Purpose of review: Human brain parcellation based on functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) plays an essential role in neuroscience research. By segmenting vast and intricate fMRI data into functionally similar units, researchers can better decipher the brain's structure in both healthy and diseased states. This article reviews current methodologies and ideas in this field, while also outlining the obstacles and directions for future research.
Recent findings: Traditional brain parcellation techniques, which often rely on cytoarchitectonic criteria, overlook the functional and temporal information accessible through fMRI. The adoption of machine learning techniques, notably deep learning, offers the potential to harness both spatial and temporal information for more nuanced brain segmentation. However, the search for a one-size-fits-all solution to brain segmentation is impractical, with the choice between group-level or individual-level models and the intended downstream analysis influencing the optimal parcellation strategy. Additionally, evaluating these models is complicated by our incomplete understanding of brain function and the absence of a definitive "ground truth".
Summary: While recent methodological advancements have significantly enhanced our grasp of the brain's spatial and temporal dynamics, challenges persist in advancing fMRI-based spatio-temporal representations. Future efforts will likely focus on refining model evaluation and selection as well as developing methods that offer clear interpretability for clinical usage, thereby facilitating further breakthroughs in our comprehension of the brain.
{"title":"fMRI-based spatio-temporal parcellations of the human brain.","authors":"Qinrui Ling, Aiping Liu, Yu Li, Martin J McKeown, Xun Chen","doi":"10.1097/WCO.0000000000001280","DOIUrl":"10.1097/WCO.0000000000001280","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Human brain parcellation based on functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) plays an essential role in neuroscience research. By segmenting vast and intricate fMRI data into functionally similar units, researchers can better decipher the brain's structure in both healthy and diseased states. This article reviews current methodologies and ideas in this field, while also outlining the obstacles and directions for future research.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Traditional brain parcellation techniques, which often rely on cytoarchitectonic criteria, overlook the functional and temporal information accessible through fMRI. The adoption of machine learning techniques, notably deep learning, offers the potential to harness both spatial and temporal information for more nuanced brain segmentation. However, the search for a one-size-fits-all solution to brain segmentation is impractical, with the choice between group-level or individual-level models and the intended downstream analysis influencing the optimal parcellation strategy. Additionally, evaluating these models is complicated by our incomplete understanding of brain function and the absence of a definitive \"ground truth\".</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>While recent methodological advancements have significantly enhanced our grasp of the brain's spatial and temporal dynamics, challenges persist in advancing fMRI-based spatio-temporal representations. Future efforts will likely focus on refining model evaluation and selection as well as developing methods that offer clear interpretability for clinical usage, thereby facilitating further breakthroughs in our comprehension of the brain.</p>","PeriodicalId":11059,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"369-380"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141158182","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-03-28DOI: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000001268
Samantha E Epstein, Erin E Longbrake
Purpose of review: Revisions of multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnostic criteria enable clinicians to diagnose patients earlier in the biologic disease course. Prompt initiation of therapy correlates with improved clinical outcomes. This has led to increased attention on the earliest stages of MS, including the MS prodrome and radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS). Here, we review current understanding and approach to patients with preclinical MS.
Recent findings: MS disease biology often begins well before the onset of typical MS symptoms, and we are increasingly able to recognize preclinical and prodromal stages of MS. RIS represents the best characterized aspect of preclinical MS, and its diagnostic criteria were recently revised to better capture patients at highest risk of conversion to clinical MS. The first two randomized control trials evaluating disease modifying therapy use in RIS also found that treatment could delay or prevent onset of clinical disease.
Summary: Despite progress in our understanding of the earliest stages of the MS disease course, additional research is needed to systematically identify patients with preclinical MS as well as capture those at risk for developing clinical disease. Recent data suggests that preventive immunomodulatory therapies may be beneficial for high-risk patients with RIS; though management remains controversial.
