Introduction
Resection plays a pivotal role in the treatment of rectal cancer. The aim of this study is to compare the long-term outcomes of laparoscopic, open surgical and robotic approaches.
Material and methods
The study cohort contains data of 24,725 patients with rectal cancer and curative surgery between 2010 and 2022 from a pooled database of cancer registries of ten German federal states. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes were cumulative loco-regional recurrence (CLR) and recurrence free survival (RFS) calculated via univariable and multivariable analyses, and matched-pair analyses.
Results
Of the 24,725 patients, 12,561 (50.8 %) were treated with open, 11,248 (45.5 %) with laparoscopic and 916 patients (3.7 %) with robotic-assisted resections. In multivariable Cox regression analysis, OS was higher in the minimal invasive surgery groups compared to the open surgery group with a HR of 0.775 (p < 0.001) for the laparoscopic and HR of 0.768 (p = 0.006) for the robotic group. A comparison of robotic to open surgery regarding RFS showed a significant difference in favor of robotic surgery in multivariable Cox regression (HR 0.834, p = 0.046). The rate of CLR was lower in the robotic compared to the laparoscopic surgery group. Additionally, we found a lower conversion rate in the robotic group as compared to the laparoscopic group.
Conclusion
These findings from real-life data confirm current recommendations for minimal invasive rectal resection. There was a trend towards better outcomes after robotic compared to laparoscopic surgery. However, further studies are needed to investigate this issue and to provide definitive evidence.
扫码关注我们
求助内容:
应助结果提醒方式:
