首页 > 最新文献

Clinical genitourinary cancer最新文献

英文 中文
Characteristics of Abdominal Fat Based on CT Measurements to Predict Early Recurrence After Initial Surgery of NMIBC in Stage Ta/T1 基于 CT 测量的腹部脂肪特征预测 Ta/T1 期 NMIBC 初次手术后的早期复发
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102199
Nengfeng Yu , Congcong Xu , Yiwei Jiang , Dekai Liu , Lianghao Lin , Gangfu Zheng , Jiaqi Du , Kefan Yang , Qifeng Zhong , Yicheng Chen , Yichun Zheng

Introduction

This study aimed to assess the predictive value of abdominal fat characteristics measured by computed tomography (CT) in identifying early recurrence within one year post-initial transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) in patients with nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). A predictive model integrating fat features and clinical factors was developed to guide individualized treatment.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective analysis of 203 NMIBC patients from two medical centers was conducted. Abdominal CT images were analyzed using 3D Slicer software. Spearman correlation, logistic regression, and the Lasso algorithm were employed for data analysis. Predictive efficacy was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and decision curve analysis (DCA). Calibration was evaluated using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test.

Results

Significant differences in abdominal fat characteristics were found between the recurrence and nonrecurrence groups. All fat features positively correlated with body mass index (BMI), with bilateral perirenal fat thickness (PrFT) showing superior predictive performance. Multivariate logistic regression identified independent predictors of early recurrence, including tumor number, early perfusion chemotherapy, left and right PrFT, and visceral fat area (VFA) at umbilical and renal hilum levels. The Lasso-based model achieved an AUC of 0.904, outperforming existing models.

Conclusion

Abdominal fat characteristics, especially bilateral PrFT, strongly correlate with early recurrence in NMIBC. The Lasso-based model, integrating fat and clinical factors, offers superior predictive efficacy and could improve individualized treatment strategies.

简介:本研究旨在评估通过计算机断层扫描(CT)测量的腹部脂肪特征在非肌层浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)患者首次经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术(TURBT)后一年内识别早期复发的预测价值。我们开发了一个综合脂肪特征和临床因素的预测模型,以指导个体化治疗。材料与方法我们对两个医疗中心的 203 名 NMIBC 患者进行了回顾性分析。使用 3D Slicer 软件对腹部 CT 图像进行分析。数据分析采用了斯皮尔曼相关性、逻辑回归和 Lasso 算法。预测效果采用接收者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)和决策曲线分析(DCA)进行评估。结果发现复发组和非复发组的腹部脂肪特征存在显著差异。所有脂肪特征均与体重指数(BMI)呈正相关,其中双侧肾周脂肪厚度(PrFT)的预测性更强。多变量逻辑回归确定了早期复发的独立预测因素,包括肿瘤数量、早期灌注化疗、左侧和右侧PrFT以及脐和肾门水平的内脏脂肪面积(VFA)。结论腹部脂肪特征,尤其是双侧 PrFT 与 NMIBC 早期复发密切相关。结论腹部脂肪特征,尤其是双侧 PrFT 与 NMIBC 早期复发密切相关。基于 Lasso 的模型综合了脂肪和临床因素,具有更高的预测效果,可改善个体化治疗策略。
{"title":"Characteristics of Abdominal Fat Based on CT Measurements to Predict Early Recurrence After Initial Surgery of NMIBC in Stage Ta/T1","authors":"Nengfeng Yu ,&nbsp;Congcong Xu ,&nbsp;Yiwei Jiang ,&nbsp;Dekai Liu ,&nbsp;Lianghao Lin ,&nbsp;Gangfu Zheng ,&nbsp;Jiaqi Du ,&nbsp;Kefan Yang ,&nbsp;Qifeng Zhong ,&nbsp;Yicheng Chen ,&nbsp;Yichun Zheng","doi":"10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102199","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102199","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>This study aimed to assess the predictive value of abdominal fat characteristics measured by computed tomography (CT) in identifying early recurrence within one year post-initial transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) in patients with nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). A predictive model integrating fat features and clinical factors was developed to guide individualized treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>A retrospective analysis of 203 NMIBC patients from two medical centers was conducted. Abdominal CT images were analyzed using 3D Slicer software. Spearman correlation, logistic regression, and the Lasso algorithm were employed for data analysis. Predictive efficacy was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and decision curve analysis (DCA). Calibration was evaluated using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Significant differences in abdominal fat characteristics were found between the recurrence and nonrecurrence groups. All fat features positively correlated with body mass index (BMI), with bilateral perirenal fat thickness (PrFT) showing superior predictive performance. Multivariate logistic regression identified independent predictors of early recurrence, including tumor number, early perfusion chemotherapy, left and right PrFT, and visceral fat area (VFA) at umbilical and renal hilum levels. The Lasso-based model achieved an AUC of 0.904, outperforming existing models.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Abdominal fat characteristics, especially bilateral PrFT, strongly correlate with early recurrence in NMIBC. The Lasso-based model, integrating fat and clinical factors, offers superior predictive efficacy and could improve individualized treatment strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10380,"journal":{"name":"Clinical genitourinary cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142167621","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Platinum Chemotherapy After PARP Inhibition in HRR-Deficient Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer PARP抑制后的铂化疗在HRR缺陷的转移性阉割耐药前列腺癌中的应用
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102187
Jennifer Obasi , Komal Sharma , Navonil De Sarkar , Emmanuel S. Antonarakis , Deepak Kilari

  • PARP inhibitors can be efficacious in a selected cohort of prostate cancer patients with HRD.

  • A significant fraction of PARP inhibitor resistance occurs due to adoption of PARylation bypass mechanisms, while still maintaining HRRd status in the cancer cell.

  • In this subset of patients, Carboplatin can be considered for salvage if reversion mutations are not detected following PARP inhibitor failure.

