首页 > 最新文献

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews最新文献

英文 中文
Corticosteroids and antiviral treatment for Bell's palsy (idiopathic facial paralysis). 皮质类固醇和抗病毒治疗贝尔麻痹(特发性面瘫)。
IF 8.8 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-02-24 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD015563
Peter Konstantin Kurotschka, Fergus Daly, Ildiko Gagyor, Maria Bauer, Franz E Babl, Virginia Hernandez Santiago, Maria Chiara Bassi, Dhruvashree Somasundara, Simon W Lowe, Frank Sullivan

Objectives: This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: Primary objective To evaluate the benefits and harms of corticosteroids, antiviral agents, and their combination, when given at onset for Bell's palsy. Secondary objective To explore whether equity-related factors, particularly age, influence the benefits or harms of those treatments.

目的:这是Cochrane综述(干预)的一个方案。本研究的目的如下:主要目的评价贝尔麻痹发病时使用皮质类固醇、抗病毒药物及其联合用药的利弊。次要目的探讨与公平相关的因素,特别是年龄,是否会影响这些治疗的利弊。
{"title":"Corticosteroids and antiviral treatment for Bell's palsy (idiopathic facial paralysis).","authors":"Peter Konstantin Kurotschka, Fergus Daly, Ildiko Gagyor, Maria Bauer, Franz E Babl, Virginia Hernandez Santiago, Maria Chiara Bassi, Dhruvashree Somasundara, Simon W Lowe, Frank Sullivan","doi":"10.1002/14651858.CD015563","DOIUrl":"10.1002/14651858.CD015563","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: Primary objective To evaluate the benefits and harms of corticosteroids, antiviral agents, and their combination, when given at onset for Bell's palsy. Secondary objective To explore whether equity-related factors, particularly age, influence the benefits or harms of those treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":10473,"journal":{"name":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","volume":"2 ","pages":"CD015563"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12930351/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147282606","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas. 流行地区服用抗叶酸抗疟疾药物人群的叶酸补充与疟疾易感性和严重程度
IF 8.8 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-02-18 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.pub2
Yan Ping Qi, Krista S Crider, Julie Gutman, Elizabeth Centeno-Tablante, Amy Fothergill, Kelicia Daniels, Lorraine F Yeung, Cara T Mai, Saurabh Mehta, Jennifer L Williams, Julia L Finkelstein
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Malaria is an infectious disease transmitted by female Anopheles mosquitoes, with ongoing transmission in over 80 countries. The malaria parasite requires folate for survival and growth; antifolate antimalarial medications used for prevention and treatment target enzymes in folate metabolism as their mechanism of action. Periconceptional folic acid (synthetic form of folate) supplementation (400 μg/day) is the standard of care for neural tube defect prevention. Concerns have been raised about the potential effects of folic acid (including above the tolerable upper intake level (UL) >1.0 mg/day) in the context of malaria prevention and treatment, including the efficacy of antimalarial medications. Examining the potential impact of folic acid on malaria risk and severity amongst people taking antifolate antimalarial medications may inform public health programmes in malaria-endemic areas.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the effects of folic acid supplementation on the risk and severity of malaria infection amongst people taking antifolate antimalarials and living in areas with malaria endemicity.</p><p><strong>Prevention: </strong>Amongst uninfected people taking antifolate antimalarial medications for malaria prevention, does folic acid supplementation increase susceptibility or severity of malaria infection?</p><p><strong>Treatment: </strong>Amongst people with malaria infection who are being treated with antifolate antimalarial drugs, does folic acid supplementation reduce parasite clearance or increase the risk of treatment failure?</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>We searched databases including CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, and trial registries (September 13, 2024), grey literature, and reference searches to identify additional studies.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>Randomised trials evaluating the effects of folic acid supplementation (alone or in combination with iron or other vitamins and minerals) amongst individuals taking antifolate antimalarial medications in malaria-endemic areas.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>Primary outcomes included uncomplicated malaria or severe malaria, parasite clearance, and treatment failure. Cochrane RoB 2 was used to evaluate the risk of bias. Certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE for primary outcomes. We performed meta-analyses using random-effects models for all outcomes.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>Eight trials with 3486 participants were included: three malaria prevention trials and five malaria treatment trials. Most treatment trials included folic acid doses above the UL (> 1.0 mg/d); one trial included 400 μg per day. Antifolate antimalarials included sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP; five trials), sulfisoxazole plus pyrimethamine (one trial), atovaquone-proguanil (one trial), and proguanil (one trial). Some studies had unclear or high risk of bias due to missing outcome data. Malaria pr
