首页 > 最新文献

Clinical Research and Regulatory Affairs最新文献

英文 中文
Regulatory recommendations for clopidogrel: Focus on validation of a reliable bioanalytical method and its application to a bioequivalence study 氯吡格雷的监管建议:重点是验证可靠的生物分析方法及其在生物等效性研究中的应用
Pub Date : 2011-11-30 DOI: 10.3109/10601333.2011.619540
S. Dey, Kirti Kandhwal, Shabana Nazarudheen, Onkar Singh, S. Mukherjee, Sanjeev Mishra, S. Reyar, A. Khuroo, T. Monif
A rapid, simple, and sensitive liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometric (LC–MS/MS) method for the determination of clopidogrel in human plasma was developed and validated using clopidogrel-d4 as the internal standard (IS). The analyte and the IS were extracted from 500 µl aliquots of human plasma via solid phase extraction. The precursor to product ion transitions monitored for clopidogrel and IS were m/z 322.2 → 212.0 and 326.2 → 216.0, respectively. The method was fully validated for sensitivity, accuracy and precision, linearity, recovery, matrix effect, dilution integrity, and stability. The Linearity range was 20.4–10,772.6 pg/mL with mean correlation coefficient (r) ≥ 0.9977. The back conversion was also evaluated during method validation as per EMA recommendation. Results proved that clopidogrel was accurately and reliably estimated by the method without any evidence of back conversion of clopidogrel acid. The method was successfully applied to a bioequivalence study of 75 mg clopidogrel bisulfate tablet formulation in 32 healthy male volunteers under fasting conditions. The ratios of least-squares means (with 90% confidence intervals) for the pharmacokinetic parameters Cmax, AUC0–t and AUC0–α were 107.98% (94.52–123.35%), 100.25% (91.28–110.09%), and 100.49% (91.37–110.51%), respectively.
建立了一种快速、简便、灵敏的液相色谱串联质谱(LC-MS /MS)测定人血浆中氯吡格雷的方法,并以氯吡格雷-d4为内标(IS)进行了验证。分析物和IS通过固相萃取从500µl等分的人血浆中提取。氯吡格雷和IS的前体产物离子跃迁分别为m/z 322.2→212.0和326.2→216.0。方法的灵敏度、准确度和精密度、线性度、回收率、基质效应、稀释完整性和稳定性均得到了充分验证。线性范围为20.4 ~ 10,772.6 pg/mL,平均相关系数(r)≥0.9977。根据EMA建议,在方法验证期间也评估了反向转换。结果表明,该方法测定氯吡格雷准确可靠,无氯吡格雷酸反转化现象。该方法成功应用于32名健康男性志愿者在禁食条件下对75 mg硫酸氯吡格雷片剂配方进行生物等效性研究。药代动力学参数Cmax、AUC0 - t和AUC0 -α的最小二乘均值比值(置信区间为90%)分别为107.98%(94.52 ~ 123.35%)、100.25%(91.28 ~ 110.09%)和100.49%(91.37 ~ 110.51%)。
{"title":"Regulatory recommendations for clopidogrel: Focus on validation of a reliable bioanalytical method and its application to a bioequivalence study","authors":"S. Dey, Kirti Kandhwal, Shabana Nazarudheen, Onkar Singh, S. Mukherjee, Sanjeev Mishra, S. Reyar, A. Khuroo, T. Monif","doi":"10.3109/10601333.2011.619540","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3109/10601333.2011.619540","url":null,"abstract":"A rapid, simple, and sensitive liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometric (LC–MS/MS) method for the determination of clopidogrel in human plasma was developed and validated using clopidogrel-d4 as the internal standard (IS). The analyte and the IS were extracted from 500 µl aliquots of human plasma via solid phase extraction. The precursor to product ion transitions monitored for clopidogrel and IS were m/z 322.2 → 212.0 and 326.2 → 216.0, respectively. The method was fully validated for sensitivity, accuracy and precision, linearity, recovery, matrix effect, dilution integrity, and stability. The Linearity range was 20.4–10,772.6 pg/mL with mean correlation coefficient (r) ≥ 0.9977. The back conversion was also evaluated during method validation as per EMA recommendation. Results proved that clopidogrel was accurately and reliably estimated by the method without any evidence of back conversion of clopidogrel acid. The method was successfully applied to a bioequivalence study of 75 mg clopidogrel bisulfate tablet formulation in 32 healthy male volunteers under fasting conditions. The ratios of least-squares means (with 90% confidence intervals) for the pharmacokinetic parameters Cmax, AUC0–t and AUC0–α were 107.98% (94.52–123.35%), 100.25% (91.28–110.09%), and 100.49% (91.37–110.51%), respectively.","PeriodicalId":10446,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Research and Regulatory Affairs","volume":"41 1","pages":"87 - 95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86250582","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Controlling type I errors for two-stage bioequivalence study designs 控制两阶段生物等效性研究设计的I型错误
Pub Date : 2011-11-30 DOI: 10.3109/10601333.2011.631547
A. Fuglsang
Recent publications have introduced sequential (two-stage) designs for investigation of bioequivalence in cross-over trials and the occurrence of type I errors have been investigated using trial simulations. They have so far focused on Test:Reference ratio of 0.95 and 0.9 and it has been observed that type I errors above 0.05 may occur. In this paper the behavior of two-stage designs for investigations of bioequivalence is being further investigated, and it is concluded that the existing methods do not universally control type I errors to an acceptable level, and they have the disadvantage of not using the observed Test:Reference from stage 1 in the dimensioning of stage 2. It is observed that type I errors and the alpha at the second stage follow an approximately linear relation in the region of type I errors of 0.05. This principle is used to propose a method that uses both the CV and Test:Reference ratio and which targets specifically a type I error level of 0.05. This is done by using simulation after stage 1 to identify an optimal value for the second alpha. An example is given which illustrates how the method may be associated with both an ethical and economical advantage.
