Pub Date : 2026-01-22DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000007033
Simon Tetlow, Matthew Birch, Manish Verma, Robert Gatherer, Stephen J Shepherd
Objectives: To review the systems of care, logistics, staffing considerations, and best practices to facilitate safe interhospital transfer of critically ill patients with cardiac pathology.
Data sources: Publications were identified using a Medline search using terms related to interhospital transfer, systems of care, published guidelines, and cardiac conditions.
Study selection: A screening and shortlisting process was carried out by three of the authors to identify relevant studies, case reports, and guidelines.
Data extraction: Data from relevant articles were qualitatively evaluated.
Data synthesis: The interhospital transfer of critically ill cardiac patients presents significant clinical and logistical challenges. These patients benefit from access to specialized care but require meticulous physiologic management during transport and are at risk of deterioration. Structured communication systems, telemedicine, and specialized critical care transfer teams enhance patient selection, pre-transfer optimization, and in-transit management. The use of mechanical circulatory support devices, such as intra-aortic balloon pumps and microaxial flow pumps, adds further complexity.
Conclusions: Despite the high-acuity nature of these transfers, evidence from case series and observational studies demonstrates that, with appropriately trained teams and rigorous protocols, critically ill cardiac patients can be safely transported between facilities. This review highlights the importance of structured protocols, telemedicine, and specialized transport teams.
{"title":"Interhospital Transfer of Critically Ill Cardiac Patients.","authors":"Simon Tetlow, Matthew Birch, Manish Verma, Robert Gatherer, Stephen J Shepherd","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000007033","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000007033","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To review the systems of care, logistics, staffing considerations, and best practices to facilitate safe interhospital transfer of critically ill patients with cardiac pathology.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Publications were identified using a Medline search using terms related to interhospital transfer, systems of care, published guidelines, and cardiac conditions.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>A screening and shortlisting process was carried out by three of the authors to identify relevant studies, case reports, and guidelines.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Data from relevant articles were qualitatively evaluated.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>The interhospital transfer of critically ill cardiac patients presents significant clinical and logistical challenges. These patients benefit from access to specialized care but require meticulous physiologic management during transport and are at risk of deterioration. Structured communication systems, telemedicine, and specialized critical care transfer teams enhance patient selection, pre-transfer optimization, and in-transit management. The use of mechanical circulatory support devices, such as intra-aortic balloon pumps and microaxial flow pumps, adds further complexity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the high-acuity nature of these transfers, evidence from case series and observational studies demonstrates that, with appropriately trained teams and rigorous protocols, critically ill cardiac patients can be safely transported between facilities. This review highlights the importance of structured protocols, telemedicine, and specialized transport teams.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146017699","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: Severe infections can lead to substantial reductions in T cell counts, yet its prognostic relevance and potential cytokine-mediated mechanisms remain poorly defined in pediatric populations. This study aimed to investigate whether T cell counts are associated with mortality, and to what extent this association is mediated by circulating cytokines.
Design: Prospective cohort study.
Setting: A 55-bed PICU.
Patients: Children 28 days to 18 years old admitted to the PICU due to infections, excluding those with preexisting conditions known to potentially impact T cell counts.
Interventions: None.
Measurements and main results: A total of 252 patients were enrolled, with a median age of 4.16 years (interquartile range: 1.18-7.73), and 56.35% were male. CD3+ T cell count was nonlinearly associated with mortality (p overall = 0.027; p nonlinear = 0.013), with a risk plateau beyond the inflection point at 705.14 cells/μL in restricted cubic spline models. The lower T cell group had markedly increased 30-, 60-, and 90-day mortality (p < 0.05). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients in the lower T cell group had significantly higher mortality (p = 0.011). Multivariable Cox models confirmed an independent association between low T cell group and increased mortality risk, with a hazard ratio of 2.62 (95% CI, 1.12-6.14) for 90-day mortality. Mediation analysis showed that platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-AA mediates a substantial portion of this effect, accounting for 71.19% of the total pathway.
Conclusions: Early T cell depletion independently predicts mortality in critically ill children with severe infections. These findings support the prognostic value of early immune profiling and suggest a potential immunoregulatory role for PDGF-AA.
