Purpose: To examine the state of the posterior vitreous in eyes with exudative age-related macular degeneration, AMD, non-exudative AMD and in normal eyes.
Study: This is a prospective, cross-sectional study.
Methods: B-scan ultrasonography and Optical Coherence Tomography, OCT were performed in 165 patients older than 65 years with any AMD and in 22 patients older than 65 years with normal eyes in order to diagnose the eyes with complete posterior vitreous detachment, PVD and the eyes with persistent central vitreomacular adhesion, VMA. All patients were selected from the outpatient clinic of the Ophthalmology Department in the University Hospital of Patras. Fundus Fluoroangiography, FFA was used in order to determine the development of exudative AMD from non-exudative AMD. Follow up time was 48 months.
Results: 16/171 eyes with exudative AMD (9.36%) had complete PVD, and the rest 155/171 (90.64%) had central VMA. Eleven of 138 eyes with non-exudative AMD (7.97%) had complete PVD and the remaining 127 eyes (92.03%) had central VMA. During the 48 months of the study, 28 eyes, all with central VMA progressed to exudative AMD.
Conclusion: Vitreomacular adhesion is associated with both exudative and non-exudative AMD. Progression of the non-exudative eyes to exudative AMD seems to be lower in eyes with complete PVD. On the other hand, the progression of normal eyes to exudative AMD appears to be independent of the posterior vitreous status. Larger and longer studies need to replicate these findings and support the potential of a protective role of complete posterior vitreous detachment in the evolution of the disease.
{"title":"Posterior Vitreous Detachment and Its Role in the Evolution of Dry to Wet Age Related Macular Degeneration.","authors":"Anastasia Bakaliou, Constantine Georgakopoulos, Miltiadis Tsilimbaris, Nikolaos Farmakakis","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S403242","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S403242","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine the state of the posterior vitreous in eyes with exudative age-related macular degeneration, AMD, non-exudative AMD and in normal eyes.</p><p><strong>Study: </strong>This is a prospective, cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>B-scan ultrasonography and Optical Coherence Tomography, OCT were performed in 165 patients older than 65 years with any AMD and in 22 patients older than 65 years with normal eyes in order to diagnose the eyes with complete posterior vitreous detachment, PVD and the eyes with persistent central vitreomacular adhesion, VMA. All patients were selected from the outpatient clinic of the Ophthalmology Department in the University Hospital of Patras. Fundus Fluoroangiography, FFA was used in order to determine the development of exudative AMD from non-exudative AMD. Follow up time was 48 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>16/171 eyes with exudative AMD (9.36%) had complete PVD, and the rest 155/171 (90.64%) had central VMA. Eleven of 138 eyes with non-exudative AMD (7.97%) had complete PVD and the remaining 127 eyes (92.03%) had central VMA. During the 48 months of the study, 28 eyes, all with central VMA progressed to exudative AMD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Vitreomacular adhesion is associated with both exudative and non-exudative AMD. Progression of the non-exudative eyes to exudative AMD seems to be lower in eyes with complete PVD. On the other hand, the progression of normal eyes to exudative AMD appears to be independent of the posterior vitreous status. Larger and longer studies need to replicate these findings and support the potential of a protective role of complete posterior vitreous detachment in the evolution of the disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":10442,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology","volume":"17 ","pages":"879-885"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8d/dd/opth-17-879.PMC10029933.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9163981","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: To study visual recovery and identify the factors that may affect it in patients with ethambutol-induced optic neuropathy (EON).
Patients and methods: Medical charts of patients who developed optic neuropathy after ethambutol (EMB) treatment for tuberculosis infection were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic details and clinical data were examined to assess visual recovery after discontinuation of ethambutol treatment. The univariate and multivariate relationships between various factors and visual recovery were evaluated using regression analysis.
