首页 > 最新文献

Diseases of the Colon & Rectum最新文献

英文 中文
Being Remembered. 被铭记
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-12 DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003560
James M Church
{"title":"Being Remembered.","authors":"James M Church","doi":"10.1097/DCR.0000000000003560","DOIUrl":"10.1097/DCR.0000000000003560","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11299,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","volume":" ","pages":"128-130"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142616338","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Final Results of the GRECCAR-6 Trial on Waiting Period Following Neoadjuvant Radiochemotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: 5 Years of Follow-up. 关于局部晚期直肠癌新辅助放化疗后等待期的 GRECCAR-6 试验的最终结果:5 年随访。
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-07 DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003477
Maxime K Collard, Laurent Mineur, Célia Nekrouf, Quentin Denost, Philippe Rouanet, Cécile de Chaisemartin, Aude Merdrignac, Mehrdad Jafari, Eddy Cotte, Jérôme Desrame, Gilles Manceau, Stéphane Benoist, Etienne Buscail, Mehdi Karoui, Yves Panis, Guillaume Piessen, Alain Saudemont, Michel Prudhomme, Frédérique Peschaud, Anne Dubois, Jérôme Loriau, Jean-Jacques Tuech, Emilie Duchalais, Renato M Lupinacci, Nicolas Goasguen, Tabassome Simon, Yann Parc, Jérémie H Lefevre
<p><strong>Background: </strong>The potential oncological benefit of extending the waiting period between neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and surgical resection for rectal cancer is debated.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of prolonging this waiting period on the 5-year oncological prognosis and 2-year functional result of locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Phase III, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Settings: </strong>Patients were enrolled from 24 colorectal centers.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients with nonmetastatic mid or lower cT3/T4Nx or cTxN+ rectal adenocarcinoma who had received radiochemotherapy (45-50 Gy radiation dose with fluorouracil or capecitabine).</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Patients were randomly assigned to undergo total mesorectal excision either 7 weeks or 11 weeks after radiochemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes measures: </strong>Overall survival and disease-free survival at 5-year follow-up and low anterior resection syndrome score assessed after 2 years of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 265 patients enrolled, 133 were randomized in the 7-week group and 132 in the 11-week group. Twelve patients were excluded because they did not undergo resection. Among 253 patients analyzed, 5-year overall survival was not different between the 2 groups (81.6% in the 7-week group vs 82.6% in the 11-week group, p = 0.827), and neither was the 5-year disease-free survival (70.4% in the 7-week group vs 69.5% in the 11-week group, p = 0.856). No difference was observed between the 2 groups for distant recurrence (27.4% in the 7-week group vs 25.7% in the 11-week group, p = 0.777) or local recurrence (8.4% in the 7-week group vs 10.2% in the 11-week group, p = 0.543). The low anterior resection syndrome score was similar between the 7-week (25.0; interquartile range, 15.0-34.0) and 11-week groups (23.0; interquartile range, 14.2-32.0; p = 0.743).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The response rate to the low anterior resection syndrome questionnaire was only 52%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Extending the waiting period between radiochemotherapy and resection from 7 to 11 weeks does not change the 5-year oncological prognosis in rectal cancer or the 2-year low anterior resection occurrence. See Video Abstract.</p><p><strong>Resultados finales del ensayo greccar sobre el perodo de espera tras la radioquimioterapia neoadyuvante para el cncer de recto localmente avanzado aos de seguimiento: </strong>ANTECEDENTES:Se debate el posible beneficio oncológico de prolongar el periodo de espera entre la radioquimioterapia neoadyuvante y la resección quirúrgica del cáncer de recto.OBJETIVO:Evaluar el impacto de la prolongación de este periodo de espera sobre el pronóstico oncológico a 5 años y el resultado funcional a 2 años del adenocarcinoma rectal localmente avanzado.DISEÑO:Ensayo controlado d
背景:延长直肠癌新辅助放化疗和手术切除之间的等待时间对肿瘤的潜在益处存在争议:延长直肠癌新辅助放化疗和手术切除之间的等待期对肿瘤的潜在益处尚存争议:评估延长等待期对局部晚期直肠腺癌 5 年肿瘤预后和 2 年功能结果的影响:III期、多中心、随机、开放标签、平行组对照试验:24个结肠直肠癌中心的患者:非转移性中、下cT3-4或TxN+直肠腺癌患者,接受过放射化疗(45至50 Gy,氟尿嘧啶或卡培他滨):干预措施:随机分配患者在放化疗后7周(W7)或11周(W11)接受全直肠系膜切除术:随访5年后的总生存率和无病生存率,以及随访2年后的低前切除综合征评分:在265名入选患者中,133人被随机分配到7周组,132人被随机分配到11周组。12名患者因未接受切除手术而被排除在外。在分析的253名患者中,两组的5年总生存率(7周组81.6%对11周组82.6%,P = 0.827)和5年无病生存率(7周组70.4%对11周组69.5%,P = 0.856)没有差异。在远处复发(7周组为27.4%,11周组为25.7%,P = 0.777)或局部复发(7周组为8.4%,11周组为10.2%,P = 0.543)方面,两组间未观察到差异。7周组(25.0 IQR [15.0-34.0])和11周组(23.0 IQR [14.2-32.0],p = 0.743)的低前切除综合征评分相似:局限性:LARS问卷的回复率仅为52%:结论:将放化疗和切除术之间的等待时间从 7 周延长至 11 周,不会改变直肠癌的 5 年肿瘤预后和 2 年低位前切除发生率。
