Diabetes Therapy最新文献

There is a gap of knowledge about the clinical and pathophysiological implications resulting from the interaction between primary hyperlipidemias and type 2 diabetes (T2D). Most of the existing evidence comes from sub-analyses of cohorts; scant information derives from randomized clinical trials. The expected clinical implications of T2D in patients with primary hyperlipidemias is an escalation of their already high cardiovascular risk. There is a need to accurately identify patients with this dual burden and to adequately prescribe lipid-lowering therapies, with the current advancements in newer therapeutic options. This review provides an update on the interactions of primary hyperlipidemias, such as familial combined hyperlipidemia, familial hypercholesterolemia, multifactorial chylomicronemia, lipoprotein (a), and type 2 diabetes.

Introduction: Bariatric surgery (BS) has emerged an effective intervention in achieving significant and sustained weight loss in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, comprehensive data on the long-term impact of BS on hypertension is scarce. We aimed to investigate the long-term impact of BS on blood pressure management in individuals within a T2D cohort.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted on 119 patients who underwent BS between 2009 and 2012. Baseline and follow-up observations, including blood pressure, HbA1c, BMI, and antihypertensive medication use were obtained from electronic patient records at regular intervals up to and beyond 10-year follow-up.

Results: The median follow-up period for the 119 patients was 11.5 years. Mean fall in BMI 4-8 weeks post-surgery was 12%. A sustained reduction in systolic BP was observed up to 10 years post-surgery (154.5 mmHg pre-op vs. 132.8 mmHg at 10 years; p < 0.0001. From 5 years onwards, there were increases in mean glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and body mass index (BMI). At latest follow-up (> 5 years after bariatric surgery), the number of individuals prescribed an antihypertensive agent started to increase. This is in the context of the number of the number of individuals on 2-3 antihypertensive agents declining up until 5 years post-BS. Specifically, there was a reduction in the number of prescriptions of an antihypertensive agent over time from 164 prescriptions pre-operatively to 81 at 8 weeks post-operatively, 78 at 6 months, 72 at 1 year, 66 at 5 years before rising at 10 years to 95 prescriptions.

Conclusions: Our study shows an overall benefit in the years after bariatric surgery in terms of blood pressure and requirement for antihypertensive medication. However, at 5 years and beyond after surgery, the beneficial effect of bariatric surgery diminishes with respect to an increase in number of antihypertensive medication prescriptions, BMI, and HbA1c.

With the increasing global incidence of diabetes mellitus, physicians may encounter more patients with acute and chronic complications of medication-induced hyperglycemia and diabetes. Moreover, medication-induced diabetes may be an important contributing factor to the high rates of diabetes, and recognizing its impact and risk is a critical step in curtailing its effect on the global population. It has long been recognized that multiple classes of medications are associated with hyperglycemia through various mechanisms, and the ability to foresee this and implement adequate management strategies are important. Moreover, different antihyperglycemic medications are better suited to combat the hyperglycemia encountered with different classes of medications, so it is critical that physicians can recognize which agents should be used, and which medications to avoid in certain types of medication-induced hyperglycemia. In this review, we will discuss the evidence behind the main classes of medications that cause hyperglycemia, their mechanism of action, specific agents that are associated with worsened glycemic control, and, most importantly, management strategies that are tailored to each specific class.

Introduction: There is a growing body of evidence demonstrating the benefit of flash glucose monitoring in people living with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This real-world study aimed to evaluate the effect of initiating flash glucose monitoring on change in HbA1c after 3-6 months in adults living with T2DM treated with multiple daily injections of insulin.

Methods: A retrospective observational study using data from ten clinical centres in the UK for adults with T2DM treated with multiple daily injections of insulin for at least 1 year was conducted. Patients who had been using the FreeStyle Libre/Libre 2 Flash Glucose Monitoring System for at least 3 months with baseline HbA1c 64-108 mmol/mol (8.0-12.0%) recorded up to 3 months prior to system use were included. Pregnant patients and those on dialysis were excluded. Patients with an HbA1c value measured 3-6 months after commencing flash glucose monitoring were included in the final analysis for evaluation of change.

Results: In total, 87 patients were included in the final analysis (mean age, 60.0 ± 11.8 years, 60.9% male, mean body mass index (BMI), 31.6 ± 5.4 [mean ± SD]). From a mean baseline HbA1c of 80 ± 11 mmol/mol (9.5% ± 1.0%), HbA1c lowered by 11 ± 14 mmol/mol (1.0% ± 1.3%) at 3-6 months (p < 0.0001). A decrease was observed independent of age, baseline HbA1c, sex, duration of insulin use and BMI subgroups.

Conclusions: Initiation of flash glucose monitoring was associated with a clinically and statistically significant improvement in HbA1c in a real-world setting at 3-6 months.

Introduction: Both glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) improve glycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, it is unknown whether adding CGM to GLP-1 RA therapy further improves A1c. We evaluated changes in A1c levels 6 months after initiation of FreeStyle Libre (FSL) in adults with sub-optimally controlled T2D already on GLP-1 RA therapy.

Methods: This retrospective, observational study used Optum's de-identified Market Clarity Data, a linked electronic health record-claims database to assess changes in A1c after FSL acquisition. Inclusion criteria were T2D diagnosis, ≥ 18 years, baseline A1c ≥ 8%, with the first FSL acquisition between 2018 and 2022. Patients were required to be on GLP-1 RA prior to FSL with at least one GLP-1 RA prescription within 90 days of FSL acquisition. GLP-1 RA initiation was defined as the earliest GLP-1 RA prescription from 2017 onwards. Paired changes in A1c were assessed at 6 months after initial FSL acquisition.

Results: The study cohort included 1454 adults with T2D (age 55 ± 10 years, 52% male, 38% with intensive insulin therapy, median 471 days from GLP-1 RA initiation to FSL, and baseline A1c 9.8 ± 1.5%). After FSL acquisition, patients experienced an A1c decrease of 1.5 ± 1.9% (p < 0.001). Patients with a baseline A1c > 10% had the largest reduction (n = 497, - 2.7 ± 2.2%, p < 0.001). Significant improvements were observed in subgroups based on insulin therapy and GLP-1 RA formulation. Those initiating GLP-1 RA therapy > 24 months before FSL acquisition also showed improvements in A1c (n = 478; - 1.3 ± 1.7%, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: In a large, real-world study of adults with T2D, those on prior GLP-1 RA therapy experienced significant A1c improvements after acquiring FSL, irrespective of GLP-1 RA duration, GLP-1 RA formulation, or insulin therapy type. These findings support the use of FSL in adults with T2D treated with GLP-1 RA.

Introduction: Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) who require intensification of basal insulin therapy need treatment options that can improve their health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and translate into better outcomes. These analyses compared patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with T2D receiving tirzepatide or insulin lispro.

Methods: The randomised, open-label, multinational, phase 3b SURPASS-6 trial (NCT04537923) was conducted at 135 medical research centres and hospitals in 15 countries and compared two recommended treatment intensification strategies in people with T2D and inadequate glycaemic control on basal insulin: addition of once-weekly tirzepatide versus addition of prandial insulin lispro. Randomisation was stratified by country, baseline glycated haemoglobin level and metformin use. PROs were measured using the Short Form-36 Health Survey version 2 (SF-36v2) acute form (secondary outcome), EQ-5D-5L, Ability to Perform Physical Activities of Daily Living (APPADL) questionnaire and Impact of Weight on Self-Perceptions (IW-SP) questionnaire (tertiary/exploratory outcomes). PROs were compared for the tirzepatide-pooled dose group (5, 10 and 15 mg) and each tirzepatide dose group versus insulin lispro at 52 weeks using the modified intention-to-treat efficacy analysis set.

Results: Between 19 October 2020 and 01 November 2022, 2267 people were assessed and 1428 participants with T2D were randomised. At 52 weeks, participants in the tirzepatide-pooled group had statistically significant improved scores across all SF-36v2 domains and both component summary scores compared with insulin lispro-treated participants (p < 0.05), with the largest differences observed in the general health, vitality and mental health domains. Statistically significant improved APPADL and IW-SP total scores, as well as EQ visual analogue scale and EQ-5D-5L index scores (after adjustment for baseline scores), were observed in tirzepatide-pooled participants compared with insulin lispro-treated participants.

Conclusions: In adult patients with T2D and inadequate glycaemic control with basal insulin, tirzepatide treatment was associated with greater improvements in HRQoL than prandial insulin therapy in addition to clinically significant improvements in glycaemic and body weight-related parameters.

Insulin is an essential medication for people with type 1 diabetes mellitus and for some people with type 2 diabetes. Interestingly, insulin abuse has been reported as a mode of suicide, not only among people with diabetes, but also among their relatives, and among medical and paramedical personnel who have access to insulin. The aim of the present commentary was to raise awareness of potential depression-related intentional insulin overdose and its complications, as well as of the diagnosis and treatment of this entity. Insulin overdose may lead to severe and prolonged hypoglycemia, hypoglycemic coma, and death. Moreover, hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, hypophosphatemia, and elevated liver enzymes are common. Insulin overdose should be suspected among people with diabetes in case of unexplained prolonged hypoglycemia and among people without diabetes who exhibit hypoglycemia and may have access to diabetic medications. The ratio of insulin to C-peptide helps distinguish exogenous insulin administration from endogenous secretion. The cornerstone of therapy is prompt administration of concentrated glucose infusions for days with simultaneous oral intake, when possible, and intense glucose monitoring to prevent hypoglycemia. Moreover, monitoring of serum electrolyte levels is recommended. Finally, psychiatric evaluation aiming at early identification of depression and suicidality is of paramount importance.

Introduction: The study was designed to assess outcomes with once-daily oral semaglutide in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) naïve to injectable glucose-lowering agents, in Swedish clinical practice.

Methods: In this non-interventional, multicentre study, participants initiated oral semaglutide and were followed for 34-44 weeks. The primary endpoint was glycated haemoglobin (HbA_1c) change from baseline to end of study (EOS). Secondary endpoints included body weight (BW) change from baseline to EOS, proportion of participants achieving HbA_1c < 7%, and proportion achieving both a HbA_1c reduction ≥ 1% and BW reduction of ≥ 3% or ≥ 5%, at EOS. Participants completed Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaires (DTSQ status/change) and a dosing conditions questionnaire.

Results: A total of 187 participants (mean age 62.5 years) initiated oral semaglutide. Baseline mean HbA_1c and BW were 7.8% (n = 177) and 96.9 kg (n = 165), respectively. Estimated mean changes in HbA_1c and BW were - 0.88%-points (95% confidence interval [CI] - 1.01 to - 0.75; P < 0.0001) and - 4.72% (95% CI - 5.58 to - 3.86; P < 0.0001), respectively. At EOS, 64.6% of participants had HbA_1c < 7%, and 22.9% achieved HbA_1c reduction of ≥ 1% and BW reduction of ≥ 5%. DTSQ status and change scores improved by 1.44 (P = 0.0260) and 12.3 points (P < 0.0001), respectively. Oral semaglutide was easy or very easy to consume for 86.4% of participants. Most common adverse events (AEs) were gastrointestinal disorders; nine participants (4.8%) had serious AEs; one (0.5%) experienced severe hypoglycaemia.

Conclusion: In this real-world study population, we observed significant reductions in HbA_1c and BW in people living with T2D when prescribed semaglutide tablets as part of routine clinical practice in Sweden, with improved treatment satisfaction among participants and no new safety concerns.

Trial registration: NCT04601753.

Introduction: The efficacy and safety of oral semaglutide, the first glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist available in tablet form for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, were established in the phase 3a PIONEER program. However, evidence regarding the titration of oral semaglutide in real-world clinical settings remains insufficient. This study aimed to elucidate the therapeutic advantages of escalating the dose of oral semaglutide from 7 to 14 mg through clinical data analysis.

Methods: This retrospective observational study was conducted at a single center in Japan, focusing on adults with type 2 diabetes who were initiated on 14 mg oral semaglutide. The primary endpoint was the alteration in HbA1c levels 24 weeks after the initial prescription of 14 mg oral semaglutide. Secondary endpoints included changes in metabolic parameters and the incidence of adverse events.

Results: Data from 66 patients who met the inclusion criteria were analyzed. The mean change in HbA1c levels from baseline to 24 weeks following dose escalation was - 0.5 ± 0.8% [from 7.4 ± 1.0% at baseline to 7.0 ± 0.9% at 24 weeks (p < 0.01)]. Moreover, a significant reduction in body weight of - 2.0 ± 4.4 kg was observed at 24 weeks [from 90.0 ± 20.5 kg at baseline to 88.2 ± 21.4 kg at 24 weeks (p < 0.01)], with 41% of patients achieving at least a 3% reduction compared to baseline. Gastrointestinal disorders emerged as the most prevalent adverse event (10.6%), particularly nausea (7.6%), although predominantly of mild or moderate severity, with no instances of serious adverse events necessitating drug discontinuation.

Conclusion: Escalating the dose of oral semaglutide to 14 mg could be an effective approach for enhancing glycemic control and managing body weight in individuals with type 2 diabetes.

The increasing global incidence of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) underscores the urgency of addressing these interconnected health challenges. Obesity enhances genetic and environmental influences on T2D, being not only a primary risk factor but also exacerbating its severity. The complex mechanisms linking obesity and T2D involve adiposity-driven changes in β-cell function, adipose tissue functioning, and multi-organ insulin resistance (IR). Early detection and tailored treatment of T2D and obesity are crucial to mitigate future complications. Moreover, personalized and early intensified therapy considering the presence of comorbidities can delay disease progression and diminish the risk of cardiorenal complications. Employing combination therapies and embracing a disease-modifying strategy are paramount. Clinical trials provide evidence confirming the efficacy and safety of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs). Their use is associated with substantial and durable body weight reduction, exceeding 15%, and improved glucose control which further translate into T2D prevention, possible disease remission, and improvement of cardiometabolic risk factors and associated complications. Therefore, on the basis of clinical experience and current evidence, the Eastern and Southern Europe Diabetes and Obesity Expert Group recommends a personalized, polymodal approach (comprising GLP-1 RAs) tailored to individual patient's disease phenotype to optimize diabetes and obesity therapy. We also expect that the increasing availability of dual GLP-1/glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) agonists will significantly contribute to the modern management of the cardiometabolic continuum.