Results: Of 5394 patients diagnosed with tuberculosis infection and treated with EMB, 23 patients (0.43%) were diagnosed with EON. Logistic regression analysis found that female sex was the categorical factor significantly associated with good visual recovery with an odds ratio of 12.0 (95% confidence interval 1.56, 92.29; p = 0.02), while linear regression analysis identified good initial visual acuity as the numerical factor significantly related with it (p < 0.001). After adjustment with multivariate analysis, initial visual acuity was found to be the only significant factor associated with visual recovery. All patients with initial visual acuity of better than 20/200 at first visit achieved good visual recovery.
Conclusion: The incidence of EON in patients treated with EMB was 0.43% in this hospital-based study. Good visual recovery was noted in 39.13% of these patients, and initial visual acuity was the factor that affected visual recovery. It is recommended that patients on EMB have regular screening by an ophthalmologist for early detection of the disease, and if it is discovered, that the use of the drug be immediately discontinued in order to prevent potentially devastating visual loss.
{"title":"Factors Affecting Visual Recovery in Patients with Ethambutol-Induced Optic Neuropathy.","authors":"Supaporn Srithawatpong, Pareena Chaitanuwong, Yosanan Yospaiboon","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S401916","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S401916","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To study visual recovery and identify the factors that may affect it in patients with ethambutol-induced optic neuropathy (EON).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Medical charts of patients who developed optic neuropathy after ethambutol (EMB) treatment for tuberculosis infection were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic details and clinical data were examined to assess visual recovery after discontinuation of ethambutol treatment. The univariate and multivariate relationships between various factors and visual recovery were evaluated using regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 5394 patients diagnosed with tuberculosis infection and treated with EMB, 23 patients (0.43%) were diagnosed with EON. Logistic regression analysis found that female sex was the categorical factor significantly associated with good visual recovery with an odds ratio of 12.0 (95% confidence interval 1.56, 92.29; p = 0.02), while linear regression analysis identified good initial visual acuity as the numerical factor significantly related with it (p < 0.001). After adjustment with multivariate analysis, initial visual acuity was found to be the only significant factor associated with visual recovery. All patients with initial visual acuity of better than 20/200 at first visit achieved good visual recovery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The incidence of EON in patients treated with EMB was 0.43% in this hospital-based study. Good visual recovery was noted in 39.13% of these patients, and initial visual acuity was the factor that affected visual recovery. It is recommended that patients on EMB have regular screening by an ophthalmologist for early detection of the disease, and if it is discovered, that the use of the drug be immediately discontinued in order to prevent potentially devastating visual loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":10442,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology","volume":"17 ","pages":"545-554"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3f/5a/opth-17-545.PMC9925387.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9291901","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Christian Nilsen, Per Graae Jensen, Morten Gundersen, Øygunn A Utheim, Bjørn Gjerdrum, Kjell Gunnar Gundersen, David Jahanlu, Rick Potvin
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of inter-eye osmolarity differences in relation to dry eye symptoms and other non-osmolar signs of dry eye disease.
Patients and methods: One hundred ninety one participants who attended a larger interventional study of dry eye disease prior to and after cataract surgery were analyzed for dry eye disease (DED). Dry eye diagnostics were performed for all subjects according to the DEWS II criteria: tear osmolarity was collected from both eyes with the TearLab system, non-invasive Tear film break up time (NIKBUT) was obtained on the test eye with Keratograph and ocular surface staining (OSS) was evaluated using the Oxford schema. The Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire was used to assess symptoms. Inter-eye osmolarity greater than 8, which is considered as a sign of DED according to the TearLab user manual, was evaluated and compared with other non-osmolar signs of DED.
Results: The 191 subjects were divided into three groups according to osmolarity measurements. Sixty-five subjects had normal osmolarity (below 308 mOsmol/L in both eyes and less than 9 mOsmol/L difference between the eyes), 107 had high osmolarity (308 mOsmol/L or higher in one of the eyes) and 19 had an inter-eye difference >8 mOsmol/L or higher, with neither eye having osmolarity higher than 307 mOsmol/L. Signs and symptoms in this last group were not correlated with the high osmolarity group or the normal group, though they appeared more similar to the normal group.
