control in their care, ranging from one participant saying, “just give me whatever you need to make me feel better” to another sharing, “I feel like that's my choice, so I should decide, but I do want the doctor to have ideas about what's going on.” Participants also appreciated the infographic and wished a similar tool had been used in their own care to help them better engage in treatment decision-making conversations. All patients interviewed expressed a desire for more information in their breast cancer care. Conclusion: We identified factors that support or inhibit patient involvement in shared decision-making for breast cancer treatment. While patients varied in how much they wanted to be involved in final decisions, there was a consensus overall that patients wanted more information-sharing and more deliberation about treatment options, two core components of shared
背景:共同决策已越来越多地纳入乳腺癌护理指南。然而,很少有研究表明乳腺癌患者在护理中是如何选择的,以及他们喜欢的参与程度。当在非劣效性选择(如6个月或12个月的辅助曲妥珠单抗)之间做出决定时,共同决策和引起患者偏好至关重要。在这项研究中,我们试图了解患者的沟通偏好以及他们在乳腺癌治疗决策方面与肿瘤学家的经验。方法:我们从美国各地招募了20名在过去一年中被诊断为乳腺癌的人,参与了半结构化的访谈,内容包括他们的癌症之旅、治疗决策的经历以及与肿瘤科医生的沟通。参与者还获得了一个信息图,显示了6个月与12个月的辅助曲妥珠单抗治疗早期her2阳性乳腺癌的疗效和毒性,以引发对数据呈现的反馈以及他们在治疗过程中与肿瘤学家共享数据的先前经验。访谈被转录和去识别,然后由两名研究小组成员使用Dedoose独立编码。每个转录本的不一致编码被调和。通过归纳主题分析确定主题。结果:参与者分享了影响他们乳腺癌治疗决策的积极和消极因素。积极因素包括患者参与护理、以患者为中心的沟通、支持系统和社会经济优势。负面因素为解释不充分、肿瘤医师沟通无效、精神和身体治疗负担加重、系统性护理障碍。参与者经常分享肿瘤学家没有向他们提供治疗方案,一位参与者说,“这不是我的选择,你知道吗?只是,‘这就是治疗方法。’”在控制治疗方面,他们有不同的偏好,从一位参与者说,“给我任何你需要的东西,让我感觉好一点就行了”,到另一位参与者说,“我觉得这是我的选择,所以我应该决定,但我确实希望医生知道发生了什么。”与会者还赞赏信息图表,并希望在他们自己的护理中使用类似的工具,以帮助他们更好地参与治疗决策对话。所有接受采访的患者都表示希望了解更多有关乳腺癌护理的信息。结论:我们确定了支持或抑制患者参与乳腺癌治疗共同决策的因素。虽然患者在参与最终决策的程度上有所不同,但总体上有一个共识,即患者希望更多地分享信息,更多地考虑治疗方案,这是共同决策的两个核心组成部分。将疗效和毒性信息以信息图表的形式呈现给乳腺癌患者,可能会提高他们参与共同决策的能力,特别是对于非劣质乳腺癌治疗方案。引用格式:M. E. Boll, L. J. Schmitt, L. Rabinovich, H. M. Earl, M. E. Peek, A. Wesevich。“你必须和我一起工作”:对乳腺癌治疗决策中患者经历的专题分析[摘要]。摘自:《2025年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集》;2025年12月9-12日;费城(PA): AACR;临床癌症杂志2026;32(4增补):nr PS5-10-10
{"title":"Abstract PS5-10-10: “You have to work with me”: a thematic analysis of patient experiences in breast cancer treatment decision-making","authors":"M. E. Boll, L. J. Schmitt, L. Rabinovich, H. M. Earl, M. E. Peek, A. Wesevich","doi":"10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps5-10-10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps5-10-10","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Shared decision-making has been increasingly incorporated into guidelines for breast cancer care. However, there has been little study on how patients with breast cancer are presented with options in their care and the level of involvement they prefer. When deciding between non-inferior options such as 6 versus 12 months of adjuvant trastuzumab, shared decision-making and elicitation of patient preferences are critical. In this study, we sought to understand patient communication preferences and their prior experiences with oncologists regarding decision-making in their breast cancer treatment. Methods: We recruited 20 people diagnosed with breast cancer in the past year from across the US to participate in semi-structured interviews regarding their cancer journeys, experiences with treatment decision-making, and communication with their oncologist. Participants were also presented with an infographic displaying the efficacy and toxicity of 6 versus 12 months of adjuvant trastuzumab for early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer to elicit feedback on the presentation of data as well as their prior experiences with oncologists sharing data in their treatment process. Interviews were transcribed and deidentified before being independently coded by two study team members using Dedoose. Discordant coding was reconciled for each transcript. Themes were identified via inductive thematic analysis. Results: Participants shared both positive and negative factors that contributed to their experiences of breast cancer treatment decision-making. Positive factors were patient engagement in care, patient-centered communication, support systems, and socioeconomic advantage. Negative factors were insufficient explanations, ineffective oncologist communication, higher degree of mental and physical treatment burdens, and systemic barriers to care. Participants frequently shared that oncologists did not present them with treatment options, with one participant stating, “Not a lot of this is my choice, you know? It’s just, ‘This is the treatment.’” There were various preferences regarding control in their care, ranging from one participant saying, “just give me whatever you need to make me feel better” to another sharing, “I feel like that's my choice, so I should decide, but I do want the doctor to have ideas about what's going on.” Participants also appreciated the infographic and wished a similar tool had been used in their own care to help them better engage in treatment decision-making conversations. All patients interviewed expressed a desire for more information in their breast cancer care. Conclusion: We identified factors that support or inhibit patient involvement in shared decision-making for breast cancer treatment. While patients varied in how much they wanted to be involved in final decisions, there was a consensus overall that patients wanted more information-sharing and more deliberation about treatment options, two core components of shared","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146230839","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract PS5-03-01: Phase I Study of Stereotactic Radiation and Sacituzumab Govitecan with Zimberelimab in the Management of Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer with Brain Metastases PS5-03-01:立体定向放疗、Sacituzumab Govitecan联合Zimberelimab治疗转移性三阴性乳腺癌伴脑转移的I期研究
