To assess preferences for female condom (FC) colors and scents.
Study design
Women aged 18–40 years were randomized to one of three FCs (FC2, Cupid1, Cupid2) two of which offered a choice of color and scent (red/strawberry, purple/vanilla, natural/unscented). Women could choose any variety within condom types while participating in an FC contraceptive efficacy study in South Africa.
Results
One hundred and thirty-three women were allocated to each FC type. Strawberry was the most popular variety for both FC2 and Cupid1 (60.9%, 78.3% respectively). Some women chose more than one variety but few chose the natural.
Conclusions
Data support a clear preference for colored and scented FCs.
Implications
These data can inform FC programme managers to predict demand for different varieties of FC and can adjust supply of FCs accordingly.
{"title":"Female condom color and scent preference in Durban, South Africa","authors":"Mags Beksinska , Jenni Smit , Amanda Mona , Virginia Maphumulo , Nonhlanhla Mphili , Nontsikelelo Manzini-Matebula , Thato Chidarikire","doi":"10.1016/j.conx.2023.100095","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.conx.2023.100095","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To assess preferences for female condom (FC) colors and scents.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Women aged 18–40 years were randomized to one of three FCs (FC2, Cupid1, Cupid2) two of which offered a choice of color and scent (red/strawberry, purple/vanilla, natural/unscented). Women could choose any variety within condom types while participating in an FC contraceptive efficacy study in South Africa.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>One hundred and thirty-three women were allocated to each FC type. Strawberry was the most popular variety for both FC2 and Cupid1 (60.9%, 78.3% respectively). Some women chose more than one variety but few chose the natural.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Data support a clear preference for colored and scented FCs.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>These data can inform FC programme managers to predict demand for different varieties of FC and can adjust supply of FCs accordingly.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10655,"journal":{"name":"Contraception: X","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100095"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/27/b5/main.PMC10404533.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9968168","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.conx.2022.100088
Brooke W. Bullington , Katherine Tumlinson , Celia Karp , Leigh Senderowicz , Linnea Zimmerman , Pierre Z. Akilimali , Musa Sani Zakirai , Funmilola M. OlaOlorun , Simon P.S. Kibira , Frederick Edward Makumbi , Solomon Shiferaw , PMA Principal Investigators Group
Objective
There has been a growing focus on informed choice in contraceptive research. Because removal of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), including implants and IUDs, requires a trained provider, ensuring informed choice in the adoption of these methods is imperative. We sought to understand whether information received during contraceptive counseling differed among women using LARC and those using other modern methods of contraception.
Study Design
We used cross-sectional data from Burkina Faso, Côte d'Ivoire, the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Kenya, Nigeria, and Uganda collected in 2019–2020 by the Performance Monitoring for Action project. We included 7969 reproductive-aged women who reported use of modern contraception. Our outcome of interest, information received during contraceptive counseling, was measured using a binary indicator of whether respondents answered “yes” to all 4 questions that make up the Method Information Index Plus (MII+). We used modified Poisson models to estimate the prevalence ratio between method type (LARC vs. other modern methods) and the MII+, controlling for individual- and facility-level covariates.
Results
Reported receipt of the full MII+ during contraceptive counseling ranged from 21% in the DRC to 51% in Kenya. In all countries, a higher proportion of LARC users received the MII+ compared to other modern method users. A greater proportion of LARC users answered “yes” to all questions that make up the MII+ at the time of counseling compared to other modern method users in DRC, Kenya, Nigeria, and Uganda. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of reporting the full MII+ between users of LARC and other modern methods in Burkina Faso (Adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR): 1.16; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.91, 1.48) and Côte d'Ivoire (aPR: 1.13; 95% CI: 0.87, 1.45).
Conclusion
Information received during contraceptive counseling was limited for all modern contraceptive users. LARC users had significantly higher prevalence of receiving the MII+ compared to other modern method users in the DRC, Kenya, and Uganda. Family planning programs should ensure that all women receive complete, unbiased contraceptive counseling.
Implications
Across 6 sub-Saharan African countries, a substantial proportion reproductive-aged women using contraception did not report receiving comprehensive counseling when they received their method. Women using long-acting reversible contraception received more information compared to women using other modern methods in the DRC, Kenya, Nigeria, and Uganda after controlling for individual- and facility-level factors.
