首页 > 最新文献

Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus最新文献

英文 中文
Magnetic sphincter augmentation as treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease after sleeve gastrectomy. 磁性括约肌增强术治疗袖状胃切除术后的胃食管反流病。
Karan Grover, Leena Khaitan

The sleeve gastrectomy's efficacy for the reduction of excess weight- and obesity-related comorbidities has been consistently demonstrated though the improvement of postoperative reflux symptoms has been questionable. The purpose of this article is to offer a diagnostic and treatment algorithm for patients suffering from GERD after the sleeve gastrectomy. This article is comprised of recommendations of from a single expert bariatric and foregut surgeon. While previously thought to be a relative contraindication, evidence suggests that select patients with a history of sleeve gastrectomy can safely and effectively undergo magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) and achieve improved control of reflux and discontinuation of PPIs. Concomitant hiatal hernia repair with MSA is recommended. MSA is a fantastic strategy for managing GERD after sleeve gastrectomy with careful patient selection.

袖带胃切除术在减少超重和肥胖相关并发症方面的疗效已得到一致证实,但其对术后反流症状的改善效果却备受质疑。本文旨在为袖状胃切除术后的胃食管反流患者提供一种诊断和治疗算法。本文由一位减肥和前肠外科医生专家提出的建议组成。虽然以前认为这是一个相对禁忌症,但有证据表明,有袖状胃切除术史的特定患者可以安全有效地接受磁性括约肌增强术(MSA),并改善对反流的控制和停用 PPIs。建议在进行 MSA 的同时进行食管裂孔疝修补术。在谨慎选择患者的情况下,MSA 是治疗袖状胃切除术后胃食管反流病的绝佳策略。
{"title":"Magnetic sphincter augmentation as treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease after sleeve gastrectomy.","authors":"Karan Grover, Leena Khaitan","doi":"10.1093/dote/doad030","DOIUrl":"10.1093/dote/doad030","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The sleeve gastrectomy's efficacy for the reduction of excess weight- and obesity-related comorbidities has been consistently demonstrated though the improvement of postoperative reflux symptoms has been questionable. The purpose of this article is to offer a diagnostic and treatment algorithm for patients suffering from GERD after the sleeve gastrectomy. This article is comprised of recommendations of from a single expert bariatric and foregut surgeon. While previously thought to be a relative contraindication, evidence suggests that select patients with a history of sleeve gastrectomy can safely and effectively undergo magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) and achieve improved control of reflux and discontinuation of PPIs. Concomitant hiatal hernia repair with MSA is recommended. MSA is a fantastic strategy for managing GERD after sleeve gastrectomy with careful patient selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":11255,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus","volume":"36 Supplement_1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9630734","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Is systematic formal crural repair mandatory at the time of magnetic sphincter augmentation implantation? 磁性括约肌植入时是否必须进行系统的正规足底修复?
Reginald Bell

Laparoscopic placement of the LINX Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation (MSA) device has become an accepted alternative to fundoplication in appropriate patients. Initial studies of MSA targeted to patients with 'early' disease allowed for the most minimal dissection of the esophagus to place the device, without hiatal dissection or repair (NoHHR), in patients with no or minimal hernia findings at surgery. Subsequent studies have compared systematic formal hiatal dissection and repair (Formal HHR) with the original minimal dissection technique. Review of published literature on MSA includes discussion on treatment of hiatal hernia at the time of implantation, accompanying the review of the physiology of the crural diaphragm. Formal hiatal hernia repair at the time of MSA implantation results in better control of reflux with less dysphagia and risk of postoperative hernia than NoHHR, regardless of the presence or size of hiatal hernia. Systematic crural repair should accompany any MSA implantation regardless of the presence or size of hiatal hernia.

