Pub Date : 2025-03-13DOI: 10.1017/S2045796025000150
Hilary K Brown, Kinwah Fung, Andrea Mataruga, Rachel Strauss, Vincy Chan, Natalie Urbach, Tatyana Mollayeva, Angela Colantonio, Eyal Cohen, Cindy-Lee Dennis, Joel G Ray, Natasha R Saunders, Simone N Vigod
Aims: To examine the risk of perinatal mental illness, including new diagnoses and recurrent use of mental healthcare, comparing women with and without traumatic brain injury (TBI), and to identify injury-related factors associated with these outcomes among women with TBI.
Methods: We conducted a population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada, of all obstetrical deliveries to women in 2012-2021, excluding those with mental healthcare use in the year before conception. The cohort was stratified into women with no remote mental illness history (to identify new mental illness diagnoses between conception and 365 days postpartum) and those with a remote mental illness history (to identify recurrent illnesses). Modified Poisson regression generated adjusted relative risks (aRRs) (1) comparing women with and without TBI and (2) according to injury-related variables (i.e., number, severity, timing, mechanism and intent) among women with TBI.
Results: There were n = 12,724 women with a history of TBI (mean age: 27.6 years [SD, 5.5]) and n = 786,317 without a history of TBI (mean age: 30.6 years [SD, 5.0]). Women with TBI were at elevated risk of a new mental illness diagnosis in the perinatal period compared to women without TBI (18.5% vs. 12.7%; aRR: 1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.24-1.39), including mood and anxiety disorders. Women with a TBI were also at elevated risk for recurrent use of mental healthcare perinatally (35.5% vs. 27.8%; aRR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.14-1.22), including mood and anxiety, psychotic, substance use and other mental health disorders. Among women with a history of TBI, the number of TBI-related healthcare encounters was positively associated with an elevated risk of new-onset mental illness.
Conclusions: These findings demonstrate the need for providers to be attentive to the risk for perinatal mental illness in women with a TBI. This population may benefit from screening and tailored mental health supports and treatment options.
{"title":"A population-based cohort study of perinatal mental illness following traumatic brain injury.","authors":"Hilary K Brown, Kinwah Fung, Andrea Mataruga, Rachel Strauss, Vincy Chan, Natalie Urbach, Tatyana Mollayeva, Angela Colantonio, Eyal Cohen, Cindy-Lee Dennis, Joel G Ray, Natasha R Saunders, Simone N Vigod","doi":"10.1017/S2045796025000150","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S2045796025000150","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To examine the risk of perinatal mental illness, including new diagnoses and recurrent use of mental healthcare, comparing women with and without traumatic brain injury (TBI), and to identify injury-related factors associated with these outcomes among women with TBI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada, of all obstetrical deliveries to women in 2012-2021, excluding those with mental healthcare use in the year before conception. The cohort was stratified into women with no remote mental illness history (to identify new mental illness diagnoses between conception and 365 days postpartum) and those with a remote mental illness history (to identify recurrent illnesses). Modified Poisson regression generated adjusted relative risks (aRRs) (1) comparing women with and without TBI and (2) according to injury-related variables (i.e., number, severity, timing, mechanism and intent) among women with TBI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were <i>n</i> = 12,724 women with a history of TBI (mean age: 27.6 years [SD, 5.5]) and <i>n</i> = 786,317 without a history of TBI (mean age: 30.6 years [SD, 5.0]). Women with TBI were at elevated risk of a new mental illness diagnosis in the perinatal period compared to women without TBI (18.5% vs. 12.7%; aRR: 1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.24-1.39), including mood and anxiety disorders. Women with a TBI were also at elevated risk for recurrent use of mental healthcare perinatally (35.5% vs. 27.8%; aRR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.14-1.22), including mood and anxiety, psychotic, substance use and other mental health disorders. Among women with a history of TBI, the number of TBI-related healthcare encounters was positively associated with an elevated risk of new-onset mental illness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings demonstrate the need for providers to be attentive to the risk for perinatal mental illness in women with a TBI. This population may benefit from screening and tailored mental health supports and treatment options.</p>","PeriodicalId":11787,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","volume":"34 ","pages":"e19"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11955423/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143613906","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-12DOI: 10.1017/S2045796025000137
J M Armitage, E Viegas da Silva, F Tseliou, L Riglin, G Hammerton, S Collishaw, I S Santos, L Tovo-Rodrigues, A M B Menezes, C F Wehrmeister, H Gonçalves, A Matijasevich, J Murray
Aims: Epidemiological evidence shows a concerning rise in youth mental health difficulties over the past three decades. Most evidence, however, comes from countries in Europe or North America, with far less known about changes in other global regions. This study aimed to compare adolescent mental health across two population-based cohorts in the UK, and two population-based cohorts in Pelotas, Brazil.
Methods: Four population-based cohorts with identical mental health measures were compared. In Brazil, these included the 1993 Pelotas Birth Cohort and the 2004 Pelotas Birth Cohort. In the UK, cohorts included the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children, and the Millennium Cohort Study. Mental health was measured in all cohorts using identical, parent-rated scores from the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). This was assessed in both countries over approximately the same time periods, when adolescents were aged 11 (2004 vs 2015 in Brazil, and 2003 vs 2012 in the UK), with follow-up analyses focused on outcomes in later adolescence.
Results: Mental health problems were higher in the UK for adolescents born in the early 2000s compared to those born in the early 1990s. In Pelotas, the opposite was found, whereby problems were lower for adolescents born in the early 2000s compared to those born in the early 1990s. Despite these promising reductions in mental health problems in Pelotas over time, SDQ scores remained higher in Pelotas compared to the UK.
Conclusions: Our study represents the first to compare two population-based cohorts in the UK, and two population-based cohorts in Pelotas, Brazil, to understand how mental health problems have changed over time across the two settings. Our findings provide the most up-to-date insight into population-level rates of youth mental health problems in Pelotas, and shed novel insight into how these have changed over the last two decades in comparison to the UK. In doing so, our study provides a tentative first step towards understanding youth mental health over time at a more global scale, and presents a valuable opportunity to examine putative contributors to differences across time.
{"title":"A cross-country comparison of temporal change in adolescent mental health problems in the UK and Brazil.","authors":"J M Armitage, E Viegas da Silva, F Tseliou, L Riglin, G Hammerton, S Collishaw, I S Santos, L Tovo-Rodrigues, A M B Menezes, C F Wehrmeister, H Gonçalves, A Matijasevich, J Murray","doi":"10.1017/S2045796025000137","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S2045796025000137","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Epidemiological evidence shows a concerning rise in youth mental health difficulties over the past three decades. Most evidence, however, comes from countries in Europe or North America, with far less known about changes in other global regions. This study aimed to compare adolescent mental health across two population-based cohorts in the UK, and two population-based cohorts in Pelotas, Brazil.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four population-based cohorts with identical mental health measures were compared. In Brazil, these included the 1993 Pelotas Birth Cohort and the 2004 Pelotas Birth Cohort. In the UK, cohorts included the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children, and the Millennium Cohort Study. Mental health was measured in all cohorts using identical, parent-rated scores from the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). This was assessed in both countries over approximately the same time periods, when adolescents were aged 11 (2004 vs 2015 in Brazil, and 2003 vs 2012 in the UK), with follow-up analyses focused on outcomes in later adolescence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mental health problems were higher in the UK for adolescents born in the early 2000s compared to those born in the early 1990s. In Pelotas, the opposite was found, whereby problems were lower for adolescents born in the early 2000s compared to those born in the early 1990s. Despite these promising reductions in mental health problems in Pelotas over time, SDQ scores remained higher in Pelotas compared to the UK.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study represents the first to compare two population-based cohorts in the UK, and two population-based cohorts in Pelotas, Brazil, to understand how mental health problems have changed over time across the two settings. Our findings provide the most up-to-date insight into population-level rates of youth mental health problems in Pelotas, and shed novel insight into how these have changed over the last two decades in comparison to the UK. In doing so, our study provides a tentative first step towards understanding youth mental health over time at a more global scale, and presents a valuable opportunity to examine putative contributors to differences across time.</p>","PeriodicalId":11787,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","volume":"34 ","pages":"e17"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11955427/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143604485","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-07DOI: 10.1017/S2045796025000083
Dimity Crisp, Debra Rickwood, Richard Burns, Emily Bariola
Aims: The high level of psychological distress in young people is a growing concern. However, there are few national surveys that describe the trajectories of mental health and wellbeing through adolescence into early adulthood. Further, existing research has largely focused exclusively on mental ill-health, with little focus on positive mental health. This study provides the first national profile of the mental health and wellbeing of Australians aged 12-25 years.
Methods: Participants completed the National Youth Mental Health survey in 2018 (n1 = 3832), 2020 (n2 = 974) or 2022 (n3 = 961). We applied Keyes' Complete Mental Health (CMH) framework to derive categories of mental health and wellbeing, and examine rates of CMH over time, by age and gender.
Results: While approximately half of those surveyed reported flourishing (high wellbeing without mental illness), rates of flourishing declined between 2018 and 2022. Rates of flourishing generally decreased with age, and flourishing was more prevalent amongst males than females.
Conclusions: The findings provide a unique contrast of youth mental health pre-, during and post- the COVID-19 pandemic. While rates of psychological distress are consistently high, the proportion of youth reporting flourishing highlights the need to consider all aspects of psychological functioning to accurately understand and respond to the mental health needs of young people.
{"title":"The complete mental health of Australia's adolescents and emerging adults: distress and wellbeing across 3 nationally representative community samples.","authors":"Dimity Crisp, Debra Rickwood, Richard Burns, Emily Bariola","doi":"10.1017/S2045796025000083","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S2045796025000083","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The high level of psychological distress in young people is a growing concern. However, there are few national surveys that describe the trajectories of mental health and wellbeing through adolescence into early adulthood. Further, existing research has largely focused exclusively on mental ill-health, with little focus on positive mental health. This study provides the first national profile of the mental health and wellbeing of Australians aged 12-25 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants completed the National Youth Mental Health survey in 2018 (n<sub>1</sub> = 3832), 2020 (n<sub>2</sub> = 974) or 2022 (n<sub>3</sub> = 961). We applied Keyes' Complete Mental Health (CMH) framework to derive categories of mental health and wellbeing, and examine rates of CMH over time, by age and gender.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While approximately half of those surveyed reported flourishing (high wellbeing without mental illness), rates of flourishing declined between 2018 and 2022. Rates of flourishing generally decreased with age, and flourishing was more prevalent amongst males than females.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings provide a unique contrast of youth mental health pre-, during and post- the COVID-19 pandemic. While rates of psychological distress are consistently high, the proportion of youth reporting flourishing highlights the need to consider all aspects of psychological functioning to accurately understand and respond to the mental health needs of young people.</p>","PeriodicalId":11787,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","volume":"34 ","pages":"e16"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11886970/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143572544","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-06DOI: 10.1017/S2045796025000095
Clara Miguel, Mathias Harrer, Eirini Karyotaki, Constantin Yves Plessen, Marketa Ciharova, Toshi A Furukawa, Ioana A Cristea, Pim Cuijpers
Aims: The comparability between self-reports and clinician-rated scales for measuring depression following treatment has been a long-standing debate, with studies finding mixed results. While the use of self-reports in psychotherapy trials is very common, it has been widely assumed that these tools pose a validity threat when masking of participants is not possible. We conducted a meta-analysis across randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of psychotherapy for depression to examine if treatment effect estimates obtained via self-reports differ from clinician-rated outcomes.
Methods: We identified studies from a living database of psychotherapies for depression (updated to 1 January 2023). We included RCTs measuring depression at post-treatment with both a self-report and a clinician-rated scale. As our main model, we ran a multilevel hierarchical meta-analysis, resulting in a pooled differential effect size (Δg) between self-reports and clinician ratings. Moderators of this difference were explored through multimodel inference analyses.
Results: A total of 91 trials (283 effect sizes) were included. In our main model, we found that self-reports produced smaller effect size estimates compared to clinician-rated instruments (Δg= 0.12; 95% CI: 0.03-0.21). This difference was very similar when only including trials with masked clinicians (Δg= 0.10; 95% CI: 0.00-0.20). However, it was more pronounced for unmasked clinical ratings (Δg= 0.20; 95% CI: -0.03 to 0.43) and when trials targeted specific population groups (e.g., perinatal depression) (Δg= 0.20; 95% CI: 0.08-0.32). Effect sizes between self-reports and clinicians were identical in trials targeting general adults (Δg= 0.00; 95% CI: -0.14 to 0.14).
Conclusions: Self-report instruments did not overestimate the effects of psychotherapy for depression and were generally more conservative than clinician assessments. Patients' perception of improvement should not be considered less valid by default, despite the inherent challenge of masking in psychotherapy.
