Emergency Medicine Journal最新文献

There are approximately 180 000 deaths per year from thermal burn injury worldwide. Most burn injuries can be treated in local hospitals but 6.5% require specialist burn care. The initial ED assessment, resuscitation and critical care of the severely burned patient present significant challenges and require a multidisciplinary approach. The management of these patients in the resuscitation room impacts on the effectiveness of continuing care in the intensive care unit. The scope of the present practice review is the immediate management of the adult patient with severe burns, including inhalation injury and burn shock. The article uses an illustrative case to highlight recent developments including advanced airway management and the contemporary approach to assessment of fluid requirements and the type and volume of fluid resuscitation. There is discussion on new options for pain relief in the ED and the principles governing the early stages of burn intensive care. It does not discuss minor injuries, mass casualty events, chemical or radiation injuries, exfoliative or necrotising conditions or frost bite.

Background: Ultrasound-guided (USG) erector-spinae plane block (ESPB) may be better than intravenous opioids in treating acute hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB) pain in the ED.

Methods: This open-label randomised controlled trial was conducted in the ED of a tertiary-care hospital between March and August 2023. All adult patients with severe HPB pain were recruited during times that a primary investigator was present. Unconsenting patients, numeric rating scale (NRS) ≤6, age ≤18 and ≥80 years, pregnant, unstable or with allergies to local anaesthetics or opioids were excluded. Patients in the intervention arm received bilateral USG ESPB with 0.2% ropivacaine at T7 level, by a trained ED consultant, and those in the control arm received 0.1 mg/kg intravenous morphine. Pain on a 10-point NRS was assessed by the investigators at presentation and at 1, 3, 5 and 10 hours after intervention by the treatment team, along with rescue analgesia requirements and patient satisfaction. Difference in NRS was analysed using analysis of co-variance (ANCOVA) and t-tests.

Results: 70 participants were enrolled, 35 in each arm. Mean age was 40.4±13.2 years, mean NRS at presentation in the intervention arm was 8.0±0.9 and 7.6±0.6 in the control arm. NRS at 1 hour was significantly lower in the ESPB group (ANCOVA p<0.001). At 1, 3, 5 and 10 hours, reduction of NRS in the intervention arm (7±1.6, 6.7±1.9, 6.6±1.8, 6.1±1.9) was significantly greater than the control arm (4.4±2, 4.6±1.8, 3.7±2.2, 3.8±1.8) (t-test, p<0.001). Fewer patients receiving ESPB required rescue analgesia at 5 (t-test, p=0.031) and 10 hours (t-test, p=0.04). More patients were 'very satisfied' with ESPB compared with receiving only morphine at each time period (p<0.001).

Conclusion: ESPB is a promising alternative to morphine in those with HPB pain.

Trial registration number: CTRI/2023/03/050595.

A shortcut review of the literature was conducted to examine whether administering a sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) block provides symptomatic relief in adult patients with acute migraine. 381 papers were found of which 4 included data on patients relevant to the specific clinical question, these are discussed in the paper. The author, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes, results and study weaknesses of the best papers are tabulated. The clinical bottom line is that to date there is not enough evidence that a SPG block is likely to provide sustained symptomatic relief of acute migraine in the emergency setting. Further work is needed to establish if it can provide benefit for this patient group.

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted image interpretation is a fast-developing area of clinical innovation. Most research to date has focused on the performance of AI-assisted algorithms in comparison with that of radiologists rather than evaluating the algorithms' impact on the clinicians who often undertake initial image interpretation in routine clinical practice. This study assessed the impact of AI-assisted image interpretation on the diagnostic performance of frontline acute care clinicians for the detection of pneumothoraces (PTX).

Methods: A multicentre blinded multi-case multi-reader study was conducted between October 2021 and January 2022. The online study recruited 18 clinician readers from six different clinical specialties, with differing levels of seniority, across four English hospitals. The study included 395 plain CXR images, 189 positive for PTX and 206 negative. The reference standard was the consensus opinion of two thoracic radiologists with a third acting as arbitrator. General Electric Healthcare Critical Care Suite (GEHC CCS) PTX algorithm was applied to the final dataset. Readers individually interpreted the dataset without AI assistance, recording the presence or absence of a PTX and a confidence rating. Following a 'washout' period, this process was repeated including the AI output.

