Background: Antibiotics are drugs of natural or synthetic origin used to treat various infections. The practice of excessive and inappropriate antibiotics use is the main global cause of bacterial resistance, which is one of the most serious global public health threats. It is estimated that about 50% of global antibiotic prescriptions are inappropriate. This study assesses the prevalence and pattern of inappropriate prescriptions of antibiotics amongst ambulatory care visits in Ethiopia.
Methods: A facility-based, cross-sectional study with a quantitative approach was conducted amongst randomly selected prescriptions issued for outpatients from May to June 2022 at Debre Markos Specialized Comprehensive Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia. Descriptive statistics, such as frequencies and percentages, were computed. For group comparisons, χ2 and independent sample t-tests were computed. The statistical significance of the association was considered at p<0.05.
Results: A total of 2640 antibiotics were prescribed for patients in the outpatient setting with various bacterial infections via 911 prescriptions, of which 49.5% were non-compliant with the national treatment guideline. Guideline non-compliant prescriptions increased remarkably amongst patients in the outpatient setting diagnosed with community-acquired pneumonia (38.8% versus 30.1%; p=0.006) and peptic ulcer disease (14.9% versus 9%; p=0.006). Moreover, inappropriate prescription was significantly higher amongst patients taking amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (33.2% versus 48.2%; p<0.001) and cephalexin (17.8% versus 24.3%; p=0.016).
Conclusion: Large proportions of antibiotic prescriptions for outpatients were non-compliant with the national treatment guideline, suggesting that prescribers need to give special attention to outpatients whilst ordering antibiotics such as amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and cephalexin. Antibiotic stewardship efforts to optimize outpatient antibiotic prescriptions and reduce the use of potentially inappropriate antibiotics are needed in Ethiopia.
{"title":"Antibiotic appropriateness at outpatient settings in Ethiopia: the need for an antibiotic stewardship programme.","authors":"Rahel Belete Abebe, Bezawit Mulat Ayal, Muluken Adela Alemu, Tirsit Ketsela Zeleke","doi":"10.7573/dic.2023-12-2","DOIUrl":"10.7573/dic.2023-12-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antibiotics are drugs of natural or synthetic origin used to treat various infections. The practice of excessive and inappropriate antibiotics use is the main global cause of bacterial resistance, which is one of the most serious global public health threats. It is estimated that about 50% of global antibiotic prescriptions are inappropriate. This study assesses the prevalence and pattern of inappropriate prescriptions of antibiotics amongst ambulatory care visits in Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A facility-based, cross-sectional study with a quantitative approach was conducted amongst randomly selected prescriptions issued for outpatients from May to June 2022 at Debre Markos Specialized Comprehensive Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia. Descriptive statistics, such as frequencies and percentages, were computed. For group comparisons, χ<sup>2</sup> and independent sample <i>t</i>-tests were computed. The statistical significance of the association was considered at <i>p</i><0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2640 antibiotics were prescribed for patients in the outpatient setting with various bacterial infections via 911 prescriptions, of which 49.5% were non-compliant with the national treatment guideline. Guideline non-compliant prescriptions increased remarkably amongst patients in the outpatient setting diagnosed with community-acquired pneumonia (38.8% <i>versus</i> 30.1%; <i>p</i>=0.006) and peptic ulcer disease (14.9% <i>versus</i> 9%; <i>p</i>=0.006). Moreover, inappropriate prescription was significantly higher amongst patients taking amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (33.2% <i>versus</i> 48.2%; <i>p</i><0.001) and cephalexin (17.8% <i>versus</i> 24.3%; <i>p</i>=0.016).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Large proportions of antibiotic prescriptions for outpatients were non-compliant with the national treatment guideline, suggesting that prescribers need to give special attention to outpatients whilst ordering antibiotics such as amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and cephalexin. Antibiotic stewardship efforts to optimize outpatient antibiotic prescriptions and reduce the use of potentially inappropriate antibiotics are needed in Ethiopia.</p>","PeriodicalId":11362,"journal":{"name":"Drugs in Context","volume":"13 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11090269/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140916231","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-01eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.7573/dic.2024-2-3
Giorgio Walter Canonica, Piotr Kuna, Marcus Maurer, Ralph Mösges, Zoltan Novak, Nikolaus Papadopoulos, Pablo Rodriguez Del Rio
Background: Second-generation oral H1-antihistamines, including bilastine, represent the emerging treatments of allergic rhinitis (including rhinoconjunctivitis) and chronic urticaria in both adults and children. This study analyses available evidence supporting the use of bilastine amongst second-generation antihistamines for the symptomatic treatment of allergic rhinitis and urticaria in adults and children.
