Pub Date : 2024-04-18DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100780
L. Melerowitz , S. Sreenivasa , M. Nachbar , A. Stsefanenka , M. Beck , C. Senger , N. Predescu , S. Ullah Akram , V. Budach , D. Zips , M. Heiland , S. Nahles , C. Stromberger
Background
Current segmentation approaches for radiation treatment planning in head and neck cancer patients (HNCP) typically consider the entire mandible as an organ at risk, whereas segmentation of the maxilla remains uncommon. Accurate risk assessment for osteoradionecrosis (ORN) or implant-based dental rehabilitation after radiation therapy may require a nuanced analysis of dose distribution in specific mandibular and maxillary segments. Manual segmentation is time-consuming and inconsistent, and there is no definition of jaw subsections.
Materials and methods
The mandible and maxilla were divided into 12 substructures. The model was developed from 82 computed tomography (CT) scans of HNCP and adopts an encoder-decoder three-dimensional (3D) U-Net structure. The efficiency and accuracy of the automated method were compared against manual segmentation on an additional set of 20 independent CT scans. The evaluation metrics used were the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), 95% Hausdorff distance (HD95), and surface DSC (sDSC).
Results
Automated segmentations were performed in a median of 86 s, compared to manual segmentations, which took a median of 53.5 min. The median DSC per substructure ranged from 0.81 to 0.91, and the median HD95 ranged from 1.61 to 4.22. The number of artifacts did not affect these scores. The maxillary substructures showed lower metrics than the mandibular substructures.
Conclusions
The jaw substructure segmentation demonstrated high accuracy, time efficiency, and promising results in CT scans with and without metal artifacts. This novel model could provide further investigation into dose relationships with ORN or dental implant failure in normal tissue complication prediction models.
{"title":"Design and evaluation of a deep learning-based automatic segmentation of maxillary and mandibular substructures using a 3D U-Net","authors":"L. Melerowitz , S. Sreenivasa , M. Nachbar , A. Stsefanenka , M. Beck , C. Senger , N. Predescu , S. Ullah Akram , V. Budach , D. Zips , M. Heiland , S. Nahles , C. Stromberger","doi":"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100780","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100780","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Current segmentation approaches for radiation treatment planning in head and neck cancer patients (HNCP) typically consider the entire mandible as an organ at risk, whereas segmentation of the maxilla remains uncommon. Accurate risk assessment for osteoradionecrosis (ORN) or implant-based dental rehabilitation after radiation therapy may require a nuanced analysis of dose distribution in specific mandibular and maxillary segments. Manual segmentation is time-consuming and inconsistent, and there is no definition of jaw subsections.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>The mandible and maxilla were divided into 12 substructures. The model was developed from 82 computed tomography (CT) scans of HNCP and adopts an encoder-decoder three-dimensional (3D) U-Net structure. The efficiency and accuracy of the automated method were compared against manual segmentation on an additional set of 20 independent CT scans. The evaluation metrics used were the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), 95% Hausdorff distance (HD95), and surface DSC (sDSC).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Automated segmentations were performed in a median of 86 s, compared to manual segmentations, which took a median of 53.5 min. The median DSC per substructure ranged from 0.81 to 0.91, and the median HD95 ranged from 1.61 to 4.22. The number of artifacts did not affect these scores. The maxillary substructures showed lower metrics than the mandibular substructures.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The jaw substructure segmentation demonstrated high accuracy, time efficiency, and promising results in CT scans with and without metal artifacts. This novel model could provide further investigation into dose relationships with ORN or dental implant failure in normal tissue complication prediction models.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10342,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824000570/pdfft?md5=d76ae4c5033a1b5a71b961c2af0f93cb&pid=1-s2.0-S2405630824000570-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140768243","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-18DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100779
Maxime Galienne , Séverine Risbourg , Thomas Lacornerie , Alexandre Taillez , Eric Lartigau , Maël Barthoulot , David Pasquier
Background and purpose
Extreme hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a therapeutic alternative for localized low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Despite the availability of several studies, the toxicity profile of SBRT has not been comprehensively described. This real-world evidence study assessed the efficacy and toxicities associated with this regimen, and potential prognosis factors for genitourinary toxicities.
