首页 > 最新文献

Contraception: X最新文献

英文 中文
Dilation and evacuation versus medication abortion at 15–24 weeks of gestation in low-middle income country: A retrospective cohort study 在中低收入国家,妊娠 15-24 周时进行扩宫和排空手术与药物流产的比较:回顾性队列研究
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.conx.2024.100110
Abraham Fessehaye Sium, Amani Nureddin Abdu, Zerihun Beyene

Objective

To compare the effectiveness and safety of dilation and evacuation (D&E) to that of medication abortion at 15–24 weeks in a low-middle income country.

Study design

We conducted a retrospective cohort on effectiveness and safety of D&E vs medication abortion at 15–24 weeks in an Ethiopian setting over a year (January 1–December 31, 2023). We looked at success (need for additional procedure) of both abortion procedures and their complication rates. Hemorrhage, infection, uterine perforation/rupture, and cervical tear were the complications we compared between the groups (D&E group vs medication abortion group). P-value less than 0.05 and Adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with 95% CI were used to present results significance.

Results

A total of 225 abortion cases (162 medication abortion cases and 63 D&E cases) at gestational age of 15–24 weeks were included in the final analysis. The mean gestational age was 18 ± 2.8 weeks in the D&E group compared to 21 ± 3 weeks in the medication abortion group (p-value < 0.001). The overall procedure effectiveness between the abortion procedures was similar (95.2% vs 96.9% in the D&E group and medication abortion groups, p-value = 0.542). D&E (AOR = 2.92 [95% CI = 0.62–13.69]) was not associated with increased overall complications compared to medication abortion, after controlling for parity, gestational age, and history of prior uterine scar.

Conclusion

We found both abortion methods (D&E and medication abortion) are effective with comparable complication rates.

Implications

D&E and medication abortion are safe and effective methods of abortion for gestations up to 24 weeks even in a low-middle income country (LMIC) setting; as such, greater resources are needed to ensure to increase availability of D&E in order for women to have a choice in their treatment options.

研究设计我们在埃塞俄比亚进行了一项回顾性队列研究,对 15-24 周扩张排空术(D&E)与药物流产的有效性和安全性进行了为期一年(2023 年 1 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日)的比较。我们调查了两种人工流产手术的成功率(是否需要额外手术)及其并发症发生率。出血、感染、子宫穿孔/破裂和宫颈撕裂是我们比较的两组(D&E 组和药物流产组)并发症。P 值小于 0.05 和调整后的几率比(AOR)(95% CI)用于表示结果的显著性。结果 最终分析共纳入 225 例孕龄在 15-24 周的人工流产病例(药物流产 162 例,D&E 63 例)。D&E组的平均孕周为18 ± 2.8周,而药物流产组的平均孕周为21 ± 3周(P值为0.001)。两种人工流产术的总有效率相似(D&E 组和药物流产组的有效率分别为 95.2% 和 96.9%,P 值 = 0.542)。与药物流产相比,D&E(AOR = 2.92 [95% CI = 0.62-13.69])与总体并发症的增加无关,在控制了奇偶数、妊娠年龄和既往子宫疤痕史之后,D&E(AOR = 2.92 [95% CI = 0.62-13.69])与并发症的增加无关。意义即使在中低收入国家(LMIC),D&E 和药物流产对妊娠 24 周以内的妇女来说都是安全有效的流产方法;因此,需要更多资源来确保增加 D&E 的可用性,以便妇女在治疗方案中有所选择。
{"title":"Dilation and evacuation versus medication abortion at 15–24 weeks of gestation in low-middle income country: A retrospective cohort study","authors":"Abraham Fessehaye Sium,&nbsp;Amani Nureddin Abdu,&nbsp;Zerihun Beyene","doi":"10.1016/j.conx.2024.100110","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.conx.2024.100110","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To compare the effectiveness and safety of dilation and evacuation (D&amp;E) to that of medication abortion at 15–24 weeks in a low-middle income country.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>We conducted a retrospective cohort on effectiveness and safety of D&amp;E vs medication abortion at 15–24 weeks in an Ethiopian setting over a year (January 1–December 31, 2023). We looked at success (need for additional procedure) of both abortion procedures and their complication rates. Hemorrhage, infection, uterine perforation/rupture, and cervical tear were the complications we compared between the groups (D&amp;E group vs medication abortion group). <em>P</em>-value less than 0.05 and Adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with 95% CI were used to present results significance.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 225 abortion cases (162 medication abortion cases and 63 D&amp;E cases) at gestational age of 15–24 weeks were included in the final analysis. The mean gestational age was 18 ± 2.8 weeks in the D&amp;E group compared to 21 ± 3 weeks in the medication abortion group (<em>p</em>-value<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001). The overall procedure effectiveness between the abortion procedures was similar (95.2% vs 96.9% in the D&amp;E group and medication abortion groups, <em>p</em>-value<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.542). D&amp;E (AOR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->2.92 [95% CI<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.62–13.69]) was not associated with increased overall complications compared to medication abortion, after controlling for parity, gestational age, and history of prior uterine scar.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We found both abortion methods (D&amp;E and medication abortion) are effective with comparable complication rates.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>D&amp;E and medication abortion are safe and effective methods of abortion for gestations up to 24 weeks even in a low-middle income country (LMIC) setting; as such, greater resources are needed to ensure to increase availability of D&amp;E in order for women to have a choice in their treatment options.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10655,"journal":{"name":"Contraception: X","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151624000078/pdfft?md5=f4cf2c2381c0def0532e91cb2471a6ce&pid=1-s2.0-S2590151624000078-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142084003","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Experiences of delay-causing obstacles and mental health at the time of abortion seeking 寻求堕胎时遇到的导致延误的障碍和心理健康。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.conx.2024.100105
Ortal Wasser , Lauren J. Ralph , Shelly Kaller , M. Antonia Biggs

Objectives

The delays and challenges people encounter when seeking abortion are well-documented, but their psychological implications are understudied. Aiming to fill this gap, we explored the associations between experiences of delay-causing obstacles to abortion care and adverse mental health symptoms among individuals seeking abortion care.

