Circulation最新文献

Background: Microvascular angina is associated with dysregulation of the endothelin system and impairments in myocardial blood flow, exercise capacity, and health-related quality of life. The G allele of the noncoding single nucleotide polymorphism RS9349379 enhances expression of the endothelin-1 gene (EDN1) in human vascular cells, potentially increasing circulating concentrations of Endothelin-1 (ET-1). Whether zibotentan, an oral ET-A receptor selective antagonist, is efficacious and safe for the treatment of microvascular angina is unknown.

Methods: Patients with microvascular angina were enrolled in this double-blind, placebo-controlled, sequential crossover trial of zibotentan (10 mg daily for 12 weeks). The trial population was enriched to ensure a G allele frequency of 50% for the RS9349379 single nucleotide polymorphism. Participants and investigators were blinded to genotype. The primary outcome was treadmill exercise duration (seconds) using the Bruce protocol. The primary analysis estimated the mean within-participant difference in exercise duration after treatment with zibotentan versus placebo.

Results: A total of 118 participants (mean±SD; years of age 63.5 [9.2]; 71 [60.2%] females; 25 [21.2%] with diabetes) were randomized. Among 103 participants with complete data, the mean exercise duration with zibotentan treatment compared with placebo was not different (between-treatment difference, -4.26 seconds [95% CI, -19.60 to 11.06] P=0.5871). Secondary outcomes showed no improvement with zibotentan. Zibotentan reduced blood pressure and increased plasma concentrations of ET-1. Adverse events were more common with zibotentan (60.2%) compared with placebo (14.4%; P<0.001).

Conclusions: Among patients with microvascular angina, short-term treatment with a relatively high dose (10 mg daily) of zibotentan was not beneficial. Target-related adverse effects were common.

Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04097314.

Background: The real incidence of atrial arrhythmia (AA) after patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure and whether this complication can be prevented remain unknown. We assessed whether flecainide is effective to prevent AA during the first 3 months after PFO closure, and whether 6 months of treatment with flecainide is more effective than 3 months to prevent AA after PFO closure.

Methods: AFLOAT (Assessment of Flecainide to Lower the Patent Foramen Ovale Closure Risk of Atrial Fibrillation or Tachycardia Trial) is a prospective, multicentre, randomized, open-label, superiority trial with a blind evaluation of all the end points (PROBE [Prospective Randomized Open, Blinded End Point] design). Patients were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio after PFO closure to receive flecainide (150 mg once daily in a sustained-release dose) for 3 months, flecainide (150 mg once daily in a sustained-release dose) for 6 months, or no additional treatment (standard of care) for 6 months. The primary end point was the percentage of patients with at least 1 episode of AA (≥30 seconds) recorded within 3 months after PFO closure on long-term monitoring with an insertable cardiac monitor. The secondary end point was the percentage of patients with at least 1 episode of AA (≥30 seconds) recorded with insertable cardiac monitor during the 3- to 6-month period after PFO closure.

Results: A total of 186 patients were included (mean age, 54 years; 68.8% men) and AA (≥30 seconds) occurred in 53 patients (28.5%) during the 6-month follow-up; 86.8% of these AA events occurred in the first month after PFO closure. The primary outcome occurred in 33 of 123 (26.8%) and 16 of 63 (25.4%) patients receiving flecainide for at least 3 months or standard of care, respectively (risk difference, 1.4% [95% CI, -12.9% to 13.8%]; NS). The secondary end point occurred in 3 of 60 (5.0%), 4 of 63 (6.3%), and 5 of 63 (7.9%) patients receiving flecainide for 6 months, for 3 months, or standard of care, respectively (risk difference, -2.9% [95% CI, -12.7% to 6.9%], and risk difference, -1.6% [95% CI, -11.8% to 8.6%], respectively).

Conclusions: In the first 6 months after successful PFO closure, AA (≥30 seconds) occurred in 28.5% of cases, mostly in the first month after the procedure. Flecainide did not prevent AA after PFO closure.

Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT05213104.

Background: The optimal duration of anticoagulation therapy for patients with cancer and acute low-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) is clinically relevant, but evidence is lacking. Prolonged anticoagulation therapy could have a potential benefit for prevention of thrombotic events; however, it could also increase the risk of bleeding.

Methods: In a multicenter, open-label, adjudicator-blinded, randomized clinical trial at 32 institutions in Japan, we randomly assigned patients with cancer and acute low-risk PE of the simplified version of the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index score of 1, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive either an 18-month or a 6-month rivaroxaban treatment. The primary end point was recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) at 18 months. The major secondary end point was major bleeding at 18 months according to the criteria of the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis. The primary hypothesis was that an 18-month treatment was superior to a 6-month treatment in terms of the primary end point.

Results: From February 2021 to March 2023, 179 patients were randomized, and after the exclusion of one patient who withdrew consent, 178 were included in the intention-to-treat population: 89 patients in the 18-month rivaroxaban group and 89 in the 6-month rivaroxaban group. The mean age was 65.7 years; 47% of the patients were men, and 12% had symptoms of PE at baseline. The primary end point of recurrent VTE occurred in 5 of the 89 patients (5.6%) in the 18-month rivaroxaban group and in 17 of the 89 (19.1%) in the 6-month rivaroxaban group (odds ratio, 0.25 [95% CI, 0.09-0.72]; P=0.01). Among 22 recurrent VTE, 5 patients presented with a symptomatic recurrent VTE; recurrent PE occurred in 11 patients, including 2 with main and 4 with lobar PEs; and recurrent deep vein thrombosis was seen in 11 patients, including 3 with proximal deep vein thromboses. The major secondary end point of major bleeding occurred in 7 of the 89 patients (7.8 %) in the 18-month rivaroxaban group and in 5 of the 89 patients (5.6%) in the 6-month rivaroxaban group (odds ratio, 1.43 [95% CI, 0.44-4.70]; P=0.55).

