Diabetes Therapy最新文献

Introduction: This survey assessed the perspectives of physicians, people with diabetes (PWD), and caregivers in Japan regarding initiation barriers and treatment burden associated with insulin therapy, and expectations for new insulin therapies.

Methods: An online survey, conducted May-June 2023, was completed by physicians (n = 411), PWD (type 1 diabetes, n = 108; type 2 diabetes [T2D]: insulin-naive, n = 114; insulin-treated, n = 108), and caregivers (family members, n = 107; nurses, n = 117; care workers, n = 104). Agreement with statements regarding initiation barriers, current feelings, and burden of insulin therapy was assessed. Physicians' views on ideal glycated hemoglobin (HbA_1c) levels and actual levels in PWD at insulin initiation were captured.

Results: Most PWD agreed with the statements "I don't want to be bothered with doing injections" (77.8-92.1%) and "I don't want to inject myself for the rest of my life" (78.7-91.2%). Physicians also considered these factors to be of high importance for PWD; however, physician and PWD (insulin-naive T2D) responses were significantly different for 11 statements. The greatest underestimation by physicians was for the statement "my family will be worried" (41.8% vs. 66.7%), whereas social factors (e.g., "my friendships may suffer," "if I take insulin I will be discriminated against") were overestimated by physicians (49.1% vs. 33.3% and 46.5% vs. 24.6%, respectively). Although > 70% of physicians considered HbA_1c < 9.0% (< 75 mmol/mol) ideal for insulin initiation, only ~ 30% of PWD started insulin at HbA_1c < 9.0% (< 75 mmol/mol). Nurses rated the burden of assisting with insulin injections significantly lower than family members or care workers. Respondents agreed the need for less frequent injections and improved glycemic control were important attributes expected from future insulin therapies.

Conclusion: Differences in perceptions between physicians and PWD in Japan regarding insulin therapy persist, but this gap may be narrowing. Both groups agreed that future insulin therapies should be simpler and provide better glycemic control.

The growing prevalence of overweight/obesity, the persistence of inadequate glycemic control among the majority of affected individuals, and the still unacceptably high risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality among population with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D), impose an urgent need for the introduction of non-insulin glucose-lowering agents in the therapeutic armamentarium. Given that their antihyperglycemic mechanism of action is independent of endogenous insulin secretion and that the observed cardio-renal benefits are unrelated to their glucose-lowering properties, one can speculate that the use of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) could provide benefits in T1D, similar to the ones observed among individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and heart failure. Available evidence from randomized controlled trials suggests that treatment with SGLT2is as adjunct to insulin in T1D results in modest reductions in glycated hemoglobin and body weight. Additionally, SGLT2is ameliorate albuminuria, and thus delay or prevent the development of CKD in T1D. However, use of SGLT2is is associated with an increased risk of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) in T1D. This commentary aims at providing a framework for practical recommendations regarding the potential use of SGLT2is in adults with T1D, based on the individual's risk level for DKA development, the presence of inadequate glycemic control and related cardio-renal complications.

Introduction: Microvascular and macrovascular complications in type 1 diabetes (T1D) may be linked to endothelial stress due to glycaemic variability. Continuous glucose monitoring systems (CGMs) provide new opportunities to quantify this variability, utilising the amplitude of glucose change summated over time. The aim of this study was to examine whether this determination of glucose variability (GV) is associated with microvascular clinical sequelae.

Methods: Continuous glucose monitoring values were downloaded for 89 type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) individuals for up to 18 months from 2021 to 2023. Data for patient demographics was also taken from the patient record which included Sex, Date of Birth, and Date of Diagnosis. The recorded laboratory glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) test results were also recorded. The glucose management index (GMI) was calculated from average glucose readings for 18 months using the formula GMI (%) = (0.82-(Average glucose/100)). This was then adjusted to give GMI (mmol/mol) = 10.929 * (GMI (%) - 2.15). Average Glucose Fluctuation (AGF) was calculated by adding up the total absolute change value between all recorded results over 18 months and dividing by the number of results minus one. The % Above Critical Threshold (ACT) was calculated by summing the total number of occurrences for each result value. A cumulative 95% limit was then applied to identify the glucose value that only 5% of results exceeded in the overall population. Using this value, we estimated the percentage of total tests that were above the Critical Threshold (ACT).