Study design

In 2019, we surveyed 784 people (of 1092 approached) ages 15–45 accessing abortion care in four clinics in abortion-supportive states: California, Illinois, and New Mexico. We conducted multivariable Poisson regressions to examine associations between experiencing delay-causing obstacles to abortion care and stress, anxiety, and depression at the abortion appointment. We also used Poisson regression to examine whether some individuals are more likely to experience delay-causing obstacles than others.

Results

Three in five participants (58%) experienced delay-causing obstacles when accessing abortion care. The most prevalent obstacles were cost-related (45%), followed by access-related (43%), and travel time-related (35%) delays. In adjusted analyses, experiencing any type of delay-causing obstacle to abortion care was significantly associated with more symptoms of stress, anxiety, and depression and higher risk of anxiety and depressive disorders. Participants were more likely to experience delay-causing obstacles if they traveled from another state or over 100 miles to reach the clinic, sought abortion beyond 13 weeks gestation, lacked money for unexpected expenses, and found it difficult to pay for the abortion.

Conclusion

Abortion is a time-sensitive healthcare, but most individuals are forced to delay care due to various obstacles that may have a negative impact on their psychological well-being.

Implications

Obstacles causing delays in accessing abortion care may contribute to elevated symptoms of stress, anxiety, and depression and higher risk of anxiety and depressive disorders for abortion patients. As restrictive policies increase, delays are likely to worsen, potentially leading to psychological harm for people seeking abortion.

目标人们在寻求人工流产时遇到的延误和挑战已被充分记录,但其心理影响却未得到充分研究。为了填补这一空白,我们探讨了在寻求人工流产护理的个人中,导致人工流产护理延迟的障碍经历与不良心理健康症状之间的关联。研究设计2019 年,我们调查了在支持人工流产的州的四家诊所接受人工流产护理的 784 名 15-45 岁的患者(共 1092 人):加利福尼亚州、伊利诺伊州和新墨西哥州。我们进行了多变量泊松回归,以研究在流产预约时遇到导致流产护理延迟的障碍与压力、焦虑和抑郁之间的关联。我们还使用泊松回归法研究了某些人是否比其他人更容易遇到导致延误的障碍。结果五分之三的参与者(58%)在获得堕胎护理时遇到了导致延误的障碍。最普遍的障碍是与费用相关的障碍(45%),其次是与就医相关的障碍(43%)和与旅行时间相关的障碍(35%)。在调整后的分析中,流产护理时遇到任何类型的延误障碍都与更多的压力、焦虑和抑郁症状以及更高的焦虑症和抑郁症风险密切相关。如果受试者从另一个州或超过 100 英里之外的地方前往诊所、妊娠超过 13 周才寻求堕胎、没有钱支付意外费用,以及发现难以支付堕胎费用,则更有可能遇到导致延误的障碍。结论人工流产是一项时效性很强的医疗服务,但大多数人却因为各种障碍而被迫推迟接受治疗,这可能会对他们的心理健康产生负面影响。影响造成人工流产治疗延误的障碍可能会导致人工流产患者的压力、焦虑和抑郁症状升高,以及患焦虑症和抑郁症的风险升高。随着限制性政策的增加,延误可能会加剧,从而可能导致寻求人工流产者的心理伤害。
{"title":"Experiences of delay-causing obstacles and mental health at the time of abortion seeking","authors":"Ortal Wasser ,&nbsp;Lauren J. Ralph ,&nbsp;Shelly Kaller ,&nbsp;M. Antonia Biggs","doi":"10.1016/j.conx.2024.100105","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.conx.2024.100105","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The delays and challenges people encounter when seeking abortion are well-documented, but their psychological implications are understudied. Aiming to fill this gap, we explored the associations between experiences of delay-causing obstacles to abortion care and adverse mental health symptoms among individuals seeking abortion care.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>In 2019, we surveyed 784 people (of 1092 approached) ages 15–45 accessing abortion care in four clinics in abortion-supportive states: California, Illinois, and New Mexico. We conducted multivariable Poisson regressions to examine associations between experiencing delay-causing obstacles to abortion care and stress, anxiety, and depression at the abortion appointment. We also used Poisson regression to examine whether some individuals are more likely to experience delay-causing obstacles than others.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Three in five participants (58%) experienced delay-causing obstacles when accessing abortion care. The most prevalent obstacles were cost-related (45%), followed by access-related (43%), and travel time-related (35%) delays. In adjusted analyses, experiencing any type of delay-causing obstacle to abortion care was significantly associated with more symptoms of stress, anxiety, and depression and higher risk of anxiety and depressive disorders. Participants were more likely to experience delay-causing obstacles if they traveled from another state or over 100 miles to reach the clinic, sought abortion beyond 13 weeks gestation, lacked money for unexpected expenses, and found it difficult to pay for the abortion.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Abortion is a time-sensitive healthcare, but most individuals are forced to delay care due to various obstacles that may have a negative impact on their psychological well-being.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>Obstacles causing delays in accessing abortion care may contribute to elevated symptoms of stress, anxiety, and depression and higher risk of anxiety and depressive disorders for abortion patients. As restrictive policies increase, delays are likely to worsen, potentially leading to psychological harm for people seeking abortion.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10655,"journal":{"name":"Contraception: X","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151624000029/pdfft?md5=9afc1159cd88ea22b96691c7ff671cb7&pid=1-s2.0-S2590151624000029-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140088463","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A new vision for male contraception research and development 男性避孕研究与开发的新愿景。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.conx.2024.100108
Regine Sitruk-Ware, Jim Sailer, David Serfaty, Richard Anderson
{"title":"A new vision for male contraception research and development","authors":"Regine Sitruk-Ware,&nbsp;Jim Sailer,&nbsp;David Serfaty,&nbsp;Richard Anderson","doi":"10.1016/j.conx.2024.100108","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.conx.2024.100108","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10655,"journal":{"name":"Contraception: X","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11707598/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142945935","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluation of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy (LMUP) among a nationally representative sample of pregnant and postpartum women Ethiopia 在埃塞俄比亚孕妇和产后妇女的全国代表性样本中评估伦敦计划外怀孕措施(LMUP)
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.conx.2023.100094
Celia Karp , Caroline Moreau , Solomon Shiferaw , Assefa Seme , Mahari Yihdego , Linnea A. Zimmerman

