Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-11-27DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006948
Erica Andrist, Andrew Kiragu, Matthew P Kirschen, Kenya Agarwal, Thaddeus M Pope, Christian J Vercler, Kate M Saylor, Heidi R Flori, Christopher L Carroll
Objectives: To characterize experiences with family contestation of brain death/death by neurologic criteria (BD/DNC) and collate strategies for navigating contested cases.
Data sources: PubMed, EMBASE, PsychInfo (EBSCO), Scopus, CINAHL Complete (EBSCO), and Web of Science were searched in consultation with an informationist for terms related to BD/DNC and contestation. The search was updated through January 2025.
Study selection: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews methodology was used. Eligible manuscripts detailed experiences with a contested BD/DNC case(s). Empirical research examining clinical or legal aspects of BD/DNC contestation was eligible, as were professional society guidelines. Two authors independently screened abstracts and full texts. Exclusion criteria included fictionalized cases, case commentaries from authors without direct involvement in the case, publications before 2014, and cases involving pregnant patients.
Data extraction: We created a data extraction tool in Covidence to organize and store data.
Data synthesis: We screened 10,577 abstracts and identified 26 eligible publications, including eight case reports or case series, 13 research studies, and five professional society guidelines or position papers. Twenty publications came from the United States. The circumstances of BD/DNC contestation varied, ranging from hours-long requests to permit the arrival of family members to protracted litigation. Primary teams consulted multidisciplinary personnel when conflict arose, including palliative care, ethics, social work, legal, hospital chaplaincy, and community religious support. However, few details were provided regarding the perceived utility of these services. Clinicians and hospital personnel desired concrete institutional and legal guidance for addressing contestation.
Conclusions: Clinicians report encountering BD/DNC contestation. Detailed, flexible management approaches are necessary, but data and recommendations to guide management are lacking. Understanding optimal responses is impeded by the variable circumstances and family actions that are described as contestation. Adequately developing and disseminating management strategies will require consistent definitions and usage of key terms, as well as additional multidisciplinary and participatory scholarship.
目的:通过神经学标准(BD/DNC)描述脑死亡/死亡家庭争论的经历,并整理处理争议病例的策略。数据来源:PubMed, EMBASE, PsychInfo (EBSCO), Scopus, CINAHL Complete (EBSCO)和Web of Science,咨询了一位信息专家,搜索了与BD/DNC和争论相关的术语。搜索更新到2025年1月。研究选择:系统评价的首选报告项目和荟萃分析扩展了范围评价方法。合格的手稿详细描述了有争议的BD/DNC案例的经验。检查BD/DNC争论的临床或法律方面的实证研究是合格的,专业协会指南也是合格的。两位作者独立筛选摘要和全文。排除标准包括虚构病例、未直接参与病例的作者的病例评论、2014年以前的出版物以及涉及孕妇的病例。数据提取:我们创建了一个数据提取工具,用于组织和存储数据。数据综合:我们筛选了10,577篇摘要,并确定了26篇符合条件的出版物,包括8篇病例报告或病例系列,13篇研究报告和5篇专业协会指南或立场文件。20份出版物来自美国。BD和DNC之间的争论情况各不相同,有的长达数小时的请求允许家属到来,有的旷日持久的诉讼。当冲突出现时,初级小组咨询多学科人员,包括姑息治疗、伦理、社会工作、法律、医院牧师和社区宗教支持。但是,没有提供关于这些服务的实际效用的详细信息。临床医生和医院工作人员需要解决争议的具体制度和法律指导。结论:临床医生报告遇到BD/DNC争议。详细、灵活的管理方法是必要的,但缺乏指导管理的数据和建议。理解最佳的反应是由可变的环境和家庭行为,被描述为争论的阻碍。适当地制订和传播管理战略将需要关键术语的一致定义和使用,以及更多的多学科和参与性奖学金。
{"title":"Brain Death Contestation: A Scoping Review of Its Incidence and Management.","authors":"Erica Andrist, Andrew Kiragu, Matthew P Kirschen, Kenya Agarwal, Thaddeus M Pope, Christian J Vercler, Kate M Saylor, Heidi R Flori, Christopher L Carroll","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006948","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006948","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To characterize experiences with family contestation of brain death/death by neurologic criteria (BD/DNC) and collate strategies for navigating contested cases.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed, EMBASE, PsychInfo (EBSCO), Scopus, CINAHL Complete (EBSCO), and Web of Science were searched in consultation with an informationist for terms related to BD/DNC and contestation. The search was updated through January 2025.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews methodology was used. Eligible manuscripts detailed experiences with a contested BD/DNC case(s). Empirical research examining clinical or legal aspects of BD/DNC contestation was eligible, as were professional society guidelines. Two authors independently screened abstracts and full texts. Exclusion criteria included fictionalized cases, case commentaries from authors without direct involvement in the case, publications before 2014, and cases involving pregnant patients.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>We created a data extraction tool in Covidence to organize and store data.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>We screened 10,577 abstracts and identified 26 eligible publications, including eight case reports or case series, 13 research studies, and five professional society guidelines or position papers. Twenty publications came from the United States. The circumstances of BD/DNC contestation varied, ranging from hours-long requests to permit the arrival of family members to protracted litigation. Primary teams consulted multidisciplinary personnel when conflict arose, including palliative care, ethics, social work, legal, hospital chaplaincy, and community religious support. However, few details were provided regarding the perceived utility of these services. Clinicians and hospital personnel desired concrete institutional and legal guidance for addressing contestation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinicians report encountering BD/DNC contestation. Detailed, flexible management approaches are necessary, but data and recommendations to guide management are lacking. Understanding optimal responses is impeded by the variable circumstances and family actions that are described as contestation. Adequately developing and disseminating management strategies will require consistent definitions and usage of key terms, as well as additional multidisciplinary and participatory scholarship.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"154-162"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145631097","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2026-01-06DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006918
Xingyue Feng, Xinyu Nie, Can Xu
{"title":"Severe Hyperoxia on Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Oxygen Toxicity or Marker of Advanced Left Ventricular Failure?","authors":"Xingyue Feng, Xinyu Nie, Can Xu","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006918","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006918","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":"54 1","pages":"214-216"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145910699","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-11-07DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006931
Yu Tong L Lu, Shaurya Taran, Eddy Fan, Victoria A McCredie, Federico Angriman, Irene Telias, Thiago Bassi, Jeffrey M Singh
Objectives: Differences in mechanical ventilation strategies between patients with and without acute brain injury (ABI) remain incompletely characterized. We aimed to compare ventilation approaches in patients with and without ABI over a 10-year period and to investigate impacts of practice changes on Pa o2 and Pa co2 .
Design: Retrospective registry-based cohort study involving prospectively collected data from nine ICUs across Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Setting and patients: Adult patients (≥ 18 yr) receiving invasive ventilation for at least 48 hours from 2014 to 2023 were included. Patients were classified as having ABI (exposure) or non-ABI (comparator) conditions. Between-group differences in tidal volume (V t ), positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), Pa co2 , and Pa o2 were summarized using adjusted linear mixed-effects regression. Six additional ventilation and gas exchange variables were evaluated in unadjusted analyses.
Interventions: None.
Measurements and main results: Thirteen thousand nine hundred twenty-five patients were included. Mean age ( sd ) was 59.1 years (17.5 yr), 38.1% of patients ( n = 5305) were female, and 25.2% had ABI ( n = 3503). Over the first 7 ventilation days, V t was comparable between groups, with a daily median close to 6 mL/kg (interquartile range, 6-7 mL/kg) predicted body weight. PEEP was significantly lower in patients with ABI (median 5 vs. 8 cm H 2 O in non-ABI patients; p < 0.001). Among patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure, PEEP remained significantly lower in the ABI subset. From 2014 to 2023, V t decreased slightly in both groups, while PEEP remained unchanged. Pa co2 was largely maintained within 35-45 mm Hg in ABI patients and Pa o2 remained largely within 80-120 mm Hg. Differences in six additional ventilation parameters between groups were minimal.