背景:疟疾是一种由雌性按蚊传播的传染病,在80多个国家持续传播。疟疾寄生虫需要叶酸来维持生存和生长;用于预防和治疗的抗叶酸抗疟疾药物的作用机制是靶向叶酸代谢中的酶。围孕期补充叶酸(叶酸的合成形式)(400 μg/天)是神经管缺陷预防的护理标准。人们对叶酸在疟疾预防和治疗方面的潜在影响(包括超过可耐受最高摄入量(UL) bbb1.0 mg/天),包括抗疟疾药物的疗效表示关注。在服用抗叶酸抗疟疾药物的人群中,研究叶酸对疟疾风险和严重程度的潜在影响,可为疟疾流行地区的公共卫生规划提供信息。目的:研究叶酸补充剂对服用抗叶酸类抗疟药物和生活在疟疾流行地区人群中疟疾感染风险和严重程度的影响。预防:在服用抗叶酸抗疟疾药物以预防疟疾的未感染人群中,补充叶酸是否会增加疟疾感染的易感性或严重程度?治疗:在正在接受抗叶酸抗疟疾药物治疗的疟疾感染者中,补充叶酸是否会降低寄生虫清除或增加治疗失败的风险?检索方法:我们检索了CENTRAL、MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、Scopus和试验注册数据库(2024年9月13日)、灰色文献和参考文献等数据库,以确定其他研究。选择标准:随机试验评估在疟疾流行地区服用抗叶酸抗疟疾药物的个体中补充叶酸(单独或与铁或其他维生素和矿物质联合)的效果。数据收集和分析:主要结局包括无并发症疟疾或严重疟疾、寄生虫清除和治疗失败。采用Cochrane RoB 2评价偏倚风险。主要结局采用GRADE评价证据的确定性。我们使用随机效应模型对所有结果进行了荟萃分析。主要结果:纳入8项试验,共3486名受试者:3项疟疾预防试验和5项疟疾治疗试验。大多数治疗试验包括叶酸剂量高于UL (> 1.0 mg/d);一项试验是每天400 μg。抗叶酸抗疟药物包括磺胺多辛-乙胺嘧啶(SP, 5项试验)、磺胺恶唑加乙胺嘧啶(1项试验)、阿托伐醌-原胍(1项试验)和原胍(1项试验)。一些研究由于缺少结果数据而存在不明确或高偏倚风险。疟疾预防比较1:叶酸(单独使用或与其他维生素和矿物质联合使用)+抗叶酸抗疟疾药物与安慰剂/无叶酸+抗叶酸抗疟疾药物。没有报告主要结局,即简单和严重疟疾的数据。一项试验报告了实验室寄生虫病;服用叶酸(含铁)和抗叶酸抗疟药物的孕妇与服用铁和抗叶酸抗疟药物的孕妇相比,疟疾寄生虫病的发生率几乎没有差异(风险比1.21;95% CI 0.56 ~ 2.62;P = 0.63;1项试验,643人)。比较2-4:没有研究报道比较2-4的数据。疟疾治疗比较1:叶酸(单独使用或与其他维生素和矿物质联合使用)+抗叶酸抗疟药物与安慰剂/无叶酸加抗叶酸抗疟药物。与未服用叶酸的人相比,服用叶酸(单独服用或与铁一起服用)和抗叶酸抗疟药物的人(第3天)清除疟疾寄生虫的可能性更低(RR 0.89; 95% CI 0.84至0.95,4项试验,929人,中等确定性证据);并且在第7天(RR 2.12; 95% CI 1.41至3.19,4项试验,1062例个体,中等确定性证据)、第14天(RR 1.97; 95% CI 1.44至2.70,3项试验,891例个体,中等确定性证据)和第28天(RR 1.35; 95% CI 1.21至1.51;4项试验,1012例个体,中等确定性证据)治疗失败的风险增加。比较2:单独服用叶酸+抗叶酸抗疟药物与安慰剂/不服用叶酸+抗叶酸抗疟药物。叶酸antifolate抗疟药可能寄生虫间隙较低(3天)(相对危险度0.87,95%可信区间0.79到0.96,2试验,229个人中确定性的证据),并增加治疗失败(7天:RR 2.58; 95%可信区间0.89到7.45;P = 0.08; 2试验;344人,moderate-certainty证据;14天:RR 4.15; 95%可信区间0.92到18.65;P = 0.06; 1审判;173人,moderate-certainty证据;和28天:RR 1.47; 95%可信区间0.86到2.49;P = 0.16; 2试验;294人(中等确定性证据),与不服用叶酸和抗叶酸抗疟疾药物相比。 比较3:叶酸+铁+抗叶酸抗疟药物与安慰剂/无叶酸+铁+抗叶酸抗疟药物。人们接受与铁和叶酸antifolate抗疟药不太可能清除疟原虫(3天:RR 0.90; 95%可信区间0.83到0.98;P = 0.02; 2试验;700人,moderate-certainty证据),和增加了治疗失败(7天:RR 1.96; 95%可信区间1.05到3.65;P = 0.03; 2试验;718人;14天:RR 1.90; 95%可信区间1.35到2.67;2试验;718人;28天:RR 1.17; 95%可信区间0.79到1.74;2试验;578人;所有中等确定性证据),与铁和抗叶酸抗疟药相比。比较4:无研究报告数据。作者的结论是:疟疾预防:没有一项纳入的试验报告了主要结果。疟疾治疗:接受叶酸补充(单独或与铁一起)和抗叶酸抗疟疾治疗的患者清除疟疾寄生虫血症的可能性较低(第3天),治疗失败的可能性增加(第7、14、28天)。大多数纳入的试验提供的叶酸剂量超过可耐受的UL (bbb1.0 mg)。在一项试验中,叶酸剂量为400 μg/d(预防神经管缺陷的推荐剂量),在寄生虫清除或治疗失败方面几乎没有差异。
{"title":"Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.","authors":"Yan Ping Qi, Krista S Crider, Julie Gutman, Elizabeth Centeno-Tablante, Amy Fothergill, Kelicia Daniels, Lorraine F Yeung, Cara T Mai, Saurabh Mehta, Jennifer L Williams, Julia L Finkelstein","doi":"10.1002/14651858.CD014217.pub2","DOIUrl":"10.1002/14651858.CD014217.pub2","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Malaria is an infectious disease transmitted by female Anopheles mosquitoes, with ongoing transmission in over 80 countries. The malaria parasite requires folate for survival and growth; antifolate antimalarial medications used for prevention and treatment target enzymes in folate metabolism as their mechanism of action. Periconceptional folic acid (synthetic form of folate) supplementation (400 μg/day) is the standard of care for neural tube defect prevention. Concerns have been raised about the potential effects of folic acid (including above the tolerable upper intake level (UL) &gt;1.0 mg/day) in the context of malaria prevention and treatment, including the efficacy of antimalarial medications. Examining the potential impact of folic acid on malaria risk and severity amongst people taking antifolate antimalarial medications may inform public health programmes in malaria-endemic areas.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objectives: &lt;/strong&gt;To examine the effects of folic acid supplementation on the risk and severity of malaria infection amongst people taking antifolate antimalarials and living in areas with malaria endemicity.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Prevention: &lt;/strong&gt;Amongst uninfected people taking antifolate antimalarial medications for malaria prevention, does folic acid supplementation increase susceptibility or severity of malaria infection?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Treatment: &lt;/strong&gt;Amongst people with malaria infection who are being treated with antifolate antimalarial drugs, does folic acid supplementation reduce parasite clearance or increase the risk of treatment failure?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Search methods: &lt;/strong&gt;We searched databases including CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, and trial registries (September 13, 2024), grey literature, and reference searches to identify additional studies.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Selection criteria: &lt;/strong&gt;Randomised trials evaluating the effects of folic acid supplementation (alone or in combination with iron or other vitamins and minerals) amongst individuals taking antifolate antimalarial medications in malaria-endemic areas.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Data collection and analysis: &lt;/strong&gt;Primary outcomes included uncomplicated malaria or severe malaria, parasite clearance, and treatment failure. Cochrane RoB 2 was used to evaluate the risk of bias. Certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE for primary outcomes. We performed meta-analyses using random-effects models for all outcomes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Main results: &lt;/strong&gt;Eight trials with 3486 participants were included: three malaria prevention trials and five malaria treatment trials. Most treatment trials included folic acid doses above the UL (&gt; 1.0 mg/d); one trial included 400 μg per day. Antifolate antimalarials included sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP; five trials), sulfisoxazole plus pyrimethamine (one trial), atovaquone-proguanil (one trial), and proguanil (one trial). Some studies had unclear or high risk of bias due to missing outcome data. Malaria pr","PeriodicalId":10473,"journal":{"name":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","volume":"2 ","pages":"CD014217"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12915520/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146218654","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Screening for osteoporosis with bone densitometry in adults with risk factors for fractures. 有骨折危险因素的成人骨质疏松症的骨密度筛查。
IF 8.8 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-02-18 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD015847
Gisela Oltra, Mariana Andrea Burgos, Diego Ivaldi, Camila Micaela Escobar Liquitay, Juan Va Franco, Luis I Garegnani