Materials and methods
This retrospective study included 141 consecutive patients with localized prostatic adenocarcinoma treated with CyberKnife™ SBRT, as primary irradiation, at the Oscar Lambret Center between 2010 and 2020. The prescribed dose was 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions. Acute and late toxicities were graded according to the CTCAE (version 5.0). Biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. The cumulative incidence of biochemical recurrence (cBR) was estimated using the Kalbfleisch–Prentice method.
Results
Among the included patients, 13.5 % had a history of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). The median follow-up was 48 months. At 5 years, bRFS, cBR, and OS were 72 % (95 %CI: 61–81), 7 % (95 %CI: 3–14), and 82 % (95 %CI: 73–89), respectively. Twenty-nine patients experienced at least one late toxicity of grade ≥ 2; genitourinary (N = 29), including 3 cases of chronic hematuria, and/or gastrointestinal (N = 1). The cumulative incidence of late urinary toxicity of grade ≥ 2 was 20.6 % at 5 years (95 %CI: 13.9–28.1). Multivariate analysis revealed that a history of TURP was significantly associated with late urinary toxicity of grade ≥ 2, after adjusting for clinical target volume (Odds Ratio = 3.06; 95%CI: 1.05–8.86; P = 0.04).
Conclusion
Extreme hypofractionated SBRT is effective for localized prostate cancer with a low risk of late toxicity. A history of TURP is associated with a higher risk of late urinary toxicity. These findings may contribute to the optimal management of patients treated with this regimen, particularly those with a history of TURP.
背景和目的极低分量立体定向体放射治疗(SBRT)是局部低危或中危前列腺癌的一种治疗方法。尽管已有多项研究,但尚未对 SBRT 的毒性进行全面描述。这项真实世界证据研究评估了该方案的疗效和相关毒性,以及泌尿生殖系统毒性的潜在预后因素。材料与方法这项回顾性研究纳入了2010年至2020年期间在奥斯卡-兰布雷特中心接受赛博刀™SBRT治疗的141例连续性局部前列腺腺癌患者。规定剂量为36.25 Gy,分5次进行。急性和晚期毒性根据CTCAE(5.0版)进行分级。无生化复发生存期(bRFS)和总生存期(OS)采用卡普兰-梅耶法估算。采用Kalbfleisch-Prentice方法估算生化复发的累积发生率(cBR)。中位随访时间为 48 个月。5年后,bRFS、cBR和OS分别为72%(95%CI:61-81)、7%(95%CI:3-14)和82%(95%CI:73-89)。29名患者至少出现过一次≥2级的晚期毒性;泌尿生殖系统(29例),包括3例慢性血尿,和/或胃肠道(1例)。晚期泌尿系统毒性≥2级的累积发生率在5年内为20.6%(95%CI:13.9-28.1)。多变量分析显示,在调整临床靶体积后,TURP史与晚期泌尿系统毒性≥2级显著相关(Odds Ratio = 3.06; 95%CI: 1.05-8.86; P = 0.04)。有TURP病史的患者发生晚期泌尿系统毒性的风险较高。这些发现可能有助于对接受该方案治疗的患者,尤其是有TURP病史的患者进行优化管理。
{"title":"Extreme hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for localized prostate Cancer: Efficacy and late urinary toxicity according to transurethral resection of the prostate history","authors":"Maxime Galienne , Séverine Risbourg , Thomas Lacornerie , Alexandre Taillez , Eric Lartigau , Maël Barthoulot , David Pasquier","doi":"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100779","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100779","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><p>Extreme hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a therapeutic alternative for localized low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Despite the availability of several studies, the toxicity profile of SBRT has not been comprehensively described. This real-world evidence study assessed the efficacy and toxicities associated with this regimen, and potential prognosis factors for genitourinary toxicities.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>This retrospective study included 141 consecutive patients with localized prostatic adenocarcinoma treated with CyberKnife™ SBRT, as primary irradiation, at the Oscar Lambret Center between 2010 and 2020. The prescribed dose was 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions. Acute and late toxicities were graded according to the CTCAE (version 5.0). Biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. The cumulative incidence of biochemical recurrence (cBR) was estimated using the Kalbfleisch–Prentice method.