最近的出版物介绍了在交叉试验中研究生物等效性的顺序(两阶段)设计,并使用试验模拟研究了I型错误的发生。他们目前关注的是Test:Reference ratio为0.95和0.9,观察到可能会出现大于0.05的I型误差。本文对生物等效性研究的两阶段设计的行为进行了进一步的研究,得出的结论是,现有的方法不能普遍地将I型误差控制在可接受的水平,并且它们的缺点是在第二阶段的尺寸中没有使用第一阶段观察到的Test:Reference。可以看出,在I型误差为0.05的区域内,I型误差与第二阶段的alpha呈近似线性关系。这一原则用于提出一种方法,该方法使用CV和Test:Reference比率,并专门针对第一类误差水平0.05。这是通过在阶段1之后使用模拟来确定第二个alpha的最优值来完成的。给出了一个示例,说明如何将该方法与伦理和经济优势相关联。
{"title":"Controlling type I errors for two-stage bioequivalence study designs","authors":"A. Fuglsang","doi":"10.3109/10601333.2011.631547","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3109/10601333.2011.631547","url":null,"abstract":"Recent publications have introduced sequential (two-stage) designs for investigation of bioequivalence in cross-over trials and the occurrence of type I errors have been investigated using trial simulations. They have so far focused on Test:Reference ratio of 0.95 and 0.9 and it has been observed that type I errors above 0.05 may occur. In this paper the behavior of two-stage designs for investigations of bioequivalence is being further investigated, and it is concluded that the existing methods do not universally control type I errors to an acceptable level, and they have the disadvantage of not using the observed Test:Reference from stage 1 in the dimensioning of stage 2. It is observed that type I errors and the alpha at the second stage follow an approximately linear relation in the region of type I errors of 0.05. This principle is used to propose a method that uses both the CV and Test:Reference ratio and which targets specifically a type I error level of 0.05. This is done by using simulation after stage 1 to identify an optimal value for the second alpha. An example is given which illustrates how the method may be associated with both an ethical and economical advantage.","PeriodicalId":10446,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Research and Regulatory Affairs","volume":"207 1","pages":"100 - 105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76087345","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Use of computerized systems in clinical research: A regulatory perspective 临床研究中计算机化系统的使用:监管视角
Pub Date : 2011-08-25 DOI: 10.3109/10601333.2011.594443
Pratik Thakkar, V. Balamuralidhara, T. Pramod Kumar, Ravi Valluru, M. Venkatesh
Electronic source data and documentation from clinical investigations should be attributable, legible, contemporaneous, original and accurate. 21 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 11 provides acceptance criteria for electronic records, signatures, and handwritten signatures executed to electronic records. All study protocols should identify each step at which a computerized system will be used to create, modify, maintain, archive, retrieve, or transmit source data. Standard operating procedures and controls should be established when using computerized systems to create, modify, maintain, or transmit electronic records, and when collecting source data at clinical trial sites. Access must be limited to authorized individuals. Computer generated, time-stamped electronic audits trails should be undertaken to track changes to electronic source documentation. Controls should be established to ensure that the system’s date and time are correct. Procedures and controls should be put in place to prevent the altering, browsing, querying, or reporting of data via external software applications that do not enter through the protective system software. Prompts, flags, or other help features should be incorporated in a computerized system to encourage consistent use of clinical terminology. Individuals should have training necessary to perform their assigned tasks.