Objectives: This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: To evaluate the benefits and harms of screening for osteoporosis with bone mineral density (BMD) measurement for the prevention of osteoporotic fractures in adults with risk factors for fractures, compared with no BMD screening.

目的:这是Cochrane综述(干预)的一个方案。目的如下:与不进行骨密度筛查的成年人相比,评估骨质疏松症筛查与骨密度(BMD)测量在预防有骨折危险因素的骨质疏松性骨折中的利弊。
{"title":"Screening for osteoporosis with bone densitometry in adults with risk factors for fractures.","authors":"Gisela Oltra, Mariana Andrea Burgos, Diego Ivaldi, Camila Micaela Escobar Liquitay, Juan Va Franco, Luis I Garegnani","doi":"10.1002/14651858.CD015847","DOIUrl":"10.1002/14651858.CD015847","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: To evaluate the benefits and harms of screening for osteoporosis with bone mineral density (BMD) measurement for the prevention of osteoporotic fractures in adults with risk factors for fractures, compared with no BMD screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":10473,"journal":{"name":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","volume":"2 ","pages":"CD015847"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12914768/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146218676","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exercise for multidirectional instability of the shoulder. 肩部多向不稳定的锻炼。
IF 8.8 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-02-18 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD015450.pub2
Masaki Karasuyama, Takaki Imai, Masafumi Gotoh, Junichi Kawakami, Takashi Ariie, Shuhei Yamamoto
<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Multidirectional shoulder instability is characterised by symptomatic subluxation or dislocation in at least two directions, often affecting young, active individuals. Although exercise therapy is commonly recommended as a first-line treatment, its benefits and harms remain uncertain.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the benefits and harms of exercise therapy in people with multidirectional instability of the shoulder.</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), PEDro (Physiotherapy Evidence Database), Clinicaltrials.gov and the World Health Organization Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), unrestricted by date or language until May 2025.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>We planned to include randomised controlled trials involving participants with traumatic or nontraumatic multidirectional instability and assessing the effects of exercise therapy compared with placebo, no treatment, waiting list, or usual care.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>The critical outcomes were planned to include overall pain, shoulder disability (measured by validated self-reported scores), participant-rated global assessment of treatment success, health-related quality of life, withdrawals due to adverse events, and the occurrence of adverse events. We planned to extract data at the end of the intervention (primary time point) and at the last follow-up after the end of the intervention.</p><p><strong>Risk of bias: </strong>We planned to independently assess the risk of bias for each study using the RoB 2 tool.</p><p><strong>Synthesis methods: </strong>We planned to synthesise results for each outcome within each comparison using a meta-analysis where possible. We planned to use GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence for each outcome.</p><p><strong>Included studies: </strong>We screened 1899 records after removing duplicates. After title and abstract screening, we excluded 1882 records and assessed 17 full-text articles for eligibility. Of these, we excluded 16 articles for the following reasons: ineligible intervention (n = 13), ineligible study design (n = 2), and ineligible population (n = 1). Therefore, we did not identify any completed randomised controlled trials that met our inclusion criteria. An ongoing study that aims to compare an exercise intervention with a waiting-list control in individuals with multidirectional shoulder instability may provide evidence regarding the benefits and harms of exercise therapy in this population in the future. We contacted the investigators of the ongoing study and received a response indicating that the study had recently commenced; however, no results were yet available.</p><p><strong>Synthesis of results: </strong>We did not find any randomised controlled trials.</p><p><strong>Authors' conclusions: </strong>As there
理由:多方向肩部不稳定的特征是至少两个方向的症状性半脱位或脱位,通常影响年轻、活跃的个体。尽管运动疗法通常被推荐作为一线治疗方法,但其益处和危害仍不确定。目的:评价运动疗法对多向性肩关节不稳定患者的利与弊。检索方法:我们检索了Cochrane中央对照试验注册库、MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL(护理和相关健康文献累积索引)、PEDro(物理治疗证据数据库)、Clinicaltrials.gov和世界卫生组织临床试验注册平台(ICTRP),不受日期或语言限制,直到2025年5月。入选标准:我们计划纳入随机对照试验,涉及创伤性或非创伤性多向不稳定的受试者,并评估运动疗法与安慰剂、无治疗、等候名单或常规治疗的效果。结果:计划的关键结果包括总体疼痛、肩部残疾(通过有效的自我报告分数测量)、参与者评定的治疗成功总体评估、与健康相关的生活质量、因不良事件而退出治疗以及不良事件的发生。我们计划在干预结束时(主要时间点)和干预结束后的最后一次随访时提取数据。偏倚风险:我们计划使用RoB 2工具独立评估每项研究的偏倚风险。综合方法:我们计划在可能的情况下使用荟萃分析对每个比较中的每个结果进行综合。我们计划使用GRADE来评估每个结局证据的确定性。纳入研究:剔除重复项后,我们筛选了1899份记录。经过标题和摘要筛选,我们排除了1882条记录,并评估了17篇全文文章的合格性。其中,我们因以下原因排除了16篇文章:不合格的干预措施(n = 13)、不合格的研究设计(n = 2)和不合格的人群(n = 1)。因此,我们没有发现任何符合纳入标准的完整随机对照试验。一项正在进行的研究旨在比较运动干预与等待名单控制对多向肩部不稳定个体的影响,这可能为未来运动治疗在这一人群中的益处和危害提供证据。我们联系了正在进行的研究的调查人员,并收到了表明该研究最近开始的回复;然而,目前还没有结果。结果综合:我们未发现任何随机对照试验。作者的结论:由于没有发表的随机对照试验评估运动疗法对肩部多向不稳定患者的益处和危害,因此这种治疗的价值目前尚不确定。未来的随机对照试验应将运动疗法与安慰剂、无治疗、等候名单或常规护理对照进行比较,理想情况下对参与者和结果评估进行盲化。资金来源:Cochrane综述没有专门的资金来源。注册:协议(2023)DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD015450/full。