{"title":"Early T-Lymphocyte Depletion Predicts Mortality in Critically Ill Children With Severe Infections: An Exploratory Analysis of Cytokine Pathways.","authors":"Zimei Cheng, Jinxin Wang, Caiyan Zhang, Weiming Chen, Yi Zhang, Tingyan Liu, Yixue Wang, Xuemei Zhu, Kexin Wang, Yaodong Wang, Hetian Zhou, Reyihangu Awuti, Yukun Huang, Lu Guoping","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000007032","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000007032","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Severe infections can lead to substantial reductions in T cell counts, yet its prognostic relevance and potential cytokine-mediated mechanisms remain poorly defined in pediatric populations. This study aimed to investigate whether T cell counts are associated with mortality, and to what extent this association is mediated by circulating cytokines.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A 55-bed PICU.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Children 28 days to 18 years old admitted to the PICU due to infections, excluding those with preexisting conditions known to potentially impact T cell counts.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>A total of 252 patients were enrolled, with a median age of 4.16 years (interquartile range: 1.18-7.73), and 56.35% were male. CD3+ T cell count was nonlinearly associated with mortality (p overall = 0.027; p nonlinear = 0.013), with a risk plateau beyond the inflection point at 705.14 cells/μL in restricted cubic spline models. The lower T cell group had markedly increased 30-, 60-, and 90-day mortality (p < 0.05). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients in the lower T cell group had significantly higher mortality (p = 0.011). Multivariable Cox models confirmed an independent association between low T cell group and increased mortality risk, with a hazard ratio of 2.62 (95% CI, 1.12-6.14) for 90-day mortality. Mediation analysis showed that platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-AA mediates a substantial portion of this effect, accounting for 71.19% of the total pathway.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early T cell depletion independently predicts mortality in critically ill children with severe infections. These findings support the prognostic value of early immune profiling and suggest a potential immunoregulatory role for PDGF-AA.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146017678","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-20DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000007042
Rafał Kopańczyk, Patrick M Wieruszewski, Wenyuan Yin, William P Mulvoy, Krzysztof Laudanski, Danny Theodore, Payal K Gurnani, Robert E Szczypta, Nathan J Smischney, Jenna S Naslund, T Caroline Bank, Michelle Rausen, Mary Jarzebowski, Markisha R Wilder, Jason C Brainard, Ambrish B Patel, Krassimir Denchev, Stuart Feichtinger, Ronald G Pearl
Objective: Volatile anesthetics (VAs) are gaining renewed interest as a sedation strategy in the intensive care, offering an alternative to traditional IV agents. VAs provide several pharmacologic advantages, including rapid onset and offset, minimal systemic metabolism, and favorable recovery profiles. Advances in delivery systems enabled the safe and practical administration of volatile agents in the ICU. Thus, we aimed to describe the pharmacology and safety aspects of inhaled agents as well as the systems designed to deliver VAs in the ICU.
Data sources: Relevant literature was identified through PubMed and MEDLINE databases.
Study selection: Original research, review articles, commentaries, and guidelines addressing safety, efficacy, and use of VAs in adult ICU patients were included.
Data extraction: Studies were reviewed by the authors, with key findings summarized and organized by pharmacologic properties, delivery systems, and safety domains.
Data synthesis: VAs are halogenated hydrocarbons whose mechanism of action is not fully understood. Although the CNS is the primary site of action, the end-tidal concentration of exhaled anesthetic is used to monitor clinical effects such as immobility to a noxious stimulus. Inhaled agents have unique pharmacokinetics, minimal metabolisms, and distinct recovery. The side effect profile is also unique, with malignant hyperthermia being the most feared, yet rare complication. Two systems for inhalational sedation delivery are available internationally, with one currently under evaluation in the United States. The systems are composed of a miniature vaporizer, delivery controller, and a monitor. The systems have distinct safety considerations, such as tidal volume limits.
Conclusions: VAs can be used as sedative agents in the ICU. This article comprehensively reviews the pharmacology of VAs along with their safety profile and describes the structure and function of miniature vaporizers currently available on the world market.
{"title":"Volatile Anesthetics: A Comprehensive Review of Pharmacology, Delivery Systems, and Safety Considerations for ICU Practitioners.","authors":"Rafał Kopańczyk, Patrick M Wieruszewski, Wenyuan Yin, William P Mulvoy, Krzysztof Laudanski, Danny Theodore, Payal K Gurnani, Robert E Szczypta, Nathan J Smischney, Jenna S Naslund, T Caroline Bank, Michelle Rausen, Mary Jarzebowski, Markisha R Wilder, Jason C Brainard, Ambrish B Patel, Krassimir Denchev, Stuart Feichtinger, Ronald G Pearl","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000007042","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000007042","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Volatile anesthetics (VAs) are gaining renewed interest as a sedation strategy in the intensive care, offering an alternative to traditional IV agents. VAs provide several pharmacologic advantages, including rapid onset and offset, minimal systemic metabolism, and favorable recovery profiles. Advances in delivery systems enabled the safe and practical administration of volatile agents in the ICU. Thus, we aimed to describe the pharmacology and safety aspects of inhaled agents as well as the systems designed to deliver VAs in the ICU.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Relevant literature was identified through PubMed and MEDLINE databases.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Original research, review articles, commentaries, and guidelines addressing safety, efficacy, and use of VAs in adult ICU patients were included.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Studies were reviewed by the authors, with key findings summarized and organized by pharmacologic properties, delivery systems, and safety domains.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>VAs are halogenated hydrocarbons whose mechanism of action is not fully understood. Although the CNS is the primary site of action, the end-tidal concentration of exhaled anesthetic is used to monitor clinical effects such as immobility to a noxious stimulus. Inhaled agents have unique pharmacokinetics, minimal metabolisms, and distinct recovery. The side effect profile is also unique, with malignant hyperthermia being the most feared, yet rare complication. Two systems for inhalational sedation delivery are available internationally, with one currently under evaluation in the United States. The systems are composed of a miniature vaporizer, delivery controller, and a monitor. The systems have distinct safety considerations, such as tidal volume limits.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>VAs can be used as sedative agents in the ICU. This article comprehensively reviews the pharmacology of VAs along with their safety profile and describes the structure and function of miniature vaporizers currently available on the world market.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146009047","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-20DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000007027
Maria Elena De Piero, Francesco Alessandri, Silvia Mariani, Michele Di Mauro, Danilo Alunni Fegatelli, Francesco Pugliese, Justine Mafalda Ravaux, Daniel Brodie, Darryl Abrams, Lars Mikael Broman, Thomas Mueller, Fabio Silvio Taccone, Mirko Belliato, Dinis Dos Reis Miranda, Justyna Swol, Maximilian Valentin Malfertheiner, Mariusz Kowalewski, Giles J Peek, Xiaotong Hou, John F Fraser, Graeme MacLaren, Joseph E Tonna, Matteo Di Nardo, Roberto Lorusso
Objectives: Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) represents a standard and well-accepted modality of treating patients with refractory respiratory failure. Nevertheless, some patients might develop refractory hypoxemia, hemodynamic compromise or end-organ perfusion requiring a change. This study analyzed characteristics and outcomes of patients requiring a change from venovenous to a different ECMO configuration.
Design: Multicenter, retrospective, observational analysis of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry (2010-2020) in adult patients (≥ 18 yr old) underwent venovenous ECMO as initial cannulation strategy.
Setting and patients: Comparison of patients who remained on venovenous ECMO vs. those who underwent configuration conversion and multivariable analysis to assess variables associated with configuration change.
Interventions: None.
Measurements and main results: Among 28,888 eligible venovenous ECMO runs, 702 (2.4%) received a change from the original configuration, including 399 (56.8%) conversions to venoarterial and 303 (43.2%) to hybrid ECMO configurations. Variables associated with conversion included: pre-ECMO cardiac conditions, bridge to lung transplant as indication, use of milrinone, epinephrine, sildenafil, bicarbonate, and 24-hour Pao2 value. Conversion occurred at a median of 56 hours (interquartile range, 11.5-210 hr) after ECMO initiation, with earlier conversion to hybrid configuration. Increased rates of cardiovascular, hemorrhagic, vascular, renal, metabolic, infective, and circuit-related complications were reported in converted patients. In-hospital mortality was higher in converted patients (60.8%) overall, and highest for venovenous to venoarterial patients (63.2%).
Conclusions: The venovenous patients converted to other ECMO configurations were 2.4% and experienced higher complication and mortality rates. Variables associated with conversion highlight the importance of initial configuration selection and should be considered as part of the risk stratification framework when evaluating a patient for individualized ECMO support mode/configuration.