Results: Results for the 89 individuals (44 men and 45 women) were analysed over 18 months. The mean age of participants was 43 years and the mean duration of diabetes was 18 years. A total of 3.22 million readings were analysed, giving an average of 10.3 mmol/L blood glucose. Those with the largest change in glucose from reading to reading, summated over time, showed the greatest change in eGFR of 3.12 ml/min/1.73 m² (p = 0.007). People with a higher proportion of glucose readings > 18 mmol/L showed a fall in eGFR of 2.8 ml/min/1.73 m² (p = 0.009) and experienced higher rates of sight-threatening retinopathy (44% of these individuals) (p = 0.01) as did 39% of individuals in the highest tertile of glucose levels (p = 0.008).

Conclusion: Those individuals with T1D in the highest tertile of reading-to-reading glucose change showed the greatest change in eGFR. Those with a higher proportion of glucose readings > 18 mmol/L also showed a fall in eGFR and experienced higher rates of sight-threatening retinopathy, as did people with higher mean glucose. Discussions with T1D individuals could reflect on how the percentage recorded glucose above a critical level and degree of change in glucose are important in avoiding future tissue complications.

Introduction: Imeglimin is a first-in-class, novel, oral glucose-lowering agent for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. The efficacy and safety of imeglimin as an antidiabetic agent have been investigated in clinical trials. However, its metabolic effects in humans have not yet been fully elucidated.

Methods: The Study to InveStIgate the Metabolic Action of Imeglimin on patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (SISIMAI) is a single-arm intervention study. In this study, we have recruited 25 patients with type 2 diabetes to receive 2000 mg/day imeglimin for 20 weeks. We perform a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) with double-glucose tracers, a two-step hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp with glucose tracer, ectopic fat measurement by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy, visceral/subcutaneous fat area measurement by magnetic resonance imaging, muscle biopsy, and evaluation of fitness level by cycle ergometer before and after imeglimin administration.

Planned outcomes: The primary outcome is the change in area under the curve of glucose levels during the OGTT after 20 weeks of imeglimin treatment. We also calculate the endogenous glucose production, rate of oral glucose appearance, and rate of glucose disappearance from the data during the 75-g OGTT and compare them between pre- and post-treatment. Additionally, we will compare other parameters, such as the changes in tissue-specific insulin sensitivity, ectopic fat accumulation, visceral/subcutaneous fat area accumulation, and fitness level between each point. This is the first study to investigate the organ-specific metabolic action of imeglimin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus using the 75-g OGTT with the double tracer method. The results of this study are expected to provide useful information for drug selection based on the pathophysiology of individual patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Trial registration: jRCTs031210600.

Peripheral neuropathy (PN) significantly impacts the quality of life, causing substantial morbidity and increased mortality, as well as escalating healthcare costs. While PN can have various causes, the most common form, diabetic peripheral neuropathy, poses considerable risks for potential complications. Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) affects over 50% of people with prediabetes and diabetes. Despite its prevalence, a global gap in diagnosis and management exists, exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. This expert consensus was formulated through a comprehensive evaluation by a panel of experts, informed by a focused literature review, aiming to establish a clinically robust approach to diagnosing and managing pre- and diabetic PN with the early utilization of neurotropic B vitamins. This document offers a consensus perspective on the existing challenges in diagnosing and managing PN, focusing on DPN. The expert panel proposes measures to address this underdiagnosed burden, highlighting the importance of early intervention through innovative screening methods, integrated care approaches, and therapeutic strategies. The document advocates for increased awareness, targeted campaigns, and proactive care strategies to bridge gaps in the patient care of individuals with diabetes, emphasizing the importance of early detection and timely management to improve overall health outcomes. Specific recommendations include incorporating simplified questionnaires and innovative screening methods into routine care, prioritizing neurotropic B vitamin supplementation, optimizing glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist treatments, and adopting a holistic approach to neuropathy management. The consensus underscores the urgent need to address the underdiagnosis and undertreatment of PN, offering practical measures to enhance early detection and improve health outcomes for individuals with DPN.