{"title":"Exercise for multidirectional instability of the shoulder.","authors":"Masaki Karasuyama, Takaki Imai, Masafumi Gotoh, Junichi Kawakami, Takashi Ariie, Shuhei Yamamoto","doi":"10.1002/14651858.CD015450.pub2","DOIUrl":"10.1002/14651858.CD015450.pub2","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rationale: &lt;/strong&gt;Multidirectional shoulder instability is characterised by symptomatic subluxation or dislocation in at least two directions, often affecting young, active individuals. Although exercise therapy is commonly recommended as a first-line treatment, its benefits and harms remain uncertain.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objectives: &lt;/strong&gt;To assess the benefits and harms of exercise therapy in people with multidirectional instability of the shoulder.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Search methods: &lt;/strong&gt;We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), PEDro (Physiotherapy Evidence Database), Clinicaltrials.gov and the World Health Organization Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), unrestricted by date or language until May 2025.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Eligibility criteria: &lt;/strong&gt;We planned to include randomised controlled trials involving participants with traumatic or nontraumatic multidirectional instability and assessing the effects of exercise therapy compared with placebo, no treatment, waiting list, or usual care.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Outcomes: &lt;/strong&gt;The critical outcomes were planned to include overall pain, shoulder disability (measured by validated self-reported scores), participant-rated global assessment of treatment success, health-related quality of life, withdrawals due to adverse events, and the occurrence of adverse events. We planned to extract data at the end of the intervention (primary time point) and at the last follow-up after the end of the intervention.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Risk of bias: &lt;/strong&gt;We planned to independently assess the risk of bias for each study using the RoB 2 tool.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Synthesis methods: &lt;/strong&gt;We planned to synthesise results for each outcome within each comparison using a meta-analysis where possible. We planned to use GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence for each outcome.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Included studies: &lt;/strong&gt;We screened 1899 records after removing duplicates. After title and abstract screening, we excluded 1882 records and assessed 17 full-text articles for eligibility. Of these, we excluded 16 articles for the following reasons: ineligible intervention (n = 13), ineligible study design (n = 2), and ineligible population (n = 1). Therefore, we did not identify any completed randomised controlled trials that met our inclusion criteria. An ongoing study that aims to compare an exercise intervention with a waiting-list control in individuals with multidirectional shoulder instability may provide evidence regarding the benefits and harms of exercise therapy in this population in the future. We contacted the investigators of the ongoing study and received a response indicating that the study had recently commenced; however, no results were yet available.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Synthesis of results: &lt;/strong&gt;We did not find any randomised controlled trials.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Authors' conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;As there","PeriodicalId":10473,"journal":{"name":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","volume":"2 ","pages":"CD015450"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12915067/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146218592","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
KRAS G12C inhibitors versus chemotherapy in second line and beyond in adults with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harbouring the KRAS G12C mutation. KRAS G12C抑制剂对携带KRAS G12C突变的晚期或转移性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)成人二线及以上化疗的影响
IF 8.8 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-02-17 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD016054
Anneloes Noordhof, Oke Dimas Asmara, Kim de Jong, Rolof Gp Gijtenbeek, Ymkje Ma Huitema, Femke Hm van Vollenhoven, Ben Jw Venmans, Lizza Hendriks, Wouter H van Geffen

Objectives: This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: To assess the benefits and harms of G12C-inhibitors compared to chemotherapy in second line and beyond in adults with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) G12C mutation.

目的:这是Cochrane综述(干预)的一个方案。研究目的如下:评估G12C抑制剂与二线及二线以上化疗相比,对合并Kirsten大鼠肉瘤(KRAS) G12C突变的晚期/转移性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的成人患者的利与弊。
{"title":"KRAS G12C inhibitors versus chemotherapy in second line and beyond in adults with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harbouring the KRAS G12C mutation.","authors":"Anneloes Noordhof, Oke Dimas Asmara, Kim de Jong, Rolof Gp Gijtenbeek, Ymkje Ma Huitema, Femke Hm van Vollenhoven, Ben Jw Venmans, Lizza Hendriks, Wouter H van Geffen","doi":"10.1002/14651858.CD016054","DOIUrl":"10.1002/14651858.CD016054","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: To assess the benefits and harms of G12C-inhibitors compared to chemotherapy in second line and beyond in adults with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) G12C mutation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10473,"journal":{"name":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","volume":"2 ","pages":"CD016054"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12910670/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146212283","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Respiratory support during endotracheal intubation to improve intubation success in neonates. 气管插管期间的呼吸支持提高新生儿插管成功率。
IF 8.8 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-02-17 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD016332
Poonam Singh, Mayank Priyadarshi, Suman Chaurasia, Michelle Fiander, Jane Cracknell, Sriparna Basu

Objectives: This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: To evaluate the benefits and harms of respiratory support during ETI in improving the rate of successful intubation in preterm and term neonates undergoing intubation in the NICU, delivery room, or emergency room compared to room air.