来自临床调查的电子源数据和文件应该是可归因的、易读的、同步的、原始的和准确的。21联邦法规(CFR)第11部分提供了电子记录、签名和对电子记录执行的手写签名的接受标准。所有研究方案应确定计算机化系统将用于创建、修改、维护、存档、检索或传输源数据的每个步骤。当使用计算机系统创建、修改、维护或传输电子记录时,以及在临床试验现场收集源数据时,应建立标准操作程序和控制。只有经过授权的个人才能进入。应进行计算机生成的、带有时间戳的电子审计跟踪,以跟踪电子源文件的更改。应建立控制措施以确保系统的日期和时间是正确的。应制定程序和控制措施,以防止通过未通过保护系统软件进入的外部软件应用程序更改、浏览、查询或报告数据。提示、标志或其他帮助特征应纳入计算机化系统,以鼓励临床术语的一致使用。个人应接受必要的培训,以执行分配给他们的任务。
{"title":"Use of computerized systems in clinical research: A regulatory perspective","authors":"Pratik Thakkar, V. Balamuralidhara, T. Pramod Kumar, Ravi Valluru, M. Venkatesh","doi":"10.3109/10601333.2011.594443","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3109/10601333.2011.594443","url":null,"abstract":"Electronic source data and documentation from clinical investigations should be attributable, legible, contemporaneous, original and accurate. 21 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 11 provides acceptance criteria for electronic records, signatures, and handwritten signatures executed to electronic records. All study protocols should identify each step at which a computerized system will be used to create, modify, maintain, archive, retrieve, or transmit source data. Standard operating procedures and controls should be established when using computerized systems to create, modify, maintain, or transmit electronic records, and when collecting source data at clinical trial sites. Access must be limited to authorized individuals. Computer generated, time-stamped electronic audits trails should be undertaken to track changes to electronic source documentation. Controls should be established to ensure that the system’s date and time are correct. Procedures and controls should be put in place to prevent the altering, browsing, querying, or reporting of data via external software applications that do not enter through the protective system software. Prompts, flags, or other help features should be incorporated in a computerized system to encourage consistent use of clinical terminology. Individuals should have training necessary to perform their assigned tasks.","PeriodicalId":10446,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Research and Regulatory Affairs","volume":"1 1","pages":"55 - 62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82335887","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Pharmacokinetic and bioequivalence study of endogenous compound tretinoin 10 mg capsules in healthy volunteers by base line correction approach 内源性复方维甲酸10mg胶囊在健康志愿者体内的药代动力学和生物等效性研究
Pub Date : 2011-08-25 DOI: 10.3109/10601333.2011.597762
N. Thudi, V. Shrivastav, T. Monif, A. Khuroo, S. Gurule, P. Partani, M. Tandon, R. Mathur
Tretinoin belongs to the class of retinoids indicated in induction of remission in acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL-FAB classification AML-M3). It is an endogenous metabolite of Vitamin A and is normally present in human plasma. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the bioequivalence between the Tretinoin 10 mg capsules of Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited and VESANOID® 10 mg capsules of Roche Pharmaceuticals Inc. It was a 2-way cross-over single dose study in 60 adult Indian male volunteers under fasting conditions. Since tretinoin is endogenously present in the human body, for baseline adjustment four pre-dose samples were collected. Plasma samples were analyzed for tretinoin by using validated liquid chromatographic mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method. This method has separated both isomeric metabolites (i.e. isotretinoin and 9-oxo retinoic acid) from tretinoin to accurately measure the tretinoin concentrations in plasma for this study. The Mean ± SD of pharmacokinetic parameters Tmax, Cmax, and AUC0−t for tretinoin were 2.55 ± 0.84 and 2.40 ± 0.86 h, 34.29 ± 10.45 and 32.77 ± 9.16 ng/ml, 87.28 ± 30.99 and 80.81 ± 24.68 ng.h/ml, respectively, for test and reference. The ratios of least square means and its 90% confidence interval for Cmax, AUC0−t and AUC0–∞ on both baseline corrected and uncorrected data were found to be within 80–125%.
维甲酸属于类维甲酸类,用于诱导急性早幼粒细胞白血病缓解(APL-FAB分类AML-M3)。它是维生素A的内源性代谢物,通常存在于人的血浆中。本研究的目的是评价Ranbaxy实验室有限公司的维甲酸10 mg胶囊和罗氏制药公司的VESANOID®10 mg胶囊的生物等效性。这是一项对60名印度成年男性志愿者在禁食条件下进行的单剂量双向交叉研究。由于维甲酸是内源性存在于人体内,为了调整基线,收集了四个剂量前样品。采用经验证的液相色谱-质谱(LC-MS/MS)方法对血浆样品进行维甲酸分析。本方法从维甲酸中分离出异构体代谢物(即异维甲酸和9-氧维甲酸),为本研究精确测量血浆中维甲酸的浓度。维甲酸的药动学参数Tmax、Cmax和AUC0−t的均值±SD分别为2.55±0.84和2.40±0.86 h, 34.29±10.45和32.77±9.16 ng/ml, 87.28±30.99和80.81±24.68 ng.h/ml,可供检测和参考。在基线校正和未校正数据上,Cmax、AUC0−t和AUC0 -∞的最小二乘平均值的比率及其90%置信区间在80-125%之间。
{"title":"Pharmacokinetic and bioequivalence study of endogenous compound tretinoin 10 mg capsules in healthy volunteers by base line correction approach","authors":"N. Thudi, V. Shrivastav, T. Monif, A. Khuroo, S. Gurule, P. Partani, M. Tandon, R. Mathur","doi":"10.3109/10601333.2011.597762","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3109/10601333.2011.597762","url":null,"abstract":"Tretinoin belongs to the class of retinoids indicated in induction of remission in acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL-FAB classification AML-M3). It is an endogenous metabolite of Vitamin A and is normally present in human plasma. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the bioequivalence between the Tretinoin 10 mg capsules of Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited and VESANOID® 10 mg capsules of Roche Pharmaceuticals Inc. It was a 2-way cross-over single dose study in 60 adult Indian male volunteers under fasting conditions. Since tretinoin is endogenously present in the human body, for baseline adjustment four pre-dose samples were collected. Plasma samples were analyzed for tretinoin by using validated liquid chromatographic mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method. This method has separated both isomeric metabolites (i.e. isotretinoin and 9-oxo retinoic acid) from tretinoin to accurately measure the tretinoin concentrations in plasma for this study. The Mean ± SD of pharmacokinetic parameters Tmax, Cmax, and AUC0−t for tretinoin were 2.55 ± 0.84 and 2.40 ± 0.86 h, 34.29 ± 10.45 and 32.77 ± 9.16 ng/ml, 87.28 ± 30.99 and 80.81 ± 24.68 ng.h/ml, respectively, for test and reference. The ratios of least square means and its 90% confidence interval for Cmax, AUC0−t and AUC0–∞ on both baseline corrected and uncorrected data were found to be within 80–125%.","PeriodicalId":10446,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Research and Regulatory Affairs","volume":"23 9","pages":"68 - 73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91426673","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Regulation of laboratory-developed diagnostic assays: Where we are 实验室开发的诊断分析的监管:我们在哪里