{"title":"Conversion From Venovenous to Venoarterial or Hybrid Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Analysis From the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry.","authors":"Maria Elena De Piero, Francesco Alessandri, Silvia Mariani, Michele Di Mauro, Danilo Alunni Fegatelli, Francesco Pugliese, Justine Mafalda Ravaux, Daniel Brodie, Darryl Abrams, Lars Mikael Broman, Thomas Mueller, Fabio Silvio Taccone, Mirko Belliato, Dinis Dos Reis Miranda, Justyna Swol, Maximilian Valentin Malfertheiner, Mariusz Kowalewski, Giles J Peek, Xiaotong Hou, John F Fraser, Graeme MacLaren, Joseph E Tonna, Matteo Di Nardo, Roberto Lorusso","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000007027","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000007027","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) represents a standard and well-accepted modality of treating patients with refractory respiratory failure. Nevertheless, some patients might develop refractory hypoxemia, hemodynamic compromise or end-organ perfusion requiring a change. This study analyzed characteristics and outcomes of patients requiring a change from venovenous to a different ECMO configuration.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multicenter, retrospective, observational analysis of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry (2010-2020) in adult patients (≥ 18 yr old) underwent venovenous ECMO as initial cannulation strategy.</p><p><strong>Setting and patients: </strong>Comparison of patients who remained on venovenous ECMO vs. those who underwent configuration conversion and multivariable analysis to assess variables associated with configuration change.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Among 28,888 eligible venovenous ECMO runs, 702 (2.4%) received a change from the original configuration, including 399 (56.8%) conversions to venoarterial and 303 (43.2%) to hybrid ECMO configurations. Variables associated with conversion included: pre-ECMO cardiac conditions, bridge to lung transplant as indication, use of milrinone, epinephrine, sildenafil, bicarbonate, and 24-hour Pao2 value. Conversion occurred at a median of 56 hours (interquartile range, 11.5-210 hr) after ECMO initiation, with earlier conversion to hybrid configuration. Increased rates of cardiovascular, hemorrhagic, vascular, renal, metabolic, infective, and circuit-related complications were reported in converted patients. In-hospital mortality was higher in converted patients (60.8%) overall, and highest for venovenous to venoarterial patients (63.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The venovenous patients converted to other ECMO configurations were 2.4% and experienced higher complication and mortality rates. Variables associated with conversion highlight the importance of initial configuration selection and should be considered as part of the risk stratification framework when evaluating a patient for individualized ECMO support mode/configuration.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146009022","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-15DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000007026
Georgios Mavrovounis, Eleftherios Beltsios, Ioannis Boutsikos, Vasilis-Spyridon Tseriotis, Themis Gkraikou, Paraskevi Papageorgiou, Maria Mermiri, Antonis Adamou, Dimitrios G Chatzis, Theodosis Kalamatianos, Ioannis Pantazopoulos
Objectives: To evaluate the prognostic accuracy of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) levels in predicting poor neurologic outcomes in adult patients after cardiac arrest, across different post-resuscitation timepoints.
Data sources: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were systematically searched up to June 12, 2025.
Study selection: Eligible studies included randomized controlled or observational studies enrolling adult or pediatric patients with in- or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest who achieved return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), measured GFAP in any biofluid, and reported neurologic outcomes.
Data extraction: Three independent reviewers extracted data on study design, population, arrest characteristics, GFAP sampling methods, outcome definitions, and prognostic performance. Study quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool.
Data synthesis: Twenty studies were included in the systematic review; 12 contributed to meta-analyses. Median GFAP levels were significantly higher in patients with poor neurologic outcomes at 24 hours (Δ = 138.1 pg/mL), 48 hours (Δ = 471.1 pg/mL), and 72 hours (Δ = 745.7 pg/mL) post-ROSC. Summary area under the curve values for prognostic accuracy improved over time: 0.76 at 24 hours, 0.84 at 48 hours, and 0.88 at 72 hours. Subgroup analyses limited to 6-month outcomes and out-of-hospital arrests showed consistent results. Quality assessment revealed low applicability concerns but moderate risk of bias in patient selection and flow/timing.
Conclusions: GFAP demonstrates time-dependent prognostic utility in predicting poor neurologic outcomes after cardiac arrest in adults, with optimal performance at 48-72 hours post-ROSC. These findings support suggest that GFAP shows potential as a time-dependent biomarker but remains investigational. Further prospective studies are needed to validate its clinical utility and to determine standardized cutoff values before routine implementation.
