Pub Date : 2026-02-17DOI: 10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps2-02-07
A. Rodríguez-Hernández, J. Quintanilla, R. Graf, A. Schrock, A. Gasco, B. Bychkovsky, R. Kitadai, S. Morganti, D. Abravanel, S. Tolaney, J. Garber, R. Jeselsohn, N. Lin, F. Lynce
Background: PARPi are used to treat MBC, particularly in pts with genomic alterations (GA) in BRCA1/2 by targeting homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). This study explored clinical and genomic factors associated with PARPi sensitivity in a real-world MBC cohort. Methods: This retrospective study included 290 pts with MBC who had genomic testing via FoundationOne/FoundationOne CDx tissue comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) and prior to treatment with a PARPi. Clinical data were sourced from the US-wide de-identified Flatiron Health-Foundation Medicine clinic genomic database, including ∼800 sites across ∼280 US cancer clinics (Jan 2011-Dec 2024). HRD alterations (alts) were defined as mutations, homozygous copy loss, or structural rearrangements in any of the following genes: BRCA1/2, ATM, ATR, ATRX, BAP1, BARD1, BRIP1, CHEK1/2, CDK12, FANCA, FANCL, MRE11, RAD51B/C/D, RAD54L or PALB2. HRD signature (HRDsig) status, which is offered as a laboratory professional service, was calculated using genome-wide copy number features, with scores from 0 to 1 and a predefined cutoff of 0.7 to call HRDsig (+). BRCA1/2 germline status was inferred using a validated somatic-germline-zygosity algorithm. Time to next treatment or death (TTNT) on PARPi was analyzed using Cox models adjusted for clinical variables. Results: Among 290 pts, most were female (96.6%, n=280), with a median age of 57 years at PARPi initiation. Of these, 186 (64.1%) had hormone receptor-positive (HR+) disease and 104 (35.9%) had HR- disease. In total, 21 had HER2+ tumors (12 HR+, 9 HR-). PARPi was given +/- endocrine therapy in 236 pts (81.4%) and in combination with other therapies in 54 (18.6%). PARPi was given in 1L (14.1%), 2L (26.9%), 3L (19.3%), and ≥4L (39.7%). Tumors from 199 patients (59.2%) were HRDsig (+): 120 (60.3%) HR+ and 79 (39.7%) HR−. Overall, 237 pts (81.7%) harbored ≥1GA (mutation, homozygous copy loss, or rearrangement) in BRCA1 (n=90), BRCA2 (n=130), or PALB2 (n=19). Nineteen pts had BRCAloss (8 in BRCA1 and 11 in BRCA2). In pre-PARPi CGP samples, HR+ tumors most frequently harbored BRCA2 (52.7%), TP53 (32.8%), BRCA1 (21.0%), while HR- tumors showed higher rates of TP53 (85.6%), BRCA1 (49.0%), BRCA2 (30.8%), and PALB2 (4.8%). Among pts with HR+ disease, those with a BRCAloss vs other BRCA GA detected prior to PARPi exposure had more favorable TTNT (median 15.2 vs. 8.5 months HR:0.40; p=0.012). No differences in TTNT were observed by BRCA1/2 mutation origin (germline (g) vs somatic (s)), type (truncating vs missense), or location (Table 1). Conclusions: Response to PARPi varied across different GA. Among pts with HR+ MBC, those with BRCAloss appeared to derive the greatest benefit. These findings highlight the potential utility of CGP in guiding PARPi treatment decisions. Citation Format: A. Rodríguez-Hernández, J. Quintanilla, R. Graf, A. Schrock, A. Gasco, B. Bychkovsky, R. Kitadai, S. Morganti, D. Abravanel, S. Tolaney, J. Garber, R. Jeselsohn, N. Lin, F. Lyn
背景:PARPi被用于治疗MBC,特别是通过靶向同源重组缺陷(HRD)治疗BRCA1/2基因组改变(GA)的患者。本研究探讨了现实世界MBC队列中与PARPi敏感性相关的临床和基因组因素。方法:这项回顾性研究包括290名MBC患者,他们在接受PARPi治疗之前通过FoundationOne/FoundationOne CDx组织综合基因组分析(CGP)进行了基因组检测。临床数据来自美国范围内去鉴定的Flatiron健康基础医学临床基因组数据库,包括约280个美国癌症诊所的约800个站点(2011年1月至2024年12月)。HRD改变(alts)被定义为以下任何基因的突变、纯合拷贝丢失或结构重排:BRCA1/2、ATM、ATR、ATRX、BAP1、BARD1、BRIP1、CHEK1/2、CDK12、FANCA、FANCL、MRE11、RAD51B/C/D、RAD54L或PALB2。作为实验室专业服务提供的HRD签名(HRDsig)状态是使用全基因组拷贝数特征计算的,分数从0到1,预定义的截止值为0.7,称为HRDsig(+)。BRCA1/2生殖系状态通过验证的体细胞-生殖系合子算法推断。使用经临床变量调整的Cox模型分析PARPi的下一次治疗或死亡时间(TTNT)。结果:290名患者中,大多数为女性(96.6%,n=280), PARPi开始时的中位年龄为57岁。其中,激素受体阳性(HR+) 186例(64.1%),HR-疾病104例(35.9%)。HER2+肿瘤21例(HR+ 12例,HR- 9例)。PARPi患者中236例(81.4%)接受+/-内分泌治疗,54例(18.6%)联合其他治疗。1L(14.1%)、2L(26.9%)、3L(19.3%)和≥4L(39.7%)患者给予PARPi治疗。199例(59.2%)患者HRDsig为+,120例(60.3%)为HR+, 79例(39.7%)为HR−。总体而言,237名患者(81.7%)在BRCA1 (n=90)、BRCA2 (n=130)或PALB2 (n=19)中携带≥1GA(突变、纯合拷贝丢失或重排)。19例患者有brcalloss(8例BRCA1, 11例BRCA2)。在parpi前的CGP样本中,HR+肿瘤最常携带BRCA2(52.7%)、TP53(32.8%)、BRCA1(21.0%),而HR-肿瘤的TP53(85.6%)、BRCA1(49.0%)、BRCA2(30.8%)和PALB2(4.8%)的比例更高。在HR+疾病的患者中,与PARPi暴露前检测到的其他BRCA GA相比,brcalloss患者有更有利的TTNT(中位15.2 vs 8.5个月HR:0.40; p=0.012)。BRCA1/2突变起源(种系(g) vs体细胞(s))、类型(截断vs错义)或位置(表1)均未观察到TTNT的差异。结论:不同GA对PARPi的反应不同。在HR+ MBC患者中,brcalloss患者似乎获得了最大的益处。这些发现强调了CGP在指导PARPi治疗决策方面的潜在效用。引文格式:A. Rodríguez-Hernández, J. Quintanilla, R. Graf, A. Schrock, A. Gasco, B. Bychkovsky, R. Kitadai, S. Morganti, D. Abravanel, S. Tolaney, J. Garber, R. Jeselsohn, N. Lin, F. Lynce。BRCA纯合子拷贝丢失对PARP抑制剂(PARPi)治疗转移性乳腺癌(MBC)患者临床结局的影响[摘要]。摘自:《2025年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集》;2025年12月9-12日;费城(PA): AACR;临床癌症杂志2026;32(4增刊):nr PS2-02-07。
{"title":"Abstract PS2-02-07: Impact of BRCA homozygous copy loss on clinical outcomes of patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) treated with PARP inhibitors (PARPi)","authors":"A. Rodríguez-Hernández, J. Quintanilla, R. Graf, A. Schrock, A. Gasco, B. Bychkovsky, R. Kitadai, S. Morganti, D. Abravanel, S. Tolaney, J. Garber, R. Jeselsohn, N. Lin, F. Lynce","doi":"10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps2-02-07","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps2-02-07","url":null,"abstract":"Background: PARPi are used to treat MBC, particularly in pts with genomic alterations (GA) in BRCA1/2 by targeting homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). This study explored clinical and genomic factors associated with PARPi sensitivity in a real-world MBC cohort. Methods: This retrospective study included 290 pts with MBC who had genomic testing via FoundationOne/FoundationOne CDx tissue comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) and prior to treatment with a PARPi. Clinical data were sourced from the US-wide de-identified Flatiron Health-Foundation Medicine clinic genomic database, including ∼800 sites across ∼280 US cancer clinics (Jan 2011-Dec 2024). HRD alterations (alts) were defined as mutations, homozygous copy loss, or structural rearrangements in any of the following genes: BRCA1/2, ATM, ATR, ATRX, BAP1, BARD1, BRIP1, CHEK1/2, CDK12, FANCA, FANCL, MRE11, RAD51B/C/D, RAD54L or PALB2. HRD signature (HRDsig) status, which is offered as a laboratory professional service, was calculated using genome-wide copy number features, with scores from 0 to 1 and a predefined cutoff of 0.7 to call HRDsig (+). BRCA1/2 germline status was inferred using a validated somatic-germline-zygosity algorithm. Time to next treatment or death (TTNT) on PARPi was analyzed using Cox models adjusted for clinical variables. Results: Among 290 pts, most were female (96.6%, n=280), with a median age of 57 years at PARPi initiation. Of these, 186 (64.1%) had hormone receptor-positive (HR+) disease and 104 (35.9%) had HR- disease. In total, 21 had HER2+ tumors (12 HR+, 9 HR-). PARPi was given +/- endocrine therapy in 236 pts (81.4%) and in combination with other therapies in 54 (18.6%). PARPi was given in 1L (14.1%), 2L (26.9%), 3L (19.3%), and ≥4L (39.7%). Tumors from 199 patients (59.2%) were HRDsig (+): 120 (60.3%) HR+ and 79 (39.7%) HR−. Overall, 237 pts (81.7%) harbored ≥1GA (mutation, homozygous copy loss, or rearrangement) in BRCA1 (n=90), BRCA2 (n=130), or PALB2 (n=19). Nineteen pts had BRCAloss (8 in BRCA1 and 11 in BRCA2). In pre-PARPi CGP samples, HR+ tumors most frequently harbored BRCA2 (52.7%), TP53 (32.8%), BRCA1 (21.0%), while HR- tumors showed higher rates of TP53 (85.6%), BRCA1 (49.0%), BRCA2 (30.8%), and PALB2 (4.8%). Among pts with HR+ disease, those with a BRCAloss vs other BRCA GA detected prior to PARPi exposure had more favorable TTNT (median 15.2 vs. 8.5 months HR:0.40; p=0.012). No differences in TTNT were observed by BRCA1/2 mutation origin (germline (g) vs somatic (s)), type (truncating vs missense), or location (Table 1). Conclusions: Response to PARPi varied across different GA. Among pts with HR+ MBC, those with BRCAloss appeared to derive the greatest benefit. These findings highlight the potential utility of CGP in guiding PARPi treatment decisions. Citation Format: A. Rodríguez-Hernández, J. Quintanilla, R. Graf, A. Schrock, A. Gasco, B. Bychkovsky, R. Kitadai, S. Morganti, D. Abravanel, S. Tolaney, J. Garber, R. Jeselsohn, N. Lin, F. Lyn","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":"326 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146205195","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-17DOI: 10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps3-10-30
C. Bergstrom, I. Luo, E. Kotler, M. Satoyoshi, S. Philip, C. Curtis, A. Kurian, S. Han, J. Caswell-Jin
