首页 > 最新文献

Day 3 Wed, June 30, 2021最新文献

英文 中文
Situational Analysis of Complex Offshore Network for Strategizing Sequence for Green Field Development 复杂海上网络绿地开发战略序列的态势分析
Pub Date : 2021-06-28 DOI: 10.2118/200933-ms
Sukrut Shridhar Kulkarni, Marliana Bt Mohammad, Sharifah Nooraini Bt Syed Tahir, Frankie Kia Yong Tan, M. Supu
This paper establishes the approach to strategize the appropriate sequencing and monetization of the green field development through performing situational analysis for the complex offshore facilities to recognize new hydrocarbon molecules. As prudent operator for the complex network its crucial to pursue strategic ideas and innovative concepts to optimize supply demand balance, fulfill contractual obligations to optimize resources to maximize value creation, whilst protecting investment decisions for hydrocarbon monetization for the green field development. It is therefore necessary to implement successful business plans with appropriate sequencing of new fields by robust assessment to decipher the pain points to achieve optimal solution by gaining better understanding of network characteristic, supply distribution and operating envelope for line ups of new green field development. Situational Analysis for the complex offshore system is defined as robust investigation of the surrounding facts/realities to scrutinize the unique features in terms of capabilities, risks, uncertainty, opportunity, and exposures. The approach followed in the paper is the creation of mathematical model for the network/infrastructure embedded with business rules and deployment for evaluation and optimization. This approach is to timely deliver the management decisions for developing sequencing strategy, establishing priority of supply guidelines and allocation principles. This paper describes that a state of art approach which was followed by developing end to end network model by simulation engineers with close collaboration with strategic planning, portfolio optimization and including operations in single platform. The simulation model was further validated and deployed to analyze current network impediments in terms of technical and commercial allocation principles. The modelling approach was kept straightforward and scalable to allow for the future development if any. Analytics of the modelling could assist in gauging the potentials for enhancing system capacity by implementing appropriate reforms to optimize evacuation strategies. Obstacles across system architecture could be estimated and its reconfiguration was planned by means of variations in operating philosophy, alterations in the network assembly with appropriate debottlenecking recommendation. The allocation principles applied during business plans consider the commercial element on initial basis, before instead the physical and technical constraints were evaluated. The results of the allocation were then simulated and reallocated back to relevant demand center with relevant technical constraints of the network. This enabled team to identify the gap for supply/demand and propose solution to address the gap at an enterprise level to be substantial, to build a case whereby monetization of green fields will be necessary. Above methodology describes how by developing an end to end mathematical model that
本文通过对复杂海上设施进行情景分析,以识别新的碳氢化合物分子,建立了绿色油田开发的适当顺序和货币化策略。作为复杂网络的谨慎运营商,至关重要的是追求战略思想和创新概念,以优化供需平衡,履行合同义务,优化资源,最大限度地创造价值,同时保护绿色油田开发中油气货币化的投资决策。因此,有必要通过稳健的评估来实施成功的商业计划,并对新领域进行适当的排序,以破译痛点,从而通过更好地了解新绿色领域开发的网络特征、供应分布和操作范围来实现最佳解决方案。对于复杂的海上系统,情景分析被定义为对周围事实/现实进行强有力的调查,以仔细检查能力、风险、不确定性、机会和风险方面的独特特征。本文采用的方法是为嵌入业务规则和部署的网络/基础设施创建数学模型,以进行评估和优化。这种方法是为了及时提供管理决策,以制定排序战略,建立优先供应指导方针和分配原则。本文描述了一种最先进的方法,由仿真工程师开发端到端网络模型,与战略规划、组合优化和包括单平台操作密切合作。进一步验证了仿真模型,并从技术和商业分配原则两方面对当前网络障碍进行了分析。建模方法保持直接和可扩展,以允许未来的开发(如果有的话)。对模型的分析可以通过实施适当的改革来优化疏散策略,从而帮助衡量提高系统能力的潜力。系统架构上的障碍可以通过操作理念的变化、网络组合的改变和适当的去瓶颈建议来估计和规划其重构。在商业计划中应用的分配原则在最初的基础上考虑商业因素,而不是评估物理和技术限制。然后对分配结果进行模拟,并根据网络的相关技术约束条件,将分配结果重新分配回相应的需求中心。这使团队能够确定供需差距,并提出解决方案,以解决企业层面的巨大差距,从而建立一个必要的绿色领域货币化的案例。上述方法描述了如何通过开发端到端数学模型来总结复杂海上系统的微观细节,从而促进对新油田开发路线的分析和战略制定。新颖之处在于,仿真模型建立在一个单一的平台上,允许从不同的元素,如油田,设施,管道,上述方法详细阐述了结果问题方法,该方法通过确定CAPEX /OPEX优化来引导和倡导对新油田排序的情景分析,该方法可以指导在两年内以适当的网络强度排列四个新油田的决策,并具有最佳的货币化。
{"title":"Situational Analysis of Complex Offshore Network for Strategizing Sequence for Green Field Development","authors":"Sukrut Shridhar Kulkarni, Marliana Bt Mohammad, Sharifah Nooraini Bt Syed Tahir, Frankie Kia Yong Tan, M. Supu","doi":"10.2118/200933-ms","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2118/200933-ms","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 This paper establishes the approach to strategize the appropriate sequencing and monetization of the green field development through performing situational analysis for the complex offshore facilities to recognize new hydrocarbon molecules. As prudent operator for the complex network its crucial to pursue strategic ideas and innovative concepts to optimize supply demand balance, fulfill contractual obligations to optimize resources to maximize value creation, whilst protecting investment decisions for hydrocarbon monetization for the green field development. It is therefore necessary to implement successful business plans with appropriate sequencing of new fields by robust assessment to decipher the pain points to achieve optimal solution by gaining better understanding of network characteristic, supply distribution and operating envelope for line ups of new green field development.\u0000 Situational Analysis for the complex offshore system is defined as robust investigation of the surrounding facts/realities to scrutinize the unique features in terms of capabilities, risks, uncertainty, opportunity, and exposures. The approach followed in the paper is the creation of mathematical model for the network/infrastructure embedded with business rules and deployment for evaluation and optimization. This approach is to timely deliver the management decisions for developing sequencing strategy, establishing priority of supply guidelines and allocation principles.\u0000 This paper describes that a state of art approach which was followed by developing end to end network model by simulation engineers with close collaboration with strategic planning, portfolio optimization and including operations in single platform. The simulation model was further validated and deployed to analyze current network impediments in terms of technical and commercial allocation principles. The modelling approach was kept straightforward and scalable to allow for the future development if any. Analytics of the modelling could assist in gauging the potentials for enhancing system capacity by implementing appropriate reforms to optimize evacuation strategies. Obstacles across system architecture could be estimated and its reconfiguration was planned by means of variations in operating philosophy, alterations in the network assembly with appropriate debottlenecking recommendation.\u0000 The allocation principles applied during business plans consider the commercial element on initial basis, before instead the physical and technical constraints were evaluated. The results of the allocation were then simulated and reallocated back to relevant demand center with relevant technical constraints of the network. This enabled team to identify the gap for supply/demand and propose solution to address the gap at an enterprise level to be substantial, to build a case whereby monetization of green fields will be necessary.\u0000 Above methodology describes how by developing an end to end mathematical model that","PeriodicalId":11142,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, June 30, 2021","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89372433","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Carbon Dioxide Sequestration and Drainage in Saline Aquifer 含盐含水层的二氧化碳固存与排放
Pub Date : 2021-06-28 DOI: 10.2118/200911-ms
E. Ennin
Geological storage of CO2 in saline aquifers is recognized as a favorable technique that could deliver a significant decrease in CO2 emissions over the short to medium-term. However, the major risk is the possibility of leakage and injection limitation due to pore pressure. This research investigates the three major mechanisms of CO2 trapping to determine which method safely captures the most CO2, interrogates the pore pressure effect on storage, and compares traditional core flooding methods for CO2 storage with CO2 drainage which is more practical in the aquifer. A core flooding set up was built to replicate reservoir conditions of the Anadarko Basin in Texas, USA. The research involved three reservoir pay zone rocks obtained from depths of about 7687ft that were pieced together to undergo core flooding at 4400psi-5200psi and a temperature of 168°F. In the first study conducted the core was flooded with supercritical CO2 and brine of salinity 4000ppm to generate relative permeability curves to represent drainage and imbibition. For the duration of the 3rd, 4th, and 5th studies the core saturated with brine is flooded with CO2 at pressures of 4400psi, 4800psi, and 5200psi. Parameters like the volume of CO2 captured, connate water volumes, differential pressure, Ph of produced water, trapping efficiency, relative permeability, and fractional flow curves are noted. After scrutinizing the result it is observed that the highest volume of CO2 is captured by solubility trapping followed by structural trapping and residual trapping in that order. From this research, it can be concluded that CO2 trapping, at least for these reservoir rocks, is not affected by pore pressure. Also contrary to most practices CO2 storage is best replaced in the laboratory using drainage experiments instead of the widely used relative permeability approach.
