Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-06-11DOI: 10.1159/000546451
Lauren Seidman, Sara Hyman, Rachel Kenney, Avivit Nsiri, Steven Galetta, Arjun V Masurkar, Laura Balcer
Introduction: Effective mild cognitive impairment (MCI) screening requires accessible testing. This study compared two tests for distinguishing MCI patients from controls: rapid automatized naming (RAN) for naming speed and low-contrast letter acuity (LCLA) for sensitivity to low-contrast letters.
Methods: Two RAN tasks were used: the Mobile Universal Lexicon Evaluation System (MULES, picture naming) and the Staggered Uneven Number test (SUN, number naming). Both RAN tasks were administered on a tablet and in a paper/pencil format. The tablet format was administered using the Mobile Integrated Cognitive Kit application. LCLA was tested at 2.5% and 1.25% contrast.
Results: Sixty-four participants (31 MCI, 34 controls; mean age 73.2 ± 6.8 years) were included. MCI patients were slower than controls for paper/pencil (75.0 vs. 53.6 s, p < 0.001), and tablet MULES (69.0 s vs. 50.2 s, p = 0.01). The paper/pencil SUN showed no significant difference (MCI: 59.5 s vs. controls: 59.9 s, p = 0.07) nor did the tablet SUN (MCI: 59.3 s vs. controls: 55.7 s, p = 0.36). MCI patients had worse performance on LCLA testing at 2.5% contrast (33 letters vs. 36, p = 0.04*) and 1.25% (0 letters vs. 14 letters, p < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed similar performance of paper/pencil and tablet MULES in distinguishing MCI from controls (area under the ROC curve [AUC] = 0.77), outperforming both SUN (AUC = 0.63 paper, 0.59 tablet) and LCLA (2.5% contrast: AUC = 0.65, 1.25% contrast: AUC = 0.72).
Conclusion: The MULES, in both formats, may be a valuable screening tool for MCI.
{"title":"Tablet-Based Assessment of Picture Naming in Prodromal Alzheimer's Disease: An Accessible and Effective Tool for Distinguishing Mild Cognitive Impairment from Normal Aging.","authors":"Lauren Seidman, Sara Hyman, Rachel Kenney, Avivit Nsiri, Steven Galetta, Arjun V Masurkar, Laura Balcer","doi":"10.1159/000546451","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000546451","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><p>Introduction: Effective mild cognitive impairment (MCI) screening requires accessible testing. This study compared two tests for distinguishing MCI patients from controls: rapid automatized naming (RAN) for naming speed and low-contrast letter acuity (LCLA) for sensitivity to low-contrast letters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two RAN tasks were used: the Mobile Universal Lexicon Evaluation System (MULES, picture naming) and the Staggered Uneven Number test (SUN, number naming). Both RAN tasks were administered on a tablet and in a paper/pencil format. The tablet format was administered using the Mobile Integrated Cognitive Kit application. LCLA was tested at 2.5% and 1.25% contrast.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-four participants (31 MCI, 34 controls; mean age 73.2 ± 6.8 years) were included. MCI patients were slower than controls for paper/pencil (75.0 vs. 53.6 s, p < 0.001), and tablet MULES (69.0 s vs. 50.2 s, p = 0.01). The paper/pencil SUN showed no significant difference (MCI: 59.5 s vs. controls: 59.9 s, p = 0.07) nor did the tablet SUN (MCI: 59.3 s vs. controls: 55.7 s, p = 0.36). MCI patients had worse performance on LCLA testing at 2.5% contrast (33 letters vs. 36, p = 0.04*) and 1.25% (0 letters vs. 14 letters, p < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed similar performance of paper/pencil and tablet MULES in distinguishing MCI from controls (area under the ROC curve [AUC] = 0.77), outperforming both SUN (AUC = 0.63 paper, 0.59 tablet) and LCLA (2.5% contrast: AUC = 0.65, 1.25% contrast: AUC = 0.72).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The MULES, in both formats, may be a valuable screening tool for MCI. </p>.</p>","PeriodicalId":11126,"journal":{"name":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"3-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12240569/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144274346","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-06-18DOI: 10.1159/000546762
Rui Xu, Yongjun Gao
Introduction: Studies on Alzheimer's disease (AD) indicate inflammation does not just follow but drives neurodegeneration. Protein aggregation in neurodegeneration can trigger neuroinflammation, worsening protein aggregation and neurodegeneration. The aim of this study was to use bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) approach to find the causal link between specific inflammatory proteins and AD, creating new hypotheses for studying AD's pathological mechanisms.
Methods: Independent genetic variants for 91 inflammatory proteins (14,824 individuals) and AD (111,326 clinically diagnosed/"proxy" AD patients and 677,663 controls) were selected as instrumental variables (IVs) from published genome-wide association studies among individuals of predominantly European ancestry. MR analyses included the inverse-variance-weighted (IVW) method, weighted median estimator, MR-Egger regression, sample mode, weighted mode, and sensitivity analyses of Cochran's Q test, MR-PRESSO, leave-one-out analysis, false discovery rate correction, and MR-Egger intercept test. We employed a bidirectional two-sample MR approach to explore the causal relationship between inflammatory proteins and AD.