{"title":"Shifting our attention earlier in the multiple sclerosis disease course.","authors":"Samantha E Epstein, Erin E Longbrake","doi":"10.1097/WCO.0000000000001268","DOIUrl":"10.1097/WCO.0000000000001268","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Revisions of multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnostic criteria enable clinicians to diagnose patients earlier in the biologic disease course. Prompt initiation of therapy correlates with improved clinical outcomes. This has led to increased attention on the earliest stages of MS, including the MS prodrome and radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS). Here, we review current understanding and approach to patients with preclinical MS.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>MS disease biology often begins well before the onset of typical MS symptoms, and we are increasingly able to recognize preclinical and prodromal stages of MS. RIS represents the best characterized aspect of preclinical MS, and its diagnostic criteria were recently revised to better capture patients at highest risk of conversion to clinical MS. The first two randomized control trials evaluating disease modifying therapy use in RIS also found that treatment could delay or prevent onset of clinical disease.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Despite progress in our understanding of the earliest stages of the MS disease course, additional research is needed to systematically identify patients with preclinical MS as well as capture those at risk for developing clinical disease. Recent data suggests that preventive immunomodulatory therapies may be beneficial for high-risk patients with RIS; though management remains controversial.</p>","PeriodicalId":11059,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"212-219"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140305157","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-04-01DOI: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000001271
Carles Gaig, Lidia Sabater
Purpose of review: Anti-IgLON5 disease is characterized by a distinctive sleep disorder, associated with a heterogeneous spectrum of neurological symptoms. Initial autopsies showed a novel neuronal tauopathy predominantly located in the tegmentum of the brainstem. Recently, new diagnostic red flags, biomarkers predictors of response to immunotherapy, and novel insights into the autoimmune pathogenesis of the disease have been reported.
Recent findings: Patients with diagnosis of neurodegenerative dementia, progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) or with motor-neuron disease (MND)-like syndrome have been reported to have IgLON5 antibodies, which are the hallmark of anti-IgLON5 disease. Second, low levels of neurofilament light chain in serum and cerebrospinal fluid of patients at disease onset could be a predictor of immunotherapy response. Recent neuropathological studies indicate that the neuronal tau deposits occur late in the course of the disease. Moreover, IgLON5 antibodies induce cytoskeletal changes in cultured hippocampal neurons suggesting that the tauopathy could be secondary of the IgLON5 antibody effects.
Summary: Anti-IgLON5 disease can mimic and should be considered in atypical presentations of MND, neurodegenerative dementia and PSP. Neurofilament light chain levels seem promising biomarker for disease prognosis. Finally, the neuropathological and in vitro experimental studies strengthen the autoimmune hypothesis of the disease.
综述的目的:抗 IgLON5 病的特征是一种独特的睡眠障碍,伴有多种神经系统症状。最初的尸检显示,一种新型的神经元牛磺酸病主要位于脑干的被盖部。最近,新的诊断信号、预测免疫疗法反应的生物标志物以及对该病自身免疫发病机制的新见解均有报道:据报道,被诊断为神经退行性痴呆症、进行性核上性麻痹(PSP)或运动神经元病(MND)样综合征的患者体内存在 IgLON5 抗体,这是抗 IgLON5 疾病的标志。其次,发病时患者血清和脑脊液中神经丝轻链水平较低,可作为免疫疗法反应的预测指标。最近的神经病理学研究表明,神经元 tau 沉积发生在疾病的晚期。此外,IgLON5抗体可诱导培养的海马神经元发生细胞骨架变化,这表明tau病可能是继发于IgLON5抗体效应的疾病。神经丝蛋白轻链水平似乎有望成为疾病预后的生物标志物。最后,神经病理学和体外实验研究加强了该病的自身免疫假说。
{"title":"New knowledge on anti-IgLON5 disease.","authors":"Carles Gaig, Lidia Sabater","doi":"10.1097/WCO.0000000000001271","DOIUrl":"10.1097/WCO.0000000000001271","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Anti-IgLON5 disease is characterized by a distinctive sleep disorder, associated with a heterogeneous spectrum of neurological symptoms. Initial autopsies showed a novel neuronal tauopathy predominantly located in the tegmentum of the brainstem. Recently, new diagnostic red flags, biomarkers predictors of response to immunotherapy, and novel insights into the autoimmune pathogenesis of the disease have been reported.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Patients with diagnosis of neurodegenerative dementia, progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) or with motor-neuron disease (MND)-like syndrome have been reported to have IgLON5 antibodies, which are the hallmark of anti-IgLON5 disease. Second, low levels of neurofilament light chain in serum and cerebrospinal fluid of patients at disease onset could be a predictor of immunotherapy response. Recent neuropathological studies indicate that the neuronal tau deposits occur late in the course of the disease. Moreover, IgLON5 antibodies induce cytoskeletal changes in cultured hippocampal neurons suggesting that the tauopathy could be secondary of the IgLON5 antibody effects.