Drugs - Real World Outcomes最新文献

Background: Studies on medicinal cannabis (MC) have primarily investigated effects on diseases and symptoms, while there is only sparse knowledge on patients' health-related quality of life. Our aim was, firstly, to compare the health-related quality of life of patients (MC users and non-users) within four specified diagnostic indications (multiple sclerosis, paraplegia, neuropathy, and nausea and vomiting after chemotherapy) with that of patients with other diagnostic indications (MC users only) and the adult population (non-users only). Secondly, we estimate the associations between use of MC and health-related quality of life for patients in the four specified diagnostic indications.

Methods: We collected data on quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), using EQ-5D-3L, and patients' self-reported use of MC in a Danish nationwide online survey distributed to 23,846 patients in October 2020. We compared QALY scores of all groups using a two-tailed t-test, listed QALY scores of MC users versus non-users, and investigated associations between QALY score and MC use using unadjusted and adjusted linear regression analyses. Significance level was set to p-value < 0.05.

Results: A total of 9265 patients took part in the survey. All diagnostic indications had a statistically significant lower QALY score than the adult population (0.87). Paraplegia patients had the lowest QALY score, being 0.36 lower, followed by other diagnostic indication (- 0.34), multiple sclerosis (- 0.20), neuropathy (- 0.13), and nausea and vomiting after chemotherapy (- 0.06). MC users had a statistically significant lower QALY score than non-users (0.44 vs 0.74). Users redeeming 1-6 and ≥ 7 MC prescriptions (except for paraplegia patients) had a statistically significant lower QALY score than non-users, ranging between 0.11-0.24 and 0.26-0.32 lower than non-users, accordingly. Although, it should be noted that the number of users was small when stratifying by number of prescriptions.

Conclusion: Patients with either multiple sclerosis, paraplegia, neuropathy, or nausea and vomiting after chemotherapy had a significantly lower health-related quality of life than individuals from the adult population. Users of medicinal cannabis also had a significantly lower health-related quality of life compared with non-users, in all diagnostic indications.

Background and objective: The terminal complement inhibitor eculizumab is approved in the USA for the treatment of patients with acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis (MG). The ELEVATE study aimed to examine clinical-practice outcome data on eculizumab effectiveness in US adults with MG (generalized or ocular). This paper reports the findings on MG exacerbations and crises and associated healthcare resource utilization, and the use of rescue therapy.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted of US adults with MG who initiated eculizumab. Outcomes assessed for up to 2 years before and after eculizumab initiation included percentages and rates per patient per year (PPPY) of exacerbations and crises (the latter defined as intubation/impending intubation), healthcare resource utilization, and rescue therapy administration.

Results: A total of 119 patients diagnosed with MG were enrolled in the study; 92 patients had ≥ 3 months of data both before and during eculizumab therapy and were included in the analyses. The mean rate of MG exacerbations decreased from 0.385 PPPY before eculizumab initiation to 0.152 PPPY during eculizumab treatment (p = 0.0034); the mean rate of MG crises decreased from 0.411 to 0.056 PPPY (p = 0.0018). Rates of healthcare resource utilization and rescue therapy use also decreased significantly during eculizumab treatment.

Conclusions: This retrospective chart review analysis provides evidence for a beneficial impact of eculizumab treatment on the incidence of MG exacerbations and crises and associated healthcare resource utilization in clinical practice, and on rescue therapy use. These data further support the therapeutic benefits of eculizumab in patients with MG.

Background and objective: Accurate and robust adverse event (AE) data collection is crucial in cancer clinical trials to ensure participant safety. Frameworks have been developed to facilitate the collection of AE data and now the traditional workflows are facing renewal to include patient-reported data, improving completeness of AE data. We explored one of these workflows in a cancer clinical trial unit.

Methods: The study was a single-site study conducted at a tertiary hospital located in Australia. Patients consenting to a clinical trial were eligible for inclusion in this study. Participants used an electronic platform-My Health My Way (MHMW)-to report their symptomatic data weekly for 24 weeks. A symptom list was included within the platform, along with a free text field. Data reported via the platform was compared with data recorded in the patient's medical chart. Time taken to compile data from each source was recorded, along with missing data points. Agreement between patient-reported data and data recorded in the medical notes was assessed using Kappa and Gwet's AC₁; time taken to compile data and missing data points were assessed using a Wilcoxon signed rank test.