-在这部分患者中,如果 PARP 抑制剂失效后未检测到逆转突变,可考虑使用卡铂进行挽救。
{"title":"Platinum Chemotherapy After PARP Inhibition in HRR-Deficient Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer","authors":"Jennifer Obasi ,&nbsp;Komal Sharma ,&nbsp;Navonil De Sarkar ,&nbsp;Emmanuel S. Antonarakis ,&nbsp;Deepak Kilari","doi":"10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102187","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102187","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p></p><ul><li><span>•</span><span><p>PARP inhibitors can be efficacious in a selected cohort of prostate cancer patients with HRD.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>A significant fraction of PARP inhibitor resistance occurs due to adoption of PARylation bypass mechanisms, while still maintaining HRRd status in the cancer cell.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>In this subset of patients, Carboplatin can be considered for salvage if reversion mutations are not detected following PARP inhibitor failure.</p></span></li></ul></div>","PeriodicalId":10380,"journal":{"name":"Clinical genitourinary cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142147167","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Real-world Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Abiraterone With Food and Standard-Dose Abiraterone in De Novo Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis 低剂量阿比特龙配伍食品和标准剂量阿比特龙治疗新发转移性激素敏感性前列腺癌的实际疗效和安全性:回顾性分析
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102191
Tu Anh Do , Phuong Mai Tran , Trang Huyen Vu , Hung Khac Tran , Huong Quynh Nguyen , Loi Dinh Nguyen , Hong Thi Nguyen , Chu Van Nguyen

Background

The standard treatment for de novo metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) involves androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) combined with next-generation hormonal agents and/or docetaxel. While the standard dose (STD) of abiraterone is 1,000 mg administered while fasting, recent evidence suggests that a low dose (LOW) of 250 mg taken with a low-fat meal may achieve comparable pharmacokinetic outcomes.

Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate the failure-free survival (FFS) and safety of LOW and STD in de novo high-risk mHSPC patients.

Materials and Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of males with de novo high-risk mHSPC treated with ADT plus abiraterone (250 mg with a low-fat meal or 1000 mg fasting) at the Vietnam National Cancer Hospital from January 2019 to May 2024. The primary endpoint was FFS, assessed using Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression analyses.

Results

The study included 183 patients, with 91 in the LOW group and 92 in the STD group. The rates of patients who achieved undetectable PSA (PSA < 0.2 ng/ml) were 52.7% in the LOW group and 47.8% in the STD group. The median time to undetectable PSA was 6.9 months in the LOW group and 6.4 months in the STD group. The median overall FFS was 28.1 months (95% CI: 21.1 to 35.0) in the LOW group and 25.4 months (95% CI: 15.5 to 35.3) in the STD group (P = .286). Multivariate analysis indicated that visceral metastases and detectable PSA (PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/ml) were significant negative predictors of FFS in both groups. The incidence of grade 3 and grade 4 adverse events was similar between the LOW group and the STD group.

Conclusions

The LOW group and STD group showed effectiveness and safety in de novo high-risk mHSPC. The use of low-dose abiraterone in de novo mHSPC can significantly reduce treatment costs.

背景新发转移性激素敏感性前列腺癌(mHSPC)的标准治疗包括雄激素剥夺疗法(ADT)联合新一代激素药物和/或多西他赛。虽然阿比特龙的标准剂量(STD)是空腹服用 1,000 毫克,但最近的证据表明,在低脂饮食中服用 250 毫克的低剂量(LOW)可获得相似的药代动力学结果。材料与方法我们对2019年1月至2024年5月期间在越南国家癌症医院接受ADT加阿比特龙(250毫克低脂餐或1000毫克空腹)治疗的男性新发高危mHSPC患者进行了回顾性分析。主要终点是FFS,采用Kaplan-Meier和多变量Cox回归分析进行评估。结果该研究共纳入183名患者,其中LOW组91人,STD组92人。LOW组检测不到PSA(PSA为0.2纳克/毫升)的患者比例为52.7%,STD组为47.8%。低剂量组检测不到 PSA 的中位时间为 6.9 个月,STD 组为 6.4 个月。LOW组的中位总体FFS为28.1个月(95% CI:21.1至35.0),STD组为25.4个月(95% CI:15.5至35.3)(P = .286)。多变量分析表明,内脏转移和可检测到的 PSA(PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/ml)是两组患者 FFS 的显著负向预测因素。LOW组和STD组的3级和4级不良反应发生率相似。低剂量阿比特龙治疗新发高危mHSPC可显著降低治疗成本。
{"title":"Real-world Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Abiraterone With Food and Standard-Dose Abiraterone in De Novo Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis","authors":"Tu Anh Do ,&nbsp;Phuong Mai Tran ,&nbsp;Trang Huyen Vu ,&nbsp;Hung Khac Tran ,&nbsp;Huong Quynh Nguyen ,&nbsp;Loi Dinh Nguyen ,&nbsp;Hong Thi Nguyen ,&nbsp;Chu Van Nguyen","doi":"10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102191","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102191","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The standard treatment for de novo metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) involves androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) combined with next-generation hormonal agents and/or docetaxel. While the standard dose (STD) of abiraterone is 1,000 mg administered while fasting, recent evidence suggests that a low dose (LOW) of 250 mg taken with a low-fat meal may achieve comparable pharmacokinetic outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study aimed to evaluate the failure-free survival (FFS) and safety of LOW and STD in de novo high-risk mHSPC patients.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>We conducted a retrospective analysis of males with de novo high-risk mHSPC treated with ADT plus abiraterone (250 mg with a low-fat meal or 1000 mg fasting) at the Vietnam National Cancer Hospital from January 2019 to May 2024. The primary endpoint was FFS, assessed using Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression analyses.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The study included 183 patients, with 91 in the LOW group and 92 in the STD group. The rates of patients who achieved undetectable PSA (PSA &lt; 0.2 ng/ml) were 52.7% in the LOW group and 47.8% in the STD group. The median time to undetectable PSA was 6.9 months in the LOW group and 6.4 months in the STD group. The median overall FFS was 28.1 months (95% CI: 21.1 to 35.0) in the LOW group and 25.4 months (95% CI: 15.5 to 35.3) in the STD group (<em>P</em> = .286). Multivariate analysis indicated that visceral metastases and detectable PSA (PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/ml) were significant negative predictors of FFS in both groups. The incidence of grade 3 and grade 4 adverse events was similar between the LOW group and the STD group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The LOW group and STD group showed effectiveness and safety in de novo high-risk mHSPC. The use of low-dose abiraterone in de novo mHSPC can significantly reduce treatment costs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10380,"journal":{"name":"Clinical genitourinary cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142121977","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Outcomes of First-Line Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide for Older Adults With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer According to Use of Upfront Docetaxel for Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer in an International Multicenter Registry: A SPARTACUSS—Meet-URO 26 Study 一项国际多中心登记研究显示,根据转移性钙化敏感性前列腺癌患者前期使用多西他赛的情况,转移性钙化耐药前列腺癌老年患者一线使用醋酸阿比特龙或恩杂鲁胺的疗效:SPARTACUSS-Meet-URO 26 研究。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102185
Giuseppe Fotia , Calogero Saieva , Richard Lee-Ying , Anna Patrikidou , Pier Vitale Nuzzo , Elisa Zanardi , Sabrina Rossetti , Matthew Davidsohn , Marc Eid , Talal El Zarif , Heather McClure , Gian Paolo Spinelli , Alessandra Damassi , Veronica Murianni , Charles Vauchier , Thiago Martins Oliveira , Andrea Malgeri , Mikol Modesti , Ricardo Pereira Mestre , Loana Valenca , Edoardo Francini