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Anti-IgLON5 disease can mimic and should be considered in atypical presentations of MND, neurodegenerative dementia and PSP. Neurofilament light chain levels seem promising biomarker for disease prognosis. Finally, the neuropathological and in vitro experimental studies strengthen the autoimmune hypothesis of the disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":11059,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"316-321"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11064895/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140335112","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-02-07DOI: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000001249
Andrew Charles
Purpose of review: Caffeine is known to have both beneficial and adverse effects in individuals with headache disorders. This review describes recent findings regarding caffeine that are relevant to headache disorders and puts these findings into the context of clinical management.
Recent findings: Preclinical studies show that caffeine has complex effects on sleep, brain blood flow, and intracranial pressure that may depend on the timing of caffeine intake relative to the sleep-wake cycle. Caffeine metabolism may have significant inter-individual variation that influences its therapeutic and/or adverse effects. Caffeine has acute therapeutic benefit for some primary headache disorders. For migraine, this benefit is predominantly in milder headache without cutaneous allodynia. High levels of caffeine intake may contribute to progression of headache disorders. Caffeine-containing combination analgesics commonly cause medication overuse headache. Abrupt reduction in caffeine consumption is a trigger for migraine that may be important in situations including the hospital setting, religious and cultural fasting, and pregnancy.
Summary: There is not sufficient evidence to support universal guidelines for the use of dietary and medicinal caffeine in headache disorders. A sensible approach based upon available evidence is to limit dietary caffeine intake to moderate amounts with consistent timing before noon, and to use caffeine-containing combination analgesics infrequently for milder headache.
{"title":"The role of caffeine in headache disorders.","authors":"Andrew Charles","doi":"10.1097/WCO.0000000000001249","DOIUrl":"10.1097/WCO.0000000000001249","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Caffeine is known to have both beneficial and adverse effects in individuals with headache disorders. This review describes recent findings regarding caffeine that are relevant to headache disorders and puts these findings into the context of clinical management.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Preclinical studies show that caffeine has complex effects on sleep, brain blood flow, and intracranial pressure that may depend on the timing of caffeine intake relative to the sleep-wake cycle. Caffeine metabolism may have significant inter-individual variation that influences its therapeutic and/or adverse effects. Caffeine has acute therapeutic benefit for some primary headache disorders. For migraine, this benefit is predominantly in milder headache without cutaneous allodynia. High levels of caffeine intake may contribute to progression of headache disorders. Caffeine-containing combination analgesics commonly cause medication overuse headache. Abrupt reduction in caffeine consumption is a trigger for migraine that may be important in situations including the hospital setting, religious and cultural fasting, and pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>There is not sufficient evidence to support universal guidelines for the use of dietary and medicinal caffeine in headache disorders. A sensible approach based upon available evidence is to limit dietary caffeine intake to moderate amounts with consistent timing before noon, and to use caffeine-containing combination analgesics infrequently for milder headache.</p>","PeriodicalId":11059,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"289-294"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139702015","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-04-09DOI: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000001262
Stephen Krieger, Karin Cook, Carrie M Hersh
Purpose of review: Research in multiple sclerosis (MS) has long been predicated on clinical groupings that do not reflect the underlying biologic heterogeneity apparent within patient populations. This review explicates the various levels of explanation through which the spectrum of disease is described and investigated both above and below the clinical threshold of detection, as framed by the topographical model of MS, to help advance a cogent mechanistic framework.