{"title":"Do users of long-acting reversible contraceptives receive the same counseling content as other modern method users? A cross-sectional, multi-country analysis of women's experiences with the Method Information Index in six sub-Saharan African countries","authors":"Brooke W. Bullington , Katherine Tumlinson , Celia Karp , Leigh Senderowicz , Linnea Zimmerman , Pierre Z. Akilimali , Musa Sani Zakirai , Funmilola M. OlaOlorun , Simon P.S. Kibira , Frederick Edward Makumbi , Solomon Shiferaw , PMA Principal Investigators Group","doi":"10.1016/j.conx.2022.100088","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.conx.2022.100088","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>There has been a growing focus on informed choice in contraceptive research. Because removal of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), including implants and IUDs, requires a trained provider, ensuring informed choice in the adoption of these methods is imperative. We sought to understand whether information received during contraceptive counseling differed among women using LARC and those using other modern methods of contraception.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><p>We used cross-sectional data from Burkina Faso, Côte d'Ivoire, the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Kenya, Nigeria, and Uganda collected in 2019–2020 by the Performance Monitoring for Action project. We included 7969 reproductive-aged women who reported use of modern contraception. Our outcome of interest, information received during contraceptive counseling, was measured using a binary indicator of whether respondents answered “yes” to all 4 questions that make up the Method Information Index Plus (MII+). We used modified Poisson models to estimate the prevalence ratio between method type (LARC vs. other modern methods) and the MII+, controlling for individual- and facility-level covariates.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Reported receipt of the full MII+ during contraceptive counseling ranged from 21% in the DRC to 51% in Kenya. In all countries, a higher proportion of LARC users received the MII+ compared to other modern method users. A greater proportion of LARC users answered “yes” to all questions that make up the MII+ at the time of counseling compared to other modern method users in DRC, Kenya, Nigeria, and Uganda. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of reporting the full MII+ between users of LARC and other modern methods in Burkina Faso (Adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR): 1.16; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.91, 1.48) and Côte d'Ivoire (aPR: 1.13; 95% CI: 0.87, 1.45).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Information received during contraceptive counseling was limited for all modern contraceptive users. LARC users had significantly higher prevalence of receiving the MII+ compared to other modern method users in the DRC, Kenya, and Uganda. Family planning programs should ensure that all women receive complete, unbiased contraceptive counseling.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>Across 6 sub-Saharan African countries, a substantial proportion reproductive-aged women using contraception did not report receiving comprehensive counseling when they received their method. Women using long-acting reversible contraception received more information compared to women using other modern methods in the DRC, Kenya, Nigeria, and Uganda after controlling for individual- and facility-level factors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10655,"journal":{"name":"Contraception: X","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100088"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9676194/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10324424","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.conx.2022.100081
Kate Welti, Jennifer Manlove, Jane Finocharo, Bianca Faccio, Lisa Kim
Objective
Person-centered contraceptive care is associated with positive reproductive health outcomes. Our objective was to analyze patients’ ratings on the newly developed Person-Centered Contraceptive Counseling scale (PCCC) to provide distributions for a nationally representative population and to assess differences by sociodemographic characteristics.
Study design
Using data from 2017 to 2019 National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG), we analyzed ratings across the four PCCC items among 2242 women who received contraceptive counseling in the past year. Items measured patients’ reports of how providers respected them, let them describe their contraceptive preferences, took their preferences seriously, and adequately informed them about their options. We studied each PCCC item individually as well as the combined scale, distinguishing between ratings of “excellent” versus lower ratings. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression models assessed how patients’ characteristics (age, race/ethnicity and English proficiency, sexual orientation, income, and parity) and provider type were associated with the likelihood of experiencing person-centered care.
Results
The majority of women (59%–69%) reported that their family planning provider was “excellent” across the four PCCC items and just over half (51%) reported “excellent” on all items. In multivariate analyses, having a lower income, Black race, non-heterosexual identity, and Hispanic ethnicity combined with low English proficiency were associated with lower PCCC ratings.
Conclusions
In a nationally representative sample, the PCCC captured variation in women's experiences with person-centered family planning care by sociodemographic characteristics. Findings highlight the need for contraceptive counseling that centers on clients’ preferences and experiences, particularly for patients who belong to groups experiencing health inequities.
Implications
Person-centered care is a key component of high-quality family planning services. This analysis highlights sociodemographic disparities in person-centered care by analyzing PCCC ratings. Findings show the value of this new health care performance measure and affirm the need for family planning care that centers individuals' preferences and lived experiences.