目的:评估神经胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)水平在不同复苏后时间点预测心脏骤停后成人患者不良神经系统预后的准确性。数据来源:PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, b谷歌Scholar系统检索截止到2025年6月12日。研究选择:符合条件的研究包括随机对照或观察性研究,纳入院内或院外心脏骤停的成人或儿童患者,这些患者实现了自发循环(ROSC)的恢复,测量了任何生物体液中的GFAP,并报告了神经学结果。数据提取:三位独立的审查员提取了研究设计、人群、骤停特征、GFAP抽样方法、结果定义和预后表现方面的数据。使用诊断准确性研究质量评估-2工具评估研究质量。数据综合:系统评价纳入了20项研究;12人参与了荟萃分析。在rosc后24小时(Δ = 138.1 pg/mL)、48小时(Δ = 471.1 pg/mL)和72小时(Δ = 745.7 pg/mL),神经系统预后较差的患者中位GFAP水平显著升高。随着时间的推移,预测准确性曲线下的总面积有所提高:24小时为0.76,48小时为0.84,72小时为0.88。亚组分析仅限于6个月的结果和院外逮捕显示一致的结果。质量评估显示适用性问题较低,但在患者选择和流量/时机方面存在中等偏倚风险。结论:GFAP在预测成人心脏骤停后不良神经系统预后方面具有时间依赖性,在rosc后48-72小时表现最佳。这些发现支持了GFAP作为一种时间依赖性生物标志物的潜力,但仍处于研究阶段。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来验证其临床应用,并在常规实施前确定标准化的临界值。
{"title":"Neuroprognostication After Cardiac Arrest Using Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Georgios Mavrovounis, Eleftherios Beltsios, Ioannis Boutsikos, Vasilis-Spyridon Tseriotis, Themis Gkraikou, Paraskevi Papageorgiou, Maria Mermiri, Antonis Adamou, Dimitrios G Chatzis, Theodosis Kalamatianos, Ioannis Pantazopoulos","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000007026","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000007026","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the prognostic accuracy of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) levels in predicting poor neurologic outcomes in adult patients after cardiac arrest, across different post-resuscitation timepoints.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were systematically searched up to June 12, 2025.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Eligible studies included randomized controlled or observational studies enrolling adult or pediatric patients with in- or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest who achieved return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), measured GFAP in any biofluid, and reported neurologic outcomes.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Three independent reviewers extracted data on study design, population, arrest characteristics, GFAP sampling methods, outcome definitions, and prognostic performance. Study quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>Twenty studies were included in the systematic review; 12 contributed to meta-analyses. Median GFAP levels were significantly higher in patients with poor neurologic outcomes at 24 hours (Δ = 138.1 pg/mL), 48 hours (Δ = 471.1 pg/mL), and 72 hours (Δ = 745.7 pg/mL) post-ROSC. Summary area under the curve values for prognostic accuracy improved over time: 0.76 at 24 hours, 0.84 at 48 hours, and 0.88 at 72 hours. Subgroup analyses limited to 6-month outcomes and out-of-hospital arrests showed consistent results. Quality assessment revealed low applicability concerns but moderate risk of bias in patient selection and flow/timing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GFAP demonstrates time-dependent prognostic utility in predicting poor neurologic outcomes after cardiac arrest in adults, with optimal performance at 48-72 hours post-ROSC. These findings support suggest that GFAP shows potential as a time-dependent biomarker but remains investigational. Further prospective studies are needed to validate its clinical utility and to determine standardized cutoff values before routine implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145988194","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-15DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000007024
Alexander T Moffett, Gary E Weissman
{"title":"Foundation Models Have Yet to Demonstrate Feasibility, Safety, or Effectiveness for Data Analysis or Decision Support in the ICU.","authors":"Alexander T Moffett, Gary E Weissman","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000007024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000007024","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145988154","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-15DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000007019
Sivasubramanium V Bhavani, Xiao Hu
{"title":"It Is Time to Move Beyond Task-Specific Critical Care Prediction Models and Prioritize a Foundation Model Built on Continuous Physiological Data.","authors":"Sivasubramanium V Bhavani, Xiao Hu","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000007019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000007019","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145988199","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-14DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000007030
Joshua I Gordon, Preston T So, Joseph McElroy, Nathan E Brummel
Objectives: We know little of the impact that pre-critical illness physical function plays in the recovery from critical illness. The agreement between patients and surrogates on physical function questionnaires is unclear.