Results: Our findings are mainly based on the IVW approach. Our results indicate that elevated levels of TNF-β (OR = 0.917, 95% CI = 0.862-0.975, p = 0.006) and IL-6 (OR = 0.941, 95% CI = 0.899-0.985, p = 0.009) are significantly associated with a reduced AD risk, while AD has no impact on the levels of the 91 inflammatory proteins selected in this paper. The results of the sensitivity analyses were robust.
Conclusion: Elevated levels of TNF-β and IL-6 exert a protective effect against the occurrence of AD.
{"title":"Causal Relationship between Inflammatory Proteins and Alzheimer's Disease: A Two-Sample Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Study.","authors":"Rui Xu, Yongjun Gao","doi":"10.1159/000546762","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000546762","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Studies on Alzheimer's disease (AD) indicate inflammation does not just follow but drives neurodegeneration. Protein aggregation in neurodegeneration can trigger neuroinflammation, worsening protein aggregation and neurodegeneration. The aim of this study was to use bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) approach to find the causal link between specific inflammatory proteins and AD, creating new hypotheses for studying AD's pathological mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Independent genetic variants for 91 inflammatory proteins (14,824 individuals) and AD (111,326 clinically diagnosed/\"proxy\" AD patients and 677,663 controls) were selected as instrumental variables (IVs) from published genome-wide association studies among individuals of predominantly European ancestry. MR analyses included the inverse-variance-weighted (IVW) method, weighted median estimator, MR-Egger regression, sample mode, weighted mode, and sensitivity analyses of Cochran's Q test, MR-PRESSO, leave-one-out analysis, false discovery rate correction, and MR-Egger intercept test. We employed a bidirectional two-sample MR approach to explore the causal relationship between inflammatory proteins and AD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings are mainly based on the IVW approach. Our results indicate that elevated levels of TNF-β (OR = 0.917, 95% CI = 0.862-0.975, p = 0.006) and IL-6 (OR = 0.941, 95% CI = 0.899-0.985, p = 0.009) are significantly associated with a reduced AD risk, while AD has no impact on the levels of the 91 inflammatory proteins selected in this paper. The results of the sensitivity analyses were robust.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Elevated levels of TNF-β and IL-6 exert a protective effect against the occurrence of AD.</p>","PeriodicalId":11126,"journal":{"name":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"26-37"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144324712","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-06-30DOI: 10.1159/000547124
Bruna Seixas-Lima, Malcolm Binns, Sandra E Black, Morris Freedman, Sanjeev Kumar, Durjoy Lahiri, Carlos Tyler Roncero, Stephen Strother, David F Tang-Wai, Maria Carmela Tartaglia, Howard Chertkow
Introduction: We aimed to identify cognitive subgroups of clinically diagnosed Alzheimer's disease (Alzheimer syndrome) and related dementias and test if age of presentation influences patterns of cognitive impairment.
Methods: Participants were individuals with mild cognitive impairment (n = 360), vascular mild cognitive impairment (n = 73), Alzheimer syndrome (n = 127), vascular dementia (n = 32), mixed dementia (n = 23), and healthy controls (n = 305). Principal component analysis was run on 25 cognitive variables measured by the Toronto Cognitive Assessment (TorCA). We used hierarchical clustering to identify cognitive subgroups.
Results: We identified seven subgroups. The youngest group was characterized by the lowest scores on the overall TorCA mean, and also on executive function, visuospatial function, and attention, while showing the highest scores on Memory, Orientation, and Language. The oldest clusters had low scores on Memory and Orientation but higher scores on attention. The intermediary clusters had similar age and severity distributions.
Conclusion: The results demonstrate that patterns of cognitive impairment are different in different age groups.
{"title":"The Relationship between Age and Cognitive Subtypes of Alzheimer Syndrome and Related Dementias.","authors":"Bruna Seixas-Lima, Malcolm Binns, Sandra E Black, Morris Freedman, Sanjeev Kumar, Durjoy Lahiri, Carlos Tyler Roncero, Stephen Strother, David F Tang-Wai, Maria Carmela Tartaglia, Howard Chertkow","doi":"10.1159/000547124","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000547124","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We aimed to identify cognitive subgroups of clinically diagnosed Alzheimer's disease (Alzheimer syndrome) and related dementias and test if age of presentation influences patterns of cognitive impairment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were individuals with mild cognitive impairment (n = 360), vascular mild cognitive impairment (n = 73), Alzheimer syndrome (n = 127), vascular dementia (n = 32), mixed dementia (n = 23), and healthy controls (n = 305). Principal component analysis was run on 25 cognitive variables measured by the Toronto Cognitive Assessment (TorCA). We used hierarchical clustering to identify cognitive subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified seven subgroups. The youngest group was characterized by the lowest scores on the overall TorCA mean, and also on executive function, visuospatial function, and attention, while showing the highest scores on Memory, Orientation, and Language. The oldest clusters had low scores on Memory and Orientation but higher scores on attention. The intermediary clusters had similar age and severity distributions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results demonstrate that patterns of cognitive impairment are different in different age groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":11126,"journal":{"name":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"38-48"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144526802","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-06-20DOI: 10.1159/000546741
Alcibiades E Villarreal, Giselle A Rangel, Adam E Tratner, Diana C Oviedo, Maria B Carreira F, Sid E O Apos Bryant, Estefani C Sanchez Castillo, Carolina E Rodríguez, Gabrielle B Britton
Introduction: The apolipoprotein E (APOE) gene is a well-established risk factor for Alzheimer's disease, with the APOE ε4 allele being the most strongly associated genetic variant. Research has suggested that the influence of APOE ε4 on cognitive decline may vary across different populations. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between APOE genotype and cognitive aging in Hispanics.
