{"title":"Letter to the editor: perinodal signal in breast magnetic resonance imaging: flare sign and extracapsular spread.","authors":"Deniz Esin Tekcan Şanlı, Ahmet Necati Şanlı","doi":"10.4274/dir.2025.253578","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4274/dir.2025.253578","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11341,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and interventional radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145184920","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: Despite the large number of patients requiring percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) for acute cholecystitis (AC), no definitive results exist on the optimal imaging guidance modality, technique (Seldinger vs. trocar), or approach [transhepatic (TH) vs. transperitoneal]. This study evaluates the outcomes of ultrasound (US)-guided bedside PC using solely the TH approach and trocar technique in patients with AC.
Methods: A single-center retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary university hospital between 2018 and September 2023. The study included 81 patients with AC treated with US-guided bedside PC using the TH approach and trocar technique alone. Patients were diagnosed through clinical, laboratory, and radiological examinations, and an experienced interventional radiologist performed the procedures. Outcomes and complication rates were then evaluated.
Results: Technical and clinical success rates were 100% and 93%, respectively. No procedure-related complications occurred. Catheter dislodgement occurred in 4.9% (4/81). The catheter sizes used were 6 F (12.3%), 7 F (40.7%), 8 F (37%), and 10 F (9.9%). The median catheter dwell time was 42 days. Catheters were successfully removed in the majority of surviving patients following resolution of cholecystitis. At the end of the follow-up, 10 patients (12.3%) underwent elective cholecystectomy, and 12 patients (14.8%) died due to comorbidities with the catheter in place.
Conclusion: US-guided bedside PC using the TH approach and trocar technique is safe and effective for managing AC in high-risk patients. The study found no significant complications, highlighting the importance of thorough preprocedural evaluation and technique optimization. Further studies with larger, homogeneous patient groups are needed to compare outcomes across different PC techniques and approaches.
Clinical significance: Despite the growing adoption of PC in the management of AC, the definitive optimal access route and procedural technique remain unresolved. The current body of literature is limited by considerable heterogeneity across studies, including variability in technical approach, operator experience, patient coagulation profiles, and outcome definitions. This study exclusively employed bedside US-guided PC using the TH approach and trocar technique, and observed no procedure-related complications, including hemorrhage, bile leakage, infection, or abscess formation.
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided bedside percutaneous cholecystostomy using the transhepatic approach and trocar technique in patients with acute cholecystitis.","authors":"Ahmet Cem Demirşah, Berat Acu, Çiğdem Öztunalı","doi":"10.4274/dir.2025.253478","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4274/dir.2025.253478","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Despite the large number of patients requiring percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) for acute cholecystitis (AC), no definitive results exist on the optimal imaging guidance modality, technique (Seldinger vs. trocar), or approach [transhepatic (TH) vs. transperitoneal]. This study evaluates the outcomes of ultrasound (US)-guided bedside PC using solely the TH approach and trocar technique in patients with AC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary university hospital between 2018 and September 2023. The study included 81 patients with AC treated with US-guided bedside PC using the TH approach and trocar technique alone. Patients were diagnosed through clinical, laboratory, and radiological examinations, and an experienced interventional radiologist performed the procedures. Outcomes and complication rates were then evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Technical and clinical success rates were 100% and 93%, respectively. No procedure-related complications occurred. Catheter dislodgement occurred in 4.9% (4/81). The catheter sizes used were 6 F (12.3%), 7 F (40.7%), 8 F (37%), and 10 F (9.9%). The median catheter dwell time was 42 days. Catheters were successfully removed in the majority of surviving patients following resolution of cholecystitis. At the end of the follow-up, 10 patients (12.3%) underwent elective cholecystectomy, and 12 patients (14.8%) died due to comorbidities with the catheter in place.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>US-guided bedside PC using the TH approach and trocar technique is safe and effective for managing AC in high-risk patients. The study found no significant complications, highlighting the importance of thorough preprocedural evaluation and technique optimization. Further studies with larger, homogeneous patient groups are needed to compare outcomes across different PC techniques and approaches.