Background

Managing metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in men aged ≥ 75 is challenging due to limited data. Regardless of age, in real-world clinical practice, most mCRPC still derive from failure of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with or without docetaxel (D) for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). As abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AA) and enzalutamide (Enza) are common first-line treatments for mCRPC. The impact of prior use of D for mCSPC on the efficacy and safety of AA or Enza in this older population remains unclear.

Methods

A cohort of patients aged ≥ 75 years starting AA or Enza as first-line therapy for mCRPC from January 2015 to April 2019 was identified from the registries of 10 institutions. Patients were categorized into 2 groups based on previous use of D for mCSPC. Primary endpoints were cancer-specific survival (CSS) from AA or Enza start, CSS from ADT onset, and safety. We used Kaplan–Meier method to estimate the endpoints distribution, including median values with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

Results

Of the 337 patients identified, 24 (7.1%) received ADT+D and 313 (92.9%) received ADT alone for mCSPC. Median follow-up from AA/Enza start was 18.8 months. Median CSS from ADT or AA/Enza was not significantly different between ADT+D and ADT alone cohorts (71.9 vs. 52.7 months, P = .97; 25.4 vs. 27.2 months, P = .89, respectively). No statistically significant difference in adverse events (AEs) of any grade rate (58.3% vs. 52.1%, respectively; P = .67) or grade ≥ 3 (12.5% vs. 15.7%, respectively; P = 1.0) was found between ADT+D and ADT alone cohorts.

Conclusions

Despite the innate limitations of a retrospective design and relatively small size of the ADT+D cohort, this analysis suggests that elderly men receiving AA or Enza as first-line therapy for mCRPC have similar survival outcomes and tolerability, regardless of previous D for mCSPC.

