Pub Date : 2024-11-13DOI: 10.1017/S2045796024000702
Isil Ezgi Celik
{"title":"Rethinking Outsider Art in the digital age: an overview of Cara Macwilliam's artistic practice.","authors":"Isil Ezgi Celik","doi":"10.1017/S2045796024000702","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S2045796024000702","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11787,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","volume":"33 ","pages":"e66"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11669796/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142615495","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-08DOI: 10.1017/S2045796024000659
N Chilman, P Schofield, S McManus, A Ronaldson, A Stagg, J Das-Munshi
Aims: The associations of prior homelessness with current health are unknown. Using nationally representative data collected in private households in England, this study aimed to examine Common Mental Disorders (CMDs), physical health, alcohol/substance dependence, and multimorbidities in people who formerly experienced homelessness compared to people who never experienced homelessness.
Methods: This cross-sectional study utilised data from the 2007 and 2014 Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Surveys. Former homelessness and current physical health problems were self-reported. Current CMDs, alcohol dependence and substance dependence were ascertained using structured validated scales. Survey-weighted logistic regression was used to compare multimorbidities (conditions in combination) for participants who formerly experienced homelessness with those who had never experienced homelessness, adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics, smoking status and adverse experiences. Population attributable fractions (PAFs) were calculated.
Results: Of 13,859 people in the sample, 535 formerly experienced homelessness (3.6%, 95% CI 3.2-4.0). 44.8% of people who formerly experienced homelessness had CMDs (95% CI 40.2-49.5), compared to 15.0% (95% CI 14.3-15.7) for those who had never experienced homelessness. There were substantial associations between prior homelessness and physical multimorbidity (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.98, 95% CI 1.53-2.57), CMD-physical multimorbidity (aOR 3.43, 95% CI 2.77-4.25), CMD-alcohol/substance multimorbidity (aOR 3.53, 95% CI 2.49-5.01) and trimorbidity (CMD-alcohol/substance-physical multimorbidity) (aOR 3.26, 95% CI 2.20-4.83), in models adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics and smoking. After further adjustment for adverse experiences, associations attenuated but persisted for physical multimorbidity (aOR 1.40, 95% CI 1.10-1.79) and CMD-physical multimorbidity (aOR 1.55, 95% CI 1.20-2.00). The largest PAFs were observed for CMD-alcohol/substance multimorbidity (17%) and trimorbidity (16%).
Conclusions: Even in people currently rehoused, marked inequities across multimorbidities remained evident, highlighting the need for longer-term integrated support for people who have previously experienced homelessness.
目的:以前无家可归与目前健康状况之间的关系尚不清楚。本研究利用在英格兰私人家庭中收集的具有全国代表性的数据,旨在研究曾有过无家可归经历的人与从未有过无家可归经历的人相比在常见精神障碍(CMDs)、身体健康、酒精/药物依赖和多病症方面的情况:这项横断面研究利用了 2007 年和 2014 年成人精神病发病率调查的数据。曾经的无家可归经历和目前的身体健康问题均为自我报告。目前的慢性精神疾病、酒精依赖和药物依赖通过结构化验证量表确定。调查加权逻辑回归用于比较曾有过无家可归经历的参与者与从未有过无家可归经历的参与者的多病症(合并症),并对社会人口特征、吸烟状况和不良经历进行调整。结果显示,在 13,859 名研究对象中,有 13,859 人患有多种疾病(合并症):在 13859 个样本中,有 535 人曾有过无家可归的经历(3.6%,95% CI 3.2-4.0)。44.8%曾经无家可归的人患有CMD(95% CI 40.2-49.5),而从未有过无家可归经历的人患有CMD的比例为15.0%(95% CI 14.3-15.7)。在调整了社会人口学特征和吸烟的模型中,CMD-酒精/药物多病性(aOR 3.53,95% CI 2.49-5.01)和三联症(CMD-酒精/药物-躯体多病性)(aOR 3.26,95% CI 2.20-4.83)的相关性最高。进一步调整不良经历后,相关性减弱,但身体多病(aOR 1.40,95% CI 1.10-1.79)和慢性阻塞性肺病-身体多病(aOR 1.55,95% CI 1.20-2.00)的相关性持续存在。在 CMD-酒精/药物多病症(17%)和三病症(16%)中观察到的 PAFs 最大:即使在目前已重新安置的人群中,多种疾病之间的明显不平等仍然很明显,这凸显了为曾经经历过无家可归的人群提供长期综合支持的必要性。
{"title":"The public health significance of prior homelessness: findings on multimorbidity and mental health from a nationally representative survey.","authors":"N Chilman, P Schofield, S McManus, A Ronaldson, A Stagg, J Das-Munshi","doi":"10.1017/S2045796024000659","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S2045796024000659","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The associations of prior homelessness with current health are unknown. Using nationally representative data collected in private households in England, this study aimed to examine Common Mental Disorders (CMDs), physical health, alcohol/substance dependence, and multimorbidities in people who formerly experienced homelessness compared to people who never experienced homelessness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study utilised data from the 2007 and 2014 Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Surveys. Former homelessness and current physical health problems were self-reported. Current CMDs, alcohol dependence and substance dependence were ascertained using structured validated scales. Survey-weighted logistic regression was used to compare multimorbidities (conditions in combination) for participants who formerly experienced homelessness with those who had never experienced homelessness, adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics, smoking status and adverse experiences. Population attributable fractions (PAFs) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 13,859 people in the sample, 535 formerly experienced homelessness (3.6%, 95% CI 3.2-4.0). 44.8% of people who formerly experienced homelessness had CMDs (95% CI 40.2-49.5), compared to 15.0% (95% CI 14.3-15.7) for those who had never experienced homelessness. There were substantial associations between prior homelessness and physical multimorbidity (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.98, 95% CI 1.53-2.57), CMD-physical multimorbidity (aOR 3.43, 95% CI 2.77-4.25), CMD-alcohol/substance multimorbidity (aOR 3.53, 95% CI 2.49-5.01) and trimorbidity (CMD-alcohol/substance-physical multimorbidity) (aOR 3.26, 95% CI 2.20-4.83), in models adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics and smoking. After further adjustment for adverse experiences, associations attenuated but persisted for physical multimorbidity (aOR 1.40, 95% CI 1.10-1.79) and CMD-physical multimorbidity (aOR 1.55, 95% CI 1.20-2.00). The largest PAFs were observed for CMD-alcohol/substance multimorbidity (17%) and trimorbidity (16%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Even in people currently rehoused, marked inequities across multimorbidities remained evident, highlighting the need for longer-term integrated support for people who have previously experienced homelessness.</p>","PeriodicalId":11787,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","volume":"33 ","pages":"e63"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11669814/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142603911","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-07DOI: 10.1017/S2045796024000623
Jorien L Treur, Eva Lukas, Hannah M Sallis, Robyn E Wootton
Aims: At the basis of many important research questions is causality - does X causally impact Y? For behavioural and psychiatric traits, answering such questions can be particularly challenging, as they are highly complex and multifactorial. 'Triangulation' refers to prospectively choosing, conducting and integrating several methods to investigate a specific causal question. If different methods, with different sources of bias, all indicate a causal effect, the finding is much less likely to be spurious. While triangulation can be a powerful approach, its interpretation differs across (sub)fields and there are no formal guidelines. Here, we aim to provide clarity and guidance around the process of triangulation for behavioural and psychiatric epidemiology, so that results of existing triangulation studies can be better interpreted, and new triangulation studies better designed.
Methods: We first introduce the concept of triangulation and how it is applied in epidemiological investigations of behavioural and psychiatric traits. Next, we put forth a systematic step-by-step guide, that can be used to design a triangulation study (accompanied by a worked example). Finally, we provide important general recommendations for future studies.
Results: While the literature contains varying interpretations, triangulation generally refers to an investigation that assesses the robustness of a potential causal finding by explicitly combining different approaches. This may include multiple types of statistical methods, the same method applied in multiple samples, or multiple different measurements of the variable(s) of interest. In behavioural and psychiatric epidemiology, triangulation commonly includes prospective cohort studies, natural experiments and/or genetically informative designs (including the increasingly popular method of Mendelian randomization). The guide that we propose aids the planning and interpreting of triangulation by prompting crucial considerations. Broadly, its steps are as follows: determine your causal question, draw a directed acyclic graph, identify available resources and samples, identify suitable methodological approaches, further specify the causal question for each method, explicate the effects of potential biases and, pre-specify expected results. We illustrated the guide's use by considering the question: 'Does maternal tobacco smoking during pregnancy cause offspring depression?'.
Conclusions: In the current era of big data, and with increasing (public) availability of large-scale datasets, triangulation will become increasingly relevant in identifying robust risk factors for adverse mental health outcomes. Our hope is that this review and guide will provide clarity and direction, as well as stimulate more researchers to apply triangulation to causal questions around behavioural and psychiatric traits.
目的:许多重要研究问题的基础是因果关系--X 是否会对 Y 产生因果影响?对于行为和精神特质而言,回答这类问题尤其具有挑战性,因为它们非常复杂,而且是多因素的。三角测量 "指的是前瞻性地选择、实施和整合几种方法来研究特定的因果问题。如果具有不同偏差来源的不同方法都能显示出因果效应,那么这一发现的虚假性就会大大降低。虽然三角测量是一种强大的方法,但不同(子)领域对它的解释各不相同,也没有正式的指导原则。在此,我们旨在为行为和精神流行病学的三角测量过程提供明确的指导,以便更好地解释现有三角测量研究的结果,更好地设计新的三角测量研究:我们首先介绍了三角测量的概念,以及如何将其应用于行为和精神特征的流行病学调查。接下来,我们提出了一个系统的分步指南,可用于设计三角测量研究(附带一个工作示例)。最后,我们为今后的研究提供了重要的一般性建议:虽然文献中有不同的解释,但三角测量一般是指通过明确结合不同的方法来评估潜在因果发现的稳健性的调查。这可能包括多种类型的统计方法、在多个样本中应用相同的方法或对相关变量进行多种不同的测量。在行为和精神流行病学中,三角测量通常包括前瞻性队列研究、自然实验和/或遗传信息设计(包括日益流行的孟德尔随机化方法)。我们提出的指南通过提示关键的注意事项来帮助规划和解释三角测量。大体上,其步骤如下:确定因果问题,绘制有向无环图,确定可用资源和样本,确定合适的方法,进一步明确每种方法的因果问题,解释潜在偏差的影响,以及预先指定预期结果。我们以 "母亲在怀孕期间吸烟是否会导致后代抑郁?在当前的大数据时代,随着大规模数据集的(公开)可用性不断提高,三角测量法在确定不良心理健康结果的可靠风险因素方面将变得越来越重要。我们希望这篇综述和指南能提供清晰的思路和方向,并激励更多研究人员将三角测量法应用于行为和精神特征的因果问题。
{"title":"A guide for planning triangulation studies to investigate complex causal questions in behavioural and psychiatric research.","authors":"Jorien L Treur, Eva Lukas, Hannah M Sallis, Robyn E Wootton","doi":"10.1017/S2045796024000623","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S2045796024000623","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>At the basis of many important research questions is causality - does X causally impact Y? For behavioural and psychiatric traits, answering such questions can be particularly challenging, as they are highly complex and multifactorial. 'Triangulation' refers to prospectively choosing, conducting and integrating several methods to investigate a specific causal question. If different methods, with different sources of bias, all indicate a causal effect, the finding is much less likely to be spurious. While triangulation can be a powerful approach, its interpretation differs across (sub)fields and there are no formal guidelines. Here, we aim to provide clarity and guidance around the process of triangulation for behavioural and psychiatric epidemiology, so that results of existing triangulation studies can be better interpreted, and new triangulation studies better designed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We first introduce the concept of triangulation and how it is applied in epidemiological investigations of behavioural and psychiatric traits. Next, we put forth a systematic step-by-step guide, that can be used to design a triangulation study (accompanied by a worked example). Finally, we provide important general recommendations for future studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While the literature contains varying interpretations, triangulation generally refers to an investigation that assesses the robustness of a potential causal finding by explicitly combining different approaches. This may include multiple types of statistical methods, the same method applied in multiple samples, or multiple different measurements of the variable(s) of interest. In behavioural and psychiatric epidemiology, triangulation commonly includes prospective cohort studies, natural experiments and/or genetically informative designs (including the increasingly popular method of Mendelian randomization). The guide that we propose aids the planning and interpreting of triangulation by prompting crucial considerations. Broadly, its steps are as follows: determine your causal question, draw a directed acyclic graph, identify available resources and samples, identify suitable methodological approaches, further specify the causal question for each method, explicate the effects of potential biases and, pre-specify expected results. We illustrated the guide's use by considering the question: 'Does maternal tobacco smoking during pregnancy cause offspring depression?'.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the current era of big data, and with increasing (public) availability of large-scale datasets, triangulation will become increasingly relevant in identifying robust risk factors for adverse mental health outcomes. Our hope is that this review and guide will provide clarity and direction, as well as stimulate more researchers to apply triangulation to causal questions around behavioural and psychiatric traits.</p>","PeriodicalId":11787,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","volume":"33 ","pages":"e61"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7616800/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142590257","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-07DOI: 10.1017/S2045796024000647
Zeno Di Valerio, Daniela Fortuna, Marco Montalti, Lucia Alberghini, Anna Caterina Leucci, Alessio Saponaro, Elisa Sangiorgi, Elena Berti, Maurizia Rolli, Dario Tedesco
Background: Depressive disorders are a major public health issue in Western societies, particularly among adolescents, young adults and women. The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated mental health challenges, increasing depression and anxiety symptoms, especially in younger people. This study focuses on the hard-hit Emilia-Romagna Region (ERR) in Italy, examining changes in antidepressant (AD) drug use post-COVID-19 to understand the pandemic's effect on mental health.
Methods: A population-based interrupted time series design and a segmented regression analysis was carried out on ERR pharmaceutical data (FED, direct dispensation pharmaceuticals, AFT, territorial pharmaceutical assistance) out to estimate changes in AD use during the three pandemic years (2020, 2021 and 2022) compared to 2017-2019.Analyses were stratified by age, gender, citizenship, population density of the area of residence.
Results: A notable increase in AD consumption compared to what was expected was observed among younger age groups, and especially in females. In the 12-19 age group, a gradual increase was recorded from January 2021 until it reached +48% in 2022 (+58% among women, +30% among men). An even more remarkable growth in AD usage among non-Italian residents in the same age group was recorded compared to expected. A relevant increase, although smaller, was detected among individuals in the 20-34 age group, with a peak of +9% in 2022. These differences persisted up until the end of the observation period.
Conclusions: The study suggests that the COVID-19 pandemic may have had a lasting negative impact on the mental health of younger individuals. The observed increase in AD use may foreshadow a potential long-term need for enhanced mental healthcare and services directed at this subpopulation.
{"title":"Surge in antidepressant usage among adolescents and young adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: insights from an interrupted time series analysis.","authors":"Zeno Di Valerio, Daniela Fortuna, Marco Montalti, Lucia Alberghini, Anna Caterina Leucci, Alessio Saponaro, Elisa Sangiorgi, Elena Berti, Maurizia Rolli, Dario Tedesco","doi":"10.1017/S2045796024000647","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S2045796024000647","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Depressive disorders are a major public health issue in Western societies, particularly among adolescents, young adults and women. The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated mental health challenges, increasing depression and anxiety symptoms, especially in younger people. This study focuses on the hard-hit Emilia-Romagna Region (ERR) in Italy, examining changes in antidepressant (AD) drug use post-COVID-19 to understand the pandemic's effect on mental health.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A population-based interrupted time series design and a segmented regression analysis was carried out on ERR pharmaceutical data (FED, direct dispensation pharmaceuticals, AFT, territorial pharmaceutical assistance) out to estimate changes in AD use during the three pandemic years (2020, 2021 and 2022) compared to 2017-2019.Analyses were stratified by age, gender, citizenship, population density of the area of residence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A notable increase in AD consumption compared to what was expected was observed among younger age groups, and especially in females. In the 12-19 age group, a gradual increase was recorded from January 2021 until it reached +48% in 2022 (+58% among women, +30% among men). An even more remarkable growth in AD usage among non-Italian residents in the same age group was recorded compared to expected. A relevant increase, although smaller, was detected among individuals in the 20-34 age group, with a peak of +9% in 2022. These differences persisted up until the end of the observation period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study suggests that the COVID-19 pandemic may have had a lasting negative impact on the mental health of younger individuals. The observed increase in AD use may foreshadow a potential long-term need for enhanced mental healthcare and services directed at this subpopulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11787,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","volume":"33 ","pages":"e62"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11561682/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142603892","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-07DOI: 10.1017/S2045796024000489
Demelash Woldeyohannes Handiso, Jacqueline A Boyle, Eldho Paul, Frances Shawyer, Joanne C Enticott
Aims: Humanitarian migrants are at increased risk of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and elevated psychological distress. However, men and women often report varying degrees of stress and experience different challenges during migration. While studies have explored PTSD, psychological distress, gender, and resettlement stressors, they have not explored the interplay between these factors. This study aims to address that gap by investigating gender disparities in PTSD and psychological distress among humanitarian migrants in Australia, with a focus on the moderating role of socioeconomic factors.
Methods: This study used data from five waves of the Building a New Life in Australia (BNLA) survey, a longitudinal study of 2,399 humanitarian migrants who arrived in Australia in 2013. PTSD and psychological distress were measured using the PTSD-8 and Kessler-6 (K6) scales, respectively. We conducted generalised linear mixed-effect logistic regression analyses stratified by gender.
Results: Female humanitarian migrants exhibited a significantly higher prevalence of PTSD and psychological distress than males over five years of resettlement in Australia. Women facing financial hardship, unemployment, or residing in short-term housing reported greater levels of PTSD and distress compared to men.
Conclusions: Women facing financial hardship, inadequate housing, and unemployment exhibit higher rates of PTSD and psychological distress, underscoring the significant impact of socioeconomic factors. Addressing these challenges at both individual and systemic levels is essential for promoting well-being and managing mental health among female humanitarian migrants.
{"title":"Gender disparity and post-traumatic stress disorder and elevated psychological distress in humanitarian migrants resettled in Australia: the moderating role of socioeconomic factors.","authors":"Demelash Woldeyohannes Handiso, Jacqueline A Boyle, Eldho Paul, Frances Shawyer, Joanne C Enticott","doi":"10.1017/S2045796024000489","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S2045796024000489","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Humanitarian migrants are at increased risk of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and elevated psychological distress. However, men and women often report varying degrees of stress and experience different challenges during migration. While studies have explored PTSD, psychological distress, gender, and resettlement stressors, they have not explored the interplay between these factors. This study aims to address that gap by investigating gender disparities in PTSD and psychological distress among humanitarian migrants in Australia, with a focus on the moderating role of socioeconomic factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used data from five waves of the Building a New Life in Australia (BNLA) survey, a longitudinal study of 2,399 humanitarian migrants who arrived in Australia in 2013. PTSD and psychological distress were measured using the PTSD-8 and Kessler-6 (K6) scales, respectively. We conducted generalised linear mixed-effect logistic regression analyses stratified by gender.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Female humanitarian migrants exhibited a significantly higher prevalence of PTSD and psychological distress than males over five years of resettlement in Australia. Women facing financial hardship, unemployment, or residing in short-term housing reported greater levels of PTSD and distress compared to men.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Women facing financial hardship, inadequate housing, and unemployment exhibit higher rates of PTSD and psychological distress, underscoring the significant impact of socioeconomic factors. Addressing these challenges at both individual and systemic levels is essential for promoting well-being and managing mental health among female humanitarian migrants.</p>","PeriodicalId":11787,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","volume":"33 ","pages":"e60"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11561526/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142590259","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-06DOI: 10.1017/S2045796024000611
Pim Cuijpers, Clara Miguel, Mathias Harrer, Marketa Ciharova, Eirini Karyotaki
Aims: There is considerable evidence that waiting list (WL) control groups overestimate the effect sizes of psychotherapies for depression. It is not clear, however, what are the exact causes for this overestimation. We decided to conduct a meta-analytic study to compare trials on psychotherapy for depression with a WL control group against trials with a care-as-usual (CAU) control group.
Methods: We used an existing meta-analytic database of randomized trials comparing psychological treatments of adult depression with control groups and selected trials using a WL or a CAU control group. We used subgroup and meta-regression analyses to examine differences in effect sizes between WL and CAU controlled trials.
Results: We included 333 randomized controlled trials (472 comparisons; total number participants: 41,480), 141 with a WL and 195 with a CAU control group (3 included both). We found several significant differences between WL and CAU controlled trials (in type of therapy examined, treatment format, recency, target group, recruitment strategy, number of treatment arms and number of depression outcome measures). The overall effect size indicating the difference between treatment and control at post-test for all comparisons was g = 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.71; 0.84) with high heterogeneity (I2 = 84; 95% CI: 82; 85). A highly significant difference was observed between studies with a CAU control group (g = 0.63; 95% CI: 0.55; 0.71; I2 = 85; 95% CI: 83; 86) and studies with a WL (g = 0.95; 95% CI: 0.85; 1.04; I2 = 80; 95% CI: 78; 82; p for difference < 0.001). This difference remained significant in all sensitivity analyses, including a meta-regression analysis in which we adjusted for all differences in characteristics of studies with a WL versus CAU control group. We also found that pre-post effect sizes in WL control conditions (g = 0.37; 95% CI: 0.28; 0.46) were significantly smaller than change within CAU conditions (g = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.50; 0.78). We found few indications that pre-post effect sizes within therapy conditions differed between WL and CAU controlled trials.
Conclusions: WL control conditions considerably overestimate the effect sizes of psychological treatments, compared to trials using CAU control conditions. This overestimation is probably caused by a smaller improvement within the WL condition compared to the improvement in the CAU condition. WL control conditions should be avoided in randomized trials examining psychological treatments of adult depression.
{"title":"The overestimation of the effect sizes of psychotherapies for depression in waitlist controlled trials: a meta-analytic comparison with usual care controlled trials.","authors":"Pim Cuijpers, Clara Miguel, Mathias Harrer, Marketa Ciharova, Eirini Karyotaki","doi":"10.1017/S2045796024000611","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S2045796024000611","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>There is considerable evidence that waiting list (WL) control groups overestimate the effect sizes of psychotherapies for depression. It is not clear, however, what are the exact causes for this overestimation. We decided to conduct a meta-analytic study to compare trials on psychotherapy for depression with a WL control group against trials with a care-as-usual (CAU) control group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used an existing meta-analytic database of randomized trials comparing psychological treatments of adult depression with control groups and selected trials using a WL or a CAU control group. We used subgroup and meta-regression analyses to examine differences in effect sizes between WL and CAU controlled trials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 333 randomized controlled trials (472 comparisons; total number participants: 41,480), 141 with a WL and 195 with a CAU control group (3 included both). We found several significant differences between WL and CAU controlled trials (in type of therapy examined, treatment format, recency, target group, recruitment strategy, number of treatment arms and number of depression outcome measures). The overall effect size indicating the difference between treatment and control at post-test for all comparisons was <i>g</i> = 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.71; 0.84) with high heterogeneity (<i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 84; 95% CI: 82; 85). A highly significant difference was observed between studies with a CAU control group (<i>g</i> = 0.63; 95% CI: 0.55; 0.71; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 85; 95% CI: 83; 86) and studies with a WL (<i>g</i> = 0.95; 95% CI: 0.85; 1.04; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 80; 95% CI: 78; 82; <i>p</i> for difference < 0.001). This difference remained significant in all sensitivity analyses, including a meta-regression analysis in which we adjusted for all differences in characteristics of studies with a WL versus CAU control group. We also found that pre-post effect sizes in WL control conditions (<i>g</i> = 0.37; 95% CI: 0.28; 0.46) were significantly smaller than change within CAU conditions (<i>g</i> = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.50; 0.78). We found few indications that pre-post effect sizes within therapy conditions differed between WL and CAU controlled trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>WL control conditions considerably overestimate the effect sizes of psychological treatments, compared to trials using CAU control conditions. This overestimation is probably caused by a smaller improvement within the WL condition compared to the improvement in the CAU condition. WL control conditions should be avoided in randomized trials examining psychological treatments of adult depression.</p>","PeriodicalId":11787,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","volume":"33 ","pages":"e56"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11561681/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142581673","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-05DOI: 10.1017/S2045796024000696
G Kurt, M Ekhtiari, A de Graaff, M Ersahin, P Specker, M Sijbrandij, A Nickerson, C Acartürk
Aims: Forcibly displaced people, such as refugees and asylum-seekers (RAS), are at higher risk of mental disorders, mainly post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression and anxiety. Little is known about the complex relationships between these mental disorders among culturally and linguistically diverse RAS. To investigate this, the present study applied a novel network analytical approach to examine and compare the central and bridge symptoms within and between PTSD, depression and anxiety among Afghan and Syrian RAS in Türkiye.
Methods: A large-scale online survey study with 785 Afghan and 798 Syrian RAS in Türkiye was conducted in 2021. Symptoms of PTSD (the short form of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorders Checklist [PCL-5]), depression and anxiety (Hopkins Symptoms Checklist-25) [HSCL-25]) were measured via self-administrated validated instruments. We conducted network analysis to identify symptoms that are most strongly connected with other symptoms (central symptoms) and those that connect the symptoms of different disorders (bridge symptoms) in R Studio using the qgraph package.
Results: Overall, Afghans and Syrians differed in terms of network structure, but not in network strength. Results showed that feeling blue, feeling restless and spells of terror or panic were the most central symptoms maintaining the overall symptom structure of common mental disorders among Afghan participants. For Syrian participants, worrying too much, feeling blue and feeling tense were identified as the central symptoms. For both samples, anger and irritability and feeling low in energy acted as a bridge connecting the symptoms of PTSD, depression and anxiety.
Conclusion: The current findings provide insights into the interconnectedness within and between the symptoms of common mental disorders and highlight the key symptoms that can be potential targets for psychological interventions for RAS. Addressing these symptoms may aid in tailoring existing evidence-based interventions and enhance their effectiveness. This contributes to reducing the overall mental health burden and improving well-being in this population.
目的:难民和寻求庇护者(RAS)等被迫流离失所者患精神障碍的风险较高,主要是创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)、抑郁症和焦虑症。人们对不同文化和语言背景的难民和寻求庇护者中这些精神障碍之间的复杂关系知之甚少。为了探讨这一问题,本研究采用了一种新颖的网络分析方法,对土耳其境内阿富汗和叙利亚难民中创伤后应激障碍、抑郁症和焦虑症内部和之间的中心症状和桥接症状进行了研究和比较:2021 年,对土耳其的 785 名阿富汗难民和 798 名叙利亚难民进行了大规模在线调查研究。创伤后应激障碍症状(创伤后应激障碍核对表简表 [PCL-5])、抑郁和焦虑症状(霍普金斯症状核对表-25) [HSCL-25])通过自我管理的有效工具进行测量。我们在 R Studio 中使用 qgraph 软件包进行了网络分析,以确定与其他症状联系最紧密的症状(中心症状)和连接不同疾病症状的症状(桥接症状):总体而言,阿富汗人和叙利亚人在网络结构方面存在差异,但在网络强度方面没有差异。结果显示,在阿富汗参与者中,忧郁、焦躁不安和恐怖或恐慌是维持常见精神障碍整体症状结构的最主要症状。叙利亚参与者的主要症状是过度担心、忧郁和紧张。对于这两个样本来说,愤怒、易怒和精力不足是连接创伤后应激障碍、抑郁和焦虑症状的桥梁:目前的研究结果让我们深入了解了常见精神障碍症状内部和症状之间的相互联系,并强调了可作为 RAS 心理干预潜在目标的关键症状。解决这些症状可能有助于调整现有的循证干预措施并提高其有效性。这将有助于减轻该人群的整体心理健康负担并改善其福祉。
{"title":"Network analytical investigation of relationships between symptoms of common mental disorders among refugees and asylum seekers in Türkiye.","authors":"G Kurt, M Ekhtiari, A de Graaff, M Ersahin, P Specker, M Sijbrandij, A Nickerson, C Acartürk","doi":"10.1017/S2045796024000696","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S2045796024000696","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Forcibly displaced people, such as refugees and asylum-seekers (RAS), are at higher risk of mental disorders, mainly post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression and anxiety. Little is known about the complex relationships between these mental disorders among culturally and linguistically diverse RAS. To investigate this, the present study applied a novel network analytical approach to examine and compare the central and bridge symptoms within and between PTSD, depression and anxiety among Afghan and Syrian RAS in Türkiye.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A large-scale online survey study with 785 Afghan and 798 Syrian RAS in Türkiye was conducted in 2021. Symptoms of PTSD (the short form of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorders Checklist [PCL-5]), depression and anxiety (Hopkins Symptoms Checklist-25) [HSCL-25]) were measured via self-administrated validated instruments. We conducted network analysis to identify symptoms that are most strongly connected with other symptoms (central symptoms) and those that connect the symptoms of different disorders (bridge symptoms) in R Studio using the qgraph package.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, Afghans and Syrians differed in terms of network structure, but not in network strength. Results showed that feeling blue, feeling restless and spells of terror or panic were the most central symptoms maintaining the overall symptom structure of common mental disorders among Afghan participants. For Syrian participants, worrying too much, feeling blue and feeling tense were identified as the central symptoms. For both samples, anger and irritability and feeling low in energy acted as a bridge connecting the symptoms of PTSD, depression and anxiety.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current findings provide insights into the interconnectedness within and between the symptoms of common mental disorders and highlight the key symptoms that can be potential targets for psychological interventions for RAS. Addressing these symptoms may aid in tailoring existing evidence-based interventions and enhance their effectiveness. This contributes to reducing the overall mental health burden and improving well-being in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":11787,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","volume":"33 ","pages":"e59"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11561678/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142575811","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-05DOI: 10.1017/S2045796024000374
Chen Liang, Hsin-Fang Chung, Annette J Dobson, Gita D Mishra
Aims: The role of depression in subsequent infertility, miscarriage and stillbirth remains unclear. This study aimed to examine the association of a history of depression with these adverse outcomes using a longitudinal cohort study of women across their reproductive life span.
Methods: This study used data from participants in the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health who were born in 1973-1978. Participants (N = 8707) were followed up every 3 years from 2000 (aged 22-27) to 2018 (aged 40-45). Information on a diagnosis of depression was collected from each survey, and antidepressant medication use was identified through pharmaceutical prescription data. Histories of infertility, miscarriage, and stillbirth were self-reported at each survey. Time-lagged log-binomial models with generalized estimating equations were used to assess the association of a history of depression up to and including in a given survey with the risk of fertility issues in the next survey.
Results: Women with a history of depression (excluding postnatal depression) were at higher risk of infertility [risk ratio (RR) = 1.34, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.21-1.48], miscarriage (RR = 1.22, 95%CI: 1.10-1.34) and recurrent miscarriages (≥2; RR = 1.39, 95%CI: 1.17-1.64), compared to women without a history of depression. There were too few stillbirths to provide clear evidence of an association. Antidepressant medication use did not affect the observed associations. Estimated RRs of depression with infertility and miscarriage increased with age.
Conclusions: A history of depression was associated with higher risk of subsequent infertility, miscarriage and recurrent miscarriages.
目的:抑郁症在随后的不孕、流产和死胎中的作用仍不清楚。本研究旨在通过对生育期妇女进行纵向队列研究,探讨抑郁症病史与这些不良后果之间的关系:本研究使用了澳大利亚妇女健康纵向研究(Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health)中 1973-1978 年出生的参与者的数据。从 2000 年(22-27 岁)到 2018 年(40-45 岁),每 3 年对参与者(N = 8707)进行一次随访。每次调查都收集了有关抑郁症诊断的信息,并通过药品处方数据确定了抗抑郁药物的使用情况。不孕、流产和死胎史是在每次调查中自我报告的。采用时间滞后对数二项式模型和广义估计方程来评估在某次调查之前(包括该次调查)有抑郁症病史与下一次调查中生育问题风险之间的关联:与无抑郁症病史的妇女相比,有抑郁症病史(不包括产后抑郁症)的妇女患不孕症[风险比(RR)=1.34,95%置信区间(CI):1.21-1.48]、流产(RR=1.22,95%CI:1.10-1.34)和复发性流产(≥2;RR=1.39,95%CI:1.17-1.64)的风险较高。死胎数量太少,无法提供明确的关联证据。使用抗抑郁药物不会影响观察到的关联。抑郁症与不孕和流产的估计RR随着年龄的增长而增加:结论:抑郁症病史与较高的不孕、流产和复发性流产风险有关。
{"title":"Association of a history of depression with infertility, miscarriage and stillbirth: a longitudinal cohort study.","authors":"Chen Liang, Hsin-Fang Chung, Annette J Dobson, Gita D Mishra","doi":"10.1017/S2045796024000374","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S2045796024000374","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The role of depression in subsequent infertility, miscarriage and stillbirth remains unclear. This study aimed to examine the association of a history of depression with these adverse outcomes using a longitudinal cohort study of women across their reproductive life span.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used data from participants in the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health who were born in 1973-1978. Participants (<i>N</i> = 8707) were followed up every 3 years from 2000 (aged 22-27) to 2018 (aged 40-45). Information on a diagnosis of depression was collected from each survey, and antidepressant medication use was identified through pharmaceutical prescription data. Histories of infertility, miscarriage, and stillbirth were self-reported at each survey. Time-lagged log-binomial models with generalized estimating equations were used to assess the association of a history of depression up to and including in a given survey with the risk of fertility issues in the next survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Women with a history of depression (excluding postnatal depression) were at higher risk of infertility [risk ratio (RR) = 1.34, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.21-1.48], miscarriage (RR = 1.22, 95%CI: 1.10-1.34) and recurrent miscarriages (≥2; RR = 1.39, 95%CI: 1.17-1.64), compared to women without a history of depression. There were too few stillbirths to provide clear evidence of an association. Antidepressant medication use did not affect the observed associations. Estimated RRs of depression with infertility and miscarriage increased with age.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A history of depression was associated with higher risk of subsequent infertility, miscarriage and recurrent miscarriages.</p>","PeriodicalId":11787,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","volume":"33 ","pages":"e55"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11561523/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142575810","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-05DOI: 10.1017/S2045796024000660
F Blangis, L Arseneault, A Caspi, R M Latham, T E Moffitt, H L Fisher
<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Exposure to multiple forms of victimisation in childhood (often referred to as poly-victimisation) has lifelong adverse effects, including an elevated risk of early-adulthood psychopathology. However, not all poly-victimised children develop mental health difficulties and identifying what protects them could inform preventive interventions. The present study investigated whether individual-, family- and/or community-level factors were associated with lower levels of general psychopathology at age 18, among children exposed to poly-victimisation. Additionally, it examined whether these factors were specific to poly-victimised children or also associated with fewer mental health difficulties in young adults regardless of whether they had been poly-victimised.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from the Environmental Risk (E-Risk) Longitudinal Twin Study, a population-representative cohort of 2,232 children born in 1994-1995 across England and Wales and followed to 18 years of age (with 93% retention, n = 2,066). Poly-victimisation (i.e., exposure to two or more of physical abuse, sexual abuse, emotional abuse and neglect, physical neglect, bullying by peers, and domestic violence) and nine putative protective factors (intelligence quotient, executive functioning, temperament, maternal and sibling warmth, atmosphere at home, maternal monitoring, neighbourhood social cohesion, and presence of a supportive adult) were measured prospectively between ages 5 and 12 years from interviews with mothers and children, surveys of neighbours, child-protection referrals, and researchers' observations. Early-adulthood psychopathology was assessed in interviews with each twin at age 18 and used to construct a latent factor of general psychopathology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately a third (n = 720) of participants were prospectively defined as exposed to poly-victimisation (53% male). Poly-victimised children had greater levels of general psychopathology at age 18 than non-poly-victimised children (adjusted [adj.] β = 4.80; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 3.13, 6.47). Presence of a supportive adult was the only factor robustly associated with lower levels of general psychopathology among poly-victimised children (adj.β = -0.61; 95% CI -0.99, -0.23). However, this association was also evident in the whole sample regardless of poly-victimisation exposure (adj.β = -0.52; 95% CI -0.81, -0.24) and no significant interaction was observed between the presence of a supportive adult and poly-victimisation in relation to age-18 general psychopathology.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Having at least one adult to turn to for support was found to be associated with less psychopathology in early adulthood among both poly-victimised and non-poly-victimised children. This suggests that strategies to promote better availability and utilisation of supportive adults should be implemented universally. However, it may be benefic
{"title":"Testing whether multi-level factors protect poly-victimised children against psychopathology in early adulthood: a longitudinal cohort study.","authors":"F Blangis, L Arseneault, A Caspi, R M Latham, T E Moffitt, H L Fisher","doi":"10.1017/S2045796024000660","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S2045796024000660","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Exposure to multiple forms of victimisation in childhood (often referred to as poly-victimisation) has lifelong adverse effects, including an elevated risk of early-adulthood psychopathology. However, not all poly-victimised children develop mental health difficulties and identifying what protects them could inform preventive interventions. The present study investigated whether individual-, family- and/or community-level factors were associated with lower levels of general psychopathology at age 18, among children exposed to poly-victimisation. Additionally, it examined whether these factors were specific to poly-victimised children or also associated with fewer mental health difficulties in young adults regardless of whether they had been poly-victimised.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from the Environmental Risk (E-Risk) Longitudinal Twin Study, a population-representative cohort of 2,232 children born in 1994-1995 across England and Wales and followed to 18 years of age (with 93% retention, n = 2,066). Poly-victimisation (i.e., exposure to two or more of physical abuse, sexual abuse, emotional abuse and neglect, physical neglect, bullying by peers, and domestic violence) and nine putative protective factors (intelligence quotient, executive functioning, temperament, maternal and sibling warmth, atmosphere at home, maternal monitoring, neighbourhood social cohesion, and presence of a supportive adult) were measured prospectively between ages 5 and 12 years from interviews with mothers and children, surveys of neighbours, child-protection referrals, and researchers' observations. Early-adulthood psychopathology was assessed in interviews with each twin at age 18 and used to construct a latent factor of general psychopathology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately a third (n = 720) of participants were prospectively defined as exposed to poly-victimisation (53% male). Poly-victimised children had greater levels of general psychopathology at age 18 than non-poly-victimised children (adjusted [adj.] β = 4.80; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 3.13, 6.47). Presence of a supportive adult was the only factor robustly associated with lower levels of general psychopathology among poly-victimised children (adj.β = -0.61; 95% CI -0.99, -0.23). However, this association was also evident in the whole sample regardless of poly-victimisation exposure (adj.β = -0.52; 95% CI -0.81, -0.24) and no significant interaction was observed between the presence of a supportive adult and poly-victimisation in relation to age-18 general psychopathology.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Having at least one adult to turn to for support was found to be associated with less psychopathology in early adulthood among both poly-victimised and non-poly-victimised children. This suggests that strategies to promote better availability and utilisation of supportive adults should be implemented universally. However, it may be benefic","PeriodicalId":11787,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","volume":"33 ","pages":"e58"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11561683/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142575812","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-04DOI: 10.1017/S2045796024000635
Cheng-Fang Yen, Ching-Shu Tsai, Yu-Ping Chang, Peng-Wei Wang
Aims: The aim of this 4-year follow-up study was to examine the predictive effects of demographics, three types of sexual stigma, three types of self-identity confusion, anxiety, depression, family support and problematic Internet use before the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on new-onset suicide risk and persistent suicide risk in young adult lesbian, gay and bisexual individuals who experienced the COVID-19 pandemic in Taiwan.
Methods: Baseline data were collected from 1,000 lesbian, gay and bisexual individuals in 2018 and 2019. Outcome data on suicide risk were collected again in 2023. The suicide module of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview was used to assess suicide risk in terms of thoughts of death, desire to self-harm, thoughts of suicide, plans for suicide and suicide attempts in the preceding month at the initial and follow-up assessments. Baseline three types of sexual stigma, self-identity disturbance, depression, anxiety and problematic Internet use were used to examine their prediction of new-onset suicide risk and persistent suicide risk at follow-up.
Results: In total, 673 individuals participated in the follow-up survey. Notably, 16.5% of the participants who had no suicide risk at baseline had new-onset suicide risk at follow-up; 46.4% of the participants who had suicide risk at baseline also had suicide risk at follow-up. Participants who were transgender (p = .003), who perceived greater levels of microaggression (p < .001), and who had greater levels of problematic Internet use at baseline (p = .024) were more likely to have new-onset suicide risk at follow-up. Participants who had greater levels of self-identity confusion were more likely to have persistent suicide risk at follow-up (p = .023).
Conclusion: Intervention strategies for reducing suicide risk in lesbian, gay and bisexual individuals should be developed with consideration of the predictors identified in this study.
{"title":"Predictors of new-onset suicide risk and persistent suicide risk among young adult lesbian, gay and bisexual individuals experiencing the COVID-19 pandemic: a follow-up study.","authors":"Cheng-Fang Yen, Ching-Shu Tsai, Yu-Ping Chang, Peng-Wei Wang","doi":"10.1017/S2045796024000635","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S2045796024000635","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this 4-year follow-up study was to examine the predictive effects of demographics, three types of sexual stigma, three types of self-identity confusion, anxiety, depression, family support and problematic Internet use before the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on new-onset suicide risk and persistent suicide risk in young adult lesbian, gay and bisexual individuals who experienced the COVID-19 pandemic in Taiwan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Baseline data were collected from 1,000 lesbian, gay and bisexual individuals in 2018 and 2019. Outcome data on suicide risk were collected again in 2023. The suicide module of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview was used to assess suicide risk in terms of thoughts of death, desire to self-harm, thoughts of suicide, plans for suicide and suicide attempts in the preceding month at the initial and follow-up assessments. Baseline three types of sexual stigma, self-identity disturbance, depression, anxiety and problematic Internet use were used to examine their prediction of new-onset suicide risk and persistent suicide risk at follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 673 individuals participated in the follow-up survey. Notably, 16.5% of the participants who had no suicide risk at baseline had new-onset suicide risk at follow-up; 46.4% of the participants who had suicide risk at baseline also had suicide risk at follow-up. Participants who were transgender (<i>p</i> = .003), who perceived greater levels of microaggression (<i>p</i> < .001), and who had greater levels of problematic Internet use at baseline (<i>p</i> = .024) were more likely to have new-onset suicide risk at follow-up. Participants who had greater levels of self-identity confusion were more likely to have persistent suicide risk at follow-up (<i>p</i> = .023).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intervention strategies for reducing suicide risk in lesbian, gay and bisexual individuals should be developed with consideration of the predictors identified in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":11787,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","volume":"33 ","pages":"e57"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11561679/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142567296","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}