{"title":"Women's experiences with person-centered family planning care: Differences by sociodemographic characteristics","authors":"Kate Welti, Jennifer Manlove, Jane Finocharo, Bianca Faccio, Lisa Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.conx.2022.100081","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.conx.2022.100081","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Person-centered contraceptive care is associated with positive reproductive health outcomes. Our objective was to analyze patients’ ratings on the newly developed Person-Centered Contraceptive Counseling scale (PCCC) to provide distributions for a nationally representative population and to assess differences by sociodemographic characteristics.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Using data from 2017 to 2019 National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG), we analyzed ratings across the four PCCC items among 2242 women who received contraceptive counseling in the past year. Items measured patients’ reports of how providers respected them, let them describe their contraceptive preferences, took their preferences seriously, and adequately informed them about their options. We studied each PCCC item individually as well as the combined scale, distinguishing between ratings of “excellent” versus lower ratings. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression models assessed how patients’ characteristics (age, race/ethnicity and English proficiency, sexual orientation, income, and parity) and provider type were associated with the likelihood of experiencing person-centered care.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The majority of women (59%–69%) reported that their family planning provider was “excellent” across the four PCCC items and just over half (51%) reported “excellent” on all items. In multivariate analyses, having a lower income, Black race, non-heterosexual identity, and Hispanic ethnicity combined with low English proficiency were associated with lower PCCC ratings.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In a nationally representative sample, the PCCC captured variation in women's experiences with person-centered family planning care by sociodemographic characteristics. Findings highlight the need for contraceptive counseling that centers on clients’ preferences and experiences, particularly for patients who belong to groups experiencing health inequities.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>Person-centered care is a key component of high-quality family planning services. This analysis highlights sociodemographic disparities in person-centered care by analyzing PCCC ratings. Findings show the value of this new health care performance measure and affirm the need for family planning care that centers individuals' preferences and lived experiences.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10655,"journal":{"name":"Contraception: X","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100081"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/52/80/main.PMC9372601.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40696424","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.conx.2022.100072
Joshua Brown , Tamra Goodrow , Dan Hartman , Justin L. Hay , Kevin Hershberger , Susan Hershenson , Douglas McNair , Bethany Matthews , Mark A. Milad , Stephan Schmidt , Kirsten M Vogelsong , Ping Zhao
Developing new long-acting products of well-characterized contraceptive drugs is one way to address some of the reasons for unmet need for modern methods of family planning among women in low- and middle-income countries. Development and approval of such products traditionally follow a conventional paradigm that includes large Phase 3 clinical trials to evaluate efficacy (pregnancy prevention) and safety of the investigational product. Exposure-bracketing is a concept that applies known pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a drug substance to inform its safe and efficacious use in humans. Several therapeutic areas have applied this concept by leveraging established drug concentration-response relationships for approved products to expedite development and shorten the timeline for the approval of an investigational product containing the same drug substance. Based on discussions at a workshop hosted by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in December 2020, it appears feasible to apply exposure-bracketing to develop novel contraceptive products using well-characterized drugs.
{"title":"Application of exposure bracketing to streamline the development of contraceptive products","authors":"Joshua Brown , Tamra Goodrow , Dan Hartman , Justin L. Hay , Kevin Hershberger , Susan Hershenson , Douglas McNair , Bethany Matthews , Mark A. Milad , Stephan Schmidt , Kirsten M Vogelsong , Ping Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.conx.2022.100072","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.conx.2022.100072","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Developing new long-acting products of well-characterized contraceptive drugs is one way to address some of the reasons for unmet need for modern methods of family planning among women in low- and middle-income countries. Development and approval of such products traditionally follow a conventional paradigm that includes large Phase 3 clinical trials to evaluate efficacy (pregnancy prevention) and safety of the investigational product. Exposure-bracketing is a concept that applies known pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a drug substance to inform its safe and efficacious use in humans. Several therapeutic areas have applied this concept by leveraging established drug concentration-response relationships for approved products to expedite development and shorten the timeline for the approval of an investigational product containing the same drug substance. Based on discussions at a workshop hosted by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in December 2020, it appears feasible to apply exposure-bracketing to develop novel contraceptive products using well-characterized drugs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10655,"journal":{"name":"Contraception: X","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100072"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151622000016/pdfft?md5=15f629b087d4947747c8ef99c9336ca6&pid=1-s2.0-S2590151622000016-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45555984","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.conx.2022.100085
Abraham Fessehaye Sium , Sarah Prager , Mekdes Wolderufael , Ferid A. Abubeker , Tesfaye H. Tufa , Jaclyn M. Grentzer
Objective
To document the use of Foley catheter as an alternative to osmotic dilators for cervical preparation before second trimester dilation and evacuation at a tertiary setting in Ethiopia
Methods
This is a retrospective case series conducted at St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College (Ethiopia) from April 1, 2021 to August 30, 2021. Forty-three cases of dilation and evacuation (D&E) in which overnight intra-cervical Foley catheter placement was used to prepare the cervix were reviewed. Data were analysed using SPSS version 23 and simple descriptive statistics were applied to analyze the clinical characteristics of study subjects and procedure outcomes. Percentages and frequencies were used to present the findings.
Results
The calculated median gestational age was 21.4(17–24.2) weeks. Around 40%(17/43) of cases had cervical dilation of 3 to 4 cm, with another 33% (14/43) achieving cervical dilation of 1.5 to 2.5 cm. Additional dilation during the procedure was required only in 12 cases (28%) prior to D&E procedure. In 36 cases (84%), the procedure was attended by family planning fellow.
Conclusion
Cervical preparation using overnight Foley catheter before second-trimester D&E resulted in majority of the cases requiring no additional dilation immediately prior to D&E procedure. Where osmotic dilators are not available, Foley catheter can be an alternative method to prepare the cervix prior to D&E procedures.