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Despite the growing adoption of PC in the management of AC, the definitive optimal access route and procedural technique remain unresolved. The current body of literature is limited by considerable heterogeneity across studies, including variability in technical approach, operator experience, patient coagulation profiles, and outcome definitions. This study exclusively employed bedside US-guided PC using the TH approach and trocar technique, and observed no procedure-related complications, including hemorrhage, bile leakage, infection, or abscess formation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11341,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and interventional radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145185061","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) is an emerging imaging technology that promises to overcome the limitations of conventional energy-integrating detector (EID)-CT, particularly in thoracic oncology. This narrative review summarizes technical advances and clinical applications of PCD-CT in the thorax with emphasis on spatial resolution, dose-image-quality balance, and intrinsic spectral imaging, and it outlines practical implications relevant to thoracic oncology. A literature review of PubMed through May 31, 2025, was conducted using combinations of "photon counting," "computed tomography," "thoracic oncology," and "artificial intelligence." We screened the retrieved records and included studies with direct relevance to lung and mediastinal tumors, image quality, radiation dose, spectral/iodine imaging, or artificial intelligence-based reconstruction; case reports, editorials, and animal-only or purely methodological reports were excluded. PCD-CT demonstrated superior spatial resolution compared with EID-CT, enabling clearer visualization of fine pulmonary structures, such as bronchioles and subsolid nodules; slice thicknesses of approximately 0.4 mm and ex vivo resolvable structures approaching 0.11 mm have been reported. Across intraindividual clinical comparisons, radiation-dose reductions of 16%-43% have been achieved while maintaining or improving diagnostic image quality. Intrinsic spectral imaging enables accurate iodine mapping and low-keV virtual monoenergetic images and has shown quantitative advantages versus dual-energy CT in phantoms and early clinical work. Artificial intelligence-based deep-learning reconstruction and super-resolution can complement detector capabilities to reduce noise and stabilize fine-structure depiction without increasing dose. Potential reductions in contrast volume are biologically plausible given improved low-keV contrast-to-noise ratio, although clinical dose-finding data remain limited, and routine K-edge imaging has not yet translated to clinical thoracic practice. In conclusion, PCD-CT provides higher spatial and spectral fidelity at lower or comparable doses, supporting earlier and more precise tumor detection and characterization; future work should prioritize outcome-oriented trials, protocol harmonization, and implementation studies aligned with "Green Radiology".
{"title":"Photon-counting detector computed tomography in thoracic oncology: revolutionizing tumor imaging through precision and detail.","authors":"Masahiro Yanagawa, Midori Ueno, Rintaro Ito, Daiju Ueda, Tsukasa Saida, Ryo Kurokawa, Koji Takumi, Kentaro Nishioka, Shunsuke Sugawara, Satoru Ide, Maya Honda, Mami Iima, Mariko Kawamura, Akihiko Sakata, Keitaro Sofue, Seitaro Oda, Tadashi Watabe, Kenji Hirata, Shinji Naganawa","doi":"10.4274/dir.2025.253550","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4274/dir.2025.253550","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) is an emerging imaging technology that promises to overcome the limitations of conventional energy-integrating detector (EID)-CT, particularly in thoracic oncology. This narrative review summarizes technical advances and clinical applications of PCD-CT in the thorax with emphasis on spatial resolution, dose-image-quality balance, and intrinsic spectral imaging, and it outlines practical implications relevant to thoracic oncology. A literature review of PubMed through May 31, 2025, was conducted using combinations of \"photon counting,\" \"computed tomography,\" \"thoracic oncology,\" and \"artificial intelligence.\" We screened the retrieved records and included studies with direct relevance to lung and mediastinal tumors, image quality, radiation dose, spectral/iodine imaging, or artificial intelligence-based reconstruction; case reports, editorials, and animal-only or purely methodological reports were excluded. PCD-CT demonstrated superior spatial resolution compared with EID-CT, enabling clearer visualization of fine pulmonary structures, such as bronchioles and subsolid nodules; slice thicknesses of approximately 0.4 mm and <i>ex vivo</i> resolvable structures approaching 0.11 mm have been reported. Across intraindividual clinical comparisons, radiation-dose reductions of 16%-43% have been achieved while maintaining or improving diagnostic image quality. Intrinsic spectral imaging enables accurate iodine mapping and low-keV virtual monoenergetic images and has shown quantitative advantages versus dual-energy CT in phantoms and early clinical work. Artificial intelligence-based deep-learning reconstruction and super-resolution can complement detector capabilities to reduce noise and stabilize fine-structure depiction without increasing dose. Potential reductions in contrast volume are biologically plausible given improved low-keV contrast-to-noise ratio, although clinical dose-finding data remain limited, and routine K-edge imaging has not yet translated to clinical thoracic practice. In conclusion, PCD-CT provides higher spatial and spectral fidelity at lower or comparable doses, supporting earlier and more precise tumor detection and characterization; future work should prioritize outcome-oriented trials, protocol harmonization, and implementation studies aligned with \"Green Radiology\".</p>","PeriodicalId":11341,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and interventional radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145130364","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kadir Atakır, Kaan Işın, Abdullah Taş, Hakan Önder