Conclusions: Both ABI and non-ABI patients received comparable V t that trended downwards over time. Pa co2 and Pa o2 remained largely within guideline-recommended ranges. However, PEEP was significantly lower in ABI patients, including among those with hypoxemic respiratory failure, highlighting potential opportunities to improve PEEP application in relevant subsets.
目的:急性脑损伤(ABI)患者和非急性脑损伤患者在机械通气策略上的差异尚未完全确定。我们的目的是比较10年期间ABI患者和非ABI患者的通气方法,并研究实践改变对Pao2和Paco2的影响。设计:回顾性登记队列研究,前瞻性收集来自加拿大安大略省多伦多9个icu的数据。环境和患者:纳入2014年至2023年接受有创通气至少48小时的成人患者(≥18岁)。患者被分为ABI(暴露)和非ABI(比较者)两类。采用调整后的线性混合效应回归,总结潮气量(Vt)、呼气末正压(PEEP)、Paco2和Pao2的组间差异。在未调整分析中评估了六个额外的通风和气体交换变量。干预措施:没有。测量和主要结果:纳入13925例患者。平均年龄(sd)为59.1岁(17.5岁),女性占38.1% (n = 5305), ABI占25.2% (n = 3503)。在前7个通气天内,各组间Vt具有可比性,每日中位数接近6 mL/kg(四分位数范围为6-7 mL/kg)预测体重。ABI患者的PEEP明显低于非ABI患者(中位数为5 cm H2O vs 8 cm H2O; p < 0.001)。在低氧性呼吸衰竭患者中,ABI亚群的PEEP仍明显较低。2014 - 2023年,两组Vt均略有下降,PEEP保持不变。ABI患者Paco2基本维持在35-45 mm Hg, Pao2基本维持在80-120 mm Hg。两组间6个额外通气参数的差异很小。结论:ABI患者和非ABI患者的Vt均随时间呈下降趋势。Paco2和Pao2基本保持在指南推荐的范围内。然而,ABI患者(包括低氧性呼吸衰竭患者)的PEEP明显较低,这突出了在相关亚群中改善PEEP应用的潜在机会。
{"title":"Approaches to Mechanical Ventilation in Patients With and Without Acute Brain Injury: A Registry-Based Cohort Study.","authors":"Yu Tong L Lu, Shaurya Taran, Eddy Fan, Victoria A McCredie, Federico Angriman, Irene Telias, Thiago Bassi, Jeffrey M Singh","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006931","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006931","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Differences in mechanical ventilation strategies between patients with and without acute brain injury (ABI) remain incompletely characterized. We aimed to compare ventilation approaches in patients with and without ABI over a 10-year period and to investigate impacts of practice changes on Pa o2 and Pa co2 .</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective registry-based cohort study involving prospectively collected data from nine ICUs across Toronto, Ontario, Canada.</p><p><strong>Setting and patients: </strong>Adult patients (≥ 18 yr) receiving invasive ventilation for at least 48 hours from 2014 to 2023 were included. Patients were classified as having ABI (exposure) or non-ABI (comparator) conditions. Between-group differences in tidal volume (V t ), positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), Pa co2 , and Pa o2 were summarized using adjusted linear mixed-effects regression. Six additional ventilation and gas exchange variables were evaluated in unadjusted analyses.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Thirteen thousand nine hundred twenty-five patients were included. Mean age ( sd ) was 59.1 years (17.5 yr), 38.1% of patients ( n = 5305) were female, and 25.2% had ABI ( n = 3503). Over the first 7 ventilation days, V t was comparable between groups, with a daily median close to 6 mL/kg (interquartile range, 6-7 mL/kg) predicted body weight. PEEP was significantly lower in patients with ABI (median 5 vs. 8 cm H 2 O in non-ABI patients; p < 0.001). Among patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure, PEEP remained significantly lower in the ABI subset. From 2014 to 2023, V t decreased slightly in both groups, while PEEP remained unchanged. Pa co2 was largely maintained within 35-45 mm Hg in ABI patients and Pa o2 remained largely within 80-120 mm Hg. Differences in six additional ventilation parameters between groups were minimal.