Implications
In the absence of osmotic dilators, Foley catheter can be used as an alternate, and readily available means of cervical preparation for second trimester D&E procedures
目的记录在埃塞俄比亚第三医院使用Foley导管替代渗透性扩张器进行妊娠中期扩张和排出前的宫颈准备。方法:这是一个回顾性的病例系列,于2021年4月1日至2021年8月30日在圣保罗医院千禧医学院(埃塞俄比亚)进行。本文回顾了43例宫颈扩张和引流术(D&E),其中使用过夜宫颈内Foley导管放置以准备宫颈。数据分析采用SPSS version 23,采用简单描述性统计分析研究对象的临床特征和手术结果。使用百分比和频率来呈现研究结果。结果计算的中位胎龄为21.4(17 ~ 24.2)周。约40%(17/43)的病例宫颈扩张3 ~ 4cm,另有33%(14/43)的病例宫颈扩张1.5 ~ 2.5 cm。只有12例(28%)在D&手术前需要在手术过程中进行额外扩张。36例(84%)由计划生育人员参与。结论在妊娠中期D&E术前使用过夜Foley导管进行宫颈准备,大多数病例不需要在D&E手术前立即进行额外的扩张。在没有渗透扩张器的情况下,Foley导管可以是在D&手术前准备子宫颈的替代方法。在没有渗透扩张器的情况下,Foley导管可以作为妊娠中期d&e手术的一种替代的、容易获得的宫颈准备手段
{"title":"Foley catheter for cervical preparation prior to second trimester dilation and evacuation: A supply-based alternative for surgical abortion: A case series","authors":"Abraham Fessehaye Sium , Sarah Prager , Mekdes Wolderufael , Ferid A. Abubeker , Tesfaye H. Tufa , Jaclyn M. Grentzer","doi":"10.1016/j.conx.2022.100085","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.conx.2022.100085","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To document the use of Foley catheter as an alternative to osmotic dilators for cervical preparation before second trimester dilation and evacuation at a tertiary setting in Ethiopia</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This is a retrospective case series conducted at St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College (Ethiopia) from April 1, 2021 to August 30, 2021. Forty-three cases of dilation and evacuation (D&E) in which overnight intra-cervical Foley catheter placement was used to prepare the cervix were reviewed. Data were analysed using SPSS version 23 and simple descriptive statistics were applied to analyze the clinical characteristics of study subjects and procedure outcomes. Percentages and frequencies were used to present the findings.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The calculated median gestational age was 21.4(17–24.2) weeks. Around 40%(17/43) of cases had cervical dilation of 3 to 4 cm, with another 33% (14/43) achieving cervical dilation of 1.5 to 2.5 cm. Additional dilation during the procedure was required only in 12 cases (28%) prior to D&E procedure. In 36 cases (84%), the procedure was attended by family planning fellow.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Cervical preparation using overnight Foley catheter before second-trimester D&E resulted in majority of the cases requiring no additional dilation immediately prior to D&E procedure. Where osmotic dilators are not available, Foley catheter can be an alternative method to prepare the cervix prior to D&E procedures.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>In the absence of osmotic dilators, Foley catheter can be used as an alternate, and readily available means of cervical preparation for second trimester D&E procedures</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10655,"journal":{"name":"Contraception: X","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100085"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9593172/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40433226","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.conx.2022.100078
Lee A. Hasselbacher , Erin Wingo , Alexis Cacioppo , Ashley McHugh , Debra Stulberg , Lori Freedman
The majority of United States (US) women age 15–49 have employer-sponsored health insurance, but these insurance plans fall short if employees cannot find providers who meet reproductive health needs. Employers could and should do more to facilitate and advocate for their employees through the insurance plans they sponsor. We conducted interviews with 14 key informants to understand how large United States employers see their role in health insurance benefits, especially when it comes to reproductive health care access and restrictions in religious health systems. Our findings suggest that large employers wish to be responsive to their employees’ health insurance priorities and have leverage to improve access to reproductive health services, but they do not take sufficient action toward this end. In particular, we argue that large employers could pressure insurance carriers to address network gaps in care resulting from religious restrictions and require insurers to treat out-of-network providers like in-network providers when reproductive care is restricted.
{"title":"Beyond Hobby Lobby: Employer's responsibilities and opportunities to improve network access to reproductive healthcare for employees","authors":"Lee A. Hasselbacher , Erin Wingo , Alexis Cacioppo , Ashley McHugh , Debra Stulberg , Lori Freedman","doi":"10.1016/j.conx.2022.100078","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conx.2022.100078","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The majority of United States (US) women age 15–49 have employer-sponsored health insurance, but these insurance plans fall short if employees cannot find providers who meet reproductive health needs. Employers could and should do more to facilitate and advocate for their employees through the insurance plans they sponsor. We conducted interviews with 14 key informants to understand how large United States employers see their role in health insurance benefits, especially when it comes to reproductive health care access and restrictions in religious health systems. Our findings suggest that large employers wish to be responsive to their employees’ health insurance priorities and have leverage to improve access to reproductive health services, but they do not take sufficient action toward this end. In particular, we argue that large employers could pressure insurance carriers to address network gaps in care resulting from religious restrictions and require insurers to treat out-of-network providers like in-network providers when reproductive care is restricted.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10655,"journal":{"name":"Contraception: X","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100078"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151622000077/pdfft?md5=18c0a7ac01de30f5a3b15d6ad66b918a&pid=1-s2.0-S2590151622000077-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90017062","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.conx.2022.100076
Megan L. Kavanaugh, Emma Pliskin, Rubina Hussain
Objective
To identify prevalence of unfulfilled contraceptive preferences due to cost among low-income United States female contraceptive method users and nonusers, and associations between access to, and experience with, contraceptive care and this outcome.