Pub Date : 2011-08-25 DOI: 10.3109/10601333.2011.597761
Navneeta Bansal
Technological advancements have made diagnostic assays very powerful and valuable tools for disease diagnosis. Diagnostic assays are used for a wide range of applications: diagnosis and prognosis of disease, identification of increased risk of developing certain disorders, and monitoring response to therapy. New diagnostic techniques allow us to format personalized medicine with pharmacogenetic assays such as drug metabolism assays to avoid adverse drug effects, companion diagnostics to identify patients who will respond to a specific drug, forensic assays, and histocompatibility assays. The molecular diagnostics market has become a significant segment of the in vitro diagnostics (IVD) industry. Worldwide sales of $2.5–2.8 billion in recent years for molecular diagnostic products to clinical laboratories, plus clinical laboratory testing service revenues of ~ $3.2 billion in the US alone in 2007, make molecular diagnostics a major market. The market for molecular diagnostics is growing rapidly (1). Moreover these diagnostic assays have made detection of many diseases faster and easier, which would otherwise take a long time for detection due to slow growth or difficulty in growing cultures (2). Such assays are often created by a clinical laboratory because commercial assays for the analyte(s) of interest may not be available or the analyte may be rare; the market for such products would be too small to be profitable. Since rapid and accurate analysis of a patient’s condition is an imperative part of clinical management, these laboratory diagnostic assays become the vital part of this process. All laboratories in the US that perform clinical testing on humans—excluding clinical trials and basic science research—are regulated by the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) of 1988, which were extensively revised in 2003 (3, 4). The 2003 final rules require that laboratories do studies for Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved non-waived assays to verify performance specifications established by the manufacturer. The performance characteristics that must be verified include accuracy, precision, reportable range, and reference interval. Nonetheless, laboratory developed diagnostic assays require more extensive studies: accuracy, precision, reportable range, reference interval, analytical sensitivity and specificity, validation, verification of the assays at the time of assay development (5). While most FDA-waived assays are reviewed by CLIA, CLIA regulations stipulate that it is the responsibility of clinical laboratory directors to establish performance characteristics for laboratorydeveloped diagnostic assays used in their laboratories. The fact is, laboratories face many challenges in trying to accomplish this. Although laboratories determine the type of experiments that are required, including the acceptable number and type of specimens, and choose the statistical methods to evaluate the data for the performance of tests, the techn
技术进步使诊断分析成为疾病诊断的有力和有价值的工具。诊断分析的应用范围很广:疾病的诊断和预后,确定发展某些疾病的风险增加,以及监测对治疗的反应。新的诊断技术使我们能够通过药物遗传学分析(如药物代谢分析以避免药物不良反应)、伴随诊断(以确定对特定药物有反应的患者)、法医分析和组织相容性分析来格式化个性化医疗。分子诊断市场已成为体外诊断(IVD)行业的重要组成部分。近年来,分子诊断产品向临床实验室的全球销售额为25 - 28亿美元,加上2007年仅在美国的临床实验室检测服务收入约为32亿美元,使分子诊断成为一个主要市场。分子诊断市场正在迅速增长(1)。此外,这些诊断分析方法使许多疾病的检测更快、更容易,否则由于生长缓慢或培养困难而需要很长时间才能进行检测(2)。这些检测方法通常由临床实验室创建,因为可能无法获得对感兴趣的分析物的商业分析方法或分析物可能很罕见;这类产品的市场太小,无法盈利。由于快速和准确地分析病人的病情是临床管理的一个重要组成部分,这些实验室诊断分析成为这一过程的重要组成部分。美国所有进行人体临床试验的实验室(不包括临床试验和基础科学研究)都受1988年临床实验室改进修正案(CLIA)的监管,该修正案于2003年进行了广泛修订(3,4)。2003年的最终规则要求实验室为美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准的非豁免检测进行研究,以验证制造商建立的性能规范。必须验证的性能特征包括准确性、精密度、可报告范围和参考间隔。然而,实验室开发的诊断分析需要更广泛的研究:准确性,精密度,可报告范围,参考区间,分析灵敏度和特异性,验证,在检测开发时检测的验证(5)。虽然大多数fda豁免的检测由CLIA审查,但CLIA法规规定临床实验室主任有责任为实验室开发的诊断分析建立性能特征。事实是,实验室在尝试实现这一目标时面临许多挑战。虽然实验室确定所需的实验类型,包括可接受的标本数量和类型,并选择统计方法来评估测试性能的数据,但技术正在迅速发展和不断变化,使现有准则难以适用。此外,对于实验室开发的诊断分析,没有一套全面的指南来帮助实验室管理必要的分析研究,以满足法规要求,并确保所有认证组织都能接受的稳健性能。因此,实验室面临着巨大的压力,需要控制成本并为监管意见铺平道路
{"title":"Regulation of laboratory-developed diagnostic assays: Where we are","authors":"Navneeta Bansal","doi":"10.3109/10601333.2011.597761","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3109/10601333.2011.597761","url":null,"abstract":"Technological advancements have made diagnostic assays very powerful and valuable tools for disease diagnosis. Diagnostic assays are used for a wide range of applications: diagnosis and prognosis of disease, identification of increased risk of developing certain disorders, and monitoring response to therapy. New diagnostic techniques allow us to format personalized medicine with pharmacogenetic assays such as drug metabolism assays to avoid adverse drug effects, companion diagnostics to identify patients who will respond to a specific drug, forensic assays, and histocompatibility assays. The molecular diagnostics market has become a significant segment of the in vitro diagnostics (IVD) industry. Worldwide sales of $2.5–2.8 billion in recent years for molecular diagnostic products to clinical laboratories, plus clinical laboratory testing service revenues of ~ $3.2 billion in the US alone in 2007, make molecular diagnostics a major market. The market for molecular diagnostics is growing rapidly (1). Moreover these diagnostic assays have made detection of many diseases faster and easier, which would otherwise take a long time for detection due to slow growth or difficulty in growing cultures (2). Such assays are often created by a clinical laboratory because commercial assays for the analyte(s) of interest may not be available or the analyte may be rare; the market for such products would be too small to be profitable. Since rapid and accurate analysis of a patient’s condition is an imperative part of clinical management, these laboratory diagnostic assays become the vital part of this process. All laboratories in the US that perform clinical testing on humans—excluding clinical trials and basic