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among the included patients, 13.5 % had a history of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). The median follow-up was 48 months. At 5 years, bRFS, cBR, and OS were 72 % (95 %CI: 61–81), 7 % (95 %CI: 3–14), and 82 % (95 %CI: 73–89), respectively. Twenty-nine patients experienced at least one late toxicity of grade ≥ 2; genitourinary (N = 29), including 3 cases of chronic hematuria, and/or gastrointestinal (N = 1). The cumulative incidence of late urinary toxicity of grade ≥ 2 was 20.6 % at 5 years (95 %CI: 13.9–28.1). Multivariate analysis revealed that a history of TURP was significantly associated with late urinary toxicity of grade ≥ 2, after adjusting for clinical target volume (Odds Ratio = 3.06; 95%CI: 1.05–8.86; <em>P</em> = 0.04).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Extreme hypofractionated SBRT is effective for localized prostate cancer with a low risk of late toxicity. A history of TURP is associated with a higher risk of late urinary toxicity. These findings may contribute to the optimal management of patients treated with this regimen, particularly those with a history of TURP.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10342,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824000569/pdfft?md5=39baf19c7b3aac086f210efa7890bdd8&pid=1-s2.0-S2405630824000569-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140619424","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
To assess feasibility, toxicity and outcome of moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy concomitant to capecitabine after induction chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer.
Materials and methods
Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer without distant progression after induction chemotherapy (CHT) were considered. Radiochemotherapy (RCT) consisted of 44.25 Gy in 15 fractions to the tumor and involved lymph-nodes concomitant to capecitabine 1250 mg/m2/day. Feasibility and toxicity were evaluated in all pts. Overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), distant PFS (DPFS) and local PFS (LPFS) were assessed only in stage III patients.
Results
254 patients, 220 stage III, 34 stage IV, were treated. Median follow up was 19 months. Induction CHT consisted of Gemcitabine (35 patients), or drug combination (219 patients); median duration was 6 months.
Four patients (1.6 %) did not complete RT (1 early progression, 3 toxicity), median duration of RT was 20 days, 209 patients (82 %) received ≥ 75 % of capecitabine dose.
During RCT G3 gastrointestinal toxicity occurred in 3.2% of patients, G3-G4 hematologic toxicity in 5.4% of patients. Subsequently, G3, G4, G5 gastric or duodenal lesions occurred in 10 (4%), 2 (0.8%) and 1 patients (0.4%), respectively.
Median PFS, LPFS, and DPFS were 11.9 months (95 % CI:11.4–13), 16 months (95 % CI:14.2–17.3) and 14.0 months (95 % CI:12.6–146.5), respectively.
Median OS was 19.5 months (95 % CL:18.1–21.3). One- and two-year survival were 85.2 % and 36 %, respectively.
Conclusions
The present schedule of hypofractionated RT after induction CHT is feasible with acceptable toxicity rate and provides an outcome comparable with that achievable with standard doses and fractionation.