Methods
We drew on data from the 2015–2019 National Surveys of Family Growth to conduct simple and multivariable logistic regression analyses on unfulfilled contraceptive preferences due to cost among nationally representative samples of low-income women ages 15 to 49 who were current contraceptive users (N = 3178) and nonusers (N = 1073).
Results
Overall, 23% of female contraceptive users reported they would use a different method, and 39% of nonusers reported they would start using a method, if cost were not an issue. Controlling for user characteristics, low-income contraceptive users who received recent publicly supported contraceptive care reported significantly higher levels of unfulfilled contraceptive preferences due to cost than those without any access to SRH care (aOR = 1.6, CI 1.0–2.5), while having private (aOR = 0.6, CI 0.4–0.9) or public (aOR = 0.7, CI 0.5–1.0) health insurance was associated with significantly lower levels of this outcome. Nonusers of contraception who had recently received publicly supported contraceptive care also reported marginally higher levels of this outcome (aOR = 2.2, CI 1.0–5.1). Contraceptive users who received recent person-centered contraceptive counseling had marginally lower odds of unfulfilled contraceptive preferences due to cost (aOR = 0.6, CI 0.4–1.0).
Conclusions
Cost is a barrier to using preferred contraception for both contraceptive users and nonusers; health insurance coverage and person-centered contraceptive counseling may help contraceptive users to overcome cost barriers and realize their contraceptive preferences.
Implications
Factors related to contraceptive access at the systems level—specifically the subsidization and experience of contraceptive care—impact whether cost serves as a barrier to individuals’ contraceptive preferences. Delivery of patient-centered care and shoring up health insurance coverage for all can help to mitigate cost barriers and enable individuals to realize their contraceptive preferences.
目的确定美国低收入女性避孕方法使用者和非使用者中由于成本原因而未实现避孕偏好的流行程度,以及避孕护理的可及性和经历与这一结果之间的关系。方法利用2015-2019年全国家庭增长调查的数据,对全国代表性样本中15至49岁的低收入妇女(N = 3178)和非避孕药使用者(N = 1073)的未实现避孕偏好进行简单和多变量logistic回归分析。结果总体而言,23%的女性避孕药使用者报告说她们会使用不同的方法,39%的非使用者报告说如果费用不是问题,她们会开始使用一种方法。在控制了用户特征后,近期接受公共支持的避孕服务的低收入避孕使用者报告的由于成本原因导致的未实现避孕偏好水平明显高于没有获得任何性健康生殖健康服务的低收入避孕使用者(aOR = 1.6, CI 1.0-2.5),而拥有私人(aOR = 0.6, CI 0.4-0.9)或公共(aOR = 0.7, CI 0.5-1.0)健康保险的低收入避孕使用者报告的未实现避孕偏好水平显著低于没有获得任何性健康生殖健康服务的低收入避孕使用者。最近接受公共支持的避孕护理的非避孕者也报告了略高的结果水平(aOR = 2.2, CI 1.0-5.1)。最近接受以人为中心的避孕咨询的避孕药具使用者由于成本原因,未实现避孕偏好的几率略低(aOR = 0.6, CI 0.4-1.0)。结论费用是避孕药具使用者和非避孕药具使用者使用首选避孕药具的障碍;健康保险覆盖范围和以人为本的避孕咨询可以帮助避孕使用者克服成本障碍,实现他们的避孕偏好。与系统层面的避孕获取相关的因素——特别是避孕护理的补贴和经验——影响成本是否成为个人避孕偏好的障碍。提供以病人为中心的护理和扩大医疗保险覆盖范围,有助于减轻成本障碍,使个人能够实现自己的避孕偏好。
{"title":"Associations between unfulfilled contraceptive preferences due to cost and low-income patients’ access to and experiences of contraceptive care in the United States, 2015–2019","authors":"Megan L. Kavanaugh, Emma Pliskin, Rubina Hussain","doi":"10.1016/j.conx.2022.100076","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.conx.2022.100076","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To identify prevalence of unfulfilled contraceptive preferences due to cost among low-income United States female contraceptive method users and nonusers, and associations between access to, and experience with, contraceptive care and this outcome.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We drew on data from the 2015–2019 National Surveys of Family Growth to conduct simple and multivariable logistic regression analyses on unfulfilled contraceptive preferences due to cost among nationally representative samples of low-income women ages 15 to 49 who were current contraceptive users (<em>N</em> = 3178) and nonusers (<em>N</em> = 1073).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 23% of female contraceptive users reported they would use a different method, and 39% of nonusers reported they would start using a method, if cost were not an issue. Controlling for user characteristics, low-income contraceptive users who received recent publicly supported contraceptive care reported significantly higher levels of unfulfilled contraceptive preferences due to cost than those without any access to SRH care (aOR = 1.6, CI 1.0–2.5), while having private (aOR = 0.6, CI 0.4–0.9) or public (aOR = 0.7, CI 0.5–1.0) health insurance was associated with significantly lower levels of this outcome. Nonusers of contraception who had recently received publicly supported contraceptive care also reported marginally higher levels of this outcome (aOR = 2.2, CI 1.0–5.1). Contraceptive users who received recent person-centered contraceptive counseling had marginally lower odds of unfulfilled contraceptive preferences due to cost (aOR = 0.6, CI 0.4–1.0).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Cost is a barrier to using preferred contraception for both contraceptive users and nonusers; health insurance coverage and person-centered contraceptive counseling may help contraceptive users to overcome cost barriers and realize their contraceptive preferences.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>Factors related to contraceptive access at the systems level—specifically the subsidization and experience of contraceptive care—impact whether cost serves as a barrier to individuals’ contraceptive preferences. Delivery of patient-centered care and shoring up health insurance coverage for all can help to mitigate cost barriers and enable individuals to realize their contraceptive preferences.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10655,"journal":{"name":"Contraception: X","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100076"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151622000053/pdfft?md5=e0f143f55359f22eff42e1e77d5056ca&pid=1-s2.0-S2590151622000053-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49628151","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.conx.2022.100077
Dana O. Sarnak , Elizabeth Gummerson , Shannon N. Wood , Funmilola M. OlaOlorun , Simon Peter Sebina Kibira , Linnea A. Zimmerman , Philip Anglewicz
Objectives
A more nuanced understanding of contributors to covert contraceptive use remains critical to protecting covert users and reducing its necessity. This study aimed to examine the overall prevalence of covert use, and sociodemographic characteristics associated with covert vs overt use across multiple geographies in sub-Saharan Africa and Asia.