Methods: Consensus amongst experts from 17 countries on the ideal treatment of rhinitis and urticaria, and the specific role of bilastine was measured by means of a modified Delphi process. A total of 12 statements were voted on by the experts using a five-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree; 2 = disagree; 3 = undecided; 4 = agree; 5 = strongly agree). The definition of consensus was set at a minimum of 80% concordance for 4+5 scores (agree or strongly agree).
Results: All proposed statements reached consensus, with a concordance of ≥98% for five statements and ≥96% for seven.
Conclusions: The wide consensus obtained for the proposed statements suggests a prominent role for bilastine in the management of allergic rhinitis and urticaria.
{"title":"Bilastine for the treatment of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and urticaria: results from an international Delphi study.","authors":"Giorgio Walter Canonica, Piotr Kuna, Marcus Maurer, Ralph Mösges, Zoltan Novak, Nikolaus Papadopoulos, Pablo Rodriguez Del Rio","doi":"10.7573/dic.2024-2-3","DOIUrl":"10.7573/dic.2024-2-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Second-generation oral H<sub>1</sub>-antihistamines, including bilastine, represent the emerging treatments of allergic rhinitis (including rhinoconjunctivitis) and chronic urticaria in both adults and children. This study analyses available evidence supporting the use of bilastine amongst second-generation antihistamines for the symptomatic treatment of allergic rhinitis and urticaria in adults and children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consensus amongst experts from 17 countries on the ideal treatment of rhinitis and urticaria, and the specific role of bilastine was measured by means of a modified Delphi process. A total of 12 statements were voted on by the experts using a five-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree; 2 = disagree; 3 = undecided; 4 = agree; 5 = strongly agree). The definition of consensus was set at a minimum of 80% concordance for 4+5 scores (agree or strongly agree).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All proposed statements reached consensus, with a concordance of ≥98% for five statements and ≥96% for seven.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The wide consensus obtained for the proposed statements suggests a prominent role for bilastine in the management of allergic rhinitis and urticaria.</p>","PeriodicalId":11362,"journal":{"name":"Drugs in Context","volume":"13 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11090268/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140916236","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-29eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.7573/dic.2023-11-6
David Gómez-Ulloa, M Chris Runken, Wilton I Rodriguez, Basilio Hernández, Montserrat Chivite, E Anne Davis, Paul Nisbet
Background: As research continues towards improved treatments for Alzheimer disease (AD), there is growing interest in the views and needs from patients and caregivers on AD treatments.
Methods: In this study, we surveyed patients with AD and caregivers to determine the treatment goals that are most important to them. Patients with AD and caregivers were independently recruited in Europe and North America to complete a web-based survey. Eligible participants were ≥18 years old and diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment or mild-to-moderate AD (patient-reported group) or persons involved in the care of patients with AD (caregiver-reported group). A total of 322 patients and 614 caregivers completed the survey.
Results: The demographic characteristics of patients in the patient-reported and the caregiver-reported groups were similar. Disease severity of patients was greater in the caregiver-reported group compared with the patient-reported group (72.1% versus 46.9% moderate AD). The most important goal of AD treatment in both groups was maintenance of quality of life (QoL) (patient-reported group 31.1% and caregiver-reported group 38.8%; p=0.01). This was consistent across disease stages or symptom severity except for patients with mild cognitive impairment in the caregiver-reported group where slowing the progression of memory loss was the most important treatment goal.