<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) version 4 Omni (ChatGPT-4o) in radiology across seven information input combinations (image, clinical data, and multiple-choice options) to assess the consistency of its outputs across repeated trials and to compare its performance with that of human radiologists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We tested 129 distinct radiology cases under seven input conditions (varying presence of imaging, clinical context, and answer options). Each case was processed by ChatGPT-4o for seven different input combinations on three separate accounts. Diagnostic accuracy was determined by comparison with ground-truth diagnoses, and interobserver consistency was measured using Fleiss' kappa. Pairwise comparisons were performed with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Additionally, the same set of cases was evaluated by nine radiology residents to benchmark ChatGPT-4o's performance against human diagnostic accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ChatGPT-4o's diagnostic accuracy was lowest for "image only" (19.90%) and "options only" (20.67%) conditions. The highest accuracy was observed in "image + clinical information + options" (80.88%) and "clinical information + options" (75.45%) conditions. The highest interobserver agreement was observed in the "image + clinical information + options" condition (κ = 0.733) and the lowest was in the "options only" condition (κ = 0.023), suggesting that more information improves consistency. However, there was no effective benefit of adding imaging data over already provided clinical data and options, as seen in post-hoc analysis. In human comparison, ChatGPT-4o outperformed radiology residents in text-based configurations (75.45% vs. 42.89%), whereas residents showed slightly better performance in image-based tasks (64.13% vs. 61.24%). Notably, when residents were allowed to use ChatGPT-4o as a support tool, their image-based diagnostic accuracy increased from 63.04% to 74.16%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ChatGPT-4o performs well when provided with rich textual input but remains limited in purely image- based diagnoses. Its accuracy and consistency increase with multimodal input, yet adding imaging does not significantly improve performance beyond clinical context and diagnostic options alone. The model's superior performance to residents in text-based tasks underscores its potential as a diagnostic aid in structured scenarios. Furthermore, its integration as a support tool may enhance human diagnostic accuracy, particularly in image-based interpretation.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Although ChatGPT-4o is not yet capable of reliably interpreting radiologic images on its own, it demonstrates strong performance in text-based diagnostic reasoning. Its integration into clinical workflows-particularly for triage, structured decision support, or educational purposes-may augment ra
{"title":"Diagnostic accuracy and consistency of ChatGPT-4o in radiology: influence of image, clinical data, and answer options on performance.","authors":"Kadir Atakır, Kaan Işın, Abdullah Taş, Hakan Önder","doi":"10.4274/dir.2025.253460","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4274/dir.2025.253460","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) version 4 Omni (ChatGPT-4o) in radiology across seven information input combinations (image, clinical data, and multiple-choice options) to assess the consistency of its outputs across repeated trials and to compare its performance with that of human radiologists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We tested 129 distinct radiology cases under seven input conditions (varying presence of imaging, clinical context, and answer options). Each case was processed by ChatGPT-4o for seven different input combinations on three separate accounts. Diagnostic accuracy was determined by comparison with ground-truth diagnoses, and interobserver consistency was measured using Fleiss' kappa. Pairwise comparisons were performed with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Additionally, the same set of cases was evaluated by nine radiology residents to benchmark ChatGPT-4o's performance against human diagnostic accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ChatGPT-4o's diagnostic accuracy was lowest for \"image only\" (19.90%) and \"options only\" (20.67%) conditions. The highest accuracy was observed in \"image + clinical information + options\" (80.88%) and \"clinical information + options\" (75.45%) conditions. The highest interobserver agreement was observed in the \"image + clinical information + options\" condition (κ = 0.733) and the lowest was in the \"options only\" condition (κ = 0.023), suggesting that more information improves consistency. However, there was no effective benefit of adding imaging data over already provided clinical data and options, as seen in post-hoc analysis. In human comparison, ChatGPT-4o outperformed radiology residents in text-based configurations (75.45% vs. 42.89%), whereas residents showed slightly better performance in image-based tasks (64.13% vs. 61.24%). Notably, when residents were allowed to use ChatGPT-4o as a support tool, their image-based diagnostic accuracy increased from 63.04% to 74.16%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ChatGPT-4o performs well when provided with rich textual input but remains limited in purely image- based diagnoses. Its accuracy and consistency increase with multimodal input, yet adding imaging does not significantly improve performance beyond clinical context and diagnostic options alone. The model's superior performance to residents in text-based tasks underscores its potential as a diagnostic aid in structured scenarios. Furthermore, its integration as a support tool may enhance human diagnostic accuracy, particularly in image-based interpretation.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Although ChatGPT-4o is not yet capable of reliably interpreting radiologic images on its own, it demonstrates strong performance in text-based diagnostic reasoning. Its integration into clinical workflows-particularly for triage, structured decision support, or educational purposes-may augment ra","PeriodicalId":11341,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and interventional radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145112232","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Il Wan Son, Seung Baek Hong, Nam Kyung Lee, Suk Kim, Hyung Il Seo, Young Mok Park, Byeong Gwan Noh, Jong Hyun Lee
Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility of abbreviated liver magnetic resonance imaging (AMRI) with a second-shot arterial phase (SSAP) image for the viability of treated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after non-radiation locoregional therapy (LRT).