science research—are regulated by the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) of 1988, which were extensively revised in 2003 (3, 4). The 2003 final rules require that laboratories do studies for Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved non-waived assays to verify performance specifications established by the manufacturer. The performance characteristics that must be verified include accuracy, precision, reportable range, and reference interval. Nonetheless, laboratory developed diagnostic assays require more extensive studies: accuracy, precision, reportable range, reference interval, analytical sensitivity and specificity, validation, verification of the assays at the time of assay development (5). While most FDA-waived assays are reviewed by CLIA, CLIA regulations stipulate that it is the responsibility of clinical laboratory directors to establish performance characteristics for laboratorydeveloped diagnostic assays used in their laboratories. The fact is, laboratories face many challenges in trying to accomplish this. Although laboratories determine the type of experiments that are required, including the acceptable number and type of specimens, and choose the statistical methods to evaluate the data for the performance of tests, the techn","PeriodicalId":10446,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Research and Regulatory Affairs","volume":"73 1","pages":"63 - 67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86150876","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Retrospective analysis of the impact of post-approval drug research on utilization of new medicines in the US 美国批准后药物研究对新药利用影响的回顾性分析
Pub Date : 2011-08-25 DOI: 10.3109/10601333.2011.605368
Jean-Marc C. Haeusler
Post-approval research can provide critical information for clinical practice. However, quantitative evidence of its value is lacking. This study aimed to assess the impact of publications of post-approval studies on drug utilization. This was a retrospective analysis of US sales data of drugs approved in 2002/2003, compared with the timing of publications in Pubmed within 5 years of marketing. The primary outcome, dSAMP, was a surrogate measure for the impact on utilization, defined as the difference between the sums of SAMP (Sales Actuals Minus Predicted by linear regression) in the three quarters up to the publication and the three following quarters. Seven hundred and sixty-four publications of 15 products were included. Average dSAMP was US$ 14M (95% CI 7.3–20.7; p = 0.00005), with an increase in SAMP mainly in the second and third quarter after publication. dSAMP was negative for publications in years 0–2, neutral in years 2–4, and positive thereafter. Methodological rigor, geographic distribution, and positive or negative outcome only had limited impact on dSAMP. In conclusion, this was the first study demonstrating an impact of post-approval research on utilization of medicines. One published study led to a relative increase in average sales of US$ 14M. Further research is necessary to elucidate the link between utilization and societal value.
批准后的研究可以为临床实践提供关键信息。然而,缺乏量化证据来证明其价值。本研究旨在评估批准后研究发表对药物使用的影响。这是对2002/2003年批准的美国药品销售数据的回顾性分析,并与上市后5年内在Pubmed上发表的时间进行比较。主要结果dSAMP是对利用率影响的替代度量,定义为发布前三个季度和随后三个季度的SAMP(实际销售减去线性回归预测)总和之间的差异。共收录15种产品764种出版物。平均dSAMP为1400万美元(95% CI 7.3-20.7;p = 0.00005), SAMP主要在发表后的第二和第三季度上升。dSAMP在0-2年为负,2-4年为中性,此后为正。方法的严谨性、地理分布和阳性或阴性结果对dSAMP的影响有限。总之,这是第一项证明批准后研究对药物利用影响的研究。一项已发表的研究导致平均销售额相对增加了1400万美元。有必要进一步研究以阐明利用与社会价值之间的联系。
{"title":"Retrospective analysis of the impact of post-approval drug research on utilization of new medicines in the US","authors":"Jean-Marc C. Haeusler","doi":"10.3109/10601333.2011.605368","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3109/10601333.2011.605368","url":null,"abstract":"Post-approval research can provide critical information for clinical practice. However, quantitative evidence of its value is lacking. This study aimed to assess the impact of publications of post-approval studies on drug utilization. This was a retrospective analysis of US sales data of drugs approved in 2002/2003, compared with the timing of publications in Pubmed within 5 years of marketing. The primary outcome, dSAMP, was a surrogate measure for the impact on utilization, defined as the difference between the sums of SAMP (Sales Actuals Minus Predicted by linear regression) in the three quarters up to the publication and the three following quarters. Seven hundred and sixty-four publications of 15 products were included. Average dSAMP was US$ 14M (95% CI 7.3–20.7; p = 0.00005), with an increase in SAMP mainly in the second and third quarter after publication. dSAMP was negative for publications in years 0–2, neutral in years 2–4, and positive thereafter. Methodological rigor, geographic distribution, and positive or negative outcome only had limited impact on dSAMP. In conclusion, this was the first study demonstrating an impact of post-approval research on utilization of medicines. One published study led to a relative increase in average sales of US$ 14M. Further research is necessary to elucidate the link between utilization and societal value.","PeriodicalId":10446,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Research and Regulatory Affairs","volume":"25 1","pages":"74 - 80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74979658","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Alzheimer’s disease: Recent advances in diagnosis and overview of clinical research in newer treatments 阿尔茨海默病:诊断的最新进展和新疗法的临床研究综述
Pub Date : 2011-05-23 DOI: 10.3109/10601333.2011.560154
Shiva Naga Vara Prasad Bathula, Vijayshekar Dustakar
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a progressive and fatal neurodegenerative disorder manifested by cognitive and memory deterioration, progressive impairment of activities of daily living, and a variety of neuropsychiatric symptoms and behavioral disturbances. This article discusses worldwide prevalence patterns, history, and summarizes hypotheses about the causes of AD. Currently available diagnostic methods, their effectiveness of, and problems with, different methods and recent advances are thoroughly discussed. Finally, current treatment strategies are discussed in light of the benefits and drawbacks of different therapeutic approaches along with ongoing drugs under development.