Objectives

Rigorous measurement of pregnancy preferences is needed to address reproductive health needs. The London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy (LMUP), developed in the UK, has been adapted for low-income countries. Psychometric properties of LMUP items remain uncertain in contexts with limited access to and use of health services.

Study design

This cross-sectional study examines the six-item LMUP’s psychometric properties among a nationally representative sample of 2855 pregnant and postpartum women in Ethiopia. Principal components analysis (PCA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) estimated psychometric properties. Hypothesis testing examined associations between the LMUP and other measurement approaches of pregnancy preferences using descriptive statistics and linear regression.

Results

The six-item LMUP had acceptable reliability (α = 0.77); two behavioral items (contraception, preconception care) were poorly correlated with the total scale. A four-item measure demonstrated higher reliability (α = 0.90). Construct validity via PCA and CFA indicated the four-item LMUP’s unidimensionality and good model fit; all hypotheses related to the four-item LMUP and other measurement approaches were met.

Conclusions

Measurement of women’s pregnancy planning in Ethiopia may be improved through use of a four-item version of the LMUP scale. This measurement approach can inform family planning services to better align with women’s reproductive goals.

Implications

Improved pregnancy preference measures are needed to understand reproductive health needs. A four-item version of the LMUP is highly reliable in Ethiopia, offering a robust and concise metric for assessing women’s orientations toward a current or recent pregnancy and tailoring care to support them in achieving their reproductive goals.

目的需要严格测量妊娠偏好,以满足生殖健康需求。英国制定的伦敦计划外妊娠测量(LMUP)已针对低收入国家进行了调整。在获得和使用卫生服务有限的情况下,LMUP项目的心理测量特性仍然不确定。研究设计这项横断面研究在埃塞俄比亚2855名孕妇和产后妇女的全国代表性样本中检验了六项LMUP的心理测量特性。主成分分析(PCA)和验证性因素分析(CFA)估计了心理测量特性。假设检验使用描述性统计和线性回归检验了LMUP和其他妊娠偏好测量方法之间的相关性。结果六项LMUP具有可接受的信度(α=0.77);两个行为项目(避孕、孕前护理)与总量表的相关性很差。四项测量显示出较高的信度(α=0.90)。通过PCA和CFA的结构有效性表明四项LMUP的单维度性和良好的模型拟合性;符合与四项LMUP和其他测量方法相关的所有假设。结论通过使用LMUP量表的四项版本,可以改善埃塞俄比亚妇女计划生育的测量。这种衡量方法可以为计划生育服务提供信息,以便更好地与妇女的生殖目标保持一致。含义需要改进妊娠偏好措施,以了解生殖健康需求。LMUP的四项版本在埃塞俄比亚非常可靠,为评估女性当前或近期怀孕的倾向提供了一个有力而简洁的指标,并为她们实现生育目标提供了量身定制的护理。
{"title":"Evaluation of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy (LMUP) among a nationally representative sample of pregnant and postpartum women Ethiopia","authors":"Celia Karp ,&nbsp;Caroline Moreau ,&nbsp;Solomon Shiferaw ,&nbsp;Assefa Seme ,&nbsp;Mahari Yihdego ,&nbsp;Linnea A. Zimmerman","doi":"10.1016/j.conx.2023.100094","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.conx.2023.100094","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Rigorous measurement of pregnancy preferences is needed to address reproductive health needs. The London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy (LMUP), developed in the UK, has been adapted for low-income countries. Psychometric properties of LMUP items remain uncertain in contexts with limited access to and use of health services.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>This cross-sectional study examines the six-item LMUP’s psychometric properties among a nationally representative sample of 2855 pregnant and postpartum women in Ethiopia. Principal components analysis (PCA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) estimated psychometric properties. Hypothesis testing examined associations between the LMUP and other measurement approaches of pregnancy preferences using descriptive statistics and linear regression.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The six-item LMUP had acceptable reliability (α = 0.77); two behavioral items (contraception, preconception care) were poorly correlated with the total scale. A four-item measure demonstrated higher reliability (α = 0.90). Construct validity via PCA and CFA indicated the four-item LMUP’s unidimensionality and good model fit; all hypotheses related to the four-item LMUP and other measurement approaches were met.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Measurement of women’s pregnancy planning in Ethiopia may be improved through use of a four-item version of the LMUP scale. This measurement approach can inform family planning services to better align with women’s reproductive goals.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>Improved pregnancy preference measures are needed to understand reproductive health needs. A four-item version of the LMUP is highly reliable in Ethiopia, offering a robust and concise metric for assessing women’s orientations toward a current or recent pregnancy and tailoring care to support them in achieving their reproductive goals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10655,"journal":{"name":"Contraception: X","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100094"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10176025/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9829713","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Clinical outcomes of intrauterine device insertions by newly trained providers: The ECHO trial experience 新培训提供者宫内节育器插入的临床结果:ECHO试验经验
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.conx.2023.100092
Irina Yacobson , Valentine Wanga , Khatija Ahmed , Tsungai Chipato , Peter Gichangi , James Kiarie , Cheryl Louw , Susan Morrison , Margaret Moss , Nelly R. Mugo , Thesla Palanee-Phillips , Melanie Pleaner , Caitlin W. Scoville , Katherine K. Thomas , Kavita Nanda , for the Evidence for Contraceptive Options and HIV Outcomes (ECHO) Trial Consortium

Objectives

To assess the rates of failed insertion, expulsion, and perforation when intrauterine device (IUD) insertions were done by newly trained clinicians, and to examine factors that may affect these outcomes.

