Pub Date : 2024-11-21DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2023-213700
Joseph Carpenter, Umedjon Ibragimov, Alaina Steck, Tatiana Getz, Yan Li, Nicholas Giordano
{"title":"Implementing peer recovery coaches to increase linkages to recovery services among patients with substance use disorders seen in emergency departments.","authors":"Joseph Carpenter, Umedjon Ibragimov, Alaina Steck, Tatiana Getz, Yan Li, Nicholas Giordano","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2023-213700","DOIUrl":"10.1136/emermed-2023-213700","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"757-758"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11581905/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142105487","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-21DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2021-212230
Alan Watkins, Jenna Katherine Jones, Khalid Ali, Richard Dewar, Adrian Edwards, Bridie Angela Evans, Lyn Evans, Gary A Ford, Chelsey Hampton, Roger John, Charlene Jones, Chris Moore, Michael Obiako, Alison Porter, Alan Pryce, Tom Quinn, Anne C Seagrove, Helen Snooks, Shirley Whitman, Nigel Rees
Background: Early assessment of patients with suspected transient ischaemic attack (TIA) is crucial to provision of effective care, including initiation of preventive therapies and identification of stroke mimics. Many patients with TIA present to emergency medical services (EMS) but may not require hospitalisation. Paramedics could identify and refer patients with low-risk TIA, without conveyance to the ED. Safety and effectiveness of this model is unknown.
Aim: To assess the feasibility of undertaking a fully powered randomised controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate clinical and cost-effectiveness of paramedic referral of patients who call EMS with low-risk TIA to TIA clinic, avoiding transfer to ED.
Methods: The Transient Ischaemic attack Emergency Referral (TIER) intervention was developed through a survey of UK ambulance services, a scoping review of evidence of prehospital care of TIA and convening a specialist clinical panel to agree its final form. Paramedics in South Wales, UK, were randomly allocated to trial intervention (TIA clinic referral) or control (usual care) arms, with patients' allocation determined by that of attending paramedics.Predetermined progression criteria considered: proportion of patients referred to TIA clinic, data retrieval, patient satisfaction and potential cost-effectiveness.
Results: From December 2016 to September 2017, eighty-nine paramedics recruited 53 patients (36 intervention; 17 control); 48 patients (31 intervention; 17 control) consented to follow-up via routine data. Three intervention patients, of seven deemed eligible, were referred to TIA clinic by paramedics. Contraindications recorded for the other intervention arm patients were: Face/Arms/Speech/Time positive (n=13); ABCD2 score >3 (n=5); already anticoagulated (n=2); crescendo TIA (n=1); other (n=8). Routinely collected electronic health records, used to report further healthcare contacts, were obtained for all consenting patients. Patient-reported satisfaction with care was higher in the intervention arm (mean 4.8/5) than the control arm (mean 4.2/5). Health economic analysis suggests an intervention arm quality-adjusted life-year loss of 0.0094 (95% CI -0.0371, 0.0183), p=0.475.
Conclusion: The TIER feasibility study did not meet its progression criteria, largely due to low patient identification and referral rates. A fully powered RCT in this setting is not recommended.
Trial registration number: ISRCTN85516498.