阿尔茨海默病(Alzheimer 's disease, AD)是一种进行性、致死性神经退行性疾病,表现为认知和记忆减退、进行性日常生活活动障碍、多种神经精神症状和行为障碍。本文讨论了AD的全球流行模式、历史,并总结了有关AD病因的假设。本文对目前可用的诊断方法、其有效性、存在的问题以及不同方法的最新进展进行了全面的讨论。最后,根据不同治疗方法的优点和缺点以及正在开发的药物,讨论了当前的治疗策略。
{"title":"Alzheimer’s disease: Recent advances in diagnosis and overview of clinical research in newer treatments","authors":"Shiva Naga Vara Prasad Bathula, Vijayshekar Dustakar","doi":"10.3109/10601333.2011.560154","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3109/10601333.2011.560154","url":null,"abstract":"Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a progressive and fatal neurodegenerative disorder manifested by cognitive and memory deterioration, progressive impairment of activities of daily living, and a variety of neuropsychiatric symptoms and behavioral disturbances. This article discusses worldwide prevalence patterns, history, and summarizes hypotheses about the causes of AD. Currently available diagnostic methods, their effectiveness of, and problems with, different methods and recent advances are thoroughly discussed. Finally, current treatment strategies are discussed in light of the benefits and drawbacks of different therapeutic approaches along with ongoing drugs under development.","PeriodicalId":10446,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Research and Regulatory Affairs","volume":"20 1","pages":"34 - 37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87425730","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparative study of anti-inflammatory activity of some branded generic and generic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs 一些品牌仿制药与非甾体类仿制药抗炎活性的比较研究
Pub Date : 2011-05-23 DOI: 10.3109/10601333.2010.551403
Vedavathi Thavva, V. Jayanti, Joseph Weinberg
Generic drugs play a very important role in health care. A study was undertaken to ascertain the equality or inequality between generics and branded generics. NSAIDs are the most commonly used drugs. So these drugs were chosen for the study. Selected branded generic and generic products of ibuprofen, nimesulide, and diclofenac sodium were tested by oral administration of their suspensions to different groups of rats. Freshly prepared drug suspensions equivalent to doses of 40, 10, and 5 mg/kg of ibuprofen, nimesulide, and diclofenac sodium, respectively, were administered orally to the rats and anti-inflammatory activity was measured by the carrageenan-induced rat paw edema model employing Zeitlin’s apparatus to measure the paw thickness. Statistical analysis by t-test, of the activity at the point of maximum difference indicated that with respect to anti-inflammatory activity generic ibuprofen and generic diclofenac sodium are better than branded generic ibuprofen and branded generic diclofenac sodium, respectively, and generic nimesulide is similar to branded generic nimesulide. All the products studied meet the Pharmacopoeial requirements. Hence it may be concluded that branded generic and generic NSAIDs, tested in this study, are of the same efficacy and inter-changeability among branded generics, and switching between branded generics and generics would not result in any difference in efficacy.