腹腔镜下放置LINX磁力括约肌增强(MSA)装置已成为一种可接受的替代方法,在适当的患者。针对“早期”疾病患者的MSA初步研究允许在手术中没有或很少发现疝气的患者中,对食管进行最小的剥离以放置装置,而不需要裂孔剥离或修复(NoHHR)。随后的研究比较了系统的正式裂孔分离和修复(正式HHR)与原始的最小分离技术。回顾已发表的关于MSA的文献,包括在植入时治疗裂孔疝的讨论,以及对脚膈生理学的回顾。在MSA植入时进行正式的裂孔疝修补,与NoHHR相比,可以更好地控制反流,减少吞咽困难和术后疝的风险,无论裂孔疝是否存在或大小如何。无论裂孔疝是否存在或大小,系统的足部修复都应伴随MSA植入。
{"title":"Is systematic formal crural repair mandatory at the time of magnetic sphincter augmentation implantation?","authors":"Reginald Bell","doi":"10.1093/dote/doac108","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doac108","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Laparoscopic placement of the LINX Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation (MSA) device has become an accepted alternative to fundoplication in appropriate patients. Initial studies of MSA targeted to patients with 'early' disease allowed for the most minimal dissection of the esophagus to place the device, without hiatal dissection or repair (NoHHR), in patients with no or minimal hernia findings at surgery. Subsequent studies have compared systematic formal hiatal dissection and repair (Formal HHR) with the original minimal dissection technique. Review of published literature on MSA includes discussion on treatment of hiatal hernia at the time of implantation, accompanying the review of the physiology of the crural diaphragm. Formal hiatal hernia repair at the time of MSA implantation results in better control of reflux with less dysphagia and risk of postoperative hernia than NoHHR, regardless of the presence or size of hiatal hernia. Systematic crural repair should accompany any MSA implantation regardless of the presence or size of hiatal hernia.</p>","PeriodicalId":11255,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus","volume":"36 Supplement_1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9626628","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The role of magnetic sphincter augmentation in the gastroesophageal reflux disease treatment pathway: the gastroenterology perspective. 磁括约肌增强在胃食管反流病治疗途径中的作用:胃肠病学观点。
Amit Patel, C Prakash Gyawali

Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) is a surgical intervention for well-characterized gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), where the esophagogastric junction barrier is augmented using a bracelet of magnetized titanium beads. MSA could be an attractive option for patients with documented GERD who wish to avoid long-term pharmacologic therapy or whose symptoms are not adequately managed with lifestyle modifications and pharmacologic therapy. The 'ideal' MSA patient is one with prominent regurgitation, without dysphagia or esophageal motor dysfunction, with objective evidence of GERD on upper endoscopy and/or ambulatory reflux monitoring. Appropriate candidates with significant hiatus hernia may pursue MSA with concomitant hiatus hernia repair. The increasing adoption of MSA in the GERD treatment pathway reflects research that shows benefits in long-term outcomes and healthcare costs compared with other established therapies in appropriate clinical settings.

磁性括约肌增强术(MSA)是一种治疗特征明确的胃食管反流病(GERD)的手术干预,其中使用磁化钛珠手镯增强食管胃交界屏障。对于希望避免长期药物治疗或生活方式改变和药物治疗不能充分控制症状的有记录的胃食管反流患者,MSA可能是一个有吸引力的选择。“理想”的MSA患者是有明显的反流,没有吞咽困难或食管运动功能障碍,在上胃镜检查和/或动态反流监测中有GERD的客观证据。有明显裂孔疝的合适候选人可以进行MSA合并裂孔疝修补术。在胃食管反流治疗途径中越来越多地采用MSA反映了研究表明,在适当的临床环境中,与其他已建立的治疗方法相比,MSA在长期结果和医疗保健成本方面都有好处。
{"title":"The role of magnetic sphincter augmentation in the gastroesophageal reflux disease treatment pathway: the gastroenterology perspective.","authors":"Amit Patel,&nbsp;C Prakash Gyawali","doi":"10.1093/dote/doad005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doad005","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) is a surgical intervention for well-characterized gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), where the esophagogastric junction barrier is augmented using a bracelet of magnetized titanium beads. MSA could be an attractive option for patients with documented GERD who wish to avoid long-term pharmacologic therapy or whose symptoms are not adequately managed with lifestyle modifications and pharmacologic therapy. The 'ideal' MSA patient is one with prominent regurgitation, without dysphagia or esophageal motor dysfunction, with objective evidence of GERD on upper endoscopy and/or ambulatory reflux monitoring. Appropriate candidates with significant hiatus hernia may pursue MSA with concomitant hiatus hernia repair. The increasing adoption of MSA in the GERD treatment pathway reflects research that shows benefits in long-term outcomes and healthcare costs compared with other established therapies in appropriate clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":11255,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus","volume":"36 Supplement_1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10267695/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10008420","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Long-term clinical and functional results of magnetic sphincter augmentation. 磁性括约肌增强术的长期临床和功能效果。
Inanc S Sarici, Colin P Dunn, Sven E Eriksson, Blair A Jobe, Shahin Ayazi

Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) was introduced in 2007 as an alternative surgical procedure for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The majority of data since MSA's introduction has focused on short and intermediate-term results, demonstrating safety and high efficacy in terms of reflux symptom control, freedom from proton pump inhibitor use and normalization of distal esophageal acid exposure. However, GERD is a chronic condition that demands a long-term solution. Limited available data from studies reporting outcomes at 5 years or later following MSA demonstrate that the promising short- and mid-term efficacy and safety profile of MSA remains relatively constant in the long term. Compared with Nissen fundoplication, MSA has a much lower rate of gas-bloat and inability to belch at a short-term follow-up, a difference that persists in the long-term. The most common complaint after MSA at a short-term follow-up is dysphagia. However, limited data suggest dysphagia rates largely decrease by 5 years. Dysphagia is the most common indication for dilation and device removal in both early- and long-term studies. However, the overall rates of dilation and removal are similar in short- and long-term reports, suggesting the majority of these procedures are performed in the short-term period after device implantation. The indications and standard practices of MSA have evolved over time. Long-term outcome data currently available are all from patient cohorts who were selected for MSA under early restricted indications and outdated regimens. Therefore, further long-term studies are needed to corroborate the preliminary, yet encouraging long-term results.

磁括约肌增强术(MSA)于2007年引入,作为胃食管反流病(GERD)患者的替代外科手术。自MSA引入以来,大多数数据集中在短期和中期结果上,在反流症状控制、不使用质子泵抑制剂和食管远端酸暴露正常化方面证明了安全性和有效性。然而,胃食管反流是一种需要长期解决的慢性疾病。从报告MSA后5年或更晚的结果的研究中获得的有限数据表明,MSA有希望的短期和中期疗效和安全性在长期内保持相对稳定。与尼森手术相比,MSA在短期随访中有更低的气胀率和不能打嗝,这一差异长期存在。在短期随访中,MSA术后最常见的主诉是吞咽困难。然而,有限的数据表明,吞咽困难的发生率在5年内大幅下降。吞咽困难是早期和长期研究中最常见的扩张和器械移除适应症。然而,在短期和长期报告中,扩张和移除的总体比率相似,这表明大多数这些手术是在植入装置后的短期内进行的。MSA的适应症和标准做法随着时间的推移而发展。目前可获得的长期结果数据均来自早期限制性指征和过时方案下选择MSA的患者队列。因此,需要进一步的长期研究来证实初步但令人鼓舞的长期结果。
{"title":"Long-term clinical and functional results of magnetic sphincter augmentation.","authors":"Inanc S Sarici,&nbsp;Colin P Dunn,&nbsp;Sven E Eriksson,&nbsp;Blair A Jobe,&nbsp;Shahin Ayazi","doi":"10.1093/dote/doac109","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doac109","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) was introduced in 2007 as an alternative surgical procedure for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The majority of data since MSA's introduction has focused on short and intermediate-term results, demonstrating safety and high efficacy in terms of reflux symptom control, freedom from proton pump inhibitor use and normalization of distal esophageal acid exposure. However, GERD is a chronic condition that demands a long-term solution. Limited available data from studies reporting outcomes at 5 years or later following MSA demonstrate that the promising short- and mid-term efficacy and safety profile of MSA remains relatively constant in the long term. Compared with Nissen fundoplication, MSA has a much lower rate of gas-bloat and inability to belch at a short-term follow-up, a difference that persists in the long-term. The most common complaint after MSA at a short-term follow-up is dysphagia. However, limited data suggest dysphagia rates largely decrease by 5 years. Dysphagia is the most common indication for dilation and device removal in both early- and long-term studies. However, the overall rates of dilation and removal are similar in short- and long-term reports, suggesting the majority of these procedures are performed in the short-term period after device implantation. The indications and standard practices of MSA have evolved over time. Long-term outcome data currently available are all from patient cohorts who were selected for MSA under early restricted indications and outdated regimens. Therefore, further long-term studies are needed to corroborate the preliminary, yet encouraging long-term results.</p>","PeriodicalId":11255,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus","volume":"36 Supplement_1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9991361","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reoperative surgery after magnetic sphincter augmentation. 磁力括约肌增强术后再手术。
Ashwini S Poola, Prakash Gatta