背景:对疑似短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)患者进行早期评估对于提供有效护理至关重要,包括启动预防性疗法和识别卒中模拟物。许多 TIA 患者向急诊医疗服务(EMS)求助,但可能不需要住院治疗。辅助医务人员可识别并转诊低风险 TIA 患者,而无需将其送至急诊室。这种模式的安全性和有效性尚不清楚。目的:评估开展一项完全有效的随机对照试验(RCT)的可行性,以评估辅助医务人员将拨打急救电话的低风险 TIA 患者转诊至 TIA 诊所、避免转至急诊室的临床和成本效益:短暂性脑缺血发作急诊转诊(TIER)干预措施是通过对英国救护服务进行调查、对院前治疗 TIA 的证据进行范围审查以及召集专家临床小组商定最终形式后制定的。英国南威尔士的护理人员被随机分配到试验干预组(TIA门诊转诊)或对照组(常规护理),患者的分配由主治护理人员决定。预设的进展标准包括:TIA门诊转诊患者比例、数据检索、患者满意度和潜在的成本效益:从 2016 年 12 月到 2017 年 9 月,89 名护理人员招募了 53 名患者(36 名干预患者;17 名对照患者);48 名患者(31 名干预患者;17 名对照患者)同意通过常规数据进行随访。在7名被认为符合条件的干预患者中,有3名是由护理人员转介到TIA诊所的。其他干预组患者的禁忌症包括面部/手势/言语/时间阳性(13 人);ABCD2 评分 >3 (5 人);已抗凝(2 人);TIA 峰值(1 人);其他(8 人)。所有征得同意的患者均获得了常规收集的电子健康记录,用于报告进一步的医疗保健接触。与对照组(平均 4.2/5)相比,干预组患者报告的护理满意度更高(平均 4.8/5)。健康经济分析表明,干预组的质量调整生命年损失为 0.0094(95% CI -0.0371,0.0183),P=0.475:TIER 可行性研究未达到进展标准,主要原因是患者识别率和转诊率较低。不建议在这种情况下进行完全有效的 RCT 研究。试验注册号:ISRCTN85516498。
{"title":"Transient Ischaemic attack Emergency Referral (TIER): randomised feasibility trial results.","authors":"Alan Watkins, Jenna Katherine Jones, Khalid Ali, Richard Dewar, Adrian Edwards, Bridie Angela Evans, Lyn Evans, Gary A Ford, Chelsey Hampton, Roger John, Charlene Jones, Chris Moore, Michael Obiako, Alison Porter, Alan Pryce, Tom Quinn, Anne C Seagrove, Helen Snooks, Shirley Whitman, Nigel Rees","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2021-212230","DOIUrl":"10.1136/emermed-2021-212230","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early assessment of patients with suspected transient ischaemic attack (TIA) is crucial to provision of effective care, including initiation of preventive therapies and identification of stroke mimics. Many patients with TIA present to emergency medical services (EMS) but may not require hospitalisation. Paramedics could identify and refer patients with low-risk TIA, without conveyance to the ED. Safety and effectiveness of this model is unknown.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the feasibility of undertaking a fully powered randomised controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate clinical and cost-effectiveness of paramedic referral of patients who call EMS with low-risk TIA to TIA clinic, avoiding transfer to ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Transient Ischaemic attack Emergency Referral (TIER) intervention was developed through a survey of UK ambulance services, a scoping review of evidence of prehospital care of TIA and convening a specialist clinical panel to agree its final form. Paramedics in South Wales, UK, were randomly allocated to trial intervention (TIA clinic referral) or control (usual care) arms, with patients' allocation determined by that of attending paramedics.Predetermined progression criteria considered: proportion of patients referred to TIA clinic, data retrieval, patient satisfaction and potential cost-effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From December 2016 to September 2017, eighty-nine paramedics recruited 53 patients (36 intervention; 17 control); 48 patients (31 intervention; 17 control) consented to follow-up via routine data. Three intervention patients, of seven deemed eligible, were referred to TIA clinic by paramedics. Contraindications recorded for the other intervention arm patients were: Face/Arms/Speech/Time positive (n=13); ABCD2 score >3 (n=5); already anticoagulated (n=2); crescendo TIA (n=1); other (n=8). Routinely collected electronic health records, used to report further healthcare contacts, were obtained for all consenting patients. Patient-reported satisfaction with care was higher in the intervention arm (mean 4.8/5) than the control arm (mean 4.2/5). Health economic analysis suggests an intervention arm quality-adjusted life-year loss of 0.0094 (95% CI -0.0371, 0.0183), p=0.475.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The TIER feasibility study did not meet its progression criteria, largely due to low patient identification and referral rates. A fully powered RCT in this setting is not recommended.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>ISRCTN85516498.</p>","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"710-716"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142399761","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-20DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2024-214250
Ilya Danelich, Veruska Di Sena, James Williams, Gregory Oreste
{"title":"Correspondence on 'Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate versus andexanet alfa for the reversal of traumatic brain injuries' by Sadek <i>et al</i>.","authors":"Ilya Danelich, Veruska Di Sena, James Williams, Gregory Oreste","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2024-214250","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2024-214250","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142681173","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-20DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2024-214565
Erin Sadek, Jason Hecht
{"title":"Correspondence on 'Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate versus andexanet alfa for the reversal of traumatic brain injuries' by Sadek <i>et al</i>.","authors":"Erin Sadek, Jason Hecht","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2024-214565","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2024-214565","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142681177","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-14DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2024-214632
Ruth Brown
{"title":"How can we improve on advanced clinical practitioner training?","authors":"Ruth Brown","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2024-214632","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2024-214632","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142616984","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-14DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2023-213712
Colin J Crooks, Joe West, Jo R Morling, Mark Simmonds, Irene Juurlink, Steve Briggs, Simon Cruickshank, Susan Hammond-Pears, Dominick Shaw, Tim R Card, Andrew W Fogarty
Background: Pulse oximetry measures oxygen saturation non-invasively by using differential absorption of infrared signals which are dependent on the oxyhaemoglobin:deoxyhaemoglobin ratio. We tested the hypothesis that pulse oximetry error in measurements of blood oxygen saturations may be associated with blood haemoglobin levels.
