首页 > 最新文献

Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences最新文献

英文 中文
Mental health and help-seeking in Czech sexual minorities: a nationally representative cross-sectional study. 捷克性少数群体的心理健康和求助情况:一项具有全国代表性的横断面研究。
IF 8.1 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-03-21 DOI: 10.1017/S2045796024000210
Michal Pitoňák, Libor Potočár, Tomáš Formánek

Aims: The mental health of sexual minority (SM) individuals remains overlooked and understudied in Czechia. We aimed to estimate (1) the prevalence rate and (2) the relative risk of common mental disorders and (3) the mental distress severity among the Czech SM people compared with the heterosexual population. In addition, we aimed to investigate help-seeking for mental disorders in SM people.

Methods: We used data from a cross-sectional, nationally representative survey of Czech community-dwelling adults, consisting of 3063 respondents (response rate = 58.62%). We used the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview to assess the presence of mental disorders. In individuals scoring positively, we established help-seeking in the past 12 months. We assessed symptom severity using the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire and the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale. We computed the prevalence of mental disorders and the treatment gap with 95% confidence intervals. To assess the risk of having a mental disorder, we used binary logistic regression.

Results: We demonstrated that the prevalence of current mental disorders was 18.85% (17.43-20.28), 52.27% (36.91-67.63), 33.33% (19.5-47.17) and 25.93% (13.85-38) in heterosexual, gay or lesbian, bisexual and more sexually diverse individuals, respectively. Suicidal thoughts and behaviours were present in 5.73% (4.88-6.57), 25.00% (11.68-38.32), 22.92% (10.58-35.25) and 11.11% (2.45-19.77) of heterosexual, gay or lesbian, bisexual and more sexually diverse individuals, respectively. After confounder adjustment, gay or lesbian individuals were more likely to have at least one current mental disorder compared with heterosexual counterparts (odds ratio = 3.51; 1.83-6.76). For bisexual and sexually more diverse individuals, the results were consistent with a null effect (1.85; 0.96-3.45 and 0.89; 0.42-1.73). The mean depression symptom severity was 2.96 (2.81-3.11) in heterosexual people and 4.68 (2.95-6.42), 7.12 (5.07-9.18) and 5.17 (3.38-6.95) in gay or lesbian, bisexual and more sexually diverse individuals, respectively. The mean anxiety symptom severity was 1.97 (1.85-2.08) in heterosexual people and 3.5 (1.98-5.02), 4.63 (3.05-6.2) and 3.7 (2.29-5.11) in gay or lesbian, bisexual and more sexually diverse individuals, respectively. We demonstrated broadly consistent levels of treatment gap in heterosexual and SM individuals scoring positively for at least one current mental disorder (82.91%; 79.5-85.96 vs. 81.13%; 68.03-90.56).

Conclusions: We provide evidence that SM people in Czechia have substantially worse mental health outcomes than their heterosexual counterparts. Systemic changes are imperative to provide not only better and more sensitive care to SM individuals but also to address structural stigma contributing to these health disparities.

目的:在捷克,性少数群体(SM)个体的心理健康问题仍然被忽视,研究不足。我们的目的是估算 (1) 捷克性少数群体与异性恋人群相比的患病率、(2) 常见精神障碍的相对风险以及 (3) 精神痛苦的严重程度。此外,我们还旨在调查 SM 患者因精神障碍而寻求帮助的情况:我们使用了一项横断面全国代表性调查的数据,调查对象是捷克社区居住的成年人,共有 3063 名受访者(回复率 = 58.62%)。我们使用 "小型国际神经精神病学访谈"(Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview)来评估是否存在精神障碍。对于阳性得分者,我们确定其在过去 12 个月中寻求过帮助。我们使用 9 项患者健康问卷和 7 项广泛性焦虑症量表来评估症状的严重程度。我们计算了精神障碍的患病率和治疗差距,并得出了 95% 的置信区间。为了评估患有精神障碍的风险,我们采用了二元逻辑回归法:结果:我们发现,在异性恋、男同性恋或女同性恋、双性恋和性取向更多样化的人群中,当前精神障碍的患病率分别为 18.85% (17.43-20.28)、52.27% (36.91-67.63)、33.33% (19.5-47.17) 和 25.93% (13.85-38)。有自杀想法和行为的异性恋、男同性恋或女同性恋、双性恋和性取向更多样化者分别占 5.73%(4.88-6.57)、25.00%(11.68-38.32)、22.92%(10.58-35.25)和 11.11%(2.45-19.77)。经混杂因素调整后,与异性恋者相比,男同性恋或女同性恋者更有可能患有至少一种当前精神障碍(几率比=3.51;1.83-6.76)。对于双性恋和性取向更多样化的人来说,结果与无效效应一致(1.85;0.96-3.45 和 0.89;0.42-1.73)。异性恋者的平均抑郁症状严重程度为 2.96(2.81-3.11),而男同性恋或女同性恋、双性恋和性取向更多样化者的平均抑郁症状严重程度分别为 4.68(2.95-6.42)、7.12(5.07-9.18)和 5.17(3.38-6.95)。异性恋者的平均焦虑症状严重程度为 1.97(1.85-2.08),而男同性恋或女同性恋、双性恋和性取向更多样化者的平均焦虑症状严重程度分别为 3.5(1.98-5.02)、4.63(3.05-6.2)和 3.7(2.29-5.11)。我们发现,在异性恋和 SM 患者中,至少有一种当前精神障碍得到肯定评分的治疗差距水平基本一致(82.91%;79.5-85.96 vs. 81.13%;68.03-90.56):我们提供的证据表明,捷克的 SM 患者的精神健康状况远不如异性恋患者。系统性变革势在必行,不仅要为 SM 个人提供更好、更敏感的护理,还要解决造成这些健康差异的结构性污名化问题。
{"title":"Mental health and help-seeking in Czech sexual minorities: a nationally representative cross-sectional study.","authors":"Michal Pitoňák, Libor Potočár, Tomáš Formánek","doi":"10.1017/S2045796024000210","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S2045796024000210","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The mental health of sexual minority (SM) individuals remains overlooked and understudied in Czechia. We aimed to estimate (1) the prevalence rate and (2) the relative risk of common mental disorders and (3) the mental distress severity among the Czech SM people compared with the heterosexual population. In addition, we aimed to investigate help-seeking for mental disorders in SM people.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from a cross-sectional, nationally representative survey of Czech community-dwelling adults, consisting of 3063 respondents (response rate = 58.62%). We used the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview to assess the presence of mental disorders. In individuals scoring positively, we established help-seeking in the past 12 months. We assessed symptom severity using the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire and the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale. We computed the prevalence of mental disorders and the treatment gap with 95% confidence intervals. To assess the risk of having a mental disorder, we used binary logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We demonstrated that the prevalence of current mental disorders was 18.85% (17.43-20.28), 52.27% (36.91-67.63), 33.33% (19.5-47.17) and 25.93% (13.85-38) in heterosexual, gay or lesbian, bisexual and more sexually diverse individuals, respectively. Suicidal thoughts and behaviours were present in 5.73% (4.88-6.57), 25.00% (11.68-38.32), 22.92% (10.58-35.25) and 11.11% (2.45-19.77) of heterosexual, gay or lesbian, bisexual and more sexually diverse individuals, respectively. After confounder adjustment, gay or lesbian individuals were more likely to have at least one current mental disorder compared with heterosexual counterparts (odds ratio = 3.51; 1.83-6.76). For bisexual and sexually more diverse individuals, the results were consistent with a null effect (1.85; 0.96-3.45 and 0.89; 0.42-1.73). The mean depression symptom severity was 2.96 (2.81-3.11) in heterosexual people and 4.68 (2.95-6.42), 7.12 (5.07-9.18) and 5.17 (3.38-6.95) in gay or lesbian, bisexual and more sexually diverse individuals, respectively. The mean anxiety symptom severity was 1.97 (1.85-2.08) in heterosexual people and 3.5 (1.98-5.02), 4.63 (3.05-6.2) and 3.7 (2.29-5.11) in gay or lesbian, bisexual and more sexually diverse individuals, respectively. We demonstrated broadly consistent levels of treatment gap in heterosexual and SM individuals scoring positively for at least one current mental disorder (82.91%; 79.5-85.96 vs. 81.13%; 68.03-90.56).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We provide evidence that SM people in Czechia have substantially worse mental health outcomes than their heterosexual counterparts. Systemic changes are imperative to provide not only better and more sensitive care to SM individuals but also to address structural stigma contributing to these health disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":11787,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11022263/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140179428","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The prevalence of intimate partner violence and risk factors for women and men in China during the Shanghai 2022 lockdown 2022 年上海封锁期间中国女性和男性亲密伴侣暴力的发生率和风险因素
IF 8.1 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-03-20 DOI: 10.1017/s2045796024000155
Liying Yang, Amy Shaw, Thomas J. Nyman, Brian J. Hall
Aims

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a global public health concern with negative effects on individuals and families. The present study investigated the prevalence, risk factors and gender disparities associated with IPV during the Shanghai 2022 Covid-19 lockdown – a public health emergency which may have exacerbated IPV.

Methods

We estimated the total IPV prevalence and prevalence of physical, sexual and verbal IPV by using an adapted version of the Extended-Hurt, Insult, Threaten, Scream scale. This cross-sectional study was carried out using a population quota-based sampling of Shanghai residents across 16 districts during the 2022 Shanghai lockdown (N = 2026; 1058 men and 968 women).

Results

We found a distinct gendered dynamic, where women reported a significantly higher prevalence of experienced IPV (27.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 23.1–31.4) compared to men (19.8%, 95% CI: 16.1–24.0). Notably, the prevalence estimate mirrored the national lifetime IPV prevalence for women but was over twice as high for men. In multivariable logistic regression analyses, economic stress (income loss: adjusted OR [aOR] = 2.42, 95% CI: 1.28–4.56; job loss: aOR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.02–2.92; financial worry much more than usual: aOR = 1.89, 95% CI: 1.00–3.57) and household burden (one child at home: aOR = 1.81, 95% CI: 1.12–2.92; not enough food: aOR = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.04–2.70) were associated with increased odds of overall IPV victimization among women but not men. With regard to more serious forms of IPV, job loss (aOR = 2.27, 95% CI: 1.09–4.69) and household burden (two or more children at home: aOR = 2.95, 95% CI: 1.33–7.69) were associated with increased odds of physical IPV against men. For women, a lack of household supplies was associated with increased odds of physical IPV (water: aOR = 3.33, 95% CI: 1.79–6.25; daily supplies: aOR = 2.27, 95% CI: 1.18–4.35). Lack of daily supplies (aOR = 2.17, 95% CI: 1.03–4.55) and job loss (aOR = 2.66, 95% CI: 1.16–6.12) were also associated with increased odds of sexual IPV.

Conclusions

Although a larger proportion of women reported IPV, men experienced greater IPV during the lockdown than previously estimated before the pandemic. Economic stressors, including job loss, and household burden were critical risk factors for serious forms of IPV. Improving gender equality that my account for disparities in IPV in China is critically needed. Policies that mitigate the impact of economic losses during crises can potentially reduce IPV.

目的亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)是一个全球性的公共卫生问题,对个人和家庭都有负面影响。本研究调查了在 2022 年上海 "Covid-19 "封锁期间与 IPV 相关的流行率、风险因素和性别差异--这一公共卫生突发事件可能加剧了 IPV。方法我们使用改编版的 "伤害、侮辱、威胁、尖叫 "量表估算了 IPV 的总流行率以及身体、性和语言 IPV 的流行率。这项横断面研究在 2022 年上海封锁期间对 16 个区的上海居民进行了基于人口配额的抽样调查(N = 2026;男性 1058 人,女性 968 人)。结果我们发现了一个明显的性别动态变化,与男性(19.8%,95% 置信区间 [CI]:16.1-24.0)相比,女性报告的 IPV 发生率明显更高(27.1%,95% 置信区间 [CI]:23.1-31.4)。值得注意的是,该流行率估计值反映了全国女性终生遭受 IPV 的流行率,但男性的流行率是女性的两倍多。在多变量逻辑回归分析中,经济压力(收入损失:调整 OR [aOR] = 2.42,95% CI:1.28-4.56;工作损失:aOR = 1.73,95% CI:1.02-2.92;财务担忧比平时多得多:aOR = 1.89,95% CI:1.00-3.57)和家庭负担(家中有一个孩子:aOR = 1.81,95% CI:1.12-2.92;食物不足:aOR = 1.67,95% CI:1.04-2.70)与女性遭受 IPV 的总体几率增加有关,但与男性无关。就更严重的 IPV 形式而言,失业(aOR = 2.27,95% CI:1.09-4.69)和家庭负担(家中有两个或两个以上孩子:aOR = 2.95,95% CI:1.33-7.69)与男性遭受身体 IPV 的几率增加有关。对于女性而言,缺乏家庭用品与发生身体 IPV 的几率增加有关(水:aOR = 3.33,95% CI:1.79-6.25;日常用品:aOR = 2.27,95% CI:1.18-4.35)。缺乏日常用品(aOR = 2.17,95% CI:1.03-4.55)和失业(aOR = 2.66,95% CI:1.16-6.12)也与发生 IPV 性暴力行为的几率增加有关。经济压力(包括失业)和家庭负担是导致严重形式的 IPV 的关键风险因素。中国亟需改善性别平等,以解释 IPV 的差异。减轻危机期间经济损失影响的政策有可能减少 IPV。
{"title":"The prevalence of intimate partner violence and risk factors for women and men in China during the Shanghai 2022 lockdown","authors":"Liying Yang, Amy Shaw, Thomas J. Nyman, Brian J. Hall","doi":"10.1017/s2045796024000155","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s2045796024000155","url":null,"abstract":"<span>Aims</span><p>Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a global public health concern with negative effects on individuals and families. The present study investigated the prevalence, risk factors and gender disparities associated with IPV during the Shanghai 2022 Covid-19 lockdown – a public health emergency which may have exacerbated IPV.</p><span>Methods</span><p>We estimated the total IPV prevalence and prevalence of physical, sexual and verbal IPV by using an adapted version of the Extended-Hurt, Insult, Threaten, Scream scale. This cross-sectional study was carried out using a population quota-based sampling of Shanghai residents across 16 districts during the 2022 Shanghai lockdown (<span>N</span> = 2026; 1058 men and 968 women).</p><span>Results</span><p>We found a distinct gendered dynamic, where women reported a significantly higher prevalence of experienced IPV (27.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 23.1–31.4) compared to men (19.8%, 95% CI: 16.1–24.0). Notably, the prevalence estimate mirrored the national lifetime IPV prevalence for women but was over twice as high for men. In multivariable logistic regression analyses, economic stress (income loss: adjusted OR [aOR] = 2.42, 95% CI: 1.28–4.56; job loss: aOR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.02–2.92; financial worry much more than usual: aOR = 1.89, 95% CI: 1.00–3.57) and household burden (one child at home: aOR = 1.81, 95% CI: 1.12–2.92; not enough food: aOR = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.04–2.70) were associated with increased odds of overall IPV victimization among women but not men. With regard to more serious forms of IPV, job loss (aOR = 2.27, 95% CI: 1.09–4.69) and household burden (two or more children at home: aOR = 2.95, 95% CI: 1.33–7.69) were associated with increased odds of physical IPV against men. For women, a lack of household supplies was associated with increased odds of physical IPV (water: aOR = 3.33, 95% CI: 1.79–6.25; daily supplies: aOR = 2.27, 95% CI: 1.18–4.35). Lack of daily supplies (aOR = 2.17, 95% CI: 1.03–4.55) and job loss (aOR = 2.66, 95% CI: 1.16–6.12) were also associated with increased odds of sexual IPV.</p><span>Conclusions</span><p>Although a larger proportion of women reported IPV, men experienced greater IPV during the lockdown than previously estimated before the pandemic. Economic stressors, including job loss, and household burden were critical risk factors for serious forms of IPV. Improving gender equality that my account for disparities in IPV in China is critically needed. Policies that mitigate the impact of economic losses during crises can potentially reduce IPV.</p>","PeriodicalId":11787,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140168690","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Greater need but reduced access: a population study of planned and elective surgery rates in adult mental health service users. 需求增大但机会减少:一项关于成人精神健康服务使用者的计划手术和择期手术率的人口研究。
IF 8.1 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-03-18 DOI: 10.1017/S2045796024000131
G Sara, J Hamer, P Gould, J Curtis, P Ramanuj, T A O'Brien, P Burgess

Aims: Timely access to surgery is an essential part of healthcare. People living with mental health (MH) conditions may have higher rates of chronic illness requiring surgical care but also face barriers to care. There is limited evidence about whether unequal surgical access contributes to health inequalities in this group.

Methods: We examined 1.22 million surgical procedures in public and private hospitals in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, in 2019. In a cross-sectional study of 76,320 MH service users aged 18 and over, surgical procedure rates per 1,000 population were compared to rates for 6.23 million other NSW residents after direct standardisation for age, sex and socio-economic disadvantage. Rates were calculated for planned and emergency surgery, for major specialty groups, for the top 10 procedure blocks in each specialty group and for 13 access-sensitive procedures. Subgroup analyses were conducted for hospital and insurance type and for people with severe or persistent MH conditions.

Results: MH service users had higher rates of surgical procedures (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR]: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.51-1.56), due to slightly higher planned procedure rates (aIRR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.19-1.24) and substantially higher emergency procedure rates (aIRR: 3.60, 95% CI: 3.51-3.70). Emergency procedure rates were increased in all block groups with sufficient numbers for standardisation. MH service users had very high rates (aIRR > 4.5) of emergency cardiovascular, skin and plastics and respiratory procedures, higher rates of planned coronary artery bypass grafting, coronary angiography and cholecystectomy but lower rates of planned ophthalmic surgery, cataract repair, shoulder reconstruction, knee replacement and some plastic surgery procedures.

Conclusions: Higher rates of surgery in MH service users may reflect a higher prevalence of conditions requiring surgical care, including cardiac, metabolic, alcohol-related or smoking-related conditions. The striking increase in emergency surgery rates suggests that this need may not be being met, particularly for chronic and disabling conditions which are often treated by planned surgery in private hospital settings in the Australian health system. A higher proportion of emergency surgery may have serious personal and health system consequences.

目的:及时接受外科手术是医疗保健的重要组成部分。患有心理健康(MH)疾病的人可能患有需要外科治疗的慢性疾病的比例较高,但他们也面临着获得治疗的障碍。关于不平等的手术机会是否会导致这一群体的健康不平等,目前的证据还很有限:我们研究了 2019 年澳大利亚新南威尔士州(NSW)公立和私立医院的 122 万例外科手术。在对 76320 名 18 岁及以上的医疗卫生服务使用者进行的横断面研究中,在对年龄、性别和社会经济劣势进行直接标准化后,将每千人的手术率与 623 万其他新南威尔士州居民的手术率进行了比较。计算了计划手术和急诊手术、主要专科组、每个专科组的前 10 个手术区以及 13 个对就诊敏感的手术的比率。对医院和保险类型以及患有严重或持续性精神疾病的人群进行了分组分析:MH服务使用者的手术率较高(调整后发病率比[aIRR]:1.53,95% CI:1.51-1.56),原因是计划手术率略高(aIRR:1.22,95% CI:1.19-1.24),而急诊手术率大幅提高(aIRR:3.60,95% CI:3.51-3.70)。在有足够人数进行标准化的所有区组,急诊手术率都有所上升。医疗卫生服务使用者的心血管、皮肤和整形以及呼吸系统急诊手术率非常高(aIRR > 4.5),计划中的冠状动脉旁路移植术、冠状动脉造影术和胆囊切除术的手术率较高,但计划中的眼科手术、白内障修复、肩部重建、膝关节置换和一些整形手术的手术率较低:结论:精神健康服务使用者的手术率较高,这可能反映了需要外科治疗的疾病的发病率较高,包括心脏病、代谢性疾病、酒精相关疾病或吸烟相关疾病。急诊手术率的显著上升表明,这种需求可能没有得到满足,尤其是慢性病和致残性疾病,在澳大利亚医疗系统中,这些疾病通常是通过私立医院的计划手术来治疗的。较高比例的急诊手术可能会对个人和医疗系统造成严重后果。
{"title":"Greater need but reduced access: a population study of planned and elective surgery rates in adult mental health service users.","authors":"G Sara, J Hamer, P Gould, J Curtis, P Ramanuj, T A O'Brien, P Burgess","doi":"10.1017/S2045796024000131","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S2045796024000131","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Timely access to surgery is an essential part of healthcare. People living with mental health (MH) conditions may have higher rates of chronic illness requiring surgical care but also face barriers to care. There is limited evidence about whether unequal surgical access contributes to health inequalities in this group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined 1.22 million surgical procedures in public and private hospitals in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, in 2019. In a cross-sectional study of 76,320 MH service users aged 18 and over, surgical procedure rates per 1,000 population were compared to rates for 6.23 million other NSW residents after direct standardisation for age, sex and socio-economic disadvantage. Rates were calculated for planned and emergency surgery, for major specialty groups, for the top 10 procedure blocks in each specialty group and for 13 access-sensitive procedures. Subgroup analyses were conducted for hospital and insurance type and for people with severe or persistent MH conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MH service users had higher rates of surgical procedures (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR]: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.51-1.56), due to slightly higher planned procedure rates (aIRR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.19-1.24) and substantially higher emergency procedure rates (aIRR: 3.60, 95% CI: 3.51-3.70). Emergency procedure rates were increased in all block groups with sufficient numbers for standardisation. MH service users had very high rates (aIRR > 4.5) of emergency cardiovascular, skin and plastics and respiratory procedures, higher rates of planned coronary artery bypass grafting, coronary angiography and cholecystectomy but lower rates of planned ophthalmic surgery, cataract repair, shoulder reconstruction, knee replacement and some plastic surgery procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Higher rates of surgery in MH service users may reflect a higher prevalence of conditions requiring surgical care, including cardiac, metabolic, alcohol-related or smoking-related conditions. The striking increase in emergency surgery rates suggests that this need may not be being met, particularly for chronic and disabling conditions which are often treated by planned surgery in private hospital settings in the Australian health system. A higher proportion of emergency surgery may have serious personal and health system consequences.</p>","PeriodicalId":11787,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10951789/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140143037","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Associations between psychosocial work environment factors and first-time and recurrent treatment for depression: a prospective cohort study of 24,226 employees. 社会心理工作环境因素与抑郁症首次和复发治疗之间的关系:一项针对 24,226 名员工的前瞻性队列研究。
IF 8.1 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-03-18 DOI: 10.1017/S2045796024000167
J Mathisen, T-L Nguyen, I E H Madsen, T Xu, J H Jensen, J K Sørensen, R Rugulies, N H Rod

Aims: Adverse factors in the psychosocial work environment are associated with the onset of depression among those without a personal history of depression. However, the evidence is sparse regarding whether adverse work factors can also play a role in depression recurrence. This study aimed to prospectively examine whether factors in the psychosocial work environment are associated with first-time and recurrent treatment for depression.

Methods: The study included 24,226 participants from the Danish Well-being in Hospital Employees study. We measured ten individual psychosocial work factors and three theoretical constructs (effort-reward imbalance, job strain and workplace social capital). We ascertained treatment for depression through registrations of hospital contacts for depression (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems version 10 [ICD-10]: F32 and F33) and redeemed prescriptions of antidepressant medication (Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical [ATC]: N06A) in Danish national registries. We estimated the associations between work factors and treatment for depression for up to 2 years after baseline among those without (first-time treatment) and with (recurrent treatment) a personal history of treatment for depression before baseline. We excluded participants registered with treatment within 6 months before baseline. In supplementary analyses, we extended this washout period to up to 2 years. We applied logistic regression analyses with adjustment for confounding.

Results: Among 21,156 (87%) participants without a history of treatment for depression, 350 (1.7%) had first-time treatment during follow-up. Among the 3070 (13%) participants with treatment history, 353 (11%) had recurrent treatment during follow-up. Those with a history of depression generally reported a more adverse work environment than those without such a history. Baseline exposure to bullying (odds ratio [OR] = 1.72, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.30-2.32), and to some extent also low influence on work schedule (OR = 1.27, 95% CI: 0.97-1.66) and job strain (OR = 1.24, 95% CI: 0.97-1.57), was associated with first-time treatment for depression during follow-up. Baseline exposure to bullying (OR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.04-1.88), lack of collaboration (OR = 1.31, 95% CI: 1.03-1.67) and low job control (OR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.00-1.62) were associated with recurrent treatment for depression during follow-up. However, most work factors were not associated with treatment for depression. Using a 2-year washout period resulted in similar or stronger associations.

Conclusions: Depression constitutes a substantial morbidity burden in the working-age population. Specific adverse working conditions were associated with first-time and recurrent treatment for depression and improving these may contribute to reducing the onset and recurrence of depression.

目的:在没有个人抑郁症病史的人群中,社会心理工作环境中的不利因素与抑郁症的发病有关。然而,关于不利的工作因素是否也会导致抑郁症复发的证据却很少。本研究旨在前瞻性地考察社会心理工作环境中的因素是否与抑郁症的首次治疗和复发治疗有关:研究对象包括 24,226 名来自丹麦医院员工福利研究的参与者。我们测量了十个个人社会心理工作因素和三个理论构架(努力-回报不平衡、工作压力和工作场所社会资本)。我们通过登记因抑郁症(疾病和相关健康问题国际统计分类 10 [ICD-10]:F32和F33)以及丹麦国家登记处开具的抗抑郁药物处方(解剖治疗化学[ATC]:N06A)。我们估算了基线前无抑郁症治疗史(首次治疗)和有抑郁症治疗史(复发治疗)的人群在基线后两年内的工作因素与抑郁症治疗之间的关联。我们排除了基线前 6 个月内接受过治疗的参与者。在补充分析中,我们将清洗期延长至 2 年。我们对混杂因素进行了逻辑回归分析:在21156名(87%)无抑郁症治疗史的参与者中,有350人(1.7%)在随访期间接受了首次治疗。在 3070 名(13%)有治疗史的参与者中,353 人(11%)在随访期间接受过复发性治疗。与没有抑郁症病史的人相比,有抑郁症病史的人普遍报告工作环境更为不利。基线受欺凌的程度(比值比 [OR] = 1.72,95% 置信区间 [95%CI]:1.30-2.32),以及在一定程度上对工作安排的低影响(比值比 [OR] = 1.27,95% CI:0.97-1.66)和工作压力(比值比 [OR] = 1.24,95% CI:0.97-1.57),与随访期间首次接受抑郁症治疗有关。基线受欺凌(OR = 1.40,95% CI:1.04-1.88)、缺乏合作(OR = 1.31,95% CI:1.03-1.67)和工作控制力低(OR = 1.27,95% CI:1.00-1.62)与随访期间抑郁症的复发治疗有关。然而,大多数工作因素与抑郁症治疗无关。结论:抑郁症是一种严重的疾病:结论:抑郁症对工作年龄人口的发病率造成了巨大的负担。特定的不利工作条件与抑郁症的首次和复发治疗有关,改善这些条件可能有助于减少抑郁症的发病和复发。
{"title":"Associations between psychosocial work environment factors and first-time and recurrent treatment for depression: a prospective cohort study of 24,226 employees.","authors":"J Mathisen, T-L Nguyen, I E H Madsen, T Xu, J H Jensen, J K Sørensen, R Rugulies, N H Rod","doi":"10.1017/S2045796024000167","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S2045796024000167","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Adverse factors in the psychosocial work environment are associated with the onset of depression among those without a personal history of depression. However, the evidence is sparse regarding whether adverse work factors can also play a role in depression recurrence. This study aimed to prospectively examine whether factors in the psychosocial work environment are associated with first-time and recurrent treatment for depression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 24,226 participants from the Danish Well-being in Hospital Employees study. We measured ten individual psychosocial work factors and three theoretical constructs (effort-reward imbalance, job strain and workplace social capital). We ascertained treatment for depression through registrations of hospital contacts for depression (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems version 10 [ICD-10]: F32 and F33) and redeemed prescriptions of antidepressant medication (Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical [ATC]: N06A) in Danish national registries. We estimated the associations between work factors and treatment for depression for up to 2 years after baseline among those without (first-time treatment) and with (recurrent treatment) a personal history of treatment for depression before baseline. We excluded participants registered with treatment within 6 months before baseline. In supplementary analyses, we extended this washout period to up to 2 years. We applied logistic regression analyses with adjustment for confounding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 21,156 (87%) participants without a history of treatment for depression, 350 (1.7%) had first-time treatment during follow-up. Among the 3070 (13%) participants with treatment history, 353 (11%) had recurrent treatment during follow-up. Those with a history of depression generally reported a more adverse work environment than those without such a history. Baseline exposure to bullying (odds ratio [OR] = 1.72, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.30-2.32), and to some extent also low influence on work schedule (OR = 1.27, 95% CI: 0.97-1.66) and job strain (OR = 1.24, 95% CI: 0.97-1.57), was associated with first-time treatment for depression during follow-up. Baseline exposure to bullying (OR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.04-1.88), lack of collaboration (OR = 1.31, 95% CI: 1.03-1.67) and low job control (OR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.00-1.62) were associated with recurrent treatment for depression during follow-up. However, most work factors were not associated with treatment for depression. Using a 2-year washout period resulted in similar or stronger associations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Depression constitutes a substantial morbidity burden in the working-age population. Specific adverse working conditions were associated with first-time and recurrent treatment for depression and improving these may contribute to reducing the onset and recurrence of depression.</p>","PeriodicalId":11787,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10951797/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140143036","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effectiveness of a WHO self-help psychological intervention to alleviate stress among healthcare workers in the context of COVID-19 in China: a randomised controlled trial. 在中国COVID-19背景下,世界卫生组织的自助心理干预对缓解医护人员压力的效果:随机对照试验。
IF 8.1 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-03-07 DOI: 10.1017/S2045796024000106
Jinghua Li, Rui Luo, Pengyue Guo, Dexing Zhang, Phoenix K H Mo, Anise M S Wu, Meiqi Xin, Menglin Shang, Yuqi Cai, Xu Wang, Mingyu Chen, Yiling He, Luxin Zheng, Jinying Huang, Roman Dong Xu, Joseph T F Lau, Jing Gu, Brian J Hall

Aims: To examine the effectiveness of Self-Help Plus (SH+) as an intervention for alleviating stress levels and mental health problems among healthcare workers.

Methods: This was a prospective, two-arm, unblinded, parallel-designed randomised controlled trial. Participants were recruited at all levels of medical facilities within all municipal districts of Guangzhou. Eligible participants were adult healthcare workers experiencing psychological stress (10-item Perceived Stress Scale scores of ≥15) but without serious mental health problems or active suicidal ideation. A self-help psychological intervention developed by the World Health Organization in alleviating psychological stress and preventing the development of mental health problems. The primary outcome was psychological stress, assessed at the 3-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes were depression symptoms, anxiety symptoms, insomnia, positive affect (PA) and self-kindness assessed at the 3-month follow-up.

Results: Between November 2021 and April 2022, 270 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned to either SH+ (n = 135) or the control group (n = 135). The SH+ group had significantly lower stress at the 3-month follow-up (b = -1.23, 95% CI = -2.36, -0.10, p = 0.033) compared to the control group. The interaction effect indicated that the intervention effect in reducing stress differed over time (b = -0.89, 95% CI = -1.50, -0.27, p = 0.005). Analysis of the secondary outcomes suggested that SH+ led to statistically significant improvements in most of the secondary outcomes, including depression, insomnia, PA and self-kindness.

Conclusions: This is the first known randomised controlled trial ever conducted to improve stress and mental health problems among healthcare workers experiencing psychological stress in a low-resource setting. SH+ was found to be an effective strategy for alleviating psychological stress and reducing symptoms of common mental problems. SH+ has the potential to be scaled-up as a public health strategy to reduce the burden of mental health problems in healthcare workers exposed to high levels of stress.

目的:研究 "自助加"(SH+)作为一种干预措施对缓解医护人员压力水平和心理健康问题的有效性:这是一项前瞻性、双臂、无盲、平行设计的随机对照试验。参与者在广州市各区的各级医疗机构中招募。符合条件的参与者均为有心理压力(10项知觉压力量表得分≥15分)但无严重心理健康问题或主动自杀意念的成年医护人员。世界卫生组织为缓解心理压力和预防心理健康问题的发展而开发的一种自助式心理干预方法。主要结果是心理压力,在 3 个月的随访中进行评估。次要结果是抑郁症状、焦虑症状、失眠、积极情绪(PA)和3个月随访时的自我亲切感:2021年11月至2022年4月,270名参与者被随机分配到SH+组(135人)或对照组(135人)。与对照组相比,SH+ 组在 3 个月的随访中压力明显降低(b = -1.23, 95% CI = -2.36, -0.10,p = 0.033)。交互效应表明,干预在减轻压力方面的效果随时间推移而不同(b = -0.89,95% CI = -1.50, -0.27,p = 0.005)。对次要结果的分析表明,SH+ 对大多数次要结果都有统计学意义的改善,包括抑郁、失眠、PA 和自我亲切感:这是已知的第一项随机对照试验,旨在改善低资源环境下医护人员的压力和心理健康问题。研究发现,SH+ 是缓解心理压力和减少常见精神问题症状的有效策略。SH+有可能作为一种公共卫生策略加以推广,以减轻面临高度压力的医护人员的心理健康问题负担。
{"title":"Effectiveness of a WHO self-help psychological intervention to alleviate stress among healthcare workers in the context of COVID-19 in China: a randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Jinghua Li, Rui Luo, Pengyue Guo, Dexing Zhang, Phoenix K H Mo, Anise M S Wu, Meiqi Xin, Menglin Shang, Yuqi Cai, Xu Wang, Mingyu Chen, Yiling He, Luxin Zheng, Jinying Huang, Roman Dong Xu, Joseph T F Lau, Jing Gu, Brian J Hall","doi":"10.1017/S2045796024000106","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S2045796024000106","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To examine the effectiveness of Self-Help Plus (SH+) as an intervention for alleviating stress levels and mental health problems among healthcare workers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective, two-arm, unblinded, parallel-designed randomised controlled trial. Participants were recruited at all levels of medical facilities within all municipal districts of Guangzhou. Eligible participants were adult healthcare workers experiencing psychological stress (10-item Perceived Stress Scale scores of ≥15) but without serious mental health problems or active suicidal ideation. A self-help psychological intervention developed by the World Health Organization in alleviating psychological stress and preventing the development of mental health problems. The primary outcome was psychological stress, assessed at the 3-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes were depression symptoms, anxiety symptoms, insomnia, positive affect (PA) and self-kindness assessed at the 3-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between November 2021 and April 2022, 270 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned to either SH+ (<i>n</i> = 135) or the control group (<i>n</i> = 135). The SH+ group had significantly lower stress at the 3-month follow-up (<i>b</i> = -1.23, 95% CI = -2.36, -0.10, <i>p</i> = 0.033) compared to the control group. The interaction effect indicated that the intervention effect in reducing stress differed over time (<i>b</i> = -0.89, 95% CI = -1.50, -0.27, <i>p</i> = 0.005). Analysis of the secondary outcomes suggested that SH+ led to statistically significant improvements in most of the secondary outcomes, including depression, insomnia, PA and self-kindness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first known randomised controlled trial ever conducted to improve stress and mental health problems among healthcare workers experiencing psychological stress in a low-resource setting. SH+ was found to be an effective strategy for alleviating psychological stress and reducing symptoms of common mental problems. SH+ has the potential to be scaled-up as a public health strategy to reduce the burden of mental health problems in healthcare workers exposed to high levels of stress.</p>","PeriodicalId":11787,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10940054/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140048977","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Using an intersectionality-based approach to evaluate mental health services use among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver. 采用基于交叉性的方法,评估蒙特利尔、多伦多和温哥华的男同性恋、双性恋和其他男男性行为者使用心理健康服务的情况。
IF 8.1 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-03-05 DOI: 10.1017/S2045796024000143
Ivan Marbaniang, Erica E M Moodie, Eric Latimer, Shayna Skakoon-Sparling, Trevor A Hart, Daniel Grace, David M Moore, Nathan J Lachowsky, Jody Jollimore, Gilles Lambert, Terri Zhang, Milada Dvorakova, Joseph Cox

Aims: To cope with homonegativity-generated stress, gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (GBM) use more mental health services (MHS) compared with heterosexual men. Most previous research on MHS among GBM uses data from largely white HIV-negative samples. Using an intersectionality-based approach, we evaluated the concomitant impact of racialization and HIV stigma on MHS use among GBM, through the mediating role of perceived discrimination (PD).

Methods: We used baseline data from 2371 GBM enrolled in the Engage cohort study, collected between 2017 and 2019, in Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver, using respondent-driven sampling. The exposure was GBM groups: Group 1 (n = 1376): white HIV-negative; Group 2 (n = 327): white living with HIV; Group 3 (n = 577): racialized as non-white HIV-negative; Group 4 (n = 91): racialized as non-white living with HIV. The mediator was interpersonal PD scores measured using the Everyday Discrimination Scale (5-item version). The outcome was MHS use (yes/no) in the prior 6 months. We fit a three-way decomposition of causal mediation effects utilizing the imputation method for natural effect models. We obtained odds ratios (ORs) for pure direct effect (PDE, unmediated effect), pure indirect effect (PIE, mediated effect), mediated interaction effect (MIE, effect due to interaction between the exposure and mediator) and total effect (TE, overall effect). Analyses controlled for age, chronic mental health condition, Canadian citizenship, being cisgender and city of enrolment.

Results: Mean PD scores were highest for racialized HIV-negative GBM (10.3, SD: 5.0) and lowest for white HIV-negative GBM (8.4, SD: 3.9). MHS use was highest in white GBM living with HIV (GBMHIV) (40.4%) and lowest in racialized HIV-negative GBM (26.9%). Compared with white HIV-negative GBM, white GBMHIV had higher TE (OR: 1.71; 95% CI: 1.27, 2.29) and PDE (OR: 1.68; 95% CI: 1.27, 2.24), and racialized HIV-negative GBM had higher PIE (OR: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.17). Effects for racialized GBMHIV did not significantly differ from those of white HIV-negative GBM. MIEs across all groups were comparable.

Conclusions: Higher MHS use was observed among white GBMHIV compared with white HIV-negative GBM. PD positively mediated MHS use only among racialized HIV-negative GBM. MHS may need to take into account the intersecting impact of homonegativity, racism and HIV stigma on the mental health of GBM.

目的:与异性恋男性相比,同性恋、双性恋和其他男性同性性行为者(GBM)为了应对同性恋产生的压力,会使用更多的心理健康服务(MHS)。之前关于男同性恋、双性恋和其他男男性行为者的心理健康服务的研究大多使用的是白人 HIV 阴性样本的数据。我们采用基于交叉性的方法,通过感知歧视(PD)的中介作用,评估了种族化和 HIV 耻辱感对男男性行为者使用心理健康服务的影响:我们使用了 2017 年至 2019 年期间在蒙特利尔、多伦多和温哥华通过受访者驱动抽样收集的参与队列研究的 2371 名 GBM 的基线数据。暴露对象为 GBM 组:第 1 组(n = 1376):HIV 阴性的白人;第 2 组(n = 327):感染 HIV 的白人;第 3 组(n = 577):种族化为 HIV 阴性的非白人;第 4 组(n = 91):种族化为感染 HIV 的非白人。调解因素是使用日常歧视量表(5 个项目版)测量的人际 PD 分数。结果是在过去 6 个月中使用过 MHS(是/否)。我们利用自然效应模型的估算方法对因果中介效应进行了三向分解。我们得出了纯直接效应(PDE,非中介效应)、纯间接效应(PIE,中介效应)、中介交互效应(MIE,暴露与中介之间的交互效应)和总效应(TE,总体效应)的几率比(ORs)。分析对年龄、慢性精神健康状况、加拿大公民身份、顺式性别和入学城市进行了控制:种族化 HIV 阴性 GBM 的 PD 平均得分最高(10.3,SD:5.0),白人 HIV 阴性 GBM 的 PD 平均得分最低(8.4,SD:3.9)。在感染艾滋病毒的白人 GBM(GBMHIV)中,使用 MHS 的比例最高(40.4%),而在艾滋病毒阴性的种族化 GBM 中,使用 MHS 的比例最低(26.9%)。与白人 HIV 阴性 GBM 相比,白人 GBMHIV 的 TE(OR:1.71;95% CI:1.27,2.29)和 PDE(OR:1.68;95% CI:1.27,2.24)更高,而种族化 HIV 阴性 GBM 的 PIE(OR:1.09;95% CI:1.02,1.17)更高。种族化 GBMHIV 的效应与白人 HIV 阴性 GBM 的效应无明显差异。所有群体的 MIEs 具有可比性:结论:与白人 HIV 阴性 GBM 相比,白人 GBMHIV 使用 MHS 的比例更高。只有在种族化的 HIV 阴性 GBM 中,PD 对 MHS 的使用有积极的中介作用。心理健康服务可能需要考虑到同性恋、种族主义和 HIV 耻辱感对 GBM 心理健康的交叉影响。
{"title":"Using an intersectionality-based approach to evaluate mental health services use among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver.","authors":"Ivan Marbaniang, Erica E M Moodie, Eric Latimer, Shayna Skakoon-Sparling, Trevor A Hart, Daniel Grace, David M Moore, Nathan J Lachowsky, Jody Jollimore, Gilles Lambert, Terri Zhang, Milada Dvorakova, Joseph Cox","doi":"10.1017/S2045796024000143","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S2045796024000143","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To cope with homonegativity-generated stress, gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (GBM) use more mental health services (MHS) compared with heterosexual men. Most previous research on MHS among GBM uses data from largely white HIV-negative samples. Using an intersectionality-based approach, we evaluated the concomitant impact of racialization and HIV stigma on MHS use among GBM, through the mediating role of perceived discrimination (PD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used baseline data from 2371 GBM enrolled in the Engage cohort study, collected between 2017 and 2019, in Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver, using respondent-driven sampling. The exposure was GBM groups: <b>Group 1</b> (<i>n</i> = 1376): white HIV-negative; <b>Group 2</b> (<i>n</i> = 327): white living with HIV; <b>Group 3</b> (<i>n</i> = 577): racialized as non-white HIV-negative; <b>Group 4</b> (<i>n</i> = 91): racialized as non-white living with HIV. The mediator was interpersonal PD scores measured using the Everyday Discrimination Scale (5-item version). The outcome was MHS use (yes/no) in the prior 6 months. We fit a three-way decomposition of causal mediation effects utilizing the imputation method for natural effect models. We obtained odds ratios (ORs) for pure direct effect (PDE, unmediated effect), pure indirect effect (PIE, mediated effect), mediated interaction effect (MIE, effect due to interaction between the exposure and mediator) and total effect (TE, overall effect). Analyses controlled for age, chronic mental health condition, Canadian citizenship, being cisgender and city of enrolment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean PD scores were highest for racialized HIV-negative GBM (10.3, SD: 5.0) and lowest for white HIV-negative GBM (8.4, SD: 3.9). MHS use was highest in white GBM living with HIV (GBMHIV) (40.4%) and lowest in racialized HIV-negative GBM (26.9%). Compared with white HIV-negative GBM, white GBMHIV had higher TE (OR: 1.71; 95% CI: 1.27, 2.29) and PDE (OR: 1.68; 95% CI: 1.27, 2.24), and racialized HIV-negative GBM had higher PIE (OR: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.17). Effects for racialized GBMHIV did not significantly differ from those of white HIV-negative GBM. MIEs across all groups were comparable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Higher MHS use was observed among white GBMHIV compared with white HIV-negative GBM. PD positively mediated MHS use only among racialized HIV-negative GBM. MHS may need to take into account the intersecting impact of homonegativity, racism and HIV stigma on the mental health of GBM.</p>","PeriodicalId":11787,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10940056/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140027755","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Incidence of mental health diagnoses during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multinational network study. COVID-19 大流行期间精神健康诊断的发生率:一项多国网络研究。
IF 8.1 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-03-04 DOI: 10.1017/S2045796024000088
Yi Chai, Kenneth K C Man, Hao Luo, Carmen Olga Torre, Yun Kwok Wing, Joseph F Hayes, David P J Osborn, Wing Chung Chang, Xiaoyu Lin, Can Yin, Esther W Chan, Ivan C H Lam, Stephen Fortin, David M Kern, Dong Yun Lee, Rae Woong Park, Jae-Won Jang, Jing Li, Sarah Seager, Wallis C Y Lau, Ian C K Wong

Aims: Population-wide restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic may create barriers to mental health diagnosis. This study aims to examine changes in the number of incident cases and the incidence rates of mental health diagnoses during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: By using electronic health records from France, Germany, Italy, South Korea and the UK and claims data from the US, this study conducted interrupted time-series analyses to compare the monthly incident cases and the incidence of depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, alcohol misuse or dependence, substance misuse or dependence, bipolar disorders, personality disorders and psychoses diagnoses before (January 2017 to February 2020) and after (April 2020 to the latest available date of each database [up to November 2021]) the introduction of COVID-related restrictions.

Results: A total of 629,712,954 individuals were enrolled across nine databases. Following the introduction of restrictions, an immediate decline was observed in the number of incident cases of all mental health diagnoses in the US (rate ratios (RRs) ranged from 0.005 to 0.677) and in the incidence of all conditions in France, Germany, Italy and the US (RRs ranged from 0.002 to 0.422). In the UK, significant reductions were only observed in common mental illnesses. The number of incident cases and the incidence began to return to or exceed pre-pandemic levels in most countries from mid-2020 through 2021.

Conclusions: Healthcare providers should be prepared to deliver service adaptations to mitigate burdens directly or indirectly caused by delays in the diagnosis and treatment of mental health conditions.

目的:COVID-19 大流行期间的人口限制可能会对心理健康诊断造成障碍。本研究旨在探讨 COVID-19 大流行期间精神健康诊断的病例数和发病率的变化:本研究利用法国、德国、意大利、韩国和英国的电子健康记录以及美国的理赔数据,进行了间断时间序列分析,以比较在引入 COVID 相关限制措施之前(2017 年 1 月至 2020 年 2 月)和之后(2020 年 4 月至各数据库的最新可用日期[截至 2021 年 11 月])的每月抑郁障碍、焦虑障碍、酒精滥用或依赖、药物滥用或依赖、双相障碍、人格障碍和精神病诊断的事件病例数和发病率:九个数据库共登记了 629712954 人。限制措施实施后,美国所有精神健康诊断的病例数立即下降(比率比(RRs)从 0.005 到 0.677 不等),法国、德国、意大利和美国所有病症的发病率也立即下降(比率比从 0.002 到 0.422 不等)。在英国,只有常见精神疾病的发病率有明显下降。从 2020 年中期到 2021 年,大多数国家的病例数和发病率开始恢复或超过流行前的水平:结论:医疗服务提供者应做好准备,对服务进行调整,以减轻因精神疾病的诊断和治疗延误而直接或间接造成的负担。
{"title":"Incidence of mental health diagnoses during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multinational network study.","authors":"Yi Chai, Kenneth K C Man, Hao Luo, Carmen Olga Torre, Yun Kwok Wing, Joseph F Hayes, David P J Osborn, Wing Chung Chang, Xiaoyu Lin, Can Yin, Esther W Chan, Ivan C H Lam, Stephen Fortin, David M Kern, Dong Yun Lee, Rae Woong Park, Jae-Won Jang, Jing Li, Sarah Seager, Wallis C Y Lau, Ian C K Wong","doi":"10.1017/S2045796024000088","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S2045796024000088","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Population-wide restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic may create barriers to mental health diagnosis. This study aims to examine changes in the number of incident cases and the incidence rates of mental health diagnoses during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>By using electronic health records from France, Germany, Italy, South Korea and the UK and claims data from the US, this study conducted interrupted time-series analyses to compare the monthly incident cases and the incidence of depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, alcohol misuse or dependence, substance misuse or dependence, bipolar disorders, personality disorders and psychoses diagnoses before (January 2017 to February 2020) and after (April 2020 to the latest available date of each database [up to November 2021]) the introduction of COVID-related restrictions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 629,712,954 individuals were enrolled across nine databases. Following the introduction of restrictions, an immediate decline was observed in the number of incident cases of all mental health diagnoses in the US (rate ratios (RRs) ranged from 0.005 to 0.677) and in the incidence of all conditions in France, Germany, Italy and the US (RRs ranged from 0.002 to 0.422). In the UK, significant reductions were only observed in common mental illnesses. The number of incident cases and the incidence began to return to or exceed pre-pandemic levels in most countries from mid-2020 through 2021.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Healthcare providers should be prepared to deliver service adaptations to mitigate burdens directly or indirectly caused by delays in the diagnosis and treatment of mental health conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":11787,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10940053/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140021235","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Disparities in neighbourhood characteristics and 10-year dementia risk by nativity status. 按原籍身份划分的邻里特征差异和 10 年痴呆症风险。
IF 8.1 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-02-15 DOI: 10.1017/S2045796024000076
R Wong, D Soong

Aims: Prior research indicates that neighbourhood disadvantage increases dementia risk. There is, however, inconclusive evidence on the relationship between nativity and cognitive impairment. To our knowledge, our study is the first to analyse how nativity and neighbourhood interact to influence dementia risk.

Methods: Ten years of prospective cohort data (2011-2020) were retrieved from the National Health and Aging Trends Study, a nationally representative sample of 5,362 U.S. older adults aged 65+. Cox regression analysed time to dementia diagnosis using nativity status (foreign- or native-born) and composite scores for neighbourhood physical disorder (litter, graffiti and vacancies) and social cohesion (know, help and trust each other), after applying sampling weights and imputing missing data.

Results: In a weighted sample representing 26.9 million older adults, about 9.5% (n = 2.5 million) identified as foreign-born and 24.4% (n = 6.5 million) had an incident dementia diagnosis. Average baseline neighbourhood physical disorder was 0.19 (range 0-9), and baseline social cohesion was 4.28 (range 0-6). Baseline neighbourhood physical disorder was significantly higher among foreign-born (mean = 0.28) compared to native-born (mean = 0.18) older adults (t = -2.4, p = .02). Baseline neighbourhood social cohesion was significantly lower for foreign-born (mean = 3.57) compared to native-born (mean = 4.33) older adults (t = 5.5, p < .001). After adjusting for sociodemographic, health and neighbourhood variables, foreign-born older adults had a 51% significantly higher dementia risk (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.19-1.90, p < .01). There were no significant interactions for nativity with neighbourhood physical disorder or social cohesion.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that foreign-born older adults have higher neighbourhood physical disorder and lower social cohesion compared to native-born older adults. Despite the higher dementia risk, we observed for foreign-born older adults, and this relationship was not moderated by either neighbourhood physical disorder or social cohesion. Further research is needed to understand what factors are contributing to elevated dementia risk among foreign-born older adults.

目的:先前的研究表明,邻里关系不利会增加痴呆症风险。然而,关于祖籍与认知障碍之间的关系,目前尚无定论。据我们所知,我们的研究是第一项分析出生地和邻里如何相互作用影响痴呆症风险的研究:我们从 "全国健康与老龄化趋势研究"(National Health and Aging Trends Study)中获取了十年(2011-2020 年)的前瞻性队列数据。在应用抽样加权和缺失数据归因后,利用原籍身份(外国出生或本国出生)以及邻里关系混乱(垃圾、涂鸦和空缺)和社会凝聚力(相互了解、帮助和信任)的综合得分,对痴呆症诊断时间进行了考克斯回归分析:在代表 2,690 万老年人的加权样本中,约有 9.5%(n=250 万)的老年人在国外出生,24.4%(n=650 万)的老年人曾被诊断患有痴呆症。平均基线邻里身体失调率为 0.19(范围 0-9),基线社会凝聚力为 4.28(范围 0-6)。与本地出生的老年人(平均值 = 0.18)相比,外国出生的老年人(平均值 = 0.28)的邻里身体失调基线明显更高(t = -2.4,p = .02)。与本地出生的老年人(平均值 = 4.33)相比,外国出生的老年人(平均值 = 3.57)的基线邻里社会凝聚力明显较低(t = 5.5,p < .001)。在对社会人口学、健康和邻里变量进行调整后,外国出生的老年人患痴呆症的风险明显高出 51%(调整后危险比 = 1.51,95% CI = 1.19-1.90,p < .01)。出生地与邻里身体失调或社会凝聚力之间没有明显的交互作用:我们的研究结果表明,与本地出生的老年人相比,外国出生的老年人的邻里关系更混乱,社会凝聚力更低。尽管我们观察到外国出生的老年人患痴呆症的风险较高,但这种关系并没有被邻里关系混乱或社会凝聚力所调节。要了解是哪些因素导致外国出生的老年人患痴呆症的风险升高,还需要进一步的研究。
{"title":"Disparities in neighbourhood characteristics and 10-year dementia risk by nativity status.","authors":"R Wong, D Soong","doi":"10.1017/S2045796024000076","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S2045796024000076","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Prior research indicates that neighbourhood disadvantage increases dementia risk. There is, however, inconclusive evidence on the relationship between nativity and cognitive impairment. To our knowledge, our study is the first to analyse how nativity and neighbourhood interact to influence dementia risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten years of prospective cohort data (2011-2020) were retrieved from the National Health and Aging Trends Study, a nationally representative sample of 5,362 U.S. older adults aged 65+. Cox regression analysed time to dementia diagnosis using nativity status (foreign- or native-born) and composite scores for neighbourhood physical disorder (litter, graffiti and vacancies) and social cohesion (know, help and trust each other), after applying sampling weights and imputing missing data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a weighted sample representing 26.9 million older adults, about 9.5% (<i>n</i> = 2.5 million) identified as foreign-born and 24.4% (<i>n</i> = 6.5 million) had an incident dementia diagnosis. Average baseline neighbourhood physical disorder was 0.19 (range 0-9), and baseline social cohesion was 4.28 (range 0-6). Baseline neighbourhood physical disorder was significantly higher among foreign-born (mean = 0.28) compared to native-born (mean = 0.18) older adults (<i>t</i> = -2.4, <i>p</i> = .02). Baseline neighbourhood social cohesion was significantly lower for foreign-born (mean = 3.57) compared to native-born (mean = 4.33) older adults (<i>t</i> = 5.5, <i>p</i> < .001). After adjusting for sociodemographic, health and neighbourhood variables, foreign-born older adults had a 51% significantly higher dementia risk (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.19-1.90, <i>p</i> < .01). There were no significant interactions for nativity with neighbourhood physical disorder or social cohesion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that foreign-born older adults have higher neighbourhood physical disorder and lower social cohesion compared to native-born older adults. Despite the higher dementia risk, we observed for foreign-born older adults, and this relationship was not moderated by either neighbourhood physical disorder or social cohesion. Further research is needed to understand what factors are contributing to elevated dementia risk among foreign-born older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":11787,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.1,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10894703/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139734781","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A critical overview of emotion processing assessment in non-affective and affective psychoses. 非情感性精神病和情感性精神病的情感处理评估综述。
IF 8.1 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-02-15 DOI: 10.1017/S204579602400009X
Irene Gorrino, Maria Gloria Rossetti, Francesca Girelli, Marcella Bellani, Cinzia Perlini, Giulia Mattavelli

Aims: Patients with affective and non-affective psychoses show impairments in both the identification and discrimination of facial affect, which can significantly reduce their quality of life. The aim of this commentary is to present the strengths and weaknesses of the available instruments for a more careful evaluation of different stages of emotion processing in clinical and experimental studies on patients with non-affective and affective psychoses.

Methods: We reviewed the existing literature to identify different tests used to assess the ability to recognise (e.g. Ekman 60-Faces Test, Facial Emotion Identification Test and Penn Emotion Recognition Test) and to discriminate emotions (e.g. Face Emotion Discrimination Test and Emotion Differentiation Task).

Results: The current literature revealed that few studies combine instruments to differentiate between different levels of emotion processing disorders. The lack of comprehensive instruments that integrate emotion recognition and discrimination assessments prevents a full understanding of patients' conditions.

Conclusions: This commentary underlines the need for a detailed evaluation of emotion processing ability in patients with non-affective and affective psychoses, to characterise the disorder at early phases from the onset of the disease and to design rehabilitation treatments.

目的:情感性和非情感性精神病患者在识别和辨别面部情感方面均表现出障碍,这会大大降低他们的生活质量。本评论旨在介绍现有工具的优缺点,以便在对非情感性和情感性精神病患者进行临床和实验研究时,对不同阶段的情感处理进行更仔细的评估:方法:我们查阅了现有文献,以确定用于评估识别(如埃克曼60面测试、面部情绪识别测试和宾夕法尼亚情绪识别测试)和辨别情绪(如面部情绪辨别测试和情绪区分任务)能力的不同测试:目前的文献显示,很少有研究结合各种工具来区分不同程度的情绪加工障碍。缺乏整合情绪识别和辨别评估的综合工具阻碍了对患者病情的全面了解:这篇评论强调了对非情感性和情感性精神病患者的情感处理能力进行详细评估的必要性,以便在发病初期对该疾病进行定性,并设计康复治疗方案。
{"title":"A critical overview of emotion processing assessment in non-affective and affective psychoses.","authors":"Irene Gorrino, Maria Gloria Rossetti, Francesca Girelli, Marcella Bellani, Cinzia Perlini, Giulia Mattavelli","doi":"10.1017/S204579602400009X","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S204579602400009X","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Patients with affective and non-affective psychoses show impairments in both the identification and discrimination of facial affect, which can significantly reduce their quality of life. The aim of this commentary is to present the strengths and weaknesses of the available instruments for a more careful evaluation of different stages of emotion processing in clinical and experimental studies on patients with non-affective and affective psychoses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed the existing literature to identify different tests used to assess the ability to recognise (e.g. Ekman 60-Faces Test, Facial Emotion Identification Test and Penn Emotion Recognition Test) and to discriminate emotions (e.g. Face Emotion Discrimination Test and Emotion Differentiation Task).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The current literature revealed that few studies combine instruments to differentiate between different levels of emotion processing disorders. The lack of comprehensive instruments that integrate emotion recognition and discrimination assessments prevents a full understanding of patients' conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This commentary underlines the need for a detailed evaluation of emotion processing ability in patients with non-affective and affective psychoses, to characterise the disorder at early phases from the onset of the disease and to design rehabilitation treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":11787,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.1,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10894699/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139734780","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Somatic disease burden and depression risk in late life: a community-based study. 晚年躯体疾病负担与抑郁风险:一项基于社区的研究。
IF 8.1 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-02-08 DOI: 10.1017/S2045796024000064
Federico Triolo, Davide Liborio Vetrano, Linnea Sjöberg, Amaia Calderón-Larrañaga, Martino Belvederi Murri, Laura Fratiglioni, Serhiy Dekhtyar

Aims: Co-occurring somatic diseases exhibit complex clinical profiles, which can differentially impact the development of late-life depression. Within a community-based cohort, we aimed to explore the association between somatic disease burden, both in terms of the number of diseases and their patterns, and the incidence of depression in older people.

Methods: We analysed longitudinal data of depression- and dementia-free individuals aged 60+ years from the population-based Swedish National Study on Aging and Care in Kungsholmen. Depression diagnoses were clinically ascertained following the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition Text Revision over a 15-year follow-up. Somatic disease burden was assessed at baseline through a comprehensive list of chronic diseases obtained by combining information from clinical examinations, medication reviews and national registers and operationalized as (i) disease count and (ii) patterns of co-occurring diseases from latent class analysis. The association of somatic disease burden with depression incidence was investigated using Cox models, accounting for sociodemographic, lifestyle and clinical factors.

Results: The analytical sample comprised 2904 people (mean age, 73.2 [standard deviation (SD), 10.5]; female, 63.1%). Over the follow-up (mean length, 9.6 years [SD, 4 years]), 225 depression cases were detected. Each additional disease was associated with the occurrence of any depression in a dose-response manner (hazard ratio [HR], 1.16; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08, 1.24). As for disease patterns, individuals presenting with sensory/anaemia (HR, 1.91; 95% CI: 1.03, 3.53), thyroid/musculoskeletal (HR, 1.90; 95% CI: 1.06, 3.39) and cardiometabolic (HR, 2.77; 95% CI: 1.40, 5.46) patterns exhibited with higher depression hazards, compared to those without 2+ diseases (multimorbidity). In the subsample of multimorbid individuals (85%), only the cardiometabolic pattern remained associated with a higher depression hazard compared to the unspecific pattern (HR, 1.71; 95% CI: 1.02, 2.84).

Conclusions: Both number and patterns of co-occurring somatic diseases are associated with an increased risk of late-life depression. Mental health should be closely monitored among older adults with high somatic burden, especially if affected by cardiometabolic multimorbidity.

目的:并发的躯体疾病表现出复杂的临床特征,会对晚年抑郁症的发展产生不同程度的影响。在社区队列中,我们旨在探讨躯体疾病负担(包括疾病数量及其模式)与老年人抑郁症发病率之间的关联:我们分析了基于 Kungsholmen 人口的瑞典国家老龄化和护理研究中 60 岁以上无抑郁症和痴呆症患者的纵向数据。抑郁症诊断是根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版文本修订版进行临床确诊的,随访时间长达 15 年。躯体疾病负担在基线时通过综合慢性病清单进行评估,该清单通过临床检查、用药审查和国家登记册中的信息获得,并通过潜类分析以(i)疾病计数和(ii)并发疾病模式进行操作。在考虑了社会人口学、生活方式和临床因素后,采用 Cox 模型研究了躯体疾病负担与抑郁症发病率之间的关系:分析样本包括 2904 人(平均年龄 73.2 [标准差(SD)10.5];女性 63.1%)。在随访期间(平均 9.6 年[标准差,4 年]),共发现 225 例抑郁症病例。每增加一种疾病都与抑郁症的发生呈剂量反应关系(危险比 [HR],1.16;95% 置信区间 [CI]:1.08,1.24)。在疾病模式方面,与没有 2+ 疾病(多病共患)的患者相比,患有感官/贫血(HR,1.91;95% CI:1.03,3.53)、甲状腺/肌肉骨骼(HR,1.90;95% CI:1.06,3.39)和心脏代谢(HR,2.77;95% CI:1.40,5.46)模式的患者抑郁风险更高。在多病个体的子样本(85%)中,与非特异性模式相比,只有心脏代谢模式仍与较高的抑郁危险相关(HR,1.71;95% CI:1.02,2.84):并发躯体疾病的数量和模式都与晚年抑郁风险的增加有关。应密切关注躯体疾病负担较重的老年人的心理健康,尤其是受到心脏代谢多病并发症影响的老年人。
{"title":"Somatic disease burden and depression risk in late life: a community-based study.","authors":"Federico Triolo, Davide Liborio Vetrano, Linnea Sjöberg, Amaia Calderón-Larrañaga, Martino Belvederi Murri, Laura Fratiglioni, Serhiy Dekhtyar","doi":"10.1017/S2045796024000064","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S2045796024000064","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Co-occurring somatic diseases exhibit complex clinical profiles, which can differentially impact the development of late-life depression. Within a community-based cohort, we aimed to explore the association between somatic disease burden, both in terms of the number of diseases and their patterns, and the incidence of depression in older people.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed longitudinal data of depression- and dementia-free individuals aged 60+ years from the population-based Swedish National Study on Aging and Care in Kungsholmen. Depression diagnoses were clinically ascertained following the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition Text Revision over a 15-year follow-up. Somatic disease burden was assessed at baseline through a comprehensive list of chronic diseases obtained by combining information from clinical examinations, medication reviews and national registers and operationalized as (i) disease count and (ii) patterns of co-occurring diseases from latent class analysis. The association of somatic disease burden with depression incidence was investigated using Cox models, accounting for sociodemographic, lifestyle and clinical factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analytical sample comprised 2904 people (mean age, 73.2 [standard deviation (SD), 10.5]; female, 63.1%). Over the follow-up (mean length, 9.6 years [SD, 4 years]), 225 depression cases were detected. Each additional disease was associated with the occurrence of any depression in a dose-response manner (hazard ratio [HR], 1.16; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08, 1.24). As for disease patterns, individuals presenting with sensory/anaemia (HR, 1.91; 95% CI: 1.03, 3.53), thyroid/musculoskeletal (HR, 1.90; 95% CI: 1.06, 3.39) and cardiometabolic (HR, 2.77; 95% CI: 1.40, 5.46) patterns exhibited with higher depression hazards, compared to those without 2+ diseases (multimorbidity). In the subsample of multimorbid individuals (85%), only the cardiometabolic pattern remained associated with a higher depression hazard compared to the unspecific pattern (HR, 1.71; 95% CI: 1.02, 2.84).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both number and patterns of co-occurring somatic diseases are associated with an increased risk of late-life depression. Mental health should be closely monitored among older adults with high somatic burden, especially if affected by cardiometabolic multimorbidity.</p>","PeriodicalId":11787,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.1,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10894701/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139702149","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1