Background
Digital subtraction angiography (DSA), the standard for postoperative evaluation following flow diverter (FD) implantation, is invasive and associated with potential complications. Although time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (TOF-MRA) is effective, normal blood flow may be misinterpreted as T1-weighted hyperintense thrombi. T1 volumetric isotropic turbo spin-echo acquisition black-blood magnetic resonance imaging (T1-VISTA-BB MRI) can differentiate thrombus from blood flow. We evaluate the utility of T1-VISTA-BB MRI for postoperative evaluation following FD implantation.
Methods
This retrospective study included 52 patients who underwent FD implantation alone. Scheduled DSA was performed at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. MRI examinations, including TOF-MRA and T1-VISTA-BB MRI, were defined as the most recent scans acquired within a specified time window relative to each DSA. The concordance with DSA was assessed. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy were calculated for each modality.
Results
At 6-month, T1-VISTA-BB MRI demonstrated significantly higher specificity (T1-VISTA-BB MRI vs TOF-MRA: 97.2 vs. 77.8 %, p = 0.028) and PPV (T1-VISTA-BB MRI vs TOF-MRA: 92.3 vs. 57.9 %, p = 0.049) compared with TOF-MRA. At 12-month, no significant differences were found between the two modalities.
Conclusions
T1-VISTA-BB MRI demonstrated significantly higher specificity and PPV compared with TOF-MRA at 6 months following FD implantation. This finding suggests it may serve as a useful and less invasive complementary tool to DSA for early postoperative evaluation. However, this advantage was not observed at the 12-month follow-up. Further studies involving larger cohorts and longer follow-up periods are required to validate these findings.
扫码关注我们
求助内容:
应助结果提醒方式:
