首页 > 最新文献

Clinical lung cancer最新文献

英文 中文
Cumulative Incidence and Type-Specific Risk Factors of Pneumonitis After Definitive Chemoradiotherapy With or Without Immunotherapy in Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer 局部晚期非小细胞肺癌放化疗加或不加免疫治疗后肺炎的累积发病率和类型特异性危险因素
IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2025.11.020
Jiawen Sun , Xin Dong , Zhixue Fu , Sen Han , Yuliang Liu , Anhui Shi , Huiming Yu , Yuting Zhao , Wei Deng , Leilei Jiang , Dan Yang , Xiao Chang , Liuhua Long , Jiayi Yu , Yue Teng , Rong Yu , Weihu Wang

Objectives

This study assessed the impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) addition and timing on the incidence of treatment-related pneumonitis (TRP) and explored type-specific risk factors in unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) patients receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 449 LA-NSCLC patients receiving definitive CRT±ICIs from January 2019 to December 2021. Patients were grouped by CRT alone (n = 236) or CRT+ICIs (n = 213), with the latter stratified by ICIs timing (induction/concurrent/consolidation) relative to radiotherapy. TRP (including radiation pneumonitis [RP] and checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis [CIP]) was graded per CTCAE v5.0 through multidisciplinary review. We applied inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to adjust baseline covariates, Fine-Gray competing-risk model to estimate cumulative incidence and risk factors.

Results

Grade ≥ 2 TRP incidence was significantly increased with CRT+ICIs than CRT (30.6% vs. 9.8%; IPTW-adjusted P < .001), highest with concurrent ICIs (51.5%), followed by induction (32.0%) and consolidation (24.2%). Grade ≥ 2 RP increased to 16.7% with ICIs (IPTW-adjusted P = .004), peaking in the concurrent subgroup (39.1%), while comparable between induction and consolidation (16.1% vs. 12.2%). Independent predictors of grade ≥ 2 RP included ICIs treatment, gemcitabine-based induction chemotherapy, and higher lung dosimetry, with cut-offs of lung V20 (volume receiving ≥ 20 Gy) = 26.8% and mean lung dose (MLD) = 14.05 Gy. Grade ≥ 2 CIP incidence (14.2%) was associated with pre-existing interstitial lung disease or emphysema, PD-1 inhibitors and elevated MLD.

