首页 > 最新文献

Diseases of the Colon & Rectum最新文献

英文 中文
National Analysis of Over 48,000 Veterans With HIV Demonstrates CD4/CD8 Ratio as a Risk Marker for Anal Intraepithelial Lesions and Anal Cancer. 对48000多名感染HIV的退伍军人的全国分析表明,CD4/CD8比值是肛门上皮内病变和肛门癌的风险标志。
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003611
Austin Hewitt, Matthew J Freeman, Glen Leverson, Howard H Bailey, Evie Carchman, Rob Striker, Cristina B Sanger

Background: Anal squamous intraepithelial lesions are identifiable and treatable precancerous lesions that lack defined risk factors determining screening necessity.

Objective: Assess the prevalence and risk factors associated with low- and high-grade anal squamous intraepithelial lesions and anal squamous cell carcinoma.

Design: Retrospective cohort analysis of veterans with HIV between 1999-2023.

Settings: National multicenter study of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Patients: Veterans with HIV who had >1 year of follow-up and no anal squamous intraepithelial lesions or anal cancer diagnosis prior to the study period.

Main outcomes and measures: Primary outcomes include the prevalence, disease-free survival rates, and hazard ratios associated with risk factors for developing anal squamous intraepithelial lesions and/or anal cancer.

Results: 48,368 patients were analyzed. The average age of patients at study initiation was 47.8 years with a mean follow-up of 12.3 years. 7,572 (16%) patients had at least one anal cytopathology or histopathology result. Prevalence of anal disease was recorded for low-grade disease (n = 1,513, 3.1%), high-grade disease (n = 1,484, 3.1%), and cancer (n = 664, 1.4%). Mean times to first incident low-grade disease, high-grade disease, and cancer were 8.5 (SD = 6.0), 9.1 (SD = 6.0), and 9.7 (SD = 6.2) years, respectively. 5-year, 10-year, and 20-year disease-free survival rates for development of low-grade disease, high-grade disease, or cancer were 97.5%, 94.5%, and 88.4%, respectively. Cox regression modeling demonstrated CD4/CD8 ratios <0.5 were associated with increased risk of anal cancer (HR: 3.93, 95% CI: 3.33-4.63, p < 0.001).

Limitations: Retrospective study that focuses almost exclusively on male U.S. veterans. Results might not apply to non-male, non-U.S. populations.

Conclusions: National analysis of over 48,000 veterans with HIV demonstrates 16% had anal cytopathology or histopathology results with an anal cancer prevalence of 1.4%. CD4/CD8 ratios <0.5 correlate strongly with severity of anal disease and can help identify patients at highest risk for anal cancer to prioritize screening efforts. See Video Abstract.

