Diabetes Therapy最新文献

Introduction: Screening for islet-specific autoantibodies can identify individuals at risk for type 1 diabetes (T1D). Despite calls for increased nationwide autoantibody screening efforts, it is unclear how many individuals have participated in screening among people who may benefit from it. Moreover, knowledge and perceptions of autoantibody screening in real-world samples are not well understood.

Methods: We surveyed a sample of individuals (aged 18+ years old) from T1D Exchange Registry with a personal or family history of T1D to assess their self-reported T1D autoantibody knowledge, experiences, and attitudes. Participants belonged to one of three groups: adults with T1D who had a biological child without T1D or future plans for a child (PWD); parents without T1D who had a biological child with T1D and one or more biological children without T1D (Caregivers); and first-degree adult children or siblings to a person with T1D (Relatives). Descriptive analyses (means, standard deviations, frequencies) are presented by participant groups.

Results: A total of 510 participants enrolled in the study. Across groups, participants reported feeling a little to somewhat knowledgeable about autoantibody screening and positive perceptions of autoantibody screening in general. However, few participants had screened their child without T1D (PWDs, 21.94%; Caregivers, 46.30%) or themselves (Relatives, 19.23%). Among those who had screened, participants reported generally positive experiences. Among those who had not screened, many participants were "undecided" about autoantibody screening (PWD, 38.46%; Caregivers, 40.52%; Relatives, 44.44%). Influences reported for participants' decisions to screen, not screen, or their current indecision differed by group: PWDs (21.70%) and Caregivers (26.87%) most often reported self-initiated research as an influence and Relatives reported they had not previously considered screening (48.28%).

Conclusion: Results highlight the need for more accessible information about screening, including real experiences from those who have screened.

Diabetes mellitus (DM) significantly impairs patients' quality of life, primarily because of its complications, which are the leading cause of mortality among individuals with the disease. Autophagy has emerged as a key process closely associated with DM, including its complications such as diabetic nephropathy (DN). DN is a major complication of DM, contributing significantly to chronic kidney disease and renal failure. The intricate connection between autophagy and DM, including DN, highlights the potential for new therapeutic targets. This review examines the interplay between autophagy and these conditions, aiming to uncover novel approaches to treatment and enhance our understanding of their underlying pathophysiology. It also explores the role of autophagy in maintaining renal homeostasis and its involvement in the development and progression of DM and DN. Furthermore, the review discusses natural compounds that may alleviate these conditions by modulating autophagy.

Introduction: This study aimed to determine the relationship between HbA_1c variability and foot ulcer healing at 12 weeks and 12 months.

Methods: Using National Diabetic Foot Care Audit (NDFA) and hospital records, demographics, baseline ulcer characteristics and healing outcomes for subjects presenting with a foot ulcer between 2017-2022 were collected at 12 weeks and 12 months. Subjects had diabetes duration > 3 years and ≥ 3 HbA_1c recordings in the 5 years prior to presentation.

Results: At 12 weeks, factors associated with an active ulcer were presence on hind foot (adjusted odds ratios) (2.1 [95% CI 1.3-3.7]), ischaemia (2.1 [95% CI:1.4-3.2]), area > 1 cm² (2.7 [95% CI:1.7-4.2]) and diabetes duration > 24 years vs 3-10 (AOR 2.0 [95% CI 1.2-3.5]). After adjustment, HbA_1c variability 6-10 mmol/mol and > 14.5 mmol/mol had AOR of 1.76 (95% CI 1.1-2.8; p = 0.0192) and 1.5 (95% CI 0.9-2.6; p = 0.1148) of an active ulcer at 12 weeks vs variability < 6 mmol/mol. At 12 months, ischaemia (AOR 2.4 [95% CI 1.5-3.8]) and diabetes duration > 24 years vs 3-10 years (AOR 3.3 [95% CI 1.7-6.4] were significant factors. HbA_1c variability was not significant at 12 months.

Conclusion: In keeping with the national NDFA data, in our cohort ulcer characteristics, but not HbA_1c variability, were the key factors associated with ulcer healing at 12 weeks and 12 months.