Conclusions

ICIs addition and timing significantly affected TRP risk. Mitigating lung toxicity requires careful selection of ICIs strategy, chemotherapy agents, and optimizing lung radiation dosimetry.
目的本研究评估免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)的添加和时间对治疗相关性肺炎(TRP)发病率的影响,并探讨不可切除的局部晚期非小细胞肺癌(LA-NSCLC)患者接受终期放化疗(CRT)的类型特异性危险因素。方法回顾性分析2019年1月至2021年12月接受明确CRT±ICIs的449例LA-NSCLC患者。患者按单独CRT (n = 236)或CRT+ICIs (n = 213)分组,后者按ICIs时间(诱导/同步/巩固)相对于放疗进行分层。TRP(包括放射性肺炎[RP]和检查点抑制剂肺炎[CIP])通过多学科评价按CTCAE v5.0分级。我们应用治疗加权逆概率(IPTW)来调整基线协变量,使用细灰色竞争风险模型来估计累积发病率和危险因素。结果CRT+ICIs组≥2级TRP发生率明显高于CRT组(30.6% vs. 9.8%; iptw校正P <; 0.001),并发ICIs组发生率最高(51.5%),其次为诱导(32.0%)和巩固(24.2%)。≥2级RP在ICIs组增加到16.7% (iptwr校正P = 0.004),并发亚组达到峰值(39.1%),而诱导和巩固之间具有可比性(16.1% vs. 12.2%)。≥2级RP的独立预测因子包括ICIs治疗、基于吉西他滨的诱导化疗和更高的肺剂量,肺V20(体积接受≥20 Gy)的临界值= 26.8%,平均肺剂量(MLD) = 14.05 Gy。≥2级CIP发生率(14.2%)与先前存在的间质性肺疾病或肺气肿、PD-1抑制剂和MLD升高相关。结论si的添加量和时间对TRP风险有显著影响。减轻肺毒性需要仔细选择ICIs策略、化疗药物和优化肺辐射剂量测定。
{"title":"Cumulative Incidence and Type-Specific Risk Factors of Pneumonitis After Definitive Chemoradiotherapy With or Without Immunotherapy in Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer","authors":"Jiawen Sun ,&nbsp;Xin Dong ,&nbsp;Zhixue Fu ,&nbsp;Sen Han ,&nbsp;Yuliang Liu ,&nbsp;Anhui Shi ,&nbsp;Huiming Yu ,&nbsp;Yuting Zhao ,&nbsp;Wei Deng ,&nbsp;Leilei Jiang ,&nbsp;Dan Yang ,&nbsp;Xiao Chang ,&nbsp;Liuhua Long ,&nbsp;Jiayi Yu ,&nbsp;Yue Teng ,&nbsp;Rong Yu ,&nbsp;Weihu Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.cllc.2025.11.020","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cllc.2025.11.020","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study assessed the impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) addition and timing on the incidence of treatment-related pneumonitis (TRP) and explored type-specific risk factors in unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) patients receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively analyzed 449 LA-NSCLC patients receiving definitive CRT±ICIs from January 2019 to December 2021. Patients were grouped by CRT alone (<em>n</em> = 236) or CRT+ICIs (<em>n</em> = 213), with the latter stratified by ICIs timing (induction/concurrent/consolidation) relative to radiotherapy. TRP (including radiation pneumonitis [RP] and checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis [CIP]) was graded per CTCAE v5.0 through multidisciplinary review. We applied inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to adjust baseline covariates, Fine-Gray competing-risk model to estimate cumulative incidence and risk factors.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Grade ≥ 2 TRP incidence was significantly increased with CRT+ICIs than CRT (30.6% vs. 9.8%; IPTW-adjusted <em>P</em> &lt; .001), highest with concurrent ICIs (51.5%), followed by induction (32.0%) and consolidation (24.2%). Grade ≥ 2 RP increased to 16.7% with ICIs (IPTW-adjusted <em>P</em> = .004), peaking in the concurrent subgroup (39.1%), while comparable between induction and consolidation (16.1% vs. 12.2%). Independent predictors of grade ≥ 2 RP included ICIs treatment, gemcitabine-based induction chemotherapy, and higher lung dosimetry, with cut-offs of lung V20 (volume receiving ≥ 20 Gy) = 26.8% and mean lung dose (MLD) = 14.05 Gy. Grade ≥ 2 CIP incidence (14.2%) was associated with pre-existing interstitial lung disease or emphysema, PD-1 inhibitors and elevated MLD.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>ICIs addition and timing significantly affected TRP risk. Mitigating lung toxicity requires careful selection of ICIs strategy, chemotherapy agents, and optimizing lung radiation dosimetry.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10490,"journal":{"name":"Clinical lung cancer","volume":"27 2","pages":"Pages 14-24"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145924420","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Incidence of Pneumonitis in Asian Patients With Lung Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis 亚洲肺癌患者肺炎发病率:系统文献综述和荟萃分析
IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-04 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2025.11.019
Yuting Kuang , Ke Zu , Dezhi Xing , Aixue Liu , Jennifer Uyei , Arianna Nevo , Hsiu-Ching Chang , Christine M. Pierce
Pneumonitis is a notable toxicity of lung cancer therapies, particularly radiation and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Racial and ethnic disparities in pneumonitis risk exist, yet heterogeneity remains understudied. This study aimed to quantify pneumonitis incidence among East and Southeast Asian patients treated for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC). A systematic literature review (SLR) and single-arm meta-analysis were conducted following Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and 5 local language databases were searched for studies published from January 1, 2014 to August 2, 2023. Included were clinical trials in Asian patients undergoing pharmacological or radiation therapy for NSCLC or SCLC. The SLR included 218 trials (NSCLC: 202, SCLC: 16). Pooled incidence of all-grade, grade 1 to 2, and grade 3 to 5 pneumonitis in NSCLC was 5.42% (95% CI, 4.25-6.89), 3.58% (95% CI, 2.54-5.03) and 1.34% (95% CI, 1.06-1.70), respectively. For SCLC, pooled incidence was 12.21% (95% CI, 4.77-27.85), 7.64% (95% CI, 2.48-21.23), and 2.43% (95% CI, 1.47-3.97), respectively. Significantly higher rates of pneumonitis were observed in patients receiving chemoradiation or radiation-containing treatments, in general, compared to those not treated with radiation; grade 3 to 5 events in SCLC were not significantly different. This study establishes baseline pneumonitis risk in East and Southeast Asian patients treated for NSCLC and SCLC, highlighting higher incidence in those receiving radiation-containing treatments, particularly for lower-grade events. The results help contextualize safety data from clinical trials enrolling Asian patients.
肺炎是肺癌治疗的显著毒性,特别是放射和免疫检查点抑制剂。肺炎风险存在种族和民族差异,但异质性仍未得到充分研究。本研究旨在量化东亚和东南亚非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)和小细胞肺癌(SCLC)患者的肺炎发病率。系统文献回顾(SLR)和单臂荟萃分析遵循Cochrane和PRISMA指南。检索MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials和5个本地语言数据库,检索2014年1月1日至2023年8月2日发表的研究。其中包括在接受NSCLC或SCLC药物或放射治疗的亚洲患者的临床试验。SLR包括218项试验(NSCLC: 202项,SCLC: 16项)。NSCLC中所有级别、1 - 2级和3 -5级肺炎的合并发病率分别为5.42% (95% CI, 4.25-6.89)、3.58% (95% CI, 2.54-5.03)和1.34% (95% CI, 1.06-1.70)。SCLC的总发病率分别为12.21% (95% CI, 4.77-27.85)、7.64% (95% CI, 2.48-21.23)和2.43% (95% CI, 1.47-3.97)。总的来说,接受放化疗或含辐射治疗的患者的肺炎发病率明显高于未接受放化疗的患者;SCLC的3 ~ 5级事件无显著性差异。该研究确定了东亚和东南亚接受非小细胞肺癌和小细胞肺癌治疗的患者的基线肺炎风险,强调了接受含辐射治疗的患者的发病率更高,特别是对于低级别事件。该结果有助于将亚洲患者参与的临床试验的安全性数据纳入背景。
{"title":"Incidence of Pneumonitis in Asian Patients With Lung Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis","authors":"Yuting Kuang ,&nbsp;Ke Zu ,&nbsp;Dezhi Xing ,&nbsp;Aixue Liu ,&nbsp;Jennifer Uyei ,&nbsp;Arianna Nevo ,&nbsp;Hsiu-Ching Chang ,&nbsp;Christine M. Pierce","doi":"10.1016/j.cllc.2025.11.019","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cllc.2025.11.019","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pneumonitis is a notable toxicity of lung cancer therapies, particularly radiation and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Racial and ethnic disparities in pneumonitis risk exist, yet heterogeneity remains understudied. This study aimed to quantify pneumonitis incidence among East and Southeast Asian patients treated for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC). A systematic literature review (SLR) and single-arm meta-analysis were conducted following Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and 5 local language databases were searched for studies published from January 1, 2014 to August 2, 2023. Included were clinical trials in Asian patients undergoing pharmacological or radiation therapy for NSCLC or SCLC. The SLR included 218 trials (NSCLC: 202, SCLC: 16). Pooled incidence of all-grade, grade 1 to 2, and grade 3 to 5 pneumonitis in NSCLC was 5.42% (95% CI, 4.25-6.89), 3.58% (95% CI, 2.54-5.03) and 1.34% (95% CI, 1.06-1.70), respectively. For SCLC, pooled incidence was 12.21% (95% CI, 4.77-27.85), 7.64% (95% CI, 2.48-21.23), and 2.43% (95% CI, 1.47-3.97), respectively. Significantly higher rates of pneumonitis were observed in patients receiving chemoradiation or radiation-containing treatments, in general, compared to those not treated with radiation; grade 3 to 5 events in SCLC were not significantly different. This study establishes baseline pneumonitis risk in East and Southeast Asian patients treated for NSCLC and SCLC, highlighting higher incidence in those receiving radiation-containing treatments, particularly for lower-grade events. The results help contextualize safety data from clinical trials enrolling Asian patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10490,"journal":{"name":"Clinical lung cancer","volume":"27 2","pages":"Pages 25-37"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145975196","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Optimizing Tarlatamab Delivery in Small Cell and Neuroendocrine Lung Cancer: Real-World Insights into Step-Up Dosing and Prophylactic Tocilizumab Use 优化小细胞和神经内分泌肺癌的塔拉他单抗递送:对逐步增加剂量和预防性使用托珠单抗的现实世界见解
IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2025.11.018
Utsav Joshi , Faustine Ong , Daniel Melzer , Joanna C. Ma , Andreas Saltos , Alberto Chiappori , Benjamin Creelan , Bruna Pellini , Charles Lu , Eric Haura , Michael Shafique , Tawee Tanvetyanon , Syeda Saba Kareem , Pravash Budhathoki , Daniela C. Bravo Solarte , Syeda Mahrukh Hussnain Naqvi , Omar Castaneda Puglianini , Sameh Gaballa , Jhanelle E. Gray , Sonam Puri

Purpose

Tarlatamab, a DLL3-targeted bispecific T-cell engager, has emerged as a second-line therapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) following progression on platinum-based chemoimmunotherapy. While clinical trials have demonstrated promising efficacy, real-world data on safety remain limited.

