Dysphagia最新文献

Oral intake restrictions due to dysphagia in the intensive care unit (ICU) can increase morbidity, mortality, and negatively impact quality of life. The current oral intake practice and clinical management strategies for addressing dysphagia in the ICU are not well-defined. This study aimed to elucidate the clinical practices surrounding oral intake restrictions due to dysphagia and its management strategies in the ICU. A multicenter, prospective, cross-sectional, 2-day point prevalence study was conducted in Japan. Relevant data on the clinical circumstances surrounding oral intake practice and the implementation of strategies to prevent dysphagia for patients admitted to the ICU on November 1, 2023, and December 1, 2023, were collected. The primary outcome was the prevalence of oral intake restrictions in patients, defined by a Functional Oral Intake Scale score of less than 7 among eligible patients for oral intake. Out of 326 participants, 187 were eligible for the final analysis after excluding 139 patients who were not eligible for oral intake, primarily due to tracheal intubation. Among those eligible, 69.0% (129/187) encountered oral intake restrictions. About 52.4% (98/187) of patients underwent swallowing screenings; 36.7% (36/98) of these were suspected of having dysphagia. Compensatory and behavioral swallowing rehabilitation were provided to 21.9% (41/187) and 10.6% (20/187) of patients, respectively, from ICU admission to the survey date. Only 27.4% (14/51) of post-extubation and 9.3% (3/32) of post-stroke patients received swallowing rehabilitation. Notably, no ICUs had dedicated speech and language therapists, and most (85.7%, 18/21) lacked established swallowing rehabilitation protocols. This 2-point prevalence survey study revealed that oral intake restrictions due to dysphagia are common in ICUs, but few patients are screened for swallowing issues or receive rehabilitation. More clinical studies are needed to develop effective protocols for identifying and managing dysphagia, including screenings and rehabilitation in the ICU.

Dysphagia is a prevalent complication before, during and after treatment for head and neck cancer (HNC). Besides the medical and societal consequences, dysphagia has a negative impact on functioning, activity, participation and quality of life. These aspects are all affected by the environmental factors (EF). However, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) such as the Head-and-Neck Cancer Survivors' Assessment of Mealtimes (HNSAM), which thoroughly assess participation and EF in addition to function and activity, are rare. Therefore, this study aimed to translate and validate the HNSAM into Dutch (D-HNSAM). The HNSAM was translated according to the standardized procedure of translation & back-translation and according to the international cross-cultural adaptation process. A pilot study was then conducted with 10 HNC patients to assess the linguistic features and comprehensibility of the test items. Finally, the D-HNSAM was completed by 50 participants who were at least 6 months post-treatment for HNC. The Performance Status Scale for Head and Neck cancer patients (PSS-HN)- subscales normalcy of diet and eating in public, the Dysphagia Handicap Index (DHI), the Functional Oral Intake scale (FOIS) and the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation (USER-P) were used to examine the psychometric properties of the D-HNSAM. High correlations with related assessment tools and low correlations with unrelated assessment tools were expected. Internal consistency was found to be weak to good. Test-retest reliability, convergent validity and divergent validity were demonstrated except for the EF subscale. The D-HNSAM can detect differences in impact of dysphagia on daily functioning and quality of life. The D-HNSAM is a reliable and clinically valuable PROM for assessing the impact of dysphagia on daily functioning and quality of life in patients with HNC. The unique aspect of this PROM, the subscale EF, has unfortunately weak psychometric properties and requires further refinement.