Conclusion: The diagnostic value of inter-eye osmolarity difference in predicting symptoms or other non-osmolar signs of dry eyes appears weak. Our study suggests that the criterion of an inter-eye difference of 8 mOsmol/L is not a useful cut-off for diagnosing dry eyes based on osmolarity.
{"title":"The Significance of Inter-Eye Osmolarity Difference in Dry Eye Diagnostics.","authors":"Christian Nilsen, Per Graae Jensen, Morten Gundersen, Øygunn A Utheim, Bjørn Gjerdrum, Kjell Gunnar Gundersen, David Jahanlu, Rick Potvin","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S402556","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S402556","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of inter-eye osmolarity differences in relation to dry eye symptoms and other non-osmolar signs of dry eye disease.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>One hundred ninety one participants who attended a larger interventional study of dry eye disease prior to and after cataract surgery were analyzed for dry eye disease (DED). Dry eye diagnostics were performed for all subjects according to the DEWS II criteria: tear osmolarity was collected from both eyes with the TearLab system, non-invasive Tear film break up time (NIKBUT) was obtained on the test eye with Keratograph and ocular surface staining (OSS) was evaluated using the Oxford schema. The Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire was used to assess symptoms. Inter-eye osmolarity greater than 8, which is considered as a sign of DED according to the TearLab user manual, was evaluated and compared with other non-osmolar signs of DED.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 191 subjects were divided into three groups according to osmolarity measurements. Sixty-five subjects had normal osmolarity (below 308 mOsmol/L in both eyes and less than 9 mOsmol/L difference between the eyes), 107 had high osmolarity (308 mOsmol/L or higher in one of the eyes) and 19 had an inter-eye difference >8 mOsmol/L or higher, with neither eye having osmolarity higher than 307 mOsmol/L. Signs and symptoms in this last group were not correlated with the high osmolarity group or the normal group, though they appeared more similar to the normal group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The diagnostic value of inter-eye osmolarity difference in predicting symptoms or other non-osmolar signs of dry eyes appears weak. Our study suggests that the criterion of an inter-eye difference of 8 mOsmol/L is not a useful cut-off for diagnosing dry eyes based on osmolarity.</p>","PeriodicalId":10442,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology","volume":"17 ","pages":"829-835"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2d/8f/opth-17-829.PMC10015967.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9514514","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Andrii Ruban, Beáta Éva Petrovski, Goran Petrovski, Lyubomyr M Lytvynchuk
you for your interest in the article and the comments you made regarding our gas tamponade technique. The volume of this article did not allow us to consider in detail the features of gas tamponade and the analysis of postoperative IOP increase, so we will do our best to answer your comments
{"title":"Comments on: Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling and Gas Tamponade for Full-Thickness Macular Holes of Different Etiology - Is It Still Relevant? [Response to Letter].","authors":"Andrii Ruban, Beáta Éva Petrovski, Goran Petrovski, Lyubomyr M Lytvynchuk","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S402222","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S402222","url":null,"abstract":"you for your interest in the article and the comments you made regarding our gas tamponade technique. The volume of this article did not allow us to consider in detail the features of gas tamponade and the analysis of postoperative IOP increase, so we will do our best to answer your comments","PeriodicalId":10442,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology","volume":"17 ","pages":"103-105"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a2/28/opth-17-103.PMC9831524.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9091812","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Patrick C Staropoli, Harsh V Moolani, Abdelrahman M Elhusseiny, Harry W Flynn, William E Smiddy
Purpose: Identify the long-term rate of fellow eye full-thickness macular hole (FTMH) development.
Patients and methods: In this single site, single provider retrospective consecutive case series, idiopathic FTMH patients who underwent surgery from 2003 to 2014 who also had at least 5 years of follow-up information within our electronic medical record (EMR) which was started in 2014 were identified. Cases with secondary causes (ie, trauma), high myopia, bilateral FTMH on presentation, previous retinal surgery, retinal breaks, or intraocular inflammation were excluded. Demographics, medical and ocular history, refractive error, phakic status, best corrected visual acuity, follow-up duration, surgical technique, single operation anatomic success, and reoperations were recorded.