Neonatal diabetes mellitus is a rare disorder of glucose metabolism with onset within the first 6 months of life. The initial treatment is based on insulin infusion. The technologies for diabetes treatment can be very helpful, even if guidelines are still lacking. The current study aimed to provide a comprehensive review of the literature about the safety and efficacy of insulin treatment with technology for diabetes to support clinicians in the management of infants with neonatal diabetes mellitus. A total of 22 papers were included, most of them case reports or case series. The first infants with neonatal diabetes mellitus treated with insulin pumps were described nearly two decades ago. Over the years, continuous glucose monitoring systems were added to treat these individuals, allowing for a better customization of insulin administration. Insulin was diluted in some cases to further minimize the doses. Improvement in technology for diabetes prompted clinicians to use new devices and algorithms for insulin delivery in infants with neonatal diabetes as well. These systems are safe and effective, may shorten hospital stay, and help clinicians weaning insulin during the remission phase in the transient forms or switching from insulin to sulfonylurea when suggested by the molecular diagnosis. New technologies for insulin delivery in infants with neonatal diabetes can be used safely and closed-loop algorithms can work properly in these situations, optimizing blood glucose control.

Introduction

We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pioglitazone/metformin fixed-dose combination (FDC) versus uptitrated metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) without adequate glycemic control.

Methods

A total of 304 patients were recruited from 15 hospitals in China and randomly assigned (1:1) to the test group (pioglitazone/metformin FDC, 15/500 mg) or the control group (uptitrated metformin, 2000–2500 mg/day). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) ≤ 6.5% and ≤ 7.0% at week 16. The secondary outcomes included the change from baseline in glucose, serum lipids, and liver function. Full analysis set (FAS) and per-protocol set (PPS) were used for analyses.

Results

In the test group, 103 (69.59%) patients reached HbA1c ≤ 7.0% (FAS, P = 0.009), with 68 (45.95%) patients achieved HbA1c ≤ 6.5 (FAS, P = 0.043). More reduction in HbA1c, homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance, and diastolic pressure was found. Bodyweight, body mass index, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol increased markedly. The changes of triglycerides, alanine transaminase, aspartate aminotransferase, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein decreased noticeably. There were no significant differences in rates of adverse events between the two groups.

Conclusions

Pioglitazone/metformin FDC was superior to uptitrated metformin among patients with T2DM without adequate glycemic control.

Trial Registration Number

This trial is registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1900028606).

Introduction

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of baseline body mass index (BMI) and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) on the effectiveness and safety of initiating iGlarLixi (insulin glargine 100 U/ml and lixisenatide) in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in routine clinical practice.

Methods

We pooled patient-level data from 1406 people with inadequately controlled T2D, initiating a 24-week iGlarLixi treatment. Analysis sets were based on baseline BMI and HbA1c. In the BMI set, 894 (64%) people had a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m² and 510 (36%) a BMI < 30 kg/m²; in the HbA1c set, 615 (44%) people had an HbA1c >9%, 491 (35%) between 8 and 9%, and 298 (21%) < 8%.

Results

After initiating iGlarLixi, HbA1c decreased in all participants, with the greatest least-squares mean reduction at 2.15% from baseline to week 24 in those with baseline HbA1c > 9% (using a mixed model for repeated measures). Overall, mean ± standard deviation body weight decreased by 1.9 ± 4.8 kg, with the most prominent loss of 2.6 ± 4.9 kg recorded in people presenting with obesity. Reported hypoglycemia rates were low across all groups.

Conclusions

Initiation of iGlarLixi in people with uncontrolled T2D is effective and safe in clinical practice, across different baseline HbA1c and BMI categories.

Obesity is both a major risk factor for diabetes and a serious comorbidity of the condition. The twin epidemics of obesity and diabetes have spread globally over the past few decades. Treatment of obesity in patients with diabetes provides a host of clinical benefits that encompass virtually all body systems. Despite this, multiple lines of evidence suggest that the efficacy of most therapies for weight loss is significantly reduced among patients with diabetes. With this background, we summarize the evidence of a differential effect of lifestyle, pharmacological, and surgical treatments for obesity in patients with existing diabetes, and explore the potential mechanisms involved in this phenomenon. This information is then used to formulate strategies to improve weight loss outcomes for patients with diabetes.

Introduction

Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), particularly those from historically marginalized racial and ethnic groups, are at high risk of poor outcomes from metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Evidence-based management (EBM) of MASLD can prevent its progression to cirrhosis and poor outcomes, yet rates of EBM of MASLD are low in T2D.