Reoperative surgery following magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) is rare. The clinical indications include the removal of MSA for dysphagia, the recurrence of reflux, or the issues of erosion. Diagnostic evaluation follows that of patients with recurrent reflux and dysphagia following surgical fundoplication. Procedures following the complications of MSA can be performed in a minimally invasive fashion, either endoscopically or robotic/laparoscopically, with good clinical outcomes.

磁括约肌增强术(MSA)后再手术是罕见的。临床适应症包括因吞咽困难、返流复发或糜烂问题而切除MSA。诊断评价是对手术后复发性反流和吞咽困难患者的评价。MSA并发症后的手术可以采用微创方式进行,无论是内窥镜还是机器人/腹腔镜,临床效果都很好。
{"title":"Reoperative surgery after magnetic sphincter augmentation.","authors":"Ashwini S Poola,&nbsp;Prakash Gatta","doi":"10.1093/dote/doad024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doad024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reoperative surgery following magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) is rare. The clinical indications include the removal of MSA for dysphagia, the recurrence of reflux, or the issues of erosion. Diagnostic evaluation follows that of patients with recurrent reflux and dysphagia following surgical fundoplication. Procedures following the complications of MSA can be performed in a minimally invasive fashion, either endoscopically or robotic/laparoscopically, with good clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11255,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus","volume":"36 Supplement_1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9637109","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Magnetic sphincter augmentation: considerations for use in Barrett's esophagus. 磁性括约肌增强术:用于巴雷特食管的注意事项。
Audra J Reiter, Domenico A Farina, Jeffrey S Fronza, Srinadh Komanduri

Barrett's esophagus (BE) occurs in 5-15% of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). While acid suppressive therapy is a critical component of BE management to minimize the risk of progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma, surgical control of mechanical reflux is sometimes necessary. Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) is an increasingly utilized anti-reflux surgical therapy for GERD. While the use of MSA is listed as a precaution by the United States Food and Drug Administration, there are limited data showing effective BE regression with MSA. MSA offers several advantages in BE including effective reflux control, anti-reflux barrier restoration and reduced hiatal hernia recurrence. However, careful patient selection for MSA is necessary.

在患有胃食管反流病(GERD)的患者中,5%-15% 会出现巴雷特食管(BE)。虽然抑酸治疗是治疗巴雷特食管炎的重要组成部分,可以最大限度地降低发展为食管腺癌的风险,但有时也需要通过手术控制机械性反流。磁性括约肌增强术(MSA)是治疗胃食管反流病的一种越来越常用的抗反流手术疗法。虽然美国食品和药物管理局已将使用 MSA 列为预防措施,但有有限的数据显示,使用 MSA 能有效缓解 BE。MSA 在治疗 BE 方面具有多种优势,包括有效控制反流、恢复抗反流屏障和减少裂孔疝复发。然而,有必要谨慎选择接受 MSA 治疗的患者。
{"title":"Magnetic sphincter augmentation: considerations for use in Barrett's esophagus.","authors":"Audra J Reiter, Domenico A Farina, Jeffrey S Fronza, Srinadh Komanduri","doi":"10.1093/dote/doac096","DOIUrl":"10.1093/dote/doac096","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Barrett's esophagus (BE) occurs in 5-15% of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). While acid suppressive therapy is a critical component of BE management to minimize the risk of progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma, surgical control of mechanical reflux is sometimes necessary. Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) is an increasingly utilized anti-reflux surgical therapy for GERD. While the use of MSA is listed as a precaution by the United States Food and Drug Administration, there are limited data showing effective BE regression with MSA. MSA offers several advantages in BE including effective reflux control, anti-reflux barrier restoration and reduced hiatal hernia recurrence. However, careful patient selection for MSA is necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":11255,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus","volume":"36 Supplement_1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10267686/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9638791","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Magnetic sphincter augmentation: paradigm change or just another device in the surgeon's toolbox? 磁性括约肌增强术:范式改变还是外科医生工具箱中的另一种设备?
Tom R DeMeester