背景:由于数据有限,治疗年龄≥75岁男性的转移性抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)具有挑战性。无论年龄大小,在实际临床实践中,大多数 mCRPC 仍源于雄激素剥夺疗法(ADT)联合或不联合多西他赛(Docetaxel)治疗转移性阉割敏感性前列腺癌(mCSPC)的失败。醋酸阿比特龙加泼尼松(AA)和恩扎鲁胺(Enza)是治疗mCRPC的常见一线疗法。在这一老年群体中,先前使用D治疗mCSPC对AA或Enza的疗效和安全性的影响仍不清楚:从 10 家机构的登记簿中确定了 2015 年 1 月至 2019 年 4 月期间开始接受 AA 或 Enza 作为 mCRPC 一线治疗的年龄≥ 75 岁的患者队列。根据既往使用 D 治疗 mCSPC 的情况,将患者分为 2 组。主要终点为从 AA 或 Enza 开始的癌症特异性生存率 (CSS)、从 ADT 开始的 CSS 以及安全性。我们采用 Kaplan-Meier 法估算终点分布,包括中位值和 95% 置信区间 (95%CI):在确定的 337 例患者中,24 例(7.1%)接受了 ADT+D,313 例(92.9%)接受了 ADT 单药治疗 mCSPC。从 AA/Enza 开始的中位随访时间为 18.8 个月。从 ADT 或 AA/Enza 开始的中位 CSS 在 ADT+D 和 ADT 单独治疗组之间无显著差异(分别为 71.9 个月 vs. 52.7 个月,P = .97; 25.4 个月 vs. 27.2 个月,P = .89)。ADT+D组和单纯ADT组在任何等级的不良事件(AEs)发生率(分别为58.3% vs. 52.1%;P = .67)或等级≥3(分别为12.5% vs. 15.7%;P = 1.0)方面均无统计学差异:结论:尽管ADT+D队列存在回顾性设计和规模相对较小的先天局限性,但这项分析表明,老年男性在接受AA或Enza作为mCRPC一线治疗时,无论之前是否接受过mCSPC D治疗,其生存结果和耐受性都相似。
{"title":"Outcomes of First-Line Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide for Older Adults With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer According to Use of Upfront Docetaxel for Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer in an International Multicenter Registry: A SPARTACUSS—Meet-URO 26 Study","authors":"Giuseppe Fotia ,&nbsp;Calogero Saieva ,&nbsp;Richard Lee-Ying ,&nbsp;Anna Patrikidou ,&nbsp;Pier Vitale Nuzzo ,&nbsp;Elisa Zanardi ,&nbsp;Sabrina Rossetti ,&nbsp;Matthew Davidsohn ,&nbsp;Marc Eid ,&nbsp;Talal El Zarif ,&nbsp;Heather McClure ,&nbsp;Gian Paolo Spinelli ,&nbsp;Alessandra Damassi ,&nbsp;Veronica Murianni ,&nbsp;Charles Vauchier ,&nbsp;Thiago Martins Oliveira ,&nbsp;Andrea Malgeri ,&nbsp;Mikol Modesti ,&nbsp;Ricardo Pereira Mestre ,&nbsp;Loana Valenca ,&nbsp;Edoardo Francini","doi":"10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102185","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102185","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Managing metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in men aged ≥ 75 is challenging due to limited data. Regardless of age, in real-world clinical practice, most mCRPC still derive from failure of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with or without docetaxel (D) for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). As abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AA) and enzalutamide (Enza) are common first-line treatments for mCRPC. The impact of prior use of D for mCSPC on the efficacy and safety of AA or Enza in this older population remains unclear.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A cohort of patients aged ≥ 75 years starting AA or Enza as first-line therapy for mCRPC from January 2015 to April 2019 was identified from the registries of 10 institutions. Patients were categorized into 2 groups based on previous use of D for mCSPC. Primary endpoints were cancer-specific survival (CSS) from AA or Enza start, CSS from ADT onset, and safety. We used Kaplan–Meier method to estimate the endpoints distribution, including median values with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 337 patients identified, 24 (7.1%) received ADT+D and 313 (92.9%) received ADT alone for mCSPC. Median follow-up from AA/Enza start was 18.8 months. Median CSS from ADT or AA/Enza was not significantly different between ADT+D and ADT alone cohorts (71.9 vs. 52.7 months, <em>P</em> = .97; 25.4 vs. 27.2 months, <em>P</em> = .89, respectively). No statistically significant difference in adverse events (AEs) of any grade rate (58.3% vs. 52.1%, respectively; <em>P</em> = .67) or grade ≥ 3 (12.5% vs. 15.7%, respectively; <em>P</em> = 1.0) was found between ADT+D and ADT alone cohorts.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Despite the innate limitations of a retrospective design and relatively small size of the ADT+D cohort, this analysis suggests that elderly men receiving AA or Enza as first-line therapy for mCRPC have similar survival outcomes and tolerability, regardless of previous D for mCSPC.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10380,"journal":{"name":"Clinical genitourinary cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1558767324001563/pdfft?md5=788cd2a22697f7d97ca7f99170dadc4f&pid=1-s2.0-S1558767324001563-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142115986","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Treatment Patterns and Survival Outcomes Among Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibitor-Experienced Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer 雄激素受体通路抑制剂治疗经验丰富的转移性阉割耐药前列腺癌患者的治疗模式和生存结果
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102188
Vivek Narayan , Miraj Y. Patel , Siguroli Teitsson , Lisa Rosenblatt , Xin Yin , Irina Pivneva , Sophie Gao , Manasvi Sundar , Keith A. Betts

Background

There is limited real-world data regarding subsequent treatment utilization and clinical outcomes following initial androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) exposure for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. This study aimed to address this evidence gap.

Methods

Electronic health records during 01/01/2013-07/31/2022 from Flatiron Health were used to identify adults with mCRPC, who had prior exposure to ARPIs (irrespective of the setting) and ≥1 post-ARPI line of therapy (LOT) in the mCRPC setting (index therapy: the first eligible LOT in the mCRPC setting). Treatment patterns and survival outcomes following the initiation of index therapy were reported.

Results

Among 804 ARPI-experienced mCRPC patients, 459 patients (57.1%) received another ARPI as their index therapy and 192 (23.9%) received chemotherapy as their index therapy. In the overall population, median time on the index therapy and median time from index therapy to next therapy were 4.1 and 6.2 months, respectively. Median overall survival and radiographic progression-free survival from the initiation of index therapy were 15.1 and 7.0 months, respectively.

Conclusions

In this real-world analysis, more than half of patients attempted at least 1 additional ARPI in the mCRPC setting, despite prior treatment with ARPIs. The short treatment duration and survival time highlight the unmet need for additional, effective therapies that may improve clinical outcomes in this population.