Study Design
Performance Monitoring for Action (PMA) is one of the few nationally representative surveys that measures covert use across socially diverse contexts via a direct question. Utilizing PMA 2019–2020 phase 1 data from Burkina Faso, Côte D'Ivoire, Kenya, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC; Kinshasa and Kongo Central regions), Uganda, Nigeria (Kano and Lagos), Niger, and Rajasthan, we estimated overall prevalence of covert use. We conducted bivariate analyses and multivariate logistic regressions for 6 sites, comparing the odds of covert use with overt use among users of contraception by sociodemographic characteristics.
Results
Covert use ranged from 1% in Rajasthan to 16% in Burkina Faso. Marital status was the only sociodemographic characteristic consistently associated with type of use across sites. Specifically, polygynous marriage (compared to monogamous) increased odds of using covertly, ranging from adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 1.8 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2–2.7] in Burkina Faso to 6.2 [95% CI 2.9–13.3] in Kinshasa. Unmarried women with partners or boyfriends were also more likely to be using covertly compared with their monogamously married counterparts in all sites (aORs ranged from 2.2 [95% CI 1.0–4.7] in Uganda to 4.4 [95% CI 1.7–11.0] in Kinshasa).
Conclusion
Understanding factors associated with covert use has programmatic and policy implications for women's reproductive autonomy.
Implications
Covert use is a common phenomenon across most sites, representing a small but programmatically important contingent of users. Family planning providers and programs must protect access to and maintain privacy of reproductive services to this population, but should also focus on creating interventions and environments that support overt use.
目的更细致地了解隐蔽避孕措施使用的原因对于保护隐蔽使用者和减少其必要性至关重要。本研究旨在调查撒哈拉以南非洲和亚洲多个地区隐蔽用药的总体流行情况,以及与隐蔽用药和公开用药相关的社会人口特征。研究设计行动绩效监测(PMA)是少数具有全国代表性的调查之一,通过直接问题来衡量社会不同背景下的隐蔽使用。利用来自布基纳法索、Côte科特迪瓦、肯尼亚、刚果民主共和国(DRC);金沙萨和刚果中部地区),乌干达,尼日利亚(卡诺和拉各斯),尼日尔和拉贾斯坦邦,我们估计了隐蔽使用的总体流行率。我们对6个地点进行了双变量分析和多变量logistic回归,通过社会人口学特征比较避孕使用者中隐蔽使用和公开使用的几率。结果隐蔽使用范围从拉贾斯坦邦的1%到布基纳法索的16%不等。婚姻状况是唯一与网站使用类型一致的社会人口学特征。具体而言,一夫多妻制婚姻(与一夫一妻制相比)增加了秘密使用的几率,调整后的优势比(aOR)在布基纳法索为1.8[95%可信区间(CI) 1.2-2.7],在金沙萨为6.2 [95% CI 2.9-13.3]。与一夫一妻制的已婚女性相比,有伴侣或男友的未婚女性也更有可能秘密使用大麻(比值比从乌干达的2.2 [95% CI 1.0-4.7]到金沙萨的4.4 [95% CI 1.7-11.0]不等)。结论了解与隐蔽使用相关的因素对妇女生殖自主具有规划和政策意义。隐含使用是大多数站点的常见现象,代表了一小部分但在程序上很重要的用户。计划生育提供者和项目必须保护这一人群获得生殖服务的机会并维护其隐私,但也应侧重于创造支持公开使用的干预措施和环境。
{"title":"Prevalence and characteristics of covert contraceptive use in the Performance Monitoring for Action multi-country study","authors":"Dana O. Sarnak , Elizabeth Gummerson , Shannon N. Wood , Funmilola M. OlaOlorun , Simon Peter Sebina Kibira , Linnea A. Zimmerman , Philip Anglewicz","doi":"10.1016/j.conx.2022.100077","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.conx.2022.100077","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>A more nuanced understanding of contributors to covert contraceptive use remains critical to protecting covert users and reducing its necessity. This study aimed to examine the overall prevalence of covert use, and sociodemographic characteristics associated with covert vs overt use across multiple geographies in sub-Saharan Africa and Asia.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><p>Performance Monitoring for Action (PMA) is one of the few nationally representative surveys that measures covert use across socially diverse contexts via a direct question. Utilizing PMA 2019–2020 phase 1 data from Burkina Faso, Côte D'Ivoire, Kenya, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC; Kinshasa and Kongo Central regions), Uganda, Nigeria (Kano and Lagos), Niger, and Rajasthan, we estimated overall prevalence of covert use. We conducted bivariate analyses and multivariate logistic regressions for 6 sites, comparing the odds of covert use with overt use among users of contraception by sociodemographic characteristics.