The common denominator for virtually all episodes of gastroesophageal reflux in health and disease is the loss of the barrier that confines the distal esophagus to the stomach. Factors important in maintaining the function of the barrier are its pressure, length and position. In early reflux disease, overeating, gastric distention and delayed gastric emptying led to a transient loss of the barrier. A permanent loss of the barrier occurs from inflammatory injury to the muscle allowing free flow of gastric juice into the esophageal body. Corrective therapy requires augmentation or restoration of the barrier referred to more commonly as the lower esophageal sphincter.

在健康和疾病中,几乎所有胃食管反流发作的共同点都是限制食管远端与胃之间屏障的丧失。维持屏障功能的重要因素是它的压力、长度和位置。在早期反流疾病中,暴饮暴食、胃膨胀和胃排空延迟导致胃屏障的短暂丧失。由于肌肉受到炎症性损伤,使得胃液可以自由地流入食管体,从而导致屏障的永久性丧失。矫正治疗需要增强或修复屏障,通常称为食管下括约肌。
{"title":"Magnetic sphincter augmentation: paradigm change or just another device in the surgeon's toolbox?","authors":"Tom R DeMeester","doi":"10.1093/dote/doad026","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doad026","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The common denominator for virtually all episodes of gastroesophageal reflux in health and disease is the loss of the barrier that confines the distal esophagus to the stomach. Factors important in maintaining the function of the barrier are its pressure, length and position. In early reflux disease, overeating, gastric distention and delayed gastric emptying led to a transient loss of the barrier. A permanent loss of the barrier occurs from inflammatory injury to the muscle allowing free flow of gastric juice into the esophageal body. Corrective therapy requires augmentation or restoration of the barrier referred to more commonly as the lower esophageal sphincter.</p>","PeriodicalId":11255,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus","volume":"36 Supplement_1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9637108","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Criteria of patient selection for magnetic sphincter augmentation. 磁力括约肌增强术患者选择标准。
E Furay, S Doggett, F P Buckley Iii

This article is an expert review of published literature with the goal of defining the ideal patient selection for Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation (MSA) in Anti-reflux Surgery (ARS). The authors performed a literature search of outcomes after MSA for different patient populations. Although MSA utilization has expanded to include patients with advanced gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), obese patients, and patients with a history of bariatric surgery there is still a paucity of data to support its definitive use in these cohorts. We concluded that younger patients with mild/moderate GERD as evidenced by objective studies in conjunction with normal motility on manometry have the most favorable outcomes after MSA. MSA should be avoided in patients with allergies to nickel, titanium, stainless steel, or ferrous materials. As the utilization of MSA in ARS continues to expand and as more robust data emerges the ideal patient for this device will likely expand as well.

