首页 > 最新文献

Ejso最新文献

英文 中文
Reducing locoregional treatments in low risk early invasive breast cancer 减少低风险早期浸润性乳腺癌的局部治疗。
IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2026.111411
Shelley Potter , Mairead MacKenzie , Stuart McIntosh , Toral Gathani , Sileida Oliveros , David Dodwell
Improved outcomes, particularly the marked reduction in locoregional recurrence, and the increasing numbers of survivors of early breast cancer, have led to the wish to reduce treatment morbidity, without compromising long-term outcomes.
Trials to assess reduced breast and axillary surgery, radiotherapy and endocrine therapy have all been conducted and led to new standards of care and reduced toxicity.
In some cases, however, implementation of research findings has been compromised by a relative lack of quality control in trials, substitution of a de-escalated treatment by an alternative, a lack of patient-relevant endpoints and the difficulties in the design and powering of ‘non-inferiority’ trials.
We summarize the current landscape of care and clinical research in this area, explore the problems identified in some studies and suggest how they may be mitigated.
结果的改善,特别是局部复发的显著减少,以及早期乳腺癌幸存者人数的增加,使得人们希望在不影响长期结果的情况下降低治疗发病率。评估减少乳房和腋窝手术、放射治疗和内分泌治疗的试验都进行了,并产生了新的护理标准和降低毒性。然而,在某些情况下,研究结果的实施受到试验中相对缺乏质量控制、用替代疗法替代降级治疗、缺乏与患者相关的终点以及设计和支持“非劣效性”试验方面的困难的影响。我们总结了这一领域的护理和临床研究的现状,探讨了一些研究中发现的问题,并提出了如何减轻这些问题的建议。
{"title":"Reducing locoregional treatments in low risk early invasive breast cancer","authors":"Shelley Potter ,&nbsp;Mairead MacKenzie ,&nbsp;Stuart McIntosh ,&nbsp;Toral Gathani ,&nbsp;Sileida Oliveros ,&nbsp;David Dodwell","doi":"10.1016/j.ejso.2026.111411","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ejso.2026.111411","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Improved outcomes, particularly the marked reduction in locoregional recurrence, and the increasing numbers of survivors of early breast cancer, have led to the wish to reduce treatment morbidity, without compromising long-term outcomes.</div><div>Trials to assess reduced breast and axillary surgery, radiotherapy and endocrine therapy have all been conducted and led to new standards of care and reduced toxicity.</div><div>In some cases, however, implementation of research findings has been compromised by a relative lack of quality control in trials, substitution of a de-escalated treatment by an alternative, a lack of patient-relevant endpoints and the difficulties in the design and powering of ‘non-inferiority’ trials.</div><div>We summarize the current landscape of care and clinical research in this area, explore the problems identified in some studies and suggest how they may be mitigated.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11522,"journal":{"name":"Ejso","volume":"52 3","pages":"Article 111411"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146017740","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of contrast-enhanced mammography and breast MRI in tumour extent assessment: A systematic review and meta-analysis 对比增强乳房x线摄影和乳腺MRI在肿瘤范围评估中的比较:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析
IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2026.111410
Sven J.E. Ermans , Romy Maas , T. Martyn Hill , Sasha I. Usiskin , Lejla Alic , Michael Douek

Introduction

Accurate estimation of tumour extent is crucial for breast cancer treatment and achieving tumour-free surgical margins. Breast MRI is a widely used imaging modality; however, the high cost and limited availability of MRI have increased interest in contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) as a potential alternative. This meta-analysis compares the accuracy of tumour extent estimation between MRI and CEM, using histopathological size as the reference standard.

Method

Literature up to October 2024 was reviewed. Two independent reviewers extracted relevant data. For both modalities in comparison with pathology, mean differences in tumour size and pooled correlation coefficients were calculated. A direct comparison of tumour size estimates between both modalities was conducted using R2 and a two-sample t-test. The I2-statistic was used to assess between-study heterogeneity.

Results

Twenty-one studies involving 1060 patients were included. Both modalities showed a mean overestimation of tumour size by ∼3 mm, with no statistical significance (P = 0.345 and P = 0.308). Correlation coefficients with pathology were 0.78 for MRI and 0.79 for CEM. Direct comparison demonstrated strong agreement (R2 = 0.81) between the two modalities, and no significant difference (P = 0.65). Limited data suggested higher sensitivity but reduced specificity for MRI in the detection of multifocal/multicentric disease.