Study design

We evaluated skill-based outcomes following IUD insertion at 12 African sites in a secondary analysis of the Evidence for Contraceptive Options and HIV Outcomes (ECHO) randomized trial. Before trial initiation, we provided competency-based IUD training to clinicians and offered ongoing clinical support. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to examine factors associated with expulsion.

Results

Among 2582 IUD acceptors who underwent first attempted IUD insertion, 141 experienced insertion failure (5.46%) and seven had uterine perforation (0.27%). Perforation was more common among breastfeeding women within three months postpartum (0.65%) compared with non-breastfeeding women (0.22%). We recorded 493 expulsions (15.5 per 100 person-years, 95% confidence interval [CI] 14.1─16.9): 383 partial and 110 complete. The risk of IUD expulsion was lower among women older than 24 years (aHR 0.63, 95% CI 0.50─0.78) and may be higher among nulliparous women. (aHR 1.65, 95% CI 0.97─2.82). Breastfeeding (aHR 0.94, 95% CI 0.72─1.22) had no significant effect on expulsion. IUD expulsion rate was highest during the first three months of the trial.

Conclusions

IUD insertion failure and uterine perforation rates in our study were comparable to those reported in the literature. These results suggest that training, ongoing support, and opportunities to apply new skills were effective in ensuring good clinical outcomes for women receiving IUD insertion by newly trained providers.

Implications

Data from this study support recommendations to program managers, policymakers, and clinicians that IUDs can be inserted safely in resource-constrained settings when providers receive appropriate training and support.

目的评估由新培训的临床医生进行宫内节育器(IUD)插入时,插入、排出和穿孔失败的发生率,并检查可能影响这些结果的因素。研究设计我们在对避孕选择和HIV结果证据(ECHO)随机试验的二次分析中,评估了在12个非洲地区放置宫内节育器后基于技能的结果。在试验开始之前,我们为临床医生提供了基于能力的宫内节育器培训,并提供持续的临床支持。我们使用Cox比例风险回归来检验与驱逐相关的因素。结果2582名首次尝试宫内节育器插入的宫内节育器受体中,141人(5.46%)插入失败,7人出现子宫穿孔(0.27%)。与非母乳喂养妇女(0.22%)相比,产后3个月内母乳喂养妇女穿孔更常见(0.65%)─16.9):383部分和110完整。24岁以上女性宫内节育器排出的风险较低(aHR 0.63,95%CI 0.50─0.78),在未产妇中可能更高。(aHR 1.65,95%CI 0.97─2.82)。母乳喂养(aHR 0.94,95%CI 0.72─1.22)对驱逐没有显著影响。宫内节育器排出率在试验的前三个月最高。结论本研究中sIUD插入失败率和子宫穿孔率与文献报道相当。这些结果表明,培训、持续的支持和应用新技能的机会有效地确保了接受新培训的提供者插入宫内节育器的妇女获得良好的临床结果。含义本研究的数据支持向项目经理、决策者和临床医生提出的建议,即当提供者接受适当的培训和支持时,宫内节育器可以安全地插入资源受限的环境中。
{"title":"Clinical outcomes of intrauterine device insertions by newly trained providers: The ECHO trial experience","authors":"Irina Yacobson ,&nbsp;Valentine Wanga ,&nbsp;Khatija Ahmed ,&nbsp;Tsungai Chipato ,&nbsp;Peter Gichangi ,&nbsp;James Kiarie ,&nbsp;Cheryl Louw ,&nbsp;Susan Morrison ,&nbsp;Margaret Moss ,&nbsp;Nelly R. Mugo ,&nbsp;Thesla Palanee-Phillips ,&nbsp;Melanie Pleaner ,&nbsp;Caitlin W. Scoville ,&nbsp;Katherine K. Thomas ,&nbsp;Kavita Nanda ,&nbsp;for the Evidence for Contraceptive Options and HIV Outcomes (ECHO) Trial Consortium","doi":"10.1016/j.conx.2023.100092","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.conx.2023.100092","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To assess the rates of failed insertion, expulsion, and perforation when intrauterine device (IUD) insertions were done by newly trained clinicians, and to examine factors that may affect these outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>We evaluated skill-based outcomes following IUD insertion at 12 African sites in a secondary analysis of the Evidence for Contraceptive Options and HIV Outcomes (ECHO) randomized trial. Before trial initiation, we provided competency-based IUD training to clinicians and offered ongoing clinical support. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to examine factors associated with expulsion.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 2582 IUD acceptors who underwent first attempted IUD insertion, 141 experienced insertion failure (5.46%) and seven had uterine perforation (0.27%). Perforation was more common among breastfeeding women within three months postpartum (0.65%) compared with non-breastfeeding women (0.22%). We recorded 493 expulsions (15.5 per 100 person-years, 95% confidence interval [CI] 14.1─16.9): 383 partial and 110 complete. The risk of IUD expulsion was lower among women older than 24 years (aHR 0.63, 95% CI 0.50─0.78) and may be higher among nulliparous women. (aHR 1.65, 95% CI 0.97─2.82). Breastfeeding (aHR 0.94, 95% CI 0.72─1.22) had no significant effect on expulsion. IUD expulsion rate was highest during the first three months of the trial.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>IUD insertion failure and uterine perforation rates in our study were comparable to those reported in the literature. These results suggest that training, ongoing support, and opportunities to apply new skills were effective in ensuring good clinical outcomes for women receiving IUD insertion by newly trained providers.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>Data from this study support recommendations to program managers, policymakers, and clinicians that IUDs can be inserted safely in resource-constrained settings when providers receive appropriate training and support.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10655,"journal":{"name":"Contraception: X","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100092"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10176026/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10139740","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
“If I use family planning, I may have trouble getting pregnant next time I want to”: A multicountry survey-based exploration of perceived contraceptive-induced fertility impairment and its relationship to contraceptive behaviors “如果我使用计划生育,下次我想要怀孕的时候可能会有困难”:一项基于多国调查的关于避孕药引起的生育障碍及其与避孕行为的关系的探索
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.conx.2023.100093
Suzanne O. Bell , Celia Karp , Caroline Moreau , PMA Principal Investigators Group , Alison Gemmill

