Diabetes Therapy最新文献

Introduction: Microvascular and macrovascular complications in type 1 diabetes (T1D) may be linked to endothelial stress due to glycaemic variability. Continuous glucose monitoring systems (CGMs) provide new opportunities to quantify this variability, utilising the amplitude of glucose change summated over time. The aim of this study was to examine whether this determination of glucose variability (GV) is associated with microvascular clinical sequelae.

Methods: Continuous glucose monitoring values were downloaded for 89 type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) individuals for up to 18 months from 2021 to 2023. Data for patient demographics was also taken from the patient record which included Sex, Date of Birth, and Date of Diagnosis. The recorded laboratory glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) test results were also recorded. The glucose management index (GMI) was calculated from average glucose readings for 18 months using the formula GMI (%) = (0.82-(Average glucose/100)). This was then adjusted to give GMI (mmol/mol) = 10.929 * (GMI (%) - 2.15). Average Glucose Fluctuation (AGF) was calculated by adding up the total absolute change value between all recorded results over 18 months and dividing by the number of results minus one. The % Above Critical Threshold (ACT) was calculated by summing the total number of occurrences for each result value. A cumulative 95% limit was then applied to identify the glucose value that only 5% of results exceeded in the overall population. Using this value, we estimated the percentage of total tests that were above the Critical Threshold (ACT).

Results: Results for the 89 individuals (44 men and 45 women) were analysed over 18 months. The mean age of participants was 43 years and the mean duration of diabetes was 18 years. A total of 3.22 million readings were analysed, giving an average of 10.3 mmol/L blood glucose. Those with the largest change in glucose from reading to reading, summated over time, showed the greatest change in eGFR of 3.12 ml/min/1.73 m² (p = 0.007). People with a higher proportion of glucose readings > 18 mmol/L showed a fall in eGFR of 2.8 ml/min/1.73 m² (p = 0.009) and experienced higher rates of sight-threatening retinopathy (44% of these individuals) (p = 0.01) as did 39% of individuals in the highest tertile of glucose levels (p = 0.008).

Conclusion: Those individuals with T1D in the highest tertile of reading-to-reading glucose change showed the greatest change in eGFR. Those with a higher proportion of glucose readings > 18 mmol/L also showed a fall in eGFR and experienced higher rates of sight-threatening retinopathy, as did people with higher mean glucose. Discussions with T1D individuals could reflect on how the percentage recorded glucose above a critical level and degree of change in glucose are important in avoiding future tissue complications.

Introduction: Imeglimin is a first-in-class, novel, oral glucose-lowering agent for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. The efficacy and safety of imeglimin as an antidiabetic agent have been investigated in clinical trials. However, its metabolic effects in humans have not yet been fully elucidated.

Methods: The Study to InveStIgate the Metabolic Action of Imeglimin on patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (SISIMAI) is a single-arm intervention study. In this study, we have recruited 25 patients with type 2 diabetes to receive 2000 mg/day imeglimin for 20 weeks. We perform a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) with double-glucose tracers, a two-step hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp with glucose tracer, ectopic fat measurement by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy, visceral/subcutaneous fat area measurement by magnetic resonance imaging, muscle biopsy, and evaluation of fitness level by cycle ergometer before and after imeglimin administration.

Planned outcomes: The primary outcome is the change in area under the curve of glucose levels during the OGTT after 20 weeks of imeglimin treatment. We also calculate the endogenous glucose production, rate of oral glucose appearance, and rate of glucose disappearance from the data during the 75-g OGTT and compare them between pre- and post-treatment. Additionally, we will compare other parameters, such as the changes in tissue-specific insulin sensitivity, ectopic fat accumulation, visceral/subcutaneous fat area accumulation, and fitness level between each point. This is the first study to investigate the organ-specific metabolic action of imeglimin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus using the 75-g OGTT with the double tracer method. The results of this study are expected to provide useful information for drug selection based on the pathophysiology of individual patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Trial registration: jRCTs031210600.