Conclusion

MRI and CEM showed comparable performance in tumour size estimation, with no significant differences compared to pathology or each other. These findings suggest CEM could potentially be an alternative for MRI, especially in resource-limited settings or for patients contraindicated for MRI. However, small study sizes and limited subgroup data highlight the need for large-scale prospective research.
准确估计肿瘤范围对乳腺癌治疗和实现无肿瘤手术切缘至关重要。乳房MRI是一种广泛使用的成像方式;然而,MRI的高成本和有限的可用性增加了对比增强乳房x光检查(CEM)作为潜在替代方案的兴趣。本荟萃分析比较了MRI和CEM之间肿瘤范围估计的准确性,使用组织病理大小作为参考标准。方法回顾截至2024年10月的文献。两名独立审稿人提取了相关数据。对于两种方式与病理比较,计算肿瘤大小和合并相关系数的平均差异。使用R2和双样本t检验对两种方式之间的肿瘤大小估计值进行直接比较。采用i2统计量评估研究间异质性。结果共纳入21项研究,1060例患者。两种方法均显示肿瘤大小平均高估约3mm,差异无统计学意义(P = 0.345和P = 0.308)。MRI与病理的相关系数为0.78,CEM为0.79。直接比较显示两种治疗方式之间具有很强的一致性(R2 = 0.81),无显著差异(P = 0.65)。有限的数据表明,MRI在检测多灶/多中心疾病时灵敏度较高,但特异性较低。结论mri和CEM对肿瘤大小的估计具有可比性,与病理或彼此之间无显著差异。这些发现表明CEM可能是MRI的替代方案,特别是在资源有限的环境中或对MRI有禁忌的患者。然而,较小的研究规模和有限的亚组数据突出了大规模前瞻性研究的必要性。
{"title":"Comparison of contrast-enhanced mammography and breast MRI in tumour extent assessment: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Sven J.E. Ermans ,&nbsp;Romy Maas ,&nbsp;T. Martyn Hill ,&nbsp;Sasha I. Usiskin ,&nbsp;Lejla Alic ,&nbsp;Michael Douek","doi":"10.1016/j.ejso.2026.111410","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ejso.2026.111410","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Accurate estimation of tumour extent is crucial for breast cancer treatment and achieving tumour-free surgical margins. Breast MRI is a widely used imaging modality; however, the high cost and limited availability of MRI have increased interest in contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) as a potential alternative. This meta-analysis compares the accuracy of tumour extent estimation between MRI and CEM, using histopathological size as the reference standard.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Literature up to October 2024 was reviewed. Two independent reviewers extracted relevant data. For both modalities in comparison with pathology, mean differences in tumour size and pooled correlation coefficients were calculated. A direct comparison of tumour size estimates between both modalities was conducted using R<sup>2</sup> and a two-sample <em>t</em>-test. The I<sup>2</sup>-statistic was used to assess between-study heterogeneity.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty-one studies involving 1060 patients were included. Both modalities showed a mean overestimation of tumour size by ∼3 mm, with no statistical significance (P = 0.345 and P = 0.308). Correlation coefficients with pathology were 0.78 for MRI and 0.79 for CEM. Direct comparison demonstrated strong agreement (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.81) between the two modalities, and no significant difference (P = 0.65). Limited data suggested higher sensitivity but reduced specificity for MRI in the detection of multifocal/multicentric disease.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>MRI and CEM showed comparable performance in tumour size estimation, with no significant differences compared to pathology or each other. These findings suggest CEM could potentially be an alternative for MRI, especially in resource-limited settings or for patients contraindicated for MRI. However, small study sizes and limited subgroup data highlight the need for large-scale prospective research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11522,"journal":{"name":"Ejso","volume":"52 3","pages":"Article 111410"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146024200","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Interpretable machine learning model for predicting postoperative complications in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma following neoadjuvant therapy and esophagectomy 预测食管鳞状细胞癌新辅助治疗和食管切除术后并发症的可解释机器学习模型
IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2026.111386
Chuanquan Lin , Xian Gong , Rui Tong , Shaojia Chen , Hao Chen , Guobing Xu , Bin Zheng , Chun Chen , Wei Zheng , Zhang Yang

Objectives

Postoperative complications remain common after neoadjuvant therapy and esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), and existing risk scores have limited bedside utility. We developed and validated an interpretable machine-learning model to predict morbidity.

Methods

We retrospectively included ESCC patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy and curative esophagectomy from 2018 to 2022. Cases from 2018 to 2021 were the training cohort; cases from 2022 were the validation cohort. The endpoint was Clavien–Dindo grade ≥ II complications within 90 days. Multimodal preoperative and intraoperative variables trained several machine-learning algorithms. Performance was evaluated by cross-validation and independent validation. Interpretability used SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), and top features yielded a simplified model.

Results

In total, 239 patients were analyzed in two temporally distinct cohorts (training set, n = 174; validation set, n = 65). XGBoost achieved the best overall performance, with accuracy 0.82, AUC 0.86, and precision 0.78. SHAP analysis identified prognostic nutritional index, smoking status, carcinoembryonic antigen, age, and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio as the most influential predictors. A simplified five-variable model preserved predictive performance and enabled clinically actionable risk stratification: in the low-risk group, 9.1 % experienced complications, compared with 23.8 % in the medium-risk group and 68.2 % in the high-risk group. Locked cutpoints—PNI 44.07, CEA 2.98 ng/mL, age 64.00 years, and LMR 3.22—were applied without modification in the validation cohort and yielded clear stratification of incidence across threshold-defined groups.

Conclusions

An interpretable machine-learning model based on routinely available clinical variables accurately predicts postoperative complications in ESCC after neoadjuvant therapy. The simplified model enables clinically meaningful risk stratification and may support personalized perioperative management.
目的食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)新辅助治疗和食管切除术后的术后并发症仍然很常见,现有的风险评分在临床应用上有限。我们开发并验证了一个可解释的机器学习模型来预测发病率。方法回顾性分析2018年至2022年接受新辅助治疗和根治性食管切除术的ESCC患者。2018 - 2021年的病例为培训组;2022年的病例为验证队列。终点是90天内Clavien-Dindo级≥II级并发症。多模态术前和术中变量训练了几种机器学习算法。通过交叉验证和独立验证对性能进行评价。可解释性采用SHapley加性解释(SHAP),顶部特征产生简化模型。结果239例患者被分为两个时间上不同的队列(训练组,n = 174;验证组,n = 65)。XGBoost获得了最佳的综合性能,精度为0.82,AUC为0.86,精密度为0.78。SHAP分析确定预后营养指数、吸烟状况、癌胚抗原、年龄和淋巴细胞/单核细胞比率是最具影响力的预测因素。简化的五变量模型保留了预测性能,并实现了临床可操作的风险分层:在低风险组中,9.1%的患者出现并发症,而中风险组为23.8%,高危组为68.2%。锁定的切点(pni 44.07, CEA 2.98 ng/mL,年龄64.00岁,LMR 3.22)在验证队列中不加修改地应用,并在阈值定义的组中获得了明确的发病率分层。结论基于常规临床变量的可解释性机器学习模型可准确预测ESCC新辅助治疗后并发症。简化的模型使临床有意义的风险分层,并可能支持个性化围手术期管理。
{"title":"Interpretable machine learning model for predicting postoperative complications in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma following neoadjuvant therapy and esophagectomy","authors":"Chuanquan Lin ,&nbsp;Xian Gong ,&nbsp;Rui Tong ,&nbsp;Shaojia Chen ,&nbsp;Hao Chen ,&nbsp;Guobing Xu ,&nbsp;Bin Zheng ,&nbsp;Chun Chen ,&nbsp;Wei Zheng ,&nbsp;Zhang Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.ejso.2026.111386","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ejso.2026.111386","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Postoperative complications remain common after neoadjuvant therapy and esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), and existing risk scores have limited bedside utility. We developed and validated an interpretable machine-learning model to predict morbidity.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively included ESCC patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy and curative esophagectomy from 2018 to 2022. Cases from 2018 to 2021 were the training cohort; cases from 2022 were the validation cohort. The endpoint was Clavien–Dindo grade ≥ II complications within 90 days. Multimodal preoperative and intraoperative variables trained several machine-learning algorithms. Performance was evaluated by cross-validation and independent validation. Interpretability used SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), and top features yielded a simplified model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 239 patients were analyzed in two temporally distinct cohorts (training set, n = 174; validation set, n = 65). XGBoost achieved the best overall performance, with accuracy 0.82, AUC 0.86, and precision 0.78. SHAP analysis identified prognostic nutritional index, smoking status, carcinoembryonic antigen, age, and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio as the most influential predictors. A simplified five-variable model preserved predictive performance and enabled clinically actionable risk stratification: in the low-risk group, 9.1 % experienced complications, compared with 23.8 % in the medium-risk group and 68.2 % in the high-risk group. Locked cutpoints—PNI 44.07, CEA 2.98 ng/mL, age 64.00 years, and LMR 3.22—were applied without modification in the validation cohort and yielded clear stratification of incidence across threshold-defined groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>An interpretable machine-learning model based on routinely available clinical variables accurately predicts postoperative complications in ESCC after neoadjuvant therapy. The simplified model enables clinically meaningful risk stratification and may support personalized perioperative management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11522,"journal":{"name":"Ejso","volume":"52 3","pages":"Article 111386"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146074766","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Transarterial chemoembolization combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors and anti-VEGF agents for intermediate HCC: a multicenter study 经动脉化疗栓塞联合免疫检查点抑制剂和抗vegf药物治疗中度HCC:一项多中心研究
IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2026.111407
Wei-Yi Jiang , Jin-Kai Feng , Bin Zhou , Si-Si Ren , Yu-Chao Hou , Fang-Fang Zhang , Yan-Jun Xiang , Zong-Han Liu , Rong-Chen Chen , Yun-Feng Shan , Chao Liang , Hong-Kun Zhou , Lin Gong , Shu-Qun Cheng