Methods: A diverse sample of Hispanic adults was recruited for a study on cognitive aging. Data were analyzed for n = 725 participants from the Panama Aging Research Initiative - Health Disparities (PARI-HD) study. Participants were divided into 2 groups, an outpatient cohort (n = 269) and a community cohort (n = 456) and underwent comprehensive neuropsychological assessments.
Results: A greater number of participants in the outpatient cohort were cognitively impaired than the community cohort, and the outpatient cohort had a significantly higher frequency of ε4 (33.8% vs. 25.7%). Results showed that carrying at least one copy of the APOE ε4 allele was a significant predictor of cognitive impairment in the community cohort (OR = 2.06, 95% CI = 1.14-3.72, p = 0.017) but was not significantly associated with performance on cognitive tests for either cohort.
Conclusion: These findings suggest that APOE ε4 confers risk for cognitive deterioration in the Panamanian population, highlighting the importance of considering genetic and demographic factors in understanding the heterogeneity of cognitive impairment.
载脂蛋白E (APOE)基因是阿尔茨海默病的一个公认的危险因素,APOEε4等位基因是与阿尔茨海默病相关性最强的遗传变异。研究表明,APOEε4对认知能力下降的影响可能在不同的人群中有所不同。本研究旨在探讨APOE基因型与西班牙裔认知衰老的关系。方法:一个不同的西班牙裔成年人的样本被招募为研究认知老化。数据分析来自巴拿马老龄化研究倡议-健康差距(PARI-HD)研究的n = 725名参与者。参与者被分为两组,门诊队列(n = 269)和社区队列(n = 456),并进行了全面的神经心理学评估。结果:门诊队列的认知障碍发生率高于社区队列,且ε4发生率显著高于社区队列(33.8% vs. 25.7%)。结果显示,携带至少一个APOEε4等位基因拷贝是社区队列中认知障碍的重要预测因子(OR = 2.06, 95% CI = 1.14-3.72, p = 0.017),但与两个队列的认知测试成绩无显著相关性。结论:这些研究结果表明,APOEε4在巴拿马人群中具有认知功能退化的风险,强调了在理解认知功能障碍异质性时考虑遗传和人口统计学因素的重要性。
{"title":"The Impact of APOE ε4 on Neuropsychological Test Performance in Hispanics: The Panama Aging Research Initiative - Health Disparities Study.","authors":"Alcibiades E Villarreal, Giselle A Rangel, Adam E Tratner, Diana C Oviedo, Maria B Carreira F, Sid E O Apos Bryant, Estefani C Sanchez Castillo, Carolina E Rodríguez, Gabrielle B Britton","doi":"10.1159/000546741","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000546741","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The apolipoprotein E (APOE) gene is a well-established risk factor for Alzheimer's disease, with the APOE ε4 allele being the most strongly associated genetic variant. Research has suggested that the influence of APOE ε4 on cognitive decline may vary across different populations. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between APOE genotype and cognitive aging in Hispanics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A diverse sample of Hispanic adults was recruited for a study on cognitive aging. Data were analyzed for n = 725 participants from the Panama Aging Research Initiative - Health Disparities (PARI-HD) study. Participants were divided into 2 groups, an outpatient cohort (n = 269) and a community cohort (n = 456) and underwent comprehensive neuropsychological assessments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A greater number of participants in the outpatient cohort were cognitively impaired than the community cohort, and the outpatient cohort had a significantly higher frequency of ε4 (33.8% vs. 25.7%). Results showed that carrying at least one copy of the APOE ε4 allele was a significant predictor of cognitive impairment in the community cohort (OR = 2.06, 95% CI = 1.14-3.72, p = 0.017) but was not significantly associated with performance on cognitive tests for either cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that APOE ε4 confers risk for cognitive deterioration in the Panamanian population, highlighting the importance of considering genetic and demographic factors in understanding the heterogeneity of cognitive impairment.</p>","PeriodicalId":11126,"journal":{"name":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"15-25"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144474222","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a growing global health concern that increases dementia risk in older adults, including those in Thailand. Using an eight-session Multi-Modal Cognitive Stimulation Program (MCSP) is an effective non-pharmacological intervention for slowing cognitive decline and improving cognition and quality of life (QOL).