本文是对已发表文献的专家综述,目的是确定抗反流手术(ARS)中磁力括约肌增强术(MSA)的理想患者选择。作者对不同患者群体的MSA后的结果进行了文献检索。尽管MSA的应用范围已扩大到晚期胃食管反流病(GERD)患者、肥胖患者和有减肥手术史的患者,但仍缺乏数据支持其在这些人群中的明确应用。我们的结论是,客观研究表明,年轻的轻度/中度胃食管反流患者在接受MSA治疗后,血压运动正常,结果最有利。对镍、钛、不锈钢或铁材料过敏的患者应避免使用MSA。随着MSA在ARS中的应用不断扩大,以及更多可靠数据的出现,这种设备的理想患者也可能会增加。
{"title":"Criteria of patient selection for magnetic sphincter augmentation.","authors":"E Furay,&nbsp;S Doggett,&nbsp;F P Buckley Iii","doi":"10.1093/dote/doac115","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doac115","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article is an expert review of published literature with the goal of defining the ideal patient selection for Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation (MSA) in Anti-reflux Surgery (ARS). The authors performed a literature search of outcomes after MSA for different patient populations. Although MSA utilization has expanded to include patients with advanced gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), obese patients, and patients with a history of bariatric surgery there is still a paucity of data to support its definitive use in these cohorts. We concluded that younger patients with mild/moderate GERD as evidenced by objective studies in conjunction with normal motility on manometry have the most favorable outcomes after MSA. MSA should be avoided in patients with allergies to nickel, titanium, stainless steel, or ferrous materials. As the utilization of MSA in ARS continues to expand and as more robust data emerges the ideal patient for this device will likely expand as well.</p>","PeriodicalId":11255,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus","volume":"36 Supplement_1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9639287","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Is magnetic sphincter augmentation indicated in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux? 磁性括约肌增强术是否适用于咽喉反流患者?
Sebastian F Schoppmann

Up to 30% of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) suffer from laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) with symptoms, as chronic cough, laryngitis, or asthma. Besides life-style modifications and medical acid suppression, laparoscopic fundoplication is an established treatment option. Treatment-related side effects after laparoscopic fundoplication have to be weighted against LPR symptom control in 30-85% of patients after surgery. Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) is described as an effective alternative to fundoplication for surgical treatment of GERD. However, evidence on the efficacy of MSA in patients with LPR is very limited. Preliminary data on the results of MSA treating LPR symptoms in patients with acid and weakly acid reflux are promising; showing comparable results to laparoscopic fundoplication by providing the potential of decrease side effects.

高达30%的胃食管反流病(GERD)患者患有喉部反流(LPR),其症状为慢性咳嗽、喉炎或哮喘。除了生活方式的改变和药物抑酸,腹腔镜下翻底术是一种成熟的治疗选择。在30-85%的术后患者中,腹腔镜手术后与治疗相关的副作用必须与LPR症状控制相权衡。磁括约肌增强术(MSA)被认为是手术治疗胃食管反流的有效替代方法。然而,关于MSA在LPR患者中的疗效的证据非常有限。MSA治疗胃酸和弱酸反流患者LPR症状的初步结果是有希望的;通过提供减少副作用的潜力,显示出与腹腔镜下盆底切除术相当的结果。
{"title":"Is magnetic sphincter augmentation indicated in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux?","authors":"Sebastian F Schoppmann","doi":"10.1093/dote/doad012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doad012","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Up to 30% of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) suffer from laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) with symptoms, as chronic cough, laryngitis, or asthma. Besides life-style modifications and medical acid suppression, laparoscopic fundoplication is an established treatment option. Treatment-related side effects after laparoscopic fundoplication have to be weighted against LPR symptom control in 30-85% of patients after surgery. Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) is described as an effective alternative to fundoplication for surgical treatment of GERD. However, evidence on the efficacy of MSA in patients with LPR is very limited. Preliminary data on the results of MSA treating LPR symptoms in patients with acid and weakly acid reflux are promising; showing comparable results to laparoscopic fundoplication by providing the potential of decrease side effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":11255,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus","volume":"36 Supplement_1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9630736","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Comparative outcomes of Toupet fundoplication and magnetic sphincter augmentation. 托佩扩底术与磁力括约肌增强术的比较结果。
Emanuele Asti, Pamela Milito, Caterina Froiio, Valentina Milani, Luigi Bonavina

Laparoscopic fundoplication is the current surgical gold standard for the treatment of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) is a less invasive, standardized, and reversible option to restore competency of the lower esophageal sphincter. A comparative cohort study was conducted at a tertiary-care referral center on patients with typical GERD symptoms treated with systematic crural repair combined with Toupet fundoplication or MSA. Primary study outcome was decrease of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) score. Between January 2014 and December 2021, a total of 199 patients (60.3% female, median [Q1-Q3] age: 51.0 [40.0-61.0]) underwent MSA (n = 130) or Toupet fundoplication (n = 69). Operative time and hospital stay were significantly shorter in MSA patients (P < 0.0001). At a median follow-up of 12.0 [12.0-24.0] months, there was a statistically significant decrease of GERD-HRQL score in both patient groups (P = 0.001). The mean delta values did not significantly differ between groups (P = 0.7373). The incidence of severe gas bloating symptoms was similar in the two groups (P = 0.7604), but the rate of persistent postoperative dysphagia was greater in MSA patients (P = 0.0009). Six (8.7%) patients in the Toupet group had recurrent hiatal hernia requiring revisional surgery in one (1.4%). In the MSA group, eight (7.9%) patients necessitated through-the-scope balloon dilation for relief of dysphagia, and six patients had the device removed (4.6%) because of persistent dysphagia (n = 3), device disconnection (n = 1), persistent reflux (n = 1) or need of magnetic resonance (n = 1). Toupet and MSA procedures provide similar clinical outcomes, but MSA is associated with a greater risk of reoperation. Randomized clinical trials comparing fundoplication and MSA are eagerly awaited.

腹腔镜下胃底复制术是目前治疗难治性胃食管反流病(GERD)的手术金标准。磁括约肌增强术(MSA)是一种微创、标准化、可逆的食管下括约肌功能恢复方法。在一家三级保健转诊中心,对有典型胃食管反流症状的患者进行了一项比较队列研究,患者接受了系统性脚部修复联合Toupet底复制或MSA治疗。主要研究结果为胃食管反流疾病-健康相关生活质量(GERD-HRQL)评分的降低。2014年1月至2021年12月,共有199例患者(60.3%为女性,中位[Q1-Q3]年龄:51.0[40.0-61.0])接受了MSA (n = 130)或Toupet(69)手术。MSA患者的手术时间和住院时间均明显缩短(P
{"title":"Comparative outcomes of Toupet fundoplication and magnetic sphincter augmentation.","authors":"Emanuele Asti,&nbsp;Pamela Milito,&nbsp;Caterina Froiio,&nbsp;Valentina Milani,&nbsp;Luigi Bonavina","doi":"10.1093/dote/doac090","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doac090","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Laparoscopic fundoplication is the current surgical gold standard for the treatment of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) is a less invasive, standardized, and reversible option to restore competency of the lower esophageal sphincter. A comparative cohort study was conducted at a tertiary-care referral center on patients with typical GERD symptoms treated with systematic crural repair combined with Toupet fundoplication or MSA. Primary study outcome was decrease of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) score. Between January 2014 and December 2021, a total of 199 patients (60.3% female, median [Q1-Q3] age: 51.0 [40.0-61.0]) underwent MSA (n = 130) or Toupet fundoplication (n = 69). Operative time and hospital stay were significantly shorter in MSA patients (P < 0.0001). At a median follow-up of 12.0 [12.0-24.0] months, there was a statistically significant decrease of GERD-HRQL score in both patient groups (P = 0.001). The mean delta values did not significantly differ between groups (P = 0.7373). The incidence of severe gas bloating symptoms was similar in the two groups (P = 0.7604), but the rate of persistent postoperative dysphagia was greater in MSA patients (P = 0.0009). Six (8.7%) patients in the Toupet group had recurrent hiatal hernia requiring revisional surgery in one (1.4%). In the MSA group, eight (7.9%) patients necessitated through-the-scope balloon dilation for relief of dysphagia, and six patients had the device removed (4.6%) because of persistent dysphagia (n = 3), device disconnection (n = 1), persistent reflux (n = 1) or need of magnetic resonance (n = 1). Toupet and MSA procedures provide similar clinical outcomes, but MSA is associated with a greater risk of reoperation. Randomized clinical trials comparing fundoplication and MSA are eagerly awaited.</p>","PeriodicalId":11255,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus","volume":"36 Supplement_1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9634909","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
期刊
Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1