Introduction: Immune activation and lymphocyte infiltration into the tumor microenvironment are known to predict treatment response in HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer. Our work has shown that dynamic changes in peripheral absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) following initial neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) are also associated with a higher likelihood of achieving pathologic complete response (pCR). In this study, we aimed to develop and validate a predictive model for pCR based on clinically obtained pre-treatment ALC and ALC following a single dose of NAT, with the goal of creating a tool for early response prediction in HER2+ breast cancer. Methods: We assembled a retrospective discovery cohort of patients with HER2+ breast cancer treated with trastuzumab-based NAT from the Oncoshare database, which integrates electronic medical records and California Cancer Registry data from patients diagnosed between 2000 and 2020 at Stanford University. Our non-overlapping validation cohort consisted of patients with HER2+ breast cancer who underwent NAT on clinical trials of HER2-targeted therapy and/or who were enrolled in prospective institutional tissue collection studies. In the discovery cohort, we constructed a multivariable logistic regression model to identify predictors of pCR, including baseline ALC, early ALC change, days between baseline and on-treatment ALC draws, age at diagnosis, estrogen receptor (ER) status, stage, grade, and self-reported race/ethnicity. Early ALC change was defined as 1 minus the ratio of cycle 1 ALC to baseline ALC. To develop an ALC-based risk grouping strategy, we used logistic regression to create a composite risk score from baseline ALC and early ALC change, followed by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. We then applied grid search optimization to test combinations of cutoff points across the 10th to 90th percentiles of the risk score distribution and identified the pair of cutoffs that maximized area under the curve (AUC) when patients were stratified into three risk categories. Model performance was evaluated using AUC analysis in both the discovery and validation cohorts. Results: In the discovery cohort (n = 154), higher baseline ALC and greater early ALC decline were independently associated with increased odds of pCR. The composite ALC risk score, using baseline ALC and early ALC change, stratified patients into three groups: low (25% of patients, n = 39), intermediate (45%, n = 69), and high (30%, n = 46) probability of pCR. Observed pCR rates in these groups were 15%, 51%, and 76%, respectively. When this ALC-based risk grouping was integrated with the other covariates (including time interval between ALC draws, age, ER status, clinical stage, tumor grade, and race/ethnicity), the full multivariable model demonstrated strong predictive performance with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.81 (95% CI 0.74-0.88). In the separate validation cohort (n = 83), the composite ALC risk score stratified patient
导论:已知免疫激活和淋巴细胞浸润到肿瘤微环境中可以预测HER2阳性(HER2+)乳腺癌的治疗反应。我们的研究表明,初始新辅助治疗(NAT)后外周血绝对淋巴细胞计数(ALC)的动态变化也与更高的实现病理完全缓解(pCR)的可能性相关。在本研究中,我们旨在开发并验证基于临床获得的治疗前ALC和单剂量NAT后ALC的pCR预测模型,目的是创建HER2+乳腺癌早期反应预测工具。方法:我们收集了来自Oncoshare数据库的HER2+乳腺癌患者的回顾性发现队列,这些患者接受基于曲妥珠单抗的NAT治疗,该数据库整合了2000年至2020年在斯坦福大学诊断的患者的电子医疗记录和加州癌症登记处数据。我们的非重叠验证队列由HER2+乳腺癌患者组成,这些患者在HER2靶向治疗的临床试验中接受了NAT治疗和/或参加了前瞻性机构组织收集研究。在发现队列中,我们构建了一个多变量logistic回归模型来确定pCR的预测因子,包括基线ALC、早期ALC变化、基线和治疗时ALC检测之间的天数、诊断时年龄、雌激素受体(ER)状态、分期、分级和自我报告的种族/民族。早期ALC变化定义为1减去第1周期ALC与基线ALC的比值。为了开发基于ALC的风险分组策略,我们使用逻辑回归从基线ALC和早期ALC变化创建复合风险评分,然后进行受试者工作特征曲线分析。然后,我们应用网格搜索优化来测试风险评分分布的第10至第90百分位数的截断点组合,并确定当患者分为三种风险类别时,曲线下面积(AUC)最大的截断点对。在发现和验证队列中使用AUC分析评估模型性能。结果:在发现队列(n = 154)中,较高的基线ALC和较大的早期ALC下降与pCR的几率增加独立相关。采用基线ALC和早期ALC变化的综合ALC风险评分将患者分为三组:低(25%的患者,n = 39)、中(45%,n = 69)和高(30%,n = 46) pCR概率。观察到各组pCR率分别为15%、51%和76%。当这个基于ALC的风险分组与其他协变量(包括ALC发作之间的时间间隔、年龄、ER状态、临床分期、肿瘤分级和种族/民族)整合时,完整的多变量模型显示出很强的预测性能,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.81 (95% CI 0.74-0.88)。在单独的验证队列(n = 83)中,综合ALC风险评分将患者分为低概率pCR组(30%的患者,n=25)、中概率pCR组(48%的患者,n=40)和高概率pCR组(22%的患者,n=18),观察到pCR率分别为12%、63%和78%。该模型在验证队列中表现出相似的判别能力,AUC为0.81(0.71-0.90)。结论:在没有其他协变量的情况下,早期ALC动态可以根据NAT后实现pCR的可能性有效地对HER2+乳腺癌患者进行分层。我们利用常规收集的实验室值开发并验证了一个临床模型,该模型在发现和验证队列中都具有很强的预测性能。这种基于alc的工具为早期反应预测提供了一种具有成本效益和可扩展的替代方案,有可能实时为治疗适应策略提供信息。引用格式:C. Bergstrom, I. Luo, E. Kotler, M. Satoyoshi, S. Philip, C. Curtis, A. Kurian, S. Han, J. Caswell-Jin。利用早期外周血绝对淋巴细胞动力学预测HER2+乳腺癌病理完全缓解的临床模型[摘要]。摘自:《2025年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集》;2025年12月9-12日;费城(PA): AACR;临床癌症杂志2026;32(4增补):nr PS3-10-30。
{"title":"Abstract PS3-10-30: A clinical model to predict pathologic complete response using early peripheral absolute lymphocyte dynamics in HER2+ breast cancer","authors":"C. Bergstrom, I. Luo, E. Kotler, M. Satoyoshi, S. Philip, C. Curtis, A. Kurian, S. Han, J. Caswell-Jin","doi":"10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps3-10-30","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps3-10-30","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Immune activation and lymphocyte infiltration into the tumor microenvironment are known to predict treatment response in HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer. Our work has shown that dynamic changes in peripheral absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) following initial neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) are also associated with a higher likelihood of achieving pathologic complete response (pCR). In this study, we aimed to develop and validate a predictive model for pCR based on clinically obtained pre-treatment ALC and ALC following a single dose of NAT, with the goal of creating a tool for early response prediction in HER2+ breast cancer. Methods: We assembled a retrospective discovery cohort of patients with HER2+ breast cancer treated with trastuzumab-based NAT from the Oncoshare database, which integrates electronic medical records and California Cancer Registry data from patients diagnosed between 2000 and 2020 at Stanford University. Our non-overlapping validation cohort consisted of patients with HER2+ breast cancer who underwent NAT on clinical trials of HER2-targeted therapy and/or who were enrolled in prospective institutional tissue collection studies. In the discovery cohort, we constructed a multivariable logistic regression model to identify predictors of pCR, including baseline ALC, early ALC change, days between baseline and on-treatment ALC draws, age at diagnosis, estrogen receptor (ER) status, stage, grade, and self-reported race/ethnicity. Early ALC change was defined as 1 minus the ratio of cycle 1 ALC to baseline ALC. To develop an ALC-based risk grouping strategy, we used logistic regression to create a composite risk score from baseline ALC and early ALC change, followed by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. We then applied grid search optimization to test combinations of cutoff points across the 10th to 90th percentiles of the risk score distribution and identified the pair of cutoffs that maximized area under the curve (AUC) when patients were stratified into three risk categories. Model performance was evaluated using AUC analysis in both the discovery and validation cohorts. Results: In the discovery cohort (n = 154), higher baseline ALC and greater early ALC decline were independently associated with increased odds of pCR. The composite ALC risk score, using baseline ALC and early ALC change, stratified patients into three groups: low (25% of patients, n = 39), intermediate (45%, n = 69), and high (30%, n = 46) probability of pCR. Observed pCR rates in these groups were 15%, 51%, and 76%, respectively. When this ALC-based risk grouping was integrated with the other covariates (including time interval between ALC draws, age, ER status, clinical stage, tumor grade, and race/ethnicity), the full multivariable model demonstrated strong predictive performance with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.81 (95% CI 0.74-0.88). In the separate validation cohort (n = 83), the composite ALC risk score stratified patient","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":"230 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146205250","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-17DOI: 10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps2-06-30
T. Taji, Y. Uemura, Y. Kimura, N. Maeda, A. Ito, H. Seki, D. Takabatake, M. Harao, S. Nakamoto, R. Matsunuma, C. Koganezawa, T. Iwamoto, H. Mukai, Y. Kikawa
Background In patients (pts) with HER2-negative, high-risk early breast cancer (BC), adjuvant (adj) olaparib (OLA) significantly improves invasive disease-free survival and overall survival in those carrying germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 (gBRCA) pathogenic variants (PVs) 1). To optimize clinical outcomes, timely gBRCA testing as a companion diagnostic is essential. However, the real-world uptake of gBRCA testing in this population remains unclear. Methods We enrolled newly diagnosed pts with invasive HER2-negative BC who underwent curative surgery from January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023 in Japan. Patient selection was based on the inclusion criteria from the OlympiA trial1). Specifically, ER-positive pts required either ≥ 4 positive lymph nodes after surgery or non-pathological complete response (pCR) with a CPS+EG score ≥ 3 following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). ER-negative pts required an invasive tumor >2 cm or ≥ 1 nodal metastasis after surgery, or non-pCR after NAC. Furthermore, we collected both patient-level and institutional data. The primary outcome was the proportion of pts who underwent gBRCA testing. Secondary outcomes included: (1) factors linked to no testing; (2) proportion of PVs among those tested; (3) proportion of pts with gBRCA PVs who started OLA; and (4) other treatments used in pts with gBRCA PVs not receiving OLA. Based on a previous U.S. report in which 87% of young women with BC underwent gBRCA testing2), we hypothesized that at least 88% of eligible pts should be tested. Assuming an expected testing rate of 88%, a sample size of 688 pts was required to maintain a 95% confidence interval (CI) width of 0.05. The target sample size was set at 700 to account for potential exclusions. Results Of 824 pts recruited from 46 facilities during the primary enrollment, 700 were randomly selected for secondary registration. After excluding 9 ineligible pts, a total of 691 were analyzed. The median age was 62 [20-96] years, 99% were female, 52 had bilateral BC, 157 had a family history of BC, and 18 had dementia. ER status was positive in 51%. NAC was administered to 362 pts (52%), including 148 (21%) with ER-positive BC, while 199 (29%) ER-positive BC pts had upfront surgery. Regarding facility characteristics, the median number of breast cancer specialists per facility was 3 [1-17], and genetic counselors were available in 27 facilities (59%). gBRCA testing was performed in 437 of 691 pts (63.2%; 95% CI, 59.5-66.9). Of 254 untested patients, 168 (66%) were not informed, mainly due to physician oversight (57%) or perceived ineligibility related to age, comorbidities, or treatment refusal (40%). Among 69 pts who were informed but declined testing, the reasons for no testing were psychological distress (46%), cost of testing (35%), and concerns about genetic implications for family members (12%). Among 42 pts (9.6%) with gBRCA PVs (10 pts were ER-positive), 32 received OLA. Of the remaining 10, all but 3 had perioperative chemot