在含盐含水层中地质储存二氧化碳被认为是一种有利的技术,可以在中短期内显著减少二氧化碳的排放。然而,主要的风险是由于孔隙压力导致的泄漏和注入限制的可能性。本文研究了二氧化碳捕获的三种主要机制,以确定哪种方法能安全捕获最多的二氧化碳,探讨了孔隙压力对封存的影响,并比较了传统的岩心驱油封存方法和更适用于含水层的二氧化碳排水方法。为了模拟美国德克萨斯州Anadarko盆地的油藏条件,建立了岩心驱油装置。该研究涉及从约7687英尺深处获得的三个储层产层岩石,这些岩石被拼凑在一起,在4400psi-5200psi和168°F的温度下进行岩心驱油。在第一次研究中,岩心被超临界CO2和盐度为4000ppm的盐水淹没,以生成相对渗透率曲线,以表示排水和渗吸。在第三、第四和第五次研究中,在4400psi、4800psi和5200psi的压力下,将饱和盐水岩心注入二氧化碳。捕获的二氧化碳体积、原生水体积、压差、采出水的Ph值、捕获效率、相对渗透率和分流曲线等参数都被记录下来。在仔细检查结果后,观察到最大体积的CO2被溶解度捕获,其次是结构捕获和剩余捕获。从本研究可以得出结论,至少对于这些储集岩来说,CO2的捕集不受孔隙压力的影响。此外,与大多数做法相反,最好在实验室中使用排水实验代替广泛使用的相对渗透率方法来替代二氧化碳储存。
{"title":"Carbon Dioxide Sequestration and Drainage in Saline Aquifer","authors":"E. Ennin","doi":"10.2118/200911-ms","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2118/200911-ms","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Geological storage of CO2 in saline aquifers is recognized as a favorable technique that could deliver a significant decrease in CO2 emissions over the short to medium-term. However, the major risk is the possibility of leakage and injection limitation due to pore pressure. This research investigates the three major mechanisms of CO2 trapping to determine which method safely captures the most CO2, interrogates the pore pressure effect on storage, and compares traditional core flooding methods for CO2 storage with CO2 drainage which is more practical in the aquifer.\u0000 A core flooding set up was built to replicate reservoir conditions of the Anadarko Basin in Texas, USA. The research involved three reservoir pay zone rocks obtained from depths of about 7687ft that were pieced together to undergo core flooding at 4400psi-5200psi and a temperature of 168°F. In the first study conducted the core was flooded with supercritical CO2 and brine of salinity 4000ppm to generate relative permeability curves to represent drainage and imbibition. For the duration of the 3rd, 4th, and 5th studies the core saturated with brine is flooded with CO2 at pressures of 4400psi, 4800psi, and 5200psi. Parameters like the volume of CO2 captured, connate water volumes, differential pressure, Ph of produced water, trapping efficiency, relative permeability, and fractional flow curves are noted.\u0000 After scrutinizing the result it is observed that the highest volume of CO2 is captured by solubility trapping followed by structural trapping and residual trapping in that order. From this research, it can be concluded that CO2 trapping, at least for these reservoir rocks, is not affected by pore pressure. Also contrary to most practices CO2 storage is best replaced in the laboratory using drainage experiments instead of the widely used relative permeability approach.","PeriodicalId":11142,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, June 30, 2021","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88587113","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Seed Extracts as Natural, Green, Non-Toxic Corrosion Inhibitors 种子提取物是天然、绿色、无毒的腐蚀抑制剂