IF 11.5 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-20 DOI: 10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps5-03-01
K. A. Ahmed, Y. Kim, R. Dowell, D. Oliver, M. Mills, R. Nair, A. Armaghani, R. Costa, T. O'Connor, G. Rajasekaran Rathnakumar, H. Soliman, A. Soyano, E. Tan-Chiu, P. Forsyth, J. Arrington, H. Yu, H. Han
Background: The prognosis and quality of life for triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) brain metastases remains poor. Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) has shown potential blood brain barrier (BBB) penetration in preclinical and clinical settings with anti-tumor activity in the phase III ASCENT Trial (NCT02574455). Radiotherapy can open the BBB and has been shown to be safe in combination with anti-PD-1 therapy in our previous study (NCT03807765). Combining radiation with the anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody, zimberelimab, and SG may provide a synergistic anti-tumor approach. Methods: The study is designed as a single-arm, nonrandomized, open-label, phase I/II trial of SG and zimberelimab with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) among patients with metastatic TNBC with brain metastases. The primary endpoint is neurologic toxicity defined by CTCAE v5 criteria (phase I) assessed via a 3+3 design. Eligibility includes TNBC patients ≥ 18 years old with brain metastases eligible for SRS with at least one measurable lesion ≥ 0.5 cm per RANO-BM criteria. Treatment is initiated with SRS followed 1 week later by SG on days 1 and 8 (10 mg/kg) with zimberelimab on day 1 (360 mg IV) repeated every 3 weeks. Phase I results are reported, clinical trial information: NCT06238921. Results: Three patients were enrolled between December 2024 through April 2025. Median age was 56 (range: 49-57) with a baseline KPS of 90 in 2 patients and 70 in 1 patient. Median lines of prior systemic therapy in the stage IV setting was 1 (range 0-2). No intracranial dose limiting toxicities were noted. The most common grade ≥ 2 adverse events were neutropenia in 3 patients (100%) (grade 4 in 1 and grade 2 in 2 patients) and grade 2 fatigue in 1 patient. The best RANO-BM intracranial response has been a partial response (PR) in 3 patients (100%). The best irRECIST systemic response has been a PR (n=1), stable disease (n=1), and progressive disease (n=1). Two patients continue study therapy currently. No deaths have occurred. Conclusions: Results from the phase I portion reveals safety of a combined approach. Efficacy continues to be assessed in the phase II portion. Citation Format: K. A. Ahmed, Y. Kim, R. Dowell, D. Oliver, M. Mills, R. Nair, A. Armaghani, R. Costa, T. O'Connor, G. Rajasekaran Rathnakumar, H. Soliman, A. Soyano, E. Tan-Chiu, P. Forsyth, J. Arrington, H. Yu, H. Han. Phase I Study of Stereotactic Radiation and Sacituzumab Govitecan with Zimberelimab in the Management of Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer with Brain Metastases [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl): nr PS5-03-01.
背景:三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)脑转移的预后和生活质量仍然很差。在ASCENT III期临床试验(NCT02574455)中,Sacituzumab govitecan (SG)在临床前和临床环境中显示出潜在的血脑屏障(BBB)穿透能力,具有抗肿瘤活性。放疗可以打开血脑屏障,并且在我们之前的研究(NCT03807765)中已证明与抗pd -1治疗联合使用是安全的。放射联合抗pd -1单克隆抗体、zimberelimab和SG可能提供一种协同抗肿瘤的方法。方法:该研究是一项单臂、非随机、开放标签的I/II期试验,SG和zimberelimab联合立体定向放射手术(SRS)治疗转移性TNBC伴脑转移患者。主要终点是CTCAE v5标准定义的神经毒性(I期),通过3+3设计评估。资格包括≥18岁的TNBC患者,脑转移,符合SRS标准,根据RANO-BM标准至少有一个可测量的病变≥0.5 cm。治疗开始时使用SRS, 1周后在第1天和第8天使用SG (10 mg/kg),第1天使用zimberelimab (360 mg IV),每3周重复一次。I期结果报告,临床试验信息:NCT06238921。结果:三名患者在2024年12月至2025年4月期间入组。中位年龄为56岁(范围:49-57岁),基线KPS 2例为90,1例为70。IV期既往全身治疗的中位线为1(范围0-2)。未发现颅内剂量限制性毒性。最常见的≥2级不良事件为3例(100%)中性粒细胞减少(1例为4级,2例为2级)和1例为2级疲劳。3例患者(100%)的最佳RANO-BM颅内缓解为部分缓解(PR)。最佳的irRECIST全身反应是PR (n=1)、病情稳定(n=1)和病情进展(n=1)。两名患者目前仍在继续研究治疗。没有人死亡。结论:I期部分的结果显示联合入路的安全性。疗效继续在II期部分进行评估。引文格式:K. A. Ahmed, Y. Kim, R. Dowell, D. Oliver, M. Mills, R. Nair, A. Armaghani, R. Costa, T. O'Connor, G. Rajasekaran Rathnakumar, H. Soliman, A. Soyano, E. Tan-Chiu, P. Forsyth, J. Arrington, H. Yu, H. Han。立体定向放疗、Sacituzumab Govitecan联合Zimberelimab治疗转移性三阴性乳腺癌伴脑转移的I期研究[摘要]。摘自:《2025年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集》;2025年12月9-12日;费城(PA): AACR;临床癌症杂志2026;32(4增刊):nr PS5-03-01。
