Jennifer Jou, Idan Gabdank, Yunhai Luo, Khine Lin, Paul Sud, Zachary Myers, Jason A. Hilton, Meenakshi S. Kagda, Bonita Lam, Emma O'Neill, Philip Adenekan, Keenan Graham, Ulugbek K. Baymuradov, Stuart R. Miyasato, J. Seth Strattan, Otto Jolanki, Jin-Wook Lee, Casey Litton, Forrest Y. Tanaka, Benjamin C. Hitz, J. Michael Cherry
Cover: In Prandi and Demichelis (https://doi.org/10.1002/cpbi.81), the image shows a cartoon of the computation of beta and allelic fraction of informative SNPs. (A) Example of the allelic fraction (AF) and beta (β) values computed for five genomic positions (p1 to pm) corresponding to five informative SNPs. Positions p1 to pn are within a hemizygously deleted genomic segment, A, whereas genomic positions pn + 1 to pm lie within a wild-type genomic segment, B. (B to D) Examples of a normal cell and two different tumor cells. Tumor cells 1 and 2 differ in the status of genomic segment B. Histograms below the cell cartoons report the expected distribution of the AF of SNPs in genomic segments A and B together with the associated beta values. (E and F) Examples of two different tumor samples. Tumor sample 1 includes one normal cell and nine tumor cells with deleted genomic segment A and wild-type genomic segment B. Tumor sample 2 differs from tumor sample 1 in the presence of six tumor cells with a hemizygous deletion of genomic segment B. Expected distribution of the AF of informative SNPs together with estimated beta are depicted below each tumor sample cartoon.