Peripheral neuropathy (PN) significantly impacts the quality of life, causing substantial morbidity and increased mortality, as well as escalating healthcare costs. While PN can have various causes, the most common form, diabetic peripheral neuropathy, poses considerable risks for potential complications. Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) affects over 50% of people with prediabetes and diabetes. Despite its prevalence, a global gap in diagnosis and management exists, exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. This expert consensus was formulated through a comprehensive evaluation by a panel of experts, informed by a focused literature review, aiming to establish a clinically robust approach to diagnosing and managing pre- and diabetic PN with the early utilization of neurotropic B vitamins. This document offers a consensus perspective on the existing challenges in diagnosing and managing PN, focusing on DPN. The expert panel proposes measures to address this underdiagnosed burden, highlighting the importance of early intervention through innovative screening methods, integrated care approaches, and therapeutic strategies. The document advocates for increased awareness, targeted campaigns, and proactive care strategies to bridge gaps in the patient care of individuals with diabetes, emphasizing the importance of early detection and timely management to improve overall health outcomes. Specific recommendations include incorporating simplified questionnaires and innovative screening methods into routine care, prioritizing neurotropic B vitamin supplementation, optimizing glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist treatments, and adopting a holistic approach to neuropathy management. The consensus underscores the urgent need to address the underdiagnosis and undertreatment of PN, offering practical measures to enhance early detection and improve health outcomes for individuals with DPN.

Introduction: When switching from premixed insulin to insulin degludec/aspart (IDegAsp), IDegAsp usually starts at the same dose as the premixed insulin according to limited clinical experience or at a dose according to clinician discretion. The dose of insulin degludec used in the real world after switching has been poorly investigated.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with type 2 diabetes who switched from premixed insulin to IDegAsp from October 2016 to December 2023. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to compare changes in insulin dose, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting blood glucose (FBG), and postprandial blood glucose (PBG) before and after switching.

Results: Sixty-six patients with prior low-ratio premixed insulin and 22 with prior mid-ratio premixed insulin were included. Among the low-ratio insulin users, the total daily dose of insulin degludec (IDeg) decreased by 21.43% and 19.05% at 3 and 6 months, respectively, after switching, compared with prior basal insulin dose (both p < 0.001). Conversely, among mid-ratio insulin users, the IDeg daily dose increased by 10.71% and 32.14% at 3 and 6 months, respectively, after switching, compared with prior basal insulin dose (both p < 0.001). In all patients, HbA1c levels decreased by 0.70%, FBG decreased by 1.00 mmol/l, and PBG decreased by 1.61 mmol/l after 6 months of switching (all p < 0.05); the total daily insulin dose and injection frequency significantly decreased after switching (both p < 0.05); age and disease duration did not affect IDegAsp effects on HbA1c reduction.

Conclusions: In the setting of transition to IDegAsp from premixed insulin, the dose of basal insulin in the premixed formulation can be a valuable reference for adjusting insulin degludec dose. IDegAsp is superior to premixed insulin in blood glucose control with reduced total daily dose and injection frequency. IDegAsp could be the best choice for the management of diabetes in elderly patients.

Introduction: Previous studies have shown that iGlarLixi, a fixed-ratio combination of insulin glargine 100 U/ml and lixisenatide, provides effective glycemic control in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). The SIMPLIFY Japan study assessed the impact of switching from multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) to once-daily iGlarLixi on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and glycemic parameters in Japanese people with moderately controlled T2D.

Methods: This 24-week, prospective, observational cohort study enrolled Japanese adults with T2D who switched from MDI therapy to iGlarLixi. Data were collected at baseline, 12, and 24 weeks; changes in Diabetes Therapy-Related Quality of Life (DTR-QOL) questionnaire score, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), body weight and self-reported treatment adherence were evaluated; the primary endpoint was change in DTR-QOL at 24 weeks.

Results: Sixty-six participants were enrolled and 61 were included in the full analysis set. Significant improvements were observed in total DTR-QOL score from baseline to week 24 (mean change + 10.8 points; P < 0.001), with higher scores observed in individual domains related to social/daily activities, treatment satisfaction, and reductions in treatment-related anxiety (P < 0.05). A small HbA1c increase was noted at week 24 (P < 0.001), while this did not appear to adversely affect HRQOL or treatment satisfaction. A significant reduction in body weight was observed at week 12 (mean change - 0.7 kg; P = 0.046). Self-reported treatment adherence increased from baseline to week 24, with the proportion of participants who never missed an insulin injection increasing from 55.7 to 77.6%. At week 24, the incidence of hypoglycemia and gastrointestinal adverse events was 18.2 and 27.3%, respectively.

Conclusions: Switching from MDI to iGlarLixi therapy in Japanese people with T2D was associated with enhanced HRQOL (despite slight elevation in HbA1c) and improved treatment adherence, with a favorable safety profile. These findings support the beneficial role of iGlarLixi in the management of T2D in real-world Japanese clinical practice.