{"title":"Hypofractionated radiotherapy concomitant to capecitabine after induction chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma","authors":"Paolo Passoni , Michele Reni , Sara Broggi , Najla Slim , Andrei Fodor , Marina Macchini , Giulia Orsi , Umberto Peretti , Gianpaolo Balzano , Domenico Tamburrino , Giulio Belfiori , Stefano Cascinu , Massimo Falconi , Claudio Fiorino , Nadia Di Muzio","doi":"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100778","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100778","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><p>To assess feasibility, toxicity and outcome of moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy concomitant to capecitabine after induction chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer without distant progression after induction chemotherapy (CHT) were considered. Radiochemotherapy (RCT) consisted of 44.25 Gy in 15 fractions to the tumor and involved lymph-nodes concomitant to capecitabine 1250 mg/m<sup>2</sup>/day. Feasibility and toxicity were evaluated in all pts. Overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), distant PFS (DPFS) and local PFS (LPFS) were assessed only in stage III patients.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>254 patients, 220 stage III, 34 stage IV, were treated. Median follow up was 19 months. Induction CHT consisted of Gemcitabine (35 patients), or drug combination (219 patients); median duration was 6 months.</p><p>Four patients (1.6 %) did not complete RT (1 early progression, 3 toxicity), median duration of RT was 20 days, 209 patients (82 %) received ≥ 75 % of capecitabine dose.</p><p>During RCT G3 gastrointestinal toxicity occurred in 3.2% of patients, G3-G4 hematologic toxicity in 5.4% of patients. Subsequently, G3, G4, G5 gastric or duodenal lesions occurred in 10 (4%), 2 (0.8%) and 1 patients (0.4%), respectively.</p><p>Median PFS, LPFS, and DPFS were 11.9 months (95 % CI:11.4–13), 16 months (95 % CI:14.2–17.3) and 14.0 months (95 % CI:12.6–146.5), respectively.</p><p>Median OS was 19.5 months (95 % CL:18.1–21.3). One- and two-year survival were 85.2 % and 36 %, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The present schedule of hypofractionated RT after induction CHT is feasible with acceptable toxicity rate and provides an outcome comparable with that achievable with standard doses and fractionation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10342,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824000557/pdfft?md5=7b8b9456a3b2b6442c4220386c25f7ce&pid=1-s2.0-S2405630824000557-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140918079","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-06DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100777
Julie Savagner , Anne Ducassou , Bastien Cabarrou , Gregory Hangard , Marion Gambart , Anne-Isabelle Bertozzi , Eloise Baudou , Sergio Boetto , Delphine Larrieu , Anne Laprie
Objective
As craniospinal irradiation (CSI) is delivered more frequently by helical tomotherapy (HT) with few reports about late effects, we analysed all patients treated in our centre over an 11-year period.
Methods and materials
Our study included all patients that underwent CSI by HT, between September 2009 and January 2020, in the Department of Radiation Oncology of the Toulouse Cancer Institute. Acute radiotherapy toxicities were reported and medium- to long-term outcomes analysed.
Results
Among the 79 patients included, 70.9 % were younger than 18 years at diagnosis, the median age was 13 (range: 1–52) at the time of radiation therapy, 67.1 % of patients had medulloblastoma. Half of them (49.4 %) had a metastatic disease at diagnosis. The median dose of CSI was 36 Gy (range, 18–36). Seventy-seven patients received a radiation boost to the original location of the primary tumour (97.5 %), 32 patients also received a boost to their metastatic sites (40.5 %). Median follow-up was 55.5 months (95 %CI = [41.2; 71.8]). The 3-year event-free survival rate was 66.3 % (95 %CI = [54.2; 75.9]). Most patients presented with acute haematological toxicities during CSI (85.9 %), predominantly severe thrombocytopenia (39.7 %). Among the 64 patients assessed for medium- and long-term outcomes, 52 survived and 47 were alive and disease-free at the latest follow-up visit on record. There were 3.8 % secondary tumours: two meningiomas and one diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma. Adult and paediatric patients respectively presented with secondary cataract (4.3 % vs 22.0 %), persistent hearing disorders (26.1 % vs 29.3 %), pulmonary or cardiac late effects (4.3 % vs 2.4 %), hormonal pituitary gland deficiencies (30.0 % vs 56.8 %) and psycho-cognitive disorders (56.5 % vs 53.7 %).
Conclusion
CSI dispensed by HT, did not result in any additional acute or late toxicities when compared to 3D-CSI. There was no increase in the secondary tumour rate compared to that reported in the literature.