Results: The rate of fellow eye FTMH was 2.6% (2/77) at 1 year, 5.2% (4/77) at 3 years, 9.1% (6/66) at 6 years, and 9.1% (7/77) as of final follow up. There were 2 cases by year 1, 2 additional cases by year 3, 2 additional cases by year 6, and 1 additional case reported thereafter. The average follow up was 11.1 ± 4.5 years. There was no significant difference in visual outcomes between primary eyes and fellow eyes. There was no significant difference in gender, age, ocular comorbidities, refractive error, phakic status, and visual acuity between the unilateral and bilateral groups.
Conclusion: The rate of FTMH in the fellow eye was low but significant, increased during long-term follow up, and may stabilize after 6 years.
{"title":"Rates of Fellow Eye Macular Hole Development During Long Term Follow-Up.","authors":"Patrick C Staropoli, Harsh V Moolani, Abdelrahman M Elhusseiny, Harry W Flynn, William E Smiddy","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S394933","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S394933","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Identify the long-term rate of fellow eye full-thickness macular hole (FTMH) development.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In this single site, single provider retrospective consecutive case series, idiopathic FTMH patients who underwent surgery from 2003 to 2014 who also had at least 5 years of follow-up information within our electronic medical record (EMR) which was started in 2014 were identified. Cases with secondary causes (ie, trauma), high myopia, bilateral FTMH on presentation, previous retinal surgery, retinal breaks, or intraocular inflammation were excluded. Demographics, medical and ocular history, refractive error, phakic status, best corrected visual acuity, follow-up duration, surgical technique, single operation anatomic success, and reoperations were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rate of fellow eye FTMH was 2.6% (2/77) at 1 year, 5.2% (4/77) at 3 years, 9.1% (6/66) at 6 years, and 9.1% (7/77) as of final follow up. There were 2 cases by year 1, 2 additional cases by year 3, 2 additional cases by year 6, and 1 additional case reported thereafter. The average follow up was 11.1 ± 4.5 years. There was no significant difference in visual outcomes between primary eyes and fellow eyes. There was no significant difference in gender, age, ocular comorbidities, refractive error, phakic status, and visual acuity between the unilateral and bilateral groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The rate of FTMH in the fellow eye was low but significant, increased during long-term follow up, and may stabilize after 6 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":10442,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology","volume":"17 ","pages":"47-52"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/61/83/opth-17-47.PMC9830953.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9091813","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ploysai Rujkorakarn, Michael J Margolis, Diana Morvey, Yujia Zhou, C Stephen Foster
Purpose: To assess the possible correlation of anti-retinal antibody titers and number of anti-retinal antibodies with outcome measurements including visual acuity, subjective vision loss, visual field, and electroretinography in patients with autoimmune retinopathy.
Patients and methods: Patients with autoimmune retinopathy who underwent anti-retinal antibody testing at least twice during their follow-up were enrolled. Anti-retinal antibody titers and numbers were grouped as improved, stable, or worsened. Outcomes included Snellen visual acuity, patient-reported vision loss, Humphrey visual field mean deviations, and electroretinography parameters.
Results: Thirty-one eyes among 16 patients with autoimmune retinopathy were included. Between-group analyses of visual acuity, subjective vision loss, visual field, and electroretinography outcomes did not reveal any significant differences by anti-retinal antibody titer or number group at a 95% confidence interval.
Conclusion: Changes in anti-retinal antibody titers or numbers were not associated with any vision outcome. Repeated anti-retinal antibody testing may be unnecessary after diagnosis of autoimmune retinopathy and detection of an anti-retinal antibody.