目的:这是Cochrane综述(干预)的一个方案。目的如下:评价与室内空气相比,在新生儿重症监护室、产房或急诊室进行插管的早产儿和足月新生儿中,ETI期间呼吸支持在提高插管成功率方面的利弊。
{"title":"Respiratory support during endotracheal intubation to improve intubation success in neonates.","authors":"Poonam Singh, Mayank Priyadarshi, Suman Chaurasia, Michelle Fiander, Jane Cracknell, Sriparna Basu","doi":"10.1002/14651858.CD016332","DOIUrl":"10.1002/14651858.CD016332","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: To evaluate the benefits and harms of respiratory support during ETI in improving the rate of successful intubation in preterm and term neonates undergoing intubation in the NICU, delivery room, or emergency room compared to room air.</p>","PeriodicalId":10473,"journal":{"name":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","volume":"2 ","pages":"CD016332"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12910672/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146212294","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Intravenous chemotherapy versus intra-arterial chemotherapy for retinoblastoma. 视网膜母细胞瘤的静脉化疗与动脉化疗。
IF 8.8 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-02-17 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013695.pub2
Alexander C Rokohl, Nikola Lohmann, Niklas Reinking, Nicole Skoetz, Ludwig M Heindl
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC), intravenous chemotherapy (IVC), and the combination of both (IVC + IAC) are among the most important treatment options for retinoblastoma, a rare form of childhood cancer. The outcomes of previous studies evaluating the success rates of these methods have been discrepant due to the varying quality of the research as well as the different study types, sample sizes, and definitions of outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the benefits and harms of IAC, IVC, and the combination of both, in people with retinoblastoma.</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase in September 2025. No search filters or restrictions regarding language or year of publication were used.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies of interventions (NRSIs) comparing either first-line IAC versus IVC or IVC + IAC versus IAC in children and adults with a confirmed diagnosis of retinoblastoma, irrespective of disease severity, gender, or ethnicity.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>We followed standard Cochrane methodology. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using GRADE. Our main outcomes were tumor control with the avoidance of enucleation or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), globe salvage (overall), overall survival, secondary neoplasms, tumor recurrence, development of metastasis, and the number of grade 3 and grade 4 adverse events at the end of short-term (< 1 year), medium-term (< 3 years), and long-term (> 3 years) follow-up.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>We included six studies, of which three compared IAC with IVC (one RCT and two NRSIs) in 210 participants and 214 eyes. The other three studies compared IVC + IAC with IAC (three NRSIs) in 599 participants and 681 eyes. All participants in the included studies were children. The main results presented refer to a medium-term follow-up (up to three years). IAC versus IVC Findings of the RCT IAC compared to IVC probably increases globe salvage (overall) (hazard ratio (HR) 2.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17 to 3.45; IVC: 260 per 1000; IAC: 454 per 1000 (95% CI 297 to 646/1000); 1 RCT, 143 eyes; moderate-certainty evidence). IAC compared to IVC probably results in little to no difference in overall survival (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.20 to 4.80; IVC: 950 per 1000; IAC: 951 per 1000 (95% CI 769 to 989/1000); 1 RCT, 143 eyes; moderate-certainty evidence). IAC compared to IVC may result in little to no difference in tumor recurrence (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.86; IVC: 180 per 1000; IAC: 164 per 1000 (95% CI 81 to 335/1000); 1 RCT, 143 eyes; low-certainty evidence). IAC compared to IVC may result in little to no difference in the number of grade 3 and grade 4 adverse events (1 RCT, 143 eyes; low-certainty evidence). Limitations of the evidence are a high risk of bias and serious imprecision. No other pr
背景:动脉化疗(IAC),静脉化疗(IVC),以及两者联合(IVC + IAC)是视网膜母细胞瘤最重要的治疗选择,这是一种罕见的儿童癌症。由于研究质量的不同,以及研究类型、样本量和结果定义的不同,以往评估这些方法成功率的研究结果存在差异。目的:评估IAC、IVC以及两者联合治疗视网膜母细胞瘤患者的利弊。检索方法:于2025年9月检索了CENTRAL、MEDLINE和Embase。没有使用关于语言或出版年份的搜索过滤器或限制。选择标准:我们纳入了随机对照试验(RCTs)和非随机干预研究(NRSIs),比较一线IAC与IVC或IVC + IAC与IAC在确诊为视网膜母细胞瘤的儿童和成人中,无论疾病严重程度、性别或种族如何。资料收集与分析:采用标准科克伦方法学。我们使用GRADE评估证据的确定性。我们的主要结果是肿瘤控制,避免了去核或外束放射治疗(EBRT),全球挽救(总体),总体生存,继发肿瘤,肿瘤复发,转移的发展,以及短期(< 1年),中期(< 3年)和长期(bbb3年)随访结束时3级和4级不良事件的数量。主要结果:我们纳入了6项研究,其中3项比较了IAC和IVC(1项RCT和2项nrsi),涉及210名参与者和214只眼睛。其他三项研究在599名参与者和681只眼睛中比较了IVC + IAC和IAC(三个nrsi)。纳入研究的所有参与者都是儿童。提出的主要结果涉及中期后续行动(长达三年)。与IVC相比,IAC的RCT结果可能会增加全球救助(总体)(风险比(HR) 2.01, 95%可信区间(CI) 1.17至3.45;IVC: 260 / 1000;IAC: 454 /1000 (95% CI 297至646/1000);随机对照试验1例,143眼;moderate-certainty证据)。与IVC相比,IAC可能导致总生存率几乎没有差异(HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.20至4.80;IVC: 950 /1000; IAC: 951 /1000 (95% CI 769至989/1000);随机对照试验1例,143眼;moderate-certainty证据)。与IVC相比,IAC可能导致肿瘤复发几乎没有差异(RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.45至1.86);IVC: 180 /1000; IAC: 164 /1000 (95% CI 81至335/1000);随机对照试验1例,143眼;确定性的证据)。与IVC相比,IAC可能导致3级和4级不良事件的数量几乎没有差异(1项随机对照试验,143只眼睛;低确定性证据)。证据的局限性是有很高的偏倚风险和严重的不准确性。RCT中未报告其他优先终点。与IVC相比,IAC对避免去核或EBRT的肿瘤控制效果的证据非常不确定(1例NRSI, 23眼;非常低确定性的证据)。继发性肿瘤未见报道。与IVC相比,IAC可能对转移的发展几乎没有影响,但证据非常不确定(1 NRSI, 19名参与者;非常低确定性的证据)。证据的局限性是对严重偏倚和严重不精确风险的评估。