背景:在her2阴性、高危早期乳腺癌(BC)患者中,佐剂(adj)奥拉帕尼(OLA)可显著提高携带种系BRCA1或BRCA2 (gBRCA)致病变异(pv)患者的侵袭性无病生存期和总生存期。为了优化临床结果,及时进行gBRCA检测作为辅助诊断是必不可少的。然而,gBRCA检测在这一人群中的实际应用情况仍不清楚。方法:我们招募了2023年1月1日至2023年12月31日在日本接受根治性手术的新诊断的侵袭性her2阴性BC患者。患者的选择基于奥林匹亚试验的纳入标准1)。具体来说,er阳性患者需要手术后淋巴结≥4个阳性或新辅助化疗(NAC)后CPS+EG评分≥3的非病理性完全缓解(pCR)。er阴性患者需要行浸润性肿瘤检查;术后2 cm或≥1个淋巴结转移,或NAC术后无pcr。此外,我们收集了患者层面和机构层面的数据。主要结果是接受gBRCA检测的患者比例。次要结局包括:(1)与未检测相关的因素;(2)被测者中pv的比例;(3) gBRCA pv患者开始OLA的比例;(4)未接受OLA治疗的gBRCA pv患者的其他治疗方法。根据美国之前的一份报告,87%的BC年轻女性接受了gBRCA检测,我们假设至少88%的符合条件的患者应该接受检测。假设预期检验率为88%,则需要688个点的样本量来维持95%置信区间(CI)宽度为0.05。目标样本量设定为700,以考虑潜在的排除。结果在初级登记期间从46个机构招募了824名患者,随机抽取700名患者进行二级登记。在排除9名不合格患者后,共分析691名患者。中位年龄62岁[20-96],99%为女性,52例双侧BC, 157例BC家族史,18例痴呆。51%的患者ER阳性。362例(52%)患者接受NAC治疗,其中148例(21%)er阳性BC患者接受NAC治疗,199例(29%)er阳性BC患者接受前期手术。关于机构特征,每家机构的乳腺癌专家中位数为3人[1-17],27家机构(59%)提供遗传咨询师。691名患者中有437人进行了gBRCA检测(63.2%;95% CI, 59.5-66.9)。在254名未检测的患者中,168名(66%)未被告知,主要是由于医生疏忽(57%)或认为与年龄、合并症或拒绝治疗相关的不合格(40%)。在69名被告知但拒绝检测的患者中,不进行检测的原因是心理困扰(46%)、检测成本(35%)和担心对家庭成员的遗传影响(12%)。在42例(9.6%)gBRCA pv患者中(10例er阳性),32例接受了OLA治疗。其余10例中,除3例外,其余均行围手术期化疗,均未接受阿贝马昔利。我们对漏检的多变量分析结果将在会议上公布。结论:尽管gBRCA检测在临床上作为辅助诊断具有重要意义,但在现实世界中,及时的gBRCA检测并未得到充分利用。三分之二未接受检测的患者未被告知该检测方案,这凸显了临床试验证据与实践之间的潜在差距。为了确保公平获得基因检测,需要更大的努力来提高医生的意识,并简化支持基因检测的机构工作流程。1) Geyer CE等。中国生物医学工程学报,2010;33(12):1250-1268。2) Rosenberg SM等。中华医学杂志,2016;2(6):730-736。引用格式:T. Taji, Y. Uemura, Y. Kimura, N. Maeda, A. Ito, H. Seki, D. Takabatake, M. Harao, S. Nakamoto, R. Matsunuma, C. Koganezawa, T. Iwamoto, H. Mukai, Y. Kikawa。日本her2阴性复发性高危早期乳腺癌患者将gBRCA检测作为奥拉帕尼的伴随诊断:一项横断多中心研究(brcaawareness)[摘要]。摘自:《2025年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集》;2025年12月9-12日;费城(PA): AACR;临床癌症杂志2026;32(4增刊):nr PS2-06-30。
{"title":"Abstract PS2-06-30: Real-world uptake of gBRCA testing as a companion diagnostic for olaparib in patients with HER2-negative recurrent high-risk early breast cancer in Japan: a cross-sectional multicenter study (BRCAwareness)","authors":"T. Taji, Y. Uemura, Y. Kimura, N. Maeda, A. Ito, H. Seki, D. Takabatake, M. Harao, S. Nakamoto, R. Matsunuma, C. Koganezawa, T. Iwamoto, H. Mukai, Y. Kikawa","doi":"10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps2-06-30","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps2-06-30","url":null,"abstract":"Background In patients (pts) with HER2-negative, high-risk early breast cancer (BC), adjuvant (adj) olaparib (OLA) significantly improves invasive disease-free survival and overall survival in those carrying germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 (gBRCA) pathogenic variants (PVs) 1). To optimize clinical outcomes, timely gBRCA testing as a companion diagnostic is essential. However, the real-world uptake of gBRCA testing in this population remains unclear. Methods We enrolled newly diagnosed pts with invasive HER2-negative BC who underwent curative surgery from January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023 in Japan. Patient selection was based on the inclusion criteria from the OlympiA trial1). Specifically, ER-positive pts required either ≥ 4 positive lymph nodes after surgery or non-pathological complete response (pCR) with a CPS+EG score ≥ 3 following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). ER-negative pts required an invasive tumor >2 cm or ≥ 1 nodal metastasis after surgery, or non-pCR after NAC. Furthermore, we collected both patient-level and institutional data. The primary outcome was the proportion of pts who underwent gBRCA testing. Secondary outcomes included: (1) factors linked to no testing; (2) proportion of PVs among those tested; (3) proportion of pts with gBRCA PVs who started OLA; and (4) other treatments used in pts with gBRCA PVs not receiving OLA. Based on a previous U.S. report in which 87% of young women with BC underwent gBRCA testing2), we hypothesized that at least 88% of eligible pts should be tested. Assuming an expected testing rate of 88%, a sample size of 688 pts was required to maintain a 95% confidence interval (CI) width of 0.05. The target sample size was set at 700 to account for potential exclusions. Results Of 824 pts recruited from 46 facilities during the primary enrollment, 700 were randomly selected for secondary registration. After excluding 9 ineligible pts, a total of 691 were analyzed. The median age was 62 [20-96] years, 99% were female, 52 had bilateral BC, 157 had a family history of BC, and 18 had dementia. ER status was positive in 51%. NAC was administered to 362 pts (52%), including 148 (21%) with ER-positive BC, while 199 (29%) ER-positive BC pts had upfront surgery. Regarding facility characteristics, the median number of breast cancer specialists per facility was 3 [1-17], and genetic counselors were available in 27 facilities (59%). gBRCA testing was performed in 437 of 691 pts (63.2%; 95% CI, 59.5-66.9). Of 254 untested patients, 168 (66%) were not informed, mainly due to physician oversight (57%) or perceived ineligibility related to age, comorbidities, or treatment refusal (40%). Among 69 pts who were informed but declined testing, the reasons for no testing were psychological distress (46%), cost of testing (35%), and concerns about genetic implications for family members (12%). Among 42 pts (9.6%) with gBRCA PVs (10 pts were ER-positive), 32 received OLA. Of the remaining 10, all but 3 had perioperative chemot","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146204843","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-17DOI: 10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps1-13-17
E. K. Blige, K. V. Ballman, A. Michmerhuizen, M. Vater, L. A. Carey, A. H. Partridge, W. F. Symmans, M. A. Watson, C. M. Perou, D. G. Stover, H. S. Rugo
Background: Microtubule inhibitors remain a standard chemotherapy in the management of HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). CALGB (Alliance) 40502 was a phase 3 randomized study involving 799 patients with MBC receiving first-line chemotherapy, to determine the optimal chemotherapeutic agent among paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel, or ixabepilone (with or without bevacizumab). Secondary analysis suggested inferior PFS with nab-paclitaxel specifically among patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+)/HER2-negative breast cancer. Correlative analysis demonstrated significant association of stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) with improved progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in CALGB40502. We hypothesized that immune activation would be associated with differential benefit among distinct microtubule agents. To address this, we evaluated the sTILs and RNA-based immune features association with clinical outcomes, including evaluation of nab-paclitaxel versus paclitaxel. Methods: To limit heterogeneity, analyses focused on pre-treatment primary tumor breast samples with central review/pathologist-enumerated sTILs in accordance with International TILs Working Group methods and RNAseq (n = 280). PAM50 molecular subtypes were assigned based on transcriptomic features. RNAseq data were used to generate immune deconvolution estimates from 5 distinct algorithms (CIBERSORT, xCell, ABIS, ConsensusTME, ImmuCellAI). 1,018 curated breast cancer gene expression signatures GES) were derived from previously published studies. Associations between sTILs and GES were evaluated with sTILs being a categorical variable with the thresholds <5% (low) and (≥5%) high. Results: In the evaluable population, basal-like PAM50 subtype was enriched for high sTILs category (p=1e-4), as anticipated. T-cell and B-cell immune signatures and immune deconvolution estimates were among most highly associated with sTILs. In addition to the expected prognostic association of high T-cell GES, high B-cell-related IgG signature score was also significantly associated with improved overall survival (OS) among triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in CALGB 40502 (HR = 0.50,95% CI:0.30-0.86, log-rank p=0.01) but not in HR+/HER2-. In an exploratory analysis of young patients (age at study entry <50 years), high sTILs were associated with improved OS among TNBC patients but worse OS among those with HR+/HER2- MBC (HR = 2.19, 95% CI:1.10-4.36, log-rank p=0.022). High (above median) RNA-based Xcell total immune score was significantly associated with worse OS in both CALGB 40502 and a validation dataset of primary breast cancers, METABRIC (OS HR = 2.12, 95% CI:1.01-4.45, log-rank p=0.042). To further investigate the clinical trial finding of inferior PFS for nab-paclitaxel compared with paclitaxel in patients with HR+/HER2- MBC, there was a significant enrichment of T-cell signatures associated with poor outcome in patients receiving nab-paclitaxel (Fisher exa
背景:微管抑制剂仍然是治疗her2阴性转移性乳腺癌(MBC)的标准化疗方案。CALGB (Alliance) 40502是一项3期随机研究,涉及799名接受一线化疗的MBC患者,以确定紫杉醇,nab-紫杉醇或伊沙匹龙(含或不含贝伐单抗)中的最佳化疗药物。二次分析表明,在激素受体阳性(HR+)/ her2阴性乳腺癌患者中,nab-紫杉醇治疗的PFS较差。相关分析显示,CALGB40502间质瘤浸润淋巴细胞(stil)与改善的无进展(PFS)和总生存(OS)有显著相关性。我们假设免疫激活将与不同微管药物的不同益处相关。为了解决这个问题,我们评估了stil和基于rna的免疫特征与临床结果的关联,包括nab-紫杉醇与紫杉醇的评估。方法:为了限制异质性,根据国际til工作组的方法和RNAseq (n = 280),分析集中在治疗前原发肿瘤乳腺样本中,这些样本具有中心审查/病理学家点算的stil。根据转录组学特征划分PAM50分子亚型。RNAseq数据用于从5种不同的算法(CIBERSORT, xCell, ABIS, consensusme, ImmuCellAI)生成免疫反卷积估计。1018个精心策划的乳腺癌基因表达特征(GES)来自先前发表的研究。评估sTILs与GES之间的关系,将sTILs作为具有阈值的分类变量&;lt;5%(低)和(≥5%)高。结果:在可评估人群中,基底样PAM50亚型在高sTILs类别中富集(p=1e-4),正如预期的那样。t细胞和b细胞免疫特征和免疫反褶积估计与stil高度相关。除了预期的高t细胞GES与预后相关外,高b细胞相关IgG特征评分也与CALGB 40502中三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)总生存期(OS)的改善显著相关(HR = 0.50,95% CI:0.30-0.86, log-rank p=0.01),但在HR+/HER2-中无显著相关性。在一项针对年轻患者(研究开始时年龄为50岁)的探索性分析中,高stil与TNBC患者的OS改善相关,但与HR+/HER2- MBC患者的OS恶化相关(HR = 2.19, 95% CI:1.10-4.36, log-rank p=0.022)。在CALGB 40502和原发性乳腺癌验证数据集METABRIC中,高(高于中位数)RNA-based Xcell总免疫评分与较差的OS显著相关(OS HR = 2.12, 95% CI:1.01-4.45, log-rank p=0.042)。为了进一步研究在HR+/HER2- MBC患者中,与紫杉醇相比,nab-紫杉醇治疗的PFS较差的临床研究发现,接受nab-紫杉醇治疗的患者的t细胞特征显著富集,与预后差相关(Fisher精确p&;lt;0.001)。结论:在这项来自大型III期临床试验的stil和RNAseq的翻译分析中,stil和免疫特征并不一致地与更好的结果相关。相反,在年轻的HR+/HER2-乳腺癌患者中,较高的stil或免疫特征与较差的OS相关,而在HR+/HER2- MBC患者中,较高的t细胞特征与较差的nab-紫杉醇PFS相关。这些数据强化了上下文/亚型特异性肿瘤免疫微环境询问的重要性。https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org。百时美施贵宝(Bristol Myers Squibb);临床试验网站标识:NCT00785291引文格式:E. K. Blige, K. V. Ballman, A. micmerhuizen, M. Vater, L. A. Carey, A. H. Partridge, W. F. Symmans, M. A. Watson, C. M. Perou, D. G. Stover, H. S. Rugo。基于rna的免疫特征与不同微管抑制剂治疗转移性her2阴性乳腺癌的获益相关:calgb 40502(联盟)iii期随机临床试验的事后分析[摘要]。摘自:《2025年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集》;2025年12月9-12日;费城(PA): AACR;临床癌症杂志2026;32(4增刊):nr PS1-13-17。