{"title":"Limited Clinical Value of Anti-Retinal Antibody Titers and Numbers in Autoimmune Retinopathy.","authors":"Ploysai Rujkorakarn, Michael J Margolis, Diana Morvey, Yujia Zhou, C Stephen Foster","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S404826","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S404826","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the possible correlation of anti-retinal antibody titers and number of anti-retinal antibodies with outcome measurements including visual acuity, subjective vision loss, visual field, and electroretinography in patients with autoimmune retinopathy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single-center, retrospective cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Patients with autoimmune retinopathy who underwent anti-retinal antibody testing at least twice during their follow-up were enrolled. Anti-retinal antibody titers and numbers were grouped as improved, stable, or worsened. Outcomes included Snellen visual acuity, patient-reported vision loss, Humphrey visual field mean deviations, and electroretinography parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one eyes among 16 patients with autoimmune retinopathy were included. Between-group analyses of visual acuity, subjective vision loss, visual field, and electroretinography outcomes did not reveal any significant differences by anti-retinal antibody titer or number group at a 95% confidence interval.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Changes in anti-retinal antibody titers or numbers were not associated with any vision outcome. Repeated anti-retinal antibody testing may be unnecessary after diagnosis of autoimmune retinopathy and detection of an anti-retinal antibody.</p>","PeriodicalId":10442,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology","volume":"17 ","pages":"749-755"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3e/95/opth-17-749.PMC10007864.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9106557","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Stanton Heydinger, Rafael Ufret-Vincenty, Zachary M Robertson, Yu-Guang He, Angeline L Wang
Purpose: To compare the outcomes of primary uncomplicated rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair using pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), scleral buckling (SB), or combined scleral buckling with vitrectomy (SB/PPV).
Patients and methods: Single-institution, retrospective, observational study of 179 patients with primary RRD managed at a large academic hospital system. We excluded patients with less than 6 months of follow-up, previous vitrectomy or buckle, giant retinal tears, aphakia, recurrent forms of RRD, or extensive proliferative vitreoretinopathy (Grade C or worse) documented on exam or requiring membrane peel. Outcome measures included primary anatomical success at 6 months, functional success defined as BCVA ≥ 20/200, and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) using logMAR scoring. Subgroup analysis was performed in the following patient groups: phakic, pseudophakic, inferior detachments, and prior pneumatic retinopexy.
Results: Primary anatomical success was achieved in 145 of 179 eyes (81.0%), with SB/PPV showing a significantly greater success rate (p = 0.046) when compared to SB and PPV. Functional success was achieved in 137 of the 145 anatomically successful eyes (94.5%), with values ranging between 92% and 97% amongst the interventions (p = 0.552). No difference was found in final BCVA (p = 0.367). Patients with inferior detachment had an odds ratio of 2.15 for primary anatomic failure. Prior pneumatic retinopexy did not significantly affect any of the primary outcomes.
Conclusion: SB/PPV yielded a significantly better primary anatomical success rate when compared to SB and PPV. Functional success and final BCVA was similar amongst the interventions. Inferior detachments were associated with worse primary anatomic outcomes. Prior pneumatic retinopexy did not significantly affect surgical outcomes.