Results: Low agreement was found between patient- and clinician-reported data (- 0.482 and - 0.159 by Kappa and Gwet's AC₁ respectively). Only 127 (30%) of the total 428 AEs were reported by both MHMW and medical notes. Patients reported higher rates of symptoms from the symptom list, while clinicians reported higher rates of symptoms outside of the symptom list. Time taken to compile the data from MHMW was significantly less than that taken to review medical notes (2.19 min versus 5.73 min respectively; P <  0.001). There were significantly less missing data points from the MHMW data compared with the medical notes (1.4 versus 7.8; P < 0.001).

Conclusions: This study confirms previous reports that patient- and clinician-reported adverse event data show low agreement. This study also shows that clinical trial sites could significantly reduce the work performed by research staff in the collection of adverse event data by implementing an electronic, patient-reported platform.

Introduction: The association between omeprazole and hypertension is poorly documented. The summary of product characteristics of omeprazole approved by major regulators did not mention hypertension as an adverse drug event. Triggered by a locally reported case, this study was conducted to assess the possible causal relationship between omeprazole and hypertension.

Methods: Globally reported cases of hypertension following use of omeprazole submitted to the World Health Organization global database, VigiBase, were retrieved on 5 March 2024 and analyzed descriptively. Besides this, a literature search was made to identify preclinical, clinical, and epidemiological information on the association between omeprazole and hypertension or increased blood pressure using different data sources. Relevant information, gathered from different data sources, was finally systematically organized into an Austin Bradford-Hill causality assessment framework to assess the causal relationship between omeprazole and hypertension.

Results: VigiBase indicated a total of 1043 cases of hypertension related to omeprazole from 36 different countries. In the global database, a statistical signal was triggered (IC₀₂₅: 0.12) on association of omeprazole and hypertension. From the 1043 cases, 65.0% and 10.6% were reported as 'serious' and 'fatal', respectively. Hypertension resolved following withdrawal of omeprazole in 85 cases and recurred after re-introduction of the suspect drug in 14 cases. In 225 cases, omeprazole was the only suspected drug, while in 122 cases, omeprazole was the sole drug administered. When only these 122 cases were considered, 29 cases had positive dechallenge, four cases were with positive rechallenge and the median time-to-onset was 2 days. Literature search identified a possible biological mechanism and some experimental evidence that indicates omeprazole could possibly cause hypertension.

Conclusion: Currently available totality of evidence suggests there is a possible causal relationship between omeprazole and hypertension. Hence, it is recommended to monitor and report any incidence of hypertension related to omeprazole, and further epidemiological studies are recommended to corroborate the suggested causal association.

Introduction: The costs associated with proper disposal, management, and regulatory compliance of controlled substances in healthcare systems are substantial. In the context of the current opioid crisis, and given the high abuse potential of controlled substances, it is imperative that waste is minimized and waste procedures are followed to ensure safe disposal of controlled substances. This study aims to quantify the costs associated with fentanyl, hydromorphone, morphine, midazolam, and ketamine waste in intraoperative areas through a multi-site observational analysis.

Methods: The study used an observational design across various hospital procedural and post-procedural units in the Southwest Florida region of the United States. Automated and non-automated workflows for wasting controlled substances were compared. As with a previous study conducted by Hertig et al., waste was evaluated as (1) the quantity (mg/μg) of medication disposed defined as 'pharmaceutical waste' or 'product waste' (PW); and (2) workforce time associated with the waste disposal process defined as 'workforce time waste' (WTW). Secondary measures include workforce costs associated with the waste disposal process. The product waste analysis was conducted between October and December 2023. The workforce time waste analysis was examined over a 10-day period in January and February 2024. A yearly extrapolation model was applied to cost data.

Results: The findings revealed substantial costs linked to both PW and WTW, emphasizing the financial burden of controlled substance waste. Study data validated previous literature describing the extent of fentanyl, hydromorphone, and morphine waste while documenting significant amounts of midazolam and ketamine waste. The combined annual waste cost for the two study hospitals was estimated at US$56,557, with workforce time accounting for 36%-50% of this total cost.

Conclusion: This study provides vital insights into the financial and operational impact of medication waste in procedural and post-procedural areas, supporting ongoing efforts to minimize waste, ensuring the safe and effective use of controlled substances. Future research should explore the impact of medication waste across diverse healthcare settings and the cost implications associated with pharmacy professionals in the waste compliance process.

