Dysphagia最新文献

Patients with pseudobulbar palsy often present with velopharyngeal incompetence. Velopharyngeal incompetence is usually observed during expiratory activities such as speech and/or blowing during laryngoscopy. These patients typically exhibit good velopharyngeal closure during swallowing, which is dissociated from expiratory activities. We named this phenomenon "speech-swallow dissociation" (SSD). SSD on endoscopic findings can help in diagnosing the underlying disease causing dysphagia. This endoscopic finding is qualitative, and the quantitative characteristics of SSD are still unclear. Accordingly, the current study aimed to quantitatively evaluate SSD in patients with pseudobulbar palsy. We evaluated velopharyngeal pressure during swallowing and expiratory activity in 10 healthy subjects and 10 patients with pseudobulbar palsy using high-resolution manometry, and compared the results between the two groups. No significant differences in maximal velopharyngeal contraction pressure (V-Pmax) were observed during dry swallowing between the pseudobulbar palsy group and healthy subjects (190.5 mmHg vs. 173.6 mmHg; P = 0.583). V-Pmax during speech was significantly decreased in the pseudobulbar palsy group (85.4 mmHg vs. 34.5 mmHg; P < 0.001). The degree of dissociation of speech to swallowing in V-Pmax, when compared across groups, exhibited a larger difference in the pseudobulbar palsy group, at 52% versus 80% (P = 0.001). Velopharyngeal pressure during blowing was similar to that during speech. Velopharyngeal closure in patients with pseudobulbar palsy exhibited weaker pressure during speech and blowing compared with swallowing, quantitatively confirming the presence of SSD. Pseudobulbar palsy often presents with SSD, and this finding may be helpful in differentiating the etiology of dysphagia.

The majority of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) develop swallowing, speech, and voice (SSV) disorders. Importantly, swallowing difficulty or dysphagia and related aspiration are life-threatening conditions for PD patients. Although PD treatments have significant therapeutic effects on limb motor function, their effects on SSV disorders are less impressive. A large gap in our knowledge is that the mechanisms of SSV disorders in PD are poorly understood. PD was long considered to be a central nervous system disorder caused by the death of dopaminergic neurons in the basal ganglia. Aggregates of phosphorylated α-synuclein (PAS) underlie PD pathology. SSV disorders were thought to be caused by the same dopaminergic problem as those causing impaired limb movement; however, there is little evidence to support this. The pharynx, larynx, and tongue play a critical role in performing upper airway (UA) motor tasks and their dysfunction results in disordered SSV. This review aims to provide an overview on the neuromuscular organization patterns, functions of the UA structures, clinical features of SSV disorders, and gaps in knowledge regarding the pathophysiology underlying SSV disorders in PD, and evidence supporting the hypothesis that SSV disorders in PD could be associated, at least in part, with PAS damage to the peripheral nervous system controlling the UA structures. Determining the presence and distribution of PAS lesions in the pharynx, larynx, and tongue will facilitate the identification of peripheral therapeutic targets and set a foundation for the development of new therapies to treat SSV disorders in PD.

Objective: This review evaluates the efficacy and safety of dysphagia interventions for patients with prolonged endotracheal intubation (⩾48 h) in critical care units.

Data sources: We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase, OVID, CINAHL, Wanfang (China), CNKI (China), and ProQuest Dissertations for studies published up to December 31, 2023.

Study selection: Inclusion criteria encompassed randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-randomized trials, and cohort studies comparing dysphagia rehabilitation - such as swallowing stimulation, swallowing and respiratory muscle exercise, and neuromuscular electrical stimulation - with standard care or no treatment. The primary outcomes assessed were dysphagia severity, time to resume oral intake, and incidence of aspiration and aspiration pneumonia.

Data extraction: Detailed information on study design, setting, participant demographics, interventions, and outcomes was systematically extracted.

Data synthesis: Our analysis included ten studies with a total of 1031 participants. The findings demonstrate a significant reduction in dysphagia severity, time to oral intake and the risk of aspiration pneumonia, and an improvement in quality of life among patients receiving swallowing therapy. However, no substantial difference was found in nutritional status. Limited data availability necessitated a descriptive presentation of outcomes like the risk of aspiration, ICU/hospital stay duration, pharyngeal/oral residue severity, and intervention-related adverse events.