{"title":"Self-reports vs clinician ratings of efficacies of psychotherapies for depression: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.","authors":"Clara Miguel, Mathias Harrer, Eirini Karyotaki, Constantin Yves Plessen, Marketa Ciharova, Toshi A Furukawa, Ioana A Cristea, Pim Cuijpers","doi":"10.1017/S2045796025000095","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S2045796025000095","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The comparability between self-reports and clinician-rated scales for measuring depression following treatment has been a long-standing debate, with studies finding mixed results. While the use of self-reports in psychotherapy trials is very common, it has been widely assumed that these tools pose a validity threat when masking of participants is not possible. We conducted a meta-analysis across randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of psychotherapy for depression to examine if treatment effect estimates obtained via self-reports differ from clinician-rated outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified studies from a living database of psychotherapies for depression (updated to 1 January 2023). We included RCTs measuring depression at post-treatment with both a self-report and a clinician-rated scale. As our main model, we ran a multilevel hierarchical meta-analysis, resulting in a pooled differential effect size (Δ<i>g</i>) between self-reports and clinician ratings. Moderators of this difference were explored through multimodel inference analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 91 trials (283 effect sizes) were included. In our main model, we found that self-reports produced smaller effect size estimates compared to clinician-rated instruments (Δ<i>g</i><i>=</i> 0.12; 95% CI: 0.03-0.21). This difference was very similar when only including trials with masked clinicians (Δ<i>g</i><i>=</i> 0.10; 95% CI: 0.00-0.20). However, it was more pronounced for unmasked clinical ratings (Δ<i>g</i><i>=</i> 0.20; 95% CI: -0.03 to 0.43) and when trials targeted specific population groups (e.g., perinatal depression) (Δ<i>g</i><i>=</i> 0.20; 95% CI: 0.08-0.32). Effect sizes between self-reports and clinicians were identical in trials targeting general adults (Δ<i>g</i><i>=</i> 0.00; 95% CI: -0.14 to 0.14).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Self-report instruments did not overestimate the effects of psychotherapy for depression and were generally more conservative than clinician assessments. Patients' perception of improvement should not be considered less valid by default, despite the inherent challenge of masking in psychotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11787,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","volume":"34 ","pages":"e15"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11886967/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143565941","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Aims: Increasing evidence has established a strong association between social anxiety disorder and suicidal behaviours, including suicidal ideation and suicide attempts. However, the association between social anxiety disorder and suicide mortality remains unclear.
Methods: This study analysed data from 15,776 patients with social anxiety disorder, extracted from a nationwide Taiwanese cohort between 2003 and 2017. Two unexposed groups without social anxiety disorder, matched by birth year and sex in 1:4 and 1:10 ratios, respectively, were used for comparison. Suicide deaths during the same period were examined. Psychiatric comorbidities commonly associated with social anxiety disorder, including schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depression, alcohol use disorder (AUD), substance use disorder (SUD), obsessive-compulsive disorder, autism, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, were identified.
Results: Time-dependent Cox regression models, adjusted for demographic factors and psychiatric comorbidities, revealed that individuals with social anxiety disorder had an increased risk of suicide (hazard ratio: 3.49 in the 1:4 matched analysis and 2.84 in the 1:10 matched analysis) compared with those without the disorder. Comorbidities such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depression, AUD, and SUD further increased the risk of suicide in patients with social anxiety disorder.
Conclusion: Social anxiety disorder is an independent risk factor for suicide death. Additional psychiatric comorbidities, including schizophrenia, major affective disorders, and AUD, further increased social anxiety disorder-related suicide risk. Therefore, mental health officers and clinicians should develop targeted suicide prevention strategies for individuals with social anxiety disorder.
{"title":"Increased risk of suicide among patients with social anxiety disorder.","authors":"Han-Ting Wei, Shih-Jen Tsai, Chih-Ming Cheng, Wen-Han Chang, Ya-Mei Bai, Tung-Ping Su, Tzeng-Ji Chen, Mu-Hong Chen","doi":"10.1017/S204579602500006X","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S204579602500006X","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Increasing evidence has established a strong association between social anxiety disorder and suicidal behaviours, including suicidal ideation and suicide attempts. However, the association between social anxiety disorder and suicide mortality remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study analysed data from 15,776 patients with social anxiety disorder, extracted from a nationwide Taiwanese cohort between 2003 and 2017. Two unexposed groups without social anxiety disorder, matched by birth year and sex in 1:4 and 1:10 ratios, respectively, were used for comparison. Suicide deaths during the same period were examined. Psychiatric comorbidities commonly associated with social anxiety disorder, including schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depression, alcohol use disorder (AUD), substance use disorder (SUD), obsessive-compulsive disorder, autism, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, were identified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Time-dependent Cox regression models, adjusted for demographic factors and psychiatric comorbidities, revealed that individuals with social anxiety disorder had an increased risk of suicide (hazard ratio: 3.49 in the 1:4 matched analysis and 2.84 in the 1:10 matched analysis) compared with those without the disorder. Comorbidities such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depression, AUD, and SUD further increased the risk of suicide in patients with social anxiety disorder.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Social anxiety disorder is an independent risk factor for suicide death. Additional psychiatric comorbidities, including schizophrenia, major affective disorders, and AUD, further increased social anxiety disorder-related suicide risk. Therefore, mental health officers and clinicians should develop targeted suicide prevention strategies for individuals with social anxiety disorder.</p>","PeriodicalId":11787,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","volume":"34 ","pages":"e14"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11886972/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143491284","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-21DOI: 10.1017/S2045796025000071
Davide Papola, Vikram Patel
{"title":"Towards person-centered care in global mental health: implications for meta-analyses and clinical trials.","authors":"Davide Papola, Vikram Patel","doi":"10.1017/S2045796025000071","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S2045796025000071","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11787,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","volume":"34 ","pages":"e13"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11886971/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143467130","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-20DOI: 10.1017/S2045796025000058
S Kisely, C Bull, N Gill
Aims: There has been concern about violent acts and other criminal behaviour by people with a possible history of mental health problems. We therefore assessed the effects of community treatment orders (CTOs) on self-, third-party-, and agency-reported criminal behaviour when compared to voluntary treatment.