Methods

This retrospective study included 40 patients with SCLC or high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma treated with tarlatamab at Moffitt Cancer Center between May 2024 and February 2025. Clinical, laboratory, and treatment-related variables including cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) were reviewed. Predictive models for these toxicities were developed using Firth logistic regression based on data from 30 patients who did not receive prophylactic tocilizumab.

Results

The median age was 66.5 years; 55% were male, and 87.5% had an ECOG performance status of 0 to 1. Among patients who did not receive prophylactic tocilizumab (N = 30), 53.3% developed CRS and 23.3% developed ICANS after Cycle 1 Day 1, with 10% experiencing grade ≥ 3 severity for each. Three patients discontinued treatment due to severe CRS/ICANS, with 2 deaths and 1 transition to hospice. Among those who received prophylactic tocilizumab (N = 10), 1 patient developed grade 2 CRS and none developed ICANS. Elevated LDH and liver metastasis were independent predictors of CRS; LDH was also predictive of grade ≥ 2 CRS. Diabetes and cardiovascular disease were independently associated with ICANS.

Conclusion

Tarlatamab is associated with higher CRS and ICANS rates in real-world settings than observed in trials. Prophylactic tocilizumab may mitigate these toxicities in high-risk patients and should be considered for incorporation into treatment protocols.
目的:tarlatamab是一种dll3靶向双特异性t细胞参与剂,已成为铂基化学免疫治疗进展后广泛期小细胞肺癌(ES-SCLC)的二线治疗药物。虽然临床试验证明了有希望的疗效,但实际安全性数据仍然有限。方法回顾性研究纳入Moffitt癌症中心于2024年5月至2025年2月期间接受塔拉他单抗治疗的40例SCLC或高级神经内分泌癌患者。临床、实验室和治疗相关变量包括细胞因子释放综合征(CRS)和免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征(ICANS)。基于未接受预防性tocilizumab治疗的30例患者的数据,使用Firth logistic回归建立了这些毒性的预测模型。结果患者中位年龄为66.5岁;55%为男性,87.5%的ECOG表现状态为0 ~ 1。在未接受预防性tocilizumab治疗的患者(N = 30)中,53.3%的患者在第1周期第1天发生CRS, 23.3%的患者发生ICANS,其中10%的患者出现≥3级严重程度。3名患者因严重CRS/ICANS而停止治疗,2人死亡,1人转入临终关怀。在接受预防性tocilizumab治疗的患者中(N = 10), 1例发生2级CRS,无一例发生ICANS。LDH升高和肝转移是CRS的独立预测因素;LDH也可预测≥2级CRS。糖尿病和心血管疾病与ICANS独立相关。结论tarlatamab在现实环境中的CRS和ICANS发生率高于试验中观察到的。预防性tocilizumab可减轻高风险患者的这些毒性,应考虑纳入治疗方案。
{"title":"Optimizing Tarlatamab Delivery in Small Cell and Neuroendocrine Lung Cancer: Real-World Insights into Step-Up Dosing and Prophylactic Tocilizumab Use","authors":"Utsav Joshi ,&nbsp;Faustine Ong ,&nbsp;Daniel Melzer ,&nbsp;Joanna C. Ma ,&nbsp;Andreas Saltos ,&nbsp;Alberto Chiappori ,&nbsp;Benjamin Creelan ,&nbsp;Bruna Pellini ,&nbsp;Charles Lu ,&nbsp;Eric Haura ,&nbsp;Michael Shafique ,&nbsp;Tawee Tanvetyanon ,&nbsp;Syeda Saba Kareem ,&nbsp;Pravash Budhathoki ,&nbsp;Daniela C. Bravo Solarte ,&nbsp;Syeda Mahrukh Hussnain Naqvi ,&nbsp;Omar Castaneda Puglianini ,&nbsp;Sameh Gaballa ,&nbsp;Jhanelle E. Gray ,&nbsp;Sonam Puri","doi":"10.1016/j.cllc.2025.11.018","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cllc.2025.11.018","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Tarlatamab, a DLL3-targeted bispecific T-cell engager, has emerged as a second-line therapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) following progression on platinum-based chemoimmunotherapy. While clinical trials have demonstrated promising efficacy, real-world data on safety remain limited.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study included 40 patients with SCLC or high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma treated with tarlatamab at Moffitt Cancer Center between May 2024 and February 2025. Clinical, laboratory, and treatment-related variables including cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) were reviewed. Predictive models for these toxicities were developed using Firth logistic regression based on data from 30 patients who did not receive prophylactic tocilizumab.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The median age was 66.5 years; 55% were male, and 87.5% had an ECOG performance status of 0 to 1. Among patients who did not receive prophylactic tocilizumab (N = 30), 53.3% developed CRS and 23.3% developed ICANS after Cycle 1 Day 1, with 10% experiencing grade ≥ 3 severity for each. Three patients discontinued treatment due to severe CRS/ICANS, with 2 deaths and 1 transition to hospice. Among those who received prophylactic tocilizumab (N = 10), 1 patient developed grade 2 CRS and none developed ICANS. Elevated LDH and liver metastasis were independent predictors of CRS; LDH was also predictive of grade ≥ 2 CRS. Diabetes and cardiovascular disease were independently associated with ICANS.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Tarlatamab is associated with higher CRS and ICANS rates in real-world settings than observed in trials. Prophylactic tocilizumab may mitigate these toxicities in high-risk patients and should be considered for incorporation into treatment protocols.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10490,"journal":{"name":"Clinical lung cancer","volume":"27 2","pages":"Pages 48-58"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145975194","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Efficacy and Safety of Firmonertinib Plus Anlotinib as First-Line Treatment for Advanced NSCLC With EGFR Mutations: A Single-Arm, Phase I/II Trial. Firmonertinib + Anlotinib作为EGFR突变晚期NSCLC一线治疗的有效性和安全性:一项单组I/II期试验
IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2025.11.010
Huiyang Shi, Haohua Zhu, Le Tang, Jingyu Lu, Kai Zhu, Miaohan Wang, Xingsheng Hu, Yuankai Shi

Background: This single-arm, phase I/II trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of firmonertinib plus anlotinib as first-line treatment for patients with non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations.

Methods: We enrolled patients aged 18 years or older and had locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC harboring EGFR sensitive mutation. Patients were treated with oral firmonertinib 80 mg once daily combined with oral anlotinib (days 1-14 in 21-day cycle). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR).

Results: Between March, 19th, 2022 and July, 27th, 2023, 36 patients were enrolled. In dose-exploration phase, 2 patients were treated with anlotinib 8 mg, 3 were treated with anlotinib 10 mg and 3 were treated with anlotinib 12 mg combined with firmonertinib 80 mg. In dose-expansion phase, 5 were treated with 10 mg anlotinib and 23 were treated with anlotinib 12 mg combined with firmonertinib 80 mg. The median follow-up time was 19.4 months. ORR was 63.9% and disease control rate (DCR) was 100.0%. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 19.6 months (95% CI 16.9-22.3). Median duration of response (DoR) was 23.0 months (95% CI 12.1-34.0). Concurrent pathogenic TP53 mutation was an independent prognostic factor (HR 2.38, 95% CI 0.90-6.30, P = .07). Diarrhea and hypertension were the most common TRAEs. ≥Grade 3 TRAEs occured in 36.1% patients. 47.2% patients experienced dose reduction and 33.3% patients experienced treatment discontinuation.

Conclusion: Firmonertinib plus anlotinib demonstrated preliminary efficacy and manageable safety as first-line treatment among patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations.

背景:这项单组I/II期临床试验旨在评估firmonertinib联合anlotinib作为表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者一线治疗的有效性和安全性。方法:我们招募了18岁或以上的局部晚期或转移性非小细胞肺癌患者,这些患者携带EGFR敏感突变。患者口服firmonertinib 80mg,每日1次,联合口服anlotinib(第1-14天,21天周期)。主要终点为客观缓解率(ORR)。结果:2022年3月19日至2023年7月27日,共纳入36例患者。在剂量探索阶段,2例患者接受安洛替尼8mg治疗,3例患者接受安洛替尼10mg治疗,3例患者接受安洛替尼12mg联合菲莫替尼80mg治疗。在剂量膨胀期,5人用10mg安洛替尼治疗,23人用12mg安洛替尼联合80mg菲莫替尼治疗。中位随访时间为19.4个月。ORR为63.9%,疾病控制率为100.0%。中位无进展生存期(PFS)为19.6个月(95% CI 16.9-22.3)。中位反应持续时间(DoR)为23.0个月(95% CI 12.1-34.0)。并发致病性TP53突变是独立的预后因素(HR 2.38, 95% CI 0.90-6.30, P = 0.07)。腹泻和高血压是最常见的TRAEs。≥3级trae发生率为36.1%。47.2%的患者减量,33.3%的患者停药。结论:Firmonertinib + anlotinib作为EGFR突变NSCLC患者的一线治疗具有初步疗效和可管理的安全性。
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Firmonertinib Plus Anlotinib as First-Line Treatment for Advanced NSCLC With EGFR Mutations: A Single-Arm, Phase I/II Trial.","authors":"Huiyang Shi, Haohua Zhu, Le Tang, Jingyu Lu, Kai Zhu, Miaohan Wang, Xingsheng Hu, Yuankai Shi","doi":"10.1016/j.cllc.2025.11.010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2025.11.010","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This single-arm, phase I/II trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of firmonertinib plus anlotinib as first-line treatment for patients with non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled patients aged 18 years or older and had locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC harboring EGFR sensitive mutation. Patients were treated with oral firmonertinib 80 mg once daily combined with oral anlotinib (days 1-14 in 21-day cycle). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between March, 19th, 2022 and July, 27th, 2023, 36 patients were enrolled. In dose-exploration phase, 2 patients were treated with anlotinib 8 mg, 3 were treated with anlotinib 10 mg and 3 were treated with anlotinib 12 mg combined with firmonertinib 80 mg. In dose-expansion phase, 5 were treated with 10 mg anlotinib and 23 were treated with anlotinib 12 mg combined with firmonertinib 80 mg. The median follow-up time was 19.4 months. ORR was 63.9% and disease control rate (DCR) was 100.0%. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 19.6 months (95% CI 16.9-22.3). Median duration of response (DoR) was 23.0 months (95% CI 12.1-34.0). Concurrent pathogenic TP53 mutation was an independent prognostic factor (HR 2.38, 95% CI 0.90-6.30, P = .07). Diarrhea and hypertension were the most common TRAEs. ≥Grade 3 TRAEs occured in 36.1% patients. 47.2% patients experienced dose reduction and 33.3% patients experienced treatment discontinuation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Firmonertinib plus anlotinib demonstrated preliminary efficacy and manageable safety as first-line treatment among patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations.</p>","PeriodicalId":10490,"journal":{"name":"Clinical lung cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145917201","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A United States-Based Real-World Study on Biomarker Testing and Rebiopsy Rates Among Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Across Lines of Therapy 一项基于美国的非小细胞肺癌患者跨治疗线生物标志物检测和再活检率的真实世界研究。
IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-22 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2025.11.017
Charu Aggarwal , Sophia Ng , Rajesh Kamalakar , Sue Beruti , Archana Simmons , Mary Beth Beasley

Background

Comprehensive biomarker testing for patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (a/mNSCLC) is essential for treatment decision-making. However, there is limited understanding of testing adoption across lines of therapy (LoT).

Materials and Methods

This retrospective real-world study used the ConcertAI Patient360™ NSCLC database in the US to assess biomarker testing patterns among adults with nonsquamous a/mNSCLC (2017-2022) who received ≥ 1 LoT with ≥ 90-day follow-up. Testing and rebiopsy rates for actionable biomarkers were analyzed by LoT (1L, 2L, 3L), test modality, and sample type.