Objectives

We aim to assess women’s perceptions regarding contraceptive effects on fertility across a diversity of settings in sub-Saharan Africa and how they vary by women’s characteristics. We also aim to examine how such beliefs relate to women’s contraceptive practices and intentions.

Study design

This study uses cross-sectional survey data among women aged 15 to 49 in nine sub-Saharan African geographies from the Performance Monitoring for Action project. Our main measure of interest assessed women’s perceptions of contraceptive-induced fertility impairment. We examined factors related to this belief and explored the association between perceptions of contraceptive-induced fertility impairment and use of medicalized contraception (intrauterine device, implant, injectable, pills, emergency contraception) and intention to use contraception (among nonusers).

Results

Between 20% and 40% of women across study sites agreed or strongly agreed that contraception would lead to later difficulties becoming pregnant. Women at risk of an unintended pregnancy who believed contraception could cause fertility impairment had reduced odds of using medicalized contraception in five sites; aORs ranged from 0.07 to 0.62. Likewise, contraceptive nonusers who wanted a/another child and perceived contraception could cause fertility impairment were less likely to intend to use contraception in seven sites, with aORs between 0.34 and 0.66.

Conclusions

Our multicountry study findings indicate women’s perception of contraceptive-induced fertility impairment is common across diverse sub-Saharan African settings, likely acting as a deterrent to using medicalized contraceptive methods.

Implications

Findings from this study can help improve reproductive health programs by addressing concerns about contraception to help women achieve their reproductive goals.

目的我们旨在评估撒哈拉以南非洲不同环境中女性对避孕措施对生育能力的影响的看法,以及这些看法如何因女性特征而异。我们还旨在研究这种信念与妇女的避孕做法和意图之间的关系。研究设计本研究使用了行动绩效监测项目中撒哈拉以南非洲九个地区15至49岁女性的横断面调查数据。我们感兴趣的主要指标评估了女性对避孕引起的生育障碍的看法。我们研究了与这一观点相关的因素,并探讨了避孕引起的生育障碍的认知与药物避孕(宫内节育器、植入物、注射物、药丸、紧急避孕)的使用和避孕意图(非使用者)之间的关系避孕会导致以后怀孕困难。有意外怀孕风险的女性认为避孕会导致生育障碍,在五个地点使用药物避孕的几率降低;aOR在0.07-0.62之间。同样,在七个地区,想要一个/另一个孩子并且认为避孕会导致生育障碍的非避孕者不太可能打算避孕,aOR在0.34至0.66之间。结论我们的多国研究结果表明,在撒哈拉以南非洲的不同环境中,女性对避孕导致的生育障碍的看法很普遍,可能对使用药物避孕方法起到威慑作用。这项研究的结果可以通过解决人们对避孕的担忧来帮助女性实现生育目标,从而有助于改善生殖健康计划。
{"title":"“If I use family planning, I may have trouble getting pregnant next time I want to”: A multicountry survey-based exploration of perceived contraceptive-induced fertility impairment and its relationship to contraceptive behaviors","authors":"Suzanne O. Bell ,&nbsp;Celia Karp ,&nbsp;Caroline Moreau ,&nbsp;PMA Principal Investigators Group ,&nbsp;Alison Gemmill","doi":"10.1016/j.conx.2023.100093","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.conx.2023.100093","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>We aim to assess women’s perceptions regarding contraceptive effects on fertility across a diversity of settings in sub-Saharan Africa and how they vary by women’s characteristics. We also aim to examine how such beliefs relate to women’s contraceptive practices and intentions.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>This study uses cross-sectional survey data among women aged 15 to 49 in nine sub-Saharan African geographies from the Performance Monitoring for Action project. Our main measure of interest assessed women’s perceptions of contraceptive-induced fertility impairment. We examined factors related to this belief and explored the association between perceptions of contraceptive-induced fertility impairment and use of medicalized contraception (intrauterine device, implant, injectable, pills, emergency contraception) and intention to use contraception (among nonusers).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Between 20% and 40% of women across study sites agreed or strongly agreed that contraception would lead to later difficulties becoming pregnant. Women at risk of an unintended pregnancy who believed contraception could cause fertility impairment had reduced odds of using medicalized contraception in five sites; aORs ranged from 0.07 to 0.62. Likewise, contraceptive nonusers who wanted a/another child and perceived contraception could cause fertility impairment were less likely to intend to use contraception in seven sites, with aORs between 0.34 and 0.66.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our multicountry study findings indicate women’s perception of contraceptive-induced fertility impairment is common across diverse sub-Saharan African settings, likely acting as a deterrent to using medicalized contraceptive methods.</p></div><div><h3><strong>Implications</strong></h3><p>Findings from this study can help improve reproductive health programs by addressing concerns about contraception to help women achieve their reproductive goals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10655,"journal":{"name":"Contraception: X","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100093"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10127128/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10101606","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Knowledge, attitude, and intended practice of abortion among medical students in Thailand after the amendment of the Thai abortion law 泰国堕胎法修订后,泰国医学生对堕胎的知识、态度和预期做法
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.conx.2023.100091
Rada Poolkumlung , Ratthapong Rongkapich , Natchanika Sinthuchai , Somsook Santibenchakul , Vorachart Meevasana , Unnop Jaisamrarn

Objectives

Following the amendment of the Thai abortion law in February 2021, the authors conducted an anonymous survey to assess knowledge, attitude, and intended practice toward abortion among fifth-year medical students at Chulalongkorn University.