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both ABI and non-ABI patients received comparable V t that trended downwards over time. Pa co2 and Pa o2 remained largely within guideline-recommended ranges. However, PEEP was significantly lower in ABI patients, including among those with hypoxemic respiratory failure, highlighting potential opportunities to improve PEEP application in relevant subsets.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145457706","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-11-12DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006936
Zhi Geng, Allyson M Hynes, Alexis M Moren, Jason D Christie, Nilam S Mangalmurti, Pengxiang Li, John J Gallagher, Benjamin S Abella, Jason J Nam, Daniela Schmulevich, Avery B Nathens, Patrick M Reilly, David H Zonies, Lewis J Kaplan, Jeremy W Cannon
Objectives: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) represents a significant complication in trauma patients. Yet the epidemiology of ARDS in trauma remains incompletely characterized. We sought to define trends in ARDS frequency and the effect of temporal, patient, and center-level factors on outcomes with the hypothesis that ARDS independently predicts mortality.
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Setting: Hospitals submitting data to the American College of Surgeons National Trauma Data Bank.
Patients: Injured patients 18 years old or older from 2007 to 2019 on mechanical ventilation (MV) for greater than or equal to 2 days were included, and patients with ARDS were compared with those without ARDS. A subgroup with transfusion data was also identified. Multivariable logistic regression models by year adjusted for patient demographics, center characteristics, and blood products identified factors independently associated with ARDS diagnosis and 30-day hospital mortality.
Interventions: None.
Measurements and main results: Of 384,032 injured patients on MV, ARDS was documented in 29,359 (8 per 100 MV patients) with a significant decrease over the study period (22 in 2007 vs. 3 in 2019, p < 0.001). Patient-level risk factors independently associated with ARDS were blunt injury (odds ratio [OR] 1.25; 95% CI, 1.20-1.30), severe sepsis (OR 2.16; 95% CI, 2.06-2.27), ventilator-associated pneumonia (OR 2.91; 95% CI, 2.82-3.00), and acute kidney injury (AKI, OR 2.98; 95% CI, 2.85 to 3.12). In the transfusion subset, 24-hour plasma (OR 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.04) and platelets (OR 1.03; 95% CI, 1.02-1.05) were independently associated with ARDS. Crude ARDS mortality increased over the study period (2007, 15.1% vs. 2019, 29.7%, p < 0.001), and after adjusting for significant differences, ARDS was independently associated with 30-day hospital mortality (OR 1.32; 95% CI, 1.27-1.37). Independent risk factors for 30-day mortality in patients with ARDS included head injury (OR 1.54; 95% CI, 1.43-1.66), severe sepsis (OR 1.48; 95% CI, 1.34-1.63), and AKI (OR 2.72; 95% CI, 2.50-2.96). Patients with ARDS managed in Prevention and Early Treatment of Acute Lung Injury and the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization centers were less likely to die (OR 0.78; 95% CI, 0.72-0.84).
Conclusions: From 2007 to 2019, ARDS decreased significantly in trauma patients. Over the same time, mortality increased to nearly 30%, and after adjusting for other risks factors, ARDS was strongly associated with 30-day mortality. Future studies should examine modifiable patient and center-level factors to improve mortality in these high-risk patients.