Results: Analysis of the performance of the algorithm for detecting or ruling out a PTX revealed an overall AUROC of 0.939. Overall reader sensitivity increased by 11.4% (95% CI 4.8, 18.0, p=0.002) from 66.8% (95% CI 57.3, 76.2) unaided to 78.1% aided (95% CI 72.2, 84.0, p=0.002), specificity 93.9% (95% CI 90.9, 97.0) without AI to 95.8% (95% CI 93.7, 97.9, p=0.247). The junior reader subgroup showed the largest improvement at 21.7% (95% CI 10.9, 32.6), increasing from 56.0% (95% CI 37.7, 74.3) to 77.7% (95% CI 65.8, 89.7, p<0.01).

Conclusion: The study indicates that AI-assisted image interpretation significantly enhances the diagnostic accuracy of clinicians in detecting PTX, particularly benefiting less experienced practitioners. While overall interpretation time remained unchanged, the use of AI improved diagnostic confidence and sensitivity, especially among junior clinicians. These findings underscore the potential of AI to support less skilled clinicians in acute care settings.

Background: The number of asylum seekers awaiting decisions on their claims in the UK has more than tripled since 2014. How we meet international obligations to provide appropriate healthcare to asylum seekers and refugees (ASRs) is therefore an increasingly important issue. The views of frontline healthcare workers are vital to ensure the development of sustainable and effective health policy when it comes to caring for this group.

Method: A single-centre qualitative study in the form of semistructured interviews was conducted at the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital ED in Glasgow, Scotland, between January and March 2023. Volunteering ED care providers (EDCPs)-doctors and nurses-working in the ED were interviewed and the data analysed and presented through a thematic analytical framework.

Results: 12 semistructured interviews were conducted-6 doctors and 6 nurses. Analysis revealed four themes: (1) 'staff attitudes' highlighted in particular the positive views of the participants in providing care for ASRs; (2) 'presentation patterns' revealed significant variations in opinion, with one-third of participants, for example, believing there was no difference in presentations compared with the general population; (3) 'challenges to optimal care' outlines multiple subthemes which impact care including the unique challenge of the ED triage system; and (4) 'transition in care' discusses participant concerns regarding arranging safe and appropriate follow-up for ASR patients. Ethical dilemmas in providing care, as highlighted in previous studies, did not feature heavily in discussions in this study.

Conclusion: This study provides an insight into the views of EDCPs in providing care to ASRs in the ED. Study findings can potentially contribute to the development of ED-specific guidelines as well as inform wider health policy and provide a focus and direction for further research.

Background: Forearm fractures are a common ED presentation. This study aimed to compare the resource utilisation of three anaesthetic techniques used for closed forearm fracture reduction in the ED: haematoma block (HB), Bier's block (BB) and procedural sedation (PS).

Methods: A retrospective multicentre cohort study was conducted of adult patients presenting to either Port Macquarie Base Hospital ED or Kempsey District Hospital ED in New South Wales, Australia, from January 2018 to June 2021. Patients requiring a closed reduction in the ED were included. ED length of stay (LOS) was compared using a likelihood ratio test. Successful reduction on the first attempt and the number of ED specialists present for each method were both modelled with a linear regression. Staff utilisation by the level of training, cost of consumables and complications for each group were presented as descriptive statistics.

Results: A total of 226 forearm fractures were included. 84 used HB, 35 BB and 107 PS. The mean ED LOS was lowest for HB (187.7 min) compared with BB (227.2 min) and PS (239.3 min) (p=0.023). The number of ED specialists required for PS was higher when compared with HB and BB (p=0.001). The cost of consumables and a total number of staff were considerably lower for HB compared with PS and BB methods. PS had the highest proportion of successful reductions on the first attempt (94.4%) compared with BB (88.6%) and HB (76.2%) (p=0.006). More patients experienced complications from PS (17.8%) compared with BB (14.3%) and HB (13.1%).

Conclusions: In this study, the HB method was the most efficient as it was associated with a shorter ED LOS, lower cost and staff resource utilisation. Although PS had a significantly greater proportion of successful reductions on the first attempt, HB had fewer complications than BB and PS. EDs with limited resources should consider using HB or BB as the initial technique for fracture reduction with PS used for failed HB or when regional blocks are contraindicated.