结果部分显示了其他结果。IVC + IAC与IAC相比,IVC + IAC在避免去核或EBRT的情况下对肿瘤控制的影响可能很小或没有影响,但证据非常不确定(1 NRSI, 98眼;非常低确定性的证据)。IVC + IAC与IAC相比,可能导致全球救助(总体)几乎没有差异(RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.89至1.03;IAC: 791 /1000; IVC + IAC: 758 /1000 (95% CI 703至814/1000);nrsi 3例,681眼;确定性的证据)。与IAC相比,IVC + IAC可能导致总生存率几乎没有差异(RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.98至1.07;IAC: 925 /1000; IVC + IAC: 944 /1000 (95% CI 904至990/1000);3个nsis, 599人;确定性的证据)。继发性肿瘤未见报道。与IAC相比,IVC + IAC对肿瘤复发(3例nrsi, 681例,极低确定性证据)和转移发生(3例nrsi, 599例,极低确定性证据)的影响证据非常不确定。与IAC相比,IVC + IAC对3级和4级不良事件数量的影响证据非常不确定(2个nrsi, 386名参与者;非常低确定性证据)。证据的局限性是对严重偏倚风险、严重不一致和严重不精确的评估。结果部分显示了其他结果。 作者结论:由于缺乏比较一线IAC与IVC、一线IVC + IAC与IAC的随机研究,大多数纳入的研究不是盲法,设计上是回顾性的,这可能会导致偏倚。IAC与IVC相比,IAC可能增加全球挽救(总体),可能导致总体生存差异很小或没有差异,可能导致肿瘤复发差异很小或没有差异,可能导致3级和4级不良事件数量差异很小或没有差异。IVC + IAC与IAC相比,IVC + IAC可能导致全球救助(总体)几乎没有差异,并且可能导致总生存期几乎没有差异。目前,关于这一主题的研究大多是回顾性的、非随机的,随机研究很少。需要更多的随机研究,更多的研究参与者和可比的长期结果,才能确定IAC与IVC相比,或IVC + IAC与IAC相比,对视网膜母细胞瘤患者的影响。迫切需要制定一种标准化的、国际上有效的终点命名法,以实现更大的同质性和更清晰、可比较的结果。
{"title":"Intravenous chemotherapy versus intra-arterial chemotherapy for retinoblastoma.","authors":"Alexander C Rokohl, Nikola Lohmann, Niklas Reinking, Nicole Skoetz, Ludwig M Heindl","doi":"10.1002/14651858.CD013695.pub2","DOIUrl":"10.1002/14651858.CD013695.pub2","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC), intravenous chemotherapy (IVC), and the combination of both (IVC + IAC) are among the most important treatment options for retinoblastoma, a rare form of childhood cancer. The outcomes of previous studies evaluating the success rates of these methods have been discrepant due to the varying quality of the research as well as the different study types, sample sizes, and definitions of outcomes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objectives: &lt;/strong&gt;To assess the benefits and harms of IAC, IVC, and the combination of both, in people with retinoblastoma.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Search methods: &lt;/strong&gt;We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase in September 2025. No search filters or restrictions regarding language or year of publication were used.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Selection criteria: &lt;/strong&gt;We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies of interventions (NRSIs) comparing either first-line IAC versus IVC or IVC + IAC versus IAC in children and adults with a confirmed diagnosis of retinoblastoma, irrespective of disease severity, gender, or ethnicity.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Data collection and analysis: &lt;/strong&gt;We followed standard Cochrane methodology. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using GRADE. Our main outcomes were tumor control with the avoidance of enucleation or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), globe salvage (overall), overall survival, secondary neoplasms, tumor recurrence, development of metastasis, and the number of grade 3 and grade 4 adverse events at the end of short-term (&lt; 1 year), medium-term (&lt; 3 years), and long-term (&gt; 3 years) follow-up.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Main results: &lt;/strong&gt;We included six studies, of which three compared IAC with IVC (one RCT and two NRSIs) in 210 participants and 214 eyes. The other three studies compared IVC + IAC with IAC (three NRSIs) in 599 participants and 681 eyes. All participants in the included studies were children. The main results presented refer to a medium-term follow-up (up to three years). IAC versus IVC Findings of the RCT IAC compared to IVC probably increases globe salvage (overall) (hazard ratio (HR) 2.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17 to 3.45; IVC: 260 per 1000; IAC: 454 per 1000 (95% CI 297 to 646/1000); 1 RCT, 143 eyes; moderate-certainty evidence). IAC compared to IVC probably results in little to no difference in overall survival (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.20 to 4.80; IVC: 950 per 1000; IAC: 951 per 1000 (95% CI 769 to 989/1000); 1 RCT, 143 eyes; moderate-certainty evidence). IAC compared to IVC may result in little to no difference in tumor recurrence (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.86; IVC: 180 per 1000; IAC: 164 per 1000 (95% CI 81 to 335/1000); 1 RCT, 143 eyes; low-certainty evidence). IAC compared to IVC may result in little to no difference in the number of grade 3 and grade 4 adverse events (1 RCT, 143 eyes; low-certainty evidence). Limitations of the evidence are a high risk of bias and serious imprecision. No other pr","PeriodicalId":10473,"journal":{"name":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","volume":"2 ","pages":"CD013695"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12910674/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146212239","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Preoperative interventions for reducing anxiety in school-age children undergoing surgery: a network meta-analysis. 术前干预减少学龄儿童手术焦虑:网络荟萃分析。
IF 8.8 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-02-17 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD016330
Inês Martins Esteves, Rita Pires, Márcia Pestana-Santos, Filipa Sampaio, Margarida Reis Santos

Objectives: This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: To compare the benefits and harms of pharmacological and non-pharmacological preoperative interventions (alone or in combination) for reducing anxiety in school-age children undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia, and to rank the interventions according to their efficacy and safety.