{"title":"Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Trauma 2007-2019: Comprehensive Patient and Center-Level Retrospective Cohort Analysis.","authors":"Zhi Geng, Allyson M Hynes, Alexis M Moren, Jason D Christie, Nilam S Mangalmurti, Pengxiang Li, John J Gallagher, Benjamin S Abella, Jason J Nam, Daniela Schmulevich, Avery B Nathens, Patrick M Reilly, David H Zonies, Lewis J Kaplan, Jeremy W Cannon","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006936","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006936","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) represents a significant complication in trauma patients. Yet the epidemiology of ARDS in trauma remains incompletely characterized. We sought to define trends in ARDS frequency and the effect of temporal, patient, and center-level factors on outcomes with the hypothesis that ARDS independently predicts mortality.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Hospitals submitting data to the American College of Surgeons National Trauma Data Bank.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Injured patients 18 years old or older from 2007 to 2019 on mechanical ventilation (MV) for greater than or equal to 2 days were included, and patients with ARDS were compared with those without ARDS. A subgroup with transfusion data was also identified. Multivariable logistic regression models by year adjusted for patient demographics, center characteristics, and blood products identified factors independently associated with ARDS diagnosis and 30-day hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Of 384,032 injured patients on MV, ARDS was documented in 29,359 (8 per 100 MV patients) with a significant decrease over the study period (22 in 2007 vs. 3 in 2019, p < 0.001). Patient-level risk factors independently associated with ARDS were blunt injury (odds ratio [OR] 1.25; 95% CI, 1.20-1.30), severe sepsis (OR 2.16; 95% CI, 2.06-2.27), ventilator-associated pneumonia (OR 2.91; 95% CI, 2.82-3.00), and acute kidney injury (AKI, OR 2.98; 95% CI, 2.85 to 3.12). In the transfusion subset, 24-hour plasma (OR 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.04) and platelets (OR 1.03; 95% CI, 1.02-1.05) were independently associated with ARDS. Crude ARDS mortality increased over the study period (2007, 15.1% vs. 2019, 29.7%, p < 0.001), and after adjusting for significant differences, ARDS was independently associated with 30-day hospital mortality (OR 1.32; 95% CI, 1.27-1.37). Independent risk factors for 30-day mortality in patients with ARDS included head injury (OR 1.54; 95% CI, 1.43-1.66), severe sepsis (OR 1.48; 95% CI, 1.34-1.63), and AKI (OR 2.72; 95% CI, 2.50-2.96). Patients with ARDS managed in Prevention and Early Treatment of Acute Lung Injury and the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization centers were less likely to die (OR 0.78; 95% CI, 0.72-0.84).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>From 2007 to 2019, ARDS decreased significantly in trauma patients. Over the same time, mortality increased to nearly 30%, and after adjusting for other risks factors, ARDS was strongly associated with 30-day mortality. Future studies should examine modifiable patient and center-level factors to improve mortality in these high-risk patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"76-86"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145494953","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-11-21DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006939
Parth Shirode, Tara Beck, Dana Y Fuhrman, Angelina Magreni Dixon, Minh Tran, Jonathan H Pelletier, Patricia Raimer, Matthew L Paden, Poyyapakkam Srivaths, Aadil Kakajiwala, Khalid Alhasan, Timothy Bunchman, Rupesh Raina
Objectives: To evaluate the current evidence, clinical indications, methodologies, outcomes, and challenges associated with tandem extracorporeal blood purification/support therapies (EBP/STs) in critically ill children.
Data sources: A literature review of peer-reviewed articles, clinical guidelines, and existing literature related to continuous renal replacement therapy, therapeutic plasma exchange, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and their concurrent use in critically ill children.
Study selection: Studies were included if they described tandem use of EBP/ST modalities in children, including case series, observational studies, and expert reviews. Studies focusing exclusively on adult populations or single modality therapy were excluded.
Data extraction: Key data points extracted were patient population, clinical indication for tandem therapy, type and sequence of EBP/ST modality used, reported outcomes, and complications. Emphasis was placed on child-specific applications, safety profiles, and treatment protocols.