Study design

The authors developed a self-administrated questionnaire consisting of three parts: knowledge of the recently amended Thai abortion law, attitude toward abortion, and intended practices. Pilot testing showed a high Cronbach's alpha and test-retest reliability coefficient.

Results

Of the 292 surveyed medical students, 70% completed the questionnaire. The mean ± standard deviation of the knowledge part was 6.9 ± 1.8, of which the maximum score was 10. Nearly half of the participants (45.6%) answered at least 80% of the knowledge statements correctly. Sixty-four percent of participants answered correctly on the gestational limit for first-trimester abortion. Around one-third of participants answered correctly on the gestational limit for second-trimester abortion. Most participants (86.8%) agreed that abortion is a woman’s right. The most acceptable conditions for abortion were pregnancy as a result of rape (93%) and serious anomalies that cause a nonviable neonate (95.6%).

Conclusions

Participants exhibited a lack of understanding regarding the legal gestational limit, which is a key aspect of the amendment. The findings of this study urge medical schools to emphasize the revised Thai abortion law in the Obstetrics and Gynecology curriculum.

Implications

Our results show that encouraging medical students to have up-to-date knowledge regarding the amendment of Thai abortion law may support their future decision to provide safe abortion services.

目的在2021年2月泰国堕胎法修订后,作者进行了一项匿名调查,评估朱拉隆功大学五年级医学生对堕胎的知识、态度和预期做法。研究设计作者编制了一份自我管理的问卷,由三部分组成:对最近修订的泰国堕胎法的了解、对堕胎的态度和预期做法。初步测试显示出较高的Cronbachα和重新测试的可靠性系数。结果在292名医学生中,70%的学生完成了问卷调查。知识部分的平均值±标准差为6.9±1.8,其中最高分为10分。近一半的参与者(45.6%)至少正确回答了80%的知识陈述。64%的参与者对妊娠早期流产的妊娠限制回答正确。大约三分之一的参与者对妊娠中期堕胎的妊娠限制回答正确。大多数参与者(86.8%)同意堕胎是妇女的权利。最可接受的堕胎条件是强奸导致的妊娠(93%)和导致新生儿无法存活的严重异常(95.6%)。结论参与者对法律妊娠期限制缺乏了解,这是修正案的一个关键方面。这项研究的结果促使医学院在妇产科课程中强调修改后的泰国堕胎法。含义我们的研究结果表明,鼓励医学生掌握有关泰国堕胎法修正案的最新知识,可能会支持他们未来提供安全堕胎服务的决定。
{"title":"Knowledge, attitude, and intended practice of abortion among medical students in Thailand after the amendment of the Thai abortion law","authors":"Rada Poolkumlung ,&nbsp;Ratthapong Rongkapich ,&nbsp;Natchanika Sinthuchai ,&nbsp;Somsook Santibenchakul ,&nbsp;Vorachart Meevasana ,&nbsp;Unnop Jaisamrarn","doi":"10.1016/j.conx.2023.100091","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.conx.2023.100091","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Following the amendment of the Thai abortion law in February 2021, the authors conducted an anonymous survey to assess knowledge, attitude, and intended practice toward abortion among fifth-year medical students at Chulalongkorn University.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>The authors developed a self-administrated questionnaire consisting of three parts: knowledge of the recently amended Thai abortion law, attitude toward abortion, and intended practices. Pilot testing showed a high Cronbach's alpha and test-retest reliability coefficient.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 292 surveyed medical students, 70% completed the questionnaire. The mean ± standard deviation of the knowledge part was 6.9 ± 1.8, of which the maximum score was 10. Nearly half of the participants (45.6%) answered at least 80% of the knowledge statements correctly. Sixty-four percent of participants answered correctly on the gestational limit for first-trimester abortion. Around one-third of participants answered correctly on the gestational limit for second-trimester abortion. Most participants (86.8%) agreed that abortion is a woman’s right. The most acceptable conditions for abortion were pregnancy as a result of rape (93%) and serious anomalies that cause a nonviable neonate (95.6%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Participants exhibited a lack of understanding regarding the legal gestational limit, which is a key aspect of the amendment. The findings of this study urge medical schools to emphasize the revised Thai abortion law in the Obstetrics and Gynecology curriculum.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>Our results show that encouraging medical students to have up-to-date knowledge regarding the amendment of Thai abortion law may support their future decision to provide safe abortion services.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10655,"journal":{"name":"Contraception: X","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100091"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/21/f1/main.PMC10140783.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9386584","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluation of the LMUP in Ethiopia: Requirements, challenges and best practice 埃塞俄比亚LMUP评估:要求、挑战和最佳实践
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.conx.2023.100097
Geraldine Barrett, Ana Luiza Vilela Borges, Justine N. Bukenya, Ararso Baru Olani, Jennifer A. Hall
{"title":"Evaluation of the LMUP in Ethiopia: Requirements, challenges and best practice","authors":"Geraldine Barrett,&nbsp;Ana Luiza Vilela Borges,&nbsp;Justine N. Bukenya,&nbsp;Ararso Baru Olani,&nbsp;Jennifer A. Hall","doi":"10.1016/j.conx.2023.100097","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.conx.2023.100097","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10655,"journal":{"name":"Contraception: X","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100097"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/cf/72/main.PMC10474351.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10524072","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Differential discontinuation by covert use status in Kenya 肯尼亚因秘密使用状况而区别停用。
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.conx.2023.100102
Dana Sarnak , Shannon N. Wood , Phil Anglewicz , Elizabeth Gummerson , Peter Gichangi , Mary Thiongo , Caroline Moreau

Objectives

Qualitative research suggests that covert users may be more likely to discontinue contraception due to the logistics of discretion and fear of disclosure. This study sought to quantify whether covert users are more likely to discontinue contraception than overt users.