Method: This randomized controlled trial examined the effects of an eight-session MCSP on cognition and QOL in Thai older adults with MCI. Sixty-six participants were randomized into intervention (n = 32) and control (n = 34) groups. Cognitive assessments included the Mini-Mental Statement Examination Thai version 2002, Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease, Color Trails Test, and Digit Span, alongside the QOL-AD. Principal component analysis was used to aggregate cognitive assessment scores. Demographic data were analyzed using chi-square and t tests, and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was employed for cognition and QOL outcomes.
Results: After the intervention, the MCSP group exhibited significantly higher cognitive and QOL scores than the control group. ANCOVA demonstrated that group, sex, age, education, and baseline scores significantly predicted changes in cognition and QOL outcomes. The intervention group showed significant improvements in overall cognition (F(1, 58) = 4.75, p = 0.033, ηp2 = 0.076) and QOL (F(1, 58) = 6.05, p = 0.017, ηp2 = 0.094).
Conclusion: An eight-session MCSP significantly improves cognition and QOL in Thai older adults with MCI, as assessed by a comprehensive cognitive battery and the QOL-AD, compared to a control group.
轻度认知障碍(MCI)是一个日益严重的全球健康问题,它增加了老年人(包括泰国老年人)患痴呆症的风险。使用8次多模态认知刺激计划(MCSP)是一种有效的非药物干预,可减缓认知衰退,改善认知和生活质量(QOL)。方法:本随机对照试验研究了8期MCSP对泰国老年轻度认知障碍患者认知和生活质量的影响。66名参与者随机分为干预组(n=32)和对照组(n=34)。认知评估包括MMSE、CERAD、颜色轨迹测试和数字广度,以及QOL-AD。主成分分析用于统计认知评估得分。人口统计学资料采用卡方检验和t检验,认知和生活质量指标采用协方差分析(ANCOVA)。结果:干预后,MCSP组的认知和生活质量评分显著高于对照组。ANCOVA表明,组、性别、年龄、教育程度和基线评分显著预测认知和生活质量结果的变化。干预组整体认知能力(F(1,58) = 4.75, p = 0.033, ηp²= 0.076)和生活质量(F(1,58) = 6.05, p = 0.017, ηp²= 0.094)均有显著改善。结论:通过综合认知电池和QOL- ad评估,与对照组相比,8期MCSP显著改善了泰国老年MCI患者的认知和生活质量。
{"title":"Multi-Modal Cognitive Stimulation Program Improves Cognition and Quality of Life in Thai Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Phenphichcha Chuchuen, Chavit Tunvirachaisakul, Phot Dhammapeera","doi":"10.1159/000547310","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000547310","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a growing global health concern that increases dementia risk in older adults, including those in Thailand. Using an eight-session Multi-Modal Cognitive Stimulation Program (MCSP) is an effective non-pharmacological intervention for slowing cognitive decline and improving cognition and quality of life (QOL).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This randomized controlled trial examined the effects of an eight-session MCSP on cognition and QOL in Thai older adults with MCI. Sixty-six participants were randomized into intervention (n = 32) and control (n = 34) groups. Cognitive assessments included the Mini-Mental Statement Examination Thai version 2002, Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease, Color Trails Test, and Digit Span, alongside the QOL-AD. Principal component analysis was used to aggregate cognitive assessment scores. Demographic data were analyzed using chi-square and t tests, and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was employed for cognition and QOL outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After the intervention, the MCSP group exhibited significantly higher cognitive and QOL scores than the control group. ANCOVA demonstrated that group, sex, age, education, and baseline scores significantly predicted changes in cognition and QOL outcomes. The intervention group showed significant improvements in overall cognition (F(1, 58) = 4.75, p = 0.033, ηp2 = 0.076) and QOL (F(1, 58) = 6.05, p = 0.017, ηp2 = 0.094).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An eight-session MCSP significantly improves cognition and QOL in Thai older adults with MCI, as assessed by a comprehensive cognitive battery and the QOL-AD, compared to a control group.</p>","PeriodicalId":11126,"journal":{"name":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"61-70"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144636502","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-06-25DOI: 10.1159/000547061
Alvin Keng, Daniel Kapustin, Clement Ma, Kathleen S Bingham, Corinne E Fischer, Linda Mah, Damien Gallagher, Meryl A Butters, Christopher R Bowie, Aristotle N Voineskos, Ariel Graff-Guerrero, Alastair J Flint, Nathan Herrmann, Bruce G Pollock, Benoit H Mulsant, Tarek K Rajji, Sanjeev Kumar
Introduction: Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) are common in neurocognitive disorders. However, the differences in presentation of NPS in high-risk states for dementia such as mild neurocognitive disorder (Mild NCD) and remitted major depressive disorder (rMDD) remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to compare the frequency and factor structure of NPS in Mild NCD, rMDD, and Mild NCD with rMDD (Mild NCD-rMDD).