{"title":"Abstract PS5-03-01: Phase I Study of Stereotactic Radiation and Sacituzumab Govitecan with Zimberelimab in the Management of Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer with Brain Metastases","authors":"K. A. Ahmed, Y. Kim, R. Dowell, D. Oliver, M. Mills, R. Nair, A. Armaghani, R. Costa, T. O'Connor, G. Rajasekaran Rathnakumar, H. Soliman, A. Soyano, E. Tan-Chiu, P. Forsyth, J. Arrington, H. Yu, H. Han","doi":"10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps5-03-01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps5-03-01","url":null,"abstract":"Background: The prognosis and quality of life for triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) brain metastases remains poor. Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) has shown potential blood brain barrier (BBB) penetration in preclinical and clinical settings with anti-tumor activity in the phase III ASCENT Trial (NCT02574455). Radiotherapy can open the BBB and has been shown to be safe in combination with anti-PD-1 therapy in our previous study (NCT03807765). Combining radiation with the anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody, zimberelimab, and SG may provide a synergistic anti-tumor approach. Methods: The study is designed as a single-arm, nonrandomized, open-label, phase I/II trial of SG and zimberelimab with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) among patients with metastatic TNBC with brain metastases. The primary endpoint is neurologic toxicity defined by CTCAE v5 criteria (phase I) assessed via a 3+3 design. Eligibility includes TNBC patients ≥ 18 years old with brain metastases eligible for SRS with at least one measurable lesion ≥ 0.5 cm per RANO-BM criteria. Treatment is initiated with SRS followed 1 week later by SG on days 1 and 8 (10 mg/kg) with zimberelimab on day 1 (360 mg IV) repeated every 3 weeks. Phase I results are reported, clinical trial information: NCT06238921. Results: Three patients were enrolled between December 2024 through April 2025. Median age was 56 (range: 49-57) with a baseline KPS of 90 in 2 patients and 70 in 1 patient. Median lines of prior systemic therapy in the stage IV setting was 1 (range 0-2). No intracranial dose limiting toxicities were noted. The most common grade ≥ 2 adverse events were neutropenia in 3 patients (100%) (grade 4 in 1 and grade 2 in 2 patients) and grade 2 fatigue in 1 patient. The best RANO-BM intracranial response has been a partial response (PR) in 3 patients (100%). The best irRECIST systemic response has been a PR (n=1), stable disease (n=1), and progressive disease (n=1). Two patients continue study therapy currently. No deaths have occurred. Conclusions: Results from the phase I portion reveals safety of a combined approach. Efficacy continues to be assessed in the phase II portion. Citation Format: K. A. Ahmed, Y. Kim, R. Dowell, D. Oliver, M. Mills, R. Nair, A. Armaghani, R. Costa, T. O'Connor, G. Rajasekaran Rathnakumar, H. Soliman, A. Soyano, E. Tan-Chiu, P. Forsyth, J. Arrington, H. Yu, H. Han. Phase I Study of Stereotactic Radiation and Sacituzumab Govitecan with Zimberelimab in the Management of Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer with Brain Metastases [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl): nr PS5-03-01.","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146230640","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract PS3-01-12: Wisdom and mypebs: personalized breast cancer screening trials operating in distinct international contexts 摘要PS3-01-12:智慧与mypebs:在不同的国际背景下进行的个性化乳腺癌筛查试验
IF 11.5 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-20 DOI: 10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps3-01-12
K. Leggat-Barr, P. Giorgi Rossi, M. Guindy, F. Gilbert, M. Roman, J. Burrion, H. De Koning, S. de Montgolfier, L. Giordano, D. Keatley, J. Deleuze, E. Gauthier, S. Michiels, C. Vissac-Sabatier, H. Anton-Culver, S. Borowsky, S. Brain, J. Esserman, E. Ziv, A. Fiscalini, D. Goodman-Gruen, D. Heditsian, R. Hiatt, V. Lee, D. Moorehead, A. Naiem, O. Olopade, H. Park, B. Parker, A. Petruse, M. Scheuner, L. van ‘t Veer, V. Arasu, M. Eklund, L. Madlensky, Y. Shieh, N. Wenger, J. Tice, C. Kaplan, A. Kaster, R. Lancaster, A. LaCroix, S. Delaloge, L. Esserman
Background WISDOM (Women Informed to Screen Depending on Measures of risk) (NCT02620852) and MyPeBS (My Personal Breast Screening) (NCT03672331) are two prominent risk-based breast cancer screening (RBS) trials based in the US and Europe & Israel, respectively. Both trials aim to assess whether RBS is as safe as current screening (no increase incidence of stage&gt; II/IIB breast cancers) and can aid to enhance resources on those at higher risk, while minimizing harm to those at lowest risk. WISDOM and MyPeBS were conducted independently but with a planned joint analysis. Guidelines in the US range from annual (ACR, NCCN) to biennial screening starting at age 40 (USPSTF). In contrast, screening in MyPeBS countries is population-based by invitation every 2 years in (France, Belgium, Italy, Spain, Israel) and every 3 years in the UK starting at age 50. We will compare the baseline characteristics of both cohorts. Methods Eligibility included ages 40-74 in WISDOM and 40-70 in MyPeBS and no prior breast cancer history. Both are randomized 1:1 to RBS vs. country-based standard of care screening, though in WISDOM, women could choose their arm if they declined randomization (pragmatic, preference tolerant approach). Methods of recruitment reflect systematic/screening invitation (EU) vs. opportunistic (US). In WISDOM, the 5-year risk of invasive BC is estimated using the Breast Cancer Screening Consortium (BCSC) score, which includes clinical data & breast density, combined with a Polygenic Risk Score (PRS) (up to 126 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)), & a