Recent findings: Contemporary evidence has amended the view of MS as consisting of sequential disease phases in favor of a spectrum of disease with an admixture of interdependent and dynamic pathobiological axes driving tissue injury and progression. Recent studies have shown the presence of acute and compartmentalized inflammation and mechanisms of neurodegeneration beginning early and evolving throughout the disease continuum. Still, the gap between the understanding of immunopathologic processes in MS and the tools used to measure relevant molecular, laboratory, radiologic, and clinical metrics needs attention to enable better prognostication of disease and monitoring for changes along specific pathologic axes and variable treatment outcomes.
Summary: Aligning on a consistently-applied mechanistic framework at distinct levels of explanation will enable greater precision across bench and clinical research, and inform discourse on drivers of disability progression and delivery of care for individuals with MS.
{"title":"Understanding multiple sclerosis as a disease spectrum: above and below the clinical threshold.","authors":"Stephen Krieger, Karin Cook, Carrie M Hersh","doi":"10.1097/WCO.0000000000001262","DOIUrl":"10.1097/WCO.0000000000001262","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Research in multiple sclerosis (MS) has long been predicated on clinical groupings that do not reflect the underlying biologic heterogeneity apparent within patient populations. This review explicates the various levels of explanation through which the spectrum of disease is described and investigated both above and below the clinical threshold of detection, as framed by the topographical model of MS, to help advance a cogent mechanistic framework.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Contemporary evidence has amended the view of MS as consisting of sequential disease phases in favor of a spectrum of disease with an admixture of interdependent and dynamic pathobiological axes driving tissue injury and progression. Recent studies have shown the presence of acute and compartmentalized inflammation and mechanisms of neurodegeneration beginning early and evolving throughout the disease continuum. Still, the gap between the understanding of immunopathologic processes in MS and the tools used to measure relevant molecular, laboratory, radiologic, and clinical metrics needs attention to enable better prognostication of disease and monitoring for changes along specific pathologic axes and variable treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Aligning on a consistently-applied mechanistic framework at distinct levels of explanation will enable greater precision across bench and clinical research, and inform discourse on drivers of disability progression and delivery of care for individuals with MS.</p>","PeriodicalId":11059,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"189-201"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11064902/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140293122","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-01-31DOI: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000001247
Keiko Ihara, Todd J Schwedt
Purpose of review: Posttraumatic headache (PTH), a headache that develops within 7 days of a causative injury, is one of the most common secondary headaches, mostly attributed to mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Because presence of preinjury headache is a risk factor for developing PTH and PTH symptoms often resemble migraine or tension-type headache, the association between PTH and primary headaches has attracted attention from clinicians and scientists.
Recent findings: Recent studies on epidemiological aspects, headache features, risk factors, imaging characteristics, and response to treatment, suggest overlapping features and distinct objective findings in PTH compared to migraine.
Summary: We argue that PTH is distinct from migraine. Therefore, PTH epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis should continue to be investigated separately from migraine.
{"title":"Posttraumatic headache is a distinct headache type from migraine.","authors":"Keiko Ihara, Todd J Schwedt","doi":"10.1097/WCO.0000000000001247","DOIUrl":"10.1097/WCO.0000000000001247","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Posttraumatic headache (PTH), a headache that develops within 7 days of a causative injury, is one of the most common secondary headaches, mostly attributed to mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Because presence of preinjury headache is a risk factor for developing PTH and PTH symptoms often resemble migraine or tension-type headache, the association between PTH and primary headaches has attracted attention from clinicians and scientists.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent studies on epidemiological aspects, headache features, risk factors, imaging characteristics, and response to treatment, suggest overlapping features and distinct objective findings in PTH compared to migraine.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>We argue that PTH is distinct from migraine. Therefore, PTH epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis should continue to be investigated separately from migraine.</p>","PeriodicalId":11059,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"264-270"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139641751","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-03-14DOI: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000001259
Antonio Farina, Macarena Villagrán-García, Alberto Vogrig, Bastien Joubert
Purpose of review: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) may trigger immune-related adverse events which rarely affect the central nervous system (CNS-irAEs). Over the past few years, cumulative data have led to the characterization of well defined syndromes with distinct cancer and antibody associations as well as different outcomes.