{"title":"Comparison of Surgical Outcomes for Uncomplicated Primary Retinal Detachment Repair.","authors":"Stanton Heydinger, Rafael Ufret-Vincenty, Zachary M Robertson, Yu-Guang He, Angeline L Wang","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S405913","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S405913","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the outcomes of primary uncomplicated rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair using pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), scleral buckling (SB), or combined scleral buckling with vitrectomy (SB/PPV).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Single-institution, retrospective, observational study of 179 patients with primary RRD managed at a large academic hospital system. We excluded patients with less than 6 months of follow-up, previous vitrectomy or buckle, giant retinal tears, aphakia, recurrent forms of RRD, or extensive proliferative vitreoretinopathy (Grade C or worse) documented on exam or requiring membrane peel. Outcome measures included primary anatomical success at 6 months, functional success defined as BCVA ≥ 20/200, and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) using logMAR scoring. Subgroup analysis was performed in the following patient groups: phakic, pseudophakic, inferior detachments, and prior pneumatic retinopexy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Primary anatomical success was achieved in 145 of 179 eyes (81.0%), with SB/PPV showing a significantly greater success rate (p = 0.046) when compared to SB and PPV. Functional success was achieved in 137 of the 145 anatomically successful eyes (94.5%), with values ranging between 92% and 97% amongst the interventions (p = 0.552). No difference was found in final BCVA (p = 0.367). Patients with inferior detachment had an odds ratio of 2.15 for primary anatomic failure. Prior pneumatic retinopexy did not significantly affect any of the primary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SB/PPV yielded a significantly better primary anatomical success rate when compared to SB and PPV. Functional success and final BCVA was similar amongst the interventions. Inferior detachments were associated with worse primary anatomic outcomes. Prior pneumatic retinopexy did not significantly affect surgical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10442,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology","volume":"17 ","pages":"907-915"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9e/d7/opth-17-907.PMC10029931.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9163977","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Brian P Harrisberg, Alfred W Chua, Matthew J Chua, Amir Taher
Purpose: To assess the safety and efficacy of primary duet intraocular lens (IOL) procedure using an in-The-bag monofocal IOL and a sulcus-based multifocal reversible platform for cataract surgery. The visual outcomes were compared with a single in-The-bag multifocal IOL.
Patients and methods: Retrospective cohort study. Consecutive patients who underwent primary duet IOL procedures were compared with consecutive patients who underwent single multifocal IOL surgery. Primary outcomes were uncorrected distance and near visual acuities (UDVA and UNVA), refraction and spherical equivalent data. Secondary outcomes included surgical complications.
Results: The study group consisted of 32 eyes (22 toric IOLs) whilst the control group had 57 eyes (29 toric IOLs). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups on post-operative 1-month and 1-year UDVA (p=0.1522 and 0.4926, respectively) and UNVA (p=0.1248 and 0.2738, respectively). There were no statistically significant differences in the postoperative 1-month spherical equivalent within ± 0.5 diopter (p=0.1891). Postoperative intraocular pressure spikes were observed on day-1 in both groups, with most returned to their baseline at 1-month and all were normal at 1-year post surgery. There were no statistically significant differences in intraocular pressure between the two groups on day-1, 1-month and 1-year after surgery (p=0.6421). There were no statistically significant differences in the IOL axis deviation from the intended axis in the toric subgroup analysis (p=0.5843).
Conclusion: Primary duet IOL procedure is equally effective and safe in correcting distance and near vision when compared with single multifocal IOL in the capsular bag.
{"title":"Comparison of Primary Duet Lens Procedures: In-The-Bag Monofocal with Sulcus Multifocal, and Standard Single Multifocal Lens for Cataract Surgery.","authors":"Brian P Harrisberg, Alfred W Chua, Matthew J Chua, Amir Taher","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S396472","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S396472","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the safety and efficacy of primary duet intraocular lens (IOL) procedure using an in-The-bag monofocal IOL and a sulcus-based multifocal reversible platform for cataract surgery. The visual outcomes were compared with a single in-The-bag multifocal IOL.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort study. Consecutive patients who underwent primary duet IOL procedures were compared with consecutive patients who underwent single multifocal IOL surgery. Primary outcomes were uncorrected distance and near visual acuities (UDVA and UNVA), refraction and spherical equivalent data. Secondary outcomes included surgical complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study group consisted of 32 eyes (22 toric IOLs) whilst the control group had 57 eyes (29 toric IOLs). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups on post-operative 1-month and 1-year UDVA (<i>p</i>=0.1522 and 0.4926, respectively) and UNVA (<i>p</i>=0.1248 and 0.2738, respectively). There were no statistically significant differences in the postoperative 1-month spherical equivalent within ± 0.5 diopter (<i>p</i>=0.1891). Postoperative intraocular pressure spikes were observed on day-1 in both groups, with most returned to their baseline at 1-month and all were normal at 1-year post surgery. There were no statistically significant differences in intraocular pressure between the two groups on day-1, 1-month and 1-year after surgery (<i>p</i>=0.6421). There were no statistically significant differences in the IOL axis deviation from the intended axis in the toric subgroup analysis (<i>p</i>=0.5843).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Primary duet IOL procedure is equally effective and safe in correcting distance and near vision when compared with single multifocal IOL in the capsular bag.</p>","PeriodicalId":10442,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology","volume":"17 ","pages":"273-282"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3e/d0/opth-17-273.PMC9869909.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10623456","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ashok Sharma, Namrata Sharma, Sayan Basu, Rajan Sharma, Shruti Aggarwal, Parul Chawla Gupta, Jagat Ram, Verinder S Nirankari
Corneal perforations are ophthalmological emergencies which can have serious and detrimental consequences, if not managed timely and appropriately. These are a significant cause of ocular morbidity and can result in decreased vision, blindness, and even loss of the eye. Corneal perforations can be managed using a range of treatment approaches, including temporary solutions such as the application of corneal glue and bandage contact lens, as well as definitive treatment such as corneal transplantation. Tissue glues/adhesives were developed as substitutes for sutures in ophthalmic surgery. Unlike sutures, these glues are associated with shorter overall surgical times and reduced inflammation, thus improving postoperative comfort without compromising wound strength. The available tissue adhesives can be broadly classified into two types: synthetic (eg, cyanoacrylate derivatives) and biological (eg, fibrin glue). Cyanoacrylate glue is chiefly used as a corneal patch to manage acute corneal perforations and improve visual outcomes. Fibrin glue can be used instead of cyanoacrylate glue in many conditions with the benefits of reduced conjunctival and corneal inflammation and reaction. Apart from this, each type of adhesive is distinct in terms of its benefits as well as limitations and is accordingly used for different indications. The present review focuses on the two main types of tissue adhesives, their applications in the management of corneal perforations, the associated complications, safety and efficacy data related to their use available in the literature and the need for newer adhesives in this field.
{"title":"Tissue Adhesives for the Management of Corneal Perforations and Challenging Corneal Conditions.","authors":"Ashok Sharma, Namrata Sharma, Sayan Basu, Rajan Sharma, Shruti Aggarwal, Parul Chawla Gupta, Jagat Ram, Verinder S Nirankari","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S394454","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S394454","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Corneal perforations are ophthalmological emergencies which can have serious and detrimental consequences, if not managed timely and appropriately. These are a significant cause of ocular morbidity and can result in decreased vision, blindness, and even loss of the eye. Corneal perforations can be managed using a range of treatment approaches, including temporary solutions such as the application of corneal glue and bandage contact lens, as well as definitive treatment such as corneal transplantation. Tissue glues/adhesives were developed as substitutes for sutures in ophthalmic surgery. Unlike sutures, these glues are associated with shorter overall surgical times and reduced inflammation, thus improving postoperative comfort without compromising wound strength. The available tissue adhesives can be broadly classified into two types: synthetic (eg, cyanoacrylate derivatives) and biological (eg, fibrin glue). Cyanoacrylate glue is chiefly used as a corneal patch to manage acute corneal perforations and improve visual outcomes. Fibrin glue can be used instead of cyanoacrylate glue in many conditions with the benefits of reduced conjunctival and corneal inflammation and reaction. Apart from this, each type of adhesive is distinct in terms of its benefits as well as limitations and is accordingly used for different indications. The present review focuses on the two main types of tissue adhesives, their applications in the management of corneal perforations, the associated complications, safety and efficacy data related to their use available in the literature and the need for newer adhesives in this field.</p>","PeriodicalId":10442,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology","volume":"17 ","pages":"209-223"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/35/f6/opth-17-209.PMC9851054.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10636123","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Neesurg Mehta, Rodney D Fong, Machelle Wilson, Kareem Moussa, Parisa Emami-Naeini, Ala Moshiri, Glenn Yiu, Susanna S Park
Purpose: To evaluate real-world experience using intravitreal brolucizumab (IVBr), alone or in combination with aflibercept, in eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) treated previously with other inhibitors of VEGF (anti-VEGF).