panel to identify germline mutations in 9 breast cancer risk genes. Four categories were used to classify risk (lowest, average, elevated, & highest), with corresponding screening assignments: age-based (mammogram (Mg) starting at 50), two-year (average), one-year moderate risk (MR), or Q6 (alternating Mg and MRI every 6 months). MR/Q6 includes breast health specialist consultation to discuss risk reduction and the Breast Health Decisions tool (automated risk/prevention recommendations, which is available to all patients). In MyPeBS, the 5-year risk is estimated using the Mammorisk™/BCSC model + PRS 313, or Tyrer-Cuzick (TC) + PRS 313 among women who have &gt;1 first-degree family history of breast cancer (FDFH) with BC. Absolute risk cutoffs are defined as ‘low’ (&lt;1%), ‘average’ (1–1.66%), ‘high’ (&gt;1.66–6%), and ‘very high’ (≥6%) with corresponding screening assignments: next Mg at 4 years, Mg every 2 years, annually, or annually + MRI. Results WISDOM and MyPeBS enrollment was 46,289 and 53,143 women, respectively. Using the MyPeBS absolute risk cutoffs, the risk distribution for WISDOM and MyPeBS respectively were similar: ‘very high,’ (1% vs. 2%); ‘high’ (31% vs 33%), ‘average’ (26% vs 29%) & ‘low’ (40% vs 37%). Between the two trials, the screening recommendations for the low-risk group were the most different: every 2 years starting at 50 in WISDOM vs
WISDOM(女性根据风险指标接受筛查)(NCT02620852)和MyPeBS(我的个人乳房筛查)(NCT03672331)是分别在美国和欧洲和以色列进行的两项著名的基于风险的乳腺癌筛查(RBS)试验。两项试验都旨在评估RBS是否与目前的筛查一样安全(不增加II/IIB期乳腺癌的发病率),并有助于增加对高风险患者的资源,同时将对最低风险患者的伤害降到最低。WISDOM和MyPeBS是独立进行的,但有计划的联合分析。美国的指南范围从每年一次(ACR, NCCN)到从40岁开始的两年一次筛查(USPSTF)。相比之下,在MyPeBS国家(法国、比利时、意大利、西班牙、以色列),每2年邀请一次筛查,在英国每3年邀请一次筛查,从50岁开始。我们将比较两个队列的基线特征。研究对象为WISDOM患者年龄40-74岁,MyPeBS患者年龄40-70岁,既往无乳腺癌病史。两者都是1:1随机分配到RBS和基于国家的标准护理筛查,尽管在WISDOM中,如果女性拒绝随机分配,她们可以选择她们的手臂(实用的,偏好宽容的方法)。招聘方法反映了系统/筛选邀请(欧盟)与机会主义(美国)。在WISDOM中,浸润性BC的5年风险是使用乳腺癌筛查联盟(BCSC)评分来评估的,该评分包括临床数据和乳腺密度,结合多基因风险评分(PRS)(多达126个单核苷酸多态性(snp)),以及一个鉴定9个乳腺癌风险基因种系突变的小组。风险分为四类(最低、平均、升高、最高),并有相应的筛查分配:基于年龄(50岁开始的乳房x光检查(Mg),两年(平均),一年中度风险(MR),或Q6(每6个月交替进行Mg和MRI)。MR/Q6包括乳房健康专家咨询,讨论减少风险和乳房健康决策工具(自动风险/预防建议,所有患者都可以使用)。在MyPeBS中,使用Mammorisk™/BCSC模型+ PRS 313或Tyrer-Cuzick (TC) + PRS 313来估计5年风险。1例伴有BC的乳腺癌一级家族史。绝对风险临界值定义为“低”(1%)、“平均”(1-1.66%)、“高”(1.66-6%)和“非常高”(≥6%),并有相应的筛查分配:4年、2年、每年或每年+ MRI。WISDOM和MyPeBS的入组人数分别为46,289名和53,143名。使用MyPeBS绝对风险截止值,WISDOM和MyPeBS的风险分布分别相似:“非常高”(1%对2%);“高”(31% vs 33%),“平均”(26% vs 29%)和低(40% vs 37%)。在两项试验中,低风险组的筛查建议差异最大:WISDOM从50岁开始每2年筛查一次,而MyPeBS从4岁开始每2年筛查一次。年龄中位数相似(54比55),但在WISDOM中,40多岁的女性比例更高(38%比23%)。WISDOM组的基线BMI更高(27.6 vs 25.3)。差异(WISDOM vs MyPeBS)包括:教育水平,76%对52%拥有大学学位;既往活检率分别为24%和14%;有一级家庭成员(24% vs 17%);绝经后妇女使用激素替代的比例是45%对17%在两项试验中,化学预防的基线使用率为1%或更低。在这两项主要试验中,除了低风险女性(每2年(WISDOM) vs每4年(MyPeBS))的筛查方案外,风险分配阈值和个性化风险组患者比例非常相似。变化提供了从不同练习模式的效果中学习的机会。从两个试验中得出的数据应该是可概括的,并有可能改变实践。引文格式:圭因迪,k . Leggat-Barr p Giorgi罗西,m·f·吉尔伯特,m .罗马j . Burrion h . De通力,s . De热空气气球l .佐丹奴d . Keatley j .德勒兹e . Gauthier s•c . Vissac-Sabatier h . Anton-Culver s Borowsky大脑,j .埃瑟曼e·齐夫a . Fiscalini d . Goodman-Gruen d . Heditsian r . Hiatt诉李,d . Moorehead a . Naiem o . Olopade h .公园,b·帕克,a . Petruse m . Scheuner l . van ' t转向,诉Arasu, m·埃克伦l . Madlensky y Shieh, n .温格j .泰斯c·卡普兰,A. Kaster, R. Lancaster, A. LaCroix, S. Delaloge, L. Esserman。智慧与mypebs:在不同国际背景下进行的个性化乳腺癌筛查试验[摘要]。摘自:《2025年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集》;2025年12月9-12日;费城(PA): AACR;临床癌症杂志2026;32(4增刊):nr PS3-01-12。
{"title":"Abstract PS3-01-12: Wisdom and mypebs: personalized breast cancer screening trials operating in distinct international contexts","authors":"K. Leggat-Barr, P. Giorgi Rossi, M. Guindy, F. Gilbert, M. Roman, J. Burrion, H. De Koning, S. de Montgolfier, L. Giordano, D. Keatley, J. Deleuze, E. Gauthier, S. Michiels, C. Vissac-Sabatier, H. Anton-Culver, S. Borowsky, S. Brain, J. Esserman, E. Ziv, A. Fiscalini, D. Goodman-Gruen, D. Heditsian, R. Hiatt, V. Lee, D. Moorehead, A. Naiem, O. Olopade, H. Park, B. Parker, A. Petruse, M. Scheuner, L. van ‘t Veer, V. Arasu, M. Eklund, L. Madlensky, Y. Shieh, N. Wenger, J. Tice, C. Kaplan, A. Kaster, R. Lancaster, A. LaCroix, S. Delaloge, L. Esserman","doi":"10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps3-01-12","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps3-01-12","url":null,"abstract":"Background WISDOM (Women Informed to Screen Depending on Measures of risk) (NCT02620852) and MyPeBS (My Personal Breast Screening) (NCT03672331) are two prominent risk-based breast cancer screening (RBS) trials based in the US and Europe &amp; Israel, respectively. Both trials aim to assess whether RBS is as safe as current screening (no increase incidence of stage&amp;gt; II/IIB breast cancers) and can aid to enhance resources on those at higher risk, while minimizing harm to those at lowest risk. WISDOM and MyPeBS were conducted independently but with a planned joint analysis. Guidelines in the US range from annual (ACR, NCCN) to biennial screening starting at age 40 (USPSTF). In contrast, screening in MyPeBS countries is population-based by invitation every 2 years in (France, Belgium, Italy, Spain, Israel) and every 3 years in the UK starting at age 50. We will compare the baseline characteristics of both cohorts. Methods Eligibility included ages 40-74 in WISDOM and 40-70 in MyPeBS and no prior breast cancer history. Both are randomized 1:1 to RBS vs. country-based standard of care screening, though in WISDOM, women could choose their arm if they declined randomization (pragmatic, preference tolerant approach). Methods of recruitment reflect systematic/screening invitation (EU) vs. opportunistic (US). In WISDOM, the 5-year risk of invasive BC is estimated using the Breast Cancer Screening Consortium (BCSC) score, which includes clinical data &amp; breast density, combined with a Polygenic Risk Score (PRS) (up to 126 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)), &amp; a panel to identify germline mutations in 9 breast cancer risk genes. Four categories were used to classify risk (lowest, average, elevated, &amp; highest), with corresponding screening assignments: age-based (mammogram (Mg) starting at 50), two-year (average), one-year moderate risk (MR), or Q6 (alternating Mg and MRI every 6 months). MR/Q6 includes breast health specialist consultation to discuss risk reduction and the Breast Health Decisions tool (automated risk/prevention recommendations, which is available to all patients). In MyPeBS, the 5-year risk is estimated using the Mammorisk™/BCSC model + PRS 313, or Tyrer-Cuzick (TC) + PRS 313 among women who have &amp;gt;1 first-degree family history of breast cancer (FDFH) with BC. Absolute risk cutoffs are defined as ‘low’ (&amp;lt;1%), ‘average’ (1–1.66%), ‘high’ (&amp;gt;1.66–6%), and ‘very high’ (≥6%) with corresponding screening assignments: next Mg at 4 years, Mg every 2 years, annually, or annually + MRI. Results WISDOM and MyPeBS enrollment was 46,289 and 53,143 women, respectively. Using the MyPeBS absolute risk cutoffs, the risk distribution for WISDOM and MyPeBS respectively were similar: ‘very high,’ (1% vs. 2%); ‘high’ (31% vs 33%), ‘average’ (26% vs 29%) &amp; ‘low’ (40% vs 37%). Between the two trials, the screening recommendations for the low-risk group were the most different: every 2 years starting at 50 in WISDOM vs","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146230761","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract PS4-04-10: Preclinical Evaluation of 64Cu-Labeled Cetuximab Immuno-PET for Detecting Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis and Assessing Therapeutic Potential in EGFR-Positive Breast Cancer 摘要PS4-04-10: 64cu标记西妥昔单抗免疫pet检测egfr阳性乳腺癌前哨淋巴结转移和评估治疗潜力的临床前评价
IF 11.5 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-20 DOI: 10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps4-04-10
T. Usui, T. Miyake, T. Watabe, K. Hiroki, K. Abe, T. Ryu, S. Yasufumi, N. Masunaga, C. Mishima, M. Tsukabe, Y. Sota, T. Yoshinami, T. Tanei, K. Shimazu
Background: Accurate detection of sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis remains a diagnostic challenge in breast cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of immuno-positron emission tomography (PET) using 64Cu-labeled cetuximab for detecting SLN metastasis and to assess its preliminary therapeutic effect in a preclinical model of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-positive breast cancer. Methods: The SLN metastasis model was established using EGFR-overexpressing MDA-MB-468 breast cancer cell line. [64Cu]Cu-PCTA-cetuximab was administered either intravenously (IV; 5.8 ± 0.9 MBq; n=12) or intradermally / subdermally (ID/SD; 4.3 ± 0.4 MBq; n=11) into the parapapillary region of the tumor-containing mammary gland. PET/computed tomography scans were performed 24 h after tracer injection, with delayed imaging at 48 h to evaluate retention and contrast. For comparison, 18F-FDG PET was also performed via IV (9.1 ± 1.4 MBq, n = 4) or ID/SD (5.4 ± 2.2 MBq, n = 3) routes in the same cohort. SLNs were identified using blue dye, and were pathologicaly evaluated for metastases. To evaluate therapeutic efficacy, additional mice received IV [64Cu]Cu-PCTA-cetuximab at 9, 18, or 37 MBq (n = 3 per group), and tumor diameters and body weight were monitored over time in comparison to untreated controls. Results: After intravenous administration of [64Cu]Cu-PCTA-cetuximab (n=12), radiotracer accumulation was detected in the primary tumor in all mice and in the axilla of eight mice (67%, SUVmax 1.24 ± 0.51), all of which were found to have SLNs with histologically confirmed metastasis. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and negative and positive predictive values for PET imaging in this group were 89%, 100%, 92%, 75%, and 100%, respectively. In the ID/SD group , all 11 mice showed high tracer accumulation in both the primary tumor and axillary nodes (SUVmax 4.28 ± 1.19); however, only six mice (55%, SUVmax 5.01 ± 1.12) had histologically confirmed SLN metastasis. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive predictive values for this route were 100%, 0%, 55% and 55%, respectively. SLN metastasis was not detectable by 18F-FDG PET regardless of the administration route. Regarding therapeutic evaluation, all IV-treated groups showed tumor growth suppression compared to controls. The 37 MBq group exhibited the most pronounced tumor reduction but also showed a marked decrease in body weight, indicating potential systemic toxicity at higher doses. Conclusions: Immuno-PET with IV-administered [64Cu]Cu-PCTA-cetuximab demonstrated high precision for diagnosis of SLN metastasis and showed promising therapeutic efficacy in an EGFR-positive breast cancer model. While ID/SD administration showed lower diagnostic specificity, its strong accumulation in SLNs indicates potential utility for localized therapy. These findings support further exploration of 64Cu-labeled cetuximab for theranostic applications in breast cancer. Citation Format: T. Usui, T. Miya