{"title":"Helical tomotherapy craniospinal irradiation in primary brain tumours: Toxicities and outcomes in a peadiatric and adult population","authors":"Julie Savagner , Anne Ducassou , Bastien Cabarrou , Gregory Hangard , Marion Gambart , Anne-Isabelle Bertozzi , Eloise Baudou , Sergio Boetto , Delphine Larrieu , Anne Laprie","doi":"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100777","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100777","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>As craniospinal irradiation (CSI) is delivered more frequently by helical tomotherapy (HT) with few reports about late effects, we analysed all patients treated in our centre over an 11-year period.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and materials</h3><p>Our study included all patients that underwent CSI by HT, between September 2009 and January 2020, in the Department of Radiation Oncology of the Toulouse Cancer Institute. Acute radiotherapy toxicities were reported and medium- to long-term outcomes analysed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among the 79 patients included, 70.9 % were younger than 18 years at diagnosis, the median age was 13 (range: 1–52) at the time of radiation therapy, 67.1 % of patients had medulloblastoma. Half of them (49.4 %) had a metastatic disease at diagnosis. The median dose of CSI was 36 Gy (range, 18–36). Seventy-seven patients received a radiation boost to the original location of the primary tumour (97.5 %), 32 patients also received a boost to their metastatic sites (40.5 %). Median follow-up was 55.5 months (95 %CI = [41.2; 71.8]). The 3-year event-free survival rate was 66.3 % (95 %CI = [54.2; 75.9]). Most patients presented with acute haematological toxicities during CSI (85.9 %), predominantly severe thrombocytopenia (39.7 %). Among the 64 patients assessed for medium- and long-term outcomes, 52 survived and 47 were alive and disease-free at the latest follow-up visit on record. There were 3.8 % secondary tumours: two meningiomas and one diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma. Adult and paediatric patients respectively presented with secondary cataract (4.3 % vs 22.0 %), persistent hearing disorders (26.1 % vs 29.3 %), pulmonary or cardiac late effects (4.3 % vs 2.4 %), hormonal pituitary gland deficiencies (30.0 % vs 56.8 %) and psycho-cognitive disorders (56.5 % vs 53.7 %).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>CSI dispensed by HT, did not result in any additional acute or late toxicities when compared to 3D-CSI. There was no increase in the secondary tumour rate compared to that reported in the literature.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10342,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824000545/pdfft?md5=e5708e002c6896a8fecef3ed63894b2f&pid=1-s2.0-S2405630824000545-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140543415","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-05DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100776
Michael Sunmin Kim , Derek Roger Wilke
This is a response to the letter to the editor from Dr. Ali et al. from Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
这是对巴基斯坦卡拉奇阿迦汗大学阿里博士等人写给编辑的信的回复。
{"title":"Letter to the editor: Reply to Ali et al.","authors":"Michael Sunmin Kim , Derek Roger Wilke","doi":"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100776","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100776","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This is a response to the letter to the editor from Dr. Ali et al. from Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10342,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824000533/pdfft?md5=2cfa07985392c2f07b625f419a9c5b19&pid=1-s2.0-S2405630824000533-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140552652","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-31DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100775
Tooba Ali, Mariam Hina, Laraib Khan, Bilal Mazhar Qureshi, Asim Hafiz, Ahmed Nadeem Abbasi
{"title":"In regard to Kim et al","authors":"Tooba Ali, Mariam Hina, Laraib Khan, Bilal Mazhar Qureshi, Asim Hafiz, Ahmed Nadeem Abbasi","doi":"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100775","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100775","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10342,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824000521/pdfft?md5=d5261df76ce06b7f81a2a5dbb922f889&pid=1-s2.0-S2405630824000521-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140338640","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-30DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100772
Morten Horsholt Kristensen , Anne Ivalu Sander Holm , Christian Rønn Hansen , Ruta Zukauskaite , Eva Samsøe , Christian Maare , Jørgen Johansen , Hanne Primdahl , Åse Bratland , Claus Andrup Kristensen , Maria Andersen , Jens Overgaard , Jesper Grau Eriksen
Introduction
Patients with failure after primary radiotherapy (RT) for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) have a poor prognosis. This study investigates pattern of failure after primary curatively intended IMRT in a randomized controlled trial in relation to HPV/p16 status.