Methods: A systematic search of PubMed/Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and criminal justice bibliographic databases for observational or randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CTO cases with controls receiving voluntary psychiatric treatment. Relevant outcomes were reports of violence and aggression or contacts with the criminal justice system such as arrests and court appearances.
Results: Thirteen papers from 11 studies met inclusion criteria. Nine papers came from the United States and four from Australia. Two papers were of RCTs. Results for all outcomes were non-significant, the effect size declining as study design improved from non-randomised data on self-reported criminal behaviour, through third party criminal justice records and finally to RCTs. Similarly, there was no significant finding in the subgroup analysis of serious criminal behaviour.
Conclusions: On the limited available evidence, CTOs may not address aggression or criminal behaviour in people with mental illness. This is possibly because the risk of violence is increased by comorbid or nonclinical variables, which are beyond the scope of CTOs. These include substance use, a history of victimisation or maltreatment, and the wider environment. The management of risk should therefore focus on the whole person and their community through social and public health interventions, not solely legislative control.
{"title":"A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of community treatment orders on aggression or criminal behaviour in people with a mental illness.","authors":"S Kisely, C Bull, N Gill","doi":"10.1017/S2045796025000058","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S2045796025000058","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>There has been concern about violent acts and other criminal behaviour by people with a possible history of mental health problems. We therefore assessed the effects of community treatment orders (CTOs) on self-, third-party-, and agency-reported criminal behaviour when compared to voluntary treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed/Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and criminal justice bibliographic databases for observational or randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CTO cases with controls receiving voluntary psychiatric treatment. Relevant outcomes were reports of violence and aggression or contacts with the criminal justice system such as arrests and court appearances.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen papers from 11 studies met inclusion criteria. Nine papers came from the United States and four from Australia. Two papers were of RCTs. Results for all outcomes were non-significant, the effect size declining as study design improved from non-randomised data on self-reported criminal behaviour, through third party criminal justice records and finally to RCTs. Similarly, there was no significant finding in the subgroup analysis of serious criminal behaviour.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>On the limited available evidence, CTOs may not address aggression or criminal behaviour in people with mental illness. This is possibly because the risk of violence is increased by comorbid or nonclinical variables, which are beyond the scope of CTOs. These include substance use, a history of victimisation or maltreatment, and the wider environment. The management of risk should therefore focus on the whole person and their community through social and public health interventions, not solely legislative control.</p>","PeriodicalId":11787,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","volume":"34 ","pages":"e12"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11886974/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143457344","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-19DOI: 10.1017/S2045796025000046
P Peng, Z M Chen, S L Ren, Y He, J G Li, A J Liao, L L Zhao, X Shao, S S Chen, R N He, Y D Liang, Y G Tan, X G Chen, Y H Liao, J S Tang
Aims: While the cross-sectional relationship between internet gaming disorder (IGD) and depression is well-established, whether IGD predicts future depression remains debated, and the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. This large-scale, three-wave longitudinal study aimed to clarify the predictive role of IGD in depression and explore the mediating effects of resilience and sleep distress.
Methods: A cohort of 41,215 middle school students from Zigong City was assessed at three time points: November 2021 (T1), November 2022 (T2) and November 2023 (T3). IGD, depression, sleep distress and resilience were measured using standardized questionnaires. Multiple logistic regression was used to examine the associations between baseline IGD and both concurrent and subsequent depression. Mediation analyses were conducted with T1 IGD as the predictor, T2 sleep distress and resilience as serial mediators and T3 depression as the outcome. To test the robustness of the findings, a series of sensitivity analyses were performed. Additionally, sex differences in the mediation pathways were explored.
Results: (1) IGD was independently associated with depression at baseline (T1: adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 4.76, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.79-5.98, p < 0.001), 1 year later (T2: AOR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.16-1.74, p < 0.001) and 2 years later (T3: AOR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.01-1.53, p = 0.042); (2) A serial multiple mediation effect of sleep distress and resilience was identified in the relationship between IGD and depression. The mediation ratio was 60.7% in the unadjusted model and 33.3% in the fully adjusted model, accounting for baseline depression, sleep distress, resilience and other covariates. The robustness of our findings was supported by various sensitivity analyses; and (3) Sex differences were observed in the mediating roles of sleep distress and resilience, with the mediation ratio being higher in boys compared to girls.