背景:准确检测前哨淋巴结(SLN)转移仍然是乳腺癌诊断的挑战。本研究旨在评估使用64cu标记的西妥昔单抗免疫正电子发射断层扫描(PET)检测SLN转移的可行性,并评估其在表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)阳性乳腺癌临床前模型中的初步治疗效果。方法:采用过表达egfr的MDA-MB-468乳腺癌细胞株建立SLN转移模型。[64Cu]将cu - pcta -西妥昔单抗静脉注射(IV; 5.8±0.9 MBq; n=12)或皮内/皮下注射(ID/SD; 4.3±0.4 MBq; n=11)至含瘤乳腺乳头旁区。示踪剂注射后24小时进行PET/计算机断层扫描,48小时延迟成像以评估保留和造影剂。为了比较,在同一队列中,18F-FDG PET也通过IV(9.1±1.4 MBq, n = 4)或ID/SD(5.4±2.2 MBq, n = 3)途径进行。使用蓝色染料识别sln,并对转移进行病理评估。为了评估治疗效果,额外的小鼠以9、18或37 MBq的剂量接受IV [64Cu] cu - pcta -西妥昔单抗治疗(每组n = 3),并与未治疗的对照组相比,长期监测肿瘤直径和体重。结果:静脉给药[64Cu] cu - pcta -西妥昔单抗(n=12)后,所有小鼠原发肿瘤和8只小鼠腋窝(67%,SUVmax 1.24±0.51)均检测到放射性示踪剂积累,均发现组织学证实转移的sln。本组PET成像的敏感性、特异性、准确性、阴性预测值和阳性预测值分别为89%、100%、92%、75%和100%。在ID/SD组,所有11只小鼠在原发肿瘤和腋窝淋巴结均显示高示踪剂积累(SUVmax 4.28±1.19);然而,只有6只小鼠(55%,SUVmax 5.01±1.12)组织学证实有SLN转移。该方法的敏感性、特异性、准确性和阳性预测值分别为100%、0%、55%和55%。无论给药途径如何,18F-FDG PET均未检测到SLN转移。关于治疗评价,与对照组相比,所有iv治疗组均显示肿瘤生长抑制。37 MBq组表现出最明显的肿瘤减少,但也表现出体重的显著下降,表明在高剂量下潜在的全身毒性。结论:免疫pet联合iv给药[64Cu] cu - pcta -西妥昔单抗对SLN转移的诊断精度较高,在egfr阳性乳腺癌模型中具有良好的治疗效果。虽然ID/SD给药的诊断特异性较低,但其在sln中的强烈积累表明其在局部治疗中的潜在效用。这些发现支持进一步探索64cu标记的西妥昔单抗在乳腺癌治疗中的应用。引用格式:T.臼井,T.三宅,T.渡部,K. Hiroki, K. Abe, T. Ryu, S. Yasufumi, N. Masunaga, C. Mishima, M. Tsukabe, Y. Sota, T. Yoshinami, T. Tanei, K. Shimazu64cu标记西妥昔单抗免疫pet检测前哨淋巴结转移及评估egfr阳性乳腺癌治疗潜力的临床前评价[摘要]。摘自:《2025年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集》;2025年12月9-12日;费城(PA): AACR;临床癌症杂志2026;32(4增刊):nr PS4-04-10。
{"title":"Abstract PS4-04-10: Preclinical Evaluation of 64Cu-Labeled Cetuximab Immuno-PET for Detecting Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis and Assessing Therapeutic Potential in EGFR-Positive Breast Cancer","authors":"T. Usui, T. Miyake, T. Watabe, K. Hiroki, K. Abe, T. Ryu, S. Yasufumi, N. Masunaga, C. Mishima, M. Tsukabe, Y. Sota, T. Yoshinami, T. Tanei, K. Shimazu","doi":"10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps4-04-10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps4-04-10","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Accurate detection of sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis remains a diagnostic challenge in breast cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of immuno-positron emission tomography (PET) using 64Cu-labeled cetuximab for detecting SLN metastasis and to assess its preliminary therapeutic effect in a preclinical model of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-positive breast cancer. Methods: The SLN metastasis model was established using EGFR-overexpressing MDA-MB-468 breast cancer cell line. [64Cu]Cu-PCTA-cetuximab was administered either intravenously (IV; 5.8 ± 0.9 MBq; n=12) or intradermally / subdermally (ID/SD; 4.3 ± 0.4 MBq; n=11) into the parapapillary region of the tumor-containing mammary gland. PET/computed tomography scans were performed 24 h after tracer injection, with delayed imaging at 48 h to evaluate retention and contrast. For comparison, 18F-FDG PET was also performed via IV (9.1 ± 1.4 MBq, n = 4) or ID/SD (5.4 ± 2.2 MBq, n = 3) routes in the same cohort. SLNs were identified using blue dye, and were pathologicaly evaluated for metastases. To evaluate therapeutic efficacy, additional mice received IV [64Cu]Cu-PCTA-cetuximab at 9, 18, or 37 MBq (n = 3 per group), and tumor diameters and body weight were monitored over time in comparison to untreated controls. Results: After intravenous administration of [64Cu]Cu-PCTA-cetuximab (n=12), radiotracer accumulation was detected in the primary tumor in all mice and in the axilla of eight mice (67%, SUVmax 1.24 ± 0.51), all of which were found to have SLNs with histologically confirmed metastasis. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and negative and positive predictive values for PET imaging in this group were 89%, 100%, 92%, 75%, and 100%, respectively. In the ID/SD group , all 11 mice showed high tracer accumulation in both the primary tumor and axillary nodes (SUVmax 4.28 ± 1.19); however, only six mice (55%, SUVmax 5.01 ± 1.12) had histologically confirmed SLN metastasis. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive predictive values for this route were 100%, 0%, 55% and 55%, respectively. SLN metastasis was not detectable by 18F-FDG PET regardless of the administration route. Regarding therapeutic evaluation, all IV-treated groups showed tumor growth suppression compared to controls. The 37 MBq group exhibited the most pronounced tumor reduction but also showed a marked decrease in body weight, indicating potential systemic toxicity at higher doses. Conclusions: Immuno-PET with IV-administered [64Cu]Cu-PCTA-cetuximab demonstrated high precision for diagnosis of SLN metastasis and showed promising therapeutic efficacy in an EGFR-positive breast cancer model. While ID/SD administration showed lower diagnostic specificity, its strong accumulation in SLNs indicates potential utility for localized therapy. These findings support further exploration of 64Cu-labeled cetuximab for theranostic applications in breast cancer. Citation Format: T. Usui, T. Miya","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":"174 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146230767","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Apalutamide + Abiraterone acetate plus Prednisone (AAP) + Leuprolide with Stereotactic, Ultra-Hypofractionated Radiation (AASUR) in Very High Risk Prostate Cancer: A Single Arm, Phase 2 Study 阿帕鲁胺+醋酸阿比aterone +强的松(AAP) + Leuprolide伴立体定向超低分割放射(AASUR)治疗高危前列腺癌:单组2期研究