Design, setting, and patients: Prospective observational cohort conducted at a tertiary medical center. We enrolled patient-participants who were treated for respiratory failure, shock, and/or sepsis and their well-chosen surrogates.
Interventions: None.
Measurements and main results: We assessed patient-participant physical function anchored on the 4 weeks before admission using the virtual Short Physical Performance Battery (vSPPB); Strength, Assistance in Walking, Rising from a Chair, Climbing Stairs, Falls (SARC-F) questionnaire; and Fatigue, Resistance, Ambulation, Illness, and Loss of weight (FRAIL) questionnaire completed by both patient and surrogate participants. The primary outcome was agreement between patient and surrogate responses on composite scores from each questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included correlations between patient and surrogate responses, and the relationship between surrogate and patient responses. We enrolled 75 patient-surrogate dyads. Patient-participants had a median (interquartile range) age of 61 (52-69), a Charlson Comorbidity Index of 2 (1-2), and a baseline activities of daily living disability score of 3 (1-7). Most surrogates were spouses (68%), who spent an average of 20 hours per day (12-24 hr/d) with patients. We found fair agreement between patient and surrogate scores on the vSPPB (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC], 0.52; 95% CI, 0.31-0.69), SARC-F (ICC, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.22-0.60), and FRAIL (ICC, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.24-0.63). We found moderate correlation between patient and surrogate scores on the vSPPB, SARC-F, and FRAIL (Spearman r 0.60, 0.46, and 0.53, respectively [p < 0.001]).
Conclusions: We found fair agreement and moderate correlation on previously validated self-report questionnaires of physical function. Patients reported better function than their surrogates particularly at lower levels of function. Our findings highlight the need for further development of tools to assess pre-critical illness physical function.
{"title":"Agreement Between Patient and Surrogate Assessments of Pre-Critical Illness Physical Function.","authors":"Joshua I Gordon, Preston T So, Joseph McElroy, Nathan E Brummel","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000007030","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000007030","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We know little of the impact that pre-critical illness physical function plays in the recovery from critical illness. The agreement between patients and surrogates on physical function questionnaires is unclear.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and patients: </strong>Prospective observational cohort conducted at a tertiary medical center. We enrolled patient-participants who were treated for respiratory failure, shock, and/or sepsis and their well-chosen surrogates.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>We assessed patient-participant physical function anchored on the 4 weeks before admission using the virtual Short Physical Performance Battery (vSPPB); Strength, Assistance in Walking, Rising from a Chair, Climbing Stairs, Falls (SARC-F) questionnaire; and Fatigue, Resistance, Ambulation, Illness, and Loss of weight (FRAIL) questionnaire completed by both patient and surrogate participants. The primary outcome was agreement between patient and surrogate responses on composite scores from each questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included correlations between patient and surrogate responses, and the relationship between surrogate and patient responses. We enrolled 75 patient-surrogate dyads. Patient-participants had a median (interquartile range) age of 61 (52-69), a Charlson Comorbidity Index of 2 (1-2), and a baseline activities of daily living disability score of 3 (1-7). Most surrogates were spouses (68%), who spent an average of 20 hours per day (12-24 hr/d) with patients. We found fair agreement between patient and surrogate scores on the vSPPB (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC], 0.52; 95% CI, 0.31-0.69), SARC-F (ICC, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.22-0.60), and FRAIL (ICC, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.24-0.63). We found moderate correlation between patient and surrogate scores on the vSPPB, SARC-F, and FRAIL (Spearman r 0.60, 0.46, and 0.53, respectively [p < 0.001]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found fair agreement and moderate correlation on previously validated self-report questionnaires of physical function. Patients reported better function than their surrogates particularly at lower levels of function. Our findings highlight the need for further development of tools to assess pre-critical illness physical function.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145965612","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-14DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000007025
Matthew R Abbott, Kayla P Carpenter, Samrah Razi, Charles W Goss, Joanna Buss, Matthew Keller, Patrick G Lyons, Mario Castro, James G Krings
Objectives: The evidence supporting the use of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) during severe asthma exacerbations is limited. We determined the annual trend in NPPV use, endotracheal intubations, and in-hospital mortality among all hospitalizations for an asthma exacerbation. We additionally evaluated the association between NPPV use and subsequent endotracheal intubation and in-hospital mortality.