Background: There is a growing interest in products featuring hemp extracts and a demand for more data regarding their safety. To date, there is a paucity of published data on the safety of these products.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of postmarketing surveillance data collected in the United States on full spectrum hemp extract (FSHE) products manufactured by Charlotte's Web (CW) was conducted over an 18-month period (January 2019 to July 2020). The frequency of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) was assessed by analyzing AE reports against the estimated number of consumers who purchased products and the total number of products sold.

Results: During the 18-month period, approximately 646,391 consumers purchased 1,939,172 products and 431 AEs were reported by 304 individuals. The estimated percentage of consumers who reported at least one adverse event was 0.05%. The percentage of AEs per products sold was 0.02%. Most AEs (98.14%) reported were Grade 1 (i.e., asymptomatic or causing mild symptoms), as classified by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Seven AEs were classified as serious, and the percentage of SAEs per products sold was 0.0004%. None of the reported SAEs were classified as a Grade 4 or Grade 5 (i.e., life threatening or fatal).

Conclusions: Approximately 0.05% of consumers who purchased the CW FSHE products from January 2019 to July 2020 reported an adverse event. The percentage of AEs and SAEs per products sold was 0.02% and 0.0004%, respectively. These data demonstrate that CW FSHE products appear to be well tolerated at recommended doses.

Background: Some aspects regarding the use of antiplatelet agents after coil embolization for subarachnoid hemorrhage during admission remain unclear. This study used diagnostic procedure combination (DPC) data to investigate the safety and prognostic effects of aspirin monotherapy and aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitor combination therapy on bleeding events.

Methods: This cross-sectional study used Japanese DPC data to assess patients who were hospitalized with subarachnoid hemorrhage and received aspirin monotherapy and aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitor combination therapy between April 2016 and March 2020 (n = 4421). The aspirin monotherapy (A group, n = 2848) and aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitor combination therapy (AP group, n = 1573) groups were compared. The primary and secondary endpoints were the incidence of bleeding events and proportion of patients with a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≤ 2 at discharge, respectively. Data was analyzed using multivariable adjusted logistic regression (significance level, 5%).

Results: The adjusted odds ratio in AP group, with A group as the reference, for bleeding events and the proportion of patients with mRS score ≤ 2 at discharge were 0.97 (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.75-1.26, p = 0.839) and 1.09 (95% CI: 0.92-1.29, p = 0.302), respectively.

Conclusions: There are no differences in the incidence of bleeding events or good clinical outcomes (mRS score ≤ 2 at discharge) between aspirin monotherapy and aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitor combination therapy.

Introduction: Psychotropic drugs have been reported to cause urinary retention (UR) via anticholinergic and other mechanisms. However, UR has not received much attention because of its non-fatal symptoms. We investigated the occurrence of UR associated with psychotropic drugs using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database.

Methods: Using the JADER database, we calculated reporting odds ratios for UR for 74 psychotropic drugs. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to adjust for the effects of sex, underlying disease, and age on UR. Variable selection included forced entry for sex, age, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), depression, and backward-forward stepwise selection for each drug.

Results: A total of 887,704 cases were reported, of which 4653 (0.52%) had UR. In terms of sex, 0.79% (3401/429,372 cases) and 0.43% (1797/415,358 cases) of male and female patients had UR. In terms of age, 0.31% (892/288,676 cases) and 0.68% (3463/506,907 cases) of patients aged < 60 years and 60 years or older had UR. Among the underlying diseases, 8.22% (930/11,316 cases) and 0.43% (3723/876,388 cases) of patients with BPH and without BPH had UR, respectively. Further, 1.99% (337/16,959 cases) and 0.50% (4316/870,745 cases) of patients with depression and without depression had UR, respectively. Overall, 38 psychotropic drugs met the criteria for signal detection. In logistic regression, a total of 783,083 patients of discernible age and sex were included. The selected variables were sex, age, BPH, depression, and 23 drugs, including quetiapine [adjusted reporting odds ratio (ROR) 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.46-2.81], chlorpromazine (adjusted ROR 95%CI: 1.29-3.13), etizolam (adjusted ROR 95%CI: 1.47-3.09), maprotiline (adjusted ROR 95%CI: 1.99-8.34), mirtazapine (adjusted ROR 95%CI: 1.37-2.88), and duloxetine (adjusted ROR 95%CI: 2.15-4.21).

Conclusions: Many psychotropic drugs induce UR, which may be owing to their pharmacological effects. Appropriate monitoring is needed, especially in patients with other risk factors for UR.