Recent findings: The most frequent CNS-irAE is encephalitis, which includes three main groups: meningoencephalitis, a nonfocal syndrome usually responsive to corticosteroids; limbic encephalitis, associated with high-risk paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS) antibodies (e.g. anti-Hu, anti-Ma2) and neuroendocrine cancers, characterized by poor treatment response and outcomes; and cerebellar ataxia, with variable outcomes (worse when high-risk PNS antibodies are detected). Additionally, a diffuse encephalopathy without inflammatory findings, with poor response to corticosteroids and high mortality has been described. The spectrum of CNS-irAEs also includes meningitis, myelitis, and rarer presentations. A subset of CNS-irAEs (i.e. limbic encephalitis and/or rapidly progressive cerebellar ataxia) is undistinguishable from ICI-naïve PNS.
Summary: The clinical and outcomes diversity of CNS-irAEs suggests different pathogenic mechanisms, which need to be understood to establish more effective and specific treatment modalities. It is crucial to identify biomarkers able to predict which patients will experience severe CNS-irAEs, to anticipate their diagnosis, and to predict long-term outcomes.
{"title":"Central nervous system adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors.","authors":"Antonio Farina, Macarena Villagrán-García, Alberto Vogrig, Bastien Joubert","doi":"10.1097/WCO.0000000000001259","DOIUrl":"10.1097/WCO.0000000000001259","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) may trigger immune-related adverse events which rarely affect the central nervous system (CNS-irAEs). Over the past few years, cumulative data have led to the characterization of well defined syndromes with distinct cancer and antibody associations as well as different outcomes.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The most frequent CNS-irAE is encephalitis, which includes three main groups: meningoencephalitis, a nonfocal syndrome usually responsive to corticosteroids; limbic encephalitis, associated with high-risk paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS) antibodies (e.g. anti-Hu, anti-Ma2) and neuroendocrine cancers, characterized by poor treatment response and outcomes; and cerebellar ataxia, with variable outcomes (worse when high-risk PNS antibodies are detected). Additionally, a diffuse encephalopathy without inflammatory findings, with poor response to corticosteroids and high mortality has been described. The spectrum of CNS-irAEs also includes meningitis, myelitis, and rarer presentations. A subset of CNS-irAEs (i.e. limbic encephalitis and/or rapidly progressive cerebellar ataxia) is undistinguishable from ICI-naïve PNS.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The clinical and outcomes diversity of CNS-irAEs suggests different pathogenic mechanisms, which need to be understood to establish more effective and specific treatment modalities. It is crucial to identify biomarkers able to predict which patients will experience severe CNS-irAEs, to anticipate their diagnosis, and to predict long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11059,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"345-352"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140119034","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-03-18DOI: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000001265
Elisabeth Maillart, Kumaran Deiva, Romain Marignier
Purpose of review: The clinical landscape associated to myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies (MOG-Ab) has undergone a remarkable transformation over the past two decades, primarily driven by advancements in antibody detection techniques that have enhanced both the specificity and sensitivity of assays, enabling the identification of novel clinical phenotypes.
Recent findings: Recent pivotal research publications, comprehensive reviews from established research groups, and most notably the first proposed international criteria for MOG-Ab associated disease (MOGAD) have substantially enriched our understanding of the clinical features associated with MOG-Ab. This review presents a comprehensive overview of the clinical characteristics of patients with MOG-Ab, systematically examining each core clinical syndrome defined by the proposed international MOGAD criteria. We incorporated recent insights and discussed potential challenges in applying these criteria across diverse clinical scenarios.
Summary: The proposed international MOGAD criteria provide a comprehensive, homogeneous, and specific framework for characterizing the clinical features of patients with MOG-Ab, encompassing both paediatric and adult populations. In the future, the widespread adoption of specific and reliable assays for MOG-Ab detection, complemented by the development of surrogate fluid and imaging markers, holds promise for better characterizing atypical presentations, only-cerebrospinal fluid positivity and the MOGAD "seronegative" situations.
