Background/objective: The goal of this review is to compare the 2024 and 2011 Endocrine Society's Clinical Practice Guidelines on vitamin D2 or vitamin D3 (vitamin D). The 2024 Guideline made recommendations for the general healthy population for skeletal and extra skeletal health benefits of vitamin D. This contrasts with the 2011 Guidelines which provided clinicians with guidance on how to evaluate and treat patients with vitamin D deficiency and prevent recurrence.
Discussion: The 2024 Guideline focused on randomized controlled trials and ignored association studies and other studies that have supported the skeletal and extra skeletal health benefits of vitamin D. The 2024 Guideline recommended empiric vitamin D in children and adolescents aged 1 to 18 years to reduce risk of upper respiratory tract infections, pregnant women to improve pregnancy-related outcomes, prediabetic patients to reduce risk of diabetes, and to improve mortality in those over 75 years.
Conclusion: These guidelines do not apply to individuals with abnormalities in calcium, phosphate, vitamin D, and bone metabolism which were provided in the 2011 Guidelines. For nonpregnant adults up to the age of 75, they recommend the Dietary Reference Intakes of 600 IUs (international units; 1 IU = 25 ng of vitamin D), and 800 IUs as recommended by The Institute of Medicine. Association studies have suggested that to obtain maximum extraskeletal benefits from vitamin D including reducing risk of upper respiratory tract infection for children and adults, autoimmune disorders, pre-eclampsia, low birth weight, neonatal dental caries, and deadly cancers circulating concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D should be at least 30 ng/mL with a preferred range of 40-60 ng/mL as recommended by the 2011 Guidelines.
Objective: Thyroid disorders are common. Serum TSH is frequently measured and is the single best initial biomarker to diagnose thyroid disease. Automated immunoassays used to evaluate thyroid function are susceptible to interferences that can affect test results and therefore clinical decisions. In this comprehensive review, our aim is to discuss common assay and drug interferences leading to abnormal thyroid function tests.
Methods: Authors conducted a literature review of PubMed to include studies on drug related and laboratory assay interferences leading to primary and secondary thyroid dysfunction in addition to interferences with thyroid hormone replacement and thyroid function tests.
Results: Overall, there are several assay interferences as well as drug interferences leading to primary thyroid dysfunction including iodine-containing drugs such as amiodarone, lithium, immune checkpoint inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors, drug interferences leading to secondary thyroid dysfunction such as glucocorticoids, and drug interferences affecting thyroid hormone absorption, metabolism, and thyroid binding globulin levels. In addition, assay interferences from biotin, heterophile antibodies, Macro-TSH or anti-streptavidin antibodies may occur without underlying thyroid dysfunction, leading to abnormal thyroid function tests.
Conclusion: For appropriate patient management, it is imperative to identify assay interferences when discrepancies between clinical presentation and thyroid function test results are noted.
Objective: Hypoglycemia can be life-threatening for patients with diabetes (DM). We aimed to 1) evaluate percentage of glucagon prescription in patients with hypoglycemia on CGM reports, and 2) determine incident glucagon prescription after an educational letter delivered to the providers.
Research design and methods: The study had two components - retrospective chart review and a quality improvement (QI) component. Chart review was conducted from March-October 2023 on adult patients in a tertiary care health system with type 1 DM, or type 2 DM on insulin, sulfonylurea, or meglitinide. Percentages of pre-existing and incident glucagon prescription were evaluated. For the QI, we contacted providers whose patients had hypoglycemia defined as time below range (TBR) ≥4% on CGM reports without a glucagon prescription and shared the ADA Standards of Care on hypoglycemia along with information about various forms of glucagon. Data on glucagon prescription was collected 4 weeks later.
Results: Of the 1,543 patients included 170 had TBR ≥4%. Among them, 37% had pre-existing prescription and 14% incident glucagon prescription, compared with patients without hypoglycemia (p<0.001). Pre-existing or incident glucagon prescription was seen in 28% without hypoglycemia, 38% with mild , 49% with moderate, and 63% with severe hypoglycemia (p<0.001 mild vs severe; moderate vs no hypoglycemia; severe vs no hypoglycemia). Among 70 patients whose providers received education, 27 (39%) prescribed glucagon. Glucagon emergency kit, glucagon autoinjector, and inhaled glucagon were top choices.
Conclusion: Glucagon prescription remains suboptimal among patients with hypoglycemia on CGM reports. Provider engagement via QI can increase glucagon prescription.
Objective: To evaluate the association between nocturnal hypoglycemia (NH) and latent adrenal insufficiency (LAI) among elderly aged >65 years.
Methods: This propensity-matched, retrospective observational study was conducted in an outpatient setting, assessing 1238 elderly aged >65 years between November 2017 and February 2020. Of them, 430 patients with unassessed LAI were monitored for NH using continuous glucose monitoring with Freestyle Libre Pro. The primary outcome was the combined prevalence of newly diagnosed and suspected LAI in patients with NH.
Results: After propensity score matching, 192 patients were included (96 each in the NH and non-NH group). The overall incidence rate of NH was 28.8% (124/430). The association of NH with newly diagnosed and suspected LAI was significantly higher in the NH group (26.04%, 50/192) than in the non-NH (12.5%, 24/192) (odds ratio: 3.26; 95% confidence interval: 2.59-9.06; P < .001). In the NH, compared with patients without LAI, those with new-diagnosed LAI had a higher incidence of hypoglycemia.
Conclusions: Diagnosing and treating LAI in the elderly with NH may prevent complications, including fatal diseases, and extend their life expectancy.
Objective: The challenge of selecting thyroid nodules for fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology has led to the development of the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System, primarily in 2 formats: European Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (EU-TIRADS) and American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR-TIRADS). Clinical observations suggest imperfect risk assessment for TIRADS 3 nodules ≥20 mm. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of TIRADS systems in distinguishing benign from malignant nodules in this subgroup.
Methods: From May 2023 to March 2024, 1094 patients with thyroid nodules were referred for ultrasound at a University Hospital. Data on clinical, ultrasound, cytological, and histopathological parameters were collected. Nodules ≥20 mm were categorized by EU-TIRADS and ACR-TIRADS, and their predictive performance for malignancy was assessed through postthyroidectomy histopathology or FNA cytology (Bethesda classification).
Results: Two hundred sixty-seven patients (mean age 60.3 ± 14.3 years; 46 men, 221 women) with 308 nodules were analyzed. Twenty-two malignancies and 286 benign nodules were recorded. Recalculating European Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System 3 performance using 25-mm and 30-mm thresholds (ACR-modified EU-TIRADS) avoided 24% and 41% of FNAs, respectively, while ACR-TIRADS would prevent 26.6% (P > .05). Two malignancies were missed.
Conclusion: EU-TIRADS and ACR-TIRADS show similar efficacy when using a 25 mm FNA threshold. Raising the cutoff for FNA in European Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System 3 nodules could reduce unnecessary procedures but may increase the risk of missed malignancies, impacting patient outcomes.