Results

Of 4528 patients, 51% were female, 76% were White; the mean (SD) age at diagnosis was 67.2 (10.2) years. Testing rates for ≥ 1 biomarker were 85% (1L), 31% (2L), and 26% (3L). 1L IHC and 1L NGS testing rates were 52% and 57%, respectively (2017-2022). Tissue was tested most often in 1L; liquid biopsy was prioritized in 2L. Among patients who received corresponding LoT and any biomarker test for the prior line, Black patients had lower crude rates of 2L rebiopsy and male patients had significantly lower rates of 2L rebiopsy/testing. Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) for rebiopsy was lower for patients with EGFR WT versus EGFR mutation at 2L (0.40 [0.28-0.59]; P < .001) and 3L (0.46 [0.24-0.89]; P = .020).

Conclusions

While tissue was most frequently used in 1L testing, rebiopsy was less frequent in 2L + . Racial and sex differences in rebiopsy/testing rates were observed. Standardization for 2L + biomarker testing is needed to optimize later-line treatment decisions for patients with a/mNSCLC.
背景:对晚期/转移性非小细胞肺癌(a/mNSCLC)患者进行全面的生物标志物检测对治疗决策至关重要。然而,人们对跨治疗线(LoT)测试采用的理解有限。材料和方法:这项回顾性现实世界研究使用美国ConcertAI Patient360™NSCLC数据库,评估接受≥1 LoT、随访≥90天的成人非鳞状a/mNSCLC(2017-2022)患者的生物标志物检测模式。通过LoT (1L、2L、3L)、检测方式和样品类型分析可操作生物标志物的检测和再活检率。结果:4528例患者中,女性占51%,白人占76%;诊断时的平均(SD)年龄为67.2(10.2)岁。≥1种生物标志物的检出率分别为85% (1L)、31% (2L)和26% (3L)。1L IHC和1L NGS检出率分别为52%和57%(2017-2022年)。1L组组织检测最多;2L优先进行液体活检。在接受相应LoT和任何生物标志物检测的患者中,黑人患者的2L再活检粗率较低,男性患者的2L再活检/检测率显著较低。EGFR WT患者再活检的校正优势比(95% CI)在2L (0.40 [0.28-0.59]; P < 0.001)和3L (0.46 [0.24-0.89]; P = 0.020)较低。结论:虽然组织在1L检测中最常使用,但在2L +中再次活检的频率较低。观察到种族和性别在重新活检/检测率上的差异。需要标准化2L +生物标志物检测,以优化a/mNSCLC患者的后期治疗决策。
{"title":"A United States-Based Real-World Study on Biomarker Testing and Rebiopsy Rates Among Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Across Lines of Therapy","authors":"Charu Aggarwal ,&nbsp;Sophia Ng ,&nbsp;Rajesh Kamalakar ,&nbsp;Sue Beruti ,&nbsp;Archana Simmons ,&nbsp;Mary Beth Beasley","doi":"10.1016/j.cllc.2025.11.017","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cllc.2025.11.017","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Comprehensive biomarker testing for patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (a/mNSCLC) is essential for treatment decision-making. However, there is limited understanding of testing adoption across lines of therapy (LoT).</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>This retrospective real-world study used the ConcertAI Patient360™ NSCLC database in the US to assess biomarker testing patterns among adults with nonsquamous a/mNSCLC (2017-2022) who received ≥ 1 LoT with ≥ 90-day follow-up. Testing and rebiopsy rates for actionable biomarkers were analyzed by LoT (1L, 2L, 3L), test modality, and sample type.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 4528 patients, 51% were female, 76% were White; the mean (SD) age at diagnosis was 67.2 (10.2) years. Testing rates for ≥ 1 biomarker were 85% (1L), 31% (2L), and 26% (3L). 1L IHC and 1L NGS testing rates were 52% and 57%, respectively (2017-2022). Tissue was tested most often in 1L; liquid biopsy was prioritized in 2L. Among patients who received corresponding LoT and any biomarker test for the prior line, Black patients had lower crude rates of 2L rebiopsy and male patients had significantly lower rates of 2L rebiopsy/testing. Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) for rebiopsy was lower for patients with <em>EGFR</em> WT versus <em>EGFR</em> mutation at 2L (0.40 [0.28-0.59]; <em>P</em> &lt; .001) and 3L (0.46 [0.24-0.89]; <em>P</em> = .020).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>While tissue was most frequently used in 1L testing, rebiopsy was less frequent in 2L + . Racial and sex differences in rebiopsy/testing rates were observed. Standardization for 2L + biomarker testing is needed to optimize later-line treatment decisions for patients with a/mNSCLC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10490,"journal":{"name":"Clinical lung cancer","volume":"27 1","pages":"Pages 82-91"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145827054","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Comprehensive Analysis of HER2 status Heterogeneity Using Matched Samples among Potential Beneficiaries of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan Therapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. 使用匹配样本对非小细胞肺癌曲妥珠单抗德鲁西替康治疗潜在受益者的HER2状态异质性进行综合分析
IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2025.11.015
Haiyue Wang, Wei Sun, Chenglong Wang, Xin Yang, Kaiwen Chi, Xinying Liu, Xiaozheng Huang, Lixin Zhou, Dongmei Lin

Background: HER2 overexpression is defined as immunohistochemistry (IHC) 2+/3+, and trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is approved for treating unresectable or metastatic solid tumors with HER2 3+. HER2 spatiotemporal heterogeneity is crucial for identifying patients responsive to T-DXd. While extensively studied in gastric and breast cancers, research in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is limited. We aim to examine HER2 expression and their implications for optimizing specimen selection in potential T-DXd beneficiaries.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively collected NSCLC cases from Peking University Cancer Hospital (2015-2024) with HER2 testing, matched specimens (resection vs. biopsy; primary vs. metastasis), at least 1 lesion with HER2 2+ or 3+. Two pathologists independently re-evaluated enrolled cases using gastric cancer criteria.

Results: A total of 5211 cases underwent HER2 testing, with 2+ expression in 773 (14.8%) and 3+ in 35 (0.7%) cases. Ultimately, 129 patients met inclusion criteria, comprising 88 surgical/biopsy and 102 primary/metastatic samples. Concordance between biopsy and resection was 51.4% (38/74) for HER2 2+ and 21.4% (3/14) for HER2 3+, with significantly higher concordance for 2+ (P = .040). Concordance was 39.4% (28/85) for HER2 2+ and 35.4% (5/14) for HER2 3+ in primary vs metastatic tumors, with no significant difference between lymph node and distant metastases. Both biopsy and metastatic samples underestimated HER2 2+ and 3+ expression.

Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that in potential NSCLC beneficiaries of T-DXd therapy, HER2 expression is underestimated in biopsy samples and metastatic lesions compared to resected and primary sites. This heterogeneity holds great significance for guiding clinical sample selection.

背景:HER2过表达被定义为免疫组织化学(IHC) 2+/3+,曲妥珠单抗德鲁西替康(T-DXd)被批准用于治疗不可切除或转移性实体瘤的HER2 3+。HER2的时空异质性对于确定患者对T-DXd的反应至关重要。虽然在胃癌和乳腺癌中有广泛的研究,但对非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的研究却很有限。我们的目标是研究HER2表达及其对优化T-DXd潜在受益者的标本选择的影响。材料和方法:我们回顾性收集北京大学肿瘤医院(2015-2024)的非小细胞肺癌病例,进行HER2检测,匹配标本(切除与活检,原发与转移),至少1例HER2 2+或3+病变。两名病理学家使用胃癌标准独立地重新评估入组病例。结果:5211例患者接受了HER2检测,2+表达773例(14.8%),3+表达35例(0.7%)。最终,129例患者符合纳入标准,包括88例手术/活检和102例原发性/转移性样本。HER2 +和HER2 +的一致性分别为51.4%(38/74)和21.4%(3/14),其中HER2 +的一致性更高(P = 0.040)。原发性和转移性肿瘤中HER2 +的一致性为39.4% (28/85),HER2 3+的一致性为35.4%(5/14),淋巴结和远处转移之间无显著差异。活检和转移样本都低估了HER2 2+和3+的表达。结论:我们的研究表明,在T-DXd治疗的潜在NSCLC受益人中,与切除和原发部位相比,活检样本和转移灶中的HER2表达被低估。这种异质性对指导临床样本选择具有重要意义。
{"title":"A Comprehensive Analysis of HER2 status Heterogeneity Using Matched Samples among Potential Beneficiaries of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan Therapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.","authors":"Haiyue Wang, Wei Sun, Chenglong Wang, Xin Yang, Kaiwen Chi, Xinying Liu, Xiaozheng Huang, Lixin Zhou, Dongmei Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.cllc.2025.11.015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2025.11.015","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>HER2 overexpression is defined as immunohistochemistry (IHC) 2+/3+, and trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is approved for treating unresectable or metastatic solid tumors with HER2 3+. HER2 spatiotemporal heterogeneity is crucial for identifying patients responsive to T-DXd. While extensively studied in gastric and breast cancers, research in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is limited. We aim to examine HER2 expression and their implications for optimizing specimen selection in potential T-DXd beneficiaries.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively collected NSCLC cases from Peking University Cancer Hospital (2015-2024) with HER2 testing, matched specimens (resection vs. biopsy; primary vs. metastasis), at least 1 lesion with HER2 2+ or 3+. Two pathologists independently re-evaluated enrolled cases using gastric cancer criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5211 cases underwent HER2 testing, with 2+ expression in 773 (14.8%) and 3+ in 35 (0.7%) cases. Ultimately, 129 patients met inclusion criteria, comprising 88 surgical/biopsy and 102 primary/metastatic samples. Concordance between biopsy and resection was 51.4% (38/74) for HER2 2+ and 21.4% (3/14) for HER2 3+, with significantly higher concordance for 2+ (P = .040). Concordance was 39.4% (28/85) for HER2 2+ and 35.4% (5/14) for HER2 3+ in primary vs metastatic tumors, with no significant difference between lymph node and distant metastases. Both biopsy and metastatic samples underestimated HER2 2+ and 3+ expression.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrates that in potential NSCLC beneficiaries of T-DXd therapy, HER2 expression is underestimated in biopsy samples and metastatic lesions compared to resected and primary sites. This heterogeneity holds great significance for guiding clinical sample selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":10490,"journal":{"name":"Clinical lung cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145755430","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of Pulmonary Resection Extent on Nodal Upstaging in Clinical Stage IA1-2 NSCLC: Real-World Evidence of Low Detection Rates with Sublobar Resections. 肺切除程度对临床分期IA1-2期非小细胞肺癌淋巴结分期的影响:肺叶下切除低检出率的真实证据
IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2025.11.014
Yahya Alwatari, Robert A Vierkant, Matthew J Aizpuru, Sahar A Saddoughi, Carlos A Puig, Janani S Reisenauer, K Robert Shen, Stephen D Cassivi, Dennis A Wigle, Luis F Tapias

Objective: Identification of regional lymph node involvement has an impact on prognosis and treatment after surgery for clinical stage IA1-2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study investigates nodal upstaging rates and associated factors, with a focus on sublobar resections.

Methods: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was used to identify NSCLC patients with clinical T1a-b (≤ 2 cm), N0, M0 disease (stage IA1-2) who had sublobar resection or lobectomy from 2004 to 2021. Rates of nodal upstaging (cN0→pN+) were calculated over the study period according to the type of pulmonary resection. Factors associated with nodal upstaging were evaluated with multivariable logistic regression.

Results: The study included 58,626 patients. Nodal upstaging occurred in 6.4% of patients: 3.8% to pN1, 2.7% to pN2. Factors associated with nodal upstaging included male gender, larger tumor size, histology, higher tumor grade, positive resection margins, more regional lymph nodes examined, and type of pulmonary resection. Nodal upstaging rates were 2.9% for wedge resections, 3.7% for segmentectomies, and 8.3% for lobectomies (P < .001). Compared to lobectomy, sublobar resections had lower odds of nodal upstaging: wedge resection (adjusted OR 0.58, 95% CI, 0.51-0.65) and segmentectomy (adjusted OR 0.59, 95% CI, 0.49-0.70; P < .001). This gap in nodal upstaging between sublobar resections and lobectomy persisted over the study period.

Conclusions: The extent of surgical resection and lymph node evaluation were independent factors in detecting patients with regional lymph node involvement, signaling more advanced disease. As sublobar resections establish themselves as a widespread, valid treatment, strategies to close the gap in the detection of nodal disease are needed.