Purpose

To compare the clinical outcomes and safety profiles of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents alone versus transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with ICI and anti-VEGF agents in patients with intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

Patients were stratified into two groups: the triple-therapy (TACE combined with ICI and anti-VEGF agents) and dual-therapy groups (ICI plus anti-VEGF agents). Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (sIPTW) was applied to balance baseline characteristics. Study endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were employed to identify independent prognostic factors. Safety was evaluated per CTCAE v5.0.

Results

After sIPTW adjustment, the triple-therapy group demonstrated significantly longer median PFS (20.0 vs. 14.0 months; P < 0.0001) and median OS (26.0 vs. 19.0 months; P < 0.0001) compared to the dual-therapy group. Tumor response was also superior in the triple-therapy group, with higher ORR (63.3 % vs. 39.4 %; P = 0.015) and DCR (85.0 % vs. 60.6 %; P < 0.001). IPTW-weighted Cox regression identified AFP, tumor response, and up-to-7 criteria as independent prognostic factors for PFS, while AFP, up-to-7 criteria, and cirrhosis were independent factors for OS. The safety profile was manageable in both groups, with no new safety signals identified.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that combining TACE with ICIs and anti-VEGF agents significantly improves PFS, OS, ORR and DCR in intermediate-stage HCC patients compared to dual ICI and anti-VEGF agents therapy, with manageable toxicity.
目的比较免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)和抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)药物单独治疗与经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)联合ICI和抗VEGF药物治疗中重度肝癌(HCC)的临床疗效和安全性。方法将患者分为三组(TACE联合ICI和抗vegf药物)和双组(ICI +抗vegf药物)。采用稳定处理加权逆概率(sIPTW)来平衡基线特征。研究终点包括无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)、客观缓解率(ORR)和疾病控制率(DCR)。采用单因素和多因素Cox回归分析确定独立预后因素。按照CTCAE v5.0进行安全性评估。结果经sIPTW调整后,三联治疗组的中位PFS(20.0个月vs. 14.0个月;P < 0.0001)和中位OS(26.0个月vs. 19.0个月;P < 0.0001)明显长于双联治疗组。三联治疗组的肿瘤反应也更佳,ORR(63.3%比39.4%,P = 0.015)和DCR(85.0%比60.6%,P < 0.001)更高。iptw加权Cox回归发现,AFP、肿瘤反应和7级以上标准是PFS的独立预后因素,而AFP、7级以上标准和肝硬化是OS的独立预后因素。两组的安全状况都是可控的,没有发现新的安全信号。结论本研究表明,与ICI和抗vegf药物双药治疗相比,TACE联合ICIs和抗vegf药物治疗可显著改善中期HCC患者的PFS、OS、ORR和DCR,且毒性可控。
{"title":"Transarterial chemoembolization combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors and anti-VEGF agents for intermediate HCC: a multicenter study","authors":"Wei-Yi Jiang ,&nbsp;Jin-Kai Feng ,&nbsp;Bin Zhou ,&nbsp;Si-Si Ren ,&nbsp;Yu-Chao Hou ,&nbsp;Fang-Fang Zhang ,&nbsp;Yan-Jun Xiang ,&nbsp;Zong-Han Liu ,&nbsp;Rong-Chen Chen ,&nbsp;Yun-Feng Shan ,&nbsp;Chao Liang ,&nbsp;Hong-Kun Zhou ,&nbsp;Lin Gong ,&nbsp;Shu-Qun Cheng","doi":"10.1016/j.ejso.2026.111407","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ejso.2026.111407","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To compare the clinical outcomes and safety profiles of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents alone versus transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with ICI and anti-VEGF agents in patients with intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients were stratified into two groups: the triple-therapy (TACE combined with ICI and anti-VEGF agents) and dual-therapy groups (ICI plus anti-VEGF agents). Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (sIPTW) was applied to balance baseline characteristics. Study endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were employed to identify independent prognostic factors. Safety was evaluated per CTCAE v5.0.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After sIPTW adjustment, the triple-therapy group demonstrated significantly longer median PFS (20.0 vs. 14.0 months; P &lt; 0.0001) and median OS (26.0 vs. 19.0 months; P &lt; 0.0001) compared to the dual-therapy group. Tumor response was also superior in the triple-therapy group, with higher ORR (63.3 % vs. 39.4 %; P = 0.015) and DCR (85.0 % vs. 60.6 %; P &lt; 0.001). IPTW-weighted Cox regression identified AFP, tumor response, and up-to-7 criteria as independent prognostic factors for PFS, while AFP, up-to-7 criteria, and cirrhosis were independent factors for OS. The safety profile was manageable in both groups, with no new safety signals identified.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study demonstrates that combining TACE with ICIs and anti-VEGF agents significantly improves PFS, OS, ORR and DCR in intermediate-stage HCC patients compared to dual ICI and anti-VEGF agents therapy, with manageable toxicity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11522,"journal":{"name":"Ejso","volume":"52 3","pages":"Article 111407"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146024137","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Targeted axillary dissection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients with a high lymph node burden: Radiological and histological outcomes 淋巴结负担高的乳腺癌患者新辅助化疗后靶向腋窝清扫:影像学和组织学结果。
IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2026.111393
A. Nanda , E. Marshall , M. Attia , D. Alaradi , R. Merh , V. Sinnett , K. Krupa , M.K. Tasoulis , P.A. Barry , G. Gui , J.E. Rusby , R.L. O'Connell