仿制药在医疗保健中发挥着非常重要的作用。进行了一项研究,以确定仿制药和品牌仿制药之间的平等或不平等。非甾体抗炎药是最常用的药物。所以我们选择了这些药物进行研究。选择布洛芬、尼美舒利和双氯芬酸钠的品牌仿制药和仿制药,通过对不同组大鼠口服其混悬液进行试验。分别口服40、10、5 mg/kg剂量的布洛芬、尼美舒利、双氯芬酸钠等新鲜制备的药物混悬液,采用角拉胶诱导大鼠足部水肿模型,采用Zeitlin仪测量足部厚度,测定抗炎活性。通过t检验对最大差异点的活性进行统计分析,表明仿制布洛芬和仿制双氯芬酸钠的抗炎活性分别优于品牌仿制布洛芬和仿制双氯芬酸钠,仿制尼美舒利与品牌仿制尼美舒利相似。所研究的产品均符合药典要求。由此可见,本研究检测的非甾体抗炎药品牌仿制药与非甾体抗炎药在品牌仿制药之间具有相同的疗效和互换性,品牌仿制药与仿制药之间的切换不会导致疗效的差异。
{"title":"Comparative study of anti-inflammatory activity of some branded generic and generic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs","authors":"Vedavathi Thavva, V. Jayanti, Joseph Weinberg","doi":"10.3109/10601333.2010.551403","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3109/10601333.2010.551403","url":null,"abstract":"Generic drugs play a very important role in health care. A study was undertaken to ascertain the equality or inequality between generics and branded generics. NSAIDs are the most commonly used drugs. So these drugs were chosen for the study. Selected branded generic and generic products of ibuprofen, nimesulide, and diclofenac sodium were tested by oral administration of their suspensions to different groups of rats. Freshly prepared drug suspensions equivalent to doses of 40, 10, and 5 mg/kg of ibuprofen, nimesulide, and diclofenac sodium, respectively, were administered orally to the rats and anti-inflammatory activity was measured by the carrageenan-induced rat paw edema model employing Zeitlin’s apparatus to measure the paw thickness. Statistical analysis by t-test, of the activity at the point of maximum difference indicated that with respect to anti-inflammatory activity generic ibuprofen and generic diclofenac sodium are better than branded generic ibuprofen and branded generic diclofenac sodium, respectively, and generic nimesulide is similar to branded generic nimesulide. All the products studied meet the Pharmacopoeial requirements. Hence it may be concluded that branded generic and generic NSAIDs, tested in this study, are of the same efficacy and inter-changeability among branded generics, and switching between branded generics and generics would not result in any difference in efficacy.","PeriodicalId":10446,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Research and Regulatory Affairs","volume":"8 1","pages":"27 - 33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74480813","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A pharmacokinetic drug interaction study of ceftazidime with clavulanic acid in healthy male Indian subjects 头孢他啶与克拉维酸在印度健康男性体内的药动学相互作用研究
Pub Date : 2011-05-23 DOI: 10.3109/10601333.2011.578139
M. Tomar, A. Patni, R. Arora, N. Thudi, V. Shrivastav, S. Iyer, A. Khuroo, Sachin Mehra, T. Monif
Ceftazidime is a third generation cephalosporin with a broad range of activity. Clavulanic acid is a β-lactamase inhibitor. A fixed dose combination, with the wide spectrum of action of ceftazidime and clavulanic acid’s high stability to β-lactamases has been developed by Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited (India). The present study was planned to predict any interaction between ceftazidime and clavulanic acid which could affect the safety and efficacy of the fixed dose combination. The study was an open label, balanced, randomized two-treatment, two-period, two-sequence, crossover, single-dose comparative pharmacokinetic study under fed conditions. A single intravenous injection of the test product containing a fixed dose combination of ceftazidime 2000 mg and potassium clavulanate 200 mg and the reference product containing ceftazidime 2000 mg only, was administered during each period. Serial blood samples were collected until 12 h post-dose in each period. Ceftazidime and clavulanic acid concentration in plasma were determined using two separate LC-MS/MS methods and then pharmacokinetic parameters were evaluated. No significant difference was seen in the mean Tmax, Cmax, AUC0–t, and AUC0–∞ when the drug was administered as ceftazidime alone and in combination with clavulanic acid. The Confidence Intervals for the log transformed parameters Cmax, AUC0–t and AUC0–∞ were within limits of 80–125% of ceftazidime for the test and reference products. The lack of significant difference between the pharmacokinetic parameters for ceftazidime alone and in the presence of clavulanic acid ruled out any significant interaction between ceftazidime and clavulanic acid.
头孢他啶是具有广泛活性的第三代头孢菌素。克拉维酸是一种β-内酰胺酶抑制剂。印度兰伯西实验室有限公司开发了一种固定剂量的复方头孢他啶,具有广谱的作用和克拉维酸对β-内酰胺酶的高稳定性。本研究旨在预测头孢他啶与克拉维酸之间的相互作用,从而影响固定剂量联合用药的安全性和有效性。该研究是一项开放标签、平衡、随机、两治疗、两期、两序列、交叉、单剂量、喂养条件下的比较药代动力学研究。在每个时间段内,单次静脉注射含有固定剂量的头孢他啶2000 mg和克拉维酸钾200 mg的试验产品和只含有头孢他啶2000 mg的参比产品。每次给药后12小时,连续采集血液样本。采用LC-MS/MS两种方法分别测定头孢他啶和克拉维酸血药浓度,并对其药动学参数进行评价。头孢他啶单用与克拉维酸合用时,平均Tmax、Cmax、AUC0 - t、AUC0 -∞均无显著差异。对数变换参数Cmax、AUC0 - t和AUC0 -∞的置信区间在头孢他啶的80-125%范围内。头孢他啶单独使用和克拉维酸存在时的药代动力学参数没有显著差异,排除了头孢他啶和克拉维酸之间有任何显著的相互作用。