Methods: The study design was an observational study of all adult patients admitted to a large teaching hospital with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection from February 2020 to December 2021 who had arterial blood gases (ABG) drawn. The pulse oximetry reading was compared with the arterial saturation on the ABG and the measurement error was determined according to the ABG haemoglobin. A secondary analysis was performed among a subset of patients with venous haemoglobins drawn within 24 hours, comparing measurement error between ABG arterial saturation and pulse oximetry readings between those with normal (150 g/L) and low (70 g/L) haemoglobins.
Results: The analysis used 5922 paired oxygen saturations from 3994 patients with contemporaneous haemoglobin measurements by ABG. A 1 g/L decrease in blood haemoglobin was associated with an 0.021% (95% CI: +0.008% to +0.033%) increase in the measurement error (in the direction of a falsely elevated reading.). In the 1086 patients who had had a venous haemoglobin there was a 0.055% (95% CI: +0.020% to +0.090%) increase in the measurement error of oxygen saturation per 1 g/L decrease in blood haemoglobin. The measurement error was thus greater in those with anaemia than in those with normal haemoglobin.
Conclusion: As blood haemoglobin decreases, the oxygen saturation measurement derived from a pulse oximeter reads erroneously higher than the true value measured by ABG. While this study was confined to patients with COVID-19, physicians should be aware of this potential discrepancy among all patients with haemorrhage or known anaemia.
{"title":"Inverse linear association between blood haemoglobin and oxygen saturation accuracy measured by pulse oximetry: a cross-sectional analysis in individuals with COVID-19 infection.","authors":"Colin J Crooks, Joe West, Jo R Morling, Mark Simmonds, Irene Juurlink, Steve Briggs, Simon Cruickshank, Susan Hammond-Pears, Dominick Shaw, Tim R Card, Andrew W Fogarty","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2023-213712","DOIUrl":"10.1136/emermed-2023-213712","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulse oximetry measures oxygen saturation non-invasively by using differential absorption of infrared signals which are dependent on the oxyhaemoglobin:deoxyhaemoglobin ratio. We tested the hypothesis that pulse oximetry error in measurements of blood oxygen saturations may be associated with blood haemoglobin levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study design was an observational study of all adult patients admitted to a large teaching hospital with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection from February 2020 to December 2021 who had arterial blood gases (ABG) drawn. The pulse oximetry reading was compared with the arterial saturation on the ABG and the measurement error was determined according to the ABG haemoglobin. A secondary analysis was performed among a subset of patients with venous haemoglobins drawn within 24 hours, comparing measurement error between ABG arterial saturation and pulse oximetry readings between those with normal (150 g/L) and low (70 g/L) haemoglobins.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis used 5922 paired oxygen saturations from 3994 patients with contemporaneous haemoglobin measurements by ABG. A 1 g/L decrease in blood haemoglobin was associated with an 0.021% (95% CI: +0.008% to +0.033%) increase in the measurement error (in the direction of a falsely elevated reading.). In the 1086 patients who had had a venous haemoglobin there was a 0.055% (95% CI: +0.020% to +0.090%) increase in the measurement error of oxygen saturation per 1 g/L decrease in blood haemoglobin. The measurement error was thus greater in those with anaemia than in those with normal haemoglobin.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As blood haemoglobin decreases, the oxygen saturation measurement derived from a pulse oximeter reads erroneously higher than the true value measured by ABG. While this study was confined to patients with COVID-19, physicians should be aware of this potential discrepancy among all patients with haemorrhage or known anaemia.</p>","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142616998","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-07DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2024-214125
Elizabeth Anderson, Wendy J Chaplin, Chloe Turner, Graham D Johnson, Holly Blake, Andrew Tabner
Background: The annual incidence of testicular torsion is approximately 1 in 4000 males under the age of 25. Despite the 97% testicular salvage rate when surgical intervention is within 6 hours of onset, orchidectomy is required in 40% of cases. These comparatively poor outcomes are driven by delays to intervention, the majority of which take place prior to presentation to healthcare. This study synthesises existing evidence to understand factors leading to delayed presentation to hospital in individuals with acute scrotal pain.
Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed with support from an information scientist. Two authors performed article screening, data extraction and inductive thematic synthesis independently, with disagreements resolved by discussion at each stage. An assessment of confidence in the review findings was performed using the ConQual approach.
Results: The search identified 1251 unique articles for screening, with five eligible for inclusion; all included publications were drawn from two PhD projects. Synthesis of these articles revealed five descriptive themes with five subthemes. A lack of knowledge and education about testicular health, embarrassment and reliance on others for access to healthcare are major factors leading to delays in presentation. Societal and cultural impacts on health-seeking behaviour and denial were also causes of delayed presentation to healthcare.
Discussion: A lack of knowledge about testicular anatomy and health among both adults and children is amenable to improvement through education, and would likely impact many of the factors identified as contributory to delays. Communication was an overarching factor connecting the descriptive themes.
{"title":"Experiences and perceptions of acute testicular pain, with a focus on reasons for delayed presentation to hospital: a qualitative evidence synthesis.","authors":"Elizabeth Anderson, Wendy J Chaplin, Chloe Turner, Graham D Johnson, Holly Blake, Andrew Tabner","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2024-214125","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2024-214125","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The annual incidence of testicular torsion is approximately 1 in 4000 males under the age of 25. Despite the 97% testicular salvage rate when surgical intervention is within 6 hours of onset, orchidectomy is required in 40% of cases. These comparatively poor outcomes are driven by delays to intervention, the majority of which take place prior to presentation to healthcare. This study synthesises existing evidence to understand factors leading to delayed presentation to hospital in individuals with acute scrotal pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was performed with support from an information scientist. Two authors performed article screening, data extraction and inductive thematic synthesis independently, with disagreements resolved by discussion at each stage. An assessment of confidence in the review findings was performed using the ConQual approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified 1251 unique articles for screening, with five eligible for inclusion; all included publications were drawn from two PhD projects. Synthesis of these articles revealed five descriptive themes with five subthemes. A lack of knowledge and education about testicular health, embarrassment and reliance on others for access to healthcare are major factors leading to delays in presentation. Societal and cultural impacts on health-seeking behaviour and denial were also causes of delayed presentation to healthcare.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>A lack of knowledge about testicular anatomy and health among both adults and children is amenable to improvement through education, and would likely impact many of the factors identified as contributory to delays. Communication was an overarching factor connecting the descriptive themes.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42023469435.</p>","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142616980","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-04DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2023-213852
Andrew Beckham, Nicola Cooper
Introduction: Stress and burnout are prevalent among emergency department (ED) staff in the UK. The concept of well-being interventions for ED staff is a growing area of interest and research worldwide. Various interventions are described in the literature, yet little is known about the experience of ED staff in the UK of interventions designed to support their well-being. This study therefore aimed to understand their experiences of these interventions.
Methods: Semi-structured interviews were carried out with nine members of staff from different professional backgrounds at a tertiary trauma centre in the UK between June and July 2023. The inclusion criteria were staff who had worked in a National Health Service ED setting in the UK for more than 12 months. Participants were asked about their experience and perceptions of well-being interventions delivered in the workplace. A phenomenographical approach was applied to analyse the narrative data.