Methods: We analyzed baseline data from the multicenter Prevention of Alzheimer's Dementia with Cognitive Remediation plus Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Depression trial (NCT0238667). NPS were assessed using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire in those with Mild NCD, rMDD, and Mild NCD-rMDD. We compared the NPS frequency and factor structure across the three groups.
Results: Among 374 participants with a mean (SD) age = 72.0 (6.3) years, the overall frequency of any NPS was highest in Mild NCD-rMDD (75.9%), as compared to Mild NCD (63.5%) or rMDD (55.7%) groups (p = 0.014). Depression/dysphoria was the most common NPS in all three groups. In factor analyses, NPS grouped into four factor structures in all three groups, but the composition of factors of individual symptoms (delusions, motor disturbances, nighttime behaviors, anxiety, and apathy) were different.
Conclusion: NPS are common in high-risk states of dementia, and the frequency of NPS is higher in Mild NCD-rMDD as compared to only Mild NCD or rMDD. Further, there are key differences in presentation of NPS in Mild NCD, rMDD, and Mild NCD-rMDD. Future studies should investigate the relevance of these differences for cognition, function, and disease biomarkers.
{"title":"Neuropsychiatric Symptoms Present Differently in Individuals with Different High-Risk States of Dementia.","authors":"Alvin Keng, Daniel Kapustin, Clement Ma, Kathleen S Bingham, Corinne E Fischer, Linda Mah, Damien Gallagher, Meryl A Butters, Christopher R Bowie, Aristotle N Voineskos, Ariel Graff-Guerrero, Alastair J Flint, Nathan Herrmann, Bruce G Pollock, Benoit H Mulsant, Tarek K Rajji, Sanjeev Kumar","doi":"10.1159/000547061","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000547061","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><p>Introduction: Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) are common in neurocognitive disorders. However, the differences in presentation of NPS in high-risk states for dementia such as mild neurocognitive disorder (Mild NCD) and remitted major depressive disorder (rMDD) remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to compare the frequency and factor structure of NPS in Mild NCD, rMDD, and Mild NCD with rMDD (Mild NCD-rMDD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed baseline data from the multicenter Prevention of Alzheimer's Dementia with Cognitive Remediation plus Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Depression trial (NCT0238667). NPS were assessed using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire in those with Mild NCD, rMDD, and Mild NCD-rMDD. We compared the NPS frequency and factor structure across the three groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 374 participants with a mean (SD) age = 72.0 (6.3) years, the overall frequency of any NPS was highest in Mild NCD-rMDD (75.9%), as compared to Mild NCD (63.5%) or rMDD (55.7%) groups (p = 0.014). Depression/dysphoria was the most common NPS in all three groups. In factor analyses, NPS grouped into four factor structures in all three groups, but the composition of factors of individual symptoms (delusions, motor disturbances, nighttime behaviors, anxiety, and apathy) were different.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NPS are common in high-risk states of dementia, and the frequency of NPS is higher in Mild NCD-rMDD as compared to only Mild NCD or rMDD. Further, there are key differences in presentation of NPS in Mild NCD, rMDD, and Mild NCD-rMDD. Future studies should investigate the relevance of these differences for cognition, function, and disease biomarkers. </p>.</p>","PeriodicalId":11126,"journal":{"name":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"49-60"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12503446/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144495072","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Liqing Li, Wenhui Liu, Zhongyang Guan, Xin Shen, Lixin Sun
Introduction: As global population aging intensifies, falls among older adults have emerged as a critical public health challenge. While evidence indicates sex differences in fall rates, few Chinese studies have examined sex-specific risk factors. This study aimed to investigate sex disparities and determinants of falls among Chinese adults aged 45 and above using data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS).
Methods: The research analyzed data on 9,284 participants from the fifth wave of the CHARLS. The study investigated the prevalence and associated factors of falls among older individuals, stratified by sex, using logistic regression analysis. Additionally, we examined the interactions between other covariates and sex.
Results: The prevalence of falls among the elderly population in China was 20.1%, with 23.12% among women and 14.99% among men (p < 0.001). Age, self-perceived health, mental health, sleep duration, alcohol consumption, social activity, bodily pain, and number of chronic diseases were correlated with falls in both sexes (p < 0.05), with no significant interaction (p > 0.050). Age over 80 years and having a chronic disease were significantly associated with falls in men (p < 0.05), but not in women (p = 0.163). The correlation between depression and falls was stronger in females than in males (p < 0.001), inverse in self-perceived health (p < 0.001) group. Females who drank alcohol had an increased prevalence of falls (p < 0.05). Taking part in social activities was correlated with falls in females (p = 0.002), but not in males (p = 0.738).
Conclusions: Falls are a serious health issue in China. There is an urgent need for prevention and intervention activities for older individuals, and these needs diverge along sex lines.