{"title":"Abstract PS1-13-17: Rna-based immune features associated with benefit from distinct microtubule inhibitor therapy for metastatic her2-negative breast cancer: a post hoc analysis of the calgb 40502 (alliance) phase iii randomized clinical trial","authors":"E. K. Blige, K. V. Ballman, A. Michmerhuizen, M. Vater, L. A. Carey, A. H. Partridge, W. F. Symmans, M. A. Watson, C. M. Perou, D. G. Stover, H. S. Rugo","doi":"10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps1-13-17","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps1-13-17","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Microtubule inhibitors remain a standard chemotherapy in the management of HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). CALGB (Alliance) 40502 was a phase 3 randomized study involving 799 patients with MBC receiving first-line chemotherapy, to determine the optimal chemotherapeutic agent among paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel, or ixabepilone (with or without bevacizumab). Secondary analysis suggested inferior PFS with nab-paclitaxel specifically among patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+)/HER2-negative breast cancer. Correlative analysis demonstrated significant association of stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) with improved progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in CALGB40502. We hypothesized that immune activation would be associated with differential benefit among distinct microtubule agents. To address this, we evaluated the sTILs and RNA-based immune features association with clinical outcomes, including evaluation of nab-paclitaxel versus paclitaxel. Methods: To limit heterogeneity, analyses focused on pre-treatment primary tumor breast samples with central review/pathologist-enumerated sTILs in accordance with International TILs Working Group methods and RNAseq (n = 280). PAM50 molecular subtypes were assigned based on transcriptomic features. RNAseq data were used to generate immune deconvolution estimates from 5 distinct algorithms (CIBERSORT, xCell, ABIS, ConsensusTME, ImmuCellAI). 1,018 curated breast cancer gene expression signatures GES) were derived from previously published studies. Associations between sTILs and GES were evaluated with sTILs being a categorical variable with the thresholds &lt;5% (low) and (≥5%) high. Results: In the evaluable population, basal-like PAM50 subtype was enriched for high sTILs category (p=1e-4), as anticipated. T-cell and B-cell immune signatures and immune deconvolution estimates were among most highly associated with sTILs. In addition to the expected prognostic association of high T-cell GES, high B-cell-related IgG signature score was also significantly associated with improved overall survival (OS) among triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in CALGB 40502 (HR = 0.50,95% CI:0.30-0.86, log-rank p=0.01) but not in HR+/HER2-. In an exploratory analysis of young patients (age at study entry &lt;50 years), high sTILs were associated with improved OS among TNBC patients but worse OS among those with HR+/HER2- MBC (HR = 2.19, 95% CI:1.10-4.36, log-rank p=0.022). High (above median) RNA-based Xcell total immune score was significantly associated with worse OS in both CALGB 40502 and a validation dataset of primary breast cancers, METABRIC (OS HR = 2.12, 95% CI:1.01-4.45, log-rank p=0.042). To further investigate the clinical trial finding of inferior PFS for nab-paclitaxel compared with paclitaxel in patients with HR+/HER2- MBC, there was a significant enrichment of T-cell signatures associated with poor outcome in patients receiving nab-paclitaxel (Fisher exa","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146204846","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-17DOI: 10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps5-01-28
J. Chien, E. Neuberger, S. Simon, K. Watkins, G. Curigliano, B. Li, S. Stergiopoulos, M. Czachorowski, H. Itakura
Background: US and EU treatment guidelines currently recommend tucatinib in combination with trastuzumab and capecitabine (TTC) in third-line (3L) for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC), and in second-line (2L) for those patients with brain metastases (BM). More recently, trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) has become the recommended 2L treatment option and may be considered as first-line treatment for patients with rapid progression after (neo)adjuvant therapy. Previous real-world studies in patients receiving TTC after T-DXd have reported median time to next treatment (TTNT) of 6 months and median overall survival (OS) of 13 months; however, these study populations included later line treatment, a small sample size, and did not solely include TTC immediately following T-DXd, limiting applicability to current clinical practice. This study aimed to describe real-world outcomes in patients with HER2+ MBC in the US who were treated with TTC in 2L, 3L and fourth-line (4L) immediately following T-DXd. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of patients with HER2+ MBC receiving TTC therapy using the Flatiron Health electronic health record (EHR)-derived deidentified longitudinal database. This US nationwide database, containing patient-level structured and unstructured data curated using natural language processing with machine learning and technology-enabled abstraction, includes >720,000 patients with breast cancer. Patients included were diagnosed with HER2+ MBC (January 2017 to July 2024), treated with TTC in 2L, 3L or 4L immediately following T-DXd, and were not enrolled in clinical trials. Patients were assessed from the start of TTC (index date) to death, last medical activity, or end of available study follow-up (January 2025), whichever came first. Primary outcomes included, but were not limited to, TTNT and OS in all patients. Exploratory analyses will assess TTNT and OS in patients stratified by BM status, duration of T-DXd treatment, and hormone receptor status. Descriptive statistics were used for patient characteristics, and outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analyses. Results: In total, 92 patients with HER2+ MBC received TTC immediately following T-DXd. Overall, median (95% CI) TTNT was 8.6 (5.7-11.6) months and median (95% CI) OS was 19.5 (12.0-26.1) months (Table). Exploratory outcomes will be presented in future analyses. Conclusion: Patients with HER2+ MBC benefit from TTC immediately after treatment with T-DXd, demonstrating its clinically meaningful activity in a contemporaneous post-T-DXd setting. These results reinforce the effectiveness of tucatinib, with longer TTNT and OS than in previous real-world studies, in a population more applicable to current clinical practice. Citation Format: J. Chien, E. Neuberger, S. Simon, K. Watkins, G. Curigliano, B. Li, S. Stergiopoulos, M. Czachorowski, H. Itakura. Us real-world clinical outcomes of t
背景:美国和欧盟治疗指南目前推荐图卡替尼联合曲妥珠单抗和卡培他滨(TTC)用于人表皮生长因子受体2阳性(HER2+)转移性乳腺癌(MBC)患者的三线治疗(3L),以及脑转移(BM)患者的二线治疗(2L)。最近,曲妥珠单抗德鲁西替康(T-DXd)已成为推荐的2L治疗方案,可被视为(新)辅助治疗后快速进展患者的一线治疗。先前在T-DXd后接受TTC的患者中进行的现实研究报告称,到下一次治疗的中位时间(TTNT)为6个月,中位总生存期(OS)为13个月;然而,这些研究人群包括较晚的一线治疗,样本量小,并且不仅仅包括T-DXd后立即进行的TTC,限制了对当前临床实践的适用性。本研究旨在描述美国HER2+ MBC患者在T-DXd后立即接受2L、3L和四线(4L) TTC治疗的真实结果。方法:我们使用Flatiron Health电子健康记录(EHR)衍生的纵向数据库对接受TTC治疗的HER2+ MBC患者进行了回顾性队列分析。这个美国全国性的数据库,包含使用自然语言处理与机器学习和技术支持的抽象管理的患者级结构化和非结构化数据,包括&;gt;72万名乳腺癌患者。纳入的患者被诊断为HER2+ MBC(2017年1月至2024年7月),在T-DXd后立即接受2L、3L或4L的TTC治疗,未参加临床试验。从TTC开始(索引日期)到死亡、最后一次医疗活动或可用研究随访结束(2025年1月),以先到者为准对患者进行评估。主要结局包括但不限于所有患者的TTNT和OS。探索性分析将评估按BM状态、T-DXd治疗持续时间和激素受体状态分层的患者的TTNT和OS。患者特征采用描述性统计,结果采用Kaplan-Meier分析评估。结果:共有92例HER2+ MBC患者在T-DXd后立即接受TTC治疗。总体而言,中位(95% CI) TTNT为8.6(5.7-11.6)个月,中位(95% CI) OS为19.5(12.0-26.1)个月(表)。探索性结果将在未来的分析中提出。结论:HER2+ MBC患者在接受T-DXd治疗后立即受益于TTC,显示其在同期T-DXd后的临床有意义的活性。这些结果加强了图卡替尼的有效性,与之前的现实世界研究相比,在更适用于当前临床实践的人群中,图卡替尼的TTNT和OS更长。引用格式:J. Chien, E. Neuberger, S. Simon, K. Watkins, G. Curigliano, B. Li, S. Stergiopoulos, M. Czachorowski, H. Itakura。图卡替尼、曲妥珠单抗和卡培他滨在曲妥珠单抗德鲁西替康之后治疗her2+转移性乳腺癌的真实世界临床结果[摘要]。摘自:《2025年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集》;2025年12月9-12日;费城(PA): AACR;临床癌症杂志2026;32(4增刊):nr PS5-01-28。
{"title":"Abstract PS5-01-28: Us real-world clinical outcomes of tucatinib, trastuzumab, and capecitabine following trastuzumab deruxtecan for the treatment of her2+ metastatic breast cancer","authors":"J. Chien, E. Neuberger, S. Simon, K. Watkins, G. Curigliano, B. Li, S. Stergiopoulos, M. Czachorowski, H. Itakura","doi":"10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps5-01-28","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps5-01-28","url":null,"abstract":"Background: US and EU treatment guidelines currently recommend tucatinib in combination with trastuzumab and capecitabine (TTC) in third-line (3L) for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC), and in second-line (2L) for those patients with brain metastases (BM). More recently, trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) has become the recommended 2L treatment option and may be considered as first-line treatment for patients with rapid progression after (neo)adjuvant therapy. Previous real-world studies in patients receiving TTC after T-DXd have reported median time to next treatment (TTNT) of 6 months and median overall survival (OS) of 13 months; however, these study populations included later line treatment, a small sample size, and did not solely include TTC immediately following T-DXd, limiting applicability to current clinical practice. This study aimed to describe real-world outcomes in patients with HER2+ MBC in the US who were treated with TTC in 2L, 3L and fourth-line (4L) immediately following T-DXd. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of patients with HER2+ MBC receiving TTC therapy using the Flatiron Health electronic health record (EHR)-derived deidentified longitudinal database. This US nationwide database, containing patient-level structured and unstructured data curated using natural language processing with machine learning and technology-enabled abstraction, includes &gt;720,000 patients with breast cancer. Patients included were diagnosed with HER2+ MBC (January 2017 to July 2024), treated with TTC in 2L, 3L or 4L immediately following T-DXd, and were not enrolled in clinical trials. Patients were assessed from the start of TTC (index date) to death, last medical activity, or end of available study follow-up (January 2025), whichever came first. Primary outcomes included, but were not limited to, TTNT and OS in all patients. Exploratory analyses will assess TTNT and OS in patients stratified by BM status, duration of T-DXd treatment, and hormone receptor status. Descriptive statistics were used for patient characteristics, and outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analyses. Results: In total, 92 patients with HER2+ MBC received TTC immediately following T-DXd. Overall, median (95% CI) TTNT was 8.6 (5.7-11.6) months and median (95% CI) OS was 19.5 (12.0-26.1) months (Table). Exploratory outcomes will be presented in future analyses. Conclusion: Patients with HER2+ MBC benefit from TTC immediately after treatment with T-DXd, demonstrating its clinically meaningful activity in a contemporaneous post-T-DXd setting. These results reinforce the effectiveness of tucatinib, with longer TTNT and OS than in previous real-world studies, in a population more applicable to current clinical practice. Citation Format: J. Chien, E. Neuberger, S. Simon, K. Watkins, G. Curigliano, B. Li, S. Stergiopoulos, M. Czachorowski, H. Itakura. Us real-world clinical outcomes of t","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146204851","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-17DOI: 10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-rf4-01
O. Metzger, S. Mandrekar, T. Dockter, L. Gianni, E. Ciruelos, A. De Michele, J. Gligorov, E. Lim, S. Loibl, X. Gonzàlez Farré, F. Lynce, J. Lanzillotti, L. Carey, S. Goel, A. Partridge, E. Winer
Background Central nervous system (CNS) metastases are a major clinical concern in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The PATINA phase III study showed improved PFS with palbociclib added to maintenance anti-HER2/endocrine therapy (44.3 vs. 29.1 months; hazard ratio 0.75; 95% CI 0.59-0.96; 1-sided P=0.0109). Preclinical and early clinical data suggest palbociclib may have CNS activity. We conducted a pre-specified secondary analysis to evaluate the incidence and timing of CNS progression. Methods CNS progression was defined as the emergence of new intracranial lesions per investigator assessment. Baseline CNS imaging was not mandated but recommended if symptomatic. Competing risks analyses evaluated time from registration to first CNS progression or death (CNS PFS), treating non-CNS progression as a competing event. All randomized patients were included in the primary analysis, regardless of known baseline CNS involvement. Patients with baseline CNS metastases were not censored if progression involved the CNS. A secondary analysis excluded patients with CNS metastases present at baseline. Cumulative incidence functions were estimated and compared using 2-sided Gray’s test. Results Data cutoff for this analysis was on October 15, 2024. 518 participants were enrolled between June 2017 and July 2021, 261 to the palbociclib arm and 257 to the control arm. CNS metastases at baseline were present in 11 patients in the palbociclib arm and 9 patients in the control arm. Among all randomized patients, CNS progression occurred in 35 of 261 (13.4%; 95% CI: 9.5-18.2) in the palbociclib arm and 50 of 257 (19.5%; 95% CI: 14.8-24.8) in the control arm. When excluding patients with CNS metastases at baseline, CNS progression was observed in 32 of 250 (12.8%; 95% CI: 8.9-17.6) in the palbociclib arm and 47 of 248 (19.0%; 95% CI: 14.3-24.4) in the control arm. The median follow-up for patients who were alive and progression-free was 53.5 months. At 36 months, the cumulative incidence of CNS PFS was 13.4% vs. 19.9% for palbociclib versus control (Gray’s test p=0.0386). Importantly, when the analysis was restricted to pts without evidence of CNS disease at baseline (Table 1), —the CNS benefit with palbociclib was maintained (13.0% vs. 19.2% at 36 months, Gray’s test p = 0.0378). Conclusion The addition of palbociclib to anti-HER2 and endocrine therapy was associated with a lower incidence of CNS metastases. Among patients without known baseline CNS involvement, the absolute reduction in CNS progression at 36 months was 6.2% in favor of palbociclib. This benefit was observed at 12 months and sustained over 3 years (Table 1). These findings suggest that palbociclib may help delay or prevent CNS involvement in HR+/HER2+ MBC, warranting confirmation in future studies. Citation Format: O. Metzger, S. Mandrekar, T. Dockter, L. Gianni, E. Ciruelos, A. De Michele, J. Gligorov, E. Lim, S. Loibl, X. Gonzàlez Farré, F. Lynce, J. Lanzillotti, L. Carey,
中枢神经系统(CNS)转移是her2阳性转移性乳腺癌(MBC)患者的主要临床问题。PATINA III期研究显示,在维持抗her2 /内分泌治疗中加入帕博西尼可改善PFS(44.3个月vs 29.1个月;风险比0.75;95% CI 0.59-0.96;单侧P=0.0109)。临床前和早期临床数据提示帕博西尼可能具有中枢神经系统活性。我们进行了预先指定的二次分析,以评估中枢神经系统进展的发生率和时间。方法根据研究者的评估,将CNS进展定义为出现新的颅内病变。基线中枢神经系统成像不是强制性的,但如果有症状,建议进行。竞争风险分析评估了从注册到首次中枢神经系统进展或死亡(CNS PFS)的时间,将非中枢神经系统进展视为竞争事件。所有随机患者均纳入初步分析,无论已知基线中枢神经系统是否受累。基线中枢神经系统转移的患者如果进展累及中枢神经系统,则不进行审查。二次分析排除了基线时存在中枢神经系统转移的患者。累积关联函数估计和比较使用双侧格雷检验。本分析的数据截止日期为2024年10月15日。在2017年6月至2021年7月期间,518名参与者入组,帕博西尼组261名,对照组257名。帕博西尼组的11例患者和对照组的9例患者在基线时出现中枢神经系统转移。在所有随机分组的患者中,帕博西尼组261例患者中有35例(13.4%;95% CI: 9.5-18.2)出现中枢神经系统进展,对照组257例患者中有50例(19.5%;95% CI: 14.8-24.8)出现中枢神经系统进展。当排除基线时中枢神经系统转移的患者时,帕博西尼组250人中有32人(12.8%;95% CI: 8.9-17.6)观察到中枢神经系统进展,对照组248人中有47人(19.0%;95% CI: 14.3-24.4)观察到中枢神经系统进展。存活且无进展患者的中位随访时间为53.5个月。在36个月时,中枢神经系统PFS的累积发生率为13.4%,帕博西尼组为19.9%,对照组为19.9%(格雷检验p=0.0386)。重要的是,当分析局限于基线时没有中枢神经系统疾病证据的患者时(表1),帕博西尼对中枢神经系统的益处保持不变(36个月时13.0%对19.2%,Gray检验p = 0.0378)。结论帕博西尼联合抗her2和内分泌治疗可降低中枢神经系统转移的发生率。在基线无已知中枢神经系统受累的患者中,帕博西尼在36个月时中枢神经系统进展的绝对减少率为6.2%。这种益处在12个月后观察到,并持续了3年(表1)。这些发现提示palbociclib可能有助于延迟或预防HR+/HER2+ MBC的中枢神经系统受累,值得在未来的研究中证实。引用格式:O. Metzger, S. Mandrekar, T. Dockter, L. Gianni, E. Ciruelos, A. De Michele, J. Gligorov, E. Lim, S. Loibl, X. Gonzàlez farr, F. Lynce, J. Lanzillotti, L. Carey, S. Goel, A. Partridge, E. Winer。III期PATINA试验(AFT-38)的中枢神经系统结局[摘要]。摘自:《2025年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集》;2025年12月9-12日;费城(PA): AACR;临床癌症杂志2026;32(4增刊):nr RF4-01。
{"title":"Abstract RF4-01: Central Nervous System Outcomes from the Phase III PATINA Trial (AFT-38)","authors":"O. Metzger, S. Mandrekar, T. Dockter, L. Gianni, E. Ciruelos, A. De Michele, J. Gligorov, E. Lim, S. Loibl, X. Gonzàlez Farré, F. Lynce, J. Lanzillotti, L. Carey, S. Goel, A. Partridge, E. Winer","doi":"10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-rf4-01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-rf4-01","url":null,"abstract":"Background Central nervous system (CNS) metastases are a major clinical concern in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The PATINA phase III study showed improved PFS with palbociclib added to maintenance anti-HER2/endocrine therapy (44.3 vs. 29.1 months; hazard ratio 0.75; 95% CI 0.59-0.96; 1-sided P=0.0109). Preclinical and early clinical data suggest palbociclib may have CNS activity. We conducted a pre-specified secondary analysis to evaluate the incidence and timing of CNS progression. Methods CNS progression was defined as the emergence of new intracranial lesions per investigator assessment. Baseline CNS imaging was not mandated but recommended if symptomatic. Competing risks analyses evaluated time from registration to first CNS progression or death (CNS PFS), treating non-CNS progression as a competing event. All randomized patients were included in the primary analysis, regardless of known baseline CNS involvement. Patients with baseline CNS metastases were not censored if progression involved the CNS. A secondary analysis excluded patients with CNS metastases present at baseline. Cumulative incidence functions were estimated and compared using 2-sided Gray’s test. Results Data cutoff for this analysis was on October 15, 2024. 518 participants were enrolled between June 2017 and July 2021, 261 to the palbociclib arm and 257 to the control arm. CNS metastases at baseline were present in 11 patients in the palbociclib arm and 9 patients in the control arm. Among all randomized patients, CNS progression occurred in 35 of 261 (13.4%; 95% CI: 9.5-18.2) in the palbociclib arm and 50 of 257 (19.5%; 95% CI: 14.8-24.8) in the control arm. When excluding patients with CNS metastases at baseline, CNS progression was observed in 32 of 250 (12.8%; 95% CI: 8.9-17.6) in the palbociclib arm and 47 of 248 (19.0%; 95% CI: 14.3-24.4) in the control arm. The median follow-up for patients who were alive and progression-free was 53.5 months. At 36 months, the cumulative incidence of CNS PFS was 13.4% vs. 19.9% for palbociclib versus control (Gray’s test p=0.0386). Importantly, when the analysis was restricted to pts without evidence of CNS disease at baseline (Table 1), —the CNS benefit with palbociclib was maintained (13.0% vs. 19.2% at 36 months, Gray’s test p = 0.0378). Conclusion The addition of palbociclib to anti-HER2 and endocrine therapy was associated with a lower incidence of CNS metastases. Among patients without known baseline CNS involvement, the absolute reduction in CNS progression at 36 months was 6.2% in favor of palbociclib. This benefit was observed at 12 months and sustained over 3 years (Table 1). These findings suggest that palbociclib may help delay or prevent CNS involvement in HR+/HER2+ MBC, warranting confirmation in future studies. Citation Format: O. Metzger, S. Mandrekar, T. Dockter, L. Gianni, E. Ciruelos, A. De Michele, J. Gligorov, E. Lim, S. Loibl, X. Gonzàlez Farré, F. Lynce, J. Lanzillotti, L. Carey, ","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146204930","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-17DOI: 10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps2-12-22