Introduction

Axillary surgery in early breast cancer has evolved towards de-escalation, particularly for patients receiving neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NACT). Targeted axillary dissection (TAD), combining sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) with excision of a clipped metastatic node, reduces false-negative rates and may allow omission of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). However, evidence for its safety in patients with high lymph node burden (HLNB, ≥4 abnormal nodes) remains limited.

Methods

This retrospective study included women treated with TAD following NACT at The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (2018–2023). Patients were stratified by baseline nodal burden into low (LLNB, 1–3 nodes) and high (HLNB, ≥4 nodes) groups. Data on clinicopathological features, imaging-pathology concordance, surgical outcomes and oncological follow-up were analysed.

Results

Among 179 women (139 LLNB, 40 HLNB), HER2-positive and triple-negative subtypes were more frequent in the HLNB group. The clipped node contained a Magseed in 83.8 % of cases and was also a sentinel node in 71.3 %. Axillary pathological complete response (pCR) was achieved in 110/179 (61.4 %) patients - 61.2 % LLNB vs 62.5 % HLNB (p = 1.0). Of those with axillary pCR, 98.2 % avoided axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). End-of-treatment axillary ultrasound had a positive predictive value of 56.6 % and negative predictive value of 74.8 % for residual disease. At a median follow-up of 30 months, no axillary recurrences occurred; disease-free survival was comparable between groups (p = 0.32), with a non-significant trend toward poorer overall survival in HLNB (p = 0.055).

Conclusions

TAD after NACT appears oncologically safe in selected patients with both low and high nodal burden, enabling omission of ALND in most cases. Prospective studies are warranted to confirm its role in HLNB disease.
前言:早期乳腺癌的腋窝手术已经发展到降级,特别是对于接受新辅助全身治疗(NACT)的患者。靶向腋窝清扫(TAD),结合前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)和切除切除的转移性淋巴结,可以减少假阴性率,并可能遗漏腋窝淋巴结清扫(ALND)。然而,对于高淋巴结负担(HLNB,≥4个异常淋巴结)患者,其安全性的证据仍然有限。方法:本回顾性研究纳入了皇家马斯登NHS基金会信托(2018-2023)在NACT后接受TAD治疗的女性。根据基线淋巴结负担将患者分为低(LLNB, 1-3个淋巴结)组和高(HLNB,≥4个淋巴结)组。分析临床病理特征、影像学病理一致性、手术结果及肿瘤随访资料。结果:179例女性(139例LLNB, 40例HLNB)中,her2阳性和三阴性亚型在HLNB组中更为常见。在83.8%的病例中,夹夹的淋巴结包含Magseed,在71.3%的病例中,夹夹的淋巴结也是前哨淋巴结。110/179例(61.4%)患者实现腋窝病理完全缓解(pCR) - 61.2% LLNB vs 62.5% HLNB (p = 1.0)。在腋窝pCR患者中,98.2%的患者避免了腋窝淋巴结清扫(ALND)。治疗结束时腋窝超声对残留病变的阳性预测值为56.6%,阴性预测值为74.8%。中位随访30个月,无腋窝复发;两组间无病生存率具有可比性(p = 0.32), HLNB患者总生存率较差的趋势不显著(p = 0.055)。结论:在选择的低和高淋巴结负担患者中,NACT后的TAD在肿瘤上是安全的,在大多数情况下可以忽略ALND。有必要进行前瞻性研究以证实其在HLNB疾病中的作用。
{"title":"Targeted axillary dissection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients with a high lymph node burden: Radiological and histological outcomes","authors":"A. Nanda ,&nbsp;E. Marshall ,&nbsp;M. Attia ,&nbsp;D. Alaradi ,&nbsp;R. Merh ,&nbsp;V. Sinnett ,&nbsp;K. Krupa ,&nbsp;M.K. Tasoulis ,&nbsp;P.A. Barry ,&nbsp;G. Gui ,&nbsp;J.E. Rusby ,&nbsp;R.L. O'Connell","doi":"10.1016/j.ejso.2026.111393","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ejso.2026.111393","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Axillary surgery in early breast cancer has evolved towards de-escalation, particularly for patients receiving neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NACT). Targeted axillary dissection (TAD), combining sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) with excision of a clipped metastatic node, reduces false-negative rates and may allow omission of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). However, evidence for its safety in patients with high lymph node burden (HLNB, ≥4 abnormal nodes) remains limited.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study included women treated with TAD following NACT at The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (2018–2023). Patients were stratified by baseline nodal burden into low (LLNB, 1–3 nodes) and high (HLNB, ≥4 nodes) groups. Data on clinicopathological features, imaging-pathology concordance, surgical outcomes and oncological follow-up were analysed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 179 women (139 LLNB, 40 HLNB), HER2-positive and triple-negative subtypes were more frequent in the HLNB group. The clipped node contained a Magseed in 83.8 % of cases and was also a sentinel node in 71.3 %. Axillary pathological complete response (pCR) was achieved in 110/179 (61.4 %) patients - 61.2 % LLNB vs 62.5 % HLNB (p = 1.0). Of those with axillary pCR, 98.2 % avoided axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). End-of-treatment axillary ultrasound had a positive predictive value of 56.6 % and negative predictive value of 74.8 % for residual disease. At a median follow-up of 30 months, no axillary recurrences occurred; disease-free survival was comparable between groups (p = 0.32), with a non-significant trend toward poorer overall survival in HLNB (p = 0.055).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>TAD after NACT appears oncologically safe in selected patients with both low and high nodal burden, enabling omission of ALND in most cases. Prospective studies are warranted to confirm its role in HLNB disease.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11522,"journal":{"name":"Ejso","volume":"52 3","pages":"Article 111393"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145997634","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Primary pulmonary enteric adenocarcinoma: A single-institute retrospective study on its imaging classification and survival outcomes. 原发性肺肠腺癌:一项对其影像学分类和生存结果的单机构回顾性研究。
IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2026.111404
He Du, Wei Li, Jingyi Wang, Shixing Wu, Nan Song, Ziwei Wan, Jingyun Shi, Fengying Wu

Background: As an extremely rare independent pathological subtype of lung adenocarcinoma, PEAC exhibits potentially distinct clinicopathological, radiological, and molecular characteristics. Currently, there were no large-sample studies reporting its features.

