Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology最新文献

Background and purpose

As preparation for a national randomized study comparing proton radiotherapy to photon radiotherapy, DAHANCA 35, we performed a non-randomized pilot study to investigate patient selection, logistics, planning, and treatment delivery. With the present study, as a comprehensive safety analysis, we want to compare toxicity during and up to two months after therapy to a historically matched group of patients treated with photon radiotherapy.

Materials and methods

62 patients treated with protons were matched to 124 patients who received photon treatment outside a protocol. Available data were retrieved from the DAHANCA database. Patients were matched on treatment centre, concurrent chemotherapy, tumour site, stage, p16 status for oropharynx cancers. Selection of patients for proton therapy was based on comparative treatment plans with a NTCP reduction for dysphagia and xerostomia at six months.

Results

Baseline characteristics between groups were well balanced, except for the type of drug used concurrently; more photon patients received Carboplatin (21.2 % vs 5.8 %, p = 0.01). Proton therapy was associated with significantly less weight loss at the end of treatment, mean weight loss of 3 % for protons and 5 % for photons (p < 0.001). There were more grade 3 skin reactions and grade 3 mucositis after proton treatment compared with photons at the end of treatment, Risk Ratio (RR) 1.9 (95 % CI: 1.01–3.5, p = 0.04) and RR 1.5 (95 % CI: 1.3–1.7, p < 0.001), respectively. All differences resolved at follow up two months after treatment. There were no significant differences between groups on opioid use, use of feeding tubes, or hospitalization during the observation period.

Conclusion

Proton treatment resulted in excess objective mucositis and dermatitis, which was transient and did not seem to negatively influence weight or treatment compliance and intensity. Selection bias was likely especially since NTCP models were used for selection of proton treatment and photon treated patients were matched manually. We are currently including patients in a randomized controlled trial.

Background

The major drivers of carbon dioxide (CO₂eq) emissions of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) are not well known and limit our ability to initiate mitigation strategies.

Material and methods

We describe the carbon footprint of four typical centers. We explore direct EBRT associated factors such as the impact of fractionation and use of MRI-LINAC, as well as indirect factors (e.g. patient rides). Treatment strategy related CO₂eq emissions are included in a health technology assessment analysis that takes into account CO₂eq emissions.

Results

A typical EBRT treatment emits from 185 kgCO₂eq to 2066 kgCO₂eq. CO₂eq emissions are mostly driven by (i) accelerator acquisition and maintenance (37.8 %), (ii) patients and workers rides (32.7 %), (iii) drugs and medical devices (7.3 %), (iv) direct energy consumption (6.1 %), and (v) building and bunker construction (5.6 %) with a substantial heterogeneity among centers. Hypofractionation has a strong impact to mitigate emissions. MRI-LINAC is associated with a substantial increase in CO₂eq emissions per fraction and requires ultra hypofractionation in 5 fractions to achieve a similar carbon footprint compared to 20 fractions treatment schemes. The expected limited small increase in toxicities due to hypofractionation (when existing) are in the same range as avoided detrimental effects to future people’s health thanks to CO₂eq mitigation.

Conclusion

Carbon footprint of EBRT is not neglectable and could be mitigated. When safely feasible, hypofractionation is one of the main factors to decrease this impact. Taking into account CO₂eq emissions has a substantial impact on the health technology assessment of EBRT, favoring hypofractionated regimens.

Background and purpose

In a relevant number of primary breast cancer patients, lymphatic drainage to the contralateral internal mammary nodes (cIMN) is being observed. Nevertheless, so far lymphatic drainage pathway to the cIMN is largely neglected during adjuvant radiotherapy.

Materials and methods

This study evaluated the incidental dose to the cIMN for 120 volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment plans for node positive breast in dependence of internal mammary node irradiation (IMNI) and deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH). Additionally, incidental dose distribution to the cIMN based on the field design in the MA20, EORTC22922/10925 and AMAROS trials was assessed.

Results

The incidental dose (Dmean ± SD) to the cIMN-CTV was 13.0 (±4.7) Gy with a maximum dose of < 30 Gy in 113/120 cases. If IMNI was included (n = 80), the Dmean to the cIMN-CTV was significantly higher compared to no IMNI, but still comparably low (n = 40; 14.3 Gy vs. 9.6 Gy; p = 0.0001). Furthermore, the dose in the cIMN during free breathing (n = 80) was higher compared to DIBH (n = 40; 13.9 Gy vs. 11.2 Gy; p = 0.002).

Simulated treatment plans based on the randomized RNI trials revealed neglectable dose coverage of the cIMN (Dmean 1.0–1.8 Gy) for all protocols.

Conclusion

Neither in the randomized RNI trials nor during contemporary treatment techniques clinically relevant dose distribution to the cIMN was observed. Further studies are warranted to assess the potential impact of intended irradiation of cIMN in high-risk patients.