目的:这是Cochrane综述(干预)的一个方案。目的如下:比较药物和非药物术前干预(单独或联合)对减轻全麻下择期手术的学龄儿童焦虑的益处和危害,并根据其有效性和安全性对干预进行排名。
{"title":"Preoperative interventions for reducing anxiety in school-age children undergoing surgery: a network meta-analysis.","authors":"Inês Martins Esteves, Rita Pires, Márcia Pestana-Santos, Filipa Sampaio, Margarida Reis Santos","doi":"10.1002/14651858.CD016330","DOIUrl":"10.1002/14651858.CD016330","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: To compare the benefits and harms of pharmacological and non-pharmacological preoperative interventions (alone or in combination) for reducing anxiety in school-age children undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia, and to rank the interventions according to their efficacy and safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":10473,"journal":{"name":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","volume":"2 ","pages":"CD016330"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12910671/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146212256","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Risk scoring for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. 心血管疾病一级预防的风险评分。
IF 8.8 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-02-17 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD016333
Adrian V Hernandez, Carlos Diaz-Arocutipa, German Valenzuela, Valery Feigin, Susan Banda, Joshuan J Barboza, Frank Mayta-Tovalino, Manuel André Virú Loza, Stephen Persell, Eileen Wafford, Donald M Lloyd-Jones, Gillian E Mead

Objectives: This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: To assess the effects of evaluating and providing cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk scores in adults without prevalent CVD on cardiovascular outcomes, risk factor levels, preventive medication prescribing, and health behaviours.

目的:这是Cochrane综述(干预)的一个方案。目的如下:评估评估和提供无心血管疾病流行的成人心血管疾病(CVD)风险评分对心血管结局、危险因素水平、预防性药物处方和健康行为的影响。
{"title":"Risk scoring for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.","authors":"Adrian V Hernandez, Carlos Diaz-Arocutipa, German Valenzuela, Valery Feigin, Susan Banda, Joshuan J Barboza, Frank Mayta-Tovalino, Manuel André Virú Loza, Stephen Persell, Eileen Wafford, Donald M Lloyd-Jones, Gillian E Mead","doi":"10.1002/14651858.CD016333","DOIUrl":"10.1002/14651858.CD016333","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: To assess the effects of evaluating and providing cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk scores in adults without prevalent CVD on cardiovascular outcomes, risk factor levels, preventive medication prescribing, and health behaviours.</p>","PeriodicalId":10473,"journal":{"name":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","volume":"2 ","pages":"CD016333"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12910664/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146212281","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Interventions for fatigue management after traumatic brain injury. 创伤性脑损伤后疲劳管理的干预措施。
IF 8.8 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2026-02-17 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006448.pub2
Hugh E Senior, Joan H Leung, Brigette Meehan, Sylvia Leao, Vanessa Jordan, Suzanne Barker-Collo, Sarah Crummey, Suzanne C Purdy
<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Despite the high prevalence and medico-social significance of fatigue in post-traumatic brain injury (post-TBI) populations, there are no validated management strategies to control this condition. It is timely to provide clinicians and patients with the best available evidence of the efficacy of current pharmacological and non-pharmacological fatigue management practices.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the effectiveness of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for fatigue in people who have experienced a TBI.</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>For this review, we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO. We also searched relevant conference proceedings, and we searched ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) for ongoing trials. The most recent searches were conducted on 12 February 2025.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>Eligible study designs were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and randomised cross-over trials (for pharmacological interventions only). Studies with participants of all ages (children and adults) with a TBI (of any severity) were included, where at least 75% of participants had a TBI. Any type of treatment for fatigue was considered. Four categories of interventions were prioritised: pharmacological, cognitive, stimulation/biofeedback, and psychoeducational. These interventions were compared to placebo groups, no treatment, or groups receiving other interventions.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>The critical outcome was fatigue. Important outcomes include fatigue-related outcomes of psychological functioning (depression and anxiety), cognitive functioning (processing speed), general quality of life, and daytime sleepiness.</p><p><strong>Risk of bias: </strong>We assessed risk of bias using the original Cochrane risk of bias tool for RCTs (RoB 1).</p><p><strong>Synthesis methods: </strong>We synthesised the results for each outcome by meta-analysis where possible using mean differences (MDs) and standardised mean differences (SMDs) and a fixed-effect model. Where meta-analysis was not possible due to the nature of the data, we narratively reported the results. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome. We performed all statistical analyses using RevMan and presented results with 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p><p><strong>Included studies: </strong>We included a total of 3518 trial participants (at baseline) across 40 studies, described in 49 publications. The 40 included studies are grouped by type of intervention. There were seven categories of interventions: pharmacological, cognitive, physical activity, stimulation/biofeedback, health visits, psychoeducational, and a final category for trials with multiple interventions (multi-interventions). Four published studies identified in the most recent search are awaiting cla