Data synthesis: Tandem EBP/ST are increasingly used to treat children with complex conditions such as sepsis-induced multiple organ failure, acute liver failure, and thrombocytopenia-associated multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. This review synthesizes the reported risks, benefits, and proposed protocols for tandem therapy use in PICUs. Benefits include reduced procedural downtime, optimized vascular access, and enhanced therapeutic efficiency. However, tandem therapies remain off-label, with widely variable clinical protocols, lack of children-specific guidelines, and increased risk of complications such as hypocalcemia and hemodynamic instability, limiting their widespread adoption.
Conclusions: Tandem EBP/STs remain an emerging but incompletely standardized intervention in pediatric critical care. While they offer potential benefits such as improved procedural efficiency and reduced vascular access requirements, their use is limited by heterogeneous protocols, off-label application, and risk of complications. Efforts toward developing standardized guidelines, enhancing multidisciplinary training, and establishing multicenter registries may help optimize their safe and effective use in critically ill children.
{"title":"Tandem Extracorporeal Blood Purification/Support Therapies in Critically Ill Children: A Literature Review.","authors":"Parth Shirode, Tara Beck, Dana Y Fuhrman, Angelina Magreni Dixon, Minh Tran, Jonathan H Pelletier, Patricia Raimer, Matthew L Paden, Poyyapakkam Srivaths, Aadil Kakajiwala, Khalid Alhasan, Timothy Bunchman, Rupesh Raina","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006939","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006939","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the current evidence, clinical indications, methodologies, outcomes, and challenges associated with tandem extracorporeal blood purification/support therapies (EBP/STs) in critically ill children.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A literature review of peer-reviewed articles, clinical guidelines, and existing literature related to continuous renal replacement therapy, therapeutic plasma exchange, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and their concurrent use in critically ill children.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Studies were included if they described tandem use of EBP/ST modalities in children, including case series, observational studies, and expert reviews. Studies focusing exclusively on adult populations or single modality therapy were excluded.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Key data points extracted were patient population, clinical indication for tandem therapy, type and sequence of EBP/ST modality used, reported outcomes, and complications. Emphasis was placed on child-specific applications, safety profiles, and treatment protocols.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>Tandem EBP/ST are increasingly used to treat children with complex conditions such as sepsis-induced multiple organ failure, acute liver failure, and thrombocytopenia-associated multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. This review synthesizes the reported risks, benefits, and proposed protocols for tandem therapy use in PICUs. Benefits include reduced procedural downtime, optimized vascular access, and enhanced therapeutic efficiency. However, tandem therapies remain off-label, with widely variable clinical protocols, lack of children-specific guidelines, and increased risk of complications such as hypocalcemia and hemodynamic instability, limiting their widespread adoption.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Tandem EBP/STs remain an emerging but incompletely standardized intervention in pediatric critical care. While they offer potential benefits such as improved procedural efficiency and reduced vascular access requirements, their use is limited by heterogeneous protocols, off-label application, and risk of complications. Efforts toward developing standardized guidelines, enhancing multidisciplinary training, and establishing multicenter registries may help optimize their safe and effective use in critically ill children.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"163-174"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145899375","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-11-21DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006973
Lama Nazer, Andre C Kalil
{"title":"What Impacts Sepsis Outcomes in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Antibiotic Timing, Presence of Shock, or Supportive Care?","authors":"Lama Nazer, Andre C Kalil","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006973","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006973","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"190-192"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145563026","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-11-13DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006933
Robert J Flick, Lee A Kamphuis, Thomas S Valley, Mari Armstrong-Hough, Theodore J Iwashyna
Objectives: Determine if previously described sepsis survivor subtypes can be applied outside of their derivation cohort using a parsimonious algorithm. Test the association between subtype and the primary outcome of 3-month mortality, and secondary outcomes of readmission, physical function, and health-related quality of life through 1 year of follow-up.
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Setting: Participants enrolled in the Crystalloid Liberal or Vasopressors Early Resuscitation in Sepsis (CLOVERS) trial, a multisite trial in the United States that enrolled patients with sepsis-induced hypotension.