背景:肛门鳞状上皮内病变是可识别和可治疗的癌前病变,缺乏确定的危险因素决定筛查的必要性。目的:评估低级别和高级别肛门鳞状上皮内病变和肛门鳞状细胞癌的患病率和相关危险因素。设计:对1999-2023年感染HIV的退伍军人进行回顾性队列分析。背景:退伍军人事务部的国家多中心研究。患者:感染HIV的退伍军人,随访10 ~ 10年,研究前无肛门鳞状上皮内病变或肛门癌诊断。主要结局和测量:主要结局包括患病率、无病生存率和与发生肛门鳞状上皮内病变和/或肛门癌的危险因素相关的风险比。结果:共分析48368例患者。研究开始时患者的平均年龄为47.8岁,平均随访时间为12.3年。7572例(16%)患者至少有一项肛门细胞病理学或组织病理学结果。肛门疾病的患病率记录为低级别疾病(n = 1,513, 3.1%),高级别疾病(n = 1,484, 3.1%)和癌症(n = 664, 1.4%)。首次发生低级别疾病、高级别疾病和癌症的平均时间分别为8.5 (SD = 6.0)、9.1 (SD = 6.0)和9.7 (SD = 6.2)年。低级别疾病、高级别疾病或癌症的5年、10年和20年无病生存率分别为97.5%、94.5%和88.4%。Cox回归模型显示CD4/CD8比值局限性:回顾性研究几乎只关注美国男性退伍军人。结果可能不适用于非男性,非美国。人群。结论:对48,000多名感染艾滋病毒的退伍军人的全国分析显示,16%的人有肛门细胞病理学或组织病理学结果,肛门癌患病率为1.4%。CD4 / CD8比值
{"title":"National Analysis of Over 48,000 Veterans With HIV Demonstrates CD4/CD8 Ratio as a Risk Marker for Anal Intraepithelial Lesions and Anal Cancer.","authors":"Austin Hewitt, Matthew J Freeman, Glen Leverson, Howard H Bailey, Evie Carchman, Rob Striker, Cristina B Sanger","doi":"10.1097/DCR.0000000000003611","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000003611","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anal squamous intraepithelial lesions are identifiable and treatable precancerous lesions that lack defined risk factors determining screening necessity.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Assess the prevalence and risk factors associated with low- and high-grade anal squamous intraepithelial lesions and anal squamous cell carcinoma.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort analysis of veterans with HIV between 1999-2023.</p><p><strong>Settings: </strong>National multicenter study of the Department of Veterans Affairs.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Veterans with HIV who had >1 year of follow-up and no anal squamous intraepithelial lesions or anal cancer diagnosis prior to the study period.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Primary outcomes include the prevalence, disease-free survival rates, and hazard ratios associated with risk factors for developing anal squamous intraepithelial lesions and/or anal cancer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>48,368 patients were analyzed. The average age of patients at study initiation was 47.8 years with a mean follow-up of 12.3 years. 7,572 (16%) patients had at least one anal cytopathology or histopathology result. Prevalence of anal disease was recorded for low-grade disease (n = 1,513, 3.1%), high-grade disease (n = 1,484, 3.1%), and cancer (n = 664, 1.4%). Mean times to first incident low-grade disease, high-grade disease, and cancer were 8.5 (SD = 6.0), 9.1 (SD = 6.0), and 9.7 (SD = 6.2) years, respectively. 5-year, 10-year, and 20-year disease-free survival rates for development of low-grade disease, high-grade disease, or cancer were 97.5%, 94.5%, and 88.4%, respectively. Cox regression modeling demonstrated CD4/CD8 ratios <0.5 were associated with increased risk of anal cancer (HR: 3.93, 95% CI: 3.33-4.63, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Retrospective study that focuses almost exclusively on male U.S. veterans. Results might not apply to non-male, non-U.S. populations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>National analysis of over 48,000 veterans with HIV demonstrates 16% had anal cytopathology or histopathology results with an anal cancer prevalence of 1.4%. CD4/CD8 ratios <0.5 correlate strongly with severity of anal disease and can help identify patients at highest risk for anal cancer to prioritize screening efforts. See Video Abstract.</p>","PeriodicalId":11299,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142913572","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Endoscopic and Transanal Management of Anastomotic Leak. 吻合口瘘的内镜及经肛治疗。
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003635
Grace M Crouch, Amanda McClure
{"title":"Endoscopic and Transanal Management of Anastomotic Leak.","authors":"Grace M Crouch, Amanda McClure","doi":"10.1097/DCR.0000000000003635","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000003635","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11299,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142913571","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
TEMPOUR: A Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing Perioperative Use of An Alpha-1-Blocker to Reduce Postoperative Urinary Retention Following Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery Procedures. TEMPOUR:一项随机对照试验评估围手术期使用α -1阻滞剂减少经肛门内窥镜显微手术后尿潴留。
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003623
Thomas Couture, Claudya Morin, Janyssa Charbonneau, Émilie Papillon-Dion, Alexandre Bouchard, François Rouleau-Fournier, Philippe Bouchard, François Letarte, Alexis F Turgeon

Background: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is a treatment option for a wide range of rectal lesions. Postoperative urinary retention is a frequently associated complication. Some studies have suggested that the use of alpha-1-blockers may reduce the risk of postoperative urinary retention after hernia and colorectal surgery, but evidence is lacking.