Conclusions: IGD is a significant predictor of depression in adolescents, with resilience and sleep distress serving as key mediators. Early identification and targeted interventions for IGD may help prevent depression. Intervention strategies should prioritize enhancing resilience and improving sleep quality, particularly among boys at risk.
目的:虽然网络游戏障碍(IGD)和抑郁症之间的横断面关系已经确立,但IGD是否能预测未来的抑郁症仍存在争议,其潜在机制尚未完全了解。这项大规模的三波纵向研究旨在阐明IGD在抑郁症中的预测作用,并探讨恢复力和睡眠困扰的中介作用。方法:在2021年11月(T1)、2022年11月(T2)和2023年11月(T3)三个时间点对自贡市41215名中学生进行队列研究。IGD、抑郁、睡眠困扰和恢复力采用标准化问卷进行测量。使用多元逻辑回归来检查基线IGD与并发和随后的抑郁之间的关系。以T1 IGD为预测因子,T2睡眠困扰和恢复力为系列中介因子,T3抑郁为结局因子进行中介分析。为了检验研究结果的稳健性,进行了一系列的敏感性分析。此外,性别差异的调解途径进行了探讨。结果:(1)基线时IGD与抑郁独立相关(T1:校正优势比[AOR] = 4.76, 95%可信区间[CI]: 3.79 ~ 5.98, p p p = 0.042);(2)在IGD与抑郁的关系中发现了睡眠困扰和心理弹性的一系列多重中介作用。未调整模型的中介率为60.7%,完全调整模型的中介率为33.3%,考虑了基线抑郁、睡眠困扰、恢复力等协变量。我们发现的稳健性得到了各种敏感性分析的支持;(3)睡眠困扰和心理弹性的中介作用存在性别差异,男孩的中介比例高于女孩。结论:IGD是青少年抑郁的重要预测因子,恢复力和睡眠困扰是关键的中介因子。IGD的早期识别和有针对性的干预可能有助于预防抑郁症。干预策略应优先考虑增强适应力和改善睡眠质量,特别是在有风险的男孩中。
{"title":"Internet gaming disorder and depression mediated by impaired resilience and sleep distress: a three-wave longitudinal study among Chinese adolescents.","authors":"P Peng, Z M Chen, S L Ren, Y He, J G Li, A J Liao, L L Zhao, X Shao, S S Chen, R N He, Y D Liang, Y G Tan, X G Chen, Y H Liao, J S Tang","doi":"10.1017/S2045796025000046","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S2045796025000046","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>While the cross-sectional relationship between internet gaming disorder (IGD) and depression is well-established, whether IGD predicts future depression remains debated, and the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. This large-scale, three-wave longitudinal study aimed to clarify the predictive role of IGD in depression and explore the mediating effects of resilience and sleep distress.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort of 41,215 middle school students from Zigong City was assessed at three time points: November 2021 (T1), November 2022 (T2) and November 2023 (T3). IGD, depression, sleep distress and resilience were measured using standardized questionnaires. Multiple logistic regression was used to examine the associations between baseline IGD and both concurrent and subsequent depression. Mediation analyses were conducted with T1 IGD as the predictor, T2 sleep distress and resilience as serial mediators and T3 depression as the outcome. To test the robustness of the findings, a series of sensitivity analyses were performed. Additionally, sex differences in the mediation pathways were explored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>(1) IGD was independently associated with depression at baseline (T1: adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 4.76, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.79-5.98, <i>p</i> < 0.001), 1 year later (T2: AOR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.16-1.74, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and 2 years later (T3: AOR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.01-1.53, <i>p</i> = 0.042); (2) A serial multiple mediation effect of sleep distress and resilience was identified in the relationship between IGD and depression. The mediation ratio was 60.7% in the unadjusted model and 33.3% in the fully adjusted model, accounting for baseline depression, sleep distress, resilience and other covariates. The robustness of our findings was supported by various sensitivity analyses; and (3) Sex differences were observed in the mediating roles of sleep distress and resilience, with the mediation ratio being higher in boys compared to girls.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IGD is a significant predictor of depression in adolescents, with resilience and sleep distress serving as key mediators. Early identification and targeted interventions for IGD may help prevent depression. Intervention strategies should prioritize enhancing resilience and improving sleep quality, particularly among boys at risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":11787,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","volume":"34 ","pages":"e11"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11886973/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143448587","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-14DOI: 10.1017/S2045796025000034
Louise Birrell, Katrina Prior, Joshua Vescovi, Matthew Sunderland, Tim Slade, Cath Chapman
Aims: Prompt initial contact with a treatment provider is a critical first step in seeking help for a mental or substance use disorders (SUDs). The aim of the current study was to provide estimates of patterns and predictors of delay in making initial treatment contact based on the recently completed Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing.