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Covert use ranged from 1% in Rajasthan to 16% in Burkina Faso. Marital status was the only sociodemographic characteristic consistently associated with type of use across sites. Specifically, polygynous marriage (compared to monogamous) increased odds of using covertly, ranging from adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 1.8 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2–2.7] in Burkina Faso to 6.2 [95% CI 2.9–13.3] in Kinshasa. Unmarried women with partners or boyfriends were also more likely to be using covertly compared with their monogamously married counterparts in all sites (aORs ranged from 2.2 [95% CI 1.0–4.7] in Uganda to 4.4 [95% CI 1.7–11.0] in Kinshasa).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Understanding factors associated with covert use has programmatic and policy implications for women's reproductive autonomy.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>Covert use is a common phenomenon across most sites, representing a small but programmatically important contingent of users. Family planning providers and programs must protect access to and maintain privacy of reproductive services to this population, but should also focus on creating interventions and environments that support overt use.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10655,"journal":{"name":"Contraception: X","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100077"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151622000065/pdfft?md5=3007353004d54d90231c3df2822ff833&pid=1-s2.0-S2590151622000065-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41616574","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.conx.2022.100086
Christine Aristide , Brooke W. Bullington , Magdalena Kuguru , Radhika Sundararajan , Natalie T. Nguyen , Valencia J. Lambert , Agrey H. Mwakisole , Joyce Wamoyi , Jennifer A. Downs
Objectives
In Tanzania, contraceptive use is limited, particularly in rural communities and even among women who would like to delay childbearing. This paper aims to present health providers’ perspectives on populations seeking contraception and barriers that could be addressed to increase access to and uptake of contraception, given their interface with large portions of their communities.
Study Design
We conducted 18 in-depth interviews with providers stationed at health dispensaries in six rural villages in northwest Tanzania. Two investigators independently coded interviews using a stepwise process to achieve consensus on prevalent topics.
Results
Three topics emerged from our analysis: (1) nature of clients seeking contraception; (2) barriers to uptake of contraception; and (3) the role of secrecy in obtaining and using contraception. Health providers reported that married women with children were the most frequent users of contraception, alongside some single women, men, sex workers, and students. Barriers to contraception included lack of supplies and trained staff, misconceptions and fears, stigma, and unsupportive partners. Providers observed that contraception was often used secretly. They reported surreptitious visits and described clients’ preferential use of discreet methods. Providers respected and supported clients’ desires to keep visits confidential.
Conclusion
Our data suggest maintaining high stocks of discreet contraceptive methods and deploying more trained staff to dispensaries could increase availability and access to contraceptives. At the community level, more education campaigns are warranted to address barriers, especially those related to stigma.
Implications
Our work highlights the need for additional contraceptive methods that are easy to administer and discreet for women who must maintain secrecy. Future studies of the effectiveness of interventions and new contraceptives should obtain healthcare providers’ perspectives, as they can provide important insights to service provision.
