Drug Safety最新文献

Background: The incidence of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is not known for most prescription medications. We aimed to estimate the incidence of DILI for commonly prescribed outpatient drugs.

Methods: To establish a baseline estimate of DILI incidence, we used the estimated incidence (EI) of amoxicillin/clavulanate DILI from a previous population-based study in Iceland. This was combined with the multicenter prospective DILI Network (DILIN) cohort and the US population-based Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS). From 2005 to 2019, prescription drugs with at least five bona fide DILIN cases and data from at least 10 of the 15 years from MEPS during that timeframe were included. The EI for 'drug A' was calculated as follows: $\text{EI}\left(\text{drug A}\right)=\text{EI}\left(\text{AC}\right)\times \frac{\#\text{DILIN cases of drug A}}{\#\text{annual new prescriptions of drug A}}\times \frac{\#\text{annual new prescriptions of AC}}{\#\text{DILIN cases of AC}}$ RESULTS: In total, 30 drugs met the inclusion criteria, of which 11 were antibiotics, 4 were antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), 4 were statins, and 11 were other drug types. The highest EI was seen with azathioprine and older AEDs, with one DILI case per 349-2329 new prescriptions. The EI of antibiotics ranged greatly, with the highest risk seen for minocycline, amoxicillin/clavulanate, and nitrofurantoin (approximately 1:1000-2400 new prescriptions), and lowest risk for clindamycin, doxycycline, azithromycin, and amoxicillin (approximately 1:40,000-170,000 new prescriptions). The EI for commonly prescribed statins was approximately 1:10,000-50,000. Important medication classes with > 5 million new prescriptions from 2005 to 2019 but fewer than five DILIN cases included β-blockers, thiazide diuretics, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and metformin, which presumably have very low DILI incidence.

Conclusions: The highest EI was found for azathioprine, older antiepileptics, and minocycline. In contrast, many widely used drugs are rare causes of DILI. These findings may help clinicians better weigh potential benefits of medications against hepatotoxicity risk.

Background and objective: Medication use is increasing to treat both pre-existing and pregnancy-related medical conditions or complications. This study aims to investigate factors associated with multiple medication use during pregnancy, as well as any increased risk of pregnancy complications for women taking multiple medications.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of routinely collected medical records of singleton pregnant women was conducted in Southeast Melbourne, Australia, between 2016 and 2021. Self-reported medication use was recorded as part of routine medical care, starting from the first antenatal booking appointment and continuing for every subsequent antenatal appointment until birth. Multimorbidity was defined as having two or more medical conditions. Logistic regression was used to assess factors influencing multiple medication use (defined as taking two or more non-supplemental medications at any stage of pregnancy) and associations with pregnancy complications.

Results: Of 48,502 participants, 34.9% used one medication, while 11.7% used multiple medications. Women of older age (30-34, 35-39, and ≥  40 years), higher body mass index (25.0-29.9 kg/m² and ≥  30 kg/m²), born in Australasia and Oceania, higher socioeconomic status, and multimorbidity were more likely to use multiple medications during pregnancy. Women taking multiple medications had a higher risk of preterm and caesarean deliveries, fetal death, and neonatal admissions to intensive care. Sensitivity analyses exploring different morbidity categories produced no changes to findings.

Conclusions: Medication use during pregnancy is prevalent, with many pregnant mothers taking multiple medications. Given the rising maternal age, body mass index, and morbidities in pregnancy, the use of medications during pregnancy is increasing. Such use correlates with an increased chance of adverse pregnancy outcomes. In the context of limited trials on the safety and efficacy of medications in pregnancy, timely harnessing of the information available within routine medical records for post-marketing surveillance is important.

Introduction

A clinical trial of Epidiolex^®, the only US FDA-approved cannabis-derived consumer product (CDP), discovered an interaction with an immunosuppressant (tacrolimus) that led to drug toxicity, highlighting the unique intersection of prescription and commonly unregulated consumer products.

Objective

We aimed to identify if similar drug–drug interactions (DDIs) are occurring among the consumer CDP market, even though they cannot be identified through trials.