Patients: All participants who were alive on day 28 after enrollment and had nonmissing data for outcome and subtype-defining variables (Charlson Comorbidity Index, length of stay, discharge destination). Participants were retrospectively assigned at time of discharge to one of five previously derived survivor subtypes: low risk, healthy with severe disease, multimorbidity, low functional status, and unhealthy baseline with severe disease.
Interventions: None.
Measurements and main results: Of 1563 participants, 1368 were eligible and assigned a subtype. Three-month mortality was 13.1% and varied significantly between subtypes (5.1-45.5%; p < 0.001). In age-adjusted logistic regression, odds ratios for 3-month mortality were 11.1 in the low functional status and 9.7 in the unhealthy baseline with severe illness subtypes, compared with the low-risk subtype ( p < 0.001). Participant subtype was a significant predictor of 6- and 12-month EuroQol 5D five level score and limitations in activities of daily living, but not readmission.
Conclusions: Sepsis survivor subtypes that are readily identifiable at hospital discharge are significantly associated with mortality at 3 months, and patient-important outcomes through 12 months. Using subtypes to predict a patient's risk of adverse outcomes could aid the discharge planning and recovery process.
{"title":"Association of Sepsis Survivor Subtypes With Long-Term Mortality and Disability After Discharge: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Robert J Flick, Lee A Kamphuis, Thomas S Valley, Mari Armstrong-Hough, Theodore J Iwashyna","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006933","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006933","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Determine if previously described sepsis survivor subtypes can be applied outside of their derivation cohort using a parsimonious algorithm. Test the association between subtype and the primary outcome of 3-month mortality, and secondary outcomes of readmission, physical function, and health-related quality of life through 1 year of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Participants enrolled in the Crystalloid Liberal or Vasopressors Early Resuscitation in Sepsis (CLOVERS) trial, a multisite trial in the United States that enrolled patients with sepsis-induced hypotension.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>All participants who were alive on day 28 after enrollment and had nonmissing data for outcome and subtype-defining variables (Charlson Comorbidity Index, length of stay, discharge destination). Participants were retrospectively assigned at time of discharge to one of five previously derived survivor subtypes: low risk, healthy with severe disease, multimorbidity, low functional status, and unhealthy baseline with severe disease.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Of 1563 participants, 1368 were eligible and assigned a subtype. Three-month mortality was 13.1% and varied significantly between subtypes (5.1-45.5%; p < 0.001). In age-adjusted logistic regression, odds ratios for 3-month mortality were 11.1 in the low functional status and 9.7 in the unhealthy baseline with severe illness subtypes, compared with the low-risk subtype ( p < 0.001). Participant subtype was a significant predictor of 6- and 12-month EuroQol 5D five level score and limitations in activities of daily living, but not readmission.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sepsis survivor subtypes that are readily identifiable at hospital discharge are significantly associated with mortality at 3 months, and patient-important outcomes through 12 months. Using subtypes to predict a patient's risk of adverse outcomes could aid the discharge planning and recovery process.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"45-54"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145502601","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2026-01-06DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006977
Jeffrey Wang, Joseph E Tonna, Jacob C Jentzer
{"title":"The authors reply.","authors":"Jeffrey Wang, Joseph E Tonna, Jacob C Jentzer","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006977","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006977","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":"54 1","pages":"216-217"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145910729","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2026-01-06DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006976
Mohammad Azizmalayeri, Nicolette F de Keizer, Fabian Termorshuizen, Ameen Abu-Hanna, Giovanni Cinà
{"title":"The authors reply.","authors":"Mohammad Azizmalayeri, Nicolette F de Keizer, Fabian Termorshuizen, Ameen Abu-Hanna, Giovanni Cinà","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006976","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006976","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":"54 1","pages":"212-213"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145910779","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-10-31DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006935
Allyson M Hynes, Thomas W Carver, Oluwafemi P Owodunni, Shyam Murali, Frederick L Gmora, Samuel A Tisherman, Niels D Martin
Objectives: Emergency medicine (EM) surgical critical care (SCC) trained physicians offer many advantages to SCC. However, several fields of critical care (CC) compete with SCC for EM intensivists. We hypothesized that there are definable and potentially modifiable factors related to the pathway selection.