{"title":"Health providers’ perspectives on contraceptive use in rural Northwest Tanzania: A qualitative study","authors":"Christine Aristide , Brooke W. Bullington , Magdalena Kuguru , Radhika Sundararajan , Natalie T. Nguyen , Valencia J. Lambert , Agrey H. Mwakisole , Joyce Wamoyi , Jennifer A. Downs","doi":"10.1016/j.conx.2022.100086","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.conx.2022.100086","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>In Tanzania, contraceptive use is limited, particularly in rural communities and even among women who would like to delay childbearing. This paper aims to present health providers’ perspectives on populations seeking contraception and barriers that could be addressed to increase access to and uptake of contraception, given their interface with large portions of their communities.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><p>We conducted 18 in-depth interviews with providers stationed at health dispensaries in six rural villages in northwest Tanzania. Two investigators independently coded interviews using a stepwise process to achieve consensus on prevalent topics.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Three topics emerged from our analysis: (1) nature of clients seeking contraception; (2) barriers to uptake of contraception; and (3) the role of secrecy in obtaining and using contraception. Health providers reported that married women with children were the most frequent users of contraception, alongside some single women, men, sex workers, and students. Barriers to contraception included lack of supplies and trained staff, misconceptions and fears, stigma, and unsupportive partners. Providers observed that contraception was often used secretly. They reported surreptitious visits and described clients’ preferential use of discreet methods. Providers respected and supported clients’ desires to keep visits confidential.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our data suggest maintaining high stocks of discreet contraceptive methods and deploying more trained staff to dispensaries could increase availability and access to contraceptives. At the community level, more education campaigns are warranted to address barriers, especially those related to stigma.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>Our work highlights the need for additional contraceptive methods that are easy to administer and discreet for women who must maintain secrecy. Future studies of the effectiveness of interventions and new contraceptives should obtain healthcare providers’ perspectives, as they can provide important insights to service provision.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10655,"journal":{"name":"Contraception: X","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100086"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0c/5e/main.PMC9618975.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10672455","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.conx.2022.100083
Iris Huang , Rebecca Delay , Angel Boulware , Ashley McHugh , Zarina Jaffer Wong , Amy K. Whitaker , Debra Stulberg , Lee Hasselbacher
Objective
To solicit Illinois staff and clinician perspectives on rapid implementation of telehealth for contraceptive counseling and recommendations to improve and sustain it in the long term.
Study design
Researchers recruited and interviewed clinicians (n = 20) in primary care and obstetrics/gynecology clinics across 13 health care systems in Illinois, as well as clinicians (n = 11), leadership (n = 6) and staff (n = 7) from Planned Parenthood of Illinois clinics. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we coded and analyzed interview transcripts in Dedoose with a focus on themes regarding steps to improve quality and sustainability of telehealth.
Results
Participants expressed generally positive attitudes towards telehealth, noting that it increased access to care and time for patient education. Still, many highlighted areas of implementation that needed improvement. Clinic operations were complicated by gaps in telehealth training and the logistical needs of balancing telehealth and in-person appointments. Clinics had difficulty ensuring patient awareness of telehealth as an option for care, in addition to deficiencies with the telehealth technology itself. Finally, innovative resources for telehealth patients, while existent, have not been evenly offered across clinics. This includes the use of self-injection birth control, as well as providing medical equipment such as blood pressure cuffs in community settings. Some themes reflect issues specific to contraceptive counseling while others reflect issues with telehealth implementation in general, including confusion about reimbursement.
Conclusion
Illinois contraceptive care providers and staff wish to sustain telehealth for the long term, while also recommending specific improvements to patient communications, clinic operations, and access to supportive resources.
Implications
Our study highlights considerations for clinics to optimize implementation of telehealth services for contraceptive care. Providers described the value of clear workflows to balance in-person and telehealth visits, streamlined communications platforms, targeted patient outreach, training on providing virtual contraceptive care, and creative approaches to ensuring patient access to resources.
{"title":"Telehealth for contraceptive care: Lessons from staff and clinicians for improving implementation and sustainability in Illinois","authors":"Iris Huang , Rebecca Delay , Angel Boulware , Ashley McHugh , Zarina Jaffer Wong , Amy K. Whitaker , Debra Stulberg , Lee Hasselbacher","doi":"10.1016/j.conx.2022.100083","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.conx.2022.100083","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To solicit Illinois staff and clinician perspectives on rapid implementation of telehealth for contraceptive counseling and recommendations to improve and sustain it in the long term.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Researchers recruited and interviewed clinicians (<em>n</em> = 20) in primary care and obstetrics/gynecology clinics across 13 health care systems in Illinois, as well as clinicians (<em>n</em> = 11), leadership (<em>n</em> = 6) and staff (<em>n</em> = 7) from Planned Parenthood of Illinois clinics. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we coded and analyzed interview transcripts in Dedoose with a focus on themes regarding steps to improve quality and sustainability of telehealth.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Participants expressed generally positive attitudes towards telehealth, noting that it increased access to care and time for patient education. Still, many highlighted areas of implementation that needed improvement. Clinic operations were complicated by gaps in telehealth training and the logistical needs of balancing telehealth and in-person appointments. Clinics had difficulty ensuring patient awareness of telehealth as an option for care, in addition to deficiencies with the telehealth technology itself. Finally, innovative resources for telehealth patients, while existent, have not been evenly offered across clinics. This includes the use of self-injection birth control, as well as providing medical equipment such as blood pressure cuffs in community settings. Some themes reflect issues specific to contraceptive counseling while others reflect issues with telehealth implementation in general, including confusion about reimbursement.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Illinois contraceptive care providers and staff wish to sustain telehealth for the long term, while also recommending specific improvements to patient communications, clinic operations, and access to supportive resources.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>Our study highlights considerations for clinics to optimize implementation of telehealth services for contraceptive care. Providers described the value of clear workflows to balance in-person and telehealth visits, streamlined communications platforms, targeted patient outreach, training on providing virtual contraceptive care, and creative approaches to ensuring patient access to resources.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10655,"journal":{"name":"Contraception: X","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100083"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/56/9e/main.PMC9436702.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40349613","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}