Methods: We retrospectively enrolled patients with non-radiation LRT for HCC who underwent the modified gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI protocol, which includes routine dynamic and SSAP imaging after the first and second injection of gadoxetic acid, respectively (6 mL and 4 mL, respectively), and an available reference standard for tumor viability in the treated HCC between March 2021 and February 2022. Two radiologists independently reviewed the full-protocol MRI (FP-MRI) and AMRI with SSAP. For the FP-MRI, observations were assigned using the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System treatment response (LR-TR) algorithm v.2024. In the AMRI with SSAP, the observations were assigned using the abbreviated LR-TR category according to the arterial mass-like enhancement in SSAP. Ancillary features, such as diffusion restriction and T2-weighted mild-to-moderate hyperintensity, were also optionally used.
Results: Of the 95 patients (70 men and 25 women; mean age, 68.7 years), 42 (44.2%) had viable lesions and 53 (55.8%) had non-viable lesions. The scan time of the simulated AMRI was significantly shorter than the FP-MRI (7.6±0.49 and 23.6±0.50 min, respectively; p<0.001). For evaluating the viability of treated HCC, there were no significant differences in the sensitivity and specificity between the FP-MRI and AMRI with SSAP (sensitivity, 85.7% vs. 80.1%, P = 0.500; specificity, 96.2% vs. 96.2%, P = 1.000).
Conclusion: The abbreviated LR-TR score in AMRI with SSAP showed non-inferior diagnostic performance to FP-MRI in terms of evaluating the viability for the treated HCC, which may be helpful in clinical practice alongside a decreased scan time.
Clinical significance: Abbreviated liver MRI with SSAP may be helpful for evaluating the viability of treated HCC in practice, while also providing a decreased scan time.
目的:评价短段肝磁共振成像(AMRI)与二次动脉期(SSAP)图像在非放射局部治疗(LRT)后肝细胞癌(HCC)治疗的可行性。方法:我们回顾性地纳入了接受改良的gadoxetic酸增强肝脏MRI方案的HCC非放射性LRT患者,该方案包括分别在第一次和第二次注射gadoxetic酸(分别为6 mL和4 mL)后的常规动态和SSAP成像,以及2021年3月至2022年2月期间治疗的HCC肿瘤存活率的可用参考标准。两名放射科医生独立审查了全方案MRI (FP-MRI)和AMRI与SSAP。对于FP-MRI,观察结果使用肝脏成像报告和数据系统治疗反应(LR-TR)算法v.2024进行分配。在伴有SSAP的AMRI中,根据SSAP的动脉肿块样增强,使用简化的LR-TR分类来分配观察结果。辅助特征,如扩散限制和t2加权轻度至中度高强度,也可选择使用。结果:95例患者(男性70例,女性25例,平均年龄68.7岁)中,42例(44.2%)有活病灶,53例(55.8%)无活病灶。模拟AMRI的扫描时间明显短于FP-MRI(分别为7.6±0.49和23.6±0.50 min; pP = 0.500;特异性为96.2% vs. 96.2%, P = 1.000)。结论:在评估治疗HCC的生存能力方面,AMRI与SSAP的缩短LR-TR评分的诊断性能不逊于FP-MRI,这可能有助于临床实践,同时减少扫描时间。临床意义:SSAP简化肝脏MRI在实践中可能有助于评估HCC治疗后的生存能力,同时也减少了扫描时间。
{"title":"Abbreviated liver magnetic resonance imaging with a second-shot arterial phase image to assess the viability of treated hepatocellular carcinoma after non-radiation locoregional therapy.","authors":"Il Wan Son, Seung Baek Hong, Nam Kyung Lee, Suk Kim, Hyung Il Seo, Young Mok Park, Byeong Gwan Noh, Jong Hyun Lee","doi":"10.4274/dir.2025.253482","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4274/dir.2025.253482","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility of abbreviated liver magnetic resonance imaging (AMRI) with a second-shot arterial phase (SSAP) image for the viability of treated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after non-radiation locoregional therapy (LRT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively enrolled patients with non-radiation LRT for HCC who underwent the modified gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI protocol, which includes routine dynamic and SSAP imaging after the first and second injection of gadoxetic acid, respectively (6 mL and 4 mL, respectively), and an available reference standard for tumor viability in the treated HCC between March 2021 and February 2022. Two radiologists independently reviewed the full-protocol MRI (FP-MRI) and AMRI with SSAP. For the FP-MRI, observations were assigned using the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System treatment response (LR-TR) algorithm v.2024. In the AMRI with SSAP, the observations were assigned using the abbreviated LR-TR category according to the arterial mass-like enhancement in SSAP. Ancillary features, such as diffusion restriction and T2-weighted mild-to-moderate hyperintensity, were also optionally used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 95 patients (70 men and 25 women; mean age, 68.7 years), 42 (44.2%) had viable lesions and 53 (55.8%) had non-viable lesions. The scan time of the simulated AMRI was significantly shorter than the FP-MRI (7.6±0.49 and 23.6±0.50 min, respectively; p<0.001). For evaluating the viability of treated HCC, there were no significant differences in the sensitivity and specificity between the FP-MRI and AMRI with SSAP (sensitivity, 85.7% vs. 80.1%, <i>P</i> = 0.500; specificity, 96.2% vs. 96.2%, <i>P</i> = 1.000).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The abbreviated LR-TR score in AMRI with SSAP showed non-inferior diagnostic performance to FP-MRI in terms of evaluating the viability for the treated HCC, which may be helpful in clinical practice alongside a decreased scan time.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Abbreviated liver MRI with SSAP may be helpful for evaluating the viability of treated HCC in practice, while also providing a decreased scan time.</p>","PeriodicalId":11341,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and interventional radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145033030","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-08Epub Date: 2025-03-26DOI: 10.4274/dir.2025.243095
Mecit Kantarcı, Volkan Kızılgöz, Ramazan Terzi, Ahmet Enes Kılıç, Halime Kabalcı, Önder Durmaz, Nil Tokgöz, Mustafa Harman, Ayşegül Sağır Kahraman, Ali Avanaz, Sonay Aydın, Gülsüm Özlem Elpek, Merve Yazol, Bülent Aydınlı
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of artificial intelligence (AI) in diagnosing focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) of the liver using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and compare its performance with that of radiologists.