{"title":"Sex Differences and Determinants of Late-Life Falls in China: A Cross-Sectional Study Based on the CHARLS Dataset.","authors":"Liqing Li, Wenhui Liu, Zhongyang Guan, Xin Shen, Lixin Sun","doi":"10.1159/000549680","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000549680","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>As global population aging intensifies, falls among older adults have emerged as a critical public health challenge. While evidence indicates sex differences in fall rates, few Chinese studies have examined sex-specific risk factors. This study aimed to investigate sex disparities and determinants of falls among Chinese adults aged 45 and above using data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The research analyzed data on 9,284 participants from the fifth wave of the CHARLS. The study investigated the prevalence and associated factors of falls among older individuals, stratified by sex, using logistic regression analysis. Additionally, we examined the interactions between other covariates and sex.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of falls among the elderly population in China was 20.1%, with 23.12% among women and 14.99% among men (p < 0.001). Age, self-perceived health, mental health, sleep duration, alcohol consumption, social activity, bodily pain, and number of chronic diseases were correlated with falls in both sexes (p < 0.05), with no significant interaction (p > 0.050). Age over 80 years and having a chronic disease were significantly associated with falls in men (p < 0.05), but not in women (p = 0.163). The correlation between depression and falls was stronger in females than in males (p < 0.001), inverse in self-perceived health (p < 0.001) group. Females who drank alcohol had an increased prevalence of falls (p < 0.05). Taking part in social activities was correlated with falls in females (p = 0.002), but not in males (p = 0.738).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Falls are a serious health issue in China. There is an urgent need for prevention and intervention activities for older individuals, and these needs diverge along sex lines.</p>","PeriodicalId":11126,"journal":{"name":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145630668","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Edmond Teng, Yihao Li, Mira Blendstrup, Claire J Lansdall
Introduction: Evaluating formal and informal care utilization in Alzheimer's disease (AD) is crucial for assessing the economic impact of novel disease-modifying treatments. The Resource Utilization in Dementia-Lite (RUD-Lite) scale is widely used to measure care utilization in dementia; however, RUD-Lite data are limited for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and mostly from observational studies. We analyzed RUD-Lite data from a study of semorinemab (NCT03289143) in MCI (i.e., prodromal AD) and mild AD dementia (i.e., mild AD) to explore potential differences in care utilization between observational and interventional studies.
Methods: We analyzed cross-sectional and longitudinal RUD-Lite indices in prodromal (pAD: n = 160) and mild (mAD: n = 288) AD groups, examining formal care usage and informal caregiver time. Unadjusted and adjusted analyses were performed on longitudinal data. North American and European cohorts were compared to explore potential regional differences.
Results: More informal caregiving assistance was required for mAD versus pAD participants at baseline and the mAD group demonstrated significant greater increases over 18 months. Cross-sectional data indicated more caregiver assistance for instrumental activities of daily living in North America versus Europe, with comparable longitudinal increases in caregiver assistance across regions.
Conclusion: Longitudinal RUD-Lite changes in interventional early AD studies are detectable but smaller than in observational studies, possibly due to differences in cohort characteristics. These factors, along with subtle regional differences in care utilization, should be considered when using observational data to guide interventional trials.
引言:评估阿尔茨海默病(AD)的正式和非正式护理利用是评估新型疾病修饰治疗的经济影响的关键。痴呆症生活资源利用量表(Resource Utilization in dementia - life, rad - lite)被广泛用于衡量痴呆症患者的护理利用情况;然而,对于轻度认知障碍(MCI), rad - lite数据有限,而且主要来自观察性研究。我们分析了semorinemab (NCT03289143)在MCI(即前体AD)和轻度AD痴呆(即轻度AD)研究中的rad - lite数据,以探讨观察性研究和介入性研究在护理利用方面的潜在差异。方法:我们分析了前驱AD组(pAD: n=160)和轻度AD组(mAD: n=288)的横断面和纵向rad - life指数,考察了正式护理使用情况和非正式护理时间。对纵向数据进行未调整和调整分析。将北美和欧洲的队列进行比较,以探索潜在的地区差异。结果:与pAD参与者相比,mAD参与者在基线时需要更多的非正式护理协助,mAD组在18个月内表现出更大的显着增长。横断面数据表明,与欧洲相比,北美的护理人员对日常生活的辅助活动提供了更多的帮助,各地区护理人员的纵向援助也有相当的增加。结论:介入性早期阿尔茨海默病研究中的纵向rad - life变化是可检测到的,但比观察性研究中的变化要小,可能是由于队列特征的差异。在使用观察性数据指导干预性试验时,应考虑到这些因素以及护理利用的微妙地区差异。
{"title":"Formal and Informal Care Utilization in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Mild Dementia due to Alzheimer's Disease: Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Analyses of RUD-Lite Data from the Tauriel Study.","authors":"Edmond Teng, Yihao Li, Mira Blendstrup, Claire J Lansdall","doi":"10.1159/000549652","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000549652","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Evaluating formal and informal care utilization in Alzheimer's disease (AD) is crucial for assessing the economic impact of novel disease-modifying treatments. The Resource Utilization in Dementia-Lite (RUD-Lite) scale is widely used to measure care utilization in dementia; however, RUD-Lite data are limited for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and mostly from observational studies. We analyzed RUD-Lite data from a study of semorinemab (NCT03289143) in MCI (i.e., prodromal AD) and mild AD dementia (i.e., mild AD) to explore potential differences in care utilization between observational and interventional studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed cross-sectional and longitudinal RUD-Lite indices in prodromal (pAD: n = 160) and mild (mAD: n = 288) AD groups, examining formal care usage and informal caregiver time. Unadjusted and adjusted analyses were performed on longitudinal data. North American and European cohorts were compared to explore potential regional differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>More informal caregiving assistance was required for mAD versus pAD participants at baseline and the mAD group demonstrated significant greater increases over 18 months. Cross-sectional data indicated more caregiver assistance for instrumental activities of daily living in North America versus Europe, with comparable longitudinal increases in caregiver assistance across regions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Longitudinal RUD-Lite changes in interventional early AD studies are detectable but smaller than in observational studies, possibly due to differences in cohort characteristics. These factors, along with subtle regional differences in care utilization, should be considered when using observational data to guide interventional trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":11126,"journal":{"name":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12782609/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145602875","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: As a major contributor to dementia burden worldwide, Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathogenesis involves critical phosphorylated tau (p-tau) abnormalities. This research employed bibliometric methods to systematically evaluate worldwide scientific trends, emerging foci, and international collaboration patterns regarding p-tau in AD research.