Material and methods
Patients with HNSCC of the oral cavity, oropharynx (OPSCC), hypopharynx or larynx were treated with primary curative IMRT (+/-cisplatin) and concomitant nimorazole between 2007 and 12. Of 608 patients, 151 had loco-regional failure within five years, from whom 130 pairs of scans (planning-CT and diagnostic failure scan) were collected and deformably co-registered. Point of origin-based pattern of failure analysis was conducted, including distance to CTV1 and GTV, and estimated dose coverage of the point of origin.
Results
Of 130 patients with pairs of scans, 104 (80 %) had at least one local or regional failure site covered by 95 % of prescribed dose and 87 (67 %) of the failures had point of origin within the high-dose CTV (CTV1). Of failures from primary p16 + OPSCC, the majority of both mucosal (84 %) and nodal (61 %) failures were covered by curative doses. For p16− tumors (oral cavity, OPSCC p16neg, hypopharynx and larynx), 75 % of mucosal and 66 % of nodal failures were high-dose failures.
Conclusion
Radioresistance is the primary cause of failure after RT for HNSCC irrespective of HPV/p16 status. Thus, focus on predictors for the response to RT is warranted to identify patients with higher risk of high-dose failure that might benefit from intensified treatment regimens.
{"title":"High-dose loco-regional pattern of failure after primary radiotherapy in p16 positive and negative head and neck squamous cell carcinoma – A DAHANCA 19 study","authors":"Morten Horsholt Kristensen , Anne Ivalu Sander Holm , Christian Rønn Hansen , Ruta Zukauskaite , Eva Samsøe , Christian Maare , Jørgen Johansen , Hanne Primdahl , Åse Bratland , Claus Andrup Kristensen , Maria Andersen , Jens Overgaard , Jesper Grau Eriksen","doi":"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100772","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100772","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Patients with failure after primary radiotherapy (RT) for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) have a poor prognosis. This study investigates pattern of failure after primary curatively intended IMRT in a randomized controlled trial in relation to HPV/p16 status.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>Patients with HNSCC of the oral cavity, oropharynx (OPSCC), hypopharynx or larynx were treated with primary curative IMRT (+/-cisplatin) and concomitant nimorazole between 2007 and 12. Of 608 patients, 151 had loco-regional failure within five years, from whom 130 pairs of scans (planning-CT and diagnostic failure scan) were collected and deformably co-registered. Point of origin-based pattern of failure analysis was conducted, including distance to CTV1 and GTV, and estimated dose coverage of the point of origin.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 130 patients with pairs of scans, 104 (80 %) had at least one local or regional failure site covered by 95 % of prescribed dose and 87 (67 %) of the failures had point of origin within the high-dose CTV (CTV1). Of failures from primary p16 + OPSCC, the majority of both mucosal (84 %) and nodal (61 %) failures were covered by curative doses. For p16− tumors (oral cavity, OPSCC p16neg, hypopharynx and larynx), 75 % of mucosal and 66 % of nodal failures were high-dose failures.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Radioresistance is the primary cause of failure after RT for HNSCC irrespective of HPV/p16 status. Thus, focus on predictors for the response to RT is warranted to identify patients with higher risk of high-dose failure that might benefit from intensified treatment regimens.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10342,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824000491/pdfft?md5=0a9b76ed240b5186588f0a3e1afd049c&pid=1-s2.0-S2405630824000491-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140343879","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-30DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100774
Federico Gagliardi , Anna Russo , Camila Scharf , Alessandro Pinto , Mario Faenza , Emma D'Ippolito , Giuseppe Argenziano , Teresa Troiani , Alfonso Reginelli , Valerio Nardone
This series introduces the clinical management of difficult-to-treat non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) through a multidisciplinary approach, emphasizing the integration of dermoscopy and Ultra high-frequency ultrasound (UHFUS) for accurate diagnosis and treatment planning, particularly in cases referred for radiotherapy (RT). Dermoscopy aids in diagnosing both pigmented and non-pigmented skin lesions, guiding treatment margins and reducing the benign-to-malignant biopsy ratio. UHFUS provides valuable insights into tumor size, depth, and vascularity, complementing clinical evaluations and assisting in RT planning. Three challenging cases are presented, highlighting the pivotal role of dermoscopy and UHFUS in decision-making and treatment optimization. Collaboration between dermatologists, radiation oncologists, and radiologists enhances diagnostic accuracy, tailoring treatment plans to individual patient needs and preferences, ultimately improving patient outcomes and experience. The integration of these imaging techniques holds promise for optimizing non-surgical treatments like RT and monitoring treatment progress, offering a personalized approach to NMSC management.