Methods: In the first phase of the study, the MRIs of 60 patients (30 patients with FNH and 30 patients with no lesions or lesions other than FNH) were processed using a segmentation program and introduced to an AI model. After the learning process, the MRIs of 42 different patients that the AI model had no experience with were introduced to the system. In addition, a radiology resident and a radiology specialist evaluated patients with the same MR sequences. The sensitivity and specificity values were obtained from all three reviews.
Results: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the AI model were found to be 0.769, 0.966, 0.909, and 0.903, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity values were higher than those of the radiology resident and lower than those of the radiology specialist. The results of the specialist versus the AI model revealed a good agreement level, with a kappa (κ) value of 0.777.
Conclusion: For the diagnosis of FNH, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the AI device were higher than those of the radiology resident and lower than those of the radiology specialist. With additional studies focused on different specific lesions of the liver, AI models are expected to be able to diagnose each liver lesion with high accuracy in the future.
Clinical significance: AI is studied to provide assisted or automated interpretation of radiological images with an accurate and reproducible imaging diagnosis.
{"title":"Evaluating artificial intelligence for a focal nodular hyperplasia diagnosis using magnetic resonance imaging: preliminary findings.","authors":"Mecit Kantarcı, Volkan Kızılgöz, Ramazan Terzi, Ahmet Enes Kılıç, Halime Kabalcı, Önder Durmaz, Nil Tokgöz, Mustafa Harman, Ayşegül Sağır Kahraman, Ali Avanaz, Sonay Aydın, Gülsüm Özlem Elpek, Merve Yazol, Bülent Aydınlı","doi":"10.4274/dir.2025.243095","DOIUrl":"10.4274/dir.2025.243095","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of artificial intelligence (AI) in diagnosing focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) of the liver using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and compare its performance with that of radiologists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the first phase of the study, the MRIs of 60 patients (30 patients with FNH and 30 patients with no lesions or lesions other than FNH) were processed using a segmentation program and introduced to an AI model. After the learning process, the MRIs of 42 different patients that the AI model had no experience with were introduced to the system. In addition, a radiology resident and a radiology specialist evaluated patients with the same MR sequences. The sensitivity and specificity values were obtained from all three reviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the AI model were found to be 0.769, 0.966, 0.909, and 0.903, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity values were higher than those of the radiology resident and lower than those of the radiology specialist. The results of the specialist versus the AI model revealed a good agreement level, with a kappa (κ) value of 0.777.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For the diagnosis of FNH, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the AI device were higher than those of the radiology resident and lower than those of the radiology specialist. With additional studies focused on different specific lesions of the liver, AI models are expected to be able to diagnose each liver lesion with high accuracy in the future.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>AI is studied to provide assisted or automated interpretation of radiological images with an accurate and reproducible imaging diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":11341,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and interventional radiology","volume":" ","pages":"405-415"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12417915/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143709181","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-08Epub Date: 2024-09-09DOI: 10.4274/dir.2024.242833
Cemal Aydın Gündoğmuş, Hande Özen Atalay, Vugar Samadli, Levent Oğuzkurt
Purpose: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is increasingly prevalent, particularly among the aging population. Retrograde tibiopedal access (RTPA) has emerged as a useful endovascular treatment for PAD. However, there is limited research examining factors that influence the efficacy of RTPA. To investigate factors affecting the access, crossing, and recanalization success rates of RTPA for infrapopliteal PAD treatment.
Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 720 patients who underwent endovascular treatment for PAD. Of these, 104 patients (mean age: 65.5 ± 16.2; 89 men) with 131 RTPA trials were included in the final evaluation. The disease and its duration, Rutherford score, smoking status, access site, and its occlusion status, access, crossing, and recanalization success were noted. Data were analyzed using Pearson's chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests and multivariate logistic regression to evaluate the impact of various factors on success rates.
Results: The access success rate was 82.6%, the crossing success rate was 95.4%, and the recanalization success rate was 74%. Access success was significantly higher when the dorsal pedal artery (DPA) was the access artery compared with the posterior tibial artery (91.3% vs. 74.2%, P = 0.009). Access success was notably lower in patients with thromboangiitis obliterans compared with patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and non-DM atherosclerosis (68.6% vs. 90.3% and 80.3%, P = 0.019). Recanalization success was higher when the puncture site was non-occluded (76.7% vs. 53.5%, P = 0.023).
Conclusion: The study suggests that RTPA is a generally effective and safe technique for infrapopliteal PAD treatment. The most favorable outcomes are observed in individuals with DM who have a non-occluded DPA at the puncture site. Recanalization success is only affected by the patency of the artery at the puncture site.
Clinical significance: These findings offer targeted guidance for clinicians and highlight areas requiring further investigation.
目的:外周动脉疾病(PAD)越来越普遍,尤其是在老龄人口中。胫骨后入路(RTPA)已成为治疗 PAD 的一种有效的血管内治疗方法。然而,目前对影响 RTPA 疗效因素的研究还很有限。目的:研究影响 RTPA 治疗胫骨下 PAD 的入路、交叉和再闭塞成功率的因素:方法:对 720 名接受血管内治疗的 PAD 患者进行了回顾性研究。其中,104 名患者(平均年龄:65.5 ± 16.2;89 名男性)接受了 131 次 RTPA 试验,并纳入最终评估。研究人员注意到了患者的疾病及其持续时间、卢瑟福评分、吸烟状况、通路部位及其闭塞状况、通路、交叉和再通路的成功率。采用皮尔逊卡方检验、曼-惠特尼U检验和多变量逻辑回归分析数据,以评估各种因素对成功率的影响:入路成功率为 82.6%,穿刺成功率为 95.4%,再狭窄成功率为 74%。与胫后动脉相比,以足背动脉(DPA)为入路动脉的入路成功率明显更高(91.3% 对 74.2%,P = 0.009)。与糖尿病(DM)和非糖尿病动脉粥样硬化患者相比,血栓闭塞性脉管炎患者的入路成功率明显较低(68.6% 对 90.3% 和 80.3%,P = 0.019)。穿刺部位未闭塞时,再通成功率更高(76.7% vs. 53.5%,P = 0.023):研究表明,RTPA 是治疗腘窝下 PAD 的一种普遍有效且安全的技术。研究结果表明,RTPA 是治疗腘下动脉供血不足的一种普遍有效且安全的技术。患有糖尿病且穿刺部位的 DPA 未闭塞者的疗效最佳。再通成功率仅受穿刺部位动脉是否通畅的影响:这些发现为临床医生提供了有针对性的指导,并强调了需要进一步研究的领域。
{"title":"Factors effecting the success of retrograde tibiopedal access and recanalization in infrapopliteal artery occlusions.","authors":"Cemal Aydın Gündoğmuş, Hande Özen Atalay, Vugar Samadli, Levent Oğuzkurt","doi":"10.4274/dir.2024.242833","DOIUrl":"10.4274/dir.2024.242833","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is increasingly prevalent, particularly among the aging population. Retrograde tibiopedal access (RTPA) has emerged as a useful endovascular treatment for PAD. However, there is limited research examining factors that influence the efficacy of RTPA. To investigate factors affecting the access, crossing, and recanalization success rates of RTPA for infrapopliteal PAD treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted on 720 patients who underwent endovascular treatment for PAD. Of these, 104 patients (mean age: 65.5 ± 16.2; 89 men) with 131 RTPA trials were included in the final evaluation. The disease and its duration, Rutherford score, smoking status, access site, and its occlusion status, access, crossing, and recanalization success were noted. Data were analyzed using Pearson's chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests and multivariate logistic regression to evaluate the impact of various factors on success rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The access success rate was 82.6%, the crossing success rate was 95.4%, and the recanalization success rate was 74%. Access success was significantly higher when the dorsal pedal artery (DPA) was the access artery compared with the posterior tibial artery (91.3% vs. 74.2%, <i>P</i> = 0.009). Access success was notably lower in patients with thromboangiitis obliterans compared with patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and non-DM atherosclerosis (68.6% vs. 90.3% and 80.3%, <i>P</i> = 0.019). Recanalization success was higher when the puncture site was non-occluded (76.7% vs. 53.5%, <i>P</i> = 0.023).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study suggests that RTPA is a generally effective and safe technique for infrapopliteal PAD treatment. The most favorable outcomes are observed in individuals with DM who have a non-occluded DPA at the puncture site. Recanalization success is only affected by the patency of the artery at the puncture site.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>These findings offer targeted guidance for clinicians and highlight areas requiring further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11341,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and interventional radiology","volume":" ","pages":"482-488"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12417898/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142153441","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-08Epub Date: 2024-12-30DOI: 10.4274/dir.2024.242946
Celal Cinar, Erol Akgul, Alperen Elek, Mahmut Kusbeci, Egemen Ozturk, Hasan Bilen Onan, Irem Islek, Mohammad Naim Forogh, Mohammad Nawas Nasiri, Ismail Oran
Purpose: This study aims to investigate the indications and therapeutic efficacy of flow-diverting stents (FDSs) in the management of extracranial carotid artery aneurysms (ECAAs) and dissections.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 18 patients treated for ECAAs with an FDS between 2010 and 2024. Patient demographics, aneurysm characteristics, procedural details, and clinical and radiologic follow-up outcomes were extracted from medical records. Procedures were performed under general anesthesia using standard endovascular techniques. Patients received preoperative and postoperative antiplatelet therapy and were fully anticoagulated during the procedure. Follow- up assessments included digital subtraction angiography or computed tomography angiography at 6-12 months and clinical evaluations to monitor symptom resolution and complications.
Results: Eighteen patients, with an average age of 46.44 ± 17.54 years, underwent 19 endovascular interventions. Technical success was achieved in all cases. Single stent deployment was used in 15 aneurysms, and telescopic stent deployment in 7. Total occlusion of the aneurysm was achieved in 94.4% of cases. One patient required retreatment due to the separation of two overlapped telescopic stents. All patients were discharged within 2 days post-procedure, with symptomatic patients experiencing the complete resolution of symptoms. No complications or adverse events were reported during the follow-up period.
Conclusion: The endovascular treatment of ECAAs with FDSs appears to be a safe and effective alternative, achieving high technical success and positive clinical outcomes.
Clinical significance: The use of FDSs for treating ECAAs significantly improves patient outcomes with minimal complications.
{"title":"Flow-diverting stents in the management of extracranial carotid artery aneurysms.","authors":"Celal Cinar, Erol Akgul, Alperen Elek, Mahmut Kusbeci, Egemen Ozturk, Hasan Bilen Onan, Irem Islek, Mohammad Naim Forogh, Mohammad Nawas Nasiri, Ismail Oran","doi":"10.4274/dir.2024.242946","DOIUrl":"10.4274/dir.2024.242946","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to investigate the indications and therapeutic efficacy of flow-diverting stents (FDSs) in the management of extracranial carotid artery aneurysms (ECAAs) and dissections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 18 patients treated for ECAAs with an FDS between 2010 and 2024. Patient demographics, aneurysm characteristics, procedural details, and clinical and radiologic follow-up outcomes were extracted from medical records. Procedures were performed under general anesthesia using standard endovascular techniques. Patients received preoperative and postoperative antiplatelet therapy and were fully anticoagulated during the procedure. Follow- up assessments included digital subtraction angiography or computed tomography angiography at 6-12 months and clinical evaluations to monitor symptom resolution and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen patients, with an average age of 46.44 ± 17.54 years, underwent 19 endovascular interventions. Technical success was achieved in all cases. Single stent deployment was used in 15 aneurysms, and telescopic stent deployment in 7. Total occlusion of the aneurysm was achieved in 94.4% of cases. One patient required retreatment due to the separation of two overlapped telescopic stents. All patients were discharged within 2 days post-procedure, with symptomatic patients experiencing the complete resolution of symptoms. No complications or adverse events were reported during the follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The endovascular treatment of ECAAs with FDSs appears to be a safe and effective alternative, achieving high technical success and positive clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>The use of FDSs for treating ECAAs significantly improves patient outcomes with minimal complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":11341,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and interventional radiology","volume":" ","pages":"489-495"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12417920/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142902447","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-08Epub Date: 2025-07-21DOI: 10.4274/dir.2025.242880
Yarong Lin, Wenrong Zhu, Qingqiang Zhu
Purpose: To quantitatively compare the diagnostic values of conventional diffusion-weighted imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) in differentiating clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and renal angiomyolipoma with minimal fat (RAMF).
Methods: Sixty-eight patients with ccRCC and 18 patients with RAMF were retrospectively studied. For DKI and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), respiratory-triggered echo-planar imaging sequences were acquired in the axial plane (three b-values: 0, 1000, 2000 s/mm2; one b-value: 2000 s/mm2). Mean diffusivity (MD), fractional anisotropy (FA), mean kurtosis (MK), kurtosis anisotropy (KA), radial kurtosis (RK), and ADC were evaluated. The diagnostic efficacy of various diffusion parameters in predicting ccRCC and RAMF was compared.