背景有关初次接触雄激素受体途径抑制剂(ARPI)治疗晚期前列腺癌后的后续治疗利用率和临床结果的真实世界数据十分有限。本研究旨在填补这一证据空白。方法利用Flatiron Health公司2013年1月1日至2022年7月31日期间的电子健康记录来识别mCRPC成人患者,这些患者之前曾接触过ARPIs(无论在哪种情况下),并且在mCRPC情况下ARPI治疗线(LOT)后≥1次(指数治疗:在mCRPC情况下符合条件的首次LOT)。结果在804名接受过ARPI治疗的mCRPC患者中,有459名患者(57.1%)接受了另一种ARPI作为其指标疗法,有192名患者(23.9%)接受了化疗作为其指标疗法。在总体人群中,接受初始治疗的中位时间和从初始治疗到下一次治疗的中位时间分别为4.1个月和6.2个月。结论在这项真实世界分析中,尽管之前已接受过 ARPIs 治疗,但仍有一半以上的患者在 mCRPC 环境中尝试了至少一种额外的 ARPI。较短的治疗时间和存活时间凸显了对其他有效疗法的需求尚未得到满足,而这些疗法可能会改善这一人群的临床预后。
{"title":"Treatment Patterns and Survival Outcomes Among Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibitor-Experienced Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer","authors":"Vivek Narayan ,&nbsp;Miraj Y. Patel ,&nbsp;Siguroli Teitsson ,&nbsp;Lisa Rosenblatt ,&nbsp;Xin Yin ,&nbsp;Irina Pivneva ,&nbsp;Sophie Gao ,&nbsp;Manasvi Sundar ,&nbsp;Keith A. Betts","doi":"10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102188","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102188","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>There is limited real-world data regarding subsequent treatment utilization and clinical outcomes following initial androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) exposure for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. This study aimed to address this evidence gap.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Electronic health records during 01/01/2013-07/31/2022 from Flatiron Health were used to identify adults with mCRPC, who had prior exposure to ARPIs (irrespective of the setting) and ≥1 post-ARPI line of therapy (LOT) in the mCRPC setting (index therapy: the first eligible LOT in the mCRPC setting). Treatment patterns and survival outcomes following the initiation of index therapy were reported.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 804 ARPI-experienced mCRPC patients, 459 patients (57.1%) received another ARPI as their index therapy and 192 (23.9%) received chemotherapy as their index therapy. In the overall population, median time on the index therapy and median time from index therapy to next therapy were 4.1 and 6.2 months, respectively. Median overall survival and radiographic progression-free survival from the initiation of index therapy were 15.1 and 7.0 months, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In this real-world analysis, more than half of patients attempted at least 1 additional ARPI in the mCRPC setting, despite prior treatment with ARPIs. The short treatment duration and survival time highlight the unmet need for additional, effective therapies that may improve clinical outcomes in this population.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10380,"journal":{"name":"Clinical genitourinary cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1558767324001599/pdfft?md5=f083c4da3f437fcaba69eeb9c690a0b9&pid=1-s2.0-S1558767324001599-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142129274","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Use of Lurbinectedin for the Treatment of Small Cell and Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Prostate 使用鲁比替丁治疗前列腺小细胞癌和神经内分泌癌
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102172
Haley Meyer , Rajitha Sunkara , Emily Rothmann , Amar Shah , Irbaz Riaz , Kevin Dale Courtney , Andrew J. Armstrong , Andrea Lippucci , Syed Arsalan Ahmed Naqvi , Melissa L. Stanton , Himisha Beltran , Alan Haruo Bryce

Introduction

Lurbinectedin is FDA approved for treatment of metastatic small cell lung cancer (SCLC) following progression on or after platinum-based chemotherapy. Prostatic small cell or neuroendocrine carcinoma (SC/NEPC) behaves like SCLC; however, no safety or efficacy data for lurbinectedin in SC/NEPC exists.

Patients and methods

All SC/NEPC patients treated with lurbinectedin across 4 academic oncology centers were identified. Baseline patient data and lurbinectedin outcomes including radiographic responses (complete response [CR], partial response [PR], stable disease [SD], progressive disease [PD]), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) were described. Clinical benefit rate (CBR) included CR, PR, or SD on imaging. Descriptive statistics were performed.

Results

At first lurbinectedin dose, all 18 patients had metastatic disease. Median age was 63.5 (Range: 53-84), number of prior systemic therapies was 4 (Range: 2-7), and lurbinectedin cycles completed was 5 (Range: 1-10). ADT was administered during lurbinectedin treatment in 9/18 patients. CBR was 9/16 (56%). The most common trAEs were fatigue and anemia. Median OS and PFS were 6.01 (0.23-16.69) and 3.35 (0.16-7.79) months.

Conclusions

Lurbinectedin showed modest but significant clinical benefit in some patients with SC/NEPC and demonstrated an acceptable toxicity profile with no hospitalizations from trAEs. SC/NEPC is an aggressive disease with a poor prognosis for which more treatment options are needed. Evidence for subsequent treatments after platinum-based chemotherapy is lacking. Lurbinectedin is an active treatment option for SC/NEPC; however, larger confirmatory studies are needed.

简介:美国食品及药物管理局(FDA)已批准使用鲁贝替丁(Lurbinectedin)治疗铂类化疗进展后的转移性小细胞肺癌(SCLC)。前列腺小细胞癌或神经内分泌癌(SC/NEPC)的表现与SCLC相似,但目前尚无鲁贝替定治疗SC/NEPC的安全性或疗效数据。患者和方法确定了4个学术肿瘤中心所有接受鲁贝替定治疗的SC/NEPC患者。描述了患者基线数据和鲁贝替尼治疗结果,包括放射学反应(完全反应 [CR]、部分反应 [PR]、疾病稳定 [SD]、疾病进展 [PD])、无进展生存期 (PFS)、总生存期 (OS) 和治疗相关不良事件 (trAEs)。临床获益率(CBR)包括影像学上的 CR、PR 或 SD。结果首次服用鲁宾丁时,18 名患者均患有转移性疾病。中位年龄为 63.5 岁(范围:53-84 岁),既往接受过全身治疗的人数为 4 人(范围:2-7 人),完成的鲁比替尼周期为 5 个(范围:1-10 个)。9/18例患者在鲁比替丁治疗期间使用了ADT。CBR 为 9/16(56%)。最常见的 trAEs 是疲劳和贫血。中位 OS 和 PFS 分别为 6.01 (0.23-16.69) 个月和 3.35 (0.16-7.79) 个月。SC/NEPC是一种侵袭性疾病,预后较差,需要更多的治疗方案。目前还缺乏铂类化疗后后续治疗的证据。鲁贝替尼是一种积极的SC/NEPC治疗方案,但还需要更大规模的确证研究。
{"title":"The Use of Lurbinectedin for the Treatment of Small Cell and Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Prostate","authors":"Haley Meyer ,&nbsp;Rajitha Sunkara ,&nbsp;Emily Rothmann ,&nbsp;Amar Shah ,&nbsp;Irbaz Riaz ,&nbsp;Kevin Dale Courtney ,&nbsp;Andrew J. Armstrong ,&nbsp;Andrea Lippucci ,&nbsp;Syed Arsalan Ahmed Naqvi ,&nbsp;Melissa L. Stanton ,&nbsp;Himisha Beltran ,&nbsp;Alan Haruo Bryce","doi":"10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102172","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102172","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Lurbinectedin is FDA approved for treatment of metastatic small cell lung cancer (SCLC) following progression on or after platinum-based chemotherapy. Prostatic small cell or neuroendocrine carcinoma (SC/NEPC) behaves like SCLC; however, no safety or efficacy data for lurbinectedin in SC/NEPC exists.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p>All SC/NEPC patients treated with lurbinectedin across 4 academic oncology centers were identified. Baseline patient data and lurbinectedin outcomes including radiographic responses (complete response [CR], partial response [PR], stable disease [SD], progressive disease [PD]), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) were described. Clinical benefit rate (CBR) included CR, PR, or SD on imaging. Descriptive statistics were performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>At first lurbinectedin dose, all 18 patients had metastatic disease. Median age was 63.5 (Range: 53-84), number of prior systemic therapies was 4 (Range: 2-7), and lurbinectedin cycles completed was 5 (Range: 1-10). ADT was administered during lurbinectedin treatment in 9/18 patients. CBR was 9/16 (56%). The most common trAEs were fatigue and anemia. Median OS and PFS were 6.01 (0.23-16.69) and 3.35 (0.16-7.79) months.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Lurbinectedin showed modest but significant clinical benefit in some patients with SC/NEPC and demonstrated an acceptable toxicity profile with no hospitalizations from trAEs. SC/NEPC is an aggressive disease with a poor prognosis for which more treatment options are needed. Evidence for subsequent treatments after platinum-based chemotherapy is lacking. Lurbinectedin is an active treatment option for SC/NEPC; however, larger confirmatory studies are needed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10380,"journal":{"name":"Clinical genitourinary cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142130021","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Outcomes of Intraoperative Frozen Section Examination of Surgical Resection Margins of the Penis in Penile Cancer 阴茎癌手术切除边缘的术中冷冻切片检查结果。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102189
Karl H. Pang , Mohammad Yunis , Aiman Haider , Alex Freeman , Paul Hadway , Raj Nigam , Rowland Rees , Asif Muneer , Hussain M. Alnajjar