Results: The findings resulted in seven qualitatively different but related categories. Participants experienced interventions to be: (1) necessary due to their stressful working environment; (2) beneficial in supporting their well-being; (3) feasible in an ED setting; (4) inadequate due to lack of quality and accessibility; (5) improving with increased acceptability and support; (6) restricted by clinical and organisational factors; and (7) ambiguous in definition, measurement and individual interpretation. Space for facilitated reflection and role modelling by leaders were felt to be important.
Conclusions: Job demands simultaneously necessitate and restrict the provision of adequate interventions to support well-being in the ED. These demands need to be addressed as part of wider organisational change including the provision of self-care facilities and opportunities, protected time for facilitated reflection, high-quality and accessible learning opportunities for personal and professional development, training for staff delivering well-being interventions and positive role modelling by leaders.
{"title":"Well-being interventions for emergency department staff: 'necessary' but 'inadequate' - a phenomenographic study.","authors":"Andrew Beckham, Nicola Cooper","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2023-213852","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2023-213852","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Stress and burnout are prevalent among emergency department (ED) staff in the UK. The concept of well-being interventions for ED staff is a growing area of interest and research worldwide. Various interventions are described in the literature, yet little is known about the experience of ED staff in the UK of interventions designed to support their well-being. This study therefore aimed to understand their experiences of these interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were carried out with nine members of staff from different professional backgrounds at a tertiary trauma centre in the UK between June and July 2023. The inclusion criteria were staff who had worked in a National Health Service ED setting in the UK for more than 12 months. Participants were asked about their experience and perceptions of well-being interventions delivered in the workplace. A phenomenographical approach was applied to analyse the narrative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings resulted in seven qualitatively different but related categories. Participants experienced interventions to be: (1) necessary due to their stressful working environment; (2) beneficial in supporting their well-being; (3) feasible in an ED setting; (4) inadequate due to lack of quality and accessibility; (5) improving with increased acceptability and support; (6) restricted by clinical and organisational factors; and (7) ambiguous in definition, measurement and individual interpretation. Space for facilitated reflection and role modelling by leaders were felt to be important.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Job demands simultaneously necessitate and restrict the provision of adequate interventions to support well-being in the ED. These demands need to be addressed as part of wider organisational change including the provision of self-care facilities and opportunities, protected time for facilitated reflection, high-quality and accessible learning opportunities for personal and professional development, training for staff delivering well-being interventions and positive role modelling by leaders.</p>","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142575639","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Patients with traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (t-OHCA) require on-scene airway management to maintain tissue oxygenation. However, the benefits of prehospital endotracheal intubation remain unclear, particularly regarding neurological outcomes. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the association between prehospital intubation and favourable neurological outcomes in patients with t-OHCA.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study used a Japanese nationwide trauma registry from 2019 to 2021. It included adult patients diagnosed with traumatic cardiac arrest on emergency medical service arrival. Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) scores, survival at discharge and presence of signs of life on hospital arrival were compared between patients with prehospital intubation and those with supraglottic airway or manual airway management. Inverse probability weighting with propensity scores was used to adjust for patient, injury, treatment and institutional characteristics, and the effects of intubation on outcomes averaged over baseline covariates were shown as marginal ORs.
Results: A total of 1524 patients were included in this study, with 370 undergoing intubation before hospital arrival. Prehospital intubation was associated with favourable neurological outcomes at discharge (GOS≥4 in 5/362 (1.4%) vs 10/1129 (0.9%); marginal OR 1.99; 95% CI 1.12 to 3.53; p=0.021) and higher survival to discharge (25/370 (6.8%) vs 63/1154 (5.5%); marginal OR 1.43; 95% CI 1.08 to 1.90; p=0.012). However, no association with signs of life on hospital arrival was observed (65/341 (19.1%) vs 147/1026 (14.3%); marginal OR 1.09; 95% CI 0.89 to 1.34). Favourable outcomes were observed only in patients who underwent intubation with a severe chest injury (Abbreviated Injury Score ≥3) and with transportation time to hospital >15 min (OR 14.44 and 2.00; 95% CI 1.89 to 110.02 and 1.09 to 3.65, respectively).