{"title":"Final Results of the GRECCAR-6 Trial on Waiting Period Following Neoadjuvant Radiochemotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: 5 Years of Follow-up.","authors":"Maxime K Collard, Laurent Mineur, Célia Nekrouf, Quentin Denost, Philippe Rouanet, Cécile de Chaisemartin, Aude Merdrignac, Mehrdad Jafari, Eddy Cotte, Jérôme Desrame, Gilles Manceau, Stéphane Benoist, Etienne Buscail, Mehdi Karoui, Yves Panis, Guillaume Piessen, Alain Saudemont, Michel Prudhomme, Frédérique Peschaud, Anne Dubois, Jérôme Loriau, Jean-Jacques Tuech, Emilie Duchalais, Renato M Lupinacci, Nicolas Goasguen, Tabassome Simon, Yann Parc, Jérémie H Lefevre","doi":"10.1097/DCR.0000000000003477","DOIUrl":"10.1097/DCR.0000000000003477","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;The potential oncological benefit of extending the waiting period between neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and surgical resection for rectal cancer is debated.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;To evaluate the impact of prolonging this waiting period on the 5-year oncological prognosis and 2-year functional result of locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Design: &lt;/strong&gt;Phase III, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, controlled trial.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Settings: &lt;/strong&gt;Patients were enrolled from 24 colorectal centers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Patients: &lt;/strong&gt;Patients with nonmetastatic mid or lower cT3/T4Nx or cTxN+ rectal adenocarcinoma who had received radiochemotherapy (45-50 Gy radiation dose with fluorouracil or capecitabine).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Intervention: &lt;/strong&gt;Patients were randomly assigned to undergo total mesorectal excision either 7 weeks or 11 weeks after radiochemotherapy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Main outcomes measures: &lt;/strong&gt;Overall survival and disease-free survival at 5-year follow-up and low anterior resection syndrome score assessed after 2 years of follow-up.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Among 265 patients enrolled, 133 were randomized in the 7-week group and 132 in the 11-week group. Twelve patients were excluded because they did not undergo resection. Among 253 patients analyzed, 5-year overall survival was not different between the 2 groups (81.6% in the 7-week group vs 82.6% in the 11-week group, p = 0.827), and neither was the 5-year disease-free survival (70.4% in the 7-week group vs 69.5% in the 11-week group, p = 0.856). No difference was observed between the 2 groups for distant recurrence (27.4% in the 7-week group vs 25.7% in the 11-week group, p = 0.777) or local recurrence (8.4% in the 7-week group vs 10.2% in the 11-week group, p = 0.543). The low anterior resection syndrome score was similar between the 7-week (25.0; interquartile range, 15.0-34.0) and 11-week groups (23.0; interquartile range, 14.2-32.0; p = 0.743).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Limitations: &lt;/strong&gt;The response rate to the low anterior resection syndrome questionnaire was only 52%.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;Extending the waiting period between radiochemotherapy and resection from 7 to 11 weeks does not change the 5-year oncological prognosis in rectal cancer or the 2-year low anterior resection occurrence. See Video Abstract.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Resultados finales del ensayo greccar sobre el perodo de espera tras la radioquimioterapia neoadyuvante para el cncer de recto localmente avanzado aos de seguimiento: &lt;/strong&gt;ANTECEDENTES:Se debate el posible beneficio oncológico de prolongar el periodo de espera entre la radioquimioterapia neoadyuvante y la resección quirúrgica del cáncer de recto.OBJETIVO:Evaluar el impacto de la prolongación de este periodo de espera sobre el pronóstico oncológico a 5 años y el resultado funcional a 2 años del adenocarcinoma rectal localmente avanzado.DISEÑO:Ensayo controlado d","PeriodicalId":11299,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","volume":" ","pages":"199-208"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142603568","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Outcomes in Robotic-Assisted Compared to Laparoscopic-Assisted Colorectal Surgery in a Newly Established Colorectal Tertiary Center: Our Experience. 在新成立的结直肠三级中心进行机器人辅助结直肠手术与腹腔镜辅助结直肠手术的结果比较:我们的经验。
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-08 DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003346
Ahmed Alkhamis, Diaa Soliman, Sulaiman Almazeedi
{"title":"Outcomes in Robotic-Assisted Compared to Laparoscopic-Assisted Colorectal Surgery in a Newly Established Colorectal Tertiary Center: Our Experience.","authors":"Ahmed Alkhamis, Diaa Soliman, Sulaiman Almazeedi","doi":"10.1097/DCR.0000000000003346","DOIUrl":"10.1097/DCR.0000000000003346","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11299,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","volume":" ","pages":"125-127"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142603570","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Expert Commentary on Rectourethral Fistula.