Introduction

Frozen section examination (FSE) of the tumor resection margins is important during penile-preserving surgery (PPS) in penile cancer. The margin status will impact on how much penile or urethral tissue is excised. We aim to evaluate the outcomes of intraoperative FSE of resection margins in PPS.

Patients and Methods

A retrospective analysis of patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) who underwent a FSE of resection margins between 2010 and 2022 was conducted. FSEs were compared with the final histopathological analysis and the Diagnostic Testing Accuracy (DTA): sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) were calculated.

Results

Overall, 137 FSE were performed. The median (IQR) age was 65 (53-75) years. 118 (86.1%) patients had negative FSE margins, 16 (11.7%) had positive FSE margins and 3 (2.2%) had equivocal (atypical cells) results. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy of penile FSE were 66.7%, 100%, 100%, 93.2% and 94% respectively. 18 patients underwent further resection in the same episode due to a positive or equivocal FSE and 12 (66.7%) achieved negative margins. Limitations include the retrospective nature of the study and lack of control arm to compare with.

Conclusions

Intraoperative FSE performed at our center for the assessment of penile SCC margins is 66.7% sensitive and 100% specific. FSE should be considered in PPS, as it's an essential and a reliable diagnostic tool in minimizing over-treatment.

简介:在阴茎癌保留阴茎手术(PPS)中,对肿瘤切除边缘进行冷冻切片检查(FSE)非常重要。边缘状态将影响切除阴茎或尿道组织的数量。我们的目的是评估 PPS 术中切除边缘 FSE 的效果:我们对2010年至2022年间接受切除边缘FSE检查的阴茎鳞状细胞癌(SCC)患者进行了回顾性分析。将FSE与最终的组织病理学分析进行比较,并计算诊断测试准确性(DTA):敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV):总共进行了 137 例 FSE。中位(IQR)年龄为 65(53-75)岁。118(86.1%)名患者的 FSE 边缘为阴性,16(11.7%)名患者的 FSE 边缘为阳性,3(2.2%)名患者的结果不明确(非典型细胞)。阴茎 FSE 的敏感性、特异性、PPV、NPV 和诊断准确性分别为 66.7%、100%、100%、93.2% 和 94%。18 名患者因 FSE 阳性或不明确而在同一次病例中接受了进一步的切除手术,其中 12 人(66.7%)达到了阴性边缘。研究的局限性包括研究的回顾性以及缺乏可与之比较的对照组:在本中心进行的术中 FSE 用于评估阴茎 SCC 边缘的敏感性为 66.7%,特异性为 100%。PPS患者应考虑使用FSE,因为它是减少过度治疗的重要而可靠的诊断工具。
{"title":"Outcomes of Intraoperative Frozen Section Examination of Surgical Resection Margins of the Penis in Penile Cancer","authors":"Karl H. Pang ,&nbsp;Mohammad Yunis ,&nbsp;Aiman Haider ,&nbsp;Alex Freeman ,&nbsp;Paul Hadway ,&nbsp;Raj Nigam ,&nbsp;Rowland Rees ,&nbsp;Asif Muneer ,&nbsp;Hussain M. Alnajjar","doi":"10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102189","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102189","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Frozen section examination (FSE) of the tumor resection margins is important during penile-preserving surgery (PPS) in penile cancer. The margin status will impact on how much penile or urethral tissue is excised. We aim to evaluate the outcomes of intraoperative FSE of resection margins in PPS.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>A retrospective analysis of patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) who underwent a FSE of resection margins between 2010 and 2022 was conducted. FSEs were compared with the final histopathological analysis and the Diagnostic Testing Accuracy (DTA): sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) were calculated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 137 FSE were performed. The median (IQR) age was 65 (53-75) years. 118 (86.1%) patients had negative FSE margins, 16 (11.7%) had positive FSE margins and 3 (2.2%) had equivocal (atypical cells) results. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy of penile FSE were 66.7%, 100%, 100%, 93.2% and 94% respectively. 18 patients underwent further resection in the same episode due to a positive or equivocal FSE and 12 (66.7%) achieved negative margins. Limitations include the retrospective nature of the study and lack of control arm to compare with.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Intraoperative FSE performed at our center for the assessment of penile SCC margins is 66.7% sensitive and 100% specific. FSE should be considered in PPS, as it's an essential and a reliable diagnostic tool in minimizing over-treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10380,"journal":{"name":"Clinical genitourinary cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1558767324001605/pdfft?md5=e640323c2a0a00633a62331d420e165c&pid=1-s2.0-S1558767324001605-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142134749","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
National Trends in PSA Cancer Screening With Parallel Investigation of Colorectal Cancer Screening: An Analysis of the CDC Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System From 2012 to 2022 全国 PSA 癌症筛查趋势与结肠直肠癌筛查平行调查:2012 年至 2022 年美国疾病预防控制中心行为危险因素监测系统分析》(Analysis of the CDC Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System from 2012 to 2022)。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-03 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102178
Anh Nguyen , John Fastenau , Juhi Mehta , Evan Kovac , Robert E. Weiss