Methods

We searched Reddit for subreddits related to CDPs or health, resulting in 63,561,233 posts. From these, we identified 190 posts discussing both immunosuppressants and CDPs. Two blinded investigators evaluated the following. (1) Was there a concern about a potential DDI between consumer CDPs and immunosuppressants? (2) Was there a unique adverse event attributed to a DDI between consumer CDPs and immunosuppressants?

Results

Of these, 66 posts (35%) expressed concern about a potential DDI, such as “Hey, my partner wants to try my edibles … she’s on Prograf [tacrolimus] and wants to talk to a stoner who’s had a heart transplant.” Four posts (2%) reported a unique DDI, such as “I have clinical results that are semi-anecdotal, showing the coordination to my halting substance use … It's the CBD. Shot my prograf to 30 at like 4 mg.” Two of the four reported DDIs are similar to those first reported for Epidiolex. The remaining two reported DDIs include a potential cannabidiol (CBD)/sirolimus or delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)/sirolimus interaction and a THC/tacrolimus interaction, both resulting in drug toxicity.

Conclusion

This case study is the first to report on DDIs involving consumer CDPs, including both CBD and THC products, as well as a broader class of immunosuppressants. This demonstrates the risks associated with using consumer CDPs alongside prescription medications while highlighting the need for development of increased surveillance to monitor consumer CDPs for drug safety signals, as well as comprehensive regulations that take into account the unique characteristics of the consumer marketplace.

Hypouricemia is defined as a serum uric acid concentration of ≤ 2.0 mg/dL or 119 μmol/L. Hypouricemia may occur secondarily to a number of underlying conditions, including severe hepatocellular disease, neoplasia, defective renal tubular reabsorption of uric acid, inherited metabolic defect in purine metabolism, and drugs. Medications are an important cause of hypouricemia. They can cause hypouricemia by a variety of mechanisms. Drug-induced hypouricemia mostly occurs as overtreatment of hyperuricemia by urate-lowering therapies including xanthine oxidase inhibitors, uricosuric agents and uricases. Drugs not used in the treatment of gout may also lead to a decrease of uric acid levels. In this literature review, medications leading to hypouricemia are summarized with regard to their mechanism of action and clinical significance.

Background and Objective

The use of herbal products globally is substantial, but varying definitions and regulatory frameworks have led to differences in their status as medicinal products and in approaches to monitoring their safety. This article explores the current landscape of herbal pharmacovigilance, drawing insights from interviews with global experts in the field, and offers recommendations for best practices to enhance the safety and benefit-to-harm balance of herbal products.

Methods

This study comprised semi-structured interviews with members of the International Society of Pharmacovigilance-Herbal and Traditional Medicines Special Interest Group and the Nutrivigilance Information Exchange Network, recruited using purposive sampling. Data were stored and coded using NVIVO^® and analysed thematically using a qualitative inductive approach.

Results

Sixteen participants from 11 countries were interviewed, revealing diverse regulatory approaches and challenges in herbal pharmacovigilance. Key themes included legal status, awareness, identification and coding of herbal products, pre-/post-marketing product control, reporting of adverse drug reactions, causality assessment and signals of herbal products. This study yielded five general recommendations to further improve herbal pharmacovigilance worldwide.

Conclusions

This study offers an overview of the global landscape of herbal pharmacovigilance, highlighting challenges in monitoring herbal products and presenting universal recommendations. These recommendations encompass increasing awareness, enhancing education and improving legislative frameworks. Given the growing use of herbal products, the implementation of strong pharmacovigilance practices is crucial to ensure consumer safety.

Background

Use of heart failure-exacerbating medications (HFEMs) may lead to preventable episodes of acute decompensated heart failure (HF). HFEMs use is common in patients with HF, and there may be opportunities to reduce their use from the emergency department (ED).

Methods

We performed an observational study on patients with HF presenting to EDs within a healthcare system between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2020. Patients with chronic HF were identified using diagnostic codes within the electronic health record. The cohort was restricted to ambulatory (i.e., discharged to home) ED encounters. Medications, either ordered in the ED or prescribed at ED discharge, were extracted from the medication administration record and identified as potential HFEMs based on the 2016 American Heart Association Scientific Statement. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the prevalence of HFEM use during ambulatory ED encounters. Exploratory analyses to identify correlates of HFEM use were performed.

Results

The study cohort included 23,907 ED encounters. ED administration or prescription of HFEMs occurred during 20% of ambulatory ED encounters. HFEM administration in the ED (17%) was more common than HFEM prescription at ED discharge (6%). The most common HFEMs administered in the ED included nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (11%) and albuterol (7%).

Conclusion

HFEM use is common in patients with HF seeking ED care, occurring in roughly one-fifth of ambulatory ED encounters. There may be opportunities to optimize medication use among patients with HF in the ED.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to investigate the cardiovascular safety of romosozumab in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Romosozumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting sclerostin, has been shown to increase bone mineral density and reduce the risk of osteoporotic fractures. However, in previous studies, romosozumab therapy was identified as a potential risk factor for cardiovascular events, particularly in patients with predisposing cardiovascular disease.

Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in the Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the safety and efficacy of romosozumab versus alendronate, teriparatide, denosumab, or placebo in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Contrast-based network meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. The pooled estimates are presented as risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals.

Results: Of the 5282 articles retrieved, 25 RCTs were included in this review (n = 24,942), and 18 randomized controlled trials (n = 16,777) were included in the network meta-analysis. The results indicated no significant differences in cardiovascular mortality rate between romosozumab and placebo. Regarding the risk of major cardiovascular events, no significant differences were found in the direct evidence or the network meta-analysis with placebo as the reference.

Conclusion: Romosozumab might be a safe option for treating postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. The cardiovascular concerns associated with this treatment seem less significant than previously suggested, although additional real-world data are required to confirm this conclusion.

Background: Overexpression of C-C motif chemokine ligand 24 (CCL24) is associated with inflammatory and fibrotic diseases, including primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), systemic sclerosis, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). CM-101 is a humanized monoclonal antibody that neutralizes CCL24 to attenuate inflammation and fibrosis in preclinical models. Here we report the results from two Phase 1a studies investigating the safety and tolerability of intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) CM-101 in healthy participants, and in one Phase 1b study of IV and SC CM-101 in patients with MASLD without evidence of MASH.

Methods: In each dose group (0.75 mg/kg, 2.5 mg/kg, 5.0 mg/kg, and 10.0 mg/kg) of the single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 1a IV study, healthy volunteers were randomized 3:1 to receive a single IV infusion of CM-101 or placebo. In another Phase 1a, single-center, double-blind placebo-controlled study, healthy volunteers were randomized 3:1 to receive a single SC injection of CM-101 5.0 mg/kg or placebo. In the multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 1b MASLD study, patients with MASLD without evidence of MASH were randomized 3:1 to receive the following: cohort 1, IV CM-101 2.5 mg/kg or placebo, and cohort 2, SC CM-101 5.0 mg/kg or placebo every three weeks for 12 weeks. The primary endpoints (for all these studies) were safety, tolerability, and serum pharmacokinetic parameters of CM-101.

Results: In each study, adverse events were rare and mild to moderate. The CM-101 pharmacokinetics profile was typical of a monoclonal antibody, with a terminal half-life of approximately 19 days when given IV and approximately 17 days when given as SC injection. In patients with MASLD without evidence of MASH, CM-101 was associated with decreased serum levels of inflammatory, fibrotic, and collagen turnover biomarkers.

Conclusions: In healthy volunteers and patients with MASLD without evidence of MASH, IV and SC CM-101 was well tolerated at doses ranging from 0.75 mg/kg to10.0 mg/kg and engaged its target (i.e., CCL24), indicating therapeutic potential in treating inflammatory and fibrotic diseases.

Clinical trial retrospectively registration: NCT06025851, NCT06037577, and NCT06044467. Date of registration: September 2023.