Pub Date : 2020-10-19 DOI: 10.2118/200935-MS
J. H. Ng, Tariq Almubarak, H. Nasr-El-Din
Acid treatments are commonly used in the oilfield to remove inorganic scale or to stimulate formatio ns. These treatments typically consist of using hydrochloric acid (HCl), acetic acid, formic acid, or chelating agents. At elevated temperatures, these acids are highly corrosive and can cause severe damage to tubulars as well as downhole equipment. To reduce damage from these acids, corrosion inhibitors are added to the treatment solution. Corrosion inhibitors used in the oil and gas industry are typically quaternary amines or sulfur-containing compounds. These compounds adsorb to the surface of the metal, thereby reducing contact between the metal surface and the corrosive substance. However, these corrosion inhibitors are damaging to the environment and harmful to human health. Alternative new environmentally-friendly corrosion inhibitors are also either toxic to the human body or face performance limitations at higher temperature field applications. To develop new environmentally friendly and non-toxic corrosion inhibitors for high-temperature applications, 15 edible seeds were tested as alternative sources of corrosion inhibitors. In order to determine the inhibition effect of 15 different seeds, N-80 and S13Cr coupons were exposed to 15 wt.% HCl solutions at temperatures between 77-250°F with 2 wt.% of grounded seed added for 6 hours. In addition, a control solution containing no corrosion inhibitor was used to establish a corrosion rate for a base case. This paper will show the results of such seeds and attempt to provide an awareness of natural seeds extract for use as corrosion inhibitors in conjunction with well acid treatments. It was noted that out of the 15 seeds, seeds 1 and 2 were found to perform the best at these conditions, exhibiting more than 90% corrosion inhibition efficiency. Seed 4 was observed to perform the worst, exhibiting only 16.8% inhibition efficiency. At 150°F, 2 wt.% of seeds 1 and 2 were tested with seed 1 achieving a corrosion rate of 0.00253 lb/ft2 while seed 2 was unable to provide sufficient inhibition with a corrosion rate of 0.153 lb/ft2. The control solution was found to have a corrosion rate of 0.371 lb/ft2 over the 6 hours at 150°F. Seed 1 was further tested at 200°F with the addition of corrosion inhibitor intensifiers and resulted in a corrosion rate of 0.00087 lb/ft2, while at 250°F, a corrosion rate of 0.00811 lb/ft2 was observed. The tests using S13Cr also showed that seed 1 worked well as a corrosion inhibitor for CRAs. The thermal degradation of seed 1 was also examined using NMR. These results show a new naturally occurring, green, non-toxic, high-temperature applicable corrosion inhibitor that can be developed from edible seeds.