Results: The ADC and MD values of ccRCCs were higher than those of RAMFs (P < 0.05), whereas comparable FA, MK, and KA values were observed between ccRCCs and RAMFs (P > 0.05). Moreover, the RK values of RAMFs were higher than those of ccRCCs (P < 0.05). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses showed that MD values had the highest diagnostic efficacy in differentiating ccRCCs from RAMFs. In pairwise comparisons of ROC curves and diagnostic efficacy, DKI parameters demonstrated better diagnostic accuracy than ADC in differentiating between ccRCCs and RAMFs (P < 0.05).
Conclusion: DKI analysis demonstrates superior performance than ADC analysis in differentiating ccRCC and RAMF.
Clinical significance: DKI technology may serve as an additional non-invasive biomarker for the differential diagnosis of renal tumor types.
{"title":"Diffusion kurtosis versus diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating clear cell renal cell carcinoma and renal angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: a comparative study.","authors":"Yarong Lin, Wenrong Zhu, Qingqiang Zhu","doi":"10.4274/dir.2025.242880","DOIUrl":"10.4274/dir.2025.242880","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To quantitatively compare the diagnostic values of conventional diffusion-weighted imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) in differentiating clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and renal angiomyolipoma with minimal fat (RAMF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-eight patients with ccRCC and 18 patients with RAMF were retrospectively studied. For DKI and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), respiratory-triggered echo-planar imaging sequences were acquired in the axial plane (three <i>b</i>-values: 0, 1000, 2000 s/mm<sup>2</sup>; one <i>b</i>-value: 2000 s/mm<sup>2</sup>). Mean diffusivity (MD), fractional anisotropy (FA), mean kurtosis (MK), kurtosis anisotropy (KA), radial kurtosis (RK), and ADC were evaluated. The diagnostic efficacy of various diffusion parameters in predicting ccRCC and RAMF was compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ADC and MD values of ccRCCs were higher than those of RAMFs (<i>P</i> < 0.05), whereas comparable FA, MK, and KA values were observed between ccRCCs and RAMFs (<i>P</i> > 0.05). Moreover, the RK values of RAMFs were higher than those of ccRCCs (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses showed that MD values had the highest diagnostic efficacy in differentiating ccRCCs from RAMFs. In pairwise comparisons of ROC curves and diagnostic efficacy, DKI parameters demonstrated better diagnostic accuracy than ADC in differentiating between ccRCCs and RAMFs (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DKI analysis demonstrates superior performance than ADC analysis in differentiating ccRCC and RAMF.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>DKI technology may serve as an additional non-invasive biomarker for the differential diagnosis of renal tumor types.</p>","PeriodicalId":11341,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and interventional radiology","volume":" ","pages":"416-422"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12417911/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144674146","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Radiography is a field of medicine inherently intertwined with technology. The dependency on technology is very high for obtaining images in ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Although the reduction in radiation dose is not applicable in US and MRI, advancements in technology have made it possible in CT, with ongoing studies aimed at further optimization. The resolution and diagnostic quality of images obtained through advancements in each modality are steadily improving. Additionally, technological progress has significantly shortened acquisition times for CT and MRI. The use of artificial intelligence (AI), which is becoming increasingly widespread worldwide, has also been incorporated into radiography. This technology can produce more accurate and reproducible results in US examinations. Machine learning offers great potential for improving image quality, creating more distinct and useful images, and even developing new US imaging modalities. Furthermore, AI technologies are increasingly prevalent in CT and MRI for image evaluation, image generation, and enhanced image quality.
{"title":"New imaging techniques and trends in radiology.","authors":"Mecit Kantarcı, Sonay Aydın, Hayri Oğul, Volkan Kızılgöz","doi":"10.4274/dir.2024.242926","DOIUrl":"10.4274/dir.2024.242926","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Radiography is a field of medicine inherently intertwined with technology. The dependency on technology is very high for obtaining images in ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Although the reduction in radiation dose is not applicable in US and MRI, advancements in technology have made it possible in CT, with ongoing studies aimed at further optimization. The resolution and diagnostic quality of images obtained through advancements in each modality are steadily improving. Additionally, technological progress has significantly shortened acquisition times for CT and MRI. The use of artificial intelligence (AI), which is becoming increasingly widespread worldwide, has also been incorporated into radiography. This technology can produce more accurate and reproducible results in US examinations. Machine learning offers great potential for improving image quality, creating more distinct and useful images, and even developing new US imaging modalities. Furthermore, AI technologies are increasingly prevalent in CT and MRI for image evaluation, image generation, and enhanced image quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":11341,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and interventional radiology","volume":" ","pages":"505-517"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12417918/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143001886","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}