L. Jingjing
Background: DNA damage plays a critical role in breast cancer, induced by both endogenous and exogenous factors. Abnormal repair mechanisms, such as homologous recombination repair (HRR) and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), result in genomic instability and the accumulation of mutations, thereby driving cellular malignant transformation. DNA damage also promotes tumor progression by activating inflammatory pathways and modulating the immune microenvironment, serving as a key basis for breast cancer development and treatment resistance. Core Findings: PRAK (p38-regulated/activated protein kinase) is highly expressed in breast cancer and significantly correlates with poor patient prognosis and reduced survival rates. In vitro and in vivo experiments demonstrate that PRAK deficiency sensitizes tumor cells to PARP inhibitors and impairs DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair capacity, leading to defects in the homologous recombination (HR) pathway. Molecular Mechanism: Through affinity chromatography, mass spectrometry, and co-immunoprecipitation, PRAK was confirmed to directly interact with FOXO3 in vitro and in vivo. DNA-damaging agents (PARP inhibitors) induce nuclear accumulation of FOXO3, promoting the interaction between PRAK and FOXO3 within the nucleus. RNA-seq analysis revealed that BRCA1 is a key target of PRAK. PRAK deficiency reduces FOXO3 nuclear localization and inhibits its binding to the BRCA1 promoter, thereby downregulating BRCA1 expression. In vivo validation demonstrated that PRAK deficiency enhances the sensitivity of mouse xenografts to DNA-damaging agents. Conclusions: PRAK is upregulated in multiple human tumor tissues. PRAK deficiency inhibits tumor cell proliferation and sensitizes cells to DNA-damaging agents. PRAK participates in HR-mediated DNA damage repair in an enzyme activity-independent manner. PRAK interacts with FOXO3, influences FOXO3 nuclear localization to regulate DNA damage responses, and affects FOXO3 binding to the BRCA1 promoter to modulate BRCA1 transcriptional activation. PRAK deficiency enhances tumor sensitivity to DNA-damaging drugs. Collectively, this study reveals that PRAK promotes DNA damage repair by transcriptionally regulating BRCA1 expression through FOXO3, representing a novel regulatory mechanism by which PRAK maintains genomic stability via DNA damage repair. Targeting the PRAK/FOXO3/BRCA1 axis may serve as a potential therapeutic strategy to enhance the efficacy of DNA-damaging agents in cancer treatment. Our findings uncover the functions and molecular mechanisms of PRAK in cell proliferation and DNA damage responses, with potential clinical implications for breast cancer therapy. Citation Format: L. Jingjing. The Molecular Mechanism of PRAK Regulating DNA Damage Repair and Its Role in Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl): nr PS2-12-22.
背景:DNA损伤在乳腺癌中起关键作用,内源性和外源性因素均可诱发。同源重组修复(homologous recombination repair, HRR)和非同源末端连接(non-homologous end joining, NHEJ)等异常修复机制导致基因组不稳定和突变积累,从而驱动细胞恶性转化。DNA损伤还通过激活炎症途径和调节免疫微环境来促进肿瘤进展,是乳腺癌发展和治疗耐药的关键基础。核心发现:PRAK (p38调节/活化蛋白激酶)在乳腺癌中高表达,与患者预后差和生存率降低显著相关。体外和体内实验表明,PRAK缺乏使肿瘤细胞对PARP抑制剂敏感,损害DNA双链断裂(DSB)修复能力,导致同源重组(HR)途径出现缺陷。分子机制:通过亲和层析、质谱、共免疫沉淀等方法,证实PRAK在体内外均与FOXO3直接相互作用。dna损伤剂(PARP抑制剂)诱导细胞核内FOXO3的积累,促进细胞核内PRAK和FOXO3的相互作用。RNA-seq分析显示BRCA1是PRAK的关键靶点。PRAK缺陷降低了FOXO3的核定位,抑制了其与BRCA1启动子的结合,从而下调了BRCA1的表达。体内验证表明,PRAK缺乏增强了小鼠异种移植物对dna损伤剂的敏感性。结论:PRAK在多种人类肿瘤组织中表达上调。PRAK缺乏抑制肿瘤细胞增殖并使细胞对dna损伤剂敏感。PRAK以不依赖酶活性的方式参与hr介导的DNA损伤修复。PRAK与FOXO3相互作用,影响FOXO3核定位调节DNA损伤反应,并影响FOXO3与BRCA1启动子结合调节BRCA1转录激活。PRAK缺乏增强肿瘤对dna损伤药物的敏感性。总之,本研究揭示了PRAK通过FOXO3转录调控BRCA1表达促进DNA损伤修复,代表了PRAK通过DNA损伤修复维持基因组稳定性的一种新的调控机制。靶向PRAK/FOXO3/BRCA1轴可能是一种潜在的治疗策略,可以提高dna损伤药物在癌症治疗中的疗效。我们的发现揭示了PRAK在细胞增殖和DNA损伤反应中的功能和分子机制,对乳腺癌治疗具有潜在的临床意义。引用格式:L.京晶。PRAK调控DNA损伤修复的分子机制及其在乳腺癌中的作用[摘要]。摘自:《2025年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集》;2025年12月9-12日;费城(PA): AACR;临床癌症杂志2026;32(4增刊):nr PS2-12-22。
{"title":"Abstract PS2-12-22: The Molecular Mechanism of PRAK Regulating DNA Damage Repair and Its Role in Breast Cancer","authors":"L. Jingjing","doi":"10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps2-12-22","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps2-12-22","url":null,"abstract":"Background: DNA damage plays a critical role in breast cancer, induced by both endogenous and exogenous factors. Abnormal repair mechanisms, such as homologous recombination repair (HRR) and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), result in genomic instability and the accumulation of mutations, thereby driving cellular malignant transformation. DNA damage also promotes tumor progression by activating inflammatory pathways and modulating the immune microenvironment, serving as a key basis for breast cancer development and treatment resistance. Core Findings: PRAK (p38-regulated/activated protein kinase) is highly expressed in breast cancer and significantly correlates with poor patient prognosis and reduced survival rates. In vitro and in vivo experiments demonstrate that PRAK deficiency sensitizes tumor cells to PARP inhibitors and impairs DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair capacity, leading to defects in the homologous recombination (HR) pathway. Molecular Mechanism: Through affinity chromatography, mass spectrometry, and co-immunoprecipitation, PRAK was confirmed to directly interact with FOXO3 in vitro and in vivo. DNA-damaging agents (PARP inhibitors) induce nuclear accumulation of FOXO3, promoting the interaction between PRAK and FOXO3 within the nucleus. RNA-seq analysis revealed that BRCA1 is a key target of PRAK. PRAK deficiency reduces FOXO3 nuclear localization and inhibits its binding to the BRCA1 promoter, thereby downregulating BRCA1 expression. In vivo validation demonstrated that PRAK deficiency enhances the sensitivity of mouse xenografts to DNA-damaging agents. Conclusions: PRAK is upregulated in multiple human tumor tissues. PRAK deficiency inhibits tumor cell proliferation and sensitizes cells to DNA-damaging agents. PRAK participates in HR-mediated DNA damage repair in an enzyme activity-independent manner. PRAK interacts with FOXO3, influences FOXO3 nuclear localization to regulate DNA damage responses, and affects FOXO3 binding to the BRCA1 promoter to modulate BRCA1 transcriptional activation. PRAK deficiency enhances tumor sensitivity to DNA-damaging drugs. Collectively, this study reveals that PRAK promotes DNA damage repair by transcriptionally regulating BRCA1 expression through FOXO3, representing a novel regulatory mechanism by which PRAK maintains genomic stability via DNA damage repair. Targeting the PRAK/FOXO3/BRCA1 axis may serve as a potential therapeutic strategy to enhance the efficacy of DNA-damaging agents in cancer treatment. Our findings uncover the functions and molecular mechanisms of PRAK in cell proliferation and DNA damage responses, with potential clinical implications for breast cancer therapy. Citation Format: L. Jingjing. The Molecular Mechanism of PRAK Regulating DNA Damage Repair and Its Role in Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl): nr PS2-12-22.","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":"177 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146204931","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-17DOI: 10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps5-08-16
U. Zürrer, A. Müller, O. Tredan, C. Micheloud, J. Musilova, R. Popescu, T. Schmid, L. Rossi, M. Schwitter, M. Vetter, M. Niemeyer, I. Witzel, A. Patsouris, S. Ladoire, J. Martin-Babau, A. Deleuze, M. Robert, L. H. Bender, M. Joerger
Background: Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) poses significant challenges due to its aggressiveness, high relapse rate and mortality. Neoadjuvant immuno-chemotherapy (NAIC) is now a common treatment for early-stage TNBC before surgery. NAIC aims to eliminate viable cancer in the tumor, lymph nodes and possible occult distant metastases, shrink tumors to improve surgical outcomes and prevent disease recurrence. The Keynote-522 study revealed a 84.5% 3-year event-free survival in patients with early-stage TNBC using NAIC and improved pathological complete response (pCR) rates from 51.2% with neoadjuvant Chemotherapy to 64.8% with NAIC. A new potential method to improve clinical outcome and induce immune activation pre-surgery is through a novel local therapy in combination with NAIC that could cause increased apoptotic cell death and create personalized tumor antigens. Arnaout et al. conducted a randomized, phase 2 neoadjuvant window of opportunity trial using intratumoral (IT) INT230-6, a drug comprising vinblastine, cisplatin and a tumor dispersion and cell penetration enhancer molecule (SHAO), evaluating clinical and biological effects in women with early-stage operable BC (NCT04781725). Results in T2 to T4 tumors showed an average of over 30% necrosis in 74% of subjects at the time of surgery, with some patients having >95% tumor necrosis following a single dose. Adding immune-activating and apoptotic induced necrosis caused by INT230-6 dosed prior to NAIC in TNBC patients has the potential to increase pCR. Methods: This is a randomized, open-label multicenter phase 2 clinical study to determine the clinical activity, safety, and tolerability of IT INT230-6 in patients with early-stage, operable TNBC in combination with NAIC (cohort A) or NAIC alone (cohort B). The INT230-6 dose is dependent on tumor size. The primary endpoint is pCR in the primary tumor (ypT0/Tis) and affected lymph nodes (ypN0). Key inclusion criteria include newly diagnosed, previously untreated, locally advanced non-metastatic TNBC stage cT1c N1-3 M0 or cT2-4c N0-3 M0. Multifocal and multicentric primary tumors are allowed. Patients must have measurable disease in the breast with at least one lesion with a diameter ≥1.5 cm visible in ultrasound and injectable. Patients are either male or female, age ≥ 18 years, ECOG performance status <2, adequate bone marrow, hepatic and renal function. STATS: The sample size calculation for both cohorts is determined based on a single-stage phase II single-arm clinical trial design (A’Hern). Null hypothesis (H0): pCR rate ≤ 0.6, Alternative hypothesis (H1): pCR rate ≥ 0.8. Type I error: 10% (one-sided), Power: 80%. The duration for accrual, patient therapy and follow-up is 12, 8 and 36 months respectively. The sample size per cohort is 27 patients. The study is recruiting in Switzerland and France in up to 16 sites. Results: By July 2025 15 of 54 patients could be enrolled, completion of accrual is expected in 2026. Prel