Conclusions: In patients with cancer and acute low-risk PE of the simplified version of the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index score of 1, the 18-month rivaroxaban treatment was superior to the 6-month rivaroxaban treatment with respect to recurrent VTE events.

Background: Patients with heart failure, a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), and obesity have significant disability and suffer frequent exacerbations of heart failure. We hypothesized that tirzepatide, a long-acting agonist of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptors, would improve a comprehensive suite of clinical endpoints, including measures of health status, functional capacity, quality of life, exercise tolerance, patient well-being, and medication burden in these patients.

Methods: 731 patients in class II-IV heart failure, ejection fraction ≥50%, and body mass index ≥30 kg/m² were randomized(double-blind) to tirzepatide(titrated up to 15mg subcutaneously weekly)(n=364) or placebo(n=367), added to background therapy for a median of 104 weeks (Q1=66, Q3=126 weeks).

Primary endpoints: tirzepatide reduced the combined risk of cardiovascular death or worsening heart failure and improved Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score(KCCQ-CSS). The current expanded analysis included sensitivity analyses of the primary endpoints, 6-minute walk distance(6MWD), EQ-5D-5L health state index, Patient Global Impression of Severity Overall Health(PGIS), NYHA class, use of heart failure medications, and a hierarchical composite based on all-cause death, worsening heart failure, and 52-week changes in KCCQ-CSS and 6MWD.

Results: Patients were aged 65.2±10.7, 53.8%(n=393) were female; BMI 38.2±6.7kg/m², KCCQ-CSS 53.5±18.5, 6MWD 302.8±81.7meters, and 53%(n=388) had a worsening heart failure event in the prior 12 months. Compared with placebo, tirzepatide produced a consistent beneficial effect across all composites of death and worsening heart failure events, analyzed as time-to-first-event (hazard ratios 0.41-0.67). At 52 weeks, tirzepatide increased KCCQ-CSS 6.9 points (95%CI, 3.3, 10.6, P<0.001), 6MWD 18.3 meters (95%CI, 9.9, 26.7, P<0.001) and EQ-5D-5L 0.06 (95%CI, 0.03, 0.09, P<0.001). The tirzepatide group shifted to a more favorable PGIS (proportional odds ratio 1.99 (95%CI, 1.44, 2.76) and NYHA class (proportional odds ratio 2.26 (95%CI, 1.54, 3.31), both P<0.001 and required less heart failure medications (P=0.015). The broad spectrum of effects was reflected in benefits on the hierarchical composite (win ratio 1.63, 95%CI, 1.17, 2.28;P=0.004).

Conclusions: Tirzepatide produced a comprehensive, meaningful improvement in heart failure across multiple complementary domains; enhanced health status, quality of life, functional capacity, exercise tolerance and well-being; and reduced symptoms and medication burden in patients with HFpEF and obesity.

Background: In the phase 3 randomized controlled study, ATTRibute-CM, acoramidis, a transthyretin (TTR) stabilizer, demonstrated significant efficacy on the primary endpoint. Participants with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) who completed ATTRibute-CM were invited to enroll in an open-label extension study (OLE). We report efficacy and safety data of acoramidis in participants who completed ATTRibute-CM and enrolled in the ongoing OLE.

Methods: Participants who previously received acoramidis through Month 30 (M30) in ATTRibute-CM continued to receive it (continuous acoramidis), and those who received placebo through M30 were switched to acoramidis (placebo to acoramidis). Participants who received concomitant tafamidis in ATTRibute-CM were required to discontinue it to be eligible to enroll in the OLE. Clinical efficacy outcomes analyzed through Month 42 (M42) included time to event for all-cause mortality (ACM) or first cardiovascular-related hospitalization (CVH), ACM alone, first CVH alone, ACM or recurrent CVH, change from baseline in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), serum TTR, and the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary score (KCCQ-OS). Safety outcomes were analyzed through M42.

Results: Overall, 438 of 632 participants in ATTRibute-CM completed treatment and 389 enrolled in the ongoing OLE (263 continuous acoramidis, 126 placebo to acoramidis). The hazard ratio (HR) (95% CI) for ACM or first CVH was 0.57 (0.46, 0.72) at M42 based on a stratified Cox proportional hazards model (P-value < 0.0001) favoring continuous acoramidis. Similar analyses were performed on ACM alone and first CVH alone, with HRs (95% CI) of 0.64 (0.47, 0.88) and 0.53 (0.41, 0.69), respectively, at M42. Treatment effects for NT-proBNP and 6MWD also favored continuous acoramidis. Upon initiation of open-label acoramidis in the placebo-to-acoramidis arm there was a prompt increase in serum TTR. Quality of life assessed by KCCQ-OS was well preserved in continuous acoramidis participants compared with the placebo to acoramidis participants. No new clinically important safety issues were identified in this long-term evaluation.

Conclusions: Early initiation and continuous use of acoramidis in the ATTRibute-CM study through M42 of the ongoing OLE study was associated with sustained clinical benefits in a contemporary ATTR-CM cohort, with no clinically important safety issues newly identified.