Conclusion: The current evidence for the effectiveness of dysphagia interventions in critically ill patients with prolonged endotracheal intubation is limited. There is a pressing need for future research, particularly high-quality RCTs employing standardized outcome measures, to substantiate these findings.

People with Intellectual Disability (ID) were more likely to contract COVID-19 infection and more likely to die from the consequences. However, there is no evidence on the long-term impact of COVID-19 infection in people with ID. Post-Covid Syndrome (PCS) is an established diagnosis that requires specialist clinical support. To date there is no data on how common PCS is in people with ID, or how symptoms present. Dysphagia is identified as a clinical marker because of the known association with PCS, and the clear objective diagnostic criteria applicable through specialist assessment. This investigation presents a cohort of people with ID, who developed dysphagia/worsening of dysphagia post diagnosis with COVID-19. Cases were identified through support from the Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists. Data was collected by electronic survey, including application of the COVID-19 Yorkshire Rehabilitation Scale-modified (C19-YRSm). The C19-YRSm is a validated assessment tool for PCS and it's impact upon functional disability. This case series identifies that symptoms consistent with PCS are present in people with ID, post-COVID-19 infection. The risk of diagnostic overshadowing or misdiagnosis is high due to the subjective nature and the quality of PCS symptoms. People with ID who develop PCS may not be readily identified by clinical services and therefore not be accessing the specialist medical support required. Furthermore, changes in behaviour secondary to PCS may lead to unnecessary increased prescribing of psychotropic medication which in itself risks worsening dysphagia. Dysphagia could be an important bellwether to identify PCS in people with ID.

Prevalence and characteristics of dysphagia (including aspiration) in patients with parkinsonism is variable, depending on type of assessment, diagnosis, disease stage and duration. The aim of this study was to further evaluate dysphagia characteristics in patients with different types of parkinsonism with both instrumental (Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing, FEES) and non-instrumental (Timed Water Swallow Test, TWST) assessments. Swallowing characteristics in 74 patients with parkinsonism were prospectively assessed using FEES and TWST. Statistics employed were (a) Spearman rank correlation to measure correlation between dysphagia results and Parkinson subtypes, disease severity and duration and (b) the non-parametric tests Mann Whitney U and Kruskal Wallis to measure difference between groups. Dysphagia was common, with 50 (67.6%) of the patients demonstrating a mild-severe Dysphagia Outcome Severity Scale (DOSS, level 1-5). During FEES, 42% aspirated and 68% of these had silent aspiration. Aspiration was seen more frequently with increased disease severity as per Hoehn and Yahr (H&Y) (r = .459, p = < 0.001) and disease duration (r = .269, p = .021). Thin liquid (IDDSI level 0) was the most common consistency to aspirate, and the frequency of aspiration decreased with thicker liquids. Dysphagia and aspiration are common in all subgroups of parkinsonism and seen in early stages of H&Y and within the first year of disease duration. Hence, it is recommended that these patients are evaluated early for optimal management and to avoid aspiration-related complications.

The lack of early assessment tools for swallowing function in patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) may lead to delays in oral intake. This study assessed the effectiveness of a new bedside swallowing screening tool in detecting dysphagia in patients in the ICU or isolation settings, where isolation settings refer to conditions such as COVID-19, where patient mobility is limited. We assessed swallowing function in 13 patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. To ensure patient safety, a bedside preliminary investigation was performed to assess the patient's alertness level, and ultrasound findings of the vocal cords were obtained. Patients were nasogastric(NG) tube feeding or fasted if they did not meet a certain readiness level. Additionally, patients who passed the preliminary investigation underwent methylene blue dye or citric acid swallowing tests if they had or had not undergone tracheostomy, respectively. The Gugging Swallowing Screen (GUSS) test was used to determine whether an oral diet was appropriate. Of the 13 patients, 1 failed to meet the criteria during the preliminary examination, and 12 underwent the examination and initiated oral intake. Significant differences were found in the GUSS scores between the tracheostomy and non-tracheostomy groups but not in the examination validity. NG tube was implemented if the examination criteria were not met at each stage. Patients who passed the newly developed dysphagia screening tool exhibited no aspiration symptoms post-oral feeding initiation, enabling their discharge. In conclusion, the proposed screening test can be performed safely and easily, allowing for early dysphagia detection, reduced aspiration risk, and safe oral feeding in patients in the ICU or isolation settings.