Introduction: When switching from premixed insulin to insulin degludec/aspart (IDegAsp), IDegAsp usually starts at the same dose as the premixed insulin according to limited clinical experience or at a dose according to clinician discretion. The dose of insulin degludec used in the real world after switching has been poorly investigated.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with type 2 diabetes who switched from premixed insulin to IDegAsp from October 2016 to December 2023. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to compare changes in insulin dose, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting blood glucose (FBG), and postprandial blood glucose (PBG) before and after switching.

Results: Sixty-six patients with prior low-ratio premixed insulin and 22 with prior mid-ratio premixed insulin were included. Among the low-ratio insulin users, the total daily dose of insulin degludec (IDeg) decreased by 21.43% and 19.05% at 3 and 6 months, respectively, after switching, compared with prior basal insulin dose (both p < 0.001). Conversely, among mid-ratio insulin users, the IDeg daily dose increased by 10.71% and 32.14% at 3 and 6 months, respectively, after switching, compared with prior basal insulin dose (both p < 0.001). In all patients, HbA1c levels decreased by 0.70%, FBG decreased by 1.00 mmol/l, and PBG decreased by 1.61 mmol/l after 6 months of switching (all p < 0.05); the total daily insulin dose and injection frequency significantly decreased after switching (both p < 0.05); age and disease duration did not affect IDegAsp effects on HbA1c reduction.

Conclusions: In the setting of transition to IDegAsp from premixed insulin, the dose of basal insulin in the premixed formulation can be a valuable reference for adjusting insulin degludec dose. IDegAsp is superior to premixed insulin in blood glucose control with reduced total daily dose and injection frequency. IDegAsp could be the best choice for the management of diabetes in elderly patients.

Introduction: Previous reviews have demonstrated that dementia and diabetes mellitus, separately, can worsen the hospital outcomes of patients. Unfortunately, there are no systematic evaluations regarding the hospital outcomes of patients with dementia and diabetes mellitus as a comorbidity. Therefore, our review aimed to determine any differences in hospital length of stay, hospital mortality, and hospital readmission between patients with the comorbidity and patients without.

Methods: Searches were conducted of Medline, CINHAL, EMBASE, PsychINFO, Web of Science and Google Scholar for original studies. All studies were quality assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools. Where possible, studies were pooled in a meta-analysis to generate odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results: Sixteen studies were included in this review. When comparing patients with the comorbidity to patients with dementia, the difference in length of stay was inconclusive, and there was no difference in the odds of hospital mortality (OR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.91-1.06). However, patients with the comorbidity had increased odds of 30-day readmission compared to patients with dementia alone (OR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.14-1.26). When comparing patients with the comorbidity to patients with diabetes, those with the comorbidity had a longer length of stay and but no difference in the odds of hospital mortality (OR = 1.48, 95% CI 0.84-2.62). Additionally, those with the comorbidity may have worse readmission outcomes than those with diabetes alone.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that patients with comorbid dementia and diabetes mellitus may have worse hospital outcomes. Therefore, we recommend further research to assess these patients' hospital outcomes to resolve the discrepancies found.

Introduction: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a highly heterogeneous disease with a varying risk of complications. The recent novel subgroup classification using cluster analysis contributed to the risk evaluation of diabetic complications. However, whether the subgroup classification strategy could be adopted to predict the risk of onset and progression of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) in Chinese individuals with T2DM remains to be elucidated.