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-13 DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003602
Judith C Hagedorn
{"title":"Expert Commentary on Rectourethral Fistula.","authors":"Judith C Hagedorn","doi":"10.1097/DCR.0000000000003602","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000003602","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11299,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","volume":"68 2","pages":"142-143"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143028169","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
February 2025 Translations.
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-21 DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003624
{"title":"February 2025 Translations.","authors":"","doi":"10.1097/DCR.0000000000003624","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000003624","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11299,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","volume":"68 2","pages":"e56-e98"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143028288","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Novel Technique: Colonic Sleeve Resection in Endometriosis. 新技术:子宫内膜异位症的结肠袖状切除术
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-12 DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003578
Michelle Zhiyun Chen, Stephen Pillinger
{"title":"Novel Technique: Colonic Sleeve Resection in Endometriosis.","authors":"Michelle Zhiyun Chen, Stephen Pillinger","doi":"10.1097/DCR.0000000000003578","DOIUrl":"10.1097/DCR.0000000000003578","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11299,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","volume":" ","pages":"e49-e50"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142616561","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Biologic Therapy Is Associated With Improved Oncologic Outcomes in Crohn's Disease-Associated Colorectal Cancer.
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-08 DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003550
Bhuwan Giri, Stefan D Holubar, David Liska, Olga Lavryk, Benjamin L Cohen, Michael A Valente, Scott R Steele, Leonardo C Duraes
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with Crohn's disease face an elevated risk of colorectal cancer, in part due to underlying chronic inflammation. Biologic therapy is the mainstay of medical treatment; however, the impact of treatment on colorectal cancer-related outcomes remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the association between prior exposure to biologic treatment and colorectal cancer-related outcomes in patients with underlying Crohn's disease.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Settings: </strong>High volume, tertiary colorectal surgery department.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adults (older than 18 years) diagnosed with Crohn's disease and colorectal cancer who underwent curative operation between 1998 and 2020.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Exposure to any biologic IBD medication before cancer diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Survival and recurrence outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 56 patients were included with a median age of 52.5 years (interquartile range, 18.9 years) at the time of surgery; 19 patients (33.9%) were treated with biologics before surgery; 10 (52.6%) received infliximab, 2 (10.5%) received adalimumab, and 7 (36.8%) received multiple biologics. Rectal cancer (57% vs 43.2%, p = 0.02) and well-differentiated or moderately differentiated tumors (93% vs 50%, p = 0.005) were more common in the biologic exposure group. Exposure to biologics was associated with a higher 5-year disease-free survival rate (80% vs 45%, p = 0.048), whereas the 5-year overall survival (93% vs 57%, p = 0.19) and 5-year recurrence rates (7% vs 31%, p = 0.18) were numerically but not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Retrospective, single-center study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with Crohn's disease and colorectal adenocarcinoma who underwent curative surgery, those previously exposed to biologic therapy were more likely to have well-differentiated or moderately differentiated tumors, which were more likely to be distal to the splenic flexure. Biologic exposure was associated with significantly higher 5-year disease-free survival. These findings suggest that treatment of inflammation in patients with Crohn's disease fundamentally alters carcinogenesis pathways. See Video Abstract.</p><p><strong>La terapia biolgica se asocia con mejores resultados oncolgicos en el cncer colorrectal asociado a la enfermedad de crohn: </strong>ANTECEDENTES:Los pacientes con enfermedad de Crohn enfrentan un riesgo elevado de cáncer colorrectal, en parte debido a la inflamación crónica subyacente. La terapia biológica es el pilar del tratamiento médico; sin embargo, el impacto del tratamiento en los resultados relacionados con el cáncer colorrectal sigue sin estar claro.OBJETIVO:Investigar la asociación entre la exposición previa al tratamiento biológico y los resultados relacionados con el cáncer