{"title":"All for one: Collaboration between dermatologist, radiation oncologist and radiologist in the clinical management of “difficult to treat” non melanoma skin cancer","authors":"Federico Gagliardi , Anna Russo , Camila Scharf , Alessandro Pinto , Mario Faenza , Emma D'Ippolito , Giuseppe Argenziano , Teresa Troiani , Alfonso Reginelli , Valerio Nardone","doi":"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100774","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100774","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This series introduces the clinical management of difficult-to-treat non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) through a multidisciplinary approach, emphasizing the integration of dermoscopy and Ultra high-frequency ultrasound (UHFUS) for accurate diagnosis and treatment planning, particularly in cases referred for radiotherapy (RT). Dermoscopy aids in diagnosing both pigmented and non-pigmented skin lesions, guiding treatment margins and reducing the benign-to-malignant biopsy ratio. UHFUS provides valuable insights into tumor size, depth, and vascularity, complementing clinical evaluations and assisting in RT planning. Three challenging cases are presented, highlighting the pivotal role of dermoscopy and UHFUS in decision-making and treatment optimization. Collaboration between dermatologists, radiation oncologists, and radiologists enhances diagnostic accuracy, tailoring treatment plans to individual patient needs and preferences, ultimately improving patient outcomes and experience. The integration of these imaging techniques holds promise for optimizing non-surgical treatments like RT and monitoring treatment progress, offering a personalized approach to NMSC management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10342,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240563082400051X/pdfft?md5=6c1ce42e44074c64dc3659b832ba8b67&pid=1-s2.0-S240563082400051X-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140338639","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-30DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100773
Wonguen Jung , Jin Chung , Jihae Lee , Kyubo Kim
Purpose
To assess radiation-induced fibrosis (RIF) using shear-wave elastography (SWE) in patients with breast cancer who received radiotherapy (RT) after breast conserving surgery.
Methods
Forty-one patients were enrolled in a prospective study before RT. SWE and B-mode ultrasonography were performed to measure elasticity. For quantitative measurement, the maximum elasticity value was measured in the tumor bed and non-tumor bed of the treated breast, and contralateral breast before RT and at 3, and 12 months after RT. and RIF was recorded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0.
Results
The mean ± standard deviation elasticity values for the tumor bed, non-tumor bed, and contralateral breast were 71.2 ± 74.9 kPa, 19.4 ± 9.8 kPa and 20.3 ± 10.0 kPa before RT; 28.7 ± 26.3 kPa, 15.1 ± 7.0 kPa, and 14.7 ± 6.3 kPa at 12 months after RT, respectively. The elasticity values for all three measurement areas before and 12 months after RT were significantly different (p < 0.001 for tumor bed, p = 0.002 for non-tumor bed, p = 0.001 for contralateral breast). At 12 months follow-up, the distribution of grades of RIF evaluated by CTCAE grade was grade 0 in 43.9 %, grade 1 in 48.8 %, and grade 2 in 7.3 %.
Conclusion
We demonstrated that SWE enables the evaluation of tissue stiffness to provide quantified information for the RIF of breast cancer. Further studies with long-term follow-up should provide more quantitative data.