背景:三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)因其侵袭性、高复发率和死亡率而面临重大挑战。新辅助免疫化疗(NAIC)现在是手术前早期TNBC的常用治疗方法。NAIC旨在消除肿瘤、淋巴结和可能的隐匿性远处转移的活癌,缩小肿瘤以改善手术效果,预防疾病复发。Keynote-522研究显示,使用NAIC的早期TNBC患者3年无事件生存率为84.5%,病理完全缓解(pCR)率从新辅助化疗的51.2%提高到NAIC的64.8%。一种可能改善临床结果和在手术前诱导免疫激活的新方法是通过一种新的局部治疗与NAIC联合使用,这可能导致凋亡细胞死亡增加并产生个性化的肿瘤抗原。Arnaout等人使用肿瘤内(IT) INT230-6(一种由长春花碱、顺铂和肿瘤分散和细胞渗透增强分子(SHAO)组成的药物)进行了一项随机的2期新辅助试验,评估了早期可手术BC女性的临床和生物学效应(NCT04781725)。结果T2 ~ T4肿瘤在手术时74%的患者平均坏死超过30%,部分患者有&;gt;一次注射后95%的肿瘤坏死。在NAIC之前给药的TNBC患者中加入由INT230-6引起的免疫激活和凋亡诱导的坏死可能会增加pCR。方法:这是一项随机、开放标签的多中心2期临床研究,旨在确定IT INT230-6在早期可手术TNBC患者中联合NAIC(队列a)或单独NAIC(队列B)的临床活性、安全性和耐受性。INT230-6的剂量取决于肿瘤大小。主要终点是原发肿瘤(ypT0/Tis)和受影响淋巴结(ypN0)的pCR。主要入选标准包括新诊断、既往未治疗、局部晚期非转移性TNBC分期cT1c N1-3 M0或cT2-4c N0-3 M0。多灶、多中心原发肿瘤是允许的。患者必须有可测量的乳腺病变,且至少有一个直径≥1.5 cm的超声可见且可注射的病变。患者男女不限,年龄≥18岁,ECOG功能状态;2、骨髓、肝肾功能充足。STATS:两个队列的样本量计算基于单阶段II期单臂临床试验设计(a 'Hern)。原假设(H0): pCR率≤0.6,备用假设(H1): pCR率≥0.8。I型误差:10%(单侧),功率:80%。累计时间12个月,患者治疗时间8个月,随访时间36个月。每个队列的样本量为27例患者。这项研究正在瑞士和法国多达16个地点进行招募。结果:到2025年7月,54例患者中有15例可入组,预计2026年完成。初步安全性数据未显示意外或严重的与INT230-6相关的不良事件。pCR结果可在最后一位患者开始SOC并接受手术后6个月获得。将展示一个病人的典型案例。引文格式:U. z rrer, A. m ller, O. Tredan, C. Micheloud, J. Musilova, R. Popescu, T. Schmid, L. Rossi, M. Schwitter, M. Vetter, M. Niemeyer, I. Witzel, A. Patsouris, S. Ladoire, J. Martin-Babau, A. Deleuze, M. Robert, L. H. Bender, M. Joerger。早期三阴性乳腺癌新辅助免疫化疗前瘤内注射INT230-6:来自INVINCIBLE-4-SAKK 66/22 (NCT06358573) II期随机对照试验的早期观察[摘要]。摘自:《2025年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集》;2025年12月9-12日;费城(PA): AACR;临床癌症杂志2026;32(4增刊):nr PS5-08-16。
{"title":"Abstract PS5-08-16: Intratumoral Injections of INT230-6 Prior to Neoadjuvant Immuno-chemotherapy in Early-Stage Triple Negative Breast Cancer: Early observations from INVINCIBLE-4-SAKK 66/22 (NCT06358573), a Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"U. Zürrer, A. Müller, O. Tredan, C. Micheloud, J. Musilova, R. Popescu, T. Schmid, L. Rossi, M. Schwitter, M. Vetter, M. Niemeyer, I. Witzel, A. Patsouris, S. Ladoire, J. Martin-Babau, A. Deleuze, M. Robert, L. H. Bender, M. Joerger","doi":"10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps5-08-16","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps5-08-16","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) poses significant challenges due to its aggressiveness, high relapse rate and mortality. Neoadjuvant immuno-chemotherapy (NAIC) is now a common treatment for early-stage TNBC before surgery. NAIC aims to eliminate viable cancer in the tumor, lymph nodes and possible occult distant metastases, shrink tumors to improve surgical outcomes and prevent disease recurrence. The Keynote-522 study revealed a 84.5% 3-year event-free survival in patients with early-stage TNBC using NAIC and improved pathological complete response (pCR) rates from 51.2% with neoadjuvant Chemotherapy to 64.8% with NAIC. A new potential method to improve clinical outcome and induce immune activation pre-surgery is through a novel local therapy in combination with NAIC that could cause increased apoptotic cell death and create personalized tumor antigens. Arnaout et al. conducted a randomized, phase 2 neoadjuvant window of opportunity trial using intratumoral (IT) INT230-6, a drug comprising vinblastine, cisplatin and a tumor dispersion and cell penetration enhancer molecule (SHAO), evaluating clinical and biological effects in women with early-stage operable BC (NCT04781725). Results in T2 to T4 tumors showed an average of over 30% necrosis in 74% of subjects at the time of surgery, with some patients having &gt;95% tumor necrosis following a single dose. Adding immune-activating and apoptotic induced necrosis caused by INT230-6 dosed prior to NAIC in TNBC patients has the potential to increase pCR. Methods: This is a randomized, open-label multicenter phase 2 clinical study to determine the clinical activity, safety, and tolerability of IT INT230-6 in patients with early-stage, operable TNBC in combination with NAIC (cohort A) or NAIC alone (cohort B). The INT230-6 dose is dependent on tumor size. The primary endpoint is pCR in the primary tumor (ypT0/Tis) and affected lymph nodes (ypN0). Key inclusion criteria include newly diagnosed, previously untreated, locally advanced non-metastatic TNBC stage cT1c N1-3 M0 or cT2-4c N0-3 M0. Multifocal and multicentric primary tumors are allowed. Patients must have measurable disease in the breast with at least one lesion with a diameter ≥1.5 cm visible in ultrasound and injectable. Patients are either male or female, age ≥ 18 years, ECOG performance status &lt;2, adequate bone marrow, hepatic and renal function. STATS: The sample size calculation for both cohorts is determined based on a single-stage phase II single-arm clinical trial design (A’Hern). Null hypothesis (H0): pCR rate ≤ 0.6, Alternative hypothesis (H1): pCR rate ≥ 0.8. Type I error: 10% (one-sided), Power: 80%. The duration for accrual, patient therapy and follow-up is 12, 8 and 36 months respectively. The sample size per cohort is 27 patients. The study is recruiting in Switzerland and France in up to 16 sites. Results: By July 2025 15 of 54 patients could be enrolled, completion of accrual is expected in 2026. Prel","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":"178 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146205169","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-17DOI: 10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps1-12-07
M. Oshi, M. Sugimori, K. Kawashima, A. Yamada, K. Narui, T. Ishikawa, K. Takabe
Background: TP53 mutation is a key driver of breast cancer. However, its clinical impact remains unclear. This study investigates the relationship between TP53 mutations and response to CDK 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in breast cancer using real-world data (RWD) from the C-CAT (Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics) cohort, with particular focus on age-related differences. The duration of treatment was used as a surrogate of unresponsiveness to treatment and progression of disease during treatment. Material and Methods: We used METABRIC data for initial survival analysis and performed Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) to identify pathway enriched in TP53-mutated ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancers. We also investigated the relationship of TP53 mutations and durations of CDK4/6i and ICI treatments in the C-CAT cohort, a database that includes clinical and genomic data of metastatic breast cancer patients from Japan. To evaluate treatment resistance in metastatic breast cancer, we used treatment duration as a clinical endpoint. The CCAT cohort was stratified by age into four groups: Adolescent and Yong Adults (AYA: 15-39 y.o.), perimenopausal (40-54 y.o.), menopausal (55-64 y.o.), and old (over 65 y.o.). Results: TP53 mutations were significantly associated with poor prognosis in ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer in the METABRIC cohort. GESA revealed that TP53-mutated tumors were enriched with pro-cancerous gene sets, particularly those related with cell proliferation and immune response, while TP53-wild type tumors enriched estrogen response gene sets. These findings led to investigating the impact of TP53 mutations on durations of CDK4/6i and ICI treatments. In the CCAT cohort. TP53 mutation was not associated with the duration ICI treatment. On the other hand, TP53 mutation was significantly associated with shorter duration of CDK4/6i treatment in entire ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer, but not in the patients who received CDK4/6i starting from late treatment phase. This trend was consistent across both Abemaciclib and Palbociclib, suggesting that TP53 mutations similarly affect treatment duration in both drugs. Further, AYA patients had the shortest treatment duration compared to the other age groups, with an earlier initiation of CDK4/6i treatment. The prevalence of TP53 mutation decreased with increasing age. When analyzing the impact of TP53 mutations by age group, TP53 mutation was significantly associated with shorter treatment duration in the perimenopausal, menopausal, and old groups, while no significant difference was found in the AYA group. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that TP53 mutation is associated with shorter duration of CDK4/6i treatment, particularly in the early stages, with similar trends observed for Abemaciclib and Palbociclib. These findings highlight the need for personalized treatment strategies based on TP53 mutation status. While the impact
背景:TP53突变是乳腺癌的关键驱动因素。然而,其临床影响尚不清楚。本研究利用来自C-CAT(癌症基因组学和高级治疗中心)队列的真实世界数据(RWD)研究了乳腺癌中TP53突变与cdk4 /6抑制剂(CDK4/6i)和免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)反应之间的关系,特别关注年龄相关差异。治疗时间作为治疗无反应和治疗期间疾病进展的替代指标。材料和方法:我们使用METABRIC数据进行初始生存分析,并进行基因集富集分析(GSEA)以确定tp53突变的er阳性/ her2阴性乳腺癌中富集的途径。我们还研究了C-CAT队列中TP53突变与CDK4/6i和ICI治疗持续时间的关系,该队列包括来自日本的转移性乳腺癌患者的临床和基因组数据。为了评估转移性乳腺癌的治疗耐药性,我们使用治疗时间作为临床终点。CCAT队列按年龄分为四组:青少年和年轻人(AYA: 15-39岁),围绝经期(40-54岁),绝经期(55-64岁)和老年人(65岁以上)。结果:在METABRIC队列中,TP53突变与er阳性/ her2阴性乳腺癌的不良预后显著相关。GESA发现,tp53突变型肿瘤富含促癌基因集,尤其是与细胞增殖和免疫应答相关的基因集,而tp53野生型肿瘤则富含雌激素应答基因集。这些发现导致研究TP53突变对CDK4/6i和ICI治疗持续时间的影响。在CCAT队列中。TP53突变与ICI治疗时间无关。另一方面,在整个er阳性/ her2阴性乳腺癌中,TP53突变与CDK4/6i治疗时间较短显著相关,但与从治疗后期开始接受CDK4/6i治疗的患者无关。这一趋势在Abemaciclib和Palbociclib中都是一致的,这表明TP53突变相似地影响了两种药物的治疗时间。此外,与其他年龄组相比,AYA患者的治疗持续时间最短,并且开始CDK4/6i治疗的时间更早。TP53突变的患病率随着年龄的增长而下降。在分析TP53突变对年龄组的影响时,TP53突变在围绝经期、绝经期和老年组与较短的治疗时间显著相关,而在AYA组中没有发现显著差异。结论:本研究表明TP53突变与CDK4/6i治疗时间缩短相关,特别是在早期,Abemaciclib和Palbociclib也有类似的趋势。这些发现强调了基于TP53突变状态的个性化治疗策略的必要性。虽然TP53突变对ICI治疗时间的影响不显著,但这表明其他因素可能影响ICI疗效。此外,应考虑针对年龄的治疗策略,因为TP53突变对治疗持续时间的影响因年龄组而异。引用格式:M. Oshi, M. Sugimori, K. Kawashima, A. Yamada, K. Narui, T. Ishikawa, K. TakabeTP53突变对er阳性/ her2阴性乳腺癌患者cdk4 /6抑制剂和免疫检查点抑制剂治疗时间的影响:来自现实世界数据的见解[摘要]。摘自:《2025年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集》;2025年12月9-12日;费城(PA): AACR;临床癌症杂志2026;32(4增刊):nr PS1-12-07。