Conclusions: Patient QoL was consistently the most relevant treatment goal for patients with AD and caregivers. In AD clinical trials, patient-relevant outcomes, for example, QoL, should be given high priority to reflect the needs and demands of patients with AD and their caregivers.A preliminary report of this work was presented at the 14th Clinical Trials on Alzheimer's Disease meeting (November 9-12, 2021).
{"title":"Understanding treatment goals and their application in clinical trial design for patients with Alzheimer disease and caregivers.","authors":"David Gómez-Ulloa, M Chris Runken, Wilton I Rodriguez, Basilio Hernández, Montserrat Chivite, E Anne Davis, Paul Nisbet","doi":"10.7573/dic.2023-11-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7573/dic.2023-11-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As research continues towards improved treatments for Alzheimer disease (AD), there is growing interest in the views and needs from patients and caregivers on AD treatments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, we surveyed patients with AD and caregivers to determine the treatment goals that are most important to them. Patients with AD and caregivers were independently recruited in Europe and North America to complete a web-based survey. Eligible participants were ≥18 years old and diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment or mild-to-moderate AD (patient-reported group) or persons involved in the care of patients with AD (caregiver-reported group). A total of 322 patients and 614 caregivers completed the survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The demographic characteristics of patients in the patient-reported and the caregiver-reported groups were similar. Disease severity of patients was greater in the caregiver-reported group compared with the patient-reported group (72.1% <i>versus</i> 46.9% moderate AD). The most important goal of AD treatment in both groups was maintenance of quality of life (QoL) (patient-reported group 31.1% and caregiver-reported group 38.8%; <i>p</i>=0.01). This was consistent across disease stages or symptom severity except for patients with mild cognitive impairment in the caregiver-reported group where slowing the progression of memory loss was the most important treatment goal.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patient QoL was consistently the most relevant treatment goal for patients with AD and caregivers. In AD clinical trials, patient-relevant outcomes, for example, QoL, should be given high priority to reflect the needs and demands of patients with AD and their caregivers.A preliminary report of this work was presented at the 14th Clinical Trials on Alzheimer's Disease meeting (November 9-12, 2021).</p>","PeriodicalId":11362,"journal":{"name":"Drugs in Context","volume":"13 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11065135/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140853984","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) were brought into the market with the intent of providing benefits primarily to patients and physicians. Nevertheless, despite their multiple advantages, they have their own set of drawbacks, especially regarding irrational FDCs. If physicians continue to prescribe them, prohibiting their sale would become all the more challenging. This cross-sectional survey study was planned to comprehend the level of knowledge, attitude and practice of physicians regarding such FDCs at a tertiary care teaching institute of western Uttar Pradesh, India.
Methodology: A pre-validated questionnaire was communicated electronically to all the attending physicians. For data analysis, descriptive statistics were applied and a χ2 test was performed for inter-group comparison.
Results: Amongst the 108 respondents, participation was almost comparable from both medical and surgical branches, with most participants being junior residents (58%). Even with sound knowledge of FDCs, only 46.30% of them were aware of banned FDCs. Similarly, only 6.48% could correctly identify the disadvantages associated with the use of FDCs, and 33.18% could correctly recognize irrational FDCs. This finding was consistently reflected in their attitude and practice and only 15.74% of respondents cross-referenced FDCs with the available literature. Furthermore, despite 88.89% of respondents checking for rationality of FDCs before prescribing them, a compendium of irrational FDCs is routinely prescribed.
Conclusion: To amend these shortcomings in prescribing of irrational FDCs, some recommendations are proposed by the authors herein.