Methods: Relevant publications spanning 1991-2024 from the Web of Science Core Collection were extracted. Bibliometric analysis was performed using R package "Bibliometrix" (v4.3.3), CiteSpace (v6.1.R2) and VOSviewer (v1.6.20).
Results: A total of 2,685 publications were included. China led in publication volume (612, 22.8%), followed by the USA (586, 21.8%) and Sweden (212, 7.9%). University of London was the most productive institution (603 publications). Blennow Kaj stood out with publications and citations of 270 and 18,093. The Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Neurology were the top-ranked journal, with the highest publications (321) and citations (6,446), respectively. Cluster analysis revealed four major clusters, including mechanisms underlying p-tau in AD, p-tau as biomarker in AD, diagnosis of AD using p-tau, and consensus in AD. Keyword burst analysis emphasized recent terms such as "neurofilament light," "dysfunction," "performance," and "biomarker."
Conclusion: This study systematically analyzed the researches on p-tau in AD. Research hotspots have evolved from the early focus on pathological features to the exploration of biomarkers-based diagnosis. Recently, the comprehensive assessment AD is emphasized, suggesting that future studies should pay more attention to regulatory mechanism of abnormal p-tau for identification of therapeutic targets and overcome the challenges of p-tau as biomarkers during clinical diagnosis.
作为全球痴呆负担的主要贡献者,阿尔茨海默病(AD)的发病机制涉及关键的磷酸化tau (p-tau)异常。本研究采用文献计量学方法系统评估AD研究中p-tau蛋白的全球科学趋势、新兴焦点和国际合作模式。方法:提取Web of Science核心馆藏1991-2024年的相关出版物。使用R软件包“Bibliometrix”(v4.3.3)、CiteSpace (v6.1.R2)和VOSviewer (v1.6.20)进行文献计量学分析。结果:共纳入2685篇文献。中国发表论文数量最多(612篇,22.8%),其次是美国(586篇,21.8%)和瑞典(212篇,7.9%)。伦敦大学是最多产的机构(603篇论文)。Blennow Kaj以270篇论文和18093篇引文脱颖而出。《阿尔茨海默病与神经病学杂志》(Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Neurology)是排名最高的期刊,分别拥有最高的出版物(321篇)和引用(6446篇)。聚类分析揭示了四个主要的聚类,包括p-tau在AD中的潜在机制,p-tau作为AD的生物标志物,使用p-tau诊断AD,以及AD的共识。关键词爆发分析强调了“神经丝光”、“功能障碍”、“性能”和“生物标志物”等近期术语。结论:本研究系统分析了AD中p-tau蛋白的相关研究。研究热点从早期对病理特征的关注发展到对基于生物标志物的诊断的探索。近年来,AD的综合评价受到重视,提示未来的研究应更多地关注异常p-tau的调控机制,以确定治疗靶点,并克服p-tau作为生物标志物在临床诊断中的挑战。
{"title":"Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis of P-Tau in Alzheimer's Disease: Trends and Emerging Research Priorities (1991-2024).","authors":"Xing Wang, Ying Shen, Chao Lei, Juan Chai, Qian Tan, Yanqiong Qin","doi":"10.1159/000549394","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000549394","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>As a major contributor to dementia burden worldwide, Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathogenesis involves critical phosphorylated tau (p-tau) abnormalities. This research employed bibliometric methods to systematically evaluate worldwide scientific trends, emerging foci, and international collaboration patterns regarding p-tau in AD research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Relevant publications spanning 1991-2024 from the Web of Science Core Collection were extracted. Bibliometric analysis was performed using R package \"Bibliometrix\" (v4.3.3), CiteSpace (v6.1.R2) and VOSviewer (v1.6.20).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,685 publications were included. China led in publication volume (612, 22.8%), followed by the USA (586, 21.8%) and Sweden (212, 7.9%). University of London was the most productive institution (603 publications). Blennow Kaj stood out with publications and citations of 270 and 18,093. The Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Neurology were the top-ranked journal, with the highest publications (321) and citations (6,446), respectively. Cluster analysis revealed four major clusters, including mechanisms underlying p-tau in AD, p-tau as biomarker in AD, diagnosis of AD using p-tau, and consensus in AD. Keyword burst analysis emphasized recent terms such as \"neurofilament light,\" \"dysfunction,\" \"performance,\" and \"biomarker.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study systematically analyzed the researches on p-tau in AD. Research hotspots have evolved from the early focus on pathological features to the exploration of biomarkers-based diagnosis. Recently, the comprehensive assessment AD is emphasized, suggesting that future studies should pay more attention to regulatory mechanism of abnormal p-tau for identification of therapeutic targets and overcome the challenges of p-tau as biomarkers during clinical diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":11126,"journal":{"name":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145563261","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Standard cognitive screening instruments such as the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) often fail to identify cognitive impairment in individuals with low literacy or no formal education as these tests rely heavily on reading, writing, and abstract reasoning. In Morocco and other low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), this limitation contributes to the under-recognition and diagnostic inaccuracy of dementia, particularly in communities with limited access to education or healthcare resources. The aim of the study was to develop and validate a culturally adapted, literacy-independent cognitive screening battery, the Jilla Moroccan Dementia Scale (J-MDS), specifically designed for use among adults with limited schooling in Morocco.