{"title":"Abstract PS1-12-07: Impact of TP53 mutations on Treatment Duration with CDK 4/6 Inhibitors and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in ER-positive/HER2-negative Breast Cancer: Insights from Real-World Data","authors":"M. Oshi, M. Sugimori, K. Kawashima, A. Yamada, K. Narui, T. Ishikawa, K. Takabe","doi":"10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps1-12-07","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps1-12-07","url":null,"abstract":"Background: TP53 mutation is a key driver of breast cancer. However, its clinical impact remains unclear. This study investigates the relationship between TP53 mutations and response to CDK 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in breast cancer using real-world data (RWD) from the C-CAT (Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics) cohort, with particular focus on age-related differences. The duration of treatment was used as a surrogate of unresponsiveness to treatment and progression of disease during treatment. Material and Methods: We used METABRIC data for initial survival analysis and performed Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) to identify pathway enriched in TP53-mutated ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancers. We also investigated the relationship of TP53 mutations and durations of CDK4/6i and ICI treatments in the C-CAT cohort, a database that includes clinical and genomic data of metastatic breast cancer patients from Japan. To evaluate treatment resistance in metastatic breast cancer, we used treatment duration as a clinical endpoint. The CCAT cohort was stratified by age into four groups: Adolescent and Yong Adults (AYA: 15-39 y.o.), perimenopausal (40-54 y.o.), menopausal (55-64 y.o.), and old (over 65 y.o.). Results: TP53 mutations were significantly associated with poor prognosis in ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer in the METABRIC cohort. GESA revealed that TP53-mutated tumors were enriched with pro-cancerous gene sets, particularly those related with cell proliferation and immune response, while TP53-wild type tumors enriched estrogen response gene sets. These findings led to investigating the impact of TP53 mutations on durations of CDK4/6i and ICI treatments. In the CCAT cohort. TP53 mutation was not associated with the duration ICI treatment. On the other hand, TP53 mutation was significantly associated with shorter duration of CDK4/6i treatment in entire ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer, but not in the patients who received CDK4/6i starting from late treatment phase. This trend was consistent across both Abemaciclib and Palbociclib, suggesting that TP53 mutations similarly affect treatment duration in both drugs. Further, AYA patients had the shortest treatment duration compared to the other age groups, with an earlier initiation of CDK4/6i treatment. The prevalence of TP53 mutation decreased with increasing age. When analyzing the impact of TP53 mutations by age group, TP53 mutation was significantly associated with shorter treatment duration in the perimenopausal, menopausal, and old groups, while no significant difference was found in the AYA group. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that TP53 mutation is associated with shorter duration of CDK4/6i treatment, particularly in the early stages, with similar trends observed for Abemaciclib and Palbociclib. These findings highlight the need for personalized treatment strategies based on TP53 mutation status. While the impact ","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146205247","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-17DOI: 10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps3-09-06
J. Kim, S. Lee, S. Lee, I. Lee, J. Ahn, S. Park, S. Gwon, N. Son
Oncotype DX (ODX) and MammaPrint (MMP) are two widely adopted multigene assays used to guide adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative early breast cancer. Despite their similar clinical roles, ODX and MMP often produce discordant risk classifications. While head-to-head comparison in the same patient would be ideal, it is rarely feasible in practice due to cost, clinical utility, and reimbursement constraints. Therefore, we designed a pilot study to indirectly compare the predictive performance of ODX and MMP by applying a clinicopathologic model—the Tennessee nomogram—to matched cohorts of patients who received either test. A total of 2,542 patients who underwent ODX (n = 2,011) or MMP (n = 531) testing were retrospectively selected. Patients were matched 1:1 based on age and nodal status to control for key prognostic variables. Risk distribution was compared across both cohorts, followed by application of the Tennessee model to assess its predictive concordance with each assay’s reported risk classification. Model performance was evaluated using AUC, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). The proportion of patients classified as high-risk differed between the two cohorts (ODX: 12.22% (8.21 - 17.28), MMP: 33.94% (27.72-40.59). The Tennessee model showed an AUC of 85.57 (77.49-93.65) for predicting high-risk ODX results and 70.70 (63.32-78.08) for MMP. Specificity and NPV were 90.21%, 94.59% in the ODX cohort, compared to 89.04% and 73.45% in the MMP cohort. Our findings indicate that the Tennessee model aligns more closely with ODX, suggesting that each assay may capture distinct biological dimensions of tumor behavior. This study highlights the importance of understanding the limitations of multigene tests when used interchangeably and supports the development of cost-effective, data-driven prediction tools that integrate clinicopathologic variables. These pilot results lay the groundwork for future AI-based models capable of refining treatment stratification in early HR+/HER2− breast cancer. Citation Format: J. Kim, S. Lee, S. Lee, I. Lee, J. Ahn, S. Park, S. Gwon, N. Son. Comparative Predictive Utility of Oncotype DX and MammaPrint Using a Clinicopathologic Model in Matched HR+/HER2− Early Breast Cancer Cohorts: The BRAIN Study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl): nr PS3-09-06.
Oncotype DX (ODX)和MammaPrint (MMP)是两种广泛采用的多基因检测方法,用于指导激素受体阳性(HR+)、her2阴性早期乳腺癌患者的辅助化疗决策。尽管它们的临床作用相似,但ODX和MMP经常产生不一致的风险分类。虽然在同一患者中进行头对头比较是理想的,但由于成本、临床效用和报销限制,在实践中很少可行。因此,我们设计了一项初步研究,通过应用临床病理模型-田纳西nomogram -匹配接受两种测试的患者队列,间接比较ODX和MMP的预测性能。回顾性选择共2,542例接受ODX (n = 2011)或MMP (n = 531)检测的患者。患者根据年龄和淋巴结状态进行1:1的匹配,以控制关键的预后变量。比较两个队列的风险分布,然后应用田纳西模型评估其与每个分析报告的风险分类的预测一致性。通过AUC、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)评估模型性能。高危患者比例在两组间存在差异(ODX: 12.22% (8.21 - 17.28), MMP: 33.94%(27.72-40.59)。田纳西模型预测高危ODX结果的AUC为85.57(77.49 ~ 93.65),预测MMP结果的AUC为70.70(63.32 ~ 78.08)。ODX组特异性为90.21%,NPV为94.59%,而MMP组特异性为89.04%,NPV为73.45%。我们的研究结果表明,田纳西模型与ODX更接近,这表明每种分析方法都可以捕获肿瘤行为的不同生物学维度。这项研究强调了理解多基因检测在互换使用时的局限性的重要性,并支持开发具有成本效益的、数据驱动的、整合临床病理变量的预测工具。这些试点结果为未来基于人工智能的模型奠定了基础,这些模型能够改善早期HR+/HER2 -乳腺癌的治疗分层。引文格式:J. Kim, S. Lee, S. Lee, I. Lee, J. Ahn, S. Park, S. kwon, N. Son。Oncotype DX和MammaPrint在匹配的HR+/HER2−早期乳腺癌队列中使用临床病理模型的比较预测效用:脑研究[摘要]。摘自:《2025年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集》;2025年12月9-12日;费城(PA): AACR;临床癌症杂志2026;32(4增刊):nr PS3-09-06。
{"title":"Abstract PS3-09-06: Comparative Predictive Utility of Oncotype DX and MammaPrint Using a Clinicopathologic Model in Matched HR+/HER2− Early Breast Cancer Cohorts: The BRAIN Study","authors":"J. Kim, S. Lee, S. Lee, I. Lee, J. Ahn, S. Park, S. Gwon, N. Son","doi":"10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps3-09-06","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps3-09-06","url":null,"abstract":"Oncotype DX (ODX) and MammaPrint (MMP) are two widely adopted multigene assays used to guide adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative early breast cancer. Despite their similar clinical roles, ODX and MMP often produce discordant risk classifications. While head-to-head comparison in the same patient would be ideal, it is rarely feasible in practice due to cost, clinical utility, and reimbursement constraints. Therefore, we designed a pilot study to indirectly compare the predictive performance of ODX and MMP by applying a clinicopathologic model—the Tennessee nomogram—to matched cohorts of patients who received either test. A total of 2,542 patients who underwent ODX (n = 2,011) or MMP (n = 531) testing were retrospectively selected. Patients were matched 1:1 based on age and nodal status to control for key prognostic variables. Risk distribution was compared across both cohorts, followed by application of the Tennessee model to assess its predictive concordance with each assay’s reported risk classification. Model performance was evaluated using AUC, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). The proportion of patients classified as high-risk differed between the two cohorts (ODX: 12.22% (8.21 - 17.28), MMP: 33.94% (27.72-40.59). The Tennessee model showed an AUC of 85.57 (77.49-93.65) for predicting high-risk ODX results and 70.70 (63.32-78.08) for MMP. Specificity and NPV were 90.21%, 94.59% in the ODX cohort, compared to 89.04% and 73.45% in the MMP cohort. Our findings indicate that the Tennessee model aligns more closely with ODX, suggesting that each assay may capture distinct biological dimensions of tumor behavior. This study highlights the importance of understanding the limitations of multigene tests when used interchangeably and supports the development of cost-effective, data-driven prediction tools that integrate clinicopathologic variables. These pilot results lay the groundwork for future AI-based models capable of refining treatment stratification in early HR+/HER2− breast cancer. Citation Format: J. Kim, S. Lee, S. Lee, I. Lee, J. Ahn, S. Park, S. Gwon, N. Son. Comparative Predictive Utility of Oncotype DX and MammaPrint Using a Clinicopathologic Model in Matched HR+/HER2− Early Breast Cancer Cohorts: The BRAIN Study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl): nr PS3-09-06.","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146205251","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}