IF 11.5 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-19 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-25-3746
Sean M. McBride, Daniel E. Spratt, Marisa Kollmeier, Wassim Abida, Han Xiao, Susan F. Slovin, Channing J. Paller, Curtiland Deville, Robert B. Den, Jason =. Hearn, Victoria Catharine, Howard Scher, Michael Zelefsky, Dana Rathkopf
Purpose: This study investigates a short-course, intensified regimen combining apalutamide, abiraterone acetate and prednisone (AAP), and stereotactic body radiotherapy to reduce treatment burden and improve disease control in a very high-risk population (VHR) inadequately represented in prior trials. Methods: This multi-institutional, single-arm phase 2 trial enrolled patients with VHR localized prostate cancer, defined per NCCN as histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma with ≥2 high-risk features: Gleason 8-10, PSA ≥20, clinical/radiographic ≥T3, or &gt;4 cores of Gleason 8 disease. Patients received 6 months of apalutamide, abiraterone acetate and leuprolide plus prostate/seminal vesicle-directed ultra-fractionated SBRT. The primary endpoint was 3-year biochemical recurrence (BCR) rate by Phoenix criteria, with a prespecified superiority threshold of &lt;10%. Secondary endpoints included PSA ≥ 0.2, metastasis-free survival (MFS), and time to testosterone recovery &gt;150 ng/dL. Results: Between 08/2016 to 12/2022, 63 patients were treated. At 3 years, the Phoenix-defined BCR rate was 19.0%. Biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS) was 84.2% (95 CI, 75.6-93.7) with median follow-up of 41 months (34-43). Three-year MFS was 93.6% (95% CI, 87.8%-99.8%), with no deaths observed. Median time to testosterone recovery &gt;150 ng/dL was 6 months (range, 3-24). No new safety signals emerged, and the only significant quality-of-life decline was in the EPIC sexual sub-domain at 12 months. Conclusion: Treatment intensification with apalutamide, AAP, ADT and SBRT well-tolerated with limited impact on quality of life. While BCR rates exceed the superiority threshold, outcomes aligned with historical benchmarks, supporting further evaluation of the regimen in prospective trials.
目的:本研究探讨了阿帕鲁胺、醋酸阿比特龙和强的松(AAP)联合立体定向体放疗的短期强化方案,以减轻既往试验中未充分代表的高危人群(VHR)的治疗负担并改善疾病控制。方法:这项多机构、单臂2期试验纳入了VHR局限性前列腺癌患者,根据NCCN定义,组织学证实的腺癌具有≥2个高危特征:Gleason 8-10, PSA≥20,临床/影像学≥T3,或&;gt;4例Gleason 8型病变。患者接受了6个月的阿帕鲁胺、醋酸阿比特龙和莱丙利加前列腺/精囊定向超分离SBRT治疗。主要终点是3年生化复发率(BCR)按照凤凰标准,预先设定的优势阈值为10%。次要终点包括PSA≥0.2、无转移生存期(MFS)和睾丸激素恢复时间;150毫微克/分升。结果:2016年8月至2022年12月,共治疗63例患者。3年时,phoenix定义的BCR率为19.0%。生化无复发生存率(bRFS)为84.2% (95 CI, 75.6-93.7),中位随访41个月(34-43)。3年MFS为93.6% (95% CI, 87.8%-99.8%),未观察到死亡。睾丸激素恢复的中位时间&;gt;150 ng/dL为6个月(范围3-24)。没有新的安全信号出现,唯一显著的生活质量下降是在12个月时的EPIC性亚域。结论:阿帕鲁胺、AAP、ADT和SBRT强化治疗耐受性良好,对生活质量影响有限。虽然BCR率超过了优势阈值,但结果与历史基准一致,支持在前瞻性试验中进一步评估该方案。
{"title":"Apalutamide + Abiraterone acetate plus Prednisone (AAP) + Leuprolide with Stereotactic, Ultra-Hypofractionated Radiation (AASUR) in Very High Risk Prostate Cancer: A Single Arm, Phase 2 Study","authors":"Sean M. McBride, Daniel E. Spratt, Marisa Kollmeier, Wassim Abida, Han Xiao, Susan F. Slovin, Channing J. Paller, Curtiland Deville, Robert B. Den, Jason =. Hearn, Victoria Catharine, Howard Scher, Michael Zelefsky, Dana Rathkopf","doi":"10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-25-3746","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-25-3746","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study investigates a short-course, intensified regimen combining apalutamide, abiraterone acetate and prednisone (AAP), and stereotactic body radiotherapy to reduce treatment burden and improve disease control in a very high-risk population (VHR) inadequately represented in prior trials. Methods: This multi-institutional, single-arm phase 2 trial enrolled patients with VHR localized prostate cancer, defined per NCCN as histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma with ≥2 high-risk features: Gleason 8-10, PSA ≥20, clinical/radiographic ≥T3, or &amp;gt;4 cores of Gleason 8 disease. Patients received 6 months of apalutamide, abiraterone acetate and leuprolide plus prostate/seminal vesicle-directed ultra-fractionated SBRT. The primary endpoint was 3-year biochemical recurrence (BCR) rate by Phoenix criteria, with a prespecified superiority threshold of &amp;lt;10%. Secondary endpoints included PSA ≥ 0.2, metastasis-free survival (MFS), and time to testosterone recovery &amp;gt;150 ng/dL. Results: Between 08/2016 to 12/2022, 63 patients were treated. At 3 years, the Phoenix-defined BCR rate was 19.0%. Biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS) was 84.2% (95 CI, 75.6-93.7) with median follow-up of 41 months (34-43). Three-year MFS was 93.6% (95% CI, 87.8%-99.8%), with no deaths observed. Median time to testosterone recovery &amp;gt;150 ng/dL was 6 months (range, 3-24). No new safety signals emerged, and the only significant quality-of-life decline was in the EPIC sexual sub-domain at 12 months. Conclusion: Treatment intensification with apalutamide, AAP, ADT and SBRT well-tolerated with limited impact on quality of life. While BCR rates exceed the superiority threshold, outcomes aligned with historical benchmarks, supporting further evaluation of the regimen in prospective trials.","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146222825","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Shaping the future of HER2-directed therapy in biliary tract cancer 塑造胆道肿瘤her2定向治疗的未来