Methods: In this retrospective study, 612 Chinese patients with T2DM were enrolled, and the median follow-up time was 3.5 years. The T2DM subgroups were categorized by a two-step cluster analysis based on five parameters, including age at onset of diabetes, body mass index (BMI), glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), homeostasis model assessment 2 of insulin resistance (HOMA2-IR), and homeostasis model assessment 2 of β-cell function (HOMA2-β). Clinical characteristics across subgroups were compared using t-tests and chi-square tests. Furthermore, multivariate logistic regression models were adopted to assess the risk of albuminuria progression and renal function decline among different subgroups.

Results: The cohort was categorized into four groups: severe insulin-deficient diabetes (SIDD), with 146 patients (23.9%); mild insulin resistance (MIRD), with 81 patients (13.2%); moderate glycemic control diabetes (MGCD), with 211 patients (34.5%); and moderate weight insulin deficiency diabetes (MWIDD), with 174 patients (28.4%). The MIRD group exhibited an increased risk of progression from non-albuminuria to albuminuria as compared with the MWIDD group, with an adjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of 2.92 (1.06, 8.04). The SIDD group had a higher risk of progression from micro-albuminuria to macro-albuminuria as compared with the MGCD group, with an adjusted OR and 95% CI of 3.39 (1.01, 11.41). There was no significant difference in the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) decline among all groups.

Conclusion: The present study offered the first evidence for risk evaluation of the development of DKD in the novel cluster-based T2DM Chinese subgroups. It suggested that the MIRD subgroup had a higher risk of DKD onset than the MWIDD subgroup. Meanwhile, the SIDD subgroup showed a higher risk of progression of albuminuria than the MGCD subgroup. This novel classification system could be effective in predicting the risk of DKD in Chinese patients with T2DM, which could facilitate the implementation of personalized therapeutic strategies.

Trial registration: This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2300077183).

Introduction: Oral semaglutide is a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) approved for improving glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D). The PIONEER REAL program evaluates clinical and patient-reported outcomes of oral semaglutide treatment as part of routine clinical practice across 13 countries. Here, data from Canada, Denmark, Italy, the Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland, and the UK are pooled and analyzed to address treatment satisfaction as well as glycated hemoglobin (HbA_1C) and body weight changes in relevant subgroup analyses.

Methods: This pooled analysis encompasses seven country-specific, non-interventional, multicenter, phase 4, prospective, single-arm clinical studies assessing the use of oral semaglutide in adults with T2D. Primary endpoint was the change in HbA_1C from baseline to end of study (EOS), and secondary endpoints included changes in body weight and treatment satisfaction. For the analyses, results were stratified by age, T2D duration, and oral semaglutide dose at EOS as well as baseline HbA_1C, body weight, and body mass index.

Results: Oral semaglutide treatment was initiated by 1615 participants. At EOS, 1222 (76%) participants out of the 1483 (92%) who completed the study were on treatment. Estimated changes in HbA_1C and body weight from baseline to week 38 were - 1.0%-point (95% CI - 1.08 to - 0.97; P < 0.0001) and - 5.0% (CI - 5.37 to - 4.72; P < 0.0001). Treatment satisfaction increased significantly during the study. Shorter T2D duration interacted with higher HbA_1C reduction and body weight loss. Interaction was also observed between higher baseline HbA_1C and more pronounced decrease in HbA_1C. No significant interactions were detected between clinical outcomes and age or physician setting.

Conclusion: The PIONEER REAL pooled analysis shows that people initiating oral semaglutide treatment experience improved glycemic control and body weight loss across age groups and T2D duration. This occurs regardless of specialist or primary care practice setting and is accompanied by an increased treatment satisfaction.

Clinical trial registrations: NCT04559815 (Canada), NCT04537637 (Denmark), NCT05230615 (Italy), NCT04601740 (the Netherlands), NCT04601753 (Sweden), NCT04537624 (Switzerland), NCT04862923 (UK).