{"title":"Clinical characteristics of patients with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies.","authors":"Elisabeth Maillart, Kumaran Deiva, Romain Marignier","doi":"10.1097/WCO.0000000000001265","DOIUrl":"10.1097/WCO.0000000000001265","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The clinical landscape associated to myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies (MOG-Ab) has undergone a remarkable transformation over the past two decades, primarily driven by advancements in antibody detection techniques that have enhanced both the specificity and sensitivity of assays, enabling the identification of novel clinical phenotypes.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent pivotal research publications, comprehensive reviews from established research groups, and most notably the first proposed international criteria for MOG-Ab associated disease (MOGAD) have substantially enriched our understanding of the clinical features associated with MOG-Ab. This review presents a comprehensive overview of the clinical characteristics of patients with MOG-Ab, systematically examining each core clinical syndrome defined by the proposed international MOGAD criteria. We incorporated recent insights and discussed potential challenges in applying these criteria across diverse clinical scenarios.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The proposed international MOGAD criteria provide a comprehensive, homogeneous, and specific framework for characterizing the clinical features of patients with MOG-Ab, encompassing both paediatric and adult populations. In the future, the widespread adoption of specific and reliable assays for MOG-Ab detection, complemented by the development of surrogate fluid and imaging markers, holds promise for better characterizing atypical presentations, only-cerebrospinal fluid positivity and the MOGAD \"seronegative\" situations.</p>","PeriodicalId":11059,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"338-344"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140142944","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-03-11DOI: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000001258
Sarah A Aeschlimann, Antonia Klein, Christoph J Schankin
Purpose of review: Visual snow syndrome (VSS) is a disorder characterized by persistent visual disturbances, including the visual snow phenomenon, palinopsia, heightened perception of entoptic phenomena, impaired night vision, and photophobia. The purpose of this review is to provide an update on recent findings over the past 18 months in VSS research and to summarize the current state of treatment approaches.
Recent findings: Electrophysiological studies have revealed cortical hyperresponsivity in visual brain areas, imaging studies demonstrated microstructural and functional connectivity alterations in multiple cortical and thalamic regions and investigated glutamatergic and serotoninergic neurotransmission. These findings suggest that VSS might be a network disorder.Only few treatment studies are currently available demonstrating limited response to medication and even worsening or triggering of visual symptoms by certain antidepressants. Promising nonpharmacological treatments include mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, the use of chromatic filters, and research on visual noise adaption and neuro-optometric visual rehabilitation therapy (NORT). However, the level of evidence is still low and further research is needed including larger trials and involving objective measures of individual dysfunction.
Summary: Although there has been recent progress, we still have not fully understood the nature of VSS. Further research is needed on a clinical and pathophysiological level to successfully treat the condition.
{"title":"Visual snow syndrome: recent advances in understanding the pathophysiology and potential treatment approaches.","authors":"Sarah A Aeschlimann, Antonia Klein, Christoph J Schankin","doi":"10.1097/WCO.0000000000001258","DOIUrl":"10.1097/WCO.0000000000001258","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Visual snow syndrome (VSS) is a disorder characterized by persistent visual disturbances, including the visual snow phenomenon, palinopsia, heightened perception of entoptic phenomena, impaired night vision, and photophobia. The purpose of this review is to provide an update on recent findings over the past 18 months in VSS research and to summarize the current state of treatment approaches.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Electrophysiological studies have revealed cortical hyperresponsivity in visual brain areas, imaging studies demonstrated microstructural and functional connectivity alterations in multiple cortical and thalamic regions and investigated glutamatergic and serotoninergic neurotransmission. These findings suggest that VSS might be a network disorder.Only few treatment studies are currently available demonstrating limited response to medication and even worsening or triggering of visual symptoms by certain antidepressants. Promising nonpharmacological treatments include mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, the use of chromatic filters, and research on visual noise adaption and neuro-optometric visual rehabilitation therapy (NORT). However, the level of evidence is still low and further research is needed including larger trials and involving objective measures of individual dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Although there has been recent progress, we still have not fully understood the nature of VSS. Further research is needed on a clinical and pathophysiological level to successfully treat the condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":11059,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"283-288"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11064904/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140093610","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-03-21DOI: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000001266
Gavin Giovannoni
Purpose of review: Epidemiological evidence implicates Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) as the cause of multiple sclerosis (MS). However, its biological role in the pathogenesis of MS is uncertain. The article provides an overview of the role of EBV in the pathogenesis of MS and makes a case for targeting EBV as a treatment strategy for MS.