目的:临床分期IA1-2期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的局部淋巴结受累情况对术后预后及治疗有重要影响。本研究调查了淋巴结分期率和相关因素,重点是叶下切除术。方法:采用美国国家癌症数据库(NCDB)对2004年至2021年行叶下切除术或肺叶切除术的临床T1a-b(≤2 cm)、N0、M0病(IA1-2期)非小细胞肺癌患者进行分析。在研究期间,根据肺切除类型计算淋巴结前分期率(cN0→pN+)。用多变量逻辑回归评估与节点占优相关的因素。结果:纳入58,626例患者。6.4%的患者出现淋巴结提前期:3.8%为pN1, 2.7%为pN2。与淋巴结占上风相关的因素包括男性、较大的肿瘤大小、组织学、较高的肿瘤分级、阳性切除边缘、更多的区域淋巴结检查和肺切除类型。楔形切除术的淋巴结分期率为2.9%,节段切除术为3.7%,肺叶切除术为8.3% (P < 0.001)。与肺叶切除术相比,叶下切除术发生淋巴结占优的几率较低:楔形切除术(调整OR 0.58, 95% CI, 0.51-0.65)和节段切除术(调整OR 0.59, 95% CI, 0.49-0.70; P < 0.001)。在整个研究期间,叶下切除术和肺叶切除术之间淋巴结占优的差距持续存在。结论:手术切除的程度和淋巴结的评估是检测区域淋巴结受累患者的独立因素,预示着更晚期的疾病。随着叶下切除术成为一种广泛而有效的治疗方法,需要采取策略来缩小淋巴结疾病检测方面的差距。
{"title":"Impact of Pulmonary Resection Extent on Nodal Upstaging in Clinical Stage IA1-2 NSCLC: Real-World Evidence of Low Detection Rates with Sublobar Resections.","authors":"Yahya Alwatari, Robert A Vierkant, Matthew J Aizpuru, Sahar A Saddoughi, Carlos A Puig, Janani S Reisenauer, K Robert Shen, Stephen D Cassivi, Dennis A Wigle, Luis F Tapias","doi":"10.1016/j.cllc.2025.11.014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2025.11.014","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Identification of regional lymph node involvement has an impact on prognosis and treatment after surgery for clinical stage IA1-2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study investigates nodal upstaging rates and associated factors, with a focus on sublobar resections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was used to identify NSCLC patients with clinical T1a-b (≤ 2 cm), N0, M0 disease (stage IA1-2) who had sublobar resection or lobectomy from 2004 to 2021. Rates of nodal upstaging (cN0→pN+) were calculated over the study period according to the type of pulmonary resection. Factors associated with nodal upstaging were evaluated with multivariable logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 58,626 patients. Nodal upstaging occurred in 6.4% of patients: 3.8% to pN1, 2.7% to pN2. Factors associated with nodal upstaging included male gender, larger tumor size, histology, higher tumor grade, positive resection margins, more regional lymph nodes examined, and type of pulmonary resection. Nodal upstaging rates were 2.9% for wedge resections, 3.7% for segmentectomies, and 8.3% for lobectomies (P < .001). Compared to lobectomy, sublobar resections had lower odds of nodal upstaging: wedge resection (adjusted OR 0.58, 95% CI, 0.51-0.65) and segmentectomy (adjusted OR 0.59, 95% CI, 0.49-0.70; P < .001). This gap in nodal upstaging between sublobar resections and lobectomy persisted over the study period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The extent of surgical resection and lymph node evaluation were independent factors in detecting patients with regional lymph node involvement, signaling more advanced disease. As sublobar resections establish themselves as a widespread, valid treatment, strategies to close the gap in the detection of nodal disease are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":10490,"journal":{"name":"Clinical lung cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145721464","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Diagnostic Accuracy of [18F]FDG PET/CT versus CT for NSCLC Surveillance: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. [18F]FDG PET/CT与CT在非小细胞肺癌监测中的诊断准确性:一项随机临床试验的二次分析
IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2025.11.011
Kasper Foged Guldbrandsen, Martin Bloch, Kristin Skougaard, Elisabeth Albrecht-Beste, Hanne Marie Nellemann, Martin Krakauer, Peter Michael Gørtz, Julie Marie Grüner, Joan Fledelius, Anne Lerberg Nielsen, Paw Christian Holdgaard, Søren Steen Nielsen, Karin Hjorthaug, Lise Barlebo Ahlborn, Erik Jakobsen, Anette Højsgaard, Rene Horsleben Petersen, Lars Borgbjerg Møller, Morten Dahl, Boe Sandahl Sorensen, Malene Støchkel Frank, Jeanette Haar Ehlers, Zaigham Saghir, Mette Pøhl, Svetlana Borissova, Lotte Holm Land, Charlotte Kristiansen, Tine McCulloch, Lise Saksø Mortensen, Malene Søby Christophersen, Ole Hilberg, Thor Lind Rasmussen, Signe Høyer Simonsen Schwaner, Christian B Laursen, Uffe Bodtger, Markus Nowak Lonsdale, Christian Niels Meyer, Oke Gerke, Jann Mortensen, Torben Riis Rasmussen, Barbara Malene Fischer

Background: Following curative treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), surveillance to detect recurrence is recommended. While computed tomography (CT) is the current standard for follow-up imaging, the optimal surveillance strategy remains debated. This study compares the diagnostic accuracy of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ([18F]FDG PET/CT; hereafter referred to as PET/CT) and CT for NSCLC surveillance.

Materials and methods: This study represents a secondary analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial (SUPE_R, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03740126) of patients with stage IA-IIIC NSCLC who completed curative-intent treatment between February 2019 and February 2022. CT and PET/CT scans were compared for recurrence detection using biopsy, multidisciplinary team assessment, or follow-up imaging as reference standards.

Results: The analysis included 899 PET/CT scans and 852 CT scans from 692 patients (mean age 69 years ± 8 [SD]; 412 female). For detecting recurrence, PET/CT demonstrated a higher sensitivity (88% [95% CI, 80%-93%] vs. 62% [95% CI, 50%-73%]; P < .001) but lower specificity (89% [95% CI, 86%-91%] vs. 96% [95% CI, 94%-97%]; P < .001) compared to CT. PET/CT demonstrated a higher sensitivity compared to CT after treatment with chemoradiotherapy (100% [95% CI, 72%-100%] vs. 46% [95% CI, 19%-75%]; P = .006) and at 0 to 6 month after treatment (83% [95% CI, 63%-94%] vs. 41% [95% CI, 21%-65%]; P = .008).

Conclusion: The higher sensitivity of PET/CT, particularly after chemoradiotherapy and early post-treatment, suggests it may be particularly valuable in these high-risk scenarios. However, CT remains preferred for routine surveillance of low-risk patients given its superior specificity.

背景:对非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)进行根治治疗后,建议进行监测以发现复发。虽然计算机断层扫描(CT)是目前随访成像的标准,但最佳监测策略仍存在争议。本研究比较了氟-18氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描([18F]FDG PET/CT,以下简称PET/CT)与CT在NSCLC监测中的诊断准确性。材料和方法:本研究对一项随机对照试验(super_r, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03740126)的数据进行了二次分析,该试验纳入了2019年2月至2022年2月期间完成治愈意图治疗的IA-IIIC期NSCLC患者。采用活检、多学科团队评估或随访成像作为参考标准,比较CT和PET/CT扫描在复发检测方面的效果。结果:分析692例患者(平均年龄69岁±8岁[SD];女性412例)的PET/CT扫描899张,CT扫描852张。对于检测复发,PET/CT表现出更高的敏感性(88% [95% CI, 80%-93%] vs. 62% [95% CI, 50%-73%]; P < .001),但特异性较低(89% [95% CI, 86%-91%] vs. 96% [95% CI, 94%-97%]; P < .001)。与放化疗后的CT相比,PET/CT显示出更高的敏感性(100% [95% CI, 72%-100%] vs. 46% [95% CI, 19%-75%]; P = 0.006)和治疗后0至6个月(83% [95% CI, 63%-94%] vs. 41% [95% CI, 21%-65%]; P = 0.008)。结论:PET/CT具有较高的敏感性,特别是在放化疗后和术后早期,提示其在这些高危病例中可能特别有价值。然而,鉴于其优越的特异性,CT仍然是低危患者常规监测的首选。
{"title":"Diagnostic Accuracy of [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT versus CT for NSCLC Surveillance: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Kasper Foged Guldbrandsen, Martin Bloch, Kristin Skougaard, Elisabeth Albrecht-Beste, Hanne Marie Nellemann, Martin Krakauer, Peter Michael Gørtz, Julie Marie Grüner, Joan Fledelius, Anne Lerberg Nielsen, Paw Christian Holdgaard, Søren Steen Nielsen, Karin Hjorthaug, Lise Barlebo Ahlborn, Erik Jakobsen, Anette Højsgaard, Rene Horsleben Petersen, Lars Borgbjerg Møller, Morten Dahl, Boe Sandahl Sorensen, Malene Støchkel Frank, Jeanette Haar Ehlers, Zaigham Saghir, Mette Pøhl, Svetlana Borissova, Lotte Holm Land, Charlotte Kristiansen, Tine McCulloch, Lise Saksø Mortensen, Malene Søby Christophersen, Ole Hilberg, Thor Lind Rasmussen, Signe Høyer Simonsen Schwaner, Christian B Laursen, Uffe Bodtger, Markus Nowak Lonsdale, Christian Niels Meyer, Oke Gerke, Jann Mortensen, Torben Riis Rasmussen, Barbara Malene Fischer","doi":"10.1016/j.cllc.2025.11.011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2025.11.011","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Following curative treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), surveillance to detect recurrence is recommended. While computed tomography (CT) is the current standard for follow-up imaging, the optimal surveillance strategy remains debated. This study compares the diagnostic accuracy of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ([18F]FDG PET/CT; hereafter referred to as PET/CT) and CT for NSCLC surveillance.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study represents a secondary analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial (SUPE_R, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03740126) of patients with stage IA-IIIC NSCLC who completed curative-intent treatment between February 2019 and February 2022. CT and PET/CT scans were compared for recurrence detection using biopsy, multidisciplinary team assessment, or follow-up imaging as reference standards.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 899 PET/CT scans and 852 CT scans from 692 patients (mean age 69 years ± 8 [SD]; 412 female). For detecting recurrence, PET/CT demonstrated a higher sensitivity (88% [95% CI, 80%-93%] vs. 62% [95% CI, 50%-73%]; P < .001) but lower specificity (89% [95% CI, 86%-91%] vs. 96% [95% CI, 94%-97%]; P < .001) compared to CT. PET/CT demonstrated a higher sensitivity compared to CT after treatment with chemoradiotherapy (100% [95% CI, 72%-100%] vs. 46% [95% CI, 19%-75%]; P = .006) and at 0 to 6 month after treatment (83% [95% CI, 63%-94%] vs. 41% [95% CI, 21%-65%]; P = .008).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The higher sensitivity of PET/CT, particularly after chemoradiotherapy and early post-treatment, suggests it may be particularly valuable in these high-risk scenarios. However, CT remains preferred for routine surveillance of low-risk patients given its superior specificity.</p>","PeriodicalId":10490,"journal":{"name":"Clinical lung cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145741490","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Lazertinib in EGFR-Mutated NSCLC with CNS Metastases: Reinforcing the Role of Third-Generation TKIs through Pooled Analysis 拉泽替尼在egfr突变的伴有中枢神经系统转移的NSCLC中的作用:通过汇总分析强化第三代TKIs的作用
IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2025.11.012
Xinyang Li , Shiwen Song
{"title":"Lazertinib in EGFR-Mutated NSCLC with CNS Metastases: Reinforcing the Role of Third-Generation TKIs through Pooled Analysis","authors":"Xinyang Li ,&nbsp;Shiwen Song","doi":"10.1016/j.cllc.2025.11.012","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cllc.2025.11.012","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10490,"journal":{"name":"Clinical lung cancer","volume":"27 1","pages":"Page 74"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145732956","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Response to the Letter to the Editor: “Lazertinib in EGFR-Mutated NSCLC with CNS Metastases: Reinforcing the Role of Third-Generation TKIs through Pooled Analysis” 致编辑的回复:“Lazertinib在egfr突变的NSCLC伴有中枢神经系统转移:通过汇总分析加强第三代TKIs的作用”。
IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2025.11.013
Byoung Chul Cho , YuKyung Kim
{"title":"Response to the Letter to the Editor: “Lazertinib in EGFR-Mutated NSCLC with CNS Metastases: Reinforcing the Role of Third-Generation TKIs through Pooled Analysis”","authors":"Byoung Chul Cho ,&nbsp;YuKyung Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.cllc.2025.11.013","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cllc.2025.11.013","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10490,"journal":{"name":"Clinical lung cancer","volume":"27 1","pages":"Pages 72-73"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145713567","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Clinical lung cancer
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1