Study design

We used a national longitudinal survey from Kenya conducted from November 2019/February 2020 to November 2020/April 2021 to test whether the time to discontinuation between covert and overt users still in need of contraception differed using survival analyses over a period of 5 years since method initiation.

Results

Multivariate Cox regression results showed there was an interaction with time and covert use on the risk of discontinuation; for every additional month of use, there was an increased risk of discontinuation of covert users compared to overt users (3% increased hazard, p = 0.02). At 1 and 2 years, there were no differences in the hazard of discontinuation (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]1 year 0.95, 95% CI 0.54–1.65 and aHR2 years 1.37, 95% CI 0.85–2.21), yet at 3, 4, and 5 years, the hazard of discontinuation was higher for covert compared to overt users (aHR3 years 1.99, 95% 1.11–3.56; aHR4 years 2.89, 95% CI 2.0–6.40; aHR5 years 4.18, 95% CI 1.45–12.0).

Conclusions

These results suggest efforts are needed to support covert users in managing their contraceptive use and for improving contraceptive counseling surrounding covert use. Our findings shed light on the increasing challenge covert users face after approximately the first 2 years of use; covert users require additional follow-up in both research and care provision.

Implications

Covert users are at a higher risk of discontinuation of contraception while still trying to avoid pregnancy, particularly after the first 2 years of use. Family planning providers and programs must protect access to and maintain the privacy of reproductive services to this population, focusing on follow-up care provision and counseling.

目的:定性研究表明,由于谨慎和害怕披露,秘密使用者可能更有可能停止避孕。这项研究试图量化隐蔽使用者是否比公开使用者更有可能停止避孕。研究设计:我们使用了2019年11月/2020年2月至2020年11月-2021年4月在肯尼亚进行的一项全国纵向调查,通过自方法启动以来5年的生存分析,测试仍需要避孕的隐蔽使用者和公开使用者之间的停药时间是否不同。结果:多因素Cox回归结果显示,停药风险与时间和隐蔽使用有关;与显性使用者相比,每多使用一个月,隐性使用者停用的风险就会增加(危险增加3%,p=0.02)。在1年和2年时,停用的危险没有差异(调整后的危险比[aHR]1年0.95,95%CI 0.54-1.65和aHR2年1.37,95%CI 0.85-2.21),但在3年、4年和5年时,与显性使用者相比,隐性使用者的停药风险更高(aHR3岁1.99,95%1.11-3.56;aHR4岁2.89,95%CI 2.0-6.40;aHR5岁4.18,95%CI 1.45-12.0)。结论:这些结果表明,需要努力支持隐性使用者管理其避孕药具的使用,并改善围绕隐性使用的避孕咨询。我们的发现揭示了秘密用户在使用大约前2年后面临的越来越大的挑战;隐蔽使用者需要在研究和护理方面采取额外的后续行动。影响:隐蔽使用者在试图避免怀孕的同时,终止避孕的风险更高,尤其是在使用前2年之后。计划生育提供者和方案必须保护这一人群获得生殖服务的机会并维护其隐私,重点是后续护理和咨询。
{"title":"Differential discontinuation by covert use status in Kenya","authors":"Dana Sarnak ,&nbsp;Shannon N. Wood ,&nbsp;Phil Anglewicz ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Gummerson ,&nbsp;Peter Gichangi ,&nbsp;Mary Thiongo ,&nbsp;Caroline Moreau","doi":"10.1016/j.conx.2023.100102","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.conx.2023.100102","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Qualitative research suggests that covert users may be more likely to discontinue contraception due to the logistics of discretion and fear of disclosure. This study sought to quantify whether covert users are more likely to discontinue contraception than overt users.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>We used a national longitudinal survey from Kenya conducted from November 2019/February 2020 to November 2020/April 2021 to test whether the time to discontinuation between covert and overt users still in need of contraception differed using survival analyses over a period of 5 years since method initiation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Multivariate Cox regression results showed there was an interaction with time and covert use on the risk of discontinuation; for every additional month of use, there was an increased risk of discontinuation of covert users compared to overt users (3% increased hazard, <em>p</em> = 0.02). At 1 and 2 years, there were no differences in the hazard of discontinuation (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]<sub>1 year</sub> 0.95, 95% CI 0.54–1.65 and aHR<sub>2 years</sub> 1.37, 95% CI 0.85–2.21), yet at 3, 4, and 5 years, the hazard of discontinuation was higher for covert compared to overt users (aHR<sub>3 years</sub> 1.99, 95% 1.11–3.56; aHR<sub>4 years</sub> 2.89, 95% CI 2.0–6.40; aHR<sub>5 years</sub> 4.18, 95% CI 1.45–12.0).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These results suggest efforts are needed to support covert users in managing their contraceptive use and for improving contraceptive counseling surrounding covert use. Our findings shed light on the increasing challenge covert users face after approximately the first 2 years of use; covert users require additional follow-up in both research and care provision.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>Covert users are at a higher risk of discontinuation of contraception while still trying to avoid pregnancy, particularly after the first 2 years of use. Family planning providers and programs must protect access to and maintain the privacy of reproductive services to this population, focusing on follow-up care provision and counseling.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10655,"journal":{"name":"Contraception: X","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10625140/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71479001","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Concern that contraception affects future fertility: How common is this concern among young people and does it stop them from using contraception? 对避孕影响未来生育的担忧:这种担忧在年轻人中的普遍程度如何?
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.conx.2023.100103
Annalisa Watson , Jennifer Yarger , Erica Sedlander , Josephine Urbina , Kristine Hopkins , Maria I. Rodriguez , Liza Fuentes , Cynthia C. Harper

Objectives

This study examines the concern that contraception affects future fertility among community college students and its association with contraceptive use.

