Pub Date : 2025-12-15DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9764
EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials (FCM), Claude Lambré, Riccardo Crebelli, Maria da Silva, Koni Grob, Maria Rosaria Milana, Marja Pronk, Gilles Rivière, Mario Ščetar, Georgios Theodoridis, Els Van Hoeck, Nadia Waegeneers, Vincent Dudler, Constantine Papaspyrides, Maria de Fátima Tavares Poças, Remigio Marano, Evgenia Lampi
The EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials (FCM) assessed the safety of the recycling process EREMA Vacurema Basic (EU register number RECYC 336). The input is washed and dried poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) flakes mainly originating from collected post-consumer PET containers, with below 5% PET from non-food consumer applications. The flakes are heated in a continuous flake reactor (step 2) under vacuum before being extruded. Having examined the challenge test provided, the Panel concluded that step 2 is critical in determining the decontamination efficiency of the process. The operating parameters to control the efficiency are the temperature, the pressure (vacuum) and the residence time. It was demonstrated that this recycling process ensures that the level of migration of potential unknown contaminants into food is below the conservatively modelled migration of 0.0481 or 0.0962 μg/kg food, depending on the molar mass of the contaminant substance. Therefore, the Panel concluded that the recycled PET obtained from this process is not of safety concern, when used at up to 100% for the manufacture of materials and articles for contact with all types of foodstuffs, including drinking water, and used for long-term storage at room temperature or below, with or without hot-fill. Articles made of this recycled PET are not intended to be used in microwave and conventional ovens and such uses are not covered by this evaluation.
{"title":"Safety assessment of the process EREMA Vacurema Basic used to recycle post-consumer PET into food contact materials","authors":"EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials (FCM), Claude Lambré, Riccardo Crebelli, Maria da Silva, Koni Grob, Maria Rosaria Milana, Marja Pronk, Gilles Rivière, Mario Ščetar, Georgios Theodoridis, Els Van Hoeck, Nadia Waegeneers, Vincent Dudler, Constantine Papaspyrides, Maria de Fátima Tavares Poças, Remigio Marano, Evgenia Lampi","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9764","DOIUrl":"10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9764","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials (FCM) assessed the safety of the recycling process EREMA Vacurema Basic (EU register number RECYC 336). The input is washed and dried poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) flakes mainly originating from collected post-consumer PET containers, with below 5% PET from non-food consumer applications. The flakes are heated in a continuous flake reactor (step 2) under vacuum before being extruded. Having examined the challenge test provided, the Panel concluded that step 2 is critical in determining the decontamination efficiency of the process. The operating parameters to control the efficiency are the temperature, the pressure (vacuum) and the residence time. It was demonstrated that this recycling process ensures that the level of migration of potential unknown contaminants into food is below the conservatively modelled migration of 0.0481 or 0.0962 μg/kg food, depending on the molar mass of the contaminant substance. Therefore, the Panel concluded that the recycled PET obtained from this process is not of safety concern, when used at up to 100% for the manufacture of materials and articles for contact with all types of foodstuffs, including drinking water, and used for long-term storage at room temperature or below, with or without hot-fill. Articles made of this recycled PET are not intended to be used in microwave and conventional ovens and such uses are not covered by this evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11657,"journal":{"name":"EFSA Journal","volume":"23 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12704016/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145767574","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-15DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.e231117
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Tatiane C. G. Oliveira, F. Chamorro, Eliana Pereira, Sara Sousa, Fátima Barroso, Crtistina Delerue-Matos, Valentina F. Domingues, Lillian Barros, Miguel A. Prieto
The present work, developed within the EU-FORA fellowship programme, assessed the risk assessment of vegetable by-product extracts as natural alternatives to synthetic preservatives in food formulations. Extracts were obtained from onion peel (Allium cepa L.), zucchini (Cucurbita pepo L.) and kale (Brassica oleracea L. var. acephala), which represent abundant residues with limited commercial value but high potential for valorisation. Suitable extraction techniques were applied to each matrix, and the resulting extracts were characterised through phenolic profiling, antioxidant activity, cytocompatibility and pesticide residue analysis. Onion peel extract was rich in quercetin glycosides and showed strong antioxidant activity, while zucchini and kale extracts contained quercetin or kaempferol derivatives with moderate effects. Cytocompatibility assays demonstrated acceptable safety margins at lower concentrations, though dose-dependent toxicity appeared at higher levels, particularly in hepatic cells. Pesticide residues were mostly absent or present only at trace levels in zucchini and kale extracts. In onion peel extract, hexachlorobenzene and β-HCH were detected, but remained below EU maximum residue limits (MRLs). Overall, the findings suggest that the benefits of these extracts, including preservative potential and sustainable waste valorisation, outweigh the identified risks.
目前的工作是在欧盟-论坛研究金方案范围内开展的,评估了蔬菜副产品提取物作为食品配方中合成防腐剂的天然替代品的风险评估。从洋葱皮(Allium cepa L.)、西葫芦(Cucurbita pepo L.)和羽衣甘蓝(Brassica oleracea L. var. acephala)中获得了丰富的残留物,其商业价值有限,但具有很高的增值潜力。对每种基质采用合适的提取技术,并通过酚类分析、抗氧化活性、细胞相容性和农药残留分析对所得提取物进行表征。洋葱皮提取物含有丰富的槲皮素苷,具有较强的抗氧化活性,而西葫芦和羽衣甘蓝提取物含有槲皮素或山奈酚衍生物,抗氧化作用中等。细胞相容性试验表明,在较低浓度下,安全边际是可以接受的,但在较高浓度下,特别是在肝细胞中,出现了剂量依赖性毒性。在西葫芦和羽衣甘蓝提取物中,农药残留大多不存在或仅存在微量水平。洋葱皮提取物中检出六氯苯和β-六氯环己烷,但均低于欧盟最大残留限量(MRLs)。总的来说,研究结果表明,这些提取物的好处,包括防腐剂的潜力和可持续的废物增值,超过了确定的风险。
{"title":"Risk assessment of replacing synthetic preservatives with natural ingredients","authors":"European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Tatiane C. G. Oliveira, F. Chamorro, Eliana Pereira, Sara Sousa, Fátima Barroso, Crtistina Delerue-Matos, Valentina F. Domingues, Lillian Barros, Miguel A. Prieto","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2025.e231117","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.e231117","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The present work, developed within the EU-FORA fellowship programme, assessed the risk assessment of vegetable by-product extracts as natural alternatives to synthetic preservatives in food formulations. Extracts were obtained from onion peel (<i>Allium cepa</i> L.), zucchini (<i>Cucurbita pepo</i> L.) and kale (<i>Brassica oleracea</i> L. var. <i>acephala</i>), which represent abundant residues with limited commercial value but high potential for valorisation. Suitable extraction techniques were applied to each matrix, and the resulting extracts were characterised through phenolic profiling, antioxidant activity, cytocompatibility and pesticide residue analysis. Onion peel extract was rich in quercetin glycosides and showed strong antioxidant activity, while zucchini and kale extracts contained quercetin or kaempferol derivatives with moderate effects. Cytocompatibility assays demonstrated acceptable safety margins at lower concentrations, though dose-dependent toxicity appeared at higher levels, particularly in hepatic cells. Pesticide residues were mostly absent or present only at trace levels in zucchini and kale extracts. In onion peel extract, hexachlorobenzene and β-HCH were detected, but remained below EU maximum residue limits (MRLs). Overall, the findings suggest that the benefits of these extracts, including preservative potential and sustainable waste valorisation, outweigh the identified risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":11657,"journal":{"name":"EFSA Journal","volume":"23 S1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.e231117","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145751312","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-15DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.e231104
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Pilar Ortiz, Margarita Aguilera, Anna Kostka, Agnieszka Gruszecka-Kosowska
Anthropogenic activities, such as industrial processes, urban development, intensive agriculture and waste disposal, have significantly contributed to the continuous introduction and accumulation of a wide array of xenobiotic compounds into natural ecosystems. Among them, emerging contaminants (ECs) such as pharmaceuticals, endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are of increasing concern due to their persistence, bioactivity and limited regulation. ECs enter ecosystems through diverse pathways including wastewater discharge, agricultural runoff and atmospheric deposition. Once released, many of these xenobiotics can bioaccumulate in organisms and enter the food chain, posing serious risks to food safety and public health. Traditional physico-chemical remediation methods are often insufficient or environmentally taxing, prompting a shift toward bio-based alternatives like bioremediation. These approaches, which rely on the activity of microbial communities to degrade pollutants, offer more sustainable solutions but require further interdisciplinary research to optimise their use. The One Health framework provides an effective model for addressing the complex risks posed by xenobiotics. This research programme aims to harmonise methodologies for cumulative dietary risk assessment across Europe and explore microbial strategies for xenobiotic degradation. By integrating microbiomics, toxicology, environmental science and food safety, this approach supports the development of safer food systems and more effective pollution management in line with the ‘farm to fork’ and One Health principles.
{"title":"Cumulative exposure of xenobiotics of emerging concern from agrifood under the One Health approach (XENOBAC4OH)","authors":"European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Pilar Ortiz, Margarita Aguilera, Anna Kostka, Agnieszka Gruszecka-Kosowska","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2025.e231104","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.e231104","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Anthropogenic activities, such as industrial processes, urban development, intensive agriculture and waste disposal, have significantly contributed to the continuous introduction and accumulation of a wide array of xenobiotic compounds into natural ecosystems. Among them, emerging contaminants (ECs) such as pharmaceuticals, endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are of increasing concern due to their persistence, bioactivity and limited regulation. ECs enter ecosystems through diverse pathways including wastewater discharge, agricultural runoff and atmospheric deposition. Once released, many of these xenobiotics can bioaccumulate in organisms and enter the food chain, posing serious risks to food safety and public health. Traditional physico-chemical remediation methods are often insufficient or environmentally taxing, prompting a shift toward bio-based alternatives like bioremediation. These approaches, which rely on the activity of microbial communities to degrade pollutants, offer more sustainable solutions but require further interdisciplinary research to optimise their use. The One Health framework provides an effective model for addressing the complex risks posed by xenobiotics. This research programme aims to harmonise methodologies for cumulative dietary risk assessment across Europe and explore microbial strategies for xenobiotic degradation. By integrating microbiomics, toxicology, environmental science and food safety, this approach supports the development of safer food systems and more effective pollution management in line with the ‘farm to fork’ and One Health principles.</p>","PeriodicalId":11657,"journal":{"name":"EFSA Journal","volume":"23 S1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.e231104","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145751332","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-15DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.e231113
Joanna Bucka-Kolendo, Pablo S. Fernández, Enriqueta Garcia-Gutierrez
Food safety is a key concern in the European Union, with the harmonisation of risk assessment methodologies being a strategic priority. The EU-FORA programme, coordinated by EFSA, promotes standardised approaches to microbial risk assessment across Europe. Metagenomic sequencing has advanced the understanding of microbial ecosystems in food production, with Illumina (short-reads) and Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) (long-reads) playing significant roles in detecting pathogens and characterising microbial communities. These technologies differ in accuracy, read length and resolution, potentially influencing risk profiles when used in quantitative microbiological risk assessment (QMRA). This fellowship, conducted at UPCT in Spain and IBPRS-PIB in Poland, compares the two platforms in assessing microbial populations in Polish and Spanish dairy chains. It explores how sequencing strategy affects hazard identification and QMRA outcomes, while also demonstrating how metagenomic data can enhance predictive modelling and support practical improvements in food safety management.
{"title":"Training in metataxonomics-integrated risk assessment for foodborne pathogens in the Polish and Spanish dairy chain (DAIRYPOL)","authors":"Joanna Bucka-Kolendo, Pablo S. Fernández, Enriqueta Garcia-Gutierrez","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2025.e231113","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.e231113","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Food safety is a key concern in the European Union, with the harmonisation of risk assessment methodologies being a strategic priority. The EU-FORA programme, coordinated by EFSA, promotes standardised approaches to microbial risk assessment across Europe. Metagenomic sequencing has advanced the understanding of microbial ecosystems in food production, with Illumina (short-reads) and Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) (long-reads) playing significant roles in detecting pathogens and characterising microbial communities. These technologies differ in accuracy, read length and resolution, potentially influencing risk profiles when used in quantitative microbiological risk assessment (QMRA). This fellowship, conducted at UPCT in Spain and IBPRS-PIB in Poland, compares the two platforms in assessing microbial populations in Polish and Spanish dairy chains. It explores how sequencing strategy affects hazard identification and QMRA outcomes, while also demonstrating how metagenomic data can enhance predictive modelling and support practical improvements in food safety management.</p>","PeriodicalId":11657,"journal":{"name":"EFSA Journal","volume":"23 S1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.e231113","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145751359","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-15DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9809
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Karine Angeli, Adeline Cavelier, Tamara Coja, Federica Crivellente, Anna Lanzoni, Luc Mohimont, Monica Nepal, Dimitra Nikolopoulou, Andrea Terron, Anna F. Castoldi
According to the ‘EFSA-SANTE Action Plan on Cumulative Risk Assessment for pesticides residues’, EFSA, with the support of a working group, undertook the identification of specific effects on male and female reproductive function, including fertility, that are considered relevant for grouping pesticide residues and for assessing retrospectively the cumulative risk (CRA) deriving from consumers' dietary exposure. In this first report, two specific effects leading to two correspondent cumulative assessment groups (CAGs) were identified for male reproduction, namely, (1) altered mating performance and (2) decreased fertility. Four distinct CAGs were proposed for grouping chemicals affecting female reproduction: (1) altered mating performance, (2) decreased fertility, (3) altered gestation and (4) altered parturition. EFSA also defined the list of indicators (i.e. toxicological endpoints measurable in regulatory studies) describing each specific effect. Qualitative and quantitative information on these indicators will be collected from the toxicological assessment reports on individual pesticide active substances: indicators will be used to determine the inclusion of prioritised active substances and their metabolites into the respective CAG and to estimate the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) and lowest observed adverse effect level (LOAEL) of each chemical in relation to the given specific effect. Additional endpoints (named ancillary findings), not sufficiently informative to define a specific effect but contributing to the overall evidence, will be collected for a limited number of substances identified as risk drivers, based on hazard and exposure considerations, to support the estimation of CAG-membership probabilities. Additional criteria for including active substances into CAGs, the hazard characterisation methodology and the lines of evidence for assessing CAG-membership probabilities are detailed in this report, which was sent for public consultation. The process of data extraction and actual establishment of the CAGs are instead beyond the scope of this report. This part of the CRA process was outsourced and will be dealt with in a separate report.
{"title":"Specific effects on the reproductive function including fertility relevant for cumulative risk assessment of pesticide residues","authors":"European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Karine Angeli, Adeline Cavelier, Tamara Coja, Federica Crivellente, Anna Lanzoni, Luc Mohimont, Monica Nepal, Dimitra Nikolopoulou, Andrea Terron, Anna F. Castoldi","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9809","DOIUrl":"10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9809","url":null,"abstract":"<p>According to the ‘EFSA-SANTE Action Plan on Cumulative Risk Assessment for pesticides residues’, EFSA, with the support of a working group, undertook the identification of specific effects on male and female reproductive function, including fertility, that are considered relevant for grouping pesticide residues and for assessing retrospectively the cumulative risk (CRA) deriving from consumers' dietary exposure. In this first report, two specific effects leading to two correspondent cumulative assessment groups (CAGs) were identified for male reproduction, namely, (1) altered mating performance and (2) decreased fertility. Four distinct CAGs were proposed for grouping chemicals affecting female reproduction: (1) altered mating performance, (2) decreased fertility, (3) altered gestation and (4) altered parturition. EFSA also defined the list of indicators (i.e. toxicological endpoints measurable in regulatory studies) describing each specific effect. Qualitative and quantitative information on these indicators will be collected from the toxicological assessment reports on individual pesticide active substances: indicators will be used to determine the inclusion of prioritised active substances and their metabolites into the respective CAG and to estimate the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) and lowest observed adverse effect level (LOAEL) of each chemical in relation to the given specific effect. Additional endpoints (named ancillary findings), not sufficiently informative to define a specific effect but contributing to the overall evidence, will be collected for a limited number of substances identified as risk drivers, based on hazard and exposure considerations, to support the estimation of CAG-membership probabilities. Additional criteria for including active substances into CAGs, the hazard characterisation methodology and the lines of evidence for assessing CAG-membership probabilities are detailed in this report, which was sent for public consultation. The process of data extraction and actual establishment of the CAGs are instead beyond the scope of this report. This part of the CRA process was outsourced and will be dealt with in a separate report.</p>","PeriodicalId":11657,"journal":{"name":"EFSA Journal","volume":"23 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12703411/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145767604","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-15DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.e231111
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Seta Noventa, S. Jannicke Moe, Knut Erik Tollefsen, Walter Zobl, You Song, Loredana Manfra, Adam Lillicrap
The project Computational characterisation of ecological hazard and risk of environmental mixtures focused on two key priorities in advancing a next-generation risk assessment (NGRA) workflow: (i) transitioning to assessing mixtures and (ii) utilising mechanism-based hazard assessment based on new approach methodology (NAM) data. Through a case study, an enhanced component-based mixture risk assessment (CBMRA) framework, integrating high-throughput-screening (HTS) bioactivity data combined with a quantitative adverse outcome pathway (qAOP) approach for hazard and risk assessment was demonstrated. The case study utilised a previously published qAOP based on the proposed AOP-Wiki AOP#245 ‘Uncoupling of photophosphorylation leading to reduced ATP production associated growth inhibition’ (Xie et al., 2018), which models growth inhibition via uncoupling of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation from a reference chemical on a model aquatic plant (Moe et al., 2021). It used pesticide monitoring data from the European Environmental Agency's Pesticide Indicator dataset (WISE statistics – Pesticides) in freshwater environments (European Environment Agency, 2023). Relevant bioactivity data from ToxCast and Tox21 were mapped to the target pesticides to derive equipotent mixture compared to the reference chemical used to parametrised the qAOP (i.e. 3,5-dichlorophenol), enabling assessment of the potential initiation of the AOP cascade. In silico methods were used to fill bioactivity data gaps and probabilistic modelling using a Bayesian network (BN) was designed to incorporate various uncertainties into the current NGRA workflow. The study assessed the strengths and limitations of a NAM-based CBMRA, with a particular attention on equipotency assessment as a means to extend the chemical domain of qAOPs for mechanistic ecological risk assessment. It highlighted both conceptual and technical innovations and identified research needs to improve the approach towards future regulatory adoption.
生态危害和环境混合物风险的计算特征项目侧重于推进下一代风险评估(NGRA)工作流程的两个关键优先事项:(i)过渡到评估混合物和(ii)利用基于新方法方法论(NAM)数据的基于机制的危害评估。通过案例研究,展示了一种增强的基于成分的混合风险评估(CBMRA)框架,该框架将高通量筛选(HTS)生物活性数据与定量不良结果途径(qAOP)方法相结合,用于危害和风险评估。该案例研究利用了先前发表的qAOP,该qAOP基于AOP- wiki AOP#245“光磷酸化解偶联导致ATP产生相关的生长抑制减少”(Xie等人,2018),该qAOP通过模型水生植物上参考化学物质的线粒体氧化磷酸化解偶联来模拟生长抑制(Moe等人,2021)。它使用了淡水环境中欧洲环境署农药指标数据集(WISE统计-农药)的农药监测数据(欧洲环境署,2023年)。将来自ToxCast和Tox21的相关生物活性数据映射到目标农药上,与用于参数化qAOP的参比化学物质(即3,5-二氯酚)相比,得出等效混合物,从而能够评估AOP级联的潜在启动。使用计算机方法填补生物活性数据空白,并设计了使用贝叶斯网络(BN)的概率建模,以将各种不确定性纳入当前的NGRA工作流程。该研究评估了基于nama的CBMRA的优势和局限性,特别关注等效性评估作为一种手段,将qAOPs的化学领域扩展到机械生态风险评估。它强调了概念和技术创新,并确定了改进未来监管采用方法的研究需要。
{"title":"Computational characterisation of ecological hazard and risk of environmental mixtures","authors":"European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Seta Noventa, S. Jannicke Moe, Knut Erik Tollefsen, Walter Zobl, You Song, Loredana Manfra, Adam Lillicrap","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2025.e231111","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.e231111","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The project <i>Computational characterisation of ecological hazard and risk of environmental mixtures</i> focused on two key priorities in advancing a next-generation risk assessment (NGRA) workflow: (i) transitioning to assessing mixtures and (ii) utilising mechanism-based hazard assessment based on new approach methodology (NAM) data. Through a case study, an enhanced component-based mixture risk assessment (CBMRA) framework, integrating high-throughput-screening (HTS) bioactivity data combined with a quantitative adverse outcome pathway (qAOP) approach for hazard and risk assessment was demonstrated. The case study utilised a previously published qAOP based on the proposed AOP-Wiki AOP#245 ‘Uncoupling of photophosphorylation leading to reduced ATP production associated growth inhibition’ (Xie et al., 2018), which models growth inhibition via uncoupling of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation from a reference chemical on a model aquatic plant (Moe et al., 2021). It used pesticide monitoring data from the European Environmental Agency's Pesticide Indicator dataset (WISE statistics – Pesticides) in freshwater environments (European Environment Agency, 2023). Relevant bioactivity data from ToxCast and Tox21 were mapped to the target pesticides to derive equipotent mixture compared to the reference chemical used to parametrised the qAOP (i.e. 3,5-dichlorophenol), enabling assessment of the potential initiation of the AOP cascade. In silico methods were used to fill bioactivity data gaps and probabilistic modelling using a Bayesian network (BN) was designed to incorporate various uncertainties into the current NGRA workflow. The study assessed the strengths and limitations of a NAM-based CBMRA, with a particular attention on equipotency assessment as a means to extend the chemical domain of qAOPs for mechanistic ecological risk assessment. It highlighted both conceptual and technical innovations and identified research needs to improve the approach towards future regulatory adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":11657,"journal":{"name":"EFSA Journal","volume":"23 S1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.e231111","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145751301","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-15DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.e231108
Elena Butovskaya, Veronika Sele, Anne-Katrine Lundebye, Rita Hannisdal, Aasim Ali, Simonetta Menotta, Annette Bernhard
The European Union (EU) food safety legislative framework is designed to guarantee the safety of the entire food production chain through a comprehensive ‘from farm to fork’ approach. Chemical safety of the food production chain, encompassing contaminants, veterinary drugs and pesticide residues, food/feed additives, is further regulated by a specific legislative framework. Regulation (EU) 2017/625 requires each Member State to ensure that official controls are carried out to verify compliance with food, feed and animal health laws. These controls are to be performed in a risk-based manner through specifically designed multi-annual national control plans. In Norway, where aquaculture represents a highly developed sector, systematic monitoring of chemical contaminants throughout the aquaculture production chain is essential to safeguard food safety and identify potential risks to both public and animal health. Therefore, the present work programme was focused on the development and subsequent application of a ranking methodology for the prioritisation of chemical contaminants to be included in the Norwegian national monitoring programmes for the aquaculture production chain of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) fillet and complete feed for salmonids. The fellow was involved in the identification of the assessment criteria to be included in the semi-quantitative methodology, the selection of appropriate metrics for each criterion and testing the methodology on the selected contaminants relevant for Norwegian farmed fish production chain. The developed methodology systematically incorporates the assessment of contaminants present in feed materials, fish feed and fish fillet and is intended to provide documented basis for risk-based prioritisation of contaminants for monitoring plans.
{"title":"Risk prioritisation of (emerging) contaminants in aquaculture production","authors":"Elena Butovskaya, Veronika Sele, Anne-Katrine Lundebye, Rita Hannisdal, Aasim Ali, Simonetta Menotta, Annette Bernhard","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2025.e231108","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.e231108","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The European Union (EU) food safety legislative framework is designed to guarantee the safety of the entire food production chain through a comprehensive ‘from farm to fork’ approach. Chemical safety of the food production chain, encompassing contaminants, veterinary drugs and pesticide residues, food/feed additives, is further regulated by a specific legislative framework. Regulation (EU) 2017/625 requires each Member State to ensure that official controls are carried out to verify compliance with food, feed and animal health laws. These controls are to be performed in a risk-based manner through specifically designed multi-annual national control plans. In Norway, where aquaculture represents a highly developed sector, systematic monitoring of chemical contaminants throughout the aquaculture production chain is essential to safeguard food safety and identify potential risks to both public and animal health. Therefore, the present work programme was focused on the development and subsequent application of a ranking methodology for the prioritisation of chemical contaminants to be included in the Norwegian national monitoring programmes for the aquaculture production chain of Atlantic salmon (<i>Salmo salar</i>) fillet and complete feed for salmonids. The fellow was involved in the identification of the assessment criteria to be included in the semi-quantitative methodology, the selection of appropriate metrics for each criterion and testing the methodology on the selected contaminants relevant for Norwegian farmed fish production chain. The developed methodology systematically incorporates the assessment of contaminants present in feed materials, fish feed and fish fillet and is intended to provide documented basis for risk-based prioritisation of contaminants for monitoring plans.</p>","PeriodicalId":11657,"journal":{"name":"EFSA Journal","volume":"23 S1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.e231108","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145751239","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-15DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.e231112
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Antonio Luciano, Alberto Garre Pérez, Pablo Fernández Escámez, Marios G. Kostakis, Nikos Thomaidis, Vasilis Valdramidis
The fellowship, titled ‘Integrating quantitative chemical and microbial risk assessments to optimize the disinfection of fresh products’ was implemented at the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (Greece). The fellowship aimed to provide practical training on the quantitative chemical risk assessment of emulsified nano-components used for washing fresh vegetables. This is motivated by the fact that, although a washing step is essential for the safety of fresh vegetables, chlorine-based solutions may have negative effects on the health of workers and consumers. Nanoemulsified d-limonene can thus present an alternative solution with fewer side effects. The fellowship focused in the chemical risk assessment of d-limonene residues after washing. This fellowship provided the fellow with the necessary skills in risk assessment and taught him mass spectrometry techniques for sample analysis.
{"title":"Integrating quantitative chemical and microbial risk assessments to optimise the disinfection of fresh products","authors":"European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Antonio Luciano, Alberto Garre Pérez, Pablo Fernández Escámez, Marios G. Kostakis, Nikos Thomaidis, Vasilis Valdramidis","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2025.e231112","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.e231112","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The fellowship, titled ‘Integrating quantitative chemical and microbial risk assessments to optimize the disinfection of fresh products’ was implemented at the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (Greece). The fellowship aimed to provide practical training on the quantitative chemical risk assessment of emulsified nano-components used for washing fresh vegetables. This is motivated by the fact that, although a washing step is essential for the safety of fresh vegetables, chlorine-based solutions may have negative effects on the health of workers and consumers. Nanoemulsified <span>d</span>-limonene can thus present an alternative solution with fewer side effects. The fellowship focused in the chemical risk assessment of <span>d</span>-limonene residues after washing. This fellowship provided the fellow with the necessary skills in risk assessment and taught him mass spectrometry techniques for sample analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":11657,"journal":{"name":"EFSA Journal","volume":"23 S1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.e231112","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145751330","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-15DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.e231115
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Bojan Papić, Pablo S. Fernández, Enriqueta Garcia-Gutierrez
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has become an essential tool for antimicrobial resistance (AMR) surveillance, enabling comprehensive detection of AMR determinants in both bacterial isolates and complex microbial communities. Metagenomic sequencing enables culture-independent profiling of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) in different environments, while whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is widely used in AMR surveillance laboratories to predict phenotypic resistance in major food-borne pathogens. AMR risk assessment usually considers factors such as the pathogenicity of the ARG-carrying bacterial host, the abundance of ARGs and their mobility potential inferred from association with plasmids or other mobile genetic elements that facilitate horizontal gene transfer. Clinical relevance of antimicrobials and the severity of clinical outcomes can further be implemented in AMR risk assessment. Exposure assessment contextualises hazards within real-world scenarios by estimating consumer exposure to AMR bacteria or their ARGs through food or other routes. Despite challenges in fully quantitative assessments, the integration of NGS-based surveillance with risk modelling represents a critical step towards proactive AMR risk management. In this study, broiler samples from different stages of a Slovenian and a Spanish slaughterhouse were analysed using conventional microbiology, shotgun metagenomic sequencing and WGS of isolates of selected pathogenic species. A modular, semi-quantitative risk assessment model was developed that combines (meta)genomic data with key risk factors and, where available, exposure assessment. This approach prioritises AMR risks in broiler meat processing and supports evidence-based decision-making in the areas of food safety and public health.
{"title":"Training in metagenomics-integrated risk assessment for food-borne pathogens in the Slovenian and Spanish meat chain (METAMEAT)","authors":"European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Bojan Papić, Pablo S. Fernández, Enriqueta Garcia-Gutierrez","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2025.e231115","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.e231115","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has become an essential tool for antimicrobial resistance (AMR) surveillance, enabling comprehensive detection of AMR determinants in both bacterial isolates and complex microbial communities. Metagenomic sequencing enables culture-independent profiling of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) in different environments, while whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is widely used in AMR surveillance laboratories to predict phenotypic resistance in major food-borne pathogens. AMR risk assessment usually considers factors such as the pathogenicity of the ARG-carrying bacterial host, the abundance of ARGs and their mobility potential inferred from association with plasmids or other mobile genetic elements that facilitate horizontal gene transfer. Clinical relevance of antimicrobials and the severity of clinical outcomes can further be implemented in AMR risk assessment. Exposure assessment contextualises hazards within real-world scenarios by estimating consumer exposure to AMR bacteria or their ARGs through food or other routes. Despite challenges in fully quantitative assessments, the integration of NGS-based surveillance with risk modelling represents a critical step towards proactive AMR risk management. In this study, broiler samples from different stages of a Slovenian and a Spanish slaughterhouse were analysed using conventional microbiology, shotgun metagenomic sequencing and WGS of isolates of selected pathogenic species. A modular, semi-quantitative risk assessment model was developed that combines (meta)genomic data with key risk factors and, where available, exposure assessment. This approach prioritises AMR risks in broiler meat processing and supports evidence-based decision-making in the areas of food safety and public health.</p>","PeriodicalId":11657,"journal":{"name":"EFSA Journal","volume":"23 S1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.e231115","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145751308","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-15DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9800
EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW), Søren Saxmose Nielsen, Julio Alvarez, Anette Boklund, Sabine Dippel, Jordi Figuerola, Mette S. Herskin, Virginie Michel, Miguel Angel Miranda Chueca, Eleonora Nannoni, Romolo Nonno, Anja B. Riber, Karl Ståhl, Jan Arend Stegeman, Hans-Hermann Thulke, Frank Tuyttens, Christoph Winckler, Debes Hammershaimb Christiansen, Niels Jørgen Olesen, Espen Rimstad, Anna Toffan, Niccolò Vendramin, Stella Papaleo, Ludovica Preite, Francesca Baldinelli, Fernanda Dórea
EFSA assessed the risk of introducing viral haemorrhagic septicaemia virus (VHSV), infectious haematopoietic necrosis virus (IHNV) and highly polymorphic region-deleted infectious salmon anaemia virus (HPR-deleted ISAV) into free areas through movement of fertilised eggs and gametes. No evidence of true vertical transmission of these viruses was found. However, viral contamination of the surface of fertilised eggs and gametes cannot be ruled out. Assuming full compliance with the recommendations in the new draft 4.Z chapter of the Aquatic Animal Health Code of the World Organisation for Animal Health, including individual testing of broodfish at stripping, the median probability of introduction following importation of fertilised eggs was 0.36% for VHSV and IHNV, and 0.4% for HPR-deleted ISAV. The median probabilities were reduced to 0.02% and 0.01%, respectively, if fertilised eggs were disinfected twice (as green and as eyed eggs) at origin. Additional disinfection upon arrival in the importing establishment reduced the median probability to 0.02% for all viruses with one disinfection at the origin, and to virtually zero when two disinfections were applied at the origin. The assessment also evaluated probability of introduction when only population testing before stripping is applied. Two disinfections at the origin plus one at destination also resulted in virtually zero probability of introduction. For gametes, individual testing of broodfish at stripping, along with the other risk mitigation measures recommended in the new chapter resulted in a probability of introduction ranging from 0% to 0.3%. Implementation of the measures included in the new draft 4.Z chapter is recommended to prevent the introduction of VHSV, IHNV and HPR-deleted ISAV when moving gametes and fertilised eggs from non-free to free areas. In addition, it is recommended that fertilised eggs are disinfected twice before being traded and, to further reduce the risk, also disinfected at the establishment receiving the imported materials.
{"title":"Viral haemorrhagic septicaemia virus, infectious haematopoietic necrosis virus and HPR-deleted infectious salmon anaemia virus – Risk of introduction in free areas through fertilised eggs and gametes","authors":"EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW), Søren Saxmose Nielsen, Julio Alvarez, Anette Boklund, Sabine Dippel, Jordi Figuerola, Mette S. Herskin, Virginie Michel, Miguel Angel Miranda Chueca, Eleonora Nannoni, Romolo Nonno, Anja B. Riber, Karl Ståhl, Jan Arend Stegeman, Hans-Hermann Thulke, Frank Tuyttens, Christoph Winckler, Debes Hammershaimb Christiansen, Niels Jørgen Olesen, Espen Rimstad, Anna Toffan, Niccolò Vendramin, Stella Papaleo, Ludovica Preite, Francesca Baldinelli, Fernanda Dórea","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9800","DOIUrl":"10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9800","url":null,"abstract":"<p>EFSA assessed the risk of introducing viral haemorrhagic septicaemia virus (VHSV), infectious haematopoietic necrosis virus (IHNV) and highly polymorphic region-deleted infectious salmon anaemia virus (HPR-deleted ISAV) into free areas through movement of fertilised eggs and gametes. No evidence of true vertical transmission of these viruses was found. However, viral contamination of the surface of fertilised eggs and gametes cannot be ruled out. Assuming full compliance with the recommendations in the new draft 4.Z chapter of the Aquatic Animal Health Code of the World Organisation for Animal Health, including individual testing of broodfish at stripping, the median probability of introduction following importation of fertilised eggs was 0.36% for VHSV and IHNV, and 0.4% for HPR-deleted ISAV. The median probabilities were reduced to 0.02% and 0.01%, respectively, if fertilised eggs were disinfected twice (as green and as eyed eggs) at origin. Additional disinfection upon arrival in the importing establishment reduced the median probability to 0.02% for all viruses with one disinfection at the origin, and to virtually zero when two disinfections were applied at the origin. The assessment also evaluated probability of introduction when only population testing before stripping is applied. Two disinfections at the origin plus one at destination also resulted in virtually zero probability of introduction. For gametes, individual testing of broodfish at stripping, along with the other risk mitigation measures recommended in the new chapter resulted in a probability of introduction ranging from 0% to 0.3%. Implementation of the measures included in the new draft 4.Z chapter is recommended to prevent the introduction of VHSV, IHNV and HPR-deleted ISAV when moving gametes and fertilised eggs from non-free to free areas. In addition, it is recommended that fertilised eggs are disinfected twice before being traded and, to further reduce the risk, also disinfected at the establishment receiving the imported materials.</p>","PeriodicalId":11657,"journal":{"name":"EFSA Journal","volume":"23 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12703413/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145767528","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}