首页 > 最新文献

Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences最新文献

英文 中文
Age-specific prevalence and predictors of lifetime suicide attempts using machine learning in Chinese adults: a nationwide multi-centre survey. 在中国成年人中使用机器学习的特定年龄患病率和终生自杀企图的预测因素:一项全国性的多中心调查。
IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-10-20 DOI: 10.1017/S2045796025100231
Yu Wu, Yihao Zhao, Panliang Zhong, Chen Chen, Yibo Wu, Xiaoying Zheng

Aims: The epidemiology and age-specific patterns of lifetime suicide attempts (LSA) in China remain unclear. We aimed to examine age-specific prevalence and predictors of LSA among Chinese adults using machine learning (ML).

Methods: We analyzed 25,047 adults in the 2024 Psychology and Behavior Investigation of Chinese Residents (PBICR-2024), stratified into three age groups (18-24, 25-44, ≥ 45 years). Thirty-seven candidate predictors across six domains-sociodemographic, physical health, mental health, lifestyle, social environment, and self-injury/suicide history-were assessed. Five ML models-random forest, logistic regression, support vector machine (SVM), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Naive Bayes-were compared. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were used to quantify feature importance.

Results: The overall prevalence of LSA was 4.57% (1,145/25,047), with significant age differences: 8.10% in young adults (18-24), 4.67% in adults aged 25-44, and 2.67% in older adults (≥45). SVM achieved the best test-set performance across all ages [area under the curve (AUC) 0.88-0.94, sensitivity 0.79-0.87, specificity 0.81-0.88], showing superior calibration and net clinical benefit. SHAP analysis identified both shared and age-specific predictors. Suicidal ideation, adverse childhood experiences, and suicide disclosure were consistent top predictors across all ages. Sleep disturbances and anxiety symptoms stood out in young adults; marital status, living alone, and perceived stress in mid-life; and functional limitations, poor sleep, and depressive symptoms in older adults.

Conclusions: LSA prevalence in Chinese adults is relatively high, with a clear age gradient peaking in young adulthood. Risk profiles revealed both shared and age-specific predictors, reflecting distinct life-stage vulnerabilities. These findings support age-tailored suicide prevention strategies in China.

目的:中国终生自杀企图(LSA)的流行病学和年龄特征尚不清楚。我们的目的是利用机器学习(ML)研究中国成年人中LSA的年龄特异性患病率和预测因素。方法:对参与2024年中国居民心理与行为调查(PBICR-2024)的25,047名成年人进行分析,将其分为18-24岁、25-44岁和≥45岁三个年龄组。评估了社会人口统计学、身体健康、心理健康、生活方式、社会环境和自残/自杀史等6个领域的37个候选预测因子。五种机器学习模型——随机森林、逻辑回归、支持向量机(SVM)、极端梯度增强(XGBoost)和朴素贝叶斯——进行了比较。SHapley加性解释(SHAP)用于量化特征的重要性。结果:LSA的总患病率为4.57%(1,145/25,047),年龄差异显著:青壮年(18-24岁)为8.10%,25-44岁为4.67%,老年人(≥45岁)为2.67%。支持向量机在所有年龄段的测试集表现最佳[曲线下面积(AUC) 0.88-0.94,灵敏度0.79-0.87,特异性0.81-0.88],显示出优越的校准和临床净效益。SHAP分析确定了共同的和特定年龄的预测因子。自杀意念、不良童年经历和自杀披露在所有年龄段都是一致的预测因子。睡眠障碍和焦虑症状在年轻人中尤为突出;婚姻状况、独居与中年压力感知;以及老年人的功能限制、睡眠不足和抑郁症状。结论:中国成年人的LSA患病率相对较高,年龄梯度明显,在青年期达到高峰。风险概况揭示了共同的和特定年龄的预测因素,反映了不同的生命阶段的脆弱性。这些发现支持了中国针对不同年龄的自杀预防策略。
{"title":"Age-specific prevalence and predictors of lifetime suicide attempts using machine learning in Chinese adults: a nationwide multi-centre survey.","authors":"Yu Wu, Yihao Zhao, Panliang Zhong, Chen Chen, Yibo Wu, Xiaoying Zheng","doi":"10.1017/S2045796025100231","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S2045796025100231","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The epidemiology and age-specific patterns of lifetime suicide attempts (LSA) in China remain unclear. We aimed to examine age-specific prevalence and predictors of LSA among Chinese adults using machine learning (ML).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 25,047 adults in the 2024 Psychology and Behavior Investigation of Chinese Residents (PBICR-2024), stratified into three age groups (18-24, 25-44, ≥ 45 years). Thirty-seven candidate predictors across six domains-sociodemographic, physical health, mental health, lifestyle, social environment, and self-injury/suicide history-were assessed. Five ML models-random forest, logistic regression, support vector machine (SVM), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Naive Bayes-were compared. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were used to quantify feature importance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall prevalence of LSA was 4.57% (1,145/25,047), with significant age differences: 8.10% in young adults (18-24), 4.67% in adults aged 25-44, and 2.67% in older adults (≥45). SVM achieved the best test-set performance across all ages [area under the curve (AUC) 0.88-0.94, sensitivity 0.79-0.87, specificity 0.81-0.88], showing superior calibration and net clinical benefit. SHAP analysis identified both shared and age-specific predictors. Suicidal ideation, adverse childhood experiences, and suicide disclosure were consistent top predictors across all ages. Sleep disturbances and anxiety symptoms stood out in young adults; marital status, living alone, and perceived stress in mid-life; and functional limitations, poor sleep, and depressive symptoms in older adults.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LSA prevalence in Chinese adults is relatively high, with a clear age gradient peaking in young adulthood. Risk profiles revealed both shared and age-specific predictors, reflecting distinct life-stage vulnerabilities. These findings support age-tailored suicide prevention strategies in China.</p>","PeriodicalId":11787,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","volume":"34 ","pages":"e52"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12555083/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145328186","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mental health symptoms and associated factors for general population at the stable, recurrence, and end-of-emergency stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: a repeated national cross-sectional study. 在COVID-19大流行的稳定、复发和紧急结束阶段,普通人群的精神健康症状和相关因素:一项重复的全国横断面研究
IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-10-14 DOI: 10.1017/S2045796025100243
Shu Wang, Yuan Zhang, Wei Ding, Yao Meng, Huiting Hu, Yuguang Guan, Xianwei Zeng, Zhenhua Liu, Fangang Meng, Minzhong Wang, Jianguo Zhang

Aims: The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated psychological distress, but limited information is available on the shifts in mental health symptoms and their associated factors across different stages. This study was conducted to more reliably estimate shifts in mental health impacts and to identify factors associated with symptoms at different pandemic stages.

Methods: We performed a national repeated cross-sectional study at stable (2021), recurrence (2022), and end-of-emergency (2023) stages based on representative general national population with extensive geographic coverage. Anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and insomnia symptoms were evaluated by GAD-7, PHQ-9, IES-R and ISI scales, respectively, and their associated factors were identified via multivariable linear regression.

Results: Generally, 42,000 individuals were recruited, and 36,218, 36,097 and 36,306 eligible participants were included at each stage. The prevalence of anxiety, depression and insomnia symptoms increased from 13.7-16.4% at stable to 17.3-22.2% at recurrence and decreased to 14.5-18.6% at end of emergency, while PTSD symptom continuously increased from 5.1% to 7.6% and 9.2%, respectively (all significant, P < 0.001). Common factors associated with mental health symptoms across all stages included centralized quarantine, frontline work and residence in initially widely infected areas. Centralized quarantine was linked to anxiety, depression, PTSD and insomnia during the stable, recurrence and end-of-emergency stages. Frontline workers exhibited higher risks of anxiety, depression and insomnia throughout these stages. Individuals in initially widely infected areas were more likely to experience depression and PTSD, particularly during the stable and recurrence stages. Stage-specific risk factors were also identified. Lack of outdoor activity was associated with anxiety, depression and insomnia during the stable and recurrence stages. Residents in high-risk areas during the recurrence stage correlated with increased anxiety and insomnia. Suspected infection was tied to anxiety and insomnia in the recurrence and end-of-emergency stages, while the death of family or friends was linked to PTSD during recurrence and to depression, PTSD and insomnia at the end-of-emergency stage.

Conclusions: Mental health symptoms increased when pandemic recurred, and could remain after end-of-emergency, requiring prolonged interventions. Several key factors associated with mental symptoms and their variations were identified at different pandemic stages, suggesting different at-risk populations.

目的:COVID-19大流行加剧了心理困扰,但关于心理健康症状及其相关因素在不同阶段的变化的信息有限。进行这项研究是为了更可靠地估计心理健康影响的变化,并确定在不同大流行阶段与症状相关的因素。方法:我们在稳定(2021年)、复发(2022年)和紧急结束(2023年)阶段进行了一项全国性的重复横断面研究,该研究基于具有广泛地理覆盖的代表性的全国普通人群。分别采用GAD-7、PHQ-9、IES-R和ISI量表评估焦虑、抑郁、创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和失眠症状,并通过多变量线性回归确定其相关因素。结果:总的来说,共招募了42,000人,每个阶段分别包括36,218,36,097和36,306名符合条件的参与者。焦虑、抑郁和失眠症状的患病率从稳定时的13.7-16.4%上升到复发时的17.3-22.2%,在急症结束时下降到14.5-18.6%,而PTSD症状分别从5.1%持续上升到7.6%和9.2% (P均具有显著性,P结论:精神健康症状在大流行复发时增加,并且在急症结束后可能持续存在,需要延长干预时间。在不同的大流行阶段确定了与精神症状及其变化相关的几个关键因素,这表明存在不同的风险人群。
{"title":"Mental health symptoms and associated factors for general population at the stable, recurrence, and end-of-emergency stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: a repeated national cross-sectional study.","authors":"Shu Wang, Yuan Zhang, Wei Ding, Yao Meng, Huiting Hu, Yuguang Guan, Xianwei Zeng, Zhenhua Liu, Fangang Meng, Minzhong Wang, Jianguo Zhang","doi":"10.1017/S2045796025100243","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S2045796025100243","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated psychological distress, but limited information is available on the shifts in mental health symptoms and their associated factors across different stages. This study was conducted to more reliably estimate shifts in mental health impacts and to identify factors associated with symptoms at different pandemic stages.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a national repeated cross-sectional study at stable (2021), recurrence (2022), and end-of-emergency (2023) stages based on representative general national population with extensive geographic coverage. Anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and insomnia symptoms were evaluated by GAD-7, PHQ-9, IES-R and ISI scales, respectively, and their associated factors were identified via multivariable linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Generally, 42,000 individuals were recruited, and 36,218, 36,097 and 36,306 eligible participants were included at each stage. The prevalence of anxiety, depression and insomnia symptoms increased from 13.7-16.4% at stable to 17.3-22.2% at recurrence and decreased to 14.5-18.6% at end of emergency, while PTSD symptom continuously increased from 5.1% to 7.6% and 9.2%, respectively (all significant, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Common factors associated with mental health symptoms across all stages included centralized quarantine, frontline work and residence in initially widely infected areas. Centralized quarantine was linked to anxiety, depression, PTSD and insomnia during the stable, recurrence and end-of-emergency stages. Frontline workers exhibited higher risks of anxiety, depression and insomnia throughout these stages. Individuals in initially widely infected areas were more likely to experience depression and PTSD, particularly during the stable and recurrence stages. Stage-specific risk factors were also identified. Lack of outdoor activity was associated with anxiety, depression and insomnia during the stable and recurrence stages. Residents in high-risk areas during the recurrence stage correlated with increased anxiety and insomnia. Suspected infection was tied to anxiety and insomnia in the recurrence and end-of-emergency stages, while the death of family or friends was linked to PTSD during recurrence and to depression, PTSD and insomnia at the end-of-emergency stage.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mental health symptoms increased when pandemic recurred, and could remain after end-of-emergency, requiring prolonged interventions. Several key factors associated with mental symptoms and their variations were identified at different pandemic stages, suggesting different at-risk populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":11787,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","volume":"34 ","pages":"e50"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12555081/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145285840","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Epidemiology of psychiatric disorders in Texas prisons from 2016 to 2023. 2016 - 2023年德克萨斯州监狱精神疾病流行病学研究
IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-10-14 DOI: 10.1017/S2045796025100267
Rocksheng Zhong, Myrna Serna, Jeffrey Farroni, Biai Digbeu, Gwen Baillargeon, John Pulvino, Joseph Penn, Owen Murray, Jacques Baillargeon

Aims: Although the United States incarcerates nearly two million people, the epidemiology of psychiatric disorders in correctional populations is not well understood, and no study has examined temporal trends in psychiatric disorder prevalences within a single correctional system. This study assessed how psychiatric disorder prevalences have changed in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ), the largest American state prison system housing post-conviction, sentenced individuals.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study of TDCJ electronic medical record data from 1 January 2016 through 31 December 2023 included all persons incarcerated for any duration during that period. Diagnoses were based on International Classification of Disease (ICD-10) diagnostic codes. Outcomes were annual prevalences of depressive, bipolar and schizophrenia spectrum disorders stratified by age, race and sex. Cochran-Armitage Tests were used to assess temporal trends within each stratum. Two-way interactions were assessed by fitting Generalized Estimating Equations models using autoregressive correlation with repeated subjects.

Results: The overall population ranged from 170,269 to 222,798 individuals. Approximately, one-third were White (34.5-35.4%), one-third Black (31.0-32.3%), and one-third Hispanic (32.7-33.5%). Most were aged 30-49 (52.8-57.3%), and men (88.9-90.7%) outnumbered women (9.3-11.1%). The prevalences (per 100 [95% CI]) of psychiatric disorders generally increased when comparing 2016 to 2023. Depressive disorders increased the most among those aged 30-49 (5.23 [5.10-5.35] to 6.71 [6.56-6.86]), Hispanic individuals (3.86 [3.72-4.00] to 5.72 [5.53-5.90]), and men (4.72 [4.63-4.82] to 6.53 [6.42-6.65]). Bipolar disorders increased the most among those aged ≥50 (2.57 [2.42-2.72] to 3.46 [3.29-3.63]), Hispanic individuals (1.31 [1.23-1.40] to 2.23 [2.11-2.35]), and men (2.26 [2.20-2.33] to 3.12 [3.04-3.20]). Schizophrenia spectrum disorders increased the most among those aged ≤29 (1.33 [1.24-1.42] to 2.52 [2.35-2.68]), Hispanic individuals (1.53 [1.44-1.62] to 3.21 [3.35-4.40]), and women (1.27 [1.56-1.89] to 4.24 [3.95-4.53]). When stratified by demographic variables, trend tests were significant for nearly all comparisons (P < 0.0001), and all two-way interactions were significant (P < 0.0001).

Conclusions: The prevalences of major psychiatric disorders in the Texas prison system increased when comparing 2016 to 2023, with certain disorders rising more rapidly than others within specific subgroups. These findings emphasize the need for expanded mental health treatment options and resources within correctional settings.

目的:尽管美国有近200万人被监禁,但在监狱服刑的人群中,精神疾病的流行病学并没有得到很好的了解,也没有研究在单个监狱系统中检查精神疾病流行的时间趋势。这项研究评估了德克萨斯州刑事司法部门(TDCJ)的精神疾病患病率是如何变化的,该部门是美国最大的州监狱系统,关押着定罪后被判刑的人。方法:对2016年1月1日至2023年12月31日TDCJ电子病历数据进行回顾性队列研究,包括在此期间被监禁的所有人员。诊断依据国际疾病分类(ICD-10)诊断代码。结果是按年龄、种族和性别分层的抑郁症、双相情感障碍和精神分裂症谱系障碍的年患病率。Cochran-Armitage检验用于评估每个地层的时间趋势。通过与重复受试者的自回归相关拟合广义估计方程模型来评估双向相互作用。结果:种群总数为170,269 ~ 222,798人。大约三分之一是白人(34.5-35.4%),三分之一是黑人(31.0-32.3%),三分之一是西班牙裔(32.7-33.5%)。大多数患者年龄在30-49岁(52.8-57.3%),男性(88.9-90.7%)多于女性(9.3-11.1%)。与2016年相比,精神疾病的患病率(每100 [95% CI])普遍增加。抑郁症在30-49岁人群中增加最多(5.23[5.10-5.35]至6.71[6.56-6.86]),西班牙裔人群(3.86[3.72-4.00]至5.72[5.53-5.90]),男性人群(4.72[4.63-4.82]至6.53[6.42-6.65])。双相情感障碍在≥50岁人群(2.57[2.42-2.72]~ 3.46[3.29-3.63])、西班牙裔人群(1.31[1.23-1.40]~ 2.23[2.11-2.35])和男性人群(2.26[2.20-2.33]~ 3.12[3.04-3.20])中增加最多。精神分裂症谱系障碍在年龄≤29岁人群(1.33[1.24-1.42]~ 2.52[2.35-2.68])、西班牙裔人群(1.53[1.44-1.62]~ 3.21[3.35-4.40])、女性人群(1.27[1.56-1.89]~ 4.24[3.95-4.53])中增加最多。当按人口统计学变量分层时,趋势检验对几乎所有比较都具有显著意义(P P结论:2016年与2023年相比,德克萨斯州监狱系统中主要精神疾病的患病率有所增加,某些疾病在特定亚组中比其他疾病上升得更快。这些发现强调了在惩教环境中扩大心理健康治疗选择和资源的必要性。
{"title":"Epidemiology of psychiatric disorders in Texas prisons from 2016 to 2023.","authors":"Rocksheng Zhong, Myrna Serna, Jeffrey Farroni, Biai Digbeu, Gwen Baillargeon, John Pulvino, Joseph Penn, Owen Murray, Jacques Baillargeon","doi":"10.1017/S2045796025100267","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S2045796025100267","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Although the United States incarcerates nearly two million people, the epidemiology of psychiatric disorders in correctional populations is not well understood, and no study has examined temporal trends in psychiatric disorder prevalences within a single correctional system. This study assessed how psychiatric disorder prevalences have changed in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ), the largest American state prison system housing post-conviction, sentenced individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study of TDCJ electronic medical record data from 1 January 2016 through 31 December 2023 included all persons incarcerated for any duration during that period. Diagnoses were based on International Classification of Disease (ICD-10) diagnostic codes. Outcomes were annual prevalences of depressive, bipolar and schizophrenia spectrum disorders stratified by age, race and sex. Cochran-Armitage Tests were used to assess temporal trends within each stratum. Two-way interactions were assessed by fitting Generalized Estimating Equations models using autoregressive correlation with repeated subjects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall population ranged from 170,269 to 222,798 individuals. Approximately, one-third were White (34.5-35.4%), one-third Black (31.0-32.3%), and one-third Hispanic (32.7-33.5%). Most were aged 30-49 (52.8-57.3%), and men (88.9-90.7%) outnumbered women (9.3-11.1%). The prevalences (per 100 [95% CI]) of psychiatric disorders generally increased when comparing 2016 to 2023. Depressive disorders increased the most among those aged 30-49 (5.23 [5.10-5.35] to 6.71 [6.56-6.86]), Hispanic individuals (3.86 [3.72-4.00] to 5.72 [5.53-5.90]), and men (4.72 [4.63-4.82] to 6.53 [6.42-6.65]). Bipolar disorders increased the most among those aged ≥50 (2.57 [2.42-2.72] to 3.46 [3.29-3.63]), Hispanic individuals (1.31 [1.23-1.40] to 2.23 [2.11-2.35]), and men (2.26 [2.20-2.33] to 3.12 [3.04-3.20]). Schizophrenia spectrum disorders increased the most among those aged ≤29 (1.33 [1.24-1.42] to 2.52 [2.35-2.68]), Hispanic individuals (1.53 [1.44-1.62] to 3.21 [3.35-4.40]), and women (1.27 [1.56-1.89] to 4.24 [3.95-4.53]). When stratified by demographic variables, trend tests were significant for nearly all comparisons (<i>P</i> < 0.0001), and all two-way interactions were significant (<i>P</i> < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The prevalences of major psychiatric disorders in the Texas prison system increased when comparing 2016 to 2023, with certain disorders rising more rapidly than others within specific subgroups. These findings emphasize the need for expanded mental health treatment options and resources within correctional settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":11787,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","volume":"34 ","pages":"e51"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12555086/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145285890","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The effects of parental adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and childhood threat and deprivation on adolescent depression and anxiety: an analysis of the longitudinal study of Australian children. 父母不良童年经历和童年威胁与剥夺对青少年抑郁和焦虑的影响:对澳大利亚儿童的纵向研究分析。
IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-10-06 DOI: 10.1017/S2045796025100255
Santosh Giri, Nancy Ross, Rachel Kornhaber, Kedir Y Ahmed, Subash Thapa

Aims: Evidence on the effects of parental Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) on adolescent mental health remains limited. This study investigates the associations between parental ACEs, children's exposure to threat- and deprivation-related ACEs, and adolescent depression and anxiety using data from the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children.

Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children (LSAC), a population-based longitudinal cohort study. Parental ACEs were retrospectively reported by caregivers. Children's exposure to ACEs was assessed from ages 4-17 years and categorised as threat-related ACEs (e.g., bullying, hostile parenting, unsafe neighbourhoods, family violence) or deprivation-related ACEs (e.g., financial hardship, parental substance abuse, parental psychological distress, death of a family member, parental separation, parental legal problems). Depressive and anxiety symptoms were self-reported by adolescents at ages between 12 and 17 years. Modified Poisson regression models were used to examine the independent and combined associations of parental ACEs and children's threat- and deprivation-related ACEs (assessed before ages 12, 14, and 16 years) with depression and anxiety outcomes, including tests for interaction effects.

Results: The analysis included 3,956 children aged 12-13 years, 3,357 children aged 14-15 years, and 3,089 children aged 16-17 years. Males comprised 50.8-59.8% and females 40.2-49.2% across all ages. By the age of 17, 30.4% and 9.4% of the adolescents had depression and anxiety, respectively. Parental ACEs (≥2) were associated with increased depression risk at ages 12 to 13 years (RR = 1.42; 95% CI: 1.10-1.84) and at 16-17 years (RR = 1.19; 95% CI: 1.02-1.39). Exposure to ≥ 2 deprivation-related ACEs significantly increased the risk of depression across all ages, with relative risks ranging from 1.31 to 2.18. High threat-related ACEs (≥2) were associated with increased depression risk only at 12 to 13 years (RR = 2.01; 95% CI: 1.28-3.17). No significant interactions were observed.

Conclusions: The findings reinforce the ACEs model by showing that, at the population level, early identification of children exposed to early life deprivations rooted in financial crisis or familial adversities, combined with targeted interventions for both children and parents and supportive social policies, can reduce long-term mental health risks.

目的:关于父母不良童年经历(ace)对青少年心理健康影响的证据仍然有限。本研究利用澳大利亚儿童纵向研究的数据,调查了父母的不良经历、儿童暴露于威胁和剥夺相关的不良经历以及青少年抑郁和焦虑之间的关系。方法:我们对澳大利亚儿童纵向研究(LSAC)进行了二次分析,这是一项基于人群的纵向队列研究。父母ace由照顾者回顾性报告。对4-17岁儿童的不良经历进行评估,并将其分为与威胁相关的不良经历(如欺凌、敌对父母、不安全社区、家庭暴力)或与剥夺相关的不良经历(如经济困难、父母滥用药物、父母心理困扰、家庭成员死亡、父母分居、父母法律问题)。抑郁和焦虑症状由12至17岁的青少年自我报告。使用修正泊松回归模型来检查父母ace和儿童威胁和剥夺相关ace(在12岁、14岁和16岁之前评估)与抑郁和焦虑结局的独立和联合关联,包括相互作用效应的测试。结果:共纳入12-13岁儿童3956例,14-15岁儿童3357例,16-17岁儿童3089例。男性占50.8-59.8%,女性占40.2-49.2%。到17岁时,30.4%和9.4%的青少年分别出现抑郁和焦虑。父母ace(≥2)与12 - 13岁(RR = 1.42; 95% CI: 1.10-1.84)和16-17岁(RR = 1.19; 95% CI: 1.02-1.39)抑郁风险增加相关。暴露于≥2次与剥夺相关的不良经历显著增加了所有年龄段的抑郁症风险,相对风险范围为1.31至2.18。高威胁相关ace(≥2)仅在12 ~ 13年时与抑郁风险增加相关(RR = 2.01; 95% CI: 1.28 ~ 3.17)。未观察到显著的相互作用。结论:研究结果强化了ace模型,表明在人口水平上,早期识别因金融危机或家庭逆境而面临早期生活剥夺的儿童,结合对儿童和父母的有针对性的干预措施以及支持性社会政策,可以降低长期的心理健康风险。
{"title":"The effects of parental adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and childhood threat and deprivation on adolescent depression and anxiety: an analysis of the longitudinal study of Australian children.","authors":"Santosh Giri, Nancy Ross, Rachel Kornhaber, Kedir Y Ahmed, Subash Thapa","doi":"10.1017/S2045796025100255","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S2045796025100255","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Evidence on the effects of parental Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) on adolescent mental health remains limited. This study investigates the associations between parental ACEs, children's exposure to threat- and deprivation-related ACEs, and adolescent depression and anxiety using data from the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a secondary analysis of the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children (LSAC), a population-based longitudinal cohort study. Parental ACEs were retrospectively reported by caregivers. Children's exposure to ACEs was assessed from ages 4-17 years and categorised as threat-related ACEs (e.g., bullying, hostile parenting, unsafe neighbourhoods, family violence) or deprivation-related ACEs (e.g., financial hardship, parental substance abuse, parental psychological distress, death of a family member, parental separation, parental legal problems). Depressive and anxiety symptoms were self-reported by adolescents at ages between 12 and 17 years. Modified Poisson regression models were used to examine the independent and combined associations of parental ACEs and children's threat- and deprivation-related ACEs (assessed before ages 12, 14, and 16 years) with depression and anxiety outcomes, including tests for interaction effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 3,956 children aged 12-13 years, 3,357 children aged 14-15 years, and 3,089 children aged 16-17 years. Males comprised 50.8-59.8% and females 40.2-49.2% across all ages. By the age of 17, 30.4% and 9.4% of the adolescents had depression and anxiety, respectively. Parental ACEs (≥2) were associated with increased depression risk at ages 12 to 13 years (RR = 1.42; 95% CI: 1.10-1.84) and at 16-17 years (RR = 1.19; 95% CI: 1.02-1.39). Exposure to ≥ 2 deprivation-related ACEs significantly increased the risk of depression across all ages, with relative risks ranging from 1.31 to 2.18. High threat-related ACEs (≥2) were associated with increased depression risk only at 12 to 13 years (RR = 2.01; 95% CI: 1.28-3.17). No significant interactions were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings reinforce the ACEs model by showing that, at the population level, early identification of children exposed to early life deprivations rooted in financial crisis or familial adversities, combined with targeted interventions for both children and parents and supportive social policies, can reduce long-term mental health risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":11787,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","volume":"34 ","pages":"e49"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12555079/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145231748","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Predictive role of loneliness on mortality before the age 85 years among mid- to later-life adults in the United States: a 10-year retrospective cohort study. 孤独感对85岁前美国中老年人群死亡率的预测作用:一项10年回顾性队列研究。
IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-09-11 DOI: 10.1017/S2045796025100188
Hui-Ying Fan, Mu-Rui Zheng, Qinge Zhang, Sha Sha, Yuan Feng, Zhaohui Su, Teris Cheung, Gabor S Ungvari, Lloyd Balbuena, Yu-Tao Xiang

Aims: Loneliness is a common public health concern, particularly among mid- to later-life adults. However, its impact on early mortality (deaths occurring before reaching the oldest old age of 85 years) remains underexplored. This study examined the predictive role of loneliness on early mortality across different age groups using data from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS).

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the 2010-2020 waves of the HRS, restricted to participants aged 50-84 years at baseline. Loneliness was measured using the 11-item UCLA Loneliness Scale, categorized into four levels: low/no loneliness (scores 11-13), mild loneliness (14-16), moderate loneliness (17-20) and severe loneliness (21-33). Cox proportional hazards models and time-varying Cox regression models with age as the time scale were created to evaluate the relationship between loneliness and early mortality, adjusting for sociodemographic, lifestyle, and physical and mental health factors.

Results: Among 6,392 participants, the overall mortality rate before the age of 85 years was 19.1 per 1,000 person-years. A dose-response relationship was observed, with moderate and severe loneliness associated with 23% (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.02-1.48) and 36% (aHR: 1.36, 95% CI = 1.13-1.65) higher mortality risk, respectively. Significant associations existed for the 65-74-year-old (aHR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.03-1.83) and 75-84-year-old (aHR = 1.77, 95% CI = 1.23-2.56) age groups in the fully-adjusted models, but not for the 50-64-year-old age group. Time-varying Cox models showed a stronger association for severe loneliness (aHR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.37-1.99).

Conclusions: Loneliness is a significant predictor of mortality among older adults. Preventive and interventional programs targeting loneliness may promote healthy ageing.

目的:孤独是一种常见的公共健康问题,特别是在中老年成年人中。然而,它对早期死亡(在达到85岁高龄之前死亡)的影响仍未得到充分探讨。本研究利用健康与退休研究(HRS)的数据,研究了孤独对不同年龄组早期死亡率的预测作用。方法:采用2010-2020年HRS数据进行回顾性队列研究,受试者基线年龄为50-84岁。孤独感的测量采用UCLA孤独感量表,分为四个等级:低/无孤独感(11-13分)、轻度孤独感(14-16分)、中度孤独感(17-20分)和重度孤独感(21-33分)。建立Cox比例风险模型和以年龄为时间尺度的时变Cox回归模型来评估孤独与早期死亡率之间的关系,并对社会人口统计学、生活方式和身心健康因素进行调整。结果:在6392名参与者中,85岁前的总死亡率为19.1 / 1000人年。观察到剂量-反应关系,中度和重度孤独感分别与23%(校正风险比[aHR]: 1.23, 95%可信区间[CI] = 1.02-1.48)和36% (aHR: 1.36, 95% CI = 1.13-1.65)的高死亡风险相关。在完全调整模型中,65-74岁年龄组(aHR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.03-1.83)和75-84岁年龄组(aHR = 1.77, 95% CI = 1.23-2.56)存在显著相关性,但50-64岁年龄组不存在显著相关性。随时间变化的Cox模型显示,重度孤独感的相关性更强(aHR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.37 ~ 1.99)。结论:孤独是老年人死亡率的重要预测因子。针对孤独的预防和干预方案可以促进健康老龄化。
{"title":"Predictive role of loneliness on mortality before the age 85 years among mid- to later-life adults in the United States: a 10-year retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Hui-Ying Fan, Mu-Rui Zheng, Qinge Zhang, Sha Sha, Yuan Feng, Zhaohui Su, Teris Cheung, Gabor S Ungvari, Lloyd Balbuena, Yu-Tao Xiang","doi":"10.1017/S2045796025100188","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S2045796025100188","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Loneliness is a common public health concern, particularly among mid- to later-life adults. However, its impact on early mortality (deaths occurring before reaching the oldest old age of 85 years) remains underexplored. This study examined the predictive role of loneliness on early mortality across different age groups using data from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the 2010-2020 waves of the HRS, restricted to participants aged 50-84 years at baseline. Loneliness was measured using the 11-item UCLA Loneliness Scale, categorized into four levels: low/no loneliness (scores 11-13), mild loneliness (14-16), moderate loneliness (17-20) and severe loneliness (21-33). Cox proportional hazards models and time-varying Cox regression models with age as the time scale were created to evaluate the relationship between loneliness and early mortality, adjusting for sociodemographic, lifestyle, and physical and mental health factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 6,392 participants, the overall mortality rate before the age of 85 years was 19.1 per 1,000 person-years. A dose-response relationship was observed, with moderate and severe loneliness associated with 23% (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.02-1.48) and 36% (aHR: 1.36, 95% CI = 1.13-1.65) higher mortality risk, respectively. Significant associations existed for the 65-74-year-old (aHR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.03-1.83) and 75-84-year-old (aHR = 1.77, 95% CI = 1.23-2.56) age groups in the fully-adjusted models, but not for the 50-64-year-old age group. Time-varying Cox models showed a stronger association for severe loneliness (aHR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.37-1.99).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Loneliness is a significant predictor of mortality among older adults. Preventive and interventional programs targeting loneliness may promote healthy ageing.</p>","PeriodicalId":11787,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","volume":"34 ","pages":"e48"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12450537/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145033068","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Environmental risk factors for schizophrenia spectrum disorders around the globe: a mapping review of the literature. 全球范围内精神分裂症谱系障碍的环境风险因素:文献综述。
IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-09-05 DOI: 10.1017/S204579602510022X
Sarah Tosato, Branko Ristic, Alice Zanini, Simone Schimmenti, Francesca Maria Camilla Maselli, Evangelos Vassos

Aims: There is a substantial body of literature on environmental risk associated with schizophrenia. Most research has largely been conducted in Europe and North America, with little representation of the rest of the world; hence generalisability of findings is questionable. For this reason, we performed a mapping review of studies on environmental risk for schizophrenia spectrum disorders, recording the country where they were conducted, and we linked our findings with publicly available data to identify correlates with the uneven global distribution. Our aim was to evaluate how universal is the 'common knowledge' of environmental risk for psychosis collating the availability of evidence across different countries and to generate suggestions for future research identifying gaps in evidence.

Methods: We performed a systematic search and mapping of studies in the PubMed and PsycINFO electronic databases reporting on exposure to environmental risk for schizophrenia including obstetric complications, paternal age, migration, urbanicity, childhood trauma, and cannabis use and subsequent onset of schizophrenia spectrum disorders. This search focused on articles published from the date of the first available publication until 31 May 2023. We recorded the country where they were conducted. We downloaded publicly available data on population size, measures of wealth, medical provisions, research investment, and of quality research outputs per country and performed regression analyses of each predictor with the number of studies and recruited cases in each country.

Results: We identified 308 publications that included a sample size of 445,000 patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. The majority were conducted in northern Europe and North America, with large parts of the world totally unrepresented. In the associations between the number of environmental risk studies for schizophrenia with potential predictors, we found that neither population nor wealth or research investment were strong predictors of research outputs in the field. Interestingly, the stronger correlations were found for number of researchers per population and for indicators of top-end scientific achievements, such as number of Nobel laureates per country.

Conclusions: Our results demonstrate a gap of knowledge due to the underrepresentation of studies on environmental risk of schizophrenia spectrum disorders in large parts of the world. This has implications not only in the generalisability of any findings from research conducted in the Northern hemisphere but also in our ability to progress in efforts to make causal inferences about biological pathways to schizophrenia. These findings reinforce the need to focus research on populations that are underrepresented in research and underserved in health care.

目的:有大量的文献表明环境风险与精神分裂症有关。大多数研究主要是在欧洲和北美进行的,很少代表世界其他地区;因此,研究结果的普遍性值得怀疑。出于这个原因,我们对精神分裂症谱系障碍的环境风险研究进行了一次地图审查,记录了进行这些研究的国家,并将我们的发现与公开可用的数据联系起来,以确定与全球分布不平衡的相关性。我们的目的是评估精神病环境风险的“常识”有多普遍,整理不同国家的证据可用性,并为未来的研究提出建议,确定证据的差距。方法:我们对PubMed和PsycINFO电子数据库中有关暴露于精神分裂症环境风险的研究进行了系统的搜索和绘制,包括产科并发症、父亲年龄、移民、城市化、童年创伤、大麻使用和随后的精神分裂症谱系障碍发病。该搜索集中于从第一次可用出版物日期到2023年5月31日发表的文章。我们记录了进行这些实验的国家。我们下载了各国人口规模、财富指标、医疗条件、研究投资和高质量研究产出的公开数据,并对每个预测指标进行了回归分析,包括每个国家的研究数量和招募病例。结果:我们确定了308份出版物,其中包括44.5万名精神分裂症谱系障碍患者的样本量。大多数是在北欧和北美进行的,世界上大部分地区完全没有代表。在精神分裂症环境风险研究数量与潜在预测因子之间的关联中,我们发现人口、财富或研究投资都不是该领域研究成果的强预测因子。有趣的是,研究人员的人均数量和顶级科学成就指标(如每个国家的诺贝尔奖获得者数量)之间的相关性更强。结论:我们的结果表明,由于世界上大部分地区对精神分裂症谱系障碍环境风险的研究代表性不足,存在知识缺口。这不仅对在北半球进行的任何研究结果的普遍性有影响,而且对我们在精神分裂症生物学途径的因果推论方面取得进展的能力也有影响。这些发现加强了将研究重点放在研究中代表性不足和卫生保健服务不足的人群上的必要性。
{"title":"Environmental risk factors for schizophrenia spectrum disorders around the globe: a mapping review of the literature.","authors":"Sarah Tosato, Branko Ristic, Alice Zanini, Simone Schimmenti, Francesca Maria Camilla Maselli, Evangelos Vassos","doi":"10.1017/S204579602510022X","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S204579602510022X","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>There is a substantial body of literature on environmental risk associated with schizophrenia. Most research has largely been conducted in Europe and North America, with little representation of the rest of the world; hence generalisability of findings is questionable. For this reason, we performed a mapping review of studies on environmental risk for schizophrenia spectrum disorders, recording the country where they were conducted, and we linked our findings with publicly available data to identify correlates with the uneven global distribution. Our aim was to evaluate how universal is the 'common knowledge' of environmental risk for psychosis collating the availability of evidence across different countries and to generate suggestions for future research identifying gaps in evidence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic search and mapping of studies in the PubMed and PsycINFO electronic databases reporting on exposure to environmental risk for schizophrenia including obstetric complications, paternal age, migration, urbanicity, childhood trauma, and cannabis use and subsequent onset of schizophrenia spectrum disorders. This search focused on articles published from the date of the first available publication until 31 May 2023. We recorded the country where they were conducted. We downloaded publicly available data on population size, measures of wealth, medical provisions, research investment, and of quality research outputs per country and performed regression analyses of each predictor with the number of studies and recruited cases in each country.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 308 publications that included a sample size of 445,000 patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. The majority were conducted in northern Europe and North America, with large parts of the world totally unrepresented. In the associations between the number of environmental risk studies for schizophrenia with potential predictors, we found that neither population nor wealth or research investment were strong predictors of research outputs in the field. Interestingly, the stronger correlations were found for number of researchers per population and for indicators of top-end scientific achievements, such as number of Nobel laureates per country.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results demonstrate a gap of knowledge due to the underrepresentation of studies on environmental risk of schizophrenia spectrum disorders in large parts of the world. This has implications not only in the generalisability of any findings from research conducted in the Northern hemisphere but also in our ability to progress in efforts to make causal inferences about biological pathways to schizophrenia. These findings reinforce the need to focus research on populations that are underrepresented in research and underserved in health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":11787,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","volume":"34 ","pages":"e47"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12450536/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144999896","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Decomposing the change of suicide rates in the United States 2001-2023. 分解2001-2023年美国自杀率的变化。
IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-09-04 DOI: 10.1017/S2045796025100218
Paul S F Yip, Yu Cheng Hsu, Tsz Mei Lam, Yunyu Xiao, Eric Caine

Introduction: Suicide rates in the United States have been increasing, necessitating an understanding of demographic variations by ethnicity, age, sex and method to inform effective prevention strategies.

Objective: To dissect suicide rates in the US population from 2001 to 2023 by age, sex, ethnicity, and method.

Methods: This retrospective observational study utilized suicide data and population statistics from the CDC's WISQARS database for the years 2001 (n = 30,418), 2018 (n = 48,132), 2020 (n = 45,721) and 2023 (n = 49,014). Cases were stratified by age, sex, ethnicity, and suicide method to assess trends and demographic differences.

Results: From 2001 to 2023, the overall US suicide rate rose from 10.7 to 14.6 per 100,000, with a temporary decrease in 2019 and 2020 (14.4 and 13.8, respectively). The primary driver of the increase was firearm-related suicides among White males, contributing 25.8% of the rise from 2001 to 2018 and 51.6% from 2020 to 2023. Decline between 2018 and 2020 was mainly due to reductions in firearm and drug-related suicides among White males, but firearm suicides surged again from 2020 to 2023. Additionally, firearm suicides among ethnic minorities, especially Black/African-American males, accounted for 14.0% of the increase during 2020-2023. Drug-related suicides also increased by 8.6% among White females aged 45 and older in the same period.

Conclusions: Firearm suicides are the leading factor in the changing suicide rates in the United States from 2001 to 2023, alongside rising drug-related suicides among White females. These trends highlight the necessity for targeted prevention efforts that consider demographic-specific factors and method accessibility.

导言:美国的自杀率一直在上升,有必要了解种族、年龄、性别和方法的人口变化,以告知有效的预防策略。目的:按年龄、性别、种族和方法分析2001年至2023年美国人口的自杀率。方法:本回顾性观察性研究利用美国疾病控制与预防中心WISQARS数据库2001年(n = 30,418)、2018年(n = 48,132)、2020年(n = 45,721)和2023年(n = 49,014)的自杀数据和人口统计数据。病例按年龄、性别、种族和自杀方法分层,以评估趋势和人口统计学差异。结果:从2001年到2023年,美国整体自杀率从每10万人10.7人上升到14.6人,在2019年和2020年暂时下降(分别为14.4人和13.8人)。这一增长的主要驱动因素是白人男性与枪支有关的自杀,在2001年至2018年的增长中占25.8%,在2020年至2023年的增长中占51.6%。2018年至2020年期间的下降主要是由于白人男性枪支和毒品相关自杀事件的减少,但从2020年到2023年,枪支自杀事件再次激增。此外,在2020-2023年期间,少数民族,特别是黑人/非裔美国男性的枪支自杀占增长量的14.0%。同期,45岁及以上的白人女性中与毒品有关的自杀也增加了8.6%。结论:枪支自杀是2001年至2023年美国自杀率变化的主要因素,同时白人女性中与毒品有关的自杀也在上升。这些趋势突出表明,必须开展有针对性的预防工作,考虑到人口特定因素和方法可及性。
{"title":"Decomposing the change of suicide rates in the United States 2001-2023.","authors":"Paul S F Yip, Yu Cheng Hsu, Tsz Mei Lam, Yunyu Xiao, Eric Caine","doi":"10.1017/S2045796025100218","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S2045796025100218","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Suicide rates in the United States have been increasing, necessitating an understanding of demographic variations by ethnicity, age, sex and method to inform effective prevention strategies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To dissect suicide rates in the US population from 2001 to 2023 by age, sex, ethnicity, and method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study utilized suicide data and population statistics from the CDC's WISQARS database for the years 2001 (<i>n</i> = 30,418), 2018 (<i>n</i> = 48,132), 2020 (<i>n</i> = 45,721) and 2023 (<i>n</i> = 49,014). Cases were stratified by age, sex, ethnicity, and suicide method to assess trends and demographic differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2001 to 2023, the overall US suicide rate rose from 10.7 to 14.6 per 100,000, with a temporary decrease in 2019 and 2020 (14.4 and 13.8, respectively). The primary driver of the increase was firearm-related suicides among White males, contributing 25.8% of the rise from 2001 to 2018 and 51.6% from 2020 to 2023. Decline between 2018 and 2020 was mainly due to reductions in firearm and drug-related suicides among White males, but firearm suicides surged again from 2020 to 2023. Additionally, firearm suicides among ethnic minorities, especially Black/African-American males, accounted for 14.0% of the increase during 2020-2023. Drug-related suicides also increased by 8.6% among White females aged 45 and older in the same period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Firearm suicides are the leading factor in the changing suicide rates in the United States from 2001 to 2023, alongside rising drug-related suicides among White females. These trends highlight the necessity for targeted prevention efforts that consider demographic-specific factors and method accessibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":11787,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","volume":"34 ","pages":"e46"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12450541/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144991742","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The impact of socioeconomic factors on the incidence and characteristics of first-episode psychosis. 社会经济因素对首发精神病发病率和特征的影响。
IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-09-02 DOI: 10.1017/S2045796025100206
Martino Belvederi Murri, Alice Onofrio, Chiara Punzi, Nicola Caranci, Enrico Rubolino, Francesco Giovinazzi, Danila Azzolina, Federica Folesani, Luigi Grassi, Ilaria Tarricone, Fabrizio Starace

Aim: The environment shapes the risk of psychosis. In particular, urbanicity, deprivation or inequality, migrant density and cannabis availability may not only influence psychosis incidence, but also the characteristics of individuals who arrive at clinical services. This study examined how socioeconomic factors influence the incidence and characteristics of cases of First-Episode Psychosis (FEP).

Methods: We analysed prospective data collected from the FEP early detection programme of Emilia-Romagna, a high-income Italian region. Participants were 1240 individuals aged 18-35 years, who presented at the public healthcare services for a FEP. Exposures were derived from area-level data of 331 municipalities. We used population density, socioeconomic deprivation, educational deprivation, economic inequality, migrant density (proportion of migrants), frequent cannabis use (proportion of people aged 15-19 years old who reported frequent cannabis use). Outcome measures were FEP incidence (cases/100 000 inhabitants at risk per year) and characteristics (age of onset, migrant status, unemployment, substance use, treatment lag [DUP], family and resource problems). We reviewed pertinent literature, and formulated a Directed Acyclic Graph to present causal assumptions and provide adjustment sets for Bayesian spatial and multilevel models of social causation. To compare the effects of different exposures, we computed Average Marginal Effects and report the outcome changes that correspond to one standard deviation change of the exposure, incidence rate ratios (IRR) or odds ratios (OR).

Results: The exposures and incidence of FEP displayed heterogeneous spatial distribution, with no spatially organized pattern. Accordingly, incidence and characteristics were best modelled as non-spatial, three-level hierarchical models. The incidence of FEP was influenced by population density (IRR, 1.14; 95% CrI, 1.03; 1.29), educational deprivation (IRR, 1.15; 95% CrI, 1.02; 1.31) and frequent cannabis use (IRR, 1.31; 95% CrI, 0.98; 1.82), more than socioeconomic deprivation. Higher migrant density in an area shortened the DUP on average by 3.4 months (95% CrI, -1.122; 0.76), while an increase of cannabis use of one standard deviation increased the DUP of 12.9 months (95% CrI, -2.86; 6229). Socioeconomic deprivation increased the likelihood of FEP cases being substance users (OR, 1.12; 95% CrI, 1.01; 1.26), while population density decreased it (OR, 0.91; 95% CrI, 0.83; 1.00).

Conclusions: Area-level socioeconomic features affect both the incidence and the characteristics of FEP, including the probability of individual being migrants, substance users or having a different DUP. Educational deprivation may function as a proxy for culture- or cognitive-related factors. Area-level socioeconomic data may inform public healthcare strategies for early identification and availability of tertiary

目的:环境塑造精神病的风险。特别是,城市化、贫困或不平等、移徙人口密度和大麻供应不仅可能影响精神病发病率,而且还可能影响到获得临床服务的个人的特征。本研究探讨了社会经济因素如何影响首发精神病(FEP)的发生率和特征。方法:我们分析了意大利高收入地区艾米利亚-罗马涅地区FEP早期检测项目收集的前瞻性数据。参与者是1240名年龄在18-35岁之间的人,他们在公共医疗保健服务机构接受了FEP。暴露量来源于331个城市的地区级数据。我们使用了人口密度、社会经济剥夺、教育剥夺、经济不平等、移民密度(移民比例)、频繁使用大麻(15-19岁经常使用大麻的人的比例)。结局指标是FEP发病率(每年每10万有风险居民的病例数)和特征(发病年龄、移民身份、失业、药物使用、治疗滞后(DUP)、家庭和资源问题)。我们回顾了相关文献,并制定了一个有向无环图来呈现因果假设,并为贝叶斯空间和多层次社会因果模型提供调整集。为了比较不同暴露的影响,我们计算了平均边际效应,并报告了暴露、发病率比(IRR)或优势比(or)的一个标准差变化所对应的结果变化。结果:FEP暴露量和发生率在空间上呈非均匀分布,无空间组织规律。因此,发病率和特征最好采用非空间的三层分层模型。人口密度(IRR, 1.14; 95% CrI, 1.03; 1.29)、教育剥夺(IRR, 1.15; 95% CrI, 1.02; 1.31)和频繁使用大麻(IRR, 1.31; 95% CrI, 0.98; 1.82)对FEP发病率的影响大于社会经济剥夺。移民密度越高,DUP平均缩短3.4个月(95% CrI, -1.122; 0.76),大麻使用量每增加一个标准差,DUP平均增加12.9个月(95% CrI, -2.86; 6229)。社会经济剥夺增加了FEP病例为物质使用者的可能性(OR, 1.12; 95% CrI, 1.01; 1.26),而人口密度降低了FEP病例为物质使用者的可能性(OR, 0.91; 95% CrI, 0.83; 1.00)。结论:区域层面的社会经济特征影响FEP的发生率和特征,包括个体是移民、物质使用者或具有不同DUP的概率。教育剥夺可能是文化或认知相关因素的代表。地区一级的社会经济数据可以为公共卫生保健战略提供信息,以便及早发现和提供三级临床服务。
{"title":"The impact of socioeconomic factors on the incidence and characteristics of first-episode psychosis.","authors":"Martino Belvederi Murri, Alice Onofrio, Chiara Punzi, Nicola Caranci, Enrico Rubolino, Francesco Giovinazzi, Danila Azzolina, Federica Folesani, Luigi Grassi, Ilaria Tarricone, Fabrizio Starace","doi":"10.1017/S2045796025100206","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S2045796025100206","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The environment shapes the risk of psychosis. In particular, urbanicity, deprivation or inequality, migrant density and cannabis availability may not only influence psychosis incidence, but also the characteristics of individuals who arrive at clinical services. This study examined how socioeconomic factors influence the incidence and characteristics of cases of First-Episode Psychosis (FEP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed prospective data collected from the FEP early detection programme of Emilia-Romagna, a high-income Italian region. Participants were 1240 individuals aged 18-35 years, who presented at the public healthcare services for a FEP. Exposures were derived from area-level data of 331 municipalities. We used population density, socioeconomic deprivation, educational deprivation, economic inequality, migrant density (proportion of migrants), frequent cannabis use (proportion of people aged 15-19 years old who reported frequent cannabis use). Outcome measures were FEP incidence (cases/100 000 inhabitants at risk per year) and characteristics (age of onset, migrant status, unemployment, substance use, treatment lag [DUP], family and resource problems). We reviewed pertinent literature, and formulated a Directed Acyclic Graph to present causal assumptions and provide adjustment sets for Bayesian spatial and multilevel models of social causation. To compare the effects of different exposures, we computed Average Marginal Effects and report the outcome changes that correspond to one standard deviation change of the exposure, incidence rate ratios (IRR) or odds ratios (OR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The exposures and incidence of FEP displayed heterogeneous spatial distribution, with no spatially organized pattern. Accordingly, incidence and characteristics were best modelled as non-spatial, three-level hierarchical models. The incidence of FEP was influenced by population density (IRR, 1.14; 95% CrI, 1.03; 1.29), educational deprivation (IRR, 1.15; 95% CrI, 1.02; 1.31) and frequent cannabis use (IRR, 1.31; 95% CrI, 0.98; 1.82), more than socioeconomic deprivation. Higher migrant density in an area shortened the DUP on average by 3.4 months (95% CrI, -1.122; 0.76), while an increase of cannabis use of one standard deviation increased the DUP of 12.9 months (95% CrI, -2.86; 6229). Socioeconomic deprivation increased the likelihood of FEP cases being substance users (OR, 1.12; 95% CrI, 1.01; 1.26), while population density decreased it (OR, 0.91; 95% CrI, 0.83; 1.00).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Area-level socioeconomic features affect both the incidence and the characteristics of FEP, including the probability of individual being migrants, substance users or having a different DUP. Educational deprivation may function as a proxy for culture- or cognitive-related factors. Area-level socioeconomic data may inform public healthcare strategies for early identification and availability of tertiary","PeriodicalId":11787,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","volume":"34 ","pages":"e45"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12450539/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144946501","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The prevalence of traumatic experiences and PTSD according to DSM-5 and ICD-11 in the German general population. 根据DSM-5和ICD-11,德国普通人群中创伤经历和PTSD的患病率。
IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-08-27 DOI: 10.1017/S2045796025100164
Amelie Pettrich, Yuriy Nesterko, Heide Glaesmer

Aims: The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - 5th Edition (DSM-5) and International Classification of Diseases - 11th Revision (ICD-11) employ different post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) criteria, necessitating updated prevalence estimates. Most of the existing evidence is still based on ICD-Tenth Revision and DSM-Fourth Edition criteria, leading to varied estimates across populations. This study provides current PTSD prevalence rates in the German general population, comparing DSM-5 and ICD-11 criteria and examines variations by age and gender.

Methods: In a 2016 cross-sectional survey of 2404 adults (18-94 years) representative of the German general population, participants completed the Life-Events-Checklist for DSM-5 (LEC-5) for trauma exposure and the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) for PTSD symptoms. Probable PTSD diagnoses were based on DSM-5-, ICD-11-algorithms and suggested cut-off scores. Chi-square and McNemar's tests were used to test differences in prevalence rates by diagnostic framework, age and gender.

Results: Of the total sample, 47.2% (n = 1135) reported experiencing at least one lifetime traumatic event (TE), with transportation accidents (7.3%) and life-threatening injuries (4.9%) being most common. Probable PTSD prevalence was 4.7% under both DSM-5 and ICD-11 criteria, and 2.6% based on a conservative cut-off normed for prevalence estimation. Gender and age were not significantly associated with TE exposure or PTSD prevalence, though trauma types varied: female participants more often reported sexual violence and severe suffering, while more male participants reported physical assaults and various types of accidents. DSM-5 and ICD-11 diagnostic algorithms had substantial yet not perfect agreement (κ = 0.62). Particularly within the re-experiencing symptoms, cluster agreement was only moderate (κ = 0.57). The cut-off method aligned more closely with DSM-5 (κ = 0.60) than ICD-11 algorithm (κ = 0.42).

Conclusions: This study provides updated PTSD prevalence estimates for the German general population and underscores differences between DSM-5 and ICD-11 in identifying cases, particularly with respect to re-experiencing symptoms. These findings emphasize that while overall PTSD prevalence rates under DSM-5 and ICD-11 criteria are similar, the diagnostic frameworks identify partially distinct cases, reflecting differences in symptom definitions. This highlights the need to carefully consider the impact of evolving diagnostic criteria when interpreting prevalence estimates and comparing results across studies.

目的:精神障碍诊断与统计手册-第5版(DSM-5)和国际疾病分类-第11修订版(ICD-11)采用不同的创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)标准,有必要更新患病率估计。大多数现有证据仍然基于icd第十版和dsm第四版标准,导致不同人群的估计不同。本研究提供了目前德国普通人群中PTSD的患病率,比较了DSM-5和ICD-11的标准,并检查了年龄和性别的差异。方法:在2016年对2404名代表德国普通人群的成年人(18-94岁)进行横断面调查,参与者完成了DSM-5 (LEC-5)创伤暴露生活事件检查表和DSM-5 (PCL-5) PTSD症状检查表。可能的PTSD诊断基于DSM-5-, icd -11算法和建议的截止分数。使用卡方检验和McNemar检验来检验诊断框架、年龄和性别的患病率差异。结果:在总样本中,47.2% (n = 1135)报告至少经历过一次终身创伤性事件(TE),其中交通事故(7.3%)和危及生命的伤害(4.9%)最为常见。根据DSM-5和ICD-11标准,PTSD的可能患病率为4.7%,根据保守的患病率估计标准,可能患病率为2.6%。性别和年龄与创伤暴露或创伤后应激障碍患病率没有显著关系,尽管创伤类型各不相同:女性参与者更多地报告性暴力和严重痛苦,而更多的男性参与者报告身体攻击和各种类型的事故。DSM-5和ICD-11的诊断算法有大量但不完全的一致性(κ = 0.62)。特别是在再经历症状中,聚类一致性仅为中等(κ = 0.57)。与ICD-11算法(κ = 0.42)相比,截断法与DSM-5 (κ = 0.60)更接近。结论:这项研究为德国普通人群提供了最新的PTSD患病率估计,并强调了DSM-5和ICD-11在识别病例方面的差异,特别是在再次经历症状方面。这些发现强调,虽然DSM-5和ICD-11标准下的PTSD总体患病率相似,但诊断框架识别出部分不同的病例,反映了症状定义的差异。这突出表明,在解释患病率估计值和比较研究结果时,需要仔细考虑不断发展的诊断标准的影响。
{"title":"The prevalence of traumatic experiences and PTSD according to DSM-5 and ICD-11 in the German general population.","authors":"Amelie Pettrich, Yuriy Nesterko, Heide Glaesmer","doi":"10.1017/S2045796025100164","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S2045796025100164","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - 5th Edition (DSM-5) and International Classification of Diseases - 11th Revision (ICD-11) employ different post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) criteria, necessitating updated prevalence estimates. Most of the existing evidence is still based on ICD-Tenth Revision and DSM-Fourth Edition criteria, leading to varied estimates across populations. This study provides current PTSD prevalence rates in the German general population, comparing DSM-5 and ICD-11 criteria and examines variations by age and gender.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a 2016 cross-sectional survey of 2404 adults (18-94 years) representative of the German general population, participants completed the Life-Events-Checklist for DSM-5 (LEC-5) for trauma exposure and the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) for PTSD symptoms. Probable PTSD diagnoses were based on DSM-5-, ICD-11-algorithms and suggested cut-off scores. Chi-square and McNemar's tests were used to test differences in prevalence rates by diagnostic framework, age and gender.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the total sample, 47.2% (<i>n</i> = 1135) reported experiencing at least one lifetime traumatic event (TE), with transportation accidents (7.3%) and life-threatening injuries (4.9%) being most common. Probable PTSD prevalence was 4.7% under both DSM-5 and ICD-11 criteria, and 2.6% based on a conservative cut-off normed for prevalence estimation. Gender and age were not significantly associated with TE exposure or PTSD prevalence, though trauma types varied: female participants more often reported sexual violence and severe suffering, while more male participants reported physical assaults and various types of accidents. DSM-5 and ICD-11 diagnostic algorithms had substantial yet not perfect agreement (<i>κ</i> = 0.62). Particularly within the re-experiencing symptoms, cluster agreement was only moderate (<i>κ</i> = 0.57). The cut-off method aligned more closely with DSM-5 (<i>κ</i> = 0.60) than ICD-11 algorithm (<i>κ</i> = 0.42).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides updated PTSD prevalence estimates for the German general population and underscores differences between DSM-5 and ICD-11 in identifying cases, particularly with respect to re-experiencing symptoms. These findings emphasize that while overall PTSD prevalence rates under DSM-5 and ICD-11 criteria are similar, the diagnostic frameworks identify partially distinct cases, reflecting differences in symptom definitions. This highlights the need to carefully consider the impact of evolving diagnostic criteria when interpreting prevalence estimates and comparing results across studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":11787,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","volume":"34 ","pages":"e44"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12450535/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144947265","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Combined social determinants of health contributed to adverse health outcomes among depression: evidence from two national cohorts. 健康的综合社会决定因素导致抑郁症的不良健康结果:来自两个国家队列的证据。
IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-08-22 DOI: 10.1017/S2045796025100176
Xin Qi, Li Liu, Jin Yang, Chuyu Pan, Jingcan Hao, Wenming Wei, Shiqiang Cheng, Yifan Gou, Boyue Zhao, Yan Wen, Bolun Cheng, Feng Zhang

Aims: Social determinants of health (SDHs) exert a significant influence on various health outcomes and disparities. This study aimed to explore the associations between combined SDHs and mortality, as well as adverse health outcomes among adults with depression.

Methods: The research included 48,897 participants with depression from the UK Biobank and 7,771 from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). By calculating combined SDH scores based on 14 SDHs in the UK Biobank and 9 in the US NHANES, participants were categorized into favourable, medium and unfavourable SDH groups through tertiles. Cox regression models were used to evaluate the impact of combined SDHs on mortality (all-cause, cardiovascular disease [CVD] and cancer) in both cohorts, as well as incidences of CVD, cancer and dementia in the UK Biobank.

Results: In the fully adjusted models, compared to the favourable SDH group, the hazard ratios for all-cause mortality were 1.81 (95% CI: 1.60-2.04) in the unfavourable SDH group in the UK Biobank cohort; 1.61 (95% CI: 1.31-1.98) in the medium SDH group and 2.19 (95% CI: 1.78-2.68) in the unfavourable SDH group in the US NHANES cohort. Moreover, higher levels of unfavourable SDHs were associated with increased mortality risk from CVD and cancer. Regarding disease incidence, they were significantly linked to higher incidences of CVD and dementia but not cancer in the UK Biobank.

Conclusions: Combined unfavourable SDHs were associated with elevated risks of mortality and adverse health outcomes among adults with depression, which suggested that assessing the combined impact of SDHs could serve as a key strategy in preventing and managing depression, ultimately helping to reduce the burden of disease.

目的:健康的社会决定因素(SDHs)对各种健康结果和差距产生重大影响。本研究旨在探讨合并sdh与成人抑郁症患者死亡率以及不良健康结局之间的关系。方法:该研究包括来自英国生物银行的48897名抑郁症患者和来自美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)的7771名抑郁症患者。通过计算基于英国生物银行中14个SDH和美国NHANES中9个SDH的综合SDH评分,参与者通过分位数被分为有利、中等和不利的SDH组。使用Cox回归模型评估联合sdh对两个队列中死亡率(全因、心血管疾病[CVD]和癌症)的影响,以及UK Biobank中CVD、癌症和痴呆的发病率。结果:在完全调整的模型中,与有利SDH组相比,在英国生物银行队列中,不利SDH组的全因死亡率风险比为1.81 (95% CI: 1.60-2.04);在美国NHANES队列中,中度SDH组为1.61 (95% CI: 1.31-1.98),不良SDH组为2.19 (95% CI: 1.78-2.68)。此外,不利的sdh水平较高与心血管疾病和癌症死亡风险增加有关。在疾病发病率方面,在英国生物银行中,它们与心血管疾病和痴呆的高发病率显著相关,但与癌症无关。结论:综合不利的sdh与成人抑郁症患者死亡风险升高和不良健康结果相关,这表明评估sdh的综合影响可以作为预防和管理抑郁症的关键策略,最终有助于减轻疾病负担。
{"title":"Combined social determinants of health contributed to adverse health outcomes among depression: evidence from two national cohorts.","authors":"Xin Qi, Li Liu, Jin Yang, Chuyu Pan, Jingcan Hao, Wenming Wei, Shiqiang Cheng, Yifan Gou, Boyue Zhao, Yan Wen, Bolun Cheng, Feng Zhang","doi":"10.1017/S2045796025100176","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S2045796025100176","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Social determinants of health (SDHs) exert a significant influence on various health outcomes and disparities. This study aimed to explore the associations between combined SDHs and mortality, as well as adverse health outcomes among adults with depression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The research included 48,897 participants with depression from the UK Biobank and 7,771 from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). By calculating combined SDH scores based on 14 SDHs in the UK Biobank and 9 in the US NHANES, participants were categorized into favourable, medium and unfavourable SDH groups through tertiles. Cox regression models were used to evaluate the impact of combined SDHs on mortality (all-cause, cardiovascular disease [CVD] and cancer) in both cohorts, as well as incidences of CVD, cancer and dementia in the UK Biobank.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the fully adjusted models, compared to the favourable SDH group, the hazard ratios for all-cause mortality were 1.81 (95% CI: 1.60-2.04) in the unfavourable SDH group in the UK Biobank cohort; 1.61 (95% CI: 1.31-1.98) in the medium SDH group and 2.19 (95% CI: 1.78-2.68) in the unfavourable SDH group in the US NHANES cohort. Moreover, higher levels of unfavourable SDHs were associated with increased mortality risk from CVD and cancer. Regarding disease incidence, they were significantly linked to higher incidences of CVD and dementia but not cancer in the UK Biobank.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combined unfavourable SDHs were associated with elevated risks of mortality and adverse health outcomes among adults with depression, which suggested that assessing the combined impact of SDHs could serve as a key strategy in preventing and managing depression, ultimately helping to reduce the burden of disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":11787,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","volume":"34 ","pages":"e43"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12450540/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144946559","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1