Study design

We used baseline data from a randomized controlled trial with 2060 community college students assigned female at birth. We used mixed-effects multivariate logistic regression adjusted for clustered data to assess sociodemographic factors associated with concerns about contraception affecting future fertility and to test the association between this concern and contraceptive use.

Results

Most participants (69%) worried about contraception affecting their future fertility. Multivariable results indicated that first-generation college students (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01–1.55) and non-English speakers at home (aOR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.04–1.64) were more concerned. Racial and ethnic differences were significant, with Black non-Hispanic (aOR, 2.83; 95% CI, 1.70–4.70), Asian/Pacific Islander non-Hispanic (aOR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.43–3.14), and Hispanic (aOR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.17–2.02) participants more likely to be concerned than White non-Hispanic counterparts. Participants who received contraceptive services in the past year had lower odds of this concern (aOR, 0.72; 95% CI 0.59–0.88). Furthermore, participants with this concern had lower odds of using contraception (aOR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.49–0.91), especially hormonal contraception (aOR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.61–0.97).

Conclusions

Most students feared contraception’s impact on fertility, and this fear was associated with not using contraception. Disparities in this concern may be tied to discrimination, reproductive coercion, and limited reproductive health care access. Addressing concerns about contraception affecting future fertility is crucial to person-centered contraceptive counseling.

Implications

This study examines the concern that contraception affects future fertility among sexually active female community college students and its impact on contraceptive use. Most participants expressed concerns about contraception affecting future fertility. Addressing future fertility concerns in patient-centered contraceptive counseling is crucial for reaching young people.

本研究探讨了社区大学生对避孕影响未来生育的担忧及其与避孕药具使用之间的关系。研究设计我们使用了一项随机对照试验的基线数据,其中有 2060 名社区大学生在出生时被分配为女性。我们使用混合效应多变量逻辑回归对聚类数据进行调整,以评估与担心避孕影响未来生育相关的社会人口学因素,并检验这种担心与避孕药具使用之间的关联。多变量结果显示,第一代大学生(调整赔率[aOR],1.24;95% 置信区间[CI],1.01-1.55)和家中不讲英语者(aOR,1.30;95% 置信区间[CI],1.04-1.64)更担心。种族和民族差异显著,非西班牙裔黑人(aOR,2.83;95% CI,1.70-4.70)、非西班牙裔亚裔/太平洋岛民(aOR,2.12;95% CI,1.43-3.14)和西班牙裔参与者(aOR,1.54;95% CI,1.17-2.02)比非西班牙裔白人更有可能感到担忧。在过去一年中接受过避孕服务的参与者出现这种担忧的几率较低(aOR,0.72;95% CI,0.59-0.88)。此外,有这种担忧的参与者使用避孕药具的几率较低(aOR,0.67;95% CI,0.49-0.91),尤其是激素避孕药具(aOR,0.77;95% CI,0.61-0.97)。这种担忧的差异可能与歧视、生殖胁迫和有限的生殖保健服务有关。本研究探讨了性活跃的社区女大学生对避孕影响未来生育的担忧及其对避孕药具使用的影响。大多数参与者表达了对避孕影响未来生育的担忧。在以患者为中心的避孕咨询中解决对未来生育的担忧对于帮助年轻人至关重要。
{"title":"Concern that contraception affects future fertility: How common is this concern among young people and does it stop them from using contraception?","authors":"Annalisa Watson ,&nbsp;Jennifer Yarger ,&nbsp;Erica Sedlander ,&nbsp;Josephine Urbina ,&nbsp;Kristine Hopkins ,&nbsp;Maria I. Rodriguez ,&nbsp;Liza Fuentes ,&nbsp;Cynthia C. Harper","doi":"10.1016/j.conx.2023.100103","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conx.2023.100103","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study examines the concern that contraception affects future fertility among community college students and its association with contraceptive use.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>We used baseline data from a randomized controlled trial with 2060 community college students assigned female at birth. We used mixed-effects multivariate logistic regression adjusted for clustered data to assess sociodemographic factors associated with concerns about contraception affecting future fertility and to test the association between this concern and contraceptive use.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Most participants (69%) worried about contraception affecting their future fertility. Multivariable results indicated that first-generation college students (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01–1.55) and non-English speakers at home (aOR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.04–1.64) were more concerned. Racial and ethnic differences were significant, with Black non-Hispanic (aOR, 2.83; 95% CI, 1.70–4.70), Asian/Pacific Islander non-Hispanic (aOR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.43–3.14), and Hispanic (aOR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.17–2.02) participants more likely to be concerned than White non-Hispanic counterparts. Participants who received contraceptive services in the past year had lower odds of this concern (aOR, 0.72; 95% CI 0.59–0.88). Furthermore, participants with this concern had lower odds of using contraception (aOR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.49–0.91), especially hormonal contraception (aOR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.61–0.97).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Most students feared contraception’s impact on fertility, and this fear was associated with not using contraception. Disparities in this concern may be tied to discrimination, reproductive coercion, and limited reproductive health care access. Addressing concerns about contraception affecting future fertility is crucial to person-centered contraceptive counseling.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>This study examines the concern that contraception affects future fertility among sexually active female community college students and its impact on contraceptive use. Most participants expressed concerns about contraception affecting future fertility. Addressing future fertility concerns in patient-centered contraceptive counseling is crucial for reaching young people.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10655,"journal":{"name":"Contraception: X","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151623000151/pdfft?md5=9b639ec669fbc370ff1a611e5221937a&pid=1-s2.0-S2590151623000151-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138557550","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Contraception: X
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1