Abnormalities in the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) in patients with achalasia and the impact of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) on the UES and esophageal body remain uncertain. To outline the prevalence and nature of UES abnormalities across different achalasia subtypes, as well as evaluate POEM's therapeutic efficacy on UES and esophageal body. A retrospective study of patients diagnosed with achalasia between January 2019 and December 2023 was conducted. POEM was performed on all patients, and preoperative and 6-month postoperative high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) data were obtained, along with the Eckardt symptom scores. A total of 64 patients (34 females, 30 males) who underwent POEM for achalasia (type I: 18, type II: 38, type III: 8) during the study period were included. Among the 64 patients, 42 (65.6%) exhibited abnormalities in the UES, as observed on HREM. The majority of those exhibiting abnormalities demonstrated impaired relaxation of the UES (46.9%), followed by a combination of hypertensive basal UES pressure (UESP) and impaired UES relaxation (12.5%). The dysphagia score and Eckardt score before POEM were significantly greater in the UES abnormality group than in the normal UES group (2.3 ± 0.7 vs. 1.9 ± 0.7, p = 0.040 and 6.2 ± 1.8 vs. 5.0 ± 1.6, p = 0.008, respectively). UESP and UES relaxation pressure (UESRP) decreased significantly following POEM across all types of achalasia (p < 0.05). All type I patients continued to exhibit no contractility after undergoing POEM. Pan-esophageal pressurization and spastic contractions were absent in patients with type II and type III achalasia following POEM. The high prevalence of UES abnormalities among patients with achalasia may serve as a compensatory mechanism. Patients with type II and III showed partial recovery of peristalsis following POEM.

Introduction: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is closely associated with resistant hypertension (RHTN). Individuals with OSA may have sensory and muscular alterations in pharyngolaryngeal structures, potentially resulting in oropharyngeal dysphagia.

Objective: One objective of this study was to assess and compare the quality of life (QoL) and swallowing ability of resistant hypertensive patients with and without OSA. Another objective was to evaluate the relationship between QoL and changes in swallowing in patients with RHTN and OSA.

Methods: This work was an analytical observational study with a cross-sectional design that included resistant hypertensive patients who were undergoing polysomnography (the gold standard exam for the diagnosis of OSA), fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES), dysphagia risk assessment (Eating Assessment Tool - EAT-10) and QoL assessment in swallowing (Swal-Qol).

Results: Of the 65 participants, 13 (20%) did not have OSA, 13 (20%) had mild OSA, 18 (27.7%) had moderate OSA, and 21 (32.2%) had severe OSA. Compared with those without OSA, patients with OSA had lower swallowing QoL scores ("burden", "symptoms", and "mental health"). Furthermore, pre premature leakage, onset of the pharyngeal phase in the pyriform sinus, laryngeal penetration, pharyngeal residue and oropharyngeal dysphagia were more prevalent among patients with OSA.

Conclusion: Resistant hypertensive patients with OSA have a greater prevalence of changes in swallowing and worse Swal-QoL scores than those without OSA, although such changes were not shown in the EAT-10. In addition, Swal-Qol is related to swallowing safety impairments among these individuals.

To evaluate the time of onset of dysphagia in a cohort of head and neck cancer patients treated with radiation or chemoradiation. Retrospective chart review of adult patients. 237 patients met inclusion criteria for the study. The average age at cancer diagnosis was 62 years (± 12.6) in a predominantly male cohort (n = 198, 83.5%). The most common subsite was oropharyngeal (n = 146, 60.8%) and squamous cell carcinoma in origin (n = 232, 97.9%). Of head and neck cancer patients diagnosed with new onset dysphagia or a dysphagia related diagnosis, nine (3.8%) were diagnosed at six months to 1 year, 12 (5.1%) at 1-2 years, and 17 (7.1%) at greater than 2 years. The mean radiation dose to the larynx was 43.8 Gy (Gy) (± 14.5) and statistically significant across time the periods (p = 0.018, η2 = 0.161). No difference was found between age, HPV status, T stage, smoking history, or tumor site. The majority of head and neck cancer patients treated with chemoradiation who developed dysphagia did so within the acute time period (during treatment and up to 6 months post treatment). However, a substantial proportion of patients also developed dysphagia in later time periods (16%). The incidence of dysphagia in certain time periods may be impacted by laryngeal radiation dose. Therefore, we recommend long term monitoring/screening of these patients so early intervention can occur.