Radiation therapy (RT) is utilized as a bridging strategy for patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma prior to CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR T)-cell therapy. RT has been shown to provide local control without exacerbating the toxicities associated with subsequent CAR T-cell infusion. However, a consensus on the optimal radiation dose and fractionation for bridging purposes has yet to be established. We present a case of a patient with relapsed aggressive B-cell lymphoma who underwent bridging adaptive RT on a CT-linac prior to receiving CAR T-cell therapy. At month 6 post-CAR T infusion, the patient demonstrates no signs of disease recurrence or relapse, nor any unexpected toxicities attributable to the combined treatment. This underscores the feasibility and success of this innovative approach in treating lymphoma patients undergoing CAR T-cell therapy.

Objectives

Locally advanced bulky unresectable head neck cancer causes significant tumor mass effects, leading to severe symptoms. This study aims to report the safety and outcomes in patients undergoing Lattice spatially fractionated radiotherapy (Lattice SFRT) for locally advanced bulky unresectable head and neck cancer.

Methods

Patients with bulky head and neck cancer received Lattice SFRT between June 2022 and June 2023. Lattice SFRT was administered in 2–3 fractions of 12 Gy (Gy) using 6-megavolt (MV) photon beams through a multileaf collimator (MLC) based on VMAT technology. The primary endpoints were symptomatic and tumor response rates. Secondary endpoints were overall survival, local control, and acute and late toxicity rates.

Results

19 consecutive patients meeting the study criteria were identified, predominantly with squamous cell carcinoma histology. The median patient age was 62 years (range 39–79 years), and the median tumor volume was 208 cc (cc) (range 48–701 cc). All patients completed radiotherapy. Among all investigated patients, 16 of 19 (84.2 %) patients achieved an objective response, including 10 individuals achieved a partial response (PR), with 3 of them exhibiting regression exceeding 75 %. 17 patients showed symptom improvement to varying degrees. Acute toxicity of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) grade 1 or higher occurred in 5 patients, while no grade 3 adverse events was observed.

Conclusions

Lattice SFRT proves to be a viable treatment option for the palliative management of bulky head and neck cancer. In the palliative setting, Lattice SFRT offers timely symptom relief, enhancing patient quality of life. Treatment toxicity remains within an acceptable range. Continued optimization of Lattice SFRT delivery and patient selection can benefit from further data on the feasibility and efficacy of this radiation modality.

Background

For locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC), treatment response to radiotherapy (RT) can vary significantly even among those with the same stage classification of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO). This study investigated the value of ADC metric for forecasting end-of-treatment outcomes in LACC patients referred for RT.

Methods

Eighty patients with pathologically confirmed cervical squamous cell carcinoma with (SCC) were included in the research. Abdominal or pelvic MRI scans were conducted at least three times for all participants: before RT, three weeks after beginning of RT and approximately two months after RT was finalized. Calculated apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of the LACC include: pre-ADC, interim-ADC, ΔADC and Δ%ADC. Based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1, subjects were calculated and subsequently categorized into good responders group (complete response) and poor responders group (progressive disease, stable disease or partial response).

Results

Compared to good-responders, subjects of poor-responder group showed significantly lower values of interim-ADC, ΔADC, and Δ%ADC (all P < 0.05). To distinguish between good and poor responders, the optimal cutoff values of interim-ADC, ΔADC, and Δ%ADC were determined to be 1.067 × 10⁻³ mm²/sec, 0.209 × 10⁻³ mm²/sec, and 30.74 % using the ROC curve, with corresponding sensitivities of 83.78 %, 86.49 %, 75.68 %, and specificities of 88.37 %, 86.49 %, 75.68 %, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that the baseline tumor diameter and interim-ADC were significant prognostic factors for treatment response with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.105 (95 % confidence interval [95 % CI] 0.018–0.616) for baseline tumor diameter and 42.896 (95 % CI 8.205–224.262) for interim-ADC.

Conclusion

The interim-ADC value and baseline tumor diameter surfaced as possible indicative factors for predicting the response to RT in patients with LACC.

Background

The effectiveness of radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer is debated. Patient-derived organoids (PDOs) already mimicked clinical radiation response in other cancer types, which could be valuable in pancreatic cancer as well. This study aimed to investigate whether PDOs can be used to model RT response in pancreatic cancer and to explore the presence of a dose–response correlation.

Methods

PDOs derived from two pancreatic cancer patients (HUB-08-B2-022A and HUB-08-B2-026B) were irradiated with doses ranging from 0 to 40 Gray. Viability assessments were conducted after seven and 10 days by measuring ATP-levels. Results were normalized, defining the viability at 0 Gray as 100 % and an absolute viability of 0 as 0 %. The relative area under the curve (rAUC) was calculated (0 = total sensitivity, 1 = total resistance).