Methods: Patients with PEAC who underwent surgical resection from March 2013 to December 2023 were included in the study. The clinicopathological, imaging features, radiological subtypes and recurrence patterns were analyzed. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves and compared between groups using log-rank tests. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess associations with outcomes.

Results: The final study population consisted of 81 patients (mean age, 63 years; age range, 36-79 years) including 60 men and 21 women. Radiologically, lesion subtypes were categorized as part-solid (6.2 %, 5/81), pure-solid (90.1 %, 73/81), and pneumonic-type PEAC (3.7 %, 3/81). Pneumonic-type PEACs were more prevalent in higher clinical T stages, whereas all part-solid PEACs were confined to the T1 stage (P = .001). In the part-solid subtype group, both RFS and OS rate were significantly higher than those in the pneumonic-type group and the pure-solid group (P = .001 and P = .0095). Tumor-node-metastasis(TNM) stage III emerged as an independent risk factor for recurrence (hazard ratio, 4.699 [95 % confidence interval: 1.967, 11.080]; P < .001). Pathological nodal involvement (hazard ratio, 24.301 [95 % confidence interval: 5.172, 114.195]; P < .001) was as independent predictor of poor OS. Intrapulmonary metastasis was identified as the predominant recurrence pattern in PEAC.

Conclusion: PEAC had distinct imaging characteristics. Survival outcomes vary significantly across different imaging subtypes, with prognosis largely determined by TNM stage.

背景:作为一种极其罕见的独立病理亚型肺腺癌,PEAC表现出潜在的独特的临床病理、放射学和分子特征。目前,尚无大样本研究报道其特征。方法:纳入2013年3月至2023年12月接受手术切除的PEAC患者。分析临床病理、影像学特征、影像学分型及复发方式。采用Kaplan-Meier曲线评估无复发生存期(RFS)和总生存期(OS),采用log-rank检验比较组间差异。Cox比例风险模型用于评估与结果的关联。结果:最终研究人群包括81例患者(平均年龄63岁,年龄范围36-79岁),其中男性60例,女性21例。影像学上病灶亚型分为部分实性(6.2%,5/81)、纯实性(90.1%,73/81)和肺炎型PEAC(3.7%, 3/81)。肺炎型PEACs在较高的临床T期更为普遍,而所有部分固体型PEACs仅限于T1期(P = .001)。部分固体亚型组的RFS和OS率均显著高于肺炎型组和纯固体组(P = 0.001和P = 0.0095)。肿瘤-淋巴结-转移(TNM) III期成为复发的独立危险因素(危险比为4.699[95%可信区间:1.967,11.080];P结论:PEAC具有明显的影像学特征。不同影像学亚型的生存结果差异很大,其预后主要取决于TNM分期。
{"title":"Primary pulmonary enteric adenocarcinoma: A single-institute retrospective study on its imaging classification and survival outcomes.","authors":"He Du, Wei Li, Jingyi Wang, Shixing Wu, Nan Song, Ziwei Wan, Jingyun Shi, Fengying Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.ejso.2026.111404","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2026.111404","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As an extremely rare independent pathological subtype of lung adenocarcinoma, PEAC exhibits potentially distinct clinicopathological, radiological, and molecular characteristics. Currently, there were no large-sample studies reporting its features.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with PEAC who underwent surgical resection from March 2013 to December 2023 were included in the study. The clinicopathological, imaging features, radiological subtypes and recurrence patterns were analyzed. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves and compared between groups using log-rank tests. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess associations with outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final study population consisted of 81 patients (mean age, 63 years; age range, 36-79 years) including 60 men and 21 women. Radiologically, lesion subtypes were categorized as part-solid (6.2 %, 5/81), pure-solid (90.1 %, 73/81), and pneumonic-type PEAC (3.7 %, 3/81). Pneumonic-type PEACs were more prevalent in higher clinical T stages, whereas all part-solid PEACs were confined to the T1 stage (P = .001). In the part-solid subtype group, both RFS and OS rate were significantly higher than those in the pneumonic-type group and the pure-solid group (P = .001 and P = .0095). Tumor-node-metastasis(TNM) stage III emerged as an independent risk factor for recurrence (hazard ratio, 4.699 [95 % confidence interval: 1.967, 11.080]; P < .001). Pathological nodal involvement (hazard ratio, 24.301 [95 % confidence interval: 5.172, 114.195]; P < .001) was as independent predictor of poor OS. Intrapulmonary metastasis was identified as the predominant recurrence pattern in PEAC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PEAC had distinct imaging characteristics. Survival outcomes vary significantly across different imaging subtypes, with prognosis largely determined by TNM stage.</p>","PeriodicalId":11522,"journal":{"name":"Ejso","volume":"52 3","pages":"111404"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146124211","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of health-related quality of life of cancer patients undergoing first and last follow-up after robotic surgery: A meta-analysis 机器人手术后第一次和最后一次随访癌症患者健康相关生活质量的比较:一项荟萃分析
IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2026.111405
Cuma Fidan

Background

The primary objective of this study is to compare health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of cancer patients undergoing first and last follow-up after robotic surgery (RS). The secondary objective of the study is to reveal effect of moderator variables on HRQoL of cancer patients after surgery.

Methods

Random effects model was used for meta-analysis, sensitivity, publication bias, meta-anova and meta-regression analyses. Threshold values have been calculated to evaluate clinical significance.