Introduction/Background

From 2012 to 2022 there have been numerous revisions in the United States Preventative Task Force guidelines for prostate cancer screening, including advising against PSA testing to allowing shared-decision making for men aged 55 to 69. We sought to observe trends in PSA testing rates in relation to the changing guidelines. Conversely, colorectal cancer screening recommendations remained consistent for patients aged 50-75 and we sought to use this as a comparison to observe the effect of differing guidelines.

Methods

The Centers for Disease Control Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System is a national database of surveys on health-related behaviors and preventive medical services. We extracted responses from 2012 to 2022 regarding both prostate and colorectal cancer screening. Our primary variable of interest was prostate cancer screening while colorectal cancer screening served as a positive control.

Results

Prostate cancer screening decreased among respondents from 70.1% in 2012 to 59.7% in 2022. However, there was a significant rebound in prostate cancer screening prevalence in 2022. In contrast, colorectal cancer screening rates steadily increased from 70.7% in 2012 to 78% in 2022. The annual percentage of men who had received prostate cancer screening was statistically different year to year.

Conclusions

Trends in the rate of screening for prostate and colorectal cancer appeared to adapt to the updated recommendations. However, further investigation regarding lower income levels, minority groups, and uninsured men are essential to address the social and racial disparities seen in prostate cancer screening. Efforts to promote shared-decision making may improve effective cancer screening.

导言/背景:从 2012 年到 2022 年,美国预防工作组对前列腺癌筛查指南进行了多次修订,包括建议 55 岁至 69 岁男性不要进行 PSA 检测,以及允许共同决策。我们试图观察与指南变化相关的 PSA 检测率趋势。相反,针对 50-75 岁患者的结直肠癌筛查建议保持一致,我们试图以此作为对比,观察不同指南的影响:美国疾病控制中心行为危险因素监测系统是一个关于健康相关行为和预防性医疗服务调查的全国性数据库。我们提取了 2012 年至 2022 年有关前列腺癌和结肠直肠癌筛查的回复。我们关注的主要变量是前列腺癌筛查,而大肠癌筛查则作为阳性对照:结果:受访者的前列腺癌筛查率从 2012 年的 70.1% 降至 2022 年的 59.7%。然而,前列腺癌筛查率在 2022 年出现了明显反弹。相比之下,结直肠癌筛查率从 2012 年的 70.7% 稳步上升至 2022 年的 78%。每年接受前列腺癌筛查的男性比例在统计上存在差异:前列腺癌和结肠直肠癌筛查率的趋势似乎与更新后的建议相适应。然而,要解决前列腺癌筛查中出现的社会和种族差异问题,必须对收入水平较低、少数民族群体和无保险男性进行进一步调查。努力促进共同决策可提高癌症筛查的有效性。
{"title":"National Trends in PSA Cancer Screening With Parallel Investigation of Colorectal Cancer Screening: An Analysis of the CDC Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System From 2012 to 2022","authors":"Anh Nguyen ,&nbsp;John Fastenau ,&nbsp;Juhi Mehta ,&nbsp;Evan Kovac ,&nbsp;Robert E. Weiss","doi":"10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102178","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102178","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction/Background</h3><p>From 2012 to 2022 there have been numerous revisions in the United States Preventative Task Force guidelines for prostate cancer screening, including advising against PSA testing to allowing shared-decision making for men aged 55 to 69. We sought to observe trends in PSA testing rates in relation to the changing guidelines. Conversely, colorectal cancer screening recommendations remained consistent for patients aged 50-75 and we sought to use this as a comparison to observe the effect of differing guidelines.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The Centers for Disease Control Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System is a national database of surveys on health-related behaviors and preventive medical services. We extracted responses from 2012 to 2022 regarding both prostate and colorectal cancer screening. Our primary variable of interest was prostate cancer screening while colorectal cancer screening served as a positive control.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Prostate cancer screening decreased among respondents from 70.1% in 2012 to 59.7% in 2022. However, there was a significant rebound in prostate cancer screening prevalence in 2022. In contrast, colorectal cancer screening rates steadily increased from 70.7% in 2012 to 78% in 2022. The annual percentage of men who had received prostate cancer screening was statistically different year to year.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Trends in the rate of screening for prostate and colorectal cancer appeared to adapt to the updated recommendations. However, further investigation regarding lower income levels, minority groups, and uninsured men are essential to address the social and racial disparities seen in prostate cancer screening. Efforts to promote shared-decision making may improve effective cancer screening.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10380,"journal":{"name":"Clinical genitourinary cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1558767324001496/pdfft?md5=f44144ce608a094174732288f5ef8b98&pid=1-s2.0-S1558767324001496-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142147165","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Italian Registry on Rare Urological Tumors (Meet-URO-23): The First Analysis on Collecting Duct Carcinoma of the Kidney 意大利罕见泌尿系统肿瘤登记处(Meet-URO-23):首次分析肾集合管癌。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102186
Giulia Claire Giudice , Marco Maruzzo , Elena Verzoni , Giuseppe Procopio , Davide Bimbatti , Pierangela Sepe , Francesca Maines , Francesco Grillone , Alessia Cavo , Matteo Santoni , Nadia Cordua , Giovanna Pecoraro , Veronica Prati , Marilena Di Napoli , Eli Ollari , Giuseppe Caruso , Nicola Simoni , Davide Campobasso , Sebastiano Buti

Introduction

Rare genitourinary tumors are lacking of randomized and observational data. We aimed to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with collecting duct carcinoma (CDC) through the Meet-URO 23/I-RARE database.