{"title":"Biologic Therapy Is Associated With Improved Oncologic Outcomes in Crohn's Disease-Associated Colorectal Cancer.","authors":"Bhuwan Giri, Stefan D Holubar, David Liska, Olga Lavryk, Benjamin L Cohen, Michael A Valente, Scott R Steele, Leonardo C Duraes","doi":"10.1097/DCR.0000000000003550","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000003550","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Patients with Crohn's disease face an elevated risk of colorectal cancer, in part due to underlying chronic inflammation. Biologic therapy is the mainstay of medical treatment; however, the impact of treatment on colorectal cancer-related outcomes remains unclear.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;To investigate the association between prior exposure to biologic treatment and colorectal cancer-related outcomes in patients with underlying Crohn's disease.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Design: &lt;/strong&gt;Retrospective cohort study.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Settings: &lt;/strong&gt;High volume, tertiary colorectal surgery department.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Patients: &lt;/strong&gt;Adults (older than 18 years) diagnosed with Crohn's disease and colorectal cancer who underwent curative operation between 1998 and 2020.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Interventions: &lt;/strong&gt;Exposure to any biologic IBD medication before cancer diagnosis.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Main outcome measures: &lt;/strong&gt;Survival and recurrence outcomes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;A total of 56 patients were included with a median age of 52.5 years (interquartile range, 18.9 years) at the time of surgery; 19 patients (33.9%) were treated with biologics before surgery; 10 (52.6%) received infliximab, 2 (10.5%) received adalimumab, and 7 (36.8%) received multiple biologics. Rectal cancer (57% vs 43.2%, p = 0.02) and well-differentiated or moderately differentiated tumors (93% vs 50%, p = 0.005) were more common in the biologic exposure group. Exposure to biologics was associated with a higher 5-year disease-free survival rate (80% vs 45%, p = 0.048), whereas the 5-year overall survival (93% vs 57%, p = 0.19) and 5-year recurrence rates (7% vs 31%, p = 0.18) were numerically but not statistically significant.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Limitations: &lt;/strong&gt;Retrospective, single-center study.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;In patients with Crohn's disease and colorectal adenocarcinoma who underwent curative surgery, those previously exposed to biologic therapy were more likely to have well-differentiated or moderately differentiated tumors, which were more likely to be distal to the splenic flexure. Biologic exposure was associated with significantly higher 5-year disease-free survival. These findings suggest that treatment of inflammation in patients with Crohn's disease fundamentally alters carcinogenesis pathways. See Video Abstract.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;La terapia biolgica se asocia con mejores resultados oncolgicos en el cncer colorrectal asociado a la enfermedad de crohn: &lt;/strong&gt;ANTECEDENTES:Los pacientes con enfermedad de Crohn enfrentan un riesgo elevado de cáncer colorrectal, en parte debido a la inflamación crónica subyacente. La terapia biológica es el pilar del tratamiento médico; sin embargo, el impacto del tratamiento en los resultados relacionados con el cáncer colorrectal sigue sin estar claro.OBJETIVO:Investigar la asociación entre la exposición previa al tratamiento biológico y los resultados relacionados con el cáncer","PeriodicalId":11299,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","volume":"68 2","pages":"227-233"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143028213","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of Anastomotic Leakage After Colorectal Cancer Surgery on Quality of Life: A Systematic Review. 结直肠癌手术后吻合口漏对生活质量的影响:系统回顾
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-23 DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003478
Anke H C Gielen, Danique J I Heuvelings, Patricia Sylla, Yu-Ting van Loon, Jarno Melenhorst, Nicole D Bouvy, Merel L Kimman, Stephanie O Breukink

Background: Colorectal anastomotic leakage remains one of the most frequent and dreaded postoperative complications after colorectal resection. However, limited research has been conducted on the impact of this complication on the quality of life of patients who have undergone colorectal cancer surgery.

Objective: The aim of this systematic review was to identify, appraise, and synthesize the available evidence regarding the quality of life in patients with anastomotic leakage after oncological colorectal resections to inform clinical decision-making.

Data sources and study selection: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies reporting quality of life using validated questionnaires in patients with anastomotic leakage after oncological colorectal resections. The literature search was performed systematically and according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

Outcomes: Outcomes from quality-of-life questionnaires of patients with and without anastomotic leakage were analyzed.

Results: Thirteen articles reporting on 4618 individual patients were included, among which 527 patients developed anastomotic leakage. Quality of life was evaluated using 10 distinct questionnaires administered at various postoperative time points, ranging from 1 month to 14 years. Quality-of-life outcomes differed across studies and time points, but overall scores were most negatively affected by anastomotic leakage up to 12 months postoperatively.

Limitations: There was a high heterogeneity between the included studies based on the questionnaires used and the time of assessment.

Conclusions: The published evidence suggests that anastomotic leakage after oncologic colorectal resection is associated with impaired quality of life, especially within the first postoperative year. The impact of anastomotic leakage on quality of life warrants further evaluation and discussion with patients.

背景:结直肠吻合口漏仍是结直肠切除术后最常见、最可怕的术后并发症之一。然而,有关这种并发症对接受结直肠癌手术患者生活质量的影响的研究却很有限:本系统性综述旨在识别、评估和综合有关肿瘤性结直肠切除术后吻合口漏患者生活质量的现有证据,为临床决策提供参考:我们在 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆中检索了使用有效问卷对肿瘤性结直肠切除术后吻合口漏患者的生活质量进行报告的研究。文献检索按照 PRISMA 指南系统地进行:结果:分析了有吻合口漏和无吻合口漏患者的生活质量问卷评分结果:结果:共收录了13篇报道4618名患者的文章,其中527名患者出现了吻合口漏。在不同的术后时间点(从 1 个月到 14 年不等),使用十种不同的问卷对患者的生活质量进行了评估。不同研究和不同时间点的生活质量结果各不相同,但术后12个月内吻合口漏对总体评分的负面影响最大:局限性:根据所使用的问卷和评估时间,纳入的研究之间存在很大的异质性:已发表的证据表明,肿瘤性结直肠切除术后吻合口漏与生活质量受损有关,尤其是在术后第一年内。吻合口漏对生活质量的影响值得进一步评估并与患者进行讨论。
{"title":"Impact of Anastomotic Leakage After Colorectal Cancer Surgery on Quality of Life: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Anke H C Gielen, Danique J I Heuvelings, Patricia Sylla, Yu-Ting van Loon, Jarno Melenhorst, Nicole D Bouvy, Merel L Kimman, Stephanie O Breukink","doi":"10.1097/DCR.0000000000003478","DOIUrl":"10.1097/DCR.0000000000003478","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colorectal anastomotic leakage remains one of the most frequent and dreaded postoperative complications after colorectal resection. However, limited research has been conducted on the impact of this complication on the quality of life of patients who have undergone colorectal cancer surgery.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this systematic review was to identify, appraise, and synthesize the available evidence regarding the quality of life in patients with anastomotic leakage after oncological colorectal resections to inform clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Data sources and study selection: </strong>PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies reporting quality of life using validated questionnaires in patients with anastomotic leakage after oncological colorectal resections. The literature search was performed systematically and according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Outcomes from quality-of-life questionnaires of patients with and without anastomotic leakage were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen articles reporting on 4618 individual patients were included, among which 527 patients developed anastomotic leakage. Quality of life was evaluated using 10 distinct questionnaires administered at various postoperative time points, ranging from 1 month to 14 years. Quality-of-life outcomes differed across studies and time points, but overall scores were most negatively affected by anastomotic leakage up to 12 months postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>There was a high heterogeneity between the included studies based on the questionnaires used and the time of assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The published evidence suggests that anastomotic leakage after oncologic colorectal resection is associated with impaired quality of life, especially within the first postoperative year. The impact of anastomotic leakage on quality of life warrants further evaluation and discussion with patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":11299,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","volume":" ","pages":"154-170"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11748909/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142497001","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rectal Cancer Watch-and-Wait Management: Experience of 545 Patients From the US Rectal Cancer Research Group. 直肠癌观察与等待管理:美国直肠癌研究小组 545 名患者的经验。
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-07 DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003586
Samuel H Lai, Maria Widmar, John R T Monson, Fergal J Fleming, Arden M Morris, Jon D Vogel
<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of a watch-and-wait management strategy after a complete clinical response to neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer is increasing. However, insights into implementation, treatments, and outcomes on a national level in the United States are limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate and report on watch-and-wait management practices and outcomes in the United States.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Multicenter.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients with stage II or III rectal cancer who underwent intentional watch-and-wait management between January 2015 and August 2022.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Patient and tumor characteristics, neoadjuvant treatment and response, local cancer regrowth and metastasis, salvage surgery, overall survival, and disease-specific survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 545 patients from 33 centers, follow-up was 21 months (range, 9-37). Total neoadjuvant therapy or other types of neoadjuvant therapy were used in 395 (72%) and 150 (28%) patients, respectively. The estimated 3-year local regrowth rate was 23.8% (95% CI, 19.1%-29.4%). Patients with local regrowth had higher distant metastases incidence (14.2% vs 3.5%, p < 0.001). Salvage surgery was performed in 74 of 84 patients (88%) with local regrowth and included rectal resection in 66 patients (89%) and local excision in 8 (11%). Of 64 salvage resections with known pathology results, 58 (91%) were margin-negative. Overall, 3-year overall survival was 94.8% (95% CI, 90.5%-97.2%) and 3-year disease-specific survival was 96.2% (95% CI, 91.8%-98.2%). Patients with and without local regrowth exhibited 3-year overall survival of 83.6% (95% CI, 68.4%-91.9%) and 97.7% (95% CI, 93.3%-99.2%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This multicenter study indicates that the watch-and-wait approach for locally advanced rectal cancer is feasible with acceptable outcomes across a variety of geographical regions and practice settings in the United States. Local regrowth and distant metastasis rates were within published norms and salvage surgery proved effective. See Video Abstract .</p><p><strong>Manejo de espera y observacin del cncer rectal experiencia de pacientes del grupo de investigacin del cncer rectal de ee uu: </strong>ANTECEDENTES:El uso de una estrategia de manejo de observación y espera después de una respuesta clínica completa a la terapia neoadyuvante para el cáncer de recto está aumentando. Sin embargo, los conocimientos sobre la implementación, los tratamientos y los resultados, a nivel nacional de los Estados Unidos, son limitados.OBJETIVO:Investigar e informar sobre las prácticas y los resultados del manejo de observación y espera en los EE. UU.DISEÑO:Estudio retrospectivo.ESCENARIO:Multicéntrico.PACIENTES:Pacientes con cáncer de recto en estadio II o III que s
背景:直肠癌新辅助治疗完全临床应答后,观察和等待管理策略的使用越来越多。然而,在美国全国范围内,对该策略的实施、治疗和结果的了解还很有限:调查并报告美国的观察与等待管理实践和结果:设计:回顾性研究:患者:II期或III期直肠癌患者2015年1月至2022年8月期间接受有意观察和等待管理的II期或III期直肠癌患者:患者和肿瘤特征、新辅助治疗和反应、局部癌症再生和转移、挽救手术、总生存期和疾病特异性生存期:在来自33个中心的545名患者中,随访时间为21个月(9-37个月)。分别有395例(72%)和150例(28%)患者采用了新辅助治疗或其他类型的新辅助治疗。估计3年局部再生率为23.8%(95% CI:19.1-29.4%)。局部再生患者的远处转移发生率较高(14.2% 对 3.5%,P < 0.001)。74/84(88%)例局部再生患者接受了挽救手术,其中66例(89%)接受了直肠切除术,8例(11%)接受了局部切除术。在 64 例已知病理结果的挽救性切除术中,58 例(91%)为边缘阴性。总体而言,3 年总生存率为 94.8%(95% CI:90.5 - 97.2%),3 年疾病特异性生存率为 96.2%(95% Cl 91.8 - 98.2%)。有局部再生和无局部再生的患者3年总生存率分别为83.6%(95% Cl 68.4 - 91.9%)和97.7%(95% CI:93.3 - 99.2%):局限性:回顾性研究:这项多中心研究表明,对局部晚期直肠癌采取观察和等待的方法是可行的,其结果在美国不同的地理区域和实践环境中都是可以接受的。局部再生率和远处转移率均在公布的标准范围内,抢救性手术证明是有效的。参见视频摘要。
{"title":"Rectal Cancer Watch-and-Wait Management: Experience of 545 Patients From the US Rectal Cancer Research Group.","authors":"Samuel H Lai, Maria Widmar, John R T Monson, Fergal J Fleming, Arden M Morris, Jon D Vogel","doi":"10.1097/DCR.0000000000003586","DOIUrl":"10.1097/DCR.0000000000003586","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;The use of a watch-and-wait management strategy after a complete clinical response to neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer is increasing. However, insights into implementation, treatments, and outcomes on a national level in the United States are limited.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;To investigate and report on watch-and-wait management practices and outcomes in the United States.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Design: &lt;/strong&gt;Retrospective study.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Setting: &lt;/strong&gt;Multicenter.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Patients: &lt;/strong&gt;Patients with stage II or III rectal cancer who underwent intentional watch-and-wait management between January 2015 and August 2022.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Main outcome measures: &lt;/strong&gt;Patient and tumor characteristics, neoadjuvant treatment and response, local cancer regrowth and metastasis, salvage surgery, overall survival, and disease-specific survival.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Among 545 patients from 33 centers, follow-up was 21 months (range, 9-37). Total neoadjuvant therapy or other types of neoadjuvant therapy were used in 395 (72%) and 150 (28%) patients, respectively. The estimated 3-year local regrowth rate was 23.8% (95% CI, 19.1%-29.4%). Patients with local regrowth had higher distant metastases incidence (14.2% vs 3.5%, p &lt; 0.001). Salvage surgery was performed in 74 of 84 patients (88%) with local regrowth and included rectal resection in 66 patients (89%) and local excision in 8 (11%). Of 64 salvage resections with known pathology results, 58 (91%) were margin-negative. Overall, 3-year overall survival was 94.8% (95% CI, 90.5%-97.2%) and 3-year disease-specific survival was 96.2% (95% CI, 91.8%-98.2%). Patients with and without local regrowth exhibited 3-year overall survival of 83.6% (95% CI, 68.4%-91.9%) and 97.7% (95% CI, 93.3%-99.2%), respectively.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Limitations: &lt;/strong&gt;Retrospective study.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;This multicenter study indicates that the watch-and-wait approach for locally advanced rectal cancer is feasible with acceptable outcomes across a variety of geographical regions and practice settings in the United States. Local regrowth and distant metastasis rates were within published norms and salvage surgery proved effective. See Video Abstract .&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Manejo de espera y observacin del cncer rectal experiencia de pacientes del grupo de investigacin del cncer rectal de ee uu: &lt;/strong&gt;ANTECEDENTES:El uso de una estrategia de manejo de observación y espera después de una respuesta clínica completa a la terapia neoadyuvante para el cáncer de recto está aumentando. Sin embargo, los conocimientos sobre la implementación, los tratamientos y los resultados, a nivel nacional de los Estados Unidos, son limitados.OBJETIVO:Investigar e informar sobre las prácticas y los resultados del manejo de observación y espera en los EE. UU.DISEÑO:Estudio retrospectivo.ESCENARIO:Multicéntrico.PACIENTES:Pacientes con cáncer de recto en estadio II o III que s","PeriodicalId":11299,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","volume":" ","pages":"180-189"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142603572","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Announcements.
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-21 DOI: 10.1097/01.dcr.0001098252.25156.7b
{"title":"Announcements.","authors":"","doi":"10.1097/01.dcr.0001098252.25156.7b","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.dcr.0001098252.25156.7b","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11299,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","volume":"68 2","pages":"e99"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143028207","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1