Recent findings: EBV potentially triggers autoimmunity via molecular mimicry or immune dysregulation. Another hypothesis, supported by immunological and virological data, indicates that active EBV infection via latent-lytic infection cycling within the central nervous system or periphery drives MS disease activity. This supports testing small molecule anti-EBV agents targeting both latent and lytic infection, central nervous system-penetrant B-cell therapies and EBV-targeted immunotherapies in MS. Immunotherapies may include EBV-specific cytotoxic or chimeric antigen receptors T-cells, therapeutic EBV vaccines and immune reconstitution therapies to boost endogenous EBV-targeted cytotoxic T-cell responses.
Summary: EBV is the probable cause of MS and is likely to be driving MS disease activity via latent-lytic infection cycling. There is evidence that all licensed MS disease-modifying therapies target EBV, and there is a compelling case for testing other anti-EBV strategies as potential treatments for MS.
综述的目的:流行病学证据表明,爱泼斯坦-巴氏病毒(EBV)是多发性硬化症(MS)的病因。然而,EBV 在多发性硬化症发病机制中的生物学作用尚不确定。文章概述了 EBV 在多发性硬化症发病机制中的作用,并提出了针对 EBV 作为多发性硬化症治疗策略的理由:EBV可能通过分子模拟或免疫失调引发自身免疫。免疫学和病毒学数据支持的另一个假说表明,通过中枢神经系统或外周循环的潜伏裂解型感染,活跃的EB病毒感染驱动了多发性硬化症的疾病活动。这支持在多发性硬化症中测试针对潜伏感染和溶解感染的小分子抗 EBV 药物、中枢神经系统特异性 B 细胞疗法和 EBV 靶向免疫疗法。免疫疗法可能包括 EBV 特异性细胞毒性或嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞、治疗性 EBV 疫苗和免疫重建疗法,以增强内源性 EBV 靶向细胞毒性 T 细胞反应。有证据表明,所有获得许可的多发性硬化症疾病改变疗法都以 EBV 为靶点,因此有充分理由将其他抗 EBV 策略作为多发性硬化症的潜在疗法进行测试。
{"title":"Targeting Epstein-Barr virus in multiple sclerosis: when and how?","authors":"Gavin Giovannoni","doi":"10.1097/WCO.0000000000001266","DOIUrl":"10.1097/WCO.0000000000001266","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Epidemiological evidence implicates Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) as the cause of multiple sclerosis (MS). However, its biological role in the pathogenesis of MS is uncertain. The article provides an overview of the role of EBV in the pathogenesis of MS and makes a case for targeting EBV as a treatment strategy for MS.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>EBV potentially triggers autoimmunity via molecular mimicry or immune dysregulation. Another hypothesis, supported by immunological and virological data, indicates that active EBV infection via latent-lytic infection cycling within the central nervous system or periphery drives MS disease activity. This supports testing small molecule anti-EBV agents targeting both latent and lytic infection, central nervous system-penetrant B-cell therapies and EBV-targeted immunotherapies in MS. Immunotherapies may include EBV-specific cytotoxic or chimeric antigen receptors T-cells, therapeutic EBV vaccines and immune reconstitution therapies to boost endogenous EBV-targeted cytotoxic T-cell responses.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>EBV is the probable cause of MS and is likely to be driving MS disease activity via latent-lytic infection cycling. There is evidence that all licensed MS disease-modifying therapies target EBV, and there is a compelling case for testing other anti-EBV strategies as potential treatments for MS.</p>","PeriodicalId":11059,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"228-236"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140174103","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}