Design: Cross-sectional survey.
Setting: Four national EM societies.
Subjects: EM trainees (residents and fellows).
Interventions: None.
Measurements and main results: The primary outcome included the top factors leading to pathway selection. Secondary outcomes included influential factors for entering CC and individual components of a CC fellowship that interest the EM trainee. One hundred eleven EM trainees responded-42 fellows and 69 residents. Median age was 32 (interquartile range, 30-35). Sixty-seven were matched (fellows + matched residents). Intended fields of practice: 49 anesthesiology CC (26 matched), 58 medicine CC (29 matched), two neurology CC (1 matched), six resuscitation (one matched), 15 SCC (eight matched), and five non-CC (two matched). Top factors for pathway selection included exposure to specialty units, geography and specialty multidisciplinary teams ( p < 0.05). Ease of board certification was not influential. Only 28% of trainees had exposure to EM-SCC fellowships at their residency institution and only 42% had exposure to surgical intensivists during training. However, 41% envisioned practicing in a surgical ICU. Before application season, 8.2% did not have exposure to a surgical ICU/trauma ICU/trauma service that managed their ICU patients in contrast to the 3.2% of applicants not having medical ICU exposure. The highest-ranking factor for entering CC was intellectual appeal over job opportunities and lifestyle ( p < 0.05). When assessing components of individual fellowship programs, CC knowledge, the institutional value of EM/critical care medicine, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation exposure ranked highly.
Conclusions: Given the complexity of the modifiable barriers for EM-SCC matriculation, a multifaceted approach is necessary to increase matriculants. Interventions specific to the specialty are required at professional societal, institutional, and training program levels.
{"title":"Attracting Emergency Medicine-Trained Residents to Surgical Critical Care: The Implications From a Nationwide Survey of Emergency Medicine Trainees Interested in Critical Care.","authors":"Allyson M Hynes, Thomas W Carver, Oluwafemi P Owodunni, Shyam Murali, Frederick L Gmora, Samuel A Tisherman, Niels D Martin","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006935","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006935","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Emergency medicine (EM) surgical critical care (SCC) trained physicians offer many advantages to SCC. However, several fields of critical care (CC) compete with SCC for EM intensivists. We hypothesized that there are definable and potentially modifiable factors related to the pathway selection.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional survey.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Four national EM societies.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>EM trainees (residents and fellows).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>The primary outcome included the top factors leading to pathway selection. Secondary outcomes included influential factors for entering CC and individual components of a CC fellowship that interest the EM trainee. One hundred eleven EM trainees responded-42 fellows and 69 residents. Median age was 32 (interquartile range, 30-35). Sixty-seven were matched (fellows + matched residents). Intended fields of practice: 49 anesthesiology CC (26 matched), 58 medicine CC (29 matched), two neurology CC (1 matched), six resuscitation (one matched), 15 SCC (eight matched), and five non-CC (two matched). Top factors for pathway selection included exposure to specialty units, geography and specialty multidisciplinary teams ( p < 0.05). Ease of board certification was not influential. Only 28% of trainees had exposure to EM-SCC fellowships at their residency institution and only 42% had exposure to surgical intensivists during training. However, 41% envisioned practicing in a surgical ICU. Before application season, 8.2% did not have exposure to a surgical ICU/trauma ICU/trauma service that managed their ICU patients in contrast to the 3.2% of applicants not having medical ICU exposure. The highest-ranking factor for entering CC was intellectual appeal over job opportunities and lifestyle ( p < 0.05). When assessing components of individual fellowship programs, CC knowledge, the institutional value of EM/critical care medicine, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation exposure ranked highly.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given the complexity of the modifiable barriers for EM-SCC matriculation, a multifaceted approach is necessary to increase matriculants. Interventions specific to the specialty are required at professional societal, institutional, and training program levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"66-75"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145421315","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}