{"title":"Quantifying radiation-induced breast fibrosis by shear-wave elastography in patients with breast cancer: A 12-months-follow-up data of a prospective study","authors":"Wonguen Jung , Jin Chung , Jihae Lee , Kyubo Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100773","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100773","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To assess radiation-induced fibrosis (RIF) using shear-wave elastography (SWE) in patients with breast cancer who received radiotherapy (RT) after breast conserving surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Forty-one patients were enrolled in a prospective study before RT. SWE and B-mode ultrasonography were performed to measure elasticity. For quantitative measurement, the maximum elasticity value was measured in the tumor bed and non-tumor bed of the treated breast, and contralateral breast before RT and at 3, and 12 months after RT. and RIF was recorded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean ± standard deviation elasticity values for the tumor bed, non-tumor bed, and contralateral breast were 71.2 ± 74.9 kPa, 19.4 ± 9.8 kPa and 20.3 ± 10.0 kPa before RT; 28.7 ± 26.3 kPa, 15.1 ± 7.0 kPa, and 14.7 ± 6.3 kPa at 12 months after RT, respectively. The elasticity values for all three measurement areas before and 12 months after RT were significantly different (p < 0.001 for tumor bed, p = 0.002 for non-tumor bed, p = 0.001 for contralateral breast). At 12 months follow-up, the distribution of grades of RIF evaluated by CTCAE grade was grade 0 in 43.9 %, grade 1 in 48.8 %, and grade 2 in 7.3 %.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We demonstrated that SWE enables the evaluation of tissue stiffness to provide quantified information for the RIF of breast cancer. Further studies with long-term follow-up should provide more quantitative data.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10342,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824000508/pdfft?md5=65088cf5cc2c156c8694e714d68d2f13&pid=1-s2.0-S2405630824000508-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140332655","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-29DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100766
Ciro Franzese , Panagiotis Balermpas
Introduction
Although stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has advance to standard-of-care for many different indications like lung and liver malignancies, it still remains in its infancy for treating head and neck cancer. Nevertheless there is a growing body of experience and evidence, which is summarized in this review Methods A thorough search of the literature was performed and critically reviewed both for SABR as a primary treatment as well as for treating locoregionally recurrent disease in a pre-irradiated field.
Results
There exist only few prospective data published so far for treating head and neck cancer with SABR. In the primary situation especially implementing SABR as a boost after definitive radiotherapy or a single-modality for locally limited, small glottic cancer appear promising. On the other hand, SABR can be a useful modality for treating local recurrence in a pre-irradiated field. However, caution is needed in the case of proximity to a pre-irradiated carotid artery or other serial organs at risk. Usually only limited gross volumes are treated with 3-6 fractions every other day and a cumulative dose of 24-44 Gy in dedicated radiosurgery platforms or modern linacs with the possibility of online image-guidance and adequate immobilsation.
Conclusions
SABR is an innovative, effective and promising treatment modality for small targets, especially in near proximity to organs at risk or in a pre-irradiated region. Prospective trials are further needed for this technique to become standard-of care.
{"title":"Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for treating primary head and neck cancer and locoregional recurrence: A comprehensive review of the literature","authors":"Ciro Franzese , Panagiotis Balermpas","doi":"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100766","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100766","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Although stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has advance to standard-of-care for many different indications like lung and liver malignancies, it still remains in its infancy for treating head and neck cancer. Nevertheless there is a growing body of experience and evidence, which is summarized in this review Methods A thorough search of the literature was performed and critically reviewed both for SABR as a primary treatment as well as for treating locoregionally recurrent disease in a pre-irradiated field.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There exist only few prospective data published so far for treating head and neck cancer with SABR. In the primary situation especially implementing SABR as a boost after definitive radiotherapy or a single-modality for locally limited, small glottic cancer appear promising. On the other hand, SABR can be a useful modality for treating local recurrence in a pre-irradiated field. However, caution is needed in the case of proximity to a pre-irradiated carotid artery or other serial organs at risk. Usually only limited gross volumes are treated with 3-6 fractions every other day and a cumulative dose of 24-44 Gy in dedicated radiosurgery platforms or modern linacs with the possibility of online image-guidance and adequate immobilsation.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>SABR is an innovative, effective and promising treatment modality for small targets, especially in near proximity to organs at risk or in a pre-irradiated region. Prospective trials are further needed for this technique to become standard-of care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10342,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824000430/pdfft?md5=66a4e292e5d01e7fa576092b48e9a51e&pid=1-s2.0-S2405630824000430-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140332676","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}