Results

With a readout time of seven days, both HUB-08-B2-022A and HUB-08-B2-026B exhibited viability above 50 % at the highest dose of 12 Gy (rAUC of 0.79 and 0.69, respectively). With a readout time of 10 days, both PDOs showed a dose–response relation although HUB-08-B2-022A was more sensitive than HUB-08-B2-026B (rAUC of 0.37 and 0.51, respectively). Increasing the radiation dose to 40 Gy did not further affect viability, but the dose–response relation remained present (rAUC of 0.13 and 0.26, respectively). In the final experiment with a readout time of 10 days and a maximum dose of 14 Gy, the dose–response correlation was paramount in both PDOs (rAUC 0.28 and 0.45, respectively), with HUB-08-B2-022A being most sensitive.

Conclusions

In this setup, both pancreatic cancer PDOs showed an irradiation dose–response correlation. These preliminary findings suggest that pancreatic cancer PDOs are suitable for assessing radiation response in vitro. Further experiments are needed to eventually simulate treatment responses to personalized treatment strategies.

Background and purpose

This exploratory prospective observational study investigated the changes in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in rectal cancer patients (RCPs), from diagnosis to one-year-post-surgery follow-up and explored the role of physical symptoms and psychological determinants on HRQoL at the different time points.

Materials and methods

We assessed HRQoL, psychological distress, coping, affectivity, alexithymia and social support in 43 RCPs treated with preoperative (chemo)radiation and surgery, at three different assessment time points: diagnosis (T0), one month after the end of preoperative treatment (T1), one month after resection surgery (T2), and at follow-up (T3).

Results

The data showed that HRQoL decreased during active treatments, especially between T1 and T2 (p = 0.005), before increasing again at follow-up (p = 0.002).

Baseline intestinal symptoms (p < 0.001) and negative affectivity trait (p = 0.03) significantly predicted HRQoL at T0. Baseline pain (p < 0.001), intestinal (p = 0.003) and urinary (p = 0.009) symptoms at T1 significantly predicted HRQoL at T1. A fatalistic coping style at T1 (p = 0.013), psychological distress (p = 0.003), mouth symptoms (p = 0.001) at T2 significantly predicted HRQoL at T2. Similarly, a fatalistic coping style at T1 (p = 0.006), psychological distress (p = 0.004), mouth (p = 0.002) and pain symptoms (p = 0.002) at T3 significantly predicted HRQoL at T3.

Conclusion

Several physical and psychological factors are involved in the changes occurring after diagnosis in RCPs’ HRQoL. While cancer-related symptoms and treatment-related physical side effects are the main predictors of HRQoL at diagnosis and during active treatments, early psychological reactions have a higher predictive weight in post-treatment HRQoL.

These data emphasise the importance of active screening, early diagnosis, and preventive psychological interventions immediately after diagnosis to improve HRQoL and psychological health outcomes.

Purpose

To retrospectively identify clinical, pathologic, or imaging factors predictive of local relapse (LR) after preoperative radiotherapy (RT) for soft tissue sarcomas (STS).

Methods and Materials

This is a retrospective multicenter study of patients who underwent preoperative RT and surgery for limb or trunk wall STS between 2007 and 2018 in French Sarcoma Group centers and were enrolled in the “Conticabase”. Patterns of LR were investigated taking into account the multimodal response after preoperative RT. Diagnostic and surgical samples were compared after systematic review by expert pathologists and patients were stratified by tumor grade. Log-rank tests and Cox models were used to identify prognostic factors for radiation response and LR.

Results

257 patients were included; 17 % had low-grade (LG), 72.5 % had high-grade (HG) sarcomas. In HG group, tumors were larger, mostly undifferentiated, and displayed more necrosis and perilesional edema after RT. Median follow-up was 32 months. Five-year cumulative incidence of LR was 20.3 % in the HG group versus 9.7 % in the LG group (p = 0.026). In multivariate analysis, trunk wall location (HR 6.79, p = 0.012) and proportion of viable tumor cellularity ≥ 20 % (HR 3.15, p = 0.018) were associated with LR. After adjusting for tumor location, combination of histotype and cellularity rate significantly correlated with LR. We described three prognostic subgroups for HG sarcomas, listed from the highest to lowest risk: undifferentiated sarcoma (US) with cellularity rates ≥ 20 %; non-US (NUS) with cellularity rates ≥ 20 % or US with cellularity rates < 20 %; and NUS with cellularity rates < 20 %, which shared similar prognostic risks with LG sarcomas.

Conclusions

HG and LG tumors have different morphological and biological behaviors in response to RT. Combination of cellularity rate with histotype could be a major prognostic for LR. Patients with undifferentiated HG sarcomas with cellularity rates ≥ 20 % after preoperative RT had the highest risk of LR and disease-specific death.