Results

13 studies were included in the meta-analysis (total of 2.399 cancer patients). Results of meta-analysis and sensitivity analysis show that cancer patients undergoing last follow-up after RS have better HRQoL than first follow-up. There is no publication bias. Results of meta-anova analysis show that (1) RS method has better HRQoL than other methods, (2) In gynaecologic cancers, cancer patients undergoing last follow-up after RS have better HRQoL than first follow-up, and (3) In cases where difference between last and first follow-up after RS is above or below 43, cancer patients undergoing last follow-up have better HRQoL than first follow-up. These results are both statistically and clinically significant.

Conclusion

RS treatment is effective in terms of HRQoL in cancer patients, both statistically and clinically. Therefore, RS treatment improves HRQoL of cancer patients. The results of this study could help surgeons develop patient-centred treatment strategies.
本研究的主要目的是比较机器人手术(RS)后接受首次和最后一次随访的癌症患者的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)。研究的次要目的是揭示调节变量对癌症患者术后HRQoL的影响。方法采用随机效应模型进行meta分析、敏感性分析、发表偏倚分析、meta方差分析和meta回归分析。计算阈值以评估临床意义。结果meta分析纳入13项研究(共计2.399例癌症患者)。meta分析和敏感性分析结果显示,RS后末次随访的癌症患者HRQoL优于第一次随访。没有发表偏倚。meta-anova分析结果显示:(1)RS法的HRQoL优于其他方法;(2)妇科肿瘤患者RS后末次随访的HRQoL优于第一次随访;(3)RS后末次随访与第一次随访的差值≥43时,末次随访的HRQoL优于第一次随访。这些结果具有统计学和临床意义。结论rs治疗对肿瘤患者的HRQoL有较好的疗效。因此,RS治疗提高了癌症患者的HRQoL。这项研究的结果可以帮助外科医生制定以患者为中心的治疗策略。
{"title":"Comparison of health-related quality of life of cancer patients undergoing first and last follow-up after robotic surgery: A meta-analysis","authors":"Cuma Fidan","doi":"10.1016/j.ejso.2026.111405","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ejso.2026.111405","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The primary objective of this study is to compare health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of cancer patients undergoing first and last follow-up after robotic surgery (RS). The secondary objective of the study is to reveal effect of moderator variables on HRQoL of cancer patients after surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Random effects model was used for meta-analysis, sensitivity, publication bias, meta-anova and meta-regression analyses. Threshold values have been calculated to evaluate clinical significance.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>13 studies were included in the meta-analysis (total of 2.399 cancer patients). Results of meta-analysis and sensitivity analysis show that cancer patients undergoing last follow-up after RS have better HRQoL than first follow-up. There is no publication bias. Results of meta-anova analysis show that (1) RS method has better HRQoL than other methods, (2) In gynaecologic cancers, cancer patients undergoing last follow-up after RS have better HRQoL than first follow-up, and (3) In cases where difference between last and first follow-up after RS is above or below 43, cancer patients undergoing last follow-up have better HRQoL than first follow-up. These results are both statistically and clinically significant.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>RS treatment is effective in terms of HRQoL in cancer patients, both statistically and clinically. Therefore, RS treatment improves HRQoL of cancer patients. The results of this study could help surgeons develop patient-centred treatment strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11522,"journal":{"name":"Ejso","volume":"52 3","pages":"Article 111405"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145975081","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Virtual patient modeling for generative-AI-assisted treatment decision-making in lymphedema care: AI tends to favor more aggressive treatment 人工智能辅助淋巴水肿治疗决策的虚拟患者建模:人工智能倾向于更积极的治疗。
IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2026.111391
Yuki Tsujimoto , Makoto Shiraishi , Hiroki Yamanaka , Haesu Lee , Mutsumi Okazaki , Naoki Morimoto

Background

The rapid advancement of generative artificial intelligence (gen-AI) has prompted interest in whether it can recognize and respond to individual clinical backgrounds in treatment decision-making. To explore this, we developed a virtual patient model for lymphedema and conducted an observational study to examine what treatments AI would recommend, whether the recommendations were individualized, and what tendencies the AI exhibited.

Methods

A virtual cohort of 100 patients with secondary upper extremity lymphedema following breast cancer surgery was constructed using generative pre-trained transformer-4 omni (GPT-4o). For each virtual patient, six clinical questions, based on the Japanese Lymphedema Guidelines 2024, were submitted to the AI to elicit individualized recommendations. The answers obtained were compared with guidelines-defined recommendation levels to assess concordance, deviation, and treatment tendencies, analyzed by patient factors.

Results

Multivariate analysis demonstrated that GPT-4o-generated recommendations were tailored to individual patient characteristics. They showed high concordance with guideline-defined recommendations for conservative care but greater variability and bias toward invasive options in surgical contexts.