Swallowing is considered a three-phase mechanism involving the oral, pharyngeal, and esophageal phases. The pharyngeal phase relies on highly coordinated movements in the pharynx and larynx to move food through the aerodigestive crossing. While the brainstem has been identified as the primary control center for the pharyngeal phase of swallowing, existing evidence suggests that the higher brain regions can contribute to controlling the pharyngeal phase of swallowing to match the motor response to the current context and task at hand. This suggests that the pharyngeal phase of swallowing cannot be exclusively reflexive or voluntary but can be regulated by the two neural controlling systems, goal-directed and non-goal-directed. This capability allows the pharyngeal phase of swallowing to adjust appropriately based on cognitive input, learned knowledge, and predictions. This paper reviews existing evidence and accordingly develops a novel perspective to explain these capabilities of the pharyngeal phase of swallowing. This paper aims (1) to integrate and comprehend the neurophysiological mechanisms involved in the pharyngeal phase of swallowing, (2) to explore the reflexive (non-goal-directed) and voluntary (goal-directed) neural systems of controlling the pharyngeal phase of swallowing, (3) to provide a clinical translation regarding the pathologies of these two systems, and (4) to highlight the existing gaps in this area that require attention in future research. This paper, in particular, aims to explore the complex neurophysiology of the pharyngeal phase of swallowing, as its breakdown can lead to serious consequences such as aspiration pneumonia or death.

Identifying and addressing daily challenges and resources associated with chronic oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) is a pivotal, though still neglected component of person-centred care, yet overlooked in research studies. To investigate these dimensions, 25 Italian adults with chronic OD due to cancer or neurodegenerative diseases participated in semi-structured interviews, designed following a modified framework analysis approach. Two researchers independently transcribed and coded interviews, elaborated a working analytical framework, indexed and charted the data, solving discrepancies through negotiated agreement and discussion with a third researcher. Proportion agreement on extracted quotations was calculated. Overall, 457 quotations were extracted from the interviews (88% agreement). Daily challenges pertained to physical, practical, and social domains; most participants reported OD-related problems; almost half mentioned care needs and obstacles in using healthcare services. Concerning resources in OD management, most participants referred to problem-focused and meaning-focused coping strategies, personal capabilities, and support from family and healthcare services. Finally, almost half of the participants reported OD-related changes in life view and meaning. Findings suggest that adjusting to OD implies challenges and resource mobilization in different life domains. Future studies should longitudinally elucidate the dynamics of positive adjustment, to promote patient-centred OD care based on individually perceived needs and challenges, and to inform healthcare policies.

Dysphagia affects up to 70% of older adults living in residential long-term care settings (RLTCS) and may lead to serious complications if not identified and adequately managed. However, there is a dearth of clinical guidelines tailored to older adults at risk of dysphagia in RLTCS. An online survey consisting of 40 questions was conducted to identify dysphagia screening practices, referral patterns and interventions implemented by nurses in cases of suspected dysphagia, to quantify the number of residents with dysphagia, episodes of aspiration pneumonia in the previous year, and use of modified texture diets and fluids and explore differences between groups of RLTCS. The survey was developed using Qualtrics XM Platform and circulated via email, with one response per RLTCS sought. Data were analysed using RStudio. Of the 429 RLTCS contacted, 45 completed and returned the survey, a 10.5% response rate. Dysphagia screening practices, referral patterns, and dysphagia management interventions varied across participating RLTCS. All participants reported that they observe for signs and symptoms of dysphagia at mealtimes to identify residents at-risk of dysphagia. Ninety six percent of RLTCS reported referring residents with suspected dysphagia to speech and language therapy dysphagia services. A diagnosis of dysphagia was reported in 35.3% of residents. All participating RLTCS reported providing modified texture diets and fluids if residents had suspected dysphagia. The implementation of standardised and validated dysphagia screening protocols in RLTCS in the Republic of Ireland may be useful in supporting the identification of at-risk residents.

Clinicians should consider disorders of masticatory muscle including lateral pterygoid muscle as a differential diagnosis in patients presenting with dysphagia and trismus after tooth extraction.

Swallowing is an essential process to maintain homeostasis in the human body. With aging, changes occur in both central and peripheral structures, giving rise to presbyphagia, involving morphological and functional alterations in swallowing. However, there is a lack of consensus on the definition of presbyphagia and its relationship with dysphagia. The primary objective of this research is to analyze the proposed definitions for the term "presbyphagia" in specialized literature and, secondarily, to assess how these definitions can influence the diagnosis of oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD). A systematic review was conducted to analyze the proposed definitions of presbyphagia and their impact on dysphagia diagnosis. Three main approaches to the definitions of presbyphagia were identified: (1) presbyphagia as an alteration in the swallowing process in healthy older adults, (2) presbyphagia as a swallowing disorder compensated by the physiological potential of healthy older adults, and (3) presbyphagia as a synonym for dysphagia. This study addresses the need for a clear definition of presbyphagia in older adults. It is concluded that presbyphagia should be understood as the etiology of OD rather than a compensated disorder or a synonym. This has significant implications for the diagnosis and treatment of swallowing disorders in the aging population. Given the ongoing nature of scientific discussion in this field, further research is required.

Trismus commonly arises after surgery for head and neck cancer (HNC) and its severity is potentiated by postoperative radiotherapy. While the benefit of trismus rehabilitation after surgery and radiotherapy is well established, the evidence during radiotherapy is less clear. This may be due to poor adherence to trismus exercises secondary to acute mucositis. This study assessed the feasibility of using a novel trismus device during adjuvant radiotherapy for HNC in patients with acute postoperative trismus. Prospective single-arm cohort feasibility study. Eligible patients had undergone surgery with curative intent for HNC, planned for adjuvant radiotherapy, and were suitable for trismus rehabilitation. Participants completed a 10-week exercise program using a novel jaw stretching device. Study outcomes were adherence, maximal incisal opening (MIO), and trismus-related function and quality of life scores, assessed at baseline, 10 weeks, and 6 months after commencing exercises. Nine patients diagnosed with trismus after primary surgery were recruited. The mean increase in MIO at 10 weeks was 7.8 mm (range -4 to 15 mm, p = 0.03), and at 6 months was 10.6 mm (range 1-26 mm, p = 0.03). Significant improvements were observed in trismus-related quality of life (Gothenburg Trismus Questionnaire; p = 0.04). Adherence to the exercises was 100% in week 1-2, 67% in weeks 3-6, and 100% at 10 weeks (1 month post radiation). This study demonstrates the feasibility of using a novel jaw stretching device during adjuvant radiotherapy. Further evaluation is warranted to assess the effectiveness of early intervention and prevention of trismus during HNC radiotherapy.Level of Evidence: IV.

Insufficient suprahyoid muscle strength with poor opening of the upper esophageal sphincter can cause dysphagia. This study investigated whether an exercise of the suprahyoid muscle, named forehead exercise for suprahyoid muscles (FESM, "Enge-Odeko-Taiso" in Japanese), improves the geniohyoid muscle area and intensity using ultrasonography. Sixty-four participants (15 men and 49 women, 82.8 ± 6.0 years) living independently with no symptoms of swallowing difficulties were enrolled. The participants were divided into the FESM and the control group. The FESM is an isometric exercise involving repetitions of looking into the navel as if the chin is pulled back with little neck motion using a hand pushed against the forehead for resistance. This exercise is performed five times in 10 courses a day (total 50 times) for 8 weeks. Participants in the control group did not conduct any exercises. Body mass index, hand grip strength, gait speed, calf circumference, Mini Nutritional Assessment short-form, eating assessment tool, repetitive saliva swallowing test (RSST), and Food Intake LEVEL Scale scores were examined. The ultrasonographic geniohyoid muscle area, intensity, and RSST were investigated before and after the program. In the FESM group, the geniohyoid muscle area increased from 2.24 to 2.52 cm² (P < 0.05), intensity decreased from 34.6 to 32.0 (P < 0.05), and the median RSST increased from 5 to 6 (P < 0.05) significantly. Conversely, no significant differences were observed in the control group. The FESM was effective to increase the area and decrease the intensity of the geniohyoid muscle and may improve swallowing function.