Conclusions: Prehospital intubation was associated with favourable neurological outcomes among adult patients with t-OHCA who had severe chest injury or transportation time >15 min.
背景:创伤性院外心脏骤停(t-OHCA)患者需要现场气道管理以维持组织氧合。然而,院前气管插管的益处仍不明确,尤其是在神经系统预后方面。因此,本研究旨在评估院前插管与 t-OHCA 患者良好的神经功能预后之间的关系:这项回顾性队列研究使用的是 2019 年至 2021 年日本全国创伤登记处的数据。研究对象包括在急救医疗服务到达时被诊断为创伤性心脏骤停的成年患者。比较了院前插管患者与使用声门上气道或人工气道管理的患者之间的格拉斯哥结果量表(GOS)评分、出院存活率和到达医院时的生命迹象。使用倾向分数进行反概率加权,以调整患者、损伤、治疗和机构特征,插管对基线协变量结果的影响以边际ORs表示:本研究共纳入1524名患者,其中370名患者在到达医院前进行了插管。院前插管与出院时良好的神经功能结果有关(5/362 (1.4%) vs 10/1129 (0.9%)患者的GOS≥4;边际OR 1.99;95% CI 1.12 to 3.53;p=0.021),与较高的出院存活率有关(25/370 (6.8%) vs 63/1154 (5.5%);边际OR 1.43;95% CI 1.08 to 1.90;p=0.012)。然而,未观察到与到达医院时的生命迹象有关(65/341 (19.1%) vs 147/1026 (14.3%);边际 OR 1.09;95% CI 0.89 至 1.34)。只有在胸部严重受伤(简略损伤评分≥3)和送往医院时间大于 15 分钟的患者中才观察到有利的结果(OR 分别为 14.44 和 2.00;95% CI 分别为 1.89 至 110.02 和 1.09 至 3.65):院前插管与严重胸部损伤或转运时间大于 15 分钟的 t-OHCA 成年患者的良好神经功能预后有关。
{"title":"Prehospital endotracheal intubation for traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and improved neurological outcomes.","authors":"Ryo Yamamoto, Masaru Suzuki, Ryo Takemura, Junichi Sasaki","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2024-214337","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2024-214337","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (t-OHCA) require on-scene airway management to maintain tissue oxygenation. However, the benefits of prehospital endotracheal intubation remain unclear, particularly regarding neurological outcomes. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the association between prehospital intubation and favourable neurological outcomes in patients with t-OHCA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study used a Japanese nationwide trauma registry from 2019 to 2021. It included adult patients diagnosed with traumatic cardiac arrest on emergency medical service arrival. Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) scores, survival at discharge and presence of signs of life on hospital arrival were compared between patients with prehospital intubation and those with supraglottic airway or manual airway management. Inverse probability weighting with propensity scores was used to adjust for patient, injury, treatment and institutional characteristics, and the effects of intubation on outcomes averaged over baseline covariates were shown as marginal ORs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1524 patients were included in this study, with 370 undergoing intubation before hospital arrival. Prehospital intubation was associated with favourable neurological outcomes at discharge (GOS≥4 in 5/362 (1.4%) vs 10/1129 (0.9%); marginal OR 1.99; 95% CI 1.12 to 3.53; p=0.021) and higher survival to discharge (25/370 (6.8%) vs 63/1154 (5.5%); marginal OR 1.43; 95% CI 1.08 to 1.90; p=0.012). However, no association with signs of life on hospital arrival was observed (65/341 (19.1%) vs 147/1026 (14.3%); marginal OR 1.09; 95% CI 0.89 to 1.34). Favourable outcomes were observed only in patients who underwent intubation with a severe chest injury (Abbreviated Injury Score ≥3) and with transportation time to hospital >15 min (OR 14.44 and 2.00; 95% CI 1.89 to 110.02 and 1.09 to 3.65, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prehospital intubation was associated with favourable neurological outcomes among adult patients with t-OHCA who had severe chest injury or transportation time >15 min.</p>","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142563991","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}