Materials and Methods

We performed a multicentric retrospective-prospective study within the Meet-URO network, enrolling patients from March 2021 (retrospectively up from 2011) until March 2023. The primary objective was to describe the clinical characteristics of patients with CDC, the secondary objectives were to assess the oncological outcomes in terms of relapse-free survival (RFS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR) to treatment.

Results

37 patients with CDC were enrolled. Four patients underwent only surgery, 33 received first-line systemic therapy. Median OS was 22.1 months (95% CI, 8.9-31.9). Median RFS for patients with localized disease at onset (n = 30) was 3.7 months (95% CI, 1.9-12.8), median PFS for first-line treatment was 3.3 months (95% CI, 2.7-9.9), with an ORR of 27%. Female sex and good performance status (PS) were associated with longer PFS (P = .072 and P < .01, respectively) and OS (P = .030 and P = .141, respectively).

Conclusions

Patients with CDC had dismal prognosis, with scarce benefit from the available treatments. Female sex and good PS seemed to be associated with better prognosis.

导言:罕见的泌尿生殖系统肿瘤缺乏随机和观察数据。我们旨在通过 Meet-URO 23/I-RARE 数据库描述集合管癌(CDC)患者的临床特征和预后:我们在 Meet-URO 网络内开展了一项多中心回顾性-前瞻性研究,从 2021 年 3 月(从 2011 年开始回顾)至 2023 年 3 月招募患者。首要目标是描述 CDC 患者的临床特征,次要目标是评估无复发生存期(RFS)、无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和治疗客观反应率(ORR)等肿瘤学结果:37 名 CDC 患者入选。结果:37 名 CDC 患者入选,其中 4 名患者只接受了手术治疗,33 名患者接受了一线系统治疗。中位OS为22.1个月(95% CI,8.9-31.9)。发病时局部病变患者(n = 30)的中位RFS为3.7个月(95% CI,1.9-12.8),一线治疗的中位PFS为3.3个月(95% CI,2.7-9.9),ORR为27%。女性性别和良好的表现状态(PS)与较长的PFS(P = .072,P < .01)和OS(P = .030,P = .141)相关:结论:CDC患者的预后很差,现有的治疗方法几乎无法使其获益。女性和良好的 PS 似乎与较好的预后有关。
{"title":"Italian Registry on Rare Urological Tumors (Meet-URO-23): The First Analysis on Collecting Duct Carcinoma of the Kidney","authors":"Giulia Claire Giudice ,&nbsp;Marco Maruzzo ,&nbsp;Elena Verzoni ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Procopio ,&nbsp;Davide Bimbatti ,&nbsp;Pierangela Sepe ,&nbsp;Francesca Maines ,&nbsp;Francesco Grillone ,&nbsp;Alessia Cavo ,&nbsp;Matteo Santoni ,&nbsp;Nadia Cordua ,&nbsp;Giovanna Pecoraro ,&nbsp;Veronica Prati ,&nbsp;Marilena Di Napoli ,&nbsp;Eli Ollari ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Caruso ,&nbsp;Nicola Simoni ,&nbsp;Davide Campobasso ,&nbsp;Sebastiano Buti","doi":"10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102186","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102186","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Rare genitourinary tumors are lacking of randomized and observational data. We aimed to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with collecting duct carcinoma (CDC) through the Meet-URO 23/I-RARE database.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>We performed a multicentric retrospective-prospective study within the Meet-URO network, enrolling patients from March 2021 (retrospectively up from 2011) until March 2023. The primary objective was to describe the clinical characteristics of patients with CDC, the secondary objectives were to assess the oncological outcomes in terms of relapse-free survival (RFS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR) to treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>37 patients with CDC were enrolled. Four patients underwent only surgery, 33 received first-line systemic therapy. Median OS was 22.1 months (95% CI, 8.9-31.9). Median RFS for patients with localized disease at onset (n = 30) was 3.7 months (95% CI, 1.9-12.8), median PFS for first-line treatment was 3.3 months (95% CI, 2.7-9.9), with an ORR of 27%. Female sex and good performance status (PS) were associated with longer PFS (<em>P</em> = .072 and <em>P</em> &lt; .01, respectively) and OS (<em>P</em> = .030 and <em>P</em> = .141, respectively).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Patients with CDC had dismal prognosis, with scarce benefit from the available treatments. Female sex and good PS seemed to be associated with better prognosis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10380,"journal":{"name":"Clinical genitourinary cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1558767324001575/pdfft?md5=14fc6177345cb20a806b96fbf4d441a5&pid=1-s2.0-S1558767324001575-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142047680","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Sequential or Combination Therapy? 转移性前列腺癌:序贯疗法还是联合疗法?
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-31 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102182
Lorenzo Dottorini, Fausto Petrelli
{"title":"Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Sequential or Combination Therapy?","authors":"Lorenzo Dottorini,&nbsp;Fausto Petrelli","doi":"10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102182","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102182","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10380,"journal":{"name":"Clinical genitourinary cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142006834","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Clinical genitourinary cancer
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1