Conclusion

The preference of gen-AI for invasive treatments may reflect an overestimation of the benefits of performing treatments rather than withholding them, especially in invasive treatments. This bias shows a limitation of current gen-AI in complex decisions. Our reproducible simulation framework identified this bias and variability, clarifying both strengths and limitations of gen-AI. This type of AI-on-AI observational study may help improve the accuracy of AI and support its future role in clinical care.
背景:生成式人工智能(gen-AI)的快速发展引起了人们对其能否在治疗决策中识别和响应个体临床背景的兴趣。为了探索这一点,我们开发了一个淋巴水肿的虚拟患者模型,并进行了一项观察性研究,以检查AI会推荐什么治疗方法,这些建议是否个体化,以及AI表现出什么倾向。方法:使用生成式预训练变压器-4 omni (gpt - 40)构建100例乳腺癌手术后继发上肢淋巴水肿患者的虚拟队列。对于每个虚拟患者,根据日本淋巴水肿指南2024,将六个临床问题提交给人工智能,以引出个性化建议。将得到的答案与指南定义的推荐水平进行比较,以评估一致性、偏差和治疗倾向,并根据患者因素进行分析。结果:多变量分析表明,gpt - 40产生的建议是针对个体患者的特征量身定制的。它们与指南定义的保守治疗建议高度一致,但在手术环境下更大的变异性和偏向于侵入性选择。结论:gen-AI对侵入性治疗的偏好可能反映了对进行治疗而不是不进行治疗的益处的高估,特别是在侵入性治疗中。这种偏见显示了当前gen-AI在复杂决策中的局限性。我们的可重复模拟框架确定了这种偏差和可变性,阐明了gen-AI的优势和局限性。这种人工智能对人工智能的观察性研究可能有助于提高人工智能的准确性,并支持其未来在临床护理中的作用。
{"title":"Virtual patient modeling for generative-AI-assisted treatment decision-making in lymphedema care: AI tends to favor more aggressive treatment","authors":"Yuki Tsujimoto ,&nbsp;Makoto Shiraishi ,&nbsp;Hiroki Yamanaka ,&nbsp;Haesu Lee ,&nbsp;Mutsumi Okazaki ,&nbsp;Naoki Morimoto","doi":"10.1016/j.ejso.2026.111391","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ejso.2026.111391","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The rapid advancement of generative artificial intelligence (gen-AI) has prompted interest in whether it can recognize and respond to individual clinical backgrounds in treatment decision-making. To explore this, we developed a virtual patient model for lymphedema and conducted an observational study to examine what treatments AI would recommend, whether the recommendations were individualized, and what tendencies the AI exhibited.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A virtual cohort of 100 patients with secondary upper extremity lymphedema following breast cancer surgery was constructed using generative pre-trained transformer-4 omni (GPT-4o). For each virtual patient, six clinical questions, based on the Japanese Lymphedema Guidelines 2024, were submitted to the AI to elicit individualized recommendations. The answers obtained were compared with guidelines-defined recommendation levels to assess concordance, deviation, and treatment tendencies, analyzed by patient factors.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Multivariate analysis demonstrated that GPT-4o-generated recommendations were tailored to individual patient characteristics. They showed high concordance with guideline-defined recommendations for conservative care but greater variability and bias toward invasive options in surgical contexts.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The preference of gen-AI for invasive treatments may reflect an overestimation of the benefits of performing treatments rather than withholding them, especially in invasive treatments. This bias shows a limitation of current gen-AI in complex decisions. Our reproducible simulation framework identified this bias and variability, clarifying both strengths and limitations of gen-AI. This type of AI-on-AI observational study may help improve the accuracy of AI and support its future role in clinical care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11522,"journal":{"name":"Ejso","volume":"52 3","pages":"Article 111391"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146017786","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Colonization of bile with gammaproteobacteria is associated with reduced survival after surgery for pancreatic cancer in patients receiving gemcitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy 在接受吉西他滨辅助化疗的胰腺癌患者手术后,胆汁中γ变形杆菌的定植与生存率降低有关。
IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2026.111396
Charlotte E. Terry, James M. Halle-Smith, Nabeel Merali, Ravi Marudanayagam, Nikolaos Chatzizacharias, Bobby V.M. Dasari, David C. Bartlett, Syed S. Raza, Adam E. Frampton, Robert P. Sutcliffe, Keith J. Roberts

Background

Evidence suggests that the biliary microbiome influences the progression of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in patients undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy. Specifically, Gammaproteobacteria (GPB) has been shown to have the potential to develop mutations which can metabolise gemcitabine into an inactive form. This study hypothesised that GPB influences survival in patients with PDAC undergoing adjuvant gemcitabine-based chemotherapy following surgery.

Methods

This was a retrospective study of patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy from 2010 to 2020. Associations between patient and tumour characteristics, survival data, and results of intraoperative bile cultures (GPB + or GPB-) were investigated. Analysis of patients matched by chemotherapy regimen and numbers of cycles of adjuvant therapy was also performed. Survival was analysed using Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox regression analysis.

Results

Analysis of 313 patients revealed that adjuvant gemcitabine-based therapy improved overall survival (OS). Patients who receive gemcitabine-based chemotherapy with a GPB + biliary culture had a shorter OS compared to those who were GPB-, and a median survival of 17.9 vs 26.2 months, P = 0.002. After matching for key chemotherapy variables, survival was greater in the GPB- group 26.8 vs 19.8 months, P = 0.016. This association was not seen among patients who received no adjuvant therapy or non-gemcitabine based therapy.

Conclusion

Patients receiving gemcitabine-based chemotherapy after surgery are likely to have reduction in OS if they have a biliary culture positive for GPB.
背景:有证据表明,胆道微生物组影响接受辅助化疗的胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)患者的进展。具体来说,伽马变形菌(GPB)已被证明具有发生突变的潜力,可以将吉西他滨代谢成非活性形式。本研究假设GPB会影响术后接受吉西他滨辅助化疗的PDAC患者的生存。方法:回顾性研究2010年至2020年接受胰十二指肠切除术的患者。研究了患者与肿瘤特征、生存数据和术中胆汁培养结果(GPB +或GPB-)之间的关系。分析了与化疗方案和辅助治疗周期相匹配的患者。生存率采用Kaplan-Meier曲线和Cox回归分析。结果:对313例患者的分析显示,基于吉西他滨的辅助治疗提高了总生存期(OS)。接受吉西他滨化疗并胆道培养GPB +的患者比GPB-的患者有更短的OS,中位生存期为17.9个月vs 26.2个月,P = 0.002。在对关键化疗变量进行匹配后,GPB-组的生存时间更长,分别为26.8个月和19.8个月,P = 0.016。在未接受辅助治疗或非吉西他滨治疗的患者中未见这种关联。结论:术后接受吉西他滨化疗的患者,如果胆道GPB培养阳性,OS可能会降低。
{"title":"Colonization of bile with gammaproteobacteria is associated with reduced survival after surgery for pancreatic cancer in patients receiving gemcitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy","authors":"Charlotte E. Terry,&nbsp;James M. Halle-Smith,&nbsp;Nabeel Merali,&nbsp;Ravi Marudanayagam,&nbsp;Nikolaos Chatzizacharias,&nbsp;Bobby V.M. Dasari,&nbsp;David C. Bartlett,&nbsp;Syed S. Raza,&nbsp;Adam E. Frampton,&nbsp;Robert P. Sutcliffe,&nbsp;Keith J. Roberts","doi":"10.1016/j.ejso.2026.111396","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ejso.2026.111396","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Evidence suggests that the biliary microbiome influences the progression of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in patients undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy. Specifically, <em>Gammaproteobacteria (GPB)</em> has been shown to have the potential to develop mutations which can metabolise gemcitabine into an inactive form. This study hypothesised that GPB influences survival in patients with PDAC undergoing adjuvant gemcitabine-based chemotherapy following surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a retrospective study of patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy from 2010 to 2020. Associations between patient and tumour characteristics, survival data, and results of intraoperative bile cultures (GPB + or GPB-) were investigated. Analysis of patients matched by chemotherapy regimen and numbers of cycles of adjuvant therapy was also performed. Survival was analysed using Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox regression analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Analysis of 313 patients revealed that adjuvant gemcitabine-based therapy improved overall survival (OS). Patients who receive gemcitabine-based chemotherapy with a GPB + biliary culture had a shorter OS compared to those who were GPB-, and a median survival of 17.9 vs 26.2 months, P = 0.002. After matching for key chemotherapy variables, survival was greater in the GPB- group 26.8 vs 19.8 months, P = 0.016. This association was not seen among patients who received no adjuvant therapy or non-gemcitabine based therapy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Patients receiving gemcitabine-based chemotherapy after surgery are likely to have reduction in OS if they have a biliary culture positive for GPB.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11522,"journal":{"name":"Ejso","volume":"52 3","pages":"Article 111396"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146017190","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Surgical complications after therapeutic lymph node dissection in stage III–IV melanoma: impact of neoadjuvant immunotherapy III-IV期黑色素瘤治疗性淋巴结清扫后的手术并发症:新辅助免疫治疗的影响
IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2026.111403
Julia V.C. Lytchiér , Melis I. Okur , Wiktor Rutkowski , Hildur Helgadottir , Alberto Falk Delgado