Methods: Data came a nationally representative epidemiological survey of n = 15,893 Australians. Measures included DSM-IV lifetime diagnoses of mood (MD), anxiety (AD) and SUDs; age of disorder onset; and age of first treatment contact. Correlates of treatment delay were examined.
Results: SUDs exhibited the lowest lifetime treatment rate (27%), compared to MD (94%) and ADs (85%). Individuals with AD experienced the longest delay in seeking treatment (Mdn = 11 years), followed by those with SUDs (Mdn = 8 years) and MDs (Mdn = 3 years). Females had higher odds of seeking treatment for MD and AD but lower odds for SUDs. Recent birth cohorts showed increased treatment seeking across disorders, and higher education was associated with increased treatment seeking for MD and AD. Age of onset, country of birth and co-occurring disorders had mixed associations with treatment seeking.
Conclusions: The study reveals stark disparities in treatment-seeking behaviour and delays across mental and substance use disorders, with a pronounced underutilization of services for SUDs. Additionally, attention should be directed towards early intervention for individuals with earlier symptom onset, those from earlier cohorts and those with co-occurring SUDs.
{"title":"Treatment rates and delays for mental and substance use disorders: results from the Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing.","authors":"Louise Birrell, Katrina Prior, Joshua Vescovi, Matthew Sunderland, Tim Slade, Cath Chapman","doi":"10.1017/S2045796025000034","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S2045796025000034","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Prompt initial contact with a treatment provider is a critical first step in seeking help for a mental or substance use disorders (SUDs). The aim of the current study was to provide estimates of patterns and predictors of delay in making initial treatment contact based on the recently completed Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data came a nationally representative epidemiological survey of <i>n</i> = 15,893 Australians. Measures included DSM-IV lifetime diagnoses of mood (MD), anxiety (AD) and SUDs; age of disorder onset; and age of first treatment contact. Correlates of treatment delay were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SUDs exhibited the lowest lifetime treatment rate (27%), compared to MD (94%) and ADs (85%). Individuals with AD experienced the longest delay in seeking treatment (Mdn = 11 years), followed by those with SUDs (Mdn = 8 years) and MDs (Mdn = 3 years). Females had higher odds of seeking treatment for MD and AD but lower odds for SUDs. Recent birth cohorts showed increased treatment seeking across disorders, and higher education was associated with increased treatment seeking for MD and AD. Age of onset, country of birth and co-occurring disorders had mixed associations with treatment seeking.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study reveals stark disparities in treatment-seeking behaviour and delays across mental and substance use disorders, with a pronounced underutilization of services for SUDs. Additionally, attention should be directed towards early intervention for individuals with earlier symptom onset, those from earlier cohorts and those with co-occurring SUDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":11787,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","volume":"34 ","pages":"e8"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11886968/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143413787","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-13DOI: 10.1017/S2045796024000854
G Yeo, K L Fortuna, J E Lansford, K D Rudolph
Aims: Digital peer support interventions have the potential to promote healthy lifestyles and better mental health. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizes evidence on the effectiveness of digital peer support interventions for enhancing physical and mental health in healthy individuals rather than those diagnosed with a clinical condition.
Methods: First, we evaluated the impact of digital peer support interventions on physical and mental health outcomes by attending to sources of peer support (informal, naturally occurring peer support; formal support from trained peers), effectiveness demonstrated through different study designs (pre-post comparison vs. well-controlled experimental conditions) and long-term effects of interventions. Second, we examined whether features of digital peer support interventions - specifically, dosage, uptake and platform affordances - moderated intervention effectiveness. Third, we considered moderating effects of individual differences (age and existing health conditions) and country.
Results: Using random-effects modelling, which included 47 studies with 76 effect sizes on physical health, and 73 studies with 118 effect sizes on mental health, we found a moderate effect of digital peer support in improving physical health (standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.35, p < 0.001; 95% CI: 0.30-0.41) and a large effect in enhancing mental health (standardized mean difference(SMD) = 0.53, p < 0.001; 95% CI: 0.46-0.61), which were similar across ages and individuals with varying degree of existing health conditions. Different sources of peer support demonstrated similar effects on physical health, but informal, naturally occurring peer support was more effective in bolstering mental health than formal support from trained peers, producing large effects that were comparable to online professional support. Positive effects on physical health were sustained over follow-up assessments, but weakened for mental health over time. Greater dosages of intervention had decreased effectiveness, but uptake of intervention did not moderate the effects on health. Interventions delivered on platforms that afford greater interactivity (apps, social networking sites and video conferencing) were more effective than those with lower interactivity (forums, websites and emails). Digital peer support interventions had stronger effects on improving physical health in Western countries than Eastern countries, but stronger effects on improving mental health in Eastern than Western countries.
Conclusions: Our findings contribute to the nascent conceptual models of digital peer support, lend credence to digital peer support as a scalable preventive intervention with real-world benefits in bolstering individuals' physical and mental health and provide important insights into best practices.
目的:数字同伴支持干预措施具有促进健康生活方式和改善心理健康的潜力。本系统综述和荟萃分析综合了数字同伴支持干预措施对健康个体而非临床诊断患者身心健康的有效性的证据。方法:首先,我们通过关注同伴支持的来源(非正式的、自然发生的同伴支持;来自训练有素的同伴的正式支持),通过不同的研究设计(前后比较与控制良好的实验条件)证明的有效性以及干预措施的长期效果。其次,我们研究了数字同伴支持干预的特征——特别是剂量、吸收和平台的可承受性——是否会调节干预的有效性。第三,我们考虑了个体差异(年龄和现有健康状况)和国家的缓和效应。结果:采用随机效应模型,我们发现数字同伴支持在改善身体健康方面具有中等效果(标准化平均差(SMD) = 0.35, p < 0.001;95% CI: 0.30-0.41),在增强心理健康方面有较大作用(标准化平均差(SMD) = 0.53, p < 0.001;95% CI: 0.46-0.61),在不同年龄和不同健康状况的个体中相似。不同来源的同伴支持对身体健康的影响相似,但非正式的、自然发生的同伴支持在促进心理健康方面比来自训练有素的同伴的正式支持更有效,产生的巨大影响可与在线专业支持相媲美。对身体健康的积极影响在后续评估中持续存在,但对精神健康的影响随着时间的推移而减弱。更大剂量的干预降低了有效性,但采取干预措施并没有减轻对健康的影响。在互动性强的平台(应用程序、社交网站和视频会议)上提供的干预措施比互动性低的平台(论坛、网站和电子邮件)更有效。数字同伴支持干预措施在改善西方国家的身体健康方面的效果强于东方国家,但在改善心理健康方面的效果强于西方国家。结论:我们的研究结果有助于建立数字同伴支持的新兴概念模型,为数字同伴支持作为一种可扩展的预防性干预提供了依据,该干预在促进个人身心健康方面具有现实效益,并为最佳实践提供了重要见解。
{"title":"The effects of digital peer support interventions on physical and mental health: a review and meta-analysis.","authors":"G Yeo, K L Fortuna, J E Lansford, K D Rudolph","doi":"10.1017/S2045796024000854","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S2045796024000854","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Digital peer support interventions have the potential to promote healthy lifestyles and better mental health. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizes evidence on the effectiveness of digital peer support interventions for enhancing physical and mental health in healthy individuals rather than those diagnosed with a clinical condition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>First, we evaluated the impact of digital peer support interventions on physical and mental health outcomes by attending to sources of peer support (informal, naturally occurring peer support; formal support from trained peers), effectiveness demonstrated through different study designs (pre-post comparison vs. well-controlled experimental conditions) and long-term effects of interventions. Second, we examined whether features of digital peer support interventions - specifically, dosage, uptake and platform affordances - moderated intervention effectiveness. Third, we considered moderating effects of individual differences (age and existing health conditions) and country.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using random-effects modelling, which included 47 studies with 76 effect sizes on physical health, and 73 studies with 118 effect sizes on mental health, we found a moderate effect of digital peer support in improving physical health (standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.35, <i>p</i> < 0.001; 95% CI: 0.30-0.41) and a large effect in enhancing mental health (standardized mean difference(SMD) = 0.53, <i>p</i> < 0.001; 95% CI: 0.46-0.61), which were similar across ages and individuals with varying degree of existing health conditions. Different sources of peer support demonstrated similar effects on physical health, but informal, naturally occurring peer support was more effective in bolstering mental health than formal support from trained peers, producing large effects that were comparable to online professional support. Positive effects on physical health were sustained over follow-up assessments, but weakened for mental health over time. Greater dosages of intervention had decreased effectiveness, but uptake of intervention did not moderate the effects on health. Interventions delivered on platforms that afford greater interactivity (apps, social networking sites and video conferencing) were more effective than those with lower interactivity (forums, websites and emails). Digital peer support interventions had stronger effects on improving physical health in Western countries than Eastern countries, but stronger effects on improving mental health in Eastern than Western countries.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings contribute to the nascent conceptual models of digital peer support, lend credence to digital peer support as a scalable preventive intervention with real-world benefits in bolstering individuals' physical and mental health and provide important insights into best practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":11787,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","volume":"34 ","pages":"e9"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11886969/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143406412","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}