Study registration: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT1041210151).

Introduction: The aim of this work was to assess the safety and effectiveness of concomitant iGlarLixi and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) use in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) who fasted during Ramadan.

Methods: Of the 420 eligible participants from the SoliRam study, 174 were using SGLT-2i in addition to iGlarLixi and 246 were not using SGLT-2i, referred to as SGLT-2i user and non-user, respectively. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants experiencing ≥ 1 severe and/or symptomatic documented (< 70 mg/dl [< 3.9 mmol/l]) hypoglycemia.

Results: More than 50% of participants in both groups were male. The mean weight, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) were similar in both groups. Approximately half of participants in the SGLT-2i-user group and ~ 25% participants in the SGLT-2i-non-user group were on two oral anti-hyperglycemic drugs (OADs), whereas ~ 20% in the SGLT-2i-user group and ~ 1% of participants in the SGLT-2i-non-user group were on three OADs in addition to iGlarLixi. Around 35% and 55% of participants in the SGLT-2i-user and SGLT-2i-non-user groups, respectively, were taking concurrent sulphonylureas. About 97% of participants in both groups were able to fast for ≥ 25 days. The incidence of primary endpoint was low in both groups; SGLT-2i user: 0.6%, 4.2%, and 0.6% and SGLT-2i-non-user: 1.3%, 0.9% and 0% during pre-Ramadan, Ramadan, and post-Ramadan period, respectively. The incidence of severe and/or symptomatic documented (< 54 mg/dl [< 3.0 mmol/l]) hypoglycemia events was also low throughout the study, including during Ramadan. No severe hypoglycemia occurred during Ramadan in either group. Improvements in HbA1c and FPG, with a small reduction in weight, were observed from pre- to post-Ramadan in both groups. No serious adverse event was reported in either group.

Conclusions: Concomitant iGlarLixi and SGLT-2i therapy with or without other OADs was demonstrated to be safe in adults with T2D during Ramadan fast, with a low risk of hypoglycemia and improvements in glycemic outcomes.

Introduction: Daily insulin administration can be burdensome for people with type 2 diabetes (PwT2D) and can impact treatment adherence. This study investigated preferences for once-weekly, long-acting basal insulin for treatment of PwT2D.

Methods: An online discrete-choice experiment was administered to PwT2D in the USA. Qualitative interviews informed the selection of six attributes: reduction in A1c level after 6 months, amount of time spent in optimal blood sugar range each day, number of serious low blood sugar events, number of nighttime low blood sugar events, change in weight because of the insulin over 6 months, and frequency of administration. Each participant completed eight questions offering a choice between two long-acting insulins; questions varied according to an experimental design. A fixed treatment choice question asked about preferences for daily versus weekly insulin, holding other treatment features constant. Data were analyzed using random-parameters logit models, and heterogeneity was explored through subgroup analyses.

Results: Four hundred sixty-six PwT2D completed the survey (mean age, 57; mean A1c, 7.5%; 59.0% female); 33.3% of these were currently on a basal/bolus regimen, 34.3% used basal only, and 32.4% were insulin naive. Respondents placed the most importance on avoiding a 10-pound weight change and equal importance on the largest change in the number of serious and nighttime low blood sugar events per year and achieving the longest time in range included in the choice questions. There was significant heterogeneity in preferences by experience: insulin-naive respondents had stronger preferences for scheduled and flexible weekly insulin over daily insulin; 67.6% preferred flexible weekly over daily insulin, all else being equal.

Conclusion: PwT2D valued insulin efficacy and reducing treatment-related adverse events, with heterogeneity in the relative importance of administration frequency. All else being equal, respondents preferred weekly over daily basal insulin. These findings provide insights into the preferences of PwT2D considering weekly long-acting insulin.

Despite the growing evidence supporting the outpatient use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) for improving glycaemic control and reducing hypoglycaemia, there is a need for a detailed understanding of the specific features of CGM devices that best meet individual patient needs. This expert opinion, based on a comprehensive literature review and the personal perspectives of clinicians, aims to provide the healthcare professionals (HCPs) with a comprehensive framework for selecting CGM devices. It evaluates the current state of CGM technology, categorizing features into essential features, major drivers of choice, and additional/useful features. Moreover, the practical model presented outlines a patient's journey with CGM, emphasising the importance of aligning device features with patient needs. This includes understanding the patient's lifestyle, clinical conditions, and personal preferences to optimize CGM use and improve diabetes management outcomes.