Methods: The J-MDS comprises 17 entirely oral and pictorial subtests assessing memory, attention, language, executive function, praxis, and orientation. A total of 109 participants were included (54 living with dementia and 55 cognitively healthy controls). Dementia diagnosis was established according to DSM-5 clinical criteria, which served as the gold standard. Psychometric properties of the J-MDS were compared with the Moroccan Arabic version of the MoCA (MoCA-Darija). Internal consistency, concurrent validity, and diagnostic accuracy were assessed following the STARDem guidelines.
Results: The J-MDS demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.936) and a strong correlation with the MoCA (ρ = 0.944, p < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.986, with an optimal cutoff score of 82, yielding 98.15% sensitivity and 94.55% specificity for dementia detection. Test performance was unaffected by gender, moderately influenced by age and education level, and remained robust across literacy groups.
Conclusion: The J-MDS is a reliable, culturally relevant, and clinically feasible cognitive screening tool for low-literacy populations. Its strong psychometric performance and simple administration make it well suited for community and primary care settings in Morocco and comparable LMICs. Future multicentre and longitudinal studies are recommended to establish normative data and confirm its applicability across diverse cultural contexts.
{"title":"Culturally Adapted Cognitive Screening: Validation of the Jilla Moroccan Dementia Scale.","authors":"Mariam Jilla, Saad Mars, Nouhaila Laghnimi, Adil Gourinda, Amine Fakir, Aamer M'Barki, Habiba Zouali, Rachid Belfkih, Said Boujraf, Abdelhamid Benazzouz, Zouhayr Souirtic","doi":"10.1159/000549500","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000549500","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Standard cognitive screening instruments such as the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) often fail to identify cognitive impairment in individuals with low literacy or no formal education as these tests rely heavily on reading, writing, and abstract reasoning. In Morocco and other low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), this limitation contributes to the under-recognition and diagnostic inaccuracy of dementia, particularly in communities with limited access to education or healthcare resources. The aim of the study was to develop and validate a culturally adapted, literacy-independent cognitive screening battery, the Jilla Moroccan Dementia Scale (J-MDS), specifically designed for use among adults with limited schooling in Morocco.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The J-MDS comprises 17 entirely oral and pictorial subtests assessing memory, attention, language, executive function, praxis, and orientation. A total of 109 participants were included (54 living with dementia and 55 cognitively healthy controls). Dementia diagnosis was established according to DSM-5 clinical criteria, which served as the gold standard. Psychometric properties of the J-MDS were compared with the Moroccan Arabic version of the MoCA (MoCA-Darija). Internal consistency, concurrent validity, and diagnostic accuracy were assessed following the STARDem guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The J-MDS demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.936) and a strong correlation with the MoCA (ρ = 0.944, p < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.986, with an optimal cutoff score of 82, yielding 98.15% sensitivity and 94.55% specificity for dementia detection. Test performance was unaffected by gender, moderately influenced by age and education level, and remained robust across literacy groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The J-MDS is a reliable, culturally relevant, and clinically feasible cognitive screening tool for low-literacy populations. Its strong psychometric performance and simple administration make it well suited for community and primary care settings in Morocco and comparable LMICs. Future multicentre and longitudinal studies are recommended to establish normative data and confirm its applicability across diverse cultural contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":11126,"journal":{"name":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145512133","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}