Setting: Administrative data from Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's State Inpatient Databases for New York and Florida, 2006-2019.
Patients: Patients 5-80 years old hospitalized with an asthma exacerbation.
Interventions: Receipt of NPPV.
Measurements and main results: Among 296,788 hospitalizations for an asthma exacerbation between 2006 and 2018, NPPV use for an asthma exacerbation increased from 1.2% to 7.4% (absolute difference, 6.1%; 95% CI, 5.6-6.7%) in adults and from 0.7% to 7.1% (absolute difference, 6.4%; 95% CI, 5.5-7.3%) in pediatric patients. Among 41,902 ICU encounters, we propensity-score matched 1,972 adult and 1,622 pediatric patients who received NPPV with 6,510 adults and 4,766 pediatric patients who did not receive NPPV. NPPV use was associated with a decreased risk of subsequent intubation (risk ratio [RR], 0.48; 95% CI, 0.40-0.57) and improved in-hospital mortality (RR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.21-0.54) in adults. In pediatric patients, use of NPPV was associated with a decreased risk of intubation (RR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.29-0.89), but not significant for an improvement in in-hospital mortality (RR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.15-1.11).
Conclusions: NPPV use for asthma exacerbations has increased. In adult and pediatric patients, NPPV use for an asthma exacerbation was associated with a decreased risk of endotracheal intubation. Furthermore, NPPV use for an asthma exacerbation was associated with improved in-hospital mortality in adult patients.
{"title":"Association Between Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation Use and Clinical Outcomes During a Severe Asthma Exacerbation: A Cohort Study.","authors":"Matthew R Abbott, Kayla P Carpenter, Samrah Razi, Charles W Goss, Joanna Buss, Matthew Keller, Patrick G Lyons, Mario Castro, James G Krings","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000007025","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000007025","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The evidence supporting the use of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) during severe asthma exacerbations is limited. We determined the annual trend in NPPV use, endotracheal intubations, and in-hospital mortality among all hospitalizations for an asthma exacerbation. We additionally evaluated the association between NPPV use and subsequent endotracheal intubation and in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective, propensity-score-matched cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Administrative data from Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's State Inpatient Databases for New York and Florida, 2006-2019.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients 5-80 years old hospitalized with an asthma exacerbation.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Receipt of NPPV.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Among 296,788 hospitalizations for an asthma exacerbation between 2006 and 2018, NPPV use for an asthma exacerbation increased from 1.2% to 7.4% (absolute difference, 6.1%; 95% CI, 5.6-6.7%) in adults and from 0.7% to 7.1% (absolute difference, 6.4%; 95% CI, 5.5-7.3%) in pediatric patients. Among 41,902 ICU encounters, we propensity-score matched 1,972 adult and 1,622 pediatric patients who received NPPV with 6,510 adults and 4,766 pediatric patients who did not receive NPPV. NPPV use was associated with a decreased risk of subsequent intubation (risk ratio [RR], 0.48; 95% CI, 0.40-0.57) and improved in-hospital mortality (RR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.21-0.54) in adults. In pediatric patients, use of NPPV was associated with a decreased risk of intubation (RR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.29-0.89), but not significant for an improvement in in-hospital mortality (RR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.15-1.11).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NPPV use for asthma exacerbations has increased. In adult and pediatric patients, NPPV use for an asthma exacerbation was associated with a decreased risk of endotracheal intubation. Furthermore, NPPV use for an asthma exacerbation was associated with improved in-hospital mortality in adult patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145965565","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objectives: Evaluate the predictive and prognostic performance of the Phoenix Sepsis Criteria (PSC) and Phoenix Sepsis Score (PSS) compared with International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference (IPSCC) criteria and other organ dysfunction scores in children admitted to the PICU with suspected infection.
Design: Multicenter, prospective cohort study.
Setting: Eight PICUs within the Italian Network of PICU Study Group (TIPNet).
Patients: Patients younger than 18 years admitted with suspected infection (from February 2022 to April 2024).
Interventions: None.