Methods

In this pilot study of ten participants, we examined the feasibility and acceptability of a telehealth intervention that delivered EBM of MASLD in Latino/a and Black patients with T2D in the Duke Healthcare System. The intervention included: (a) MASLD education; (b) diet/lifestyle counseling; (c) T2D medication adjustment (i.e., to promote liver health) and (d) ordering of clinically indicated tests and referrals. This 3-month intervention was delivered by an endocrinologist over three virtual study visits. Phone interviews were conducted at study conclusion. We examined rates of recruitment, retention, T2D medication adjustment, and ordering of clinically indicated tests/referrals.

Results

The median age of our cohort was 54.0 (44.0, 59.0); six and four participants self-identified as Latino/a ethnicity and Black race, respectively. Retention rate in this study was 100% (n = 10/10), and all scheduled visits were completed (n = 30/30). Recruitment occurred over one month, and the rate was 25.8% (n = 8/31) by telephone call and 10% (n = 2/20) by electronic health record message. The intervention was highly acceptable based on a median Treatment Acceptability and Preferences score of 4.0 (4.0, 4.0). In exit interviews, all participants reported improved understanding of MASLD and its link to diabetes. All participants received T2D medication adjustment (n = 5/10) and/or clinically indicated testing/referral (n = 10/10) for the purpose of improving MASLD.

Conclusions

We demonstrated that a telehealth intervention designed to proactively deliver EBM of MASLD was feasible and acceptable in a cohort of Latino/a and Black patients with T2D. Opportunities existed to better align each participants’ care with guideline-based care of MASLD.

From clinical trials and observational data, oral semaglutide has proven to be the most effective second-line oral therapy for the management of patients with type 2 diabetes. This review aims to describe the perspective of an Italian expert panel that addressed the potential challenges arising during the use of oral semaglutide in the free-living conditions of routine clinical care. A group of Italian experts discussed and generated insights into the use of oral semaglutide in clinical practice. Key topics included the effectiveness of oral semaglutide in clinical practice, the positioning of the agent to optimize the treatment benefits, the possibility to adopt flexibility in the administration schedule, critical issues encountered, the role of patient communication and information in the importance of dose escalation and management of adverse events. Available data on efficacy and effectiveness of oral semaglutide from randomized clinical trials and real-world studies were reported, along with factors that determine tolerability and persistence on treatment. The debate over a fixed versus a flexible dosing schedule was critically addressed, providing anecdotical clues from a small case series and a real-world database. Additionally, a set of recommendations for clinicians to consider when prescribing oral semaglutide and during the process of patient monitoring were provided.

Introduction: Country-specific evidence-based research is crucial for understanding the role of nonnutritive sweeteners (NNS) in managing type 2 diabetes (T2D). The main aim of this study was to explore the effect of replacing sucrose with sucralose in coffee/tea in Asian Indians with type 2 diabetes (T2D).

Methods: This 12-week, parallel-arm randomized controlled trial included 210 participants with T2D, assigned to the intervention group, where sugar/sucrose in coffee or tea was substituted with sucralose, or the control group, where sugar/sucrose was continued. Lifestyle factors remained unchanged. The primary outcome was change in HbA1c. Secondary outcomes were changes in body weight (BW), body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), lipid profiles, and inflammatory markers.

Results: At the end of 12 weeks, no change was observed in HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose, lipid profile, and inflammatory markers between or within groups. There was a small but significant reduction in BW (- 0.5 kg [95% CI - 1.0, - 0.1]; p = 0.02), BMI (- 0.2 kg/m² [- 0.4, 0.0]; p = 0.03), and WC (- 0.8 cm [- 1.4, - 0.3]; p = 0.002) in the intervention group. Improvements were also observed in lipid accumulation product (p = 0.01), visceral adiposity index (p = 0.04), triglyceride/glucose index (p = 0.04), total energy intake (p = 0.04), and carbohydrate intake (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions: In Asian Indians with T2D, replacing about 60 kcal of added sucrose with sucralose in coffee/ tea had no benefit on glycemia but resulted in a small reduction in body weight, body mass index, and waist circumference.

Trial registration: Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI/2021/04/032686).