在油田中,酸处理通常用于去除无机结垢或增产。这些处理通常包括使用盐酸(HCl)、乙酸、甲酸或螯合剂。在高温下,这些酸具有很强的腐蚀性,可能对管柱和井下设备造成严重损害。为了减少这些酸的损害,在处理溶液中加入了缓蚀剂。石油和天然气工业中使用的缓蚀剂通常是季胺或含硫化合物。这些化合物吸附在金属表面,从而减少金属表面与腐蚀性物质之间的接触。然而,这些缓蚀剂对环境有害,对人体健康有害。替代的新型环保型缓蚀剂要么对人体有毒,要么在高温场应用中面临性能限制。为了开发新的环保无毒的高温缓蚀剂,研究人员测试了15种可食用种子作为缓蚀剂的替代来源。为了确定15种不同种子的抑制效果,将N-80和S13Cr样品暴露于15 wt.%的HCl溶液中,温度在77-250°F之间,加入2 wt.%的磨碎种子,持续6小时。此外,使用不含缓蚀剂的控制溶液来确定基本情况下的腐蚀速率。本文将展示这种种子的结果,并试图提供天然种子提取物作为腐蚀抑制剂与井酸处理相结合的认识。结果表明,15种种子中,种子1和种子2在这些条件下的缓蚀效果最好,缓蚀效率达到90%以上。种子4表现最差,抑制率仅为16.8%。在150°F时,2 wt.%的种子1和2进行了测试,其中种子1的腐蚀速率为0.00253 lb/ft2,而种子2无法提供足够的缓蚀作用,腐蚀速率为0.153 lb/ft2。在150°F温度下,控制溶液在6小时内的腐蚀速率为0.371 lb/ft2。在200°F的温度下,在加入缓蚀剂的情况下,Seed 1的腐蚀速率为0.00087 lb/ft2,而在250°F的温度下,腐蚀速率为0.00811 lb/ft2。用S13Cr进行的试验也表明,种子1作为CRAs的缓蚀剂效果良好。利用核磁共振对种子1号的热降解进行了研究。这些结果显示了一种新的天然、绿色、无毒、高温适用的可食用种子缓蚀剂。
{"title":"Seed Extracts as Natural, Green, Non-Toxic Corrosion Inhibitors","authors":"J. H. Ng, Tariq Almubarak, H. Nasr-El-Din","doi":"10.2118/200935-MS","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2118/200935-MS","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Acid treatments are commonly used in the oilfield to remove inorganic scale or to stimulate formatio ns. These treatments typically consist of using hydrochloric acid (HCl), acetic acid, formic acid, or chelating agents. At elevated temperatures, these acids are highly corrosive and can cause severe damage to tubulars as well as downhole equipment. To reduce damage from these acids, corrosion inhibitors are added to the treatment solution.\u0000 Corrosion inhibitors used in the oil and gas industry are typically quaternary amines or sulfur-containing compounds. These compounds adsorb to the surface of the metal, thereby reducing contact between the metal surface and the corrosive substance. However, these corrosion inhibitors are damaging to the environment and harmful to human health. Alternative new environmentally-friendly corrosion inhibitors are also either toxic to the human body or face performance limitations at higher temperature field applications. To develop new environmentally friendly and non-toxic corrosion inhibitors for high-temperature applications, 15 edible seeds were tested as alternative sources of corrosion inhibitors.\u0000 In order to determine the inhibition effect of 15 different seeds, N-80 and S13Cr coupons were exposed to 15 wt.% HCl solutions at temperatures between 77-250°F with 2 wt.% of grounded seed added for 6 hours. In addition, a control solution containing no corrosion inhibitor was used to establish a corrosion rate for a base case.\u0000 This paper will show the results of such seeds and attempt to provide an awareness of natural seeds extract for use as corrosion inhibitors in conjunction with well acid treatments. It was noted that out of the 15 seeds, seeds 1 and 2 were found to perform the best at these conditions, exhibiting more than 90% corrosion inhibition efficiency. Seed 4 was observed to perform the worst, exhibiting only 16.8% inhibition efficiency. At 150°F, 2 wt.% of seeds 1 and 2 were tested with seed 1 achieving a corrosion rate of 0.00253 lb/ft2 while seed 2 was unable to provide sufficient inhibition with a corrosion rate of 0.153 lb/ft2. The control solution was found to have a corrosion rate of 0.371 lb/ft2 over the 6 hours at 150°F. Seed 1 was further tested at 200°F with the addition of corrosion inhibitor intensifiers and resulted in a corrosion rate of 0.00087 lb/ft2, while at 250°F, a corrosion rate of 0.00811 lb/ft2 was observed. The tests using S13Cr also showed that seed 1 worked well as a corrosion inhibitor for CRAs. The thermal degradation of seed 1 was also examined using NMR.\u0000 These results show a new naturally occurring, green, non-toxic, high-temperature applicable corrosion inhibitor that can be developed from edible seeds.","PeriodicalId":11142,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, June 30, 2021","volume":"207 2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85629591","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Day 3 Wed, June 30, 2021
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1