Introduction

Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have recently entered clinical practice in management of melanoma, yet its impact on surgical outcomes remains unclear.
This study evaluated the influence of neoadjuvant ICI on postoperative complications, surgical metrics, adjuvant treatment delay and survival in patients with stage III-IV melanoma following therapeutic lymph node dissections.

Material and methods

This retrospective cohort included patients that underwent surgery for nodal recurrence between 2019 and 2024. Patient characteristics, adverse events of ICI, surgical metrics, postoperative complications, postponement of adjuvant therapy, number of outpatient visits as well as survival were analyzed.

Results

81 patients were included, 19 patients received anti-PD-1 monotherapy followed by surgery and 62 patients underwent upfront surgery. Surgical duration was longer in the neoadjuvant group (p < 0.001), regardless of site and lymph nodes removed. Complications were observed in 63.2 % in neoadjuvant patients vs. 80.6 % in upfront patients (p = 0.13). The number of nurse outpatient visits was higher for neoadjuvant patients (p = 0.02) and increased with the number of removed lymph nodes (p = 0.05). The neoadjuvant patients started adjuvant therapy at median 6.0 weeks after surgery compared to 9.1 weeks in upfront (p < 0.001). At one year the overall survival was 100 % (95 % CI 100 - 100 %) in the neoadjuvant group and 90.3 % (95 % CI 83.3–98.0 %) in upfront surgery (P = 0.04).

Conclusion

Neoadjuvant ICI did not increase postoperative complications. It was associated with prolonged surgical duration and increased follow-up visits, but also shorter time until starting adjuvant treatment.
新辅助免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)最近已进入黑色素瘤治疗的临床实践,但其对手术结果的影响尚不清楚。本研究评估了新辅助ICI对治疗性淋巴结清扫后III-IV期黑色素瘤患者术后并发症、手术指标、辅助治疗延迟和生存的影响。材料和方法本回顾性队列包括2019年至2024年间因淋巴结复发接受手术的患者。分析患者特征、ICI不良事件、手术指标、术后并发症、辅助治疗延期、门诊就诊次数和生存率。结果共纳入81例患者,其中19例接受抗pd -1单药后手术治疗,62例接受术前手术治疗。无论切除部位和淋巴结如何,新辅助组的手术时间更长(p < 0.001)。新辅助组的并发症发生率为63.2%,而术前组为80.6% (p = 0.13)。新辅助患者的护士门诊次数较高(p = 0.02),且随淋巴结切除数的增加而增加(p = 0.05)。新辅助患者在手术后中位6.0周开始辅助治疗,而术前为9.1周(p < 0.001)。一年时,新辅助组的总生存率为100% (95% CI 100 - 100%),而术前组的总生存率为90.3% (95% CI 83.3 - 98.0%) (P = 0.04)。结论新辅助ICI未增加术后并发症。它与手术时间延长和随访次数增加有关,但也与开始辅助治疗的时间缩短有关。
{"title":"Surgical complications after therapeutic lymph node dissection in stage III–IV melanoma: impact of neoadjuvant immunotherapy","authors":"Julia V.C. Lytchiér ,&nbsp;Melis I. Okur ,&nbsp;Wiktor Rutkowski ,&nbsp;Hildur Helgadottir ,&nbsp;Alberto Falk Delgado","doi":"10.1016/j.ejso.2026.111403","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ejso.2026.111403","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have recently entered clinical practice in management of melanoma, yet its impact on surgical outcomes remains unclear.</div><div>This study evaluated the influence of neoadjuvant ICI on postoperative complications, surgical metrics, adjuvant treatment delay and survival in patients with stage III-IV melanoma following therapeutic lymph node dissections.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>This retrospective cohort included patients that underwent surgery for nodal recurrence between 2019 and 2024. Patient characteristics, adverse events of ICI, surgical metrics, postoperative complications, postponement of adjuvant therapy, number of outpatient visits as well as survival were analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>81 patients were included, 19 patients received anti-PD-1 monotherapy followed by surgery and 62 patients underwent upfront surgery. Surgical duration was longer in the neoadjuvant group (p &lt; 0.001), regardless of site and lymph nodes removed. Complications were observed in 63.2 % in neoadjuvant patients vs. 80.6 % in upfront patients (p = 0.13). The number of nurse outpatient visits was higher for neoadjuvant patients (p = 0.02) and increased with the number of removed lymph nodes (p = 0.05). The neoadjuvant patients started adjuvant therapy at median 6.0 weeks after surgery compared to 9.1 weeks in upfront (p &lt; 0.001). At one year the overall survival was 100 % (95 % CI 100 - 100 %) in the neoadjuvant group and 90.3 % (95 % CI 83.3–98.0 %) in upfront surgery (P = 0.04).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Neoadjuvant ICI did not increase postoperative complications. It was associated with prolonged surgical duration and increased follow-up visits, but also shorter time until starting adjuvant treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11522,"journal":{"name":"Ejso","volume":"52 3","pages":"Article 111403"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146024138","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Ejso
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1