Pub Date : 2025-12-03DOI: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001297
Jabeen Fayyaz, Said Hachimi-Idrissi
{"title":"The advanced pediatric emergency course: two decades of pioneering pediatric emergency medicine education.","authors":"Jabeen Fayyaz, Said Hachimi-Idrissi","doi":"10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001297","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001297","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11893,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145676722","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objectives: Survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) often develop psychiatric and epilepsy problems. When arrest occurs with trauma, hypoxic-ischemic, and injury-related insults may heighten risks vs. nontraumatic OHCA. This study aimed to estimate 5-year risks of psychiatric disorders and epilepsy after traumatic vs. nontraumatic OHCA, and to examine whether early pharmacologic treatment relates to outcomes.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study utilized deidentified records from the TriNetX U.S. Collaborative Network (January 2010-June 2023). Adults who achieved return of spontaneous circulation and survived longer than 30 days were categorized into traumatic (n = 1477) and nontraumatic (n = 5165) groups. Propensity score matching (1:1, caliper 0.1) was employed to balance the cohorts. Primary outcomes were overall psychiