Pub Date : 2024-10-31DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107731
Marco Antonio Morales-Osorio , Robinson Ramirez-Velez , Johana Mejía-Mejía , Laura Aline Martinez-Martinez , Fabian Román , Pedro Javier Lopez-Perez , Leidy Tatiana Ordoñez-Mora
Background
Fibromyalgia (FM) is a chronic musculoskeletal condition typically characterized by chronic pain, sleep disturbances, chronic fatigue, and cognitive problems. The present study aims to examine the efficacy of a pain neuroscience education program (PNE) in improving executive functions and pain intensity in patients with FM and compare them with those of standard treatment protocols.
Methods
This blinded, controlled clinical trial will compare changes in executive function and pain intensity between two groups. The first group will receive standard treatment supplemented with PNE, consisting of ten sessions spread over five weeks, with each session lasting 40–45 min. The main objective of this method is to remodel cognitive and emotional reactions to pain, challenging the idea that pain is directly related to injury and highlighting the influence of emotions, sleep, and physical activity on pain perception. The second group will receive only standard pharmacological treatment. The study sample will include 62 adults diagnosed with FM, according to initial sample size estimates based on previous evidence. A baseline assessment of baseline characteristics will be performed, after which patients will be randomly assigned to the PNE group or the control group. The results of the intervention will be evaluated and statistically compared after 5 weeks. This protocol complies with all relevant ethical guidelines. It has been approved by two institutional committees (Reference: NR2006; Conbioethics:21-CEI-004-20,170,829).
Conclusion
It is anticipated that this intervention will be a cost-effective and superior alternative to standard treatments.
Clinical trial registration: NCT05084300
背景纤维肌痛(FM)是一种慢性肌肉骨骼疾病,以慢性疼痛、睡眠障碍、慢性疲劳和认知问题为典型特征。本研究旨在探讨疼痛神经科学教育项目(PNE)在改善 FM 患者执行功能和疼痛强度方面的疗效,并将其与标准治疗方案进行比较。方法这项盲法对照临床试验将比较两组患者在执行功能和疼痛强度方面的变化。第一组将接受以 PNE 为辅的标准治疗,包括五个星期的十个疗程,每个疗程持续 40-45 分钟。这种方法的主要目的是重塑对疼痛的认知和情绪反应,挑战疼痛与受伤直接相关的观点,并强调情绪、睡眠和身体活动对疼痛感知的影响。第二组将只接受标准的药物治疗。根据以往证据对样本量的初步估计,研究样本将包括 62 名被诊断患有 FM 的成年人。在对基线特征进行基线评估后,患者将被随机分配到 PNE 组或对照组。5 周后将对干预结果进行评估和统计比较。本方案符合所有相关的伦理准则。该方案已获得两个机构委员会的批准(参考文献:NR2006;Conbioethics:21-CEI-004-20,170,829):临床试验注册:NCT05084300
{"title":"Efficacy of a pain neuroscience educational program in improving executive function and pain intensity in fibromyalgia patients (Fibrobrain project): Study protocol for a randomized controlled clinical trial","authors":"Marco Antonio Morales-Osorio , Robinson Ramirez-Velez , Johana Mejía-Mejía , Laura Aline Martinez-Martinez , Fabian Román , Pedro Javier Lopez-Perez , Leidy Tatiana Ordoñez-Mora","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107731","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107731","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Fibromyalgia (FM) is a chronic musculoskeletal condition typically characterized by chronic pain, sleep disturbances, chronic fatigue, and cognitive problems. The present study aims to examine the efficacy of a pain neuroscience education program (PNE) in improving executive functions and pain intensity in patients with FM and compare them with those of standard treatment protocols.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This blinded, controlled clinical trial will compare changes in executive function and pain intensity between two groups. The first group will receive standard treatment supplemented with PNE, consisting of ten sessions spread over five weeks, with each session lasting 40–45 min. The main objective of this method is to remodel cognitive and emotional reactions to pain, challenging the idea that pain is directly related to injury and highlighting the influence of emotions, sleep, and physical activity on pain perception. The second group will receive only standard pharmacological treatment. The study sample will include 62 adults diagnosed with FM, according to initial sample size estimates based on previous evidence. A baseline assessment of baseline characteristics will be performed, after which patients will be randomly assigned to the PNE group or the control group. The results of the intervention will be evaluated and statistically compared after 5 weeks. This protocol complies with all relevant ethical guidelines. It has been approved by two institutional committees (Reference: NR2006; Conbioethics:21-CEI-004-20,170,829).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>It is anticipated that this intervention will be a cost-effective and superior alternative to standard treatments.</div><div>Clinical trial registration: <span><span>NCT05084300</span><svg><path></path></svg></span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":"147 ","pages":"Article 107731"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142560823","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-28DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107732
Xintong Ju , Jake Solka , Estevan Pena , Ashley Kocher , Richard Davies , Jennifer Waljee , Frederic C. Blow , Kelley M. Kidwell , Maureen A. Walton , Anne C. Fernandez
Background
High-risk alcohol consumption in the weeks before and after surgery poses significant risks for postoperative recovery. Despite this, elective surgical patients are rarely offered alcohol-focused education, interventions, or treatment. This paper describes the protocol of a research study designed to evaluate the effectiveness of brief, non-pharmacological, therapeutic approaches to reduce alcohol use before and after surgery.
Methods
The Alcohol Screening and Preoperative Intervention Research (ASPIRE-2) study trial includes 440 elective, non-cancer, surgery patients ages 21–75 years-old who report high-risk alcohol use. This trial uses a Sequential, Multiple Assignment, Randomized Trial (SMART) design to test the effectiveness of adaptive interventions that include preoperative Virtual Health Coaching (VHC) or Enhanced Usual Care (EUC) followed by postoperative intervention strategies tailored to participant response to the preoperative study condition. Intervention “response” is defined as achieving low-risk alcohol use following the preoperative intervention. The primary aims of this study are to: 1) examine the effectiveness of adaptive interventions that begin with preoperative VHC compared to EUC in reducing high-risk alcohol use among elective surgical patients; and 2) identify the most effective postoperative strategy for lasting alcohol use reduction over a period of 12 months. Secondary and exploratory aims will identify the best performing pre-specified adaptive interventions, identify baseline and time-varying moderators of intervention effectiveness, and evaluate surgical outcomes.
Conclusion
The ASPIRE-2 study is an innovative approach to develop adaptive interventions to reduce alcohol use proximal to elective surgery when alcohol use poses short- and long-term risks to surgery and health.
{"title":"Study protocol for a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial to decrease alcohol use before and after surgery","authors":"Xintong Ju , Jake Solka , Estevan Pena , Ashley Kocher , Richard Davies , Jennifer Waljee , Frederic C. Blow , Kelley M. Kidwell , Maureen A. Walton , Anne C. Fernandez","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107732","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107732","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>High-risk alcohol consumption in the weeks before and after surgery poses significant risks for postoperative recovery. Despite this, elective surgical patients are rarely offered alcohol-focused education, interventions, or treatment. This paper describes the protocol of a research study designed to evaluate the effectiveness of brief, non-pharmacological, therapeutic approaches to reduce alcohol use before and after surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The Alcohol Screening and Preoperative Intervention Research (ASPIRE-2) study trial includes 440 elective, non-cancer, surgery patients ages 21–75 years-old who report high-risk alcohol use. This trial uses a Sequential, Multiple Assignment, Randomized Trial (SMART) design to test the effectiveness of adaptive interventions that include preoperative Virtual Health Coaching (VHC) or Enhanced Usual Care (EUC) followed by postoperative intervention strategies tailored to participant response to the preoperative study condition. Intervention “response” is defined as achieving low-risk alcohol use following the preoperative intervention. The primary aims of this study are to: 1) examine the effectiveness of adaptive interventions that begin with preoperative VHC compared to EUC in reducing high-risk alcohol use among elective surgical patients; and 2) identify the most effective postoperative strategy for lasting alcohol use reduction over a period of 12 months. Secondary and exploratory aims will identify the best performing pre-specified adaptive interventions, identify baseline and time-varying moderators of intervention effectiveness, and evaluate surgical outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The ASPIRE-2 study is an innovative approach to develop adaptive interventions to reduce alcohol use proximal to elective surgery when alcohol use poses short- and long-term risks to surgery and health.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":"147 ","pages":"Article 107732"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142560822","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-28DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107727
Jonathan B. Bricker , Brianna M. Sullivan , Kristin E. Mull , Juan Lavista-Ferres , Margarita Santiago-Torres
Globally, cigarette smoking results in over 8 million premature annual deaths. Addressing this issue requires high-impact, cost-effective population-level interventions for smoking cessation. Conversational chatbots offer a potential solution given the recent advancements in machine learning and large language models. Chatbots can deliver supportive, empathetic behaviors, personalized responses, and timely advice tailored to users' needs that is engaging through therapeutic conversations aimed at creating lasting social-emotional connections. Despite their promise, little is known about the efficacy and underlying mechanisms of chatbots for cigarette smoking cessation. We developed QuitBot, a quit smoking program of two to three-minute conversations covering topics ranging from motivations to quit, setting a quit date, choosing cessation medications, coping with triggers, maintaining abstinence, and recovering from a relapse. QuitBot employs conversational interactions, powered by an expert-curated large language model, allowing users to ask questions and receive personalized guidance on quitting smoking. Here, we report the design and execution of a randomized clinical trial comparing QuitBot (n = 760) against Smokefree TXT (SFT) text messaging program (n = 760), with a 12-month follow-up period. Both interventions include 42-days of content on motivations to quit, skills to cope with triggers, and relapse prevention. The key distinction between QuitBot and SFT is that QuitBot has communication and engagement features. This study aims to determine: whether QuitBot yields higher quit rates than SFT; and whether therapeutic alliance processes and engagement are mechanisms underlying cessation outcomes. Additionally, we will explore whether baseline factors including trust, social support, and demographics, moderate the efficacy of QuitBot.
{"title":"Efficacy of a conversational chatbot for cigarette smoking cessation: Protocol of the QuitBot full-scale randomized controlled trial","authors":"Jonathan B. Bricker , Brianna M. Sullivan , Kristin E. Mull , Juan Lavista-Ferres , Margarita Santiago-Torres","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107727","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107727","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Globally, cigarette smoking results in over 8 million premature annual deaths. Addressing this issue requires high-impact, cost-effective population-level interventions for smoking cessation. Conversational chatbots offer a potential solution given the recent advancements in machine learning and large language models. Chatbots can deliver supportive, empathetic behaviors, personalized responses, and timely advice tailored to users' needs that is engaging through therapeutic conversations aimed at creating lasting social-emotional connections. Despite their promise, little is known about the efficacy and underlying mechanisms of chatbots for cigarette smoking cessation. We developed QuitBot, a quit smoking program of two to three-minute conversations covering topics ranging from motivations to quit, setting a quit date, choosing cessation medications, coping with triggers, maintaining abstinence, and recovering from a relapse. QuitBot employs conversational interactions, powered by an expert-curated large language model, allowing users to ask questions and receive personalized guidance on quitting smoking. Here, we report the design and execution of a randomized clinical trial comparing QuitBot (<em>n</em> = 760) against Smokefree TXT (SFT) text messaging program (n = 760), with a 12-month follow-up period. Both interventions include 42-days of content on motivations to quit, skills to cope with triggers, and relapse prevention. The key distinction between QuitBot and SFT is that QuitBot has communication and engagement features. This study aims to determine: whether QuitBot yields higher quit rates than SFT; and whether therapeutic alliance processes and engagement are mechanisms underlying cessation outcomes. Additionally, we will explore whether baseline factors including trust, social support, and demographics, moderate the efficacy of QuitBot.</div><div><strong>Trial Registration number</strong> <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> <span><span>NCT04308759</span><svg><path></path></svg></span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":"147 ","pages":"Article 107727"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142567839","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-28DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107730
Steven L. Mansberger , Robert Fechtner , Krisi Lopez , Doug Hubatsch
Purpose
To identify the optimal dose of NCX 470, a nitric oxide (NO)-donating bimatoprost, for comparison to latanoprost in a phase 3 trial for open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHTN) using an adaptive dose selection design.
Patients and methods
In this prospective, multicenter trial, subjects were randomized 1:1:1 to NCX 470 0.065 %, NCX 470 0.1 %, or latanoprost 0.005 % dosed topically to both eyes once daily. After at least 30 subjects were assigned to each group, interim analysis was undertaken at 2 weeks and an independent committee selected the final NCX 470 dose for the full 12-week trial.
Results
The interim analysis included 103 subjects. The least-squares mean (95 % confidence interval [CI]) difference in diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP) was −1.51 mmHg (−2.88, −0.14) in the NCX 470 0.065 % group (p = 0.0308) and − 1.71 mmHg (−3.04, −0.38) in the NCX 470 0.1 % group (p = 0.0123), both favoring NCX 470 over latanoprost. The most common side effect was conjunctival/ocular hyperemia, the frequency and severity of which were similar in both NCX 470 dosing groups (p > 0.05). NCX 470 0.1 % was selected as the final dose and the NCX 470 0.065 % dose arm was terminated with subsequent subjects randomized 1:1 to NCX 470 0.1 % or latanoprost.
Conclusion
Both concentrations of the NO-donating bimatoprost NCX 470 lower IOP more than latanoprost following 2 weeks of daily therapy. This adaptive dose selection design allowed identification of the optimal dose of NCX 470 with reduced trial costs, recruitment time, and the number of patients exposed to study medication.
{"title":"A phase 3 adaptive dose selection trial of NCX 470, a nitric oxide-donating bimatoprost for open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension: The MONT BLANC study","authors":"Steven L. Mansberger , Robert Fechtner , Krisi Lopez , Doug Hubatsch","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107730","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107730","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To identify the optimal dose of NCX 470, a nitric oxide (NO)-donating bimatoprost, for comparison to latanoprost in a phase 3 trial for open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHTN) using an adaptive dose selection design.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><div>In this prospective, multicenter trial, subjects were randomized 1:1:1 to NCX 470 0.065 %, NCX 470 0.1 %, or latanoprost 0.005 % dosed topically to both eyes once daily. After at least 30 subjects were assigned to each group, interim analysis was undertaken at 2 weeks and an independent committee selected the final NCX 470 dose for the full 12-week trial.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The interim analysis included 103 subjects. The least-squares mean (95 % confidence interval [CI]) difference in diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP) was −1.51 mmHg (−2.88, −0.14) in the NCX 470 0.065 % group (<em>p</em> = 0.0308) and − 1.71 mmHg (−3.04, −0.38) in the NCX 470 0.1 % group (<em>p</em> = 0.0123), both favoring NCX 470 over latanoprost. The most common side effect was conjunctival/ocular hyperemia, the frequency and severity of which were similar in both NCX 470 dosing groups (<em>p</em> > 0.05). NCX 470 0.1 % was selected as the final dose and the NCX 470 0.065 % dose arm was terminated with subsequent subjects randomized 1:1 to NCX 470 0.1 % or latanoprost.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Both concentrations of the NO-donating bimatoprost NCX 470 lower IOP more than latanoprost following 2 weeks of daily therapy. This adaptive dose selection design allowed identification of the optimal dose of NCX 470 with reduced trial costs, recruitment time, and the number of patients exposed to study medication.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":"147 ","pages":"Article 107730"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142544197","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-15DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107717
Amber L. Kelly , Mary Elizabeth Baugh , Monica L. Ahrens , Abigail N. Valle , Rhianna M. Sullivan , Mary E. Oster , Mary E. Fowler , Bridget E. Carter , Brenda M. Davy , Alexandra L. Hanlon , Alexandra G. DiFeliceantonio
Overconsumption of ultra-processed foods (UPFs), which are linked with adverse health outcomes, is a growing public health concern. UPFs deliver highly bioavailable calories rapidly, which may contribute to their reinforcing potential and drive overconsumption. Our primary aim is to test the role of speed of nutrient availability on reward learning. We hypothesize that brain activity in reward related areas and behavioral preferences will be greater to a flavored drink predicting rapidly available calories (CS + Fast) compared with a flavored drink predicting more slowly available (CS + Slow) or no (CS-) calories. Participants (n = 64, aged 18–45 years, will consume 3 novel flavored, isosweet beverages containing 110 kcal of sucrose (CS + Fast), 110 kcal of maltodextrin (CS + Slow), or 0-kcal sucralose (CS-) 6 times in randomized, crossover order. Blood metabolites and indirect calorimetry measures, including metabolic rate and carbohydrate oxidation, will be assessed before and for 1 h after beverage consumption. Behavioral preference for beverages will be assessed in a pre- and post-test. Brain response to each flavor without calories will be assessed via functional magnetic resonance imaging in a post-test. Findings from this study will contribute to the understanding of basic mechanisms that may drive overconsumption of UPFs.
{"title":"Neural and metabolic factors in carbohydrate reward: Rationale, design, and methods for a flavor-nutrient learning paradigm in humans","authors":"Amber L. Kelly , Mary Elizabeth Baugh , Monica L. Ahrens , Abigail N. Valle , Rhianna M. Sullivan , Mary E. Oster , Mary E. Fowler , Bridget E. Carter , Brenda M. Davy , Alexandra L. Hanlon , Alexandra G. DiFeliceantonio","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107717","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107717","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Overconsumption of ultra-processed foods (UPFs), which are linked with adverse health outcomes, is a growing public health concern. UPFs deliver highly bioavailable calories rapidly, which may contribute to their reinforcing potential and drive overconsumption. Our primary aim is to test the role of speed of nutrient availability on reward learning. We hypothesize that brain activity in reward related areas and behavioral preferences will be greater to a flavored drink predicting rapidly available calories (CS + Fast) compared with a flavored drink predicting more slowly available (CS + Slow) or no (CS-) calories. Participants (<em>n</em> = 64, aged 18–45 years, will consume 3 novel flavored, isosweet beverages containing 110 kcal of sucrose (CS + Fast), 110 kcal of maltodextrin (CS + Slow), or 0-kcal sucralose (CS-) 6 times in randomized, crossover order. Blood metabolites and indirect calorimetry measures, including metabolic rate and carbohydrate oxidation, will be assessed before and for 1 h after beverage consumption. Behavioral preference for beverages will be assessed in a pre- and post-test. Brain response to each flavor without calories will be assessed via functional magnetic resonance imaging in a post-test. Findings from this study will contribute to the understanding of basic mechanisms that may drive overconsumption of UPFs.</div><div><strong>Trial registration:</strong> <span><span>clinicaltrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> registration #<span><span>NCT06053294</span><svg><path></path></svg></span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":"147 ","pages":"Article 107717"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142459892","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-15DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107715
Cristina Palacios, Julia Leone, Priscilla Clayton, Jacqueline Hernandez, María Angélica Trak-Fellermeier, Alison Macchi, Daniela Ramirez-Roggio, Yivani Cobo, Shanelle Bautista, Jeneene Connelly, Malik Elington, Jorge Romero, Rodolfo Galvan
Background: Pediatric recruitment into clinical trials is very challenging. A recruitment plan was designed to recruit healthy children (9–14 years) in a trial testing the 1-year effect of corn soluble fiber supplementation on bone mass. We evaluated the effectiveness and costs of the recruitment strategies used in this trial. Methods: The recruitment plan included “Traditional” (mailings, flyers, posters, visits, snowball, etc.) or “Online” (email campaigns, social media, website, etc.) strategies. All strategies led to the pre-screening online form, which asked how they learned about the study. This analysis includes the number of pre-screenings and enrollment (consents signed), ineligibility, socio-demographics, and costs per strategy. Differences were analyzed using ANOVA or chi-square. Results: 649 individuals completed the pre-screening; 37.1 % came from “Traditional”, 46.7 % from “Online”, 2.6 % from “Other”, and 13.6 % from “Unknown” strategies. The most successful strategies were related to Florida International University (posting flyers around campus and email campaigns). The main reasons for ineligibility were obesity (38.9 %) or outside the age range (22.7 %). A total of 48.4 % of the children enrolled came from “Traditional”, 50.2 % from “Online”, and 1.4 % from “Other” strategies. The cost per screened participant was $1112 for “Traditional” and $512 for “Online” strategies, and the cost per enrolled participant was $2704 for “Traditional” and $1454 for “Online” strategies. The highest costs were staff salary. Conclusion: “Online” strategies were more effective and had a lower implementation cost than “Traditional” strategies, although these were also important in achieving the recruitment goal. Future pediatric trials should consider some of these strategies and their costs.
{"title":"Effectiveness and costs of the recruitment strategies used in the MetA-Bone trial, a randomized clinical trial to test the effects of soluble corn fiber supplementation for 1 year in children","authors":"Cristina Palacios, Julia Leone, Priscilla Clayton, Jacqueline Hernandez, María Angélica Trak-Fellermeier, Alison Macchi, Daniela Ramirez-Roggio, Yivani Cobo, Shanelle Bautista, Jeneene Connelly, Malik Elington, Jorge Romero, Rodolfo Galvan","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107715","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107715","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Background: Pediatric recruitment into clinical trials is very challenging. A recruitment plan was designed to recruit healthy children (9–14 years) in a trial testing the 1-year effect of corn soluble fiber supplementation on bone mass. We evaluated the effectiveness and costs of the recruitment strategies used in this trial. Methods: The recruitment plan included “Traditional” (mailings, flyers, posters, visits, snowball, etc.) or “Online” (email campaigns, social media, website, etc.) strategies. All strategies led to the pre-screening online form, which asked how they learned about the study. This analysis includes the number of pre-screenings and enrollment (consents signed), ineligibility, socio-demographics, and costs per strategy. Differences were analyzed using ANOVA or chi-square. Results: 649 individuals completed the pre-screening; 37.1 % came from “Traditional”, 46.7 % from “Online”, 2.6 % from “Other”, and 13.6 % from “Unknown” strategies. The most successful strategies were related to Florida International University (posting flyers around campus and email campaigns). The main reasons for ineligibility were obesity (38.9 %) or outside the age range (22.7 %). A total of 48.4 % of the children enrolled came from “Traditional”, 50.2 % from “Online”, and 1.4 % from “Other” strategies. The cost per screened participant was $1112 for “Traditional” and $512 for “Online” strategies, and the cost per enrolled participant was $2704 for “Traditional” and $1454 for “Online” strategies. The highest costs were staff salary. Conclusion: “Online” strategies were more effective and had a lower implementation cost than “Traditional” strategies, although these were also important in achieving the recruitment goal. Future pediatric trials should consider some of these strategies and their costs.</div><div><span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> registry number: <span><span>NCT02916862</span><svg><path></path></svg></span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":"147 ","pages":"Article 107715"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142444903","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-15DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107716
Jeanean B. Naqvi , Brittany Olesen , Emily Greenstadt , Jacob Carson , Bess Marcus , Job Godino , Michelle Zive , Dawn Meyer , Michael Higgins , Lilliana Osuna , Rubi Gomez , Shira Dunsiger , Britta Larsen
Background
Latina adolescents report low levels of physical activity (PA) and high lifetime risk of lifestyle-related diseases. They also have high rates of using technology, suggesting interventions delivered through mobile devices may be effective for this population. The current paper describes recruitment methods and baseline study characteristics for Chicas Fuertes, a fully powered randomized trial of a mobile technology PA intervention.
Methods
Underactive Latina adolescents (aged 13–18) were recruited using social media and presentations at local schools and community organizations in San Diego, California. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to either the intervention (Fitbit, tailored texting, social media, and website) or control group. Baseline measures included demographics, psychosocial variables, and PA measured by the 7-Day Physical Activity Recall (PAR), ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometers, and Fitbits. Baseline data were collected from 2020 to 2023.
Results
Social media yielded the most contacts (465), but had the lowest chance of enrollment (14 %, vs. 52 % from school presentations). Participants (N = 160) were mostly second generation (68.8 %), and low income (61.8 %), but technology access was high (>99 %). Median self-reported moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) using the 7-Day PAR was 120 min/week (range 0–720), and median daily steps were 5222 (IQR 359). Median MVPA measured by ActiGraphs, however, was 0 min per week. There was no correlation between the 7-day PAR and ActiGraphs (. However, ActiGraph MVPA was correlated with total steps recorded by the Fitbit ().
Conclusions
Both remote and in-person approaches were successful in recruiting a sample that was underactive and low income, but had high technology use.
{"title":"Randomized controlled trial of a multiple technology-based physical activity intervention for Latina adolescents: Recruitment strategies and baseline data from the Chicas Fuertes trial","authors":"Jeanean B. Naqvi , Brittany Olesen , Emily Greenstadt , Jacob Carson , Bess Marcus , Job Godino , Michelle Zive , Dawn Meyer , Michael Higgins , Lilliana Osuna , Rubi Gomez , Shira Dunsiger , Britta Larsen","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107716","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107716","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Latina adolescents report low levels of physical activity (PA) and high lifetime risk of lifestyle-related diseases. They also have high rates of using technology, suggesting interventions delivered through mobile devices may be effective for this population. The current paper describes recruitment methods and baseline study characteristics for <em>Chicas Fuertes</em>, a fully powered randomized trial of a mobile technology PA intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Underactive Latina adolescents (aged 13–18) were recruited using social media and presentations at local schools and community organizations in San Diego, California. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to either the intervention (Fitbit, tailored texting, social media, and website) or control group. Baseline measures included demographics, psychosocial variables, and PA measured by the 7-Day Physical Activity Recall (PAR), ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometers, and Fitbits. Baseline data were collected from 2020 to 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Social media yielded the most contacts (465), but had the lowest chance of enrollment (14 %, vs. 52 % from school presentations). Participants (<em>N</em> = 160) were mostly second generation (68.8 %), and low income (61.8 %), but technology access was high (>99 %). Median self-reported moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) using the 7-Day PAR was 120 min/week (range 0–720), and median daily steps were 5222 (IQR 359). Median MVPA measured by ActiGraphs, however, was 0 min per week<strong>.</strong> There was no correlation between the 7-day PAR and ActiGraphs (<span><math><mi>ρ</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>.13</mn><mo>,</mo><mi>p</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>.12</mn><mo>)</mo></math></span>. However, ActiGraph MVPA was correlated with total steps recorded by the Fitbit (<span><math><mi>ρ</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>.38</mn><mo>,</mo><mi>p</mi><mo><</mo><mn>.001</mn></math></span>).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Both remote and in-person approaches were successful in recruiting a sample that was underactive and low income, but had high technology use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":"147 ","pages":"Article 107716"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142459893","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-11DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107711
Rebecca A. Krukowski , Kelsey R. Day , Wen You , Christine A. Pellegrini , Delia S. West
Background
Rural residents are more impacted by obesity and related comorbidities than their urban counterparts. Digital weight management interventions may produce meaningful weight loss among rural residents.
Objectives
The iREACH Rural Study aims to identify “high-touch” component(s) that contribute to meaningful weight loss (≥1.5 kg) at 6-months, over and above what the 24-week core online program produces. Three treatment components are assessed: group video sessions (yes/no); self-monitoring feedback (counselor-crafted/pre-scripted, modular); and individual coaching calls (yes/no).
Design
The iREACH Rural Study is a factorial experiment (n = 616).
Methods
Participants receive up to 3 “high-touch” components (weekly synchronous facilitated group video sessions, weekly counselor-crafted self-monitoring feedback, and individual coaching calls) to determine which contribute meaningfully to 6-month weight loss. Participants complete assessments at baseline, 2 months, 6 months, and 12 months. Weight loss at 6 months (primary outcome) and 12 months (secondary outcome) is measured by Bluetooth-enabled scales. The study seeks to identify the weight loss approach for underserved rural residents which optimizes weight change outcomes and also examines costs associated with delivering different treatment constellations.
Summary
The iREACH Rural Study is the first of its kind to isolate digital weight loss intervention components to determine which meaningfully contribute to long-term weight loss among rural residing individuals. The results may be used to refine digital weight loss programs by enhancing their effectiveness to allow broad dissemination.
{"title":"Addressing rural health disparities by optimizing “high-touch” intervention components in digital obesity treatment: The iREACH Rural study","authors":"Rebecca A. Krukowski , Kelsey R. Day , Wen You , Christine A. Pellegrini , Delia S. West","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107711","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107711","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Rural residents are more impacted by obesity and related comorbidities than their urban counterparts. Digital weight management interventions may produce meaningful weight loss among rural residents.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The iREACH Rural Study aims to identify “high-touch” component(s) that contribute to meaningful weight loss (≥1.5 kg) at 6-months, over and above what the 24-week core online program produces. Three treatment components are assessed: group video sessions (yes/no); self-monitoring feedback (counselor-crafted/pre-scripted, modular); and individual coaching calls (yes/no).</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>The iREACH Rural Study is a factorial experiment (<em>n</em> = 616).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Participants receive up to 3 “high-touch” components (weekly synchronous facilitated group video sessions, weekly counselor-crafted self-monitoring feedback, and individual coaching calls) to determine which contribute meaningfully to 6-month weight loss. Participants complete assessments at baseline, 2 months, 6 months, and 12 months. Weight loss at 6 months (primary outcome) and 12 months (secondary outcome) is measured by Bluetooth-enabled scales. The study seeks to identify the weight loss approach for underserved rural residents which optimizes weight change outcomes and also examines costs associated with delivering different treatment constellations.</div></div><div><h3>Summary</h3><div>The iREACH Rural Study is the first of its kind to isolate digital weight loss intervention components to determine which meaningfully contribute to long-term weight loss among rural residing individuals. The results may be used to refine digital weight loss programs by enhancing their effectiveness to allow broad dissemination.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":"147 ","pages":"Article 107711"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142459889","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-10DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107713
Samantha A. Carreon , Charles G. Minard , Sarah K. Lyons , Wendy Levy , Stephanie Camey , Kishan Desai , Brenda Duran , Randi Streisand , Barbara J. Anderson , Siripoom V. McKay , Tricia S. Tang , Sridevi Devaraj , Ryan Ramphul , Marisa E. Hilliard
Background
Type 1 diabetes (T1D) management is challenging for young adults, who are expected to transfer from the pediatric to adult T1D healthcare system while also managing typical developmental demands (e.g., social, financial, work/school, residential). Many young adults have extended gaps in care before following up in adult care, increasing risk for poor health outcomes. There are few evidence-based programs to support young adults with T1D to promote a timelier transition during this period. This paper reports on the design of DiaBetter Together, a randomized controlled trial to evaluate a 12-month Peer Mentor-delivered intervention compared to usual care among young adults with T1D during the transfer from pediatric to adult care.
Methods
One-hundred young adults (age 17–25) with T1D and 29 Peer Mentors enrolled in this randomized clinical trial. Peer Mentors are experienced, older young adults with T1D, trained by the study team to share transition experiences and strategies to successfully navigate the adult healthcare system, help young adults prepare for the first adult care visit, and use strengths-based support strategies to teach and model skills for managing T1D-related challenges.
Results
The primary outcome of the trial is HbA1c, and secondary outcomes include time to adult care, engagement in diabetes self-management behaviors, and psychosocial well-being.
Conclusion
The goal of this research is to evaluate a developmentally appropriate, supportive intervention that can improve T1D self-management and successful transfer of care during the difficult young adult years and promote optimal T1D health outcomes.
{"title":"DiaBetter Together: Clinical trial protocol for a strengths-based Peer Mentor intervention for young adults with type 1 diabetes transitioning to adult care","authors":"Samantha A. Carreon , Charles G. Minard , Sarah K. Lyons , Wendy Levy , Stephanie Camey , Kishan Desai , Brenda Duran , Randi Streisand , Barbara J. Anderson , Siripoom V. McKay , Tricia S. Tang , Sridevi Devaraj , Ryan Ramphul , Marisa E. Hilliard","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107713","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107713","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Type 1 diabetes (T1D) management is challenging for young adults, who are expected to transfer from the pediatric to adult T1D healthcare system while also managing typical developmental demands (e.g., social, financial, work/school, residential). Many young adults have extended gaps in care before following up in adult care, increasing risk for poor health outcomes. There are few evidence-based programs to support young adults with T1D to promote a timelier transition during this period. This paper reports on the design of DiaBetter Together, a randomized controlled trial to evaluate a 12-month Peer Mentor-delivered intervention compared to usual care among young adults with T1D during the transfer from pediatric to adult care.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>One-hundred young adults (age 17–25) with T1D and 29 Peer Mentors enrolled in this randomized clinical trial. Peer Mentors are experienced, older young adults with T1D, trained by the study team to share transition experiences and strategies to successfully navigate the adult healthcare system, help young adults prepare for the first adult care visit, and use strengths-based support strategies to teach and model skills for managing T1D-related challenges.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The primary outcome of the trial is HbA1c, and secondary outcomes include time to adult care, engagement in diabetes self-management behaviors, and psychosocial well-being.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The goal of this research is to evaluate a developmentally appropriate, supportive intervention that can improve T1D self-management and successful transfer of care during the difficult young adult years and promote optimal T1D health outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":"147 ","pages":"Article 107713"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142459891","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-10DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107712
N.L. Henry , J.M. Unger , R. Vaidya , A.K. Darke , T.C. Skaar , M.J. Fisch , D.L. Hershman
Background
Premenopausal women with early stage, high risk hormone receptor positive breast cancer are at risk of early discontinuation of adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET), primarily because of toxicity, which can increase the risk of disease recurrence and death. We hypothesize that identification of bothersome symptoms between clinic visits, and automated notification of clinicians about symptoms, will result in improved persistence with ET.
Methods
Pre- and perimenopausal women planning to receive adjuvant treatment with tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor plus ovarian function suppression or ablation for treatment of breast cancer are eligible. A total of 540 participants will be enrolled and randomized 1:1 to patient education with or without Active Symptom Monitoring (ASM). The ASM intervention includes 6 symptom questions (hot flashes, sadness, anxiety, insomnia, vaginal dryness, joint pain) that will be completed via text, email, or telephone weekly for 24 weeks, then every 4 weeks for 48 weeks. All participants will complete a battery of questionnaires every 12 weeks to examine symptoms, beliefs about medicine, self-efficacy, and ET adherence. Optional blood draws will be collected at baseline and after 12, 48, and 72 weeks of therapy to examine estradiol and ET concentrations. The primary endpoint is time to nonpersistence with initially prescribed ET within the first 72 weeks, evaluated using Kaplan-Meier plots and multivariable Cox regression.
Conclusion
We expect early identification and management of ET-related toxicities to improve persistence with breast cancer therapy, breast cancer outcomes, and quality of life for premenopausal women at high risk of breast cancer recurrence.
Clinicaltrials.govNCT05568472
背景患有早期、高风险激素受体阳性乳腺癌的绝经妇女面临着过早中断辅助内分泌治疗(ET)的风险,这主要是因为毒性会增加疾病复发和死亡的风险。我们假设,在就诊间隙发现令人烦恼的症状,并将症状自动通知临床医生,将提高 ET 的坚持率。方法 计划接受他莫昔芬或芳香化酶抑制剂加卵巢功能抑制或消融辅助治疗乳腺癌的绝经前和绝经期妇女均符合条件。共有 540 名参与者将被登记,并按 1:1 随机分配接受患者教育,同时接受或不接受主动症状监测 (ASM)。ASM 干预包括 6 个症状问题(潮热、悲伤、焦虑、失眠、阴道干涩、关节疼痛),这些问题将在 24 周内每周通过短信、电子邮件或电话完成,然后在 48 周内每 4 周完成一次。所有参与者将每 12 周完成一次问卷调查,以了解症状、对药物的看法、自我效能和坚持服药的情况。在基线期以及治疗 12、48 和 72 周后,将选择性地抽血检查雌二醇和 ET 浓度。主要终点是在最初开具的 72 周内不坚持使用 ET 的时间,使用 Kaplan-Meier 图和多变量 Cox 回归进行评估。结论:我们希望及早识别和处理 ET 相关毒性,以提高乳腺癌复发风险高的绝经前妇女的乳腺癌治疗坚持率、乳腺癌预后和生活质量。
{"title":"Active symptom monitoring for premenopausal women with breast cancer initiating adjuvant endocrine therapy: Protocol for the SWOG S2010 randomized controlled efficacy trial","authors":"N.L. Henry , J.M. Unger , R. Vaidya , A.K. Darke , T.C. Skaar , M.J. Fisch , D.L. Hershman","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107712","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107712","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Premenopausal women with early stage, high risk hormone receptor positive breast cancer are at risk of early discontinuation of adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET), primarily because of toxicity, which can increase the risk of disease recurrence and death. We hypothesize that identification of bothersome symptoms between clinic visits, and automated notification of clinicians about symptoms, will result in improved persistence with ET.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Pre- and perimenopausal women planning to receive adjuvant treatment with tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor plus ovarian function suppression or ablation for treatment of breast cancer are eligible. A total of 540 participants will be enrolled and randomized 1:1 to patient education with or without Active Symptom Monitoring (ASM). The ASM intervention includes 6 symptom questions (hot flashes, sadness, anxiety, insomnia, vaginal dryness, joint pain) that will be completed via text, email, or telephone weekly for 24 weeks, then every 4 weeks for 48 weeks. All participants will complete a battery of questionnaires every 12 weeks to examine symptoms, beliefs about medicine, self-efficacy, and ET adherence. Optional blood draws will be collected at baseline and after 12, 48, and 72 weeks of therapy to examine estradiol and ET concentrations. The primary endpoint is time to nonpersistence with initially prescribed ET within the first 72 weeks, evaluated using Kaplan-Meier plots and multivariable Cox regression.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>We expect early identification and management of ET-related toxicities to improve persistence with breast cancer therapy, breast cancer outcomes, and quality of life for premenopausal women at high risk of breast cancer recurrence.</div><div><span><span>Clinicaltrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> <span><span>NCT05568472</span><svg><path></path></svg></span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":"147 ","pages":"Article 107712"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142444902","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}