{"title":"A pharmacokinetic drug interaction study of ceftazidime with clavulanic acid in healthy male Indian subjects","authors":"M. Tomar, A. Patni, R. Arora, N. Thudi, V. Shrivastav, S. Iyer, A. Khuroo, Sachin Mehra, T. Monif","doi":"10.3109/10601333.2011.578139","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3109/10601333.2011.578139","url":null,"abstract":"Ceftazidime is a third generation cephalosporin with a broad range of activity. Clavulanic acid is a β-lactamase inhibitor. A fixed dose combination, with the wide spectrum of action of ceftazidime and clavulanic acid’s high stability to β-lactamases has been developed by Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited (India). The present study was planned to predict any interaction between ceftazidime and clavulanic acid which could affect the safety and efficacy of the fixed dose combination. The study was an open label, balanced, randomized two-treatment, two-period, two-sequence, crossover, single-dose comparative pharmacokinetic study under fed conditions. A single intravenous injection of the test product containing a fixed dose combination of ceftazidime 2000 mg and potassium clavulanate 200 mg and the reference product containing ceftazidime 2000 mg only, was administered during each period. Serial blood samples were collected until 12 h post-dose in each period. Ceftazidime and clavulanic acid concentration in plasma were determined using two separate LC-MS/MS methods and then pharmacokinetic parameters were evaluated. No significant difference was seen in the mean Tmax, Cmax, AUC0–t, and AUC0–∞ when the drug was administered as ceftazidime alone and in combination with clavulanic acid. The Confidence Intervals for the log transformed parameters Cmax, AUC0–t and AUC0–∞ were within limits of 80–125% of ceftazidime for the test and reference products. The lack of significant difference between the pharmacokinetic parameters for ceftazidime alone and in the presence of clavulanic acid ruled out any significant interaction between ceftazidime and clavulanic acid.","PeriodicalId":10446,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Research and Regulatory Affairs","volume":"22 1","pages":"49 - 53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88308991","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Comparative stability study of unit-dose repackaged furosemide tablets 单位剂量重新包装呋塞米片的稳定性比较研究
Pub Date : 2011-05-23 DOI: 10.3109/10601333.2011.568492
E. B. Asafu-Adjaye, A. Carlin, E. Jefferson, A. Bryant, B. Rothman, M. A. Khan, P. Faustino
The stability of a 40 mg furosemide tablet drug product repackaged in a unit-dose USP class A blister pack and the identical product in its original container made of HDPE material was studied under ICH long-term conditions of 25°C and relative humidity (RH) of 60% and accelerated stressed conditions of 40°C and 75% RH. Samples from original and repackaged drug products were periodically removed from storage conditions and subjected to pharmaceutical and spectroscopic analysis. Results indicate the potency 91.5 ± 0.9% of the tablet strength for the original packaging drug product vs 91.6 ± 4.0% for the repackaged product are statistically similar for long-term and accelerated stress conditions. Tablet hardness (6.0 ± 0.3 KP) and loss on drying (3.2%) was the same for original and repackaged drug products under both stressed conditions indicating similar moisture sorption behavior. Non-invasive spectroscopic techniques did not show any differences in moisture content. Dissolution and TGA results were similar for all study samples. In conclusion, contrary to a previous FDA repackaging study for tablets with hygroscopic excipients, the product quality attributes of furosemide tablets formulated with low sorption excipients were not affected by repackaging, under the specific stress conditions of this study.
研究了用单位剂量USP a类吸塑包装重新包装的40mg呋塞米片剂药品和用HDPE材料原装包装的40mg呋塞米片剂在ICH 25℃、相对湿度(RH) 60%的长期条件和40℃、75% RH的加速应力条件下的稳定性。原包装和再包装药品的样品定期从储存条件下取出,并进行药物和光谱分析。结果表明,在长期和加速应激条件下,原包装药品的效价为片剂强度的91.5±0.9%,而重新包装药品的效价为91.6±4.0%,具有统计学上的相似性。原装和再包装药品在两种压力条件下的片剂硬度(6.0±0.3 KP)和干燥损失(3.2%)相同,表明吸湿行为相似。非侵入性光谱技术没有显示出水分含量的任何差异。所有研究样本的溶出度和TGA结果相似。总之,与之前FDA对吸湿性辅料片的重新包装研究相反,在本研究的特定应激条件下,低吸湿性辅料配制的呋塞米片的产品质量属性不受重新包装的影响。
{"title":"Comparative stability study of unit-dose repackaged furosemide tablets","authors":"E. B. Asafu-Adjaye, A. Carlin, E. Jefferson, A. Bryant, B. Rothman, M. A. Khan, P. Faustino","doi":"10.3109/10601333.2011.568492","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3109/10601333.2011.568492","url":null,"abstract":"The stability of a 40 mg furosemide tablet drug product repackaged in a unit-dose USP class A blister pack and the identical product in its original container made of HDPE material was studied under ICH long-term conditions of 25°C and relative humidity (RH) of 60% and accelerated stressed conditions of 40°C and 75% RH. Samples from original and repackaged drug products were periodically removed from storage conditions and subjected to pharmaceutical and spectroscopic analysis. Results indicate the potency 91.5 ± 0.9% of the tablet strength for the original packaging drug product vs 91.6 ± 4.0% for the repackaged product are statistically similar for long-term and accelerated stress conditions. Tablet hardness (6.0 ± 0.3 KP) and loss on drying (3.2%) was the same for original and repackaged drug products under both stressed conditions indicating similar moisture sorption behavior. Non-invasive spectroscopic techniques did not show any differences in moisture content. Dissolution and TGA results were similar for all study samples. In conclusion, contrary to a previous FDA repackaging study for tablets with hygroscopic excipients, the product quality attributes of furosemide tablets formulated with low sorption excipients were not affected by repackaging, under the specific stress conditions of this study.","PeriodicalId":10446,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Research and Regulatory Affairs","volume":"24 1","pages":"38 - 48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89752940","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
期刊
Clinical Research and Regulatory Affairs
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1