{"title":"Assessment of knowledge, attitude and practice of fixed-dose combinations amongst attending physicians and residents: a cross-sectional evaluation.","authors":"Dhyuti Gupta, Prithpal Singh Matreja, Shilpa Patrick, Meenu Thomas, Pooja Agarwal, Preeti Singh","doi":"10.7573/dic.2024-2-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7573/dic.2024-2-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) were brought into the market with the intent of providing benefits primarily to patients and physicians. Nevertheless, despite their multiple advantages, they have their own set of drawbacks, especially regarding irrational FDCs. If physicians continue to prescribe them, prohibiting their sale would become all the more challenging. This cross-sectional survey study was planned to comprehend the level of knowledge, attitude and practice of physicians regarding such FDCs at a tertiary care teaching institute of western Uttar Pradesh, India.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A pre-validated questionnaire was communicated electronically to all the attending physicians. For data analysis, descriptive statistics were applied and a χ<sup>2</sup> test was performed for inter-group comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Amongst the 108 respondents, participation was almost comparable from both medical and surgical branches, with most participants being junior residents (58%). Even with sound knowledge of FDCs, only 46.30% of them were aware of banned FDCs. Similarly, only 6.48% could correctly identify the disadvantages associated with the use of FDCs, and 33.18% could correctly recognize irrational FDCs. This finding was consistently reflected in their attitude and practice and only 15.74% of respondents cross-referenced FDCs with the available literature. Furthermore, despite 88.89% of respondents checking for rationality of FDCs before prescribing them, a compendium of irrational FDCs is routinely prescribed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To amend these shortcomings in prescribing of irrational FDCs, some recommendations are proposed by the authors herein.</p>","PeriodicalId":11362,"journal":{"name":"Drugs in Context","volume":"13 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11065134/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140860340","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-18eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.7573/dic.2023-12-5
Tiago Torres, Paulo Varela, Pedro Mendes Bastos, Sofia Magina, Martinha Henrique, Paulo Ferreira
Background: Real-world evidence plays a pivotal role in validating the efficacy of biologic drugs beyond the controlled environment of randomized trials. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of tildrakizumab in treating moderate-to-severe psoriasis within a real-world setting over a 52-week period in Portugal.
Methods: This multicentric, prospective, observational study included adult patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. All participants received tildrakizumab 100 mg at weeks 0 and 4, followed by a maintenance dose every 12 weeks, and were monitored for 52 weeks. Primary endpoints were determined based on Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) assessments at baseline, 16 (±2) weeks, 28 (±2) weeks and 52 (±2) weeks.
Results: A total of 54 patients were enrolled in the study (56% men, mean age of 50.3 ± 14.4 years). Half of the sample (n=27) had no prior experience with biologic treatments. About 74% of patients (n=40) presented at least one comorbidity during the study, with psoriatic arthritis being the most prevalent (29.6%). By week 52, there was a significant decrease in the mean PASI from 17.8±10.3 at baseline to 1.3±1.9 (p<0.001), indicating an overall improvement of 93%. By week 52, more than 85% of patients attained PASI ≤5, more than 80% reached PASI ≤3, and nearly 60% achieved PASI ≤1. Infections were observed in 9.3% of patients, and one patient required hospitalization (1.9%). The cumulative proportion of patients continuing treatment at 52 weeks was 88.9%.
Conclusions: This study demonstrates that tildrakizumab is an effective and safe agent for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis in a diverse, real-world setting.
{"title":"Tildrakizumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis: a 52-week, real-world Portuguese multicentric study.","authors":"Tiago Torres, Paulo Varela, Pedro Mendes Bastos, Sofia Magina, Martinha Henrique, Paulo Ferreira","doi":"10.7573/dic.2023-12-5","DOIUrl":"10.7573/dic.2023-12-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Real-world evidence plays a pivotal role in validating the efficacy of biologic drugs beyond the controlled environment of randomized trials. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of tildrakizumab in treating moderate-to-severe psoriasis within a real-world setting over a 52-week period in Portugal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicentric, prospective, observational study included adult patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. All participants received tildrakizumab 100 mg at weeks 0 and 4, followed by a maintenance dose every 12 weeks, and were monitored for 52 weeks. Primary endpoints were determined based on Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) assessments at baseline, 16 (±2) weeks, 28 (±2) weeks and 52 (±2) weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 54 patients were enrolled in the study (56% men, mean age of 50.3 ± 14.4 years). Half of the sample (<i>n</i>=27) had no prior experience with biologic treatments. About 74% of patients (<i>n</i>=40) presented at least one comorbidity during the study, with psoriatic arthritis being the most prevalent (29.6%). By week 52, there was a significant decrease in the mean PASI from 17.8±10.3 at baseline to 1.3±1.9 (<i>p</i><0.001), indicating an overall improvement of 93%. By week 52, more than 85% of patients attained PASI ≤5, more than 80% reached PASI ≤3, and nearly 60% achieved PASI ≤1. Infections were observed in 9.3% of patients, and one patient required hospitalization (1.9%). The cumulative proportion of patients continuing treatment at 52 weeks was 88.9%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates that tildrakizumab is an effective and safe agent for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis in a diverse, real-world setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":11362,"journal":{"name":"Drugs in Context","volume":"13 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10954292/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140178665","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-14eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.7573/dic.2023-11-2
Emanuele Grassedonio, Lorena Incorvaia, Marco Guarneri, Fabio Guagnini, Massimo Midiri
Post-contrast acute kidney injury is defined as a nephropathy with an increase in serum creatinine of >0.3 mg/dL (or >26.5 μmol/L) or >1.5-times the baseline within 48-72 h of intravascular administration of a contrast medium. Patients with cancer have an increased risk of post-contrast acute kidney injury not only related to the frequent use of contrast medium for computed tomography scans but also to other factors, including the type of tumour, age, oncological therapies, use of other nephrotoxic agents and dehydration. Preventive strategies were developed and may be applied to different risk profiles. Patients at risk may be detected by recently published risk scores.
{"title":"Prevention of post-contrast kidney injury in patients with cancer.","authors":"Emanuele Grassedonio, Lorena Incorvaia, Marco Guarneri, Fabio Guagnini, Massimo Midiri","doi":"10.7573/dic.2023-11-2","DOIUrl":"10.7573/dic.2023-11-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Post-contrast acute kidney injury is defined as a nephropathy with an increase in serum creatinine of >0.3 mg/dL (or >26.5 μmol/L) or >1.5-times the baseline within 48-72 h of intravascular administration of a contrast medium. Patients with cancer have an increased risk of post-contrast acute kidney injury not only related to the frequent use of contrast medium for computed tomography scans but also to other factors, including the type of tumour, age, oncological therapies, use of other nephrotoxic agents and dehydration. Preventive strategies were developed and may be applied to different risk profiles. Patients at risk may be detected by recently published risk scores.</p>","PeriodicalId":11362,"journal":{"name":"Drugs in Context","volume":"13 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10954291/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140179388","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-12eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.7573/dic.2023-9-4
Bernardo Rossini, Nicola Cecchi, Felice Clemente, Maria Rosaria De Paolis, Stefan Hohaus, Vanessa Innao, Mariano Lucignano, Roberto Massaiu, Giovanna Palumbo, Gian Matteo Rigolin, Francesca Gaia Rossi, Luisa Verga, Attilio Guarini
Castleman disease (CD) is a group of lymphoproliferative disorders that share common histopathological features yet have widely different aetiologies, clinical features and grades of severity as well as treatments and outcomes. Siltuximab is currently the only therapy approved by the FDA and EMA for idiopathic multicentric CD and is recommended as first-line therapy in treatment guidelines. Despite the extensive characterization of siltuximab treatment in clinical trials, available evidence from real-world practice is still scant. This collection of clinical experiences focuses on patients treated with siltuximab therapy, particularly regarding the idiopathic multicentric CD diagnostic work-up, and on treatment administration in patients with complex disease entering differential diagnosis with CD or concomitant diseases. Thus, these data help further characterize and improve the use of siltuximab in real practice in terms of effectiveness and safety of long-term administration as well as consequences of treatment interruption.
卡斯特曼病(CD)是一组淋巴细胞增生性疾病,具有共同的组织病理学特征,但病因、临床特征、严重程度、治疗方法和疗效却大相径庭。目前,西妥昔单抗是美国食品药品管理局(FDA)和欧洲药品管理局(EMA)批准用于特发性多中心 CD 的唯一疗法,并被治疗指南推荐为一线疗法。尽管西妥昔单抗的治疗在临床试验中得到了广泛的表征,但现实世界中的可用证据仍然很少。本临床经验集重点关注接受西妥昔单抗治疗的患者,尤其是特发性多中心 CD 诊断工作,以及进入 CD 或伴随疾病鉴别诊断的复杂疾病患者的治疗管理。因此,从长期用药的有效性和安全性以及治疗中断的后果来看,这些数据有助于进一步描述和改进在实际应用中使用西妥昔单抗的情况。
{"title":"Real-practice management and treatment of idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease with siltuximab: a collection of clinical experiences.","authors":"Bernardo Rossini, Nicola Cecchi, Felice Clemente, Maria Rosaria De Paolis, Stefan Hohaus, Vanessa Innao, Mariano Lucignano, Roberto Massaiu, Giovanna Palumbo, Gian Matteo Rigolin, Francesca Gaia Rossi, Luisa Verga, Attilio Guarini","doi":"10.7573/dic.2023-9-4","DOIUrl":"10.7573/dic.2023-9-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Castleman disease (CD) is a group of lymphoproliferative disorders that share common histopathological features yet have widely different aetiologies, clinical features and grades of severity as well as treatments and outcomes. Siltuximab is currently the only therapy approved by the FDA and EMA for idiopathic multicentric CD and is recommended as first-line therapy in treatment guidelines. Despite the extensive characterization of siltuximab treatment in clinical trials, available evidence from real-world practice is still scant. This collection of clinical experiences focuses on patients treated with siltuximab therapy, particularly regarding the idiopathic multicentric CD diagnostic work-up, and on treatment administration in patients with complex disease entering differential diagnosis with CD or concomitant diseases. Thus, these data help further characterize and improve the use of siltuximab in real practice in terms of effectiveness and safety of long-term administration as well as consequences of treatment interruption.</p>","PeriodicalId":11362,"journal":{"name":"Drugs in Context","volume":"13 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10954290/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140179389","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-12eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.7573/dic.2023-4-5
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.7573/dic.2023-9-4.].
[此处更正了文章 DOI:10.7573/dic.2023-9-4]。
{"title":"Corrigendum: Real-practice management and treatment of idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease with siltuximab: a collection of clinical experiences.","authors":"","doi":"10.7573/dic.2023-4-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7573/dic.2023-4-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>[This corrects the article DOI: 10.7573/dic.2023-9-4.].</p>","PeriodicalId":11362,"journal":{"name":"Drugs in Context","volume":"13 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11186603/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141426515","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-27eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.7573/dic.2023-11-1
Coral González Fernández, Jose Antonio Ros Lucas, Maria Molina Molina, Juan Rigual Bobillo, Rogelio Alejandro García Montenegro, Raquel Fernández González, Ana Jaureguiza Oriol, Jose Abal Arca
Background: Occupational exposure to silica is related to autoimmune diseases and features of autoimmunity, mainly autoantibodies. The study objectives were to estimate the prevalence of silicosis with associated autoimmune findings or diagnosed autoimmune diseases in Spain, and to assess the clinical and functional characteristics of affected patients.
Methods: This is a multicentre prospective study in patients diagnosed with silicosis. Autoantibodies analysed were antinuclear antibodies, isotypes IgA, IgM and IgG, rheumatoid factor, anticyclic citrullinated peptide, anti-Scl70, anti-Ro, and anti-LA. Pulmonary function tests were performed.
Results: Autoimmunity was assessed in 105 patients. Autoimmune findings were recorded in 29 (27%) patients, including antinuclear antibodies (n=21), anti-Ro (n=7), rheumatoid factor (n=5) and anti-Scl70 (n=3). Autoimmune disease was diagnosed in 16 (15%) patients, mainly rheumatoid arthritis (n=7) and systemic lupus erythematosus (n=4). Patients with silicosis and autoimmune findings had a lower mean time of exposure to silica and showed a trend toward lower values in pulmonary function tests.
Conclusions: Autoimmune findings and diagnosis of autoimmune diseases were frequent in patients with silicosis in Spain.
{"title":"Autoimmune findings in patients with silicosis in Spain.","authors":"Coral González Fernández, Jose Antonio Ros Lucas, Maria Molina Molina, Juan Rigual Bobillo, Rogelio Alejandro García Montenegro, Raquel Fernández González, Ana Jaureguiza Oriol, Jose Abal Arca","doi":"10.7573/dic.2023-11-1","DOIUrl":"10.7573/dic.2023-11-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Occupational exposure to silica is related to autoimmune diseases and features of autoimmunity, mainly autoantibodies. The study objectives were to estimate the prevalence of silicosis with associated autoimmune findings or diagnosed autoimmune diseases in Spain, and to assess the clinical and functional characteristics of affected patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a multicentre prospective study in patients diagnosed with silicosis. Autoantibodies analysed were antinuclear antibodies, isotypes IgA, IgM and IgG, rheumatoid factor, anticyclic citrullinated peptide, anti-Scl70, anti-Ro, and anti-LA. Pulmonary function tests were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Autoimmunity was assessed in 105 patients. Autoimmune findings were recorded in 29 (27%) patients, including antinuclear antibodies (<i>n</i>=21), anti-Ro (<i>n</i>=7), rheumatoid factor (<i>n</i>=5) and anti-Scl70 (<i>n</i>=3). Autoimmune disease was diagnosed in 16 (15%) patients, mainly rheumatoid arthritis (<i>n</i>=7) and systemic lupus erythematosus (<i>n</i>=4). Patients with silicosis and autoimmune findings had a lower mean time of exposure to silica and showed a trend toward lower values in pulmonary function tests.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Autoimmune findings and diagnosis of autoimmune diseases were frequent in patients with silicosis in Spain.</p>","PeriodicalId":11362,"journal":{"name":"Drugs in Context","volume":"13 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10911535/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140027702","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-05eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.7573/dic.2023-7-5
Raffaella Palumbo, Erica Quaquarini, Giuseppe Saltalamacchia, Alberto Malovini, Pietro Lapidari, Barbara Tagliaferri, Ludovica Mollica, Cristina Maria Teragni, Chiara Barletta, Laura Deborah Locati, Federico Sottotetti
Background: Breast cancer is the most frequent tumour worldwide, and the HR+/HER2- subtype is the most common. For this tumour type, endocrine therapy (ET) is the mainstay of treatment. The association of ET and CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) represents the gold standard for first-line or second-line therapies. However, the optimal therapeutic strategy after CDK4/6i progression is still a matter of debate, with several randomized clinical trials still ongoing.
Patients and methods: This is an observational, prospective, real-world study including women with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer progressing to palbociclib plus ET. Patients received either ET or chemotherapy (CT). The primary objective was the evaluation of efficacy of the different therapeutic strategies after palbociclib in terms of median progression-free survival 2. Secondary objectives were the activity of therapeutic strategies measured with the clinical benefit rate, evaluation of the parameters used for the treatment choice, and progression-free survival 1 related to palbociclib plus ET treatment.
Results: Overall, 48 patients (median age 53, range 33-78 years) were included. The median progression-free survival 2 was of 5 months in the overall cohort (95% CI 4-48 months) with a statistically significant difference between the two therapeutic strategies adopted (ET versus CT, 10 months versus 5 months, respectively). Regarding secondary objectives, the clinical benefit rate was 55.2% in the CT cohort and 50% in ET. Moreover, women treated with CT had a greater number of visceral metastases and a shorter median progression-free survival 1 than patients who received ET.
Conclusions: ET and CT represent two possible therapeutic alternatives for patients progressing on CDK4/6i plus ET. The choice is based on clinical parameters, with a potential preference for ET.
背景:乳腺癌是全球发病率最高的肿瘤,其中 HR+/HER2- 亚型最为常见。对于这种肿瘤类型,内分泌治疗(ET)是主要的治疗手段。ET与CDK4/6抑制剂(CDK4/6i)的联合应用代表了一线或二线治疗的黄金标准。然而,CDK4/6i进展后的最佳治疗策略仍存在争议,几项随机临床试验仍在进行中:这是一项观察性、前瞻性、真实世界研究,研究对象包括HR+/HER2-转移性乳腺癌进展至palbociclib加ET的女性患者。患者接受 ET 或化疗 (CT)。首要目标是评估帕博西尼治疗后不同治疗策略在中位无进展生存期2方面的疗效。次要目标是以临床获益率衡量治疗策略的活性、评估用于治疗选择的参数以及与palbociclib加ET治疗相关的无进展生存期1:共纳入48名患者(中位年龄53岁,33-78岁)。中位无进展生存期2为5个月(95% CI为4-48个月),两种治疗策略(ET与CT,分别为10个月与5个月)之间存在显著统计学差异。在次要目标方面,CT组的临床获益率为55.2%,ET组为50%。此外,与接受ET治疗的患者相比,接受CT治疗的女性内脏转移灶更多,中位无进展生存期1更短:ET和CT是CDK4/6i加ET治疗进展期患者的两种可能的治疗选择。选择取决于临床参数,可能更倾向于 ET。
{"title":"Efficacy and activity of treatments after progression from palbociclib plus endocrine therapy in patients with HR<sup>+</sup>/HER2<sup>-</sup> metastatic breast cancer: a prospective, monocentric study.","authors":"Raffaella Palumbo, Erica Quaquarini, Giuseppe Saltalamacchia, Alberto Malovini, Pietro Lapidari, Barbara Tagliaferri, Ludovica Mollica, Cristina Maria Teragni, Chiara Barletta, Laura Deborah Locati, Federico Sottotetti","doi":"10.7573/dic.2023-7-5","DOIUrl":"10.7573/dic.2023-7-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast cancer is the most frequent tumour worldwide, and the HR<sup>+</sup>/HER2<sup>-</sup> subtype is the most common. For this tumour type, endocrine therapy (ET) is the mainstay of treatment. The association of ET and CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) represents the gold standard for first-line or second-line therapies. However, the optimal therapeutic strategy after CDK4/6i progression is still a matter of debate, with several randomized clinical trials still ongoing.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This is an observational, prospective, real-world study including women with HR<sup>+</sup>/HER2<sup>-</sup> metastatic breast cancer progressing to palbociclib plus ET. Patients received either ET or chemotherapy (CT). The primary objective was the evaluation of efficacy of the different therapeutic strategies after palbociclib in terms of median progression-free survival 2. Secondary objectives were the activity of therapeutic strategies measured with the clinical benefit rate, evaluation of the parameters used for the treatment choice, and progression-free survival 1 related to palbociclib plus ET treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 48 patients (median age 53, range 33-78 years) were included. The median progression-free survival 2 was of 5 months in the overall cohort (95% CI 4-48 months) with a statistically significant difference between the two therapeutic strategies adopted (ET <i>versus</i> CT, 10 months <i>versus</i> 5 months, respectively). Regarding secondary objectives, the clinical benefit rate was 55.2% in the CT cohort and 50% in ET. Moreover, women treated with CT had a greater number of visceral metastases and a shorter median progression-free survival 1 than patients who received ET.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ET and CT represent two possible therapeutic alternatives for patients progressing on CDK4/6i plus ET. The choice is based on clinical parameters, with a potential preference for ET.</p>","PeriodicalId":11362,"journal":{"name":"Drugs in Context","volume":"13 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10852029/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139706375","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}