IF 11.5 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-19 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-25-4464
Orla M. Fitzpatrick, James J. Harding
This commentary on a retrospective study of patients with HER2 positive biliary tract cancer highlights the importance of reflex and validated HER2 testing criteria; the discordance of next generation sequencing and HER2 immunohistochemistry; the potential prognostic and predictive role of HER2; and the necessity to define HER2 therapy resistance mechanisms.
这篇关于HER2阳性胆道癌患者回顾性研究的评论强调了反射和验证HER2检测标准的重要性;下一代测序结果与HER2免疫组化结果不一致;HER2的潜在预后和预测作用;以及明确HER2治疗耐药机制的必要性。
{"title":"Shaping the future of HER2-directed therapy in biliary tract cancer","authors":"Orla M. Fitzpatrick, James J. Harding","doi":"10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-25-4464","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-25-4464","url":null,"abstract":"This commentary on a retrospective study of patients with HER2 positive biliary tract cancer highlights the importance of reflex and validated HER2 testing criteria; the discordance of next generation sequencing and HER2 immunohistochemistry; the potential prognostic and predictive role of HER2; and the necessity to define HER2 therapy resistance mechanisms.","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146222874","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Contemporary Management of Radiation Necrosis: Insights and Avenues 当代放射性坏死的管理:见解和途径
IF 11.5 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-18 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-25-2381
Michelle M. Williams, Aden P. Haskell-Mendoza, Ethan A. Massat, Bryan T. Mott, Eleanor C. Smith, Tanner J. Zachem, Franziska Loebel, Christina Kehl. Cramer, Michael D. Chan, Adrian W. Laxton, Jaclyn J. White, C. Rory Goodwin, Patrick J. Codd, Peter E. Fecci
Radiation necrosis (RN) remains a challenging complication of upfront radiation therapy for both brain metastases and primary tumors. Despite development of an array of advanced imaging modalities to differentiate RN and true tumor progression, tissue diagnosis remains the gold standard. Synergizing artificial intelligence to assist with imaging and intraoperative pathologic diagnosis may represent a fruitful future direction. Similarly, laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is an attractive alternative for RN management when the costs and complications of chronic steroid or bevacizumab are considered. Current evidence suggests an angio-inflammatory cascade is responsible for RN development; tissue-based studies and preclinical modeling are needed to reveal targetable causal mechanisms that may support clinical risk stratification and treatment.
放射性坏死(RN)仍然是脑转移瘤和原发性肿瘤术前放疗的一个具有挑战性的并发症。尽管发展了一系列先进的成像方式来区分RN和真正的肿瘤进展,组织诊断仍然是金标准。协同人工智能辅助成像和术中病理诊断可能是一个富有成效的未来方向。同样,当考虑到慢性类固醇或贝伐单抗的成本和并发症时,激光间质热疗法(LITT)是RN管理的一个有吸引力的替代方案。目前的证据表明,血管炎症级联是RN发展的原因;需要基于组织的研究和临床前建模来揭示可能支持临床风险分层和治疗的目标因果机制。
{"title":"Contemporary Management of Radiation Necrosis: Insights and Avenues","authors":"Michelle M. Williams, Aden P. Haskell-Mendoza, Ethan A. Massat, Bryan T. Mott, Eleanor C. Smith, Tanner J. Zachem, Franziska Loebel, Christina Kehl. Cramer, Michael D. Chan, Adrian W. Laxton, Jaclyn J. White, C. Rory Goodwin, Patrick J. Codd, Peter E. Fecci","doi":"10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-25-2381","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-25-2381","url":null,"abstract":"Radiation necrosis (RN) remains a challenging complication of upfront radiation therapy for both brain metastases and primary tumors. Despite development of an array of advanced imaging modalities to differentiate RN and true tumor progression, tissue diagnosis remains the gold standard. Synergizing artificial intelligence to assist with imaging and intraoperative pathologic diagnosis may represent a fruitful future direction. Similarly, laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is an attractive alternative for RN management when the costs and complications of chronic steroid or bevacizumab are considered. Current evidence suggests an angio-inflammatory cascade is responsible for RN development; tissue-based studies and preclinical modeling are needed to reveal targetable causal mechanisms that may support clinical risk stratification and treatment.","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":"95 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146215822","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Clinical Cancer Research
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1