Measurements and main results: Vital signs, organ dysfunction markers, and organ support requirements were collected during day 1 and day 2 of PICU admission. Sepsis was assessed using IPSCC criteria and PSC. IPSCC Severe Sepsis, PSS, Phoenix-8, Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction-2 (PELOD-2), pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, and Pediatric Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score were calculated as organ dysfunction scores. Sepsis criteria predictive performance was assessed using sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV). Organ dysfunction scores prognostic performance was assessed using the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC). Primary outcome was PICU mortality. Among 687 patients, PSC showed higher predictive performance than IPSCC sepsis criteria, with improved sensitivity and PPV for mortality on day 1 (PSC: sensitivity, 96.4%; 95% CI, 95.0-97.8%; PPV, 7.6%; 95% CI, 5.6-9.6% and IPSCC: sensitivity, 82.1%; 95% CI, 79.3-85.0%; PPV, 6.2%; 95% CI, 4.4-8.0%) and day 2 (PSC: sensitivity, 100.0%; 95% CI, 100.0-100.0%; PPV, 10.0%; 95% CI, 7.6-12.5% and IPSCC: sensitivity, 75.0%; 95% CI, 71.5-78.5%; PPV, 9.0%; 95% CI, 6.7-11.3%). PELOD-2 exhibited the highest AUPRC for mortality (day 1, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.26-0.63 and day 2, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.38-0.77). IPSCC Severe Sepsis score was outperformed by all other organ dysfunction scores, including PSS and Phoenix-8. All prognostic performances improved from day 1 to day 2.
Conclusions: PSC and PSS performed superior to IPSCC criteria in diagnosing and prognosticating pediatric sepsis, with improved performance at day 2 of PICU admission. This study first validated PSC and PSS in a European cohort.
{"title":"Predictive and Prognostic Performance of the Phoenix Sepsis Criteria and Phoenix Sepsis Score in PICU Patients With Suspected Infection: A Multicenter Prospective Study.","authors":"Luca Marchetto, Marco Daverio, Rosanna Comoretto, Davide Padrin, Serena Scaravetti, Giulia Bordin, Stefania Ferrario, Maria Cristina Mondardini, Enzo Picconi, Immacolata Rulli, Francesco Sacco, Pasquale Vitale, Gloria Brigiari, Luregn J Schlapbach, Kusum Menon, Dario Gregori, Angela Amigoni","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000007034","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000007034","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Evaluate the predictive and prognostic performance of the Phoenix Sepsis Criteria (PSC) and Phoenix Sepsis Score (PSS) compared with International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference (IPSCC) criteria and other organ dysfunction scores in children admitted to the PICU with suspected infection.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multicenter, prospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Eight PICUs within the Italian Network of PICU Study Group (TIPNet).</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients younger than 18 years admitted with suspected infection (from February 2022 to April 2024).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Vital signs, organ dysfunction markers, and organ support requirements were collected during day 1 and day 2 of PICU admission. Sepsis was assessed using IPSCC criteria and PSC. IPSCC Severe Sepsis, PSS, Phoenix-8, Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction-2 (PELOD-2), pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, and Pediatric Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score were calculated as organ dysfunction scores. Sepsis criteria predictive performance was assessed using sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV). Organ dysfunction scores prognostic performance was assessed using the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC). Primary outcome was PICU mortality. Among 687 patients, PSC showed higher predictive performance than IPSCC sepsis criteria, with improved sensitivity and PPV for mortality on day 1 (PSC: sensitivity, 96.4%; 95% CI, 95.0-97.8%; PPV, 7.6%; 95% CI, 5.6-9.6% and IPSCC: sensitivity, 82.1%; 95% CI, 79.3-85.0%; PPV, 6.2%; 95% CI, 4.4-8.0%) and day 2 (PSC: sensitivity, 100.0%; 95% CI, 100.0-100.0%; PPV, 10.0%; 95% CI, 7.6-12.5% and IPSCC: sensitivity, 75.0%; 95% CI, 71.5-78.5%; PPV, 9.0%; 95% CI, 6.7-11.3%). PELOD-2 exhibited the highest AUPRC for mortality (day 1, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.26-0.63 and day 2, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.38-0.77). IPSCC Severe Sepsis score was outperformed by all other organ dysfunction scores, including PSS and Phoenix-8. All prognostic performances improved from day 1 to day 2.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PSC and PSS performed superior to IPSCC criteria in diagnosing and prognosticating pediatric sepsis, with improved performance at day 2 of PICU admission. This study first validated PSC and PSS in a European cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145964648","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}