Methods: This was a retrospective study of all eyes with nAMD treated with IVBr on a treat-and-extend protocol at a single center. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), optical coherence tomography (OCT) at baseline and final visit, and drug-related adverse events were analyzed. Eyes with recurrent macular fluid on IVBr every 8 weeks were treated with a combination therapy alternating between IVBr and aflibercept every month.
Results: Among 52 eyes (40 patients) on IVBr, all had been previously treated with other anti-VEGF therapy, with 73% having persistent macular fluid. After a mean follow-up of 46.2±27.4 weeks on IVBr, the mean treatment interval for intravitreal therapy increased to 8.8±2.1 weeks on IVBr from a baseline of 6.1±3.1 weeks (p<0.001). Macular fluid decreased and BCVA was stable/improved in 61.5% of eyes on IVBr. Ten eyes with increased macular fluid on IVBr monotherapy when extended to every 8 weeks were treated with combination therapy alternating between IVBr and aflibercept every 4 weeks. In these eyes, 80% had improved macular fluid on OCT and 70% stable or improved BCVA after a median follow-up of 53 weeks on combination therapy. Mild intraocular inflammation developed in four eyes, all occurring on IVBr monotherapy, and none had associated vision loss.
Conclusion: In the real world, IVBr used to treat eyes with nAMD previously treated with other anti-VEGF therapies appears to be well tolerated and associated with an improvement in macular fluid, stabilization of BCVA, and/or increase in intravitreal treatment interval. Combination therapy alternating between IVBr and aflibercept monthly appears to be well tolerated and can be considered for eyes with macular fluid on IVBr every 8 weeks.
{"title":"Real-World Experience Using Intravitreal Brolucizumab Alone or in Combination with Aflibercept in the Management of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.","authors":"Neesurg Mehta, Rodney D Fong, Machelle Wilson, Kareem Moussa, Parisa Emami-Naeini, Ala Moshiri, Glenn Yiu, Susanna S Park","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S399590","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S399590","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate real-world experience using intravitreal brolucizumab (IVBr), alone or in combination with aflibercept, in eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) treated previously with other inhibitors of VEGF (anti-VEGF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study of all eyes with nAMD treated with IVBr on a treat-and-extend protocol at a single center. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), optical coherence tomography (OCT) at baseline and final visit, and drug-related adverse events were analyzed. Eyes with recurrent macular fluid on IVBr every 8 weeks were treated with a combination therapy alternating between IVBr and aflibercept every month.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 52 eyes (40 patients) on IVBr, all had been previously treated with other anti-VEGF therapy, with 73% having persistent macular fluid. After a mean follow-up of 46.2±27.4 weeks on IVBr, the mean treatment interval for intravitreal therapy increased to 8.8±2.1 weeks on IVBr from a baseline of 6.1±3.1 weeks (<i>p</i><0.001). Macular fluid decreased and BCVA was stable/improved in 61.5% of eyes on IVBr. Ten eyes with increased macular fluid on IVBr monotherapy when extended to every 8 weeks were treated with combination therapy alternating between IVBr and aflibercept every 4 weeks. In these eyes, 80% had improved macular fluid on OCT and 70% stable or improved BCVA after a median follow-up of 53 weeks on combination therapy. Mild intraocular inflammation developed in four eyes, all occurring on IVBr monotherapy, and none had associated vision loss.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the real world, IVBr used to treat eyes with nAMD previously treated with other anti-VEGF therapies appears to be well tolerated and associated with an improvement in macular fluid, stabilization of BCVA, and/or increase in intravitreal treatment interval. Combination therapy alternating between IVBr and aflibercept monthly appears to be well tolerated and can be considered for eyes with macular fluid on IVBr every 8 weeks.</p>","PeriodicalId":10442,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology","volume":"17 ","pages":"657-665"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/10/ad/opth-17-657.PMC9984903.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10861159","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}