理论基础:尽管疲劳在创伤后脑损伤(后tbi)人群中具有很高的患病率和医学社会意义,但没有有效的管理策略来控制这种情况。为临床医生和患者提供当前药物和非药物疲劳管理实践有效性的最佳证据是及时的。目的:评估药物和非药物干预对创伤性脑损伤患者疲劳的有效性。检索方法:在本综述中,我们检索了Cochrane中央对照试验注册库(Central)、MEDLINE、Embase和PsycINFO。我们还检索了相关的会议记录,并检索了ClinicalTrials.gov和WHO国际临床试验注册平台(ICTRP)中正在进行的试验。最近一次搜查是在2025年2月12日进行的。入选标准:符合条件的研究设计为随机对照试验(rct)和随机交叉试验(仅用于药物干预)。研究包括所有年龄(儿童和成人)的TBI(任何严重程度)参与者,其中至少75%的参与者患有TBI。考虑了任何类型的疲劳治疗。四类干预措施被优先考虑:药理学、认知、刺激/生物反馈和心理教育。将这些干预措施与安慰剂组、未治疗组或接受其他干预措施的组进行比较。结果:关键结果为疲劳。重要的结果包括疲劳相关的心理功能(抑郁和焦虑)、认知功能(处理速度)、一般生活质量和白天嗜睡。偏倚风险:我们使用原始的Cochrane rct偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险(RoB 1)。综合方法:我们通过meta分析,尽可能使用平均差异(MDs)、标准化平均差异(SMDs)和固定效应模型,综合了每个结局的结果。由于数据的性质而无法进行meta分析,我们叙述性地报告了结果。我们使用GRADE来评估每个结果证据的确定性。我们使用RevMan进行所有统计分析,并以95%置信区间(CI)给出结果。纳入的研究:我们纳入了40项研究的3518名试验参与者(基线),在49篇出版物中进行了描述。纳入的40项研究按干预类型分组。干预措施有七类:药理学、认知、身体活动、刺激/生物反馈、健康访问、心理教育,最后一类是多重干预试验(multi-interventions)。在最近的搜索中发现的四项已发表的研究正在等待分类。药物干预(褪黑激素;重组人生长激素(rhGH);精神兴奋药;阿托伐他汀;单胺能稳定剂(-)- osu6162)可能会略微减轻疲劳(SMD -0.25, 95% CI -0.44至-0.06;8项研究,395名参与者;中等确定性证据)。认知干预(认知康复;技术增强训练;功能技能训练)可能会轻微减轻疲劳(MD -0.32, 95% CI -0.59至-0.06;6项研究,222名参与者;低确定性证据)。刺激/生物反馈干预(光疗、电/磁刺激、指压)可能会轻微减轻疲劳,但证据非常不确定(SMD -0.23, 95% CI -0.47至0.01;8项研究,295名参与者;非常低确定性证据)。心理教育干预(认知行为疗法、接受和承诺疗法、个性化职业疗法、新疗法)可能减轻疲劳,但证据非常不确定(SMD -0.55, 95% CI -0.74至-0.35;8项研究,474名参与者;非常低确定性证据)。在心理功能(抑郁)、心理功能(焦虑)、认知功能(处理速度)或白天嗜睡方面可能几乎没有差别。然而,这些结果是非常不确定的。作者的结论是:关于创伤性脑损伤后疲劳治疗的随机对照试验证据非常有限,且可信度从中等到非常低。尽管脑外伤后的疲劳普遍存在,但我们缺乏高质量的研究来评估干预措施以改善这种致残但可能可治疗的症状。需要进行大量的进一步工作来确定治疗脑外伤患者疲劳的有效方法。资金来源:Cochrane综述没有专门的资金来源。注册:协议可通过DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006448。
{"title":"Interventions for fatigue management after traumatic brain injury.","authors":"Hugh E Senior, Joan H Leung, Brigette Meehan, Sylvia Leao, Vanessa Jordan, Suzanne Barker-Collo, Sarah Crummey, Suzanne C Purdy","doi":"10.1002/14651858.CD006448.pub2","DOIUrl":"10.1002/14651858.CD006448.pub2","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rationale: &lt;/strong&gt;Despite the high prevalence and medico-social significance of fatigue in post-traumatic brain injury (post-TBI) populations, there are no validated management strategies to control this condition. It is timely to provide clinicians and patients with the best available evidence of the efficacy of current pharmacological and non-pharmacological fatigue management practices.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objectives: &lt;/strong&gt;To assess the effectiveness of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for fatigue in people who have experienced a TBI.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Search methods: &lt;/strong&gt;For this review, we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO. We also searched relevant conference proceedings, and we searched ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) for ongoing trials. The most recent searches were conducted on 12 February 2025.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Eligibility criteria: &lt;/strong&gt;Eligible study designs were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and randomised cross-over trials (for pharmacological interventions only). Studies with participants of all ages (children and adults) with a TBI (of any severity) were included, where at least 75% of participants had a TBI. Any type of treatment for fatigue was considered. Four categories of interventions were prioritised: pharmacological, cognitive, stimulation/biofeedback, and psychoeducational. These interventions were compared to placebo groups, no treatment, or groups receiving other interventions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Outcomes: &lt;/strong&gt;The critical outcome was fatigue. Important outcomes include fatigue-related outcomes of psychological functioning (depression and anxiety), cognitive functioning (processing speed), general quality of life, and daytime sleepiness.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Risk of bias: &lt;/strong&gt;We assessed risk of bias using the original Cochrane risk of bias tool for RCTs (RoB 1).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Synthesis methods: &lt;/strong&gt;We synthesised the results for each outcome by meta-analysis where possible using mean differences (MDs) and standardised mean differences (SMDs) and a fixed-effect model. Where meta-analysis was not possible due to the nature of the data, we narratively reported the results. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome. We performed all statistical analyses using RevMan and presented results with 95% confidence intervals (CI).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Included studies: &lt;/strong&gt;We included a total of 3518 trial participants (at baseline) across 40 studies, described in 49 publications. The 40 included studies are grouped by type of intervention. There were seven categories of interventions: pharmacological, cognitive, physical activity, stimulation/biofeedback, health visits, psychoeducational, and a final category for trials with multiple interventions (multi-interventions). Four published studies identified in the most recent search are awaiting cla","PeriodicalId":10473,"journal":{"name":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","volume":"2 ","pages":"CD006448"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12910673/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146212258","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1