Objective: This trial aims to evaluate if prophylactic use of an alpha-1-blocker reduces the rate of postoperative urinary retention following transanal endoscopic microsurgery.

Design: Double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Settings: Single high-volume Canadian colorectal center.

Patients: Adult male patients awaiting transanal endoscopic microsurgery and not on alpha-1-blocker were included.

Intervention: Patients were allocated to either Tamsulosin or placebo from 5 days prior to surgery to 2 days postoperatively.

Main outcomes measures: The primary outcome was the incidence of post-operative urinary retention. Secondary outcomes were urinary retention-related hospitalization, time to removal of bladder catheter and International Prostate Symptom Score, before and after treatment, and adverse events.

Results: 158 patients were randomized between October 2017 and July 2022. There was no significant difference in postoperative urinary retention between groups (23% vs 14%; p = 0.16) respectively in the tamsolusin and placebo groups. Time to removal of bladder catheter was not statistically different between groups (4.8 vs 8.6 days, p = 0.26). No failure of same-day discharge, nor readmissions related to urinary retention occurred. International Prostate Symptom Scores were not significantly different at the time of surgery (3.8 vs 5.4; p = 0.11) and reported adverse events did not differ between groups.

Limitations: We cannot exclude a potential type II error.

Conclusion: Prophylactic use of an alpha-1-blocker for patients undergoing transanal endoscopic microsurgery was not associated with a reduction in post-operative urinary retention. See Video Abstract.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03314025.

背景:经肛门内窥镜显微手术是广泛的直肠病变的治疗选择。术后尿潴留是常见的并发症。一些研究表明,使用α -1受体阻滞剂可以降低疝和结直肠手术后尿潴留的风险,但缺乏证据。目的:本试验旨在评估预防性使用α -1受体阻滞剂是否能降低经肛门内镜显微手术后尿潴留的发生率。设计:双盲、安慰剂对照试验。设置:单个高容量的加拿大结直肠癌中心。患者:包括等待经肛门内窥镜显微手术且未使用α -1受体阻滞剂的成年男性患者。干预:从术前5天到术后2天,患者被分配到坦索罗辛或安慰剂组。主要观察指标:主要观察指标为术后尿潴留发生率。次要结局为尿潴留相关住院、拔除膀胱导管时间、国际前列腺症状评分、治疗前后以及不良事件。结果:158例患者在2017年10月至2022年7月期间被随机分组。两组术后尿潴留无显著差异(23% vs 14%;P = 0.16)。两组患者拔除膀胱导管的时间差异无统计学意义(4.8天vs 8.6天,p = 0.26)。无当日出院失败,无尿潴留相关再入院。国际前列腺症状评分在手术时无显著差异(3.8 vs 5.4;P = 0.11),报告的不良事件组间无差异。局限性:我们不能排除潜在的II型错误。结论:经肛门内镜显微手术患者预防性使用α -1阻滞剂与术后尿潴留的减少无关。参见视频摘要。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03314025。
{"title":"TEMPOUR: A Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing Perioperative Use of An Alpha-1-Blocker to Reduce Postoperative Urinary Retention Following Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery Procedures.","authors":"Thomas Couture, Claudya Morin, Janyssa Charbonneau, Émilie Papillon-Dion, Alexandre Bouchard, François Rouleau-Fournier, Philippe Bouchard, François Letarte, Alexis F Turgeon","doi":"10.1097/DCR.0000000000003623","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000003623","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is a treatment option for a wide range of rectal lesions. Postoperative urinary retention is a frequently associated complication. Some studies have suggested that the use of alpha-1-blockers may reduce the risk of postoperative urinary retention after hernia and colorectal surgery, but evidence is lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This trial aims to evaluate if prophylactic use of an alpha-1-blocker reduces the rate of postoperative urinary retention following transanal endoscopic microsurgery.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Settings: </strong>Single high-volume Canadian colorectal center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adult male patients awaiting transanal endoscopic microsurgery and not on alpha-1-blocker were included.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Patients were allocated to either Tamsulosin or placebo from 5 days prior to surgery to 2 days postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes measures: </strong>The primary outcome was the incidence of post-operative urinary retention. Secondary outcomes were urinary retention-related hospitalization, time to removal of bladder catheter and International Prostate Symptom Score, before and after treatment, and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>158 patients were randomized between October 2017 and July 2022. There was no significant difference in postoperative urinary retention between groups (23% vs 14%; p = 0.16) respectively in the tamsolusin and placebo groups. Time to removal of bladder catheter was not statistically different between groups (4.8 vs 8.6 days, p = 0.26). No failure of same-day discharge, nor readmissions related to urinary retention occurred. International Prostate Symptom Scores were not significantly different at the time of surgery (3.8 vs 5.4; p = 0.11) and reported adverse events did not differ between groups.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>We cannot exclude a potential type II error.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prophylactic use of an alpha-1-blocker for patients undergoing transanal endoscopic microsurgery was not associated with a reduction in post-operative urinary retention. See Video Abstract.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03314025.</p>","PeriodicalId":11299,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142913902","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
To Pimp or Not to Pimp: That Is the Question. 拉皮条还是不拉皮条,这是个问题。
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003546
Lester Gottesman
{"title":"To Pimp or Not to Pimp: That Is the Question.","authors":"Lester Gottesman","doi":"10.1097/DCR.0000000000003546","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000003546","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11299,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142913905","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
EndoRobotic Submucosal Dissection After Total Neoadjuvant Treatment in Rectal Cancer. 直肠癌全新辅助治疗后的内镜下粘膜剥离。
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003591
Kamil Erozkan, Metincan Erkaya, Mehmet Ayhan Kuzu, Emre Gorgun
{"title":"EndoRobotic Submucosal Dissection After Total Neoadjuvant Treatment in Rectal Cancer.","authors":"Kamil Erozkan, Metincan Erkaya, Mehmet Ayhan Kuzu, Emre Gorgun","doi":"10.1097/DCR.0000000000003591","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000003591","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11299,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142913569","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Research Perspective on "Impact of Surgeon Specialization on Outcomes in Emergency Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis". 关于 "外科医生专业化对急诊结直肠手术结果的影响 "的研究观点:系统回顾与元分析 "的研究视角。
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-22 DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003557
Vlad V Simianu
{"title":"Research Perspective on \"Impact of Surgeon Specialization on Outcomes in Emergency Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis\".","authors":"Vlad V Simianu","doi":"10.1097/DCR.0000000000003557","DOIUrl":"10.1097/DCR.0000000000003557","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11299,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","volume":" ","pages":"31"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142460465","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Is Dilip's Transmucosal Internal Sphincterotomy a Modification of Closed Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy? 迪利普的经粘膜内括约肌切开术是对闭合侧内括约肌切开术的改良吗?
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-23 DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003567
Vipul D Yagnik, Kaushik Bhattacharya, Pankaj Garg
{"title":"Is Dilip's Transmucosal Internal Sphincterotomy a Modification of Closed Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy?","authors":"Vipul D Yagnik, Kaushik Bhattacharya, Pankaj Garg","doi":"10.1097/DCR.0000000000003567","DOIUrl":"10.1097/DCR.0000000000003567","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11299,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","volume":" ","pages":"e7"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142497002","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparing the Management Recommendations of Large Language Model and Colorectal Cancer Multidisciplinary Team: A Pilot Study. 比较大语言模型和结直肠癌多学科团队的管理建议:一项试点研究。
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-27 DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003504
Nir Horesh, Sameh Hany Emile, Shashank Gupta, Zoe Garoufalia, Rachel Gefen, Peige Zhou, Giovanna da Silva, Steven D Wexner
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Management of anorectal cancers requires a multidisciplinary team approach. Recently, large language models have been suggested as potential tools for various applications in health care.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Assess suggested management recommendations provided by a generative artificial intelligence chatbot with those of a colorectal cancer multidisciplinary team to evaluate applicability in clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Comparative pilot study where management recommendations from a generative artificial intelligence chatbot for patients with anal or colorectal cancers were compared against historical consensus decisions from multidisciplinary team meetings.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single referral tertiary center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Fifteen patients (mean age of 66.5 years; 53.5% woman) were included; 80% were primarily diagnosed with rectal cancer, predominantly stage II and III disease (46.6%). The mean tumor height from the anal verge was 4 cm.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>From a generative artificial intelligence chatbot, we generated management recommendations for each patient, which were subsequently compared to historical decisions from a multidisciplinary team to gauge concordance.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Primary outcomes included a degree of concordance between generative artificial intelligence chatbot recommendations and the multidisciplinary team decisions, assessed on a scale from 1 (complete disagreement) to 5 (complete agreement), and justification was evaluated by 3 experienced colorectal surgeons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A generative artificial intelligence chatbot achieved a high concordance rate with multidisciplinary team decisions, with an average concordance rating of 4.08. Multidisciplinary team treatment strategies included neoadjuvant therapy for 33.3% of patients, upfront surgery for 26.6%, and further diagnostic assessment for 20%. Interrater agreement on concordance was found to be moderate (κ coefficient range, 0.333-0.577), whereas agreement on decision justification was slight (κ coefficient range, 0.047-0.094).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Retrospective study with small sample size.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings indicate a high level of concordance between generative artificial intelligence chatbot recommendations and the decisions from a colorectal cancer multidisciplinary team, suggesting the potential of large language models to support clinical decision-making in the management of anal and colorectal cancers. See Video Abstract.</p><p><strong>Comparacin entre recomendaciones de manejo del modelo extenso de lenguaje y el equipo multidisciplinario de cncer colorrectal un estudio piloto: </strong>ANTECEDENTES:El manejo de los cánceres anorrectales requiere un enfoque de equipo multidisciplinario. Recientemente, se han sugerido modelos extensos de lenguaje como he
结论:研究结果表明,生成式人工智能聊天机器人的建议与多学科结直肠癌团队的决策高度一致,这表明广泛的语言模型在支持肛门癌和结肠癌管理的临床决策方面具有潜力。 翻译:菲德尔-鲁伊斯-希利博士)。
{"title":"Comparing the Management Recommendations of Large Language Model and Colorectal Cancer Multidisciplinary Team: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Nir Horesh, Sameh Hany Emile, Shashank Gupta, Zoe Garoufalia, Rachel Gefen, Peige Zhou, Giovanna da Silva, Steven D Wexner","doi":"10.1097/DCR.0000000000003504","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000003504","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Management of anorectal cancers requires a multidisciplinary team approach. Recently, large language models have been suggested as potential tools for various applications in health care.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;Assess suggested management recommendations provided by a generative artificial intelligence chatbot with those of a colorectal cancer multidisciplinary team to evaluate applicability in clinical settings.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Design: &lt;/strong&gt;Comparative pilot study where management recommendations from a generative artificial intelligence chatbot for patients with anal or colorectal cancers were compared against historical consensus decisions from multidisciplinary team meetings.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Setting: &lt;/strong&gt;Single referral tertiary center.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Patients: &lt;/strong&gt;Fifteen patients (mean age of 66.5 years; 53.5% woman) were included; 80% were primarily diagnosed with rectal cancer, predominantly stage II and III disease (46.6%). The mean tumor height from the anal verge was 4 cm.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Interventions: &lt;/strong&gt;From a generative artificial intelligence chatbot, we generated management recommendations for each patient, which were subsequently compared to historical decisions from a multidisciplinary team to gauge concordance.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Main outcome measures: &lt;/strong&gt;Primary outcomes included a degree of concordance between generative artificial intelligence chatbot recommendations and the multidisciplinary team decisions, assessed on a scale from 1 (complete disagreement) to 5 (complete agreement), and justification was evaluated by 3 experienced colorectal surgeons.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;A generative artificial intelligence chatbot achieved a high concordance rate with multidisciplinary team decisions, with an average concordance rating of 4.08. Multidisciplinary team treatment strategies included neoadjuvant therapy for 33.3% of patients, upfront surgery for 26.6%, and further diagnostic assessment for 20%. Interrater agreement on concordance was found to be moderate (κ coefficient range, 0.333-0.577), whereas agreement on decision justification was slight (κ coefficient range, 0.047-0.094).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Limitations: &lt;/strong&gt;Retrospective study with small sample size.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;The findings indicate a high level of concordance between generative artificial intelligence chatbot recommendations and the decisions from a colorectal cancer multidisciplinary team, suggesting the potential of large language models to support clinical decision-making in the management of anal and colorectal cancers. See Video Abstract.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Comparacin entre recomendaciones de manejo del modelo extenso de lenguaje y el equipo multidisciplinario de cncer colorrectal un estudio piloto: &lt;/strong&gt;ANTECEDENTES:El manejo de los cánceres anorrectales requiere un enfoque de equipo multidisciplinario. Recientemente, se han sugerido modelos extensos de lenguaje como he","PeriodicalId":11299,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","volume":"68 1","pages":"41-47"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142827842","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of Surgeon Specialization on Outcomes in Emergency Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. 外科医生专业化对急诊结直肠手术结果的影响:系统回顾与元分析》。
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-22 DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003418
Zachary Bunjo, Luke Traeger, Ishraq Murshed, Sergei Bedrikovetski, Nagendra N Dudi-Venkata, Christopher Dobbins, Tarik Sammour

Background: Colorectal emergencies represent a large proportion of acute general surgical workload and carry significant mortality.

Objective: Identify the influence of surgeon specialization on mortality and other outcomes in emergency colorectal surgery.

Data sources: Systematic searches of Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, and Cochrane electronic databases were performed for studies published from January 1, 1990, to August 27, 2023.

Study selection: Studies investigating outcomes in emergency colorectal surgery for adults, comparing colorectal against noncolorectal surgeon specialization, were included. Exclusion criteria were: 1) publications studying primarily pediatric populations; 2) studies incorporating patients who had undergone surgery before 1990; and 3) studies only published in abstract form or non-English language.

Main outcome measures: Primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were rates of anastomotic leak, reintervention, primary anastomosis, and laparoscopic approach.

Results: Of 7676 studies identified, 155 were selected for full-text review and 21 were included for quantitative analysis. Eleven studies showed improved 30-day (OR 0.64; 95% CI, 0.60-0.68; p < 0.0001) and in-hospital mortality (OR 0.66; 95% CI, 0.49-0.89; p = 0.007) with colorectal specialization. There was a significantly higher rate of primary anastomosis (OR 2.95; 95% CI, 2.02-4.31; p < 0.0001) and use of laparoscopic surgery (OR 2.38; 95% CI, 1.42-4.00; p = 0.001) among specialized colorectal surgeons. Specialization was also associated with a significant reduction in any stoma formation (OR 0.52; 95% CI, 0.28-0.98; p = 0.04). No significant difference was observed for anastomotic leak (OR 0.70; 95% CI, 0.45-1.07; p = 0.10) or reintervention rates (OR 0.78; 95% CI, 0.55-1.10; p = 0.16).

Limitations: Heterogeneity exists within the included patient populations and definitions of colorectal specialization observed in different countries.

Conclusions: Emergency colorectal surgery undertaken by specialized colorectal surgeons is associated with significantly improved postoperative mortality, lower rates of stoma formation, and increased rates of primary anastomosis and minimally invasive surgery.

Prospero registration: CRD42022300541.

背景:结直肠急诊占急性普外科工作量的很大一部分,死亡率很高:结直肠急诊在急诊普外科工作量中占很大比例,死亡率也很高:确定外科医生专业化对急诊结直肠手术死亡率和其他结果的影响:对Ovid MEDLINE、Ovid EMBASE和Cochrane电子数据库中1990年1月1日至2023年8月27日发表的研究进行系统检索:研究选择:纳入调查成人急诊结直肠手术结果的研究,比较结直肠外科医生与非结直肠外科医生的专业。排除标准包括(1)主要研究儿科人群的出版物;(2)纳入1990年之前接受手术的患者的研究;(3)仅以摘要形式发表或非英语语言的研究:主要结果:30 天死亡率和住院死亡率为主要结果。次要结果为吻合口渗漏率、再次手术率、初次吻合率和腹腔镜手术率:结果:在已确定的 7676 项研究中,有 155 项被选中进行全文综述,21 项被纳入进行定量分析。有 11 项研究显示,结直肠专科治疗可提高 30 天死亡率(OR 0.64,95% CI 0.60-0.68,p < 0.0001)和住院死亡率(OR 0.66,95% CI 0.49-0.89,p = 0.007)。专科结直肠外科医生的初次吻合率(OR 2.95,95% CI 2.02-4.31,p < 0.0001)和腹腔镜手术使用率(OR 2.38,95% CI 1.42-4.00,p = 0.001)明显更高。专业化也与造口的显著减少有关(OR 0.52,95% CI 0.28-0.98,p = 0.04)。吻合口漏(OR 0.70,95% CI 0.45-1.07,p = 0.10)或再介入率(OR 0.78,95% CI 0.55-1.10,p = 0.16)方面无明显差异:局限性:纳入的患者群体和不同国家的结直肠专科定义存在差异:由专业结直肠外科医生进行急诊结直肠手术可显著改善术后死亡率,降低造口形成率,提高初次吻合率和微创手术率:CRD42022300541。
{"title":"Impact of Surgeon Specialization on Outcomes in Emergency Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Zachary Bunjo, Luke Traeger, Ishraq Murshed, Sergei Bedrikovetski, Nagendra N Dudi-Venkata, Christopher Dobbins, Tarik Sammour","doi":"10.1097/DCR.0000000000003418","DOIUrl":"10.1097/DCR.0000000000003418","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colorectal emergencies represent a large proportion of acute general surgical workload and carry significant mortality.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Identify the influence of surgeon specialization on mortality and other outcomes in emergency colorectal surgery.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Systematic searches of Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, and Cochrane electronic databases were performed for studies published from January 1, 1990, to August 27, 2023.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Studies investigating outcomes in emergency colorectal surgery for adults, comparing colorectal against noncolorectal surgeon specialization, were included. Exclusion criteria were: 1) publications studying primarily pediatric populations; 2) studies incorporating patients who had undergone surgery before 1990; and 3) studies only published in abstract form or non-English language.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were rates of anastomotic leak, reintervention, primary anastomosis, and laparoscopic approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 7676 studies identified, 155 were selected for full-text review and 21 were included for quantitative analysis. Eleven studies showed improved 30-day (OR 0.64; 95% CI, 0.60-0.68; p < 0.0001) and in-hospital mortality (OR 0.66; 95% CI, 0.49-0.89; p = 0.007) with colorectal specialization. There was a significantly higher rate of primary anastomosis (OR 2.95; 95% CI, 2.02-4.31; p < 0.0001) and use of laparoscopic surgery (OR 2.38; 95% CI, 1.42-4.00; p = 0.001) among specialized colorectal surgeons. Specialization was also associated with a significant reduction in any stoma formation (OR 0.52; 95% CI, 0.28-0.98; p = 0.04). No significant difference was observed for anastomotic leak (OR 0.70; 95% CI, 0.45-1.07; p = 0.10) or reintervention rates (OR 0.78; 95% CI, 0.55-1.10; p = 0.16).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Heterogeneity exists within the included patient populations and definitions of colorectal specialization observed in different countries.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Emergency colorectal surgery undertaken by specialized colorectal surgeons is associated with significantly improved postoperative mortality, lower rates of stoma formation, and increased rates of primary anastomosis and minimally invasive surgery.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration: </strong>CRD42022300541.</p>","PeriodicalId":11299,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","volume":" ","pages":"14-30"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142460452","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Known Knowns and Unknown Unknowns. 已知的已知和未知的未知。
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-22 DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003376
Lester Gottesman
{"title":"Known Knowns and Unknown Unknowns.","authors":"Lester Gottesman","doi":"10.1097/DCR.0000000000003376","DOIUrl":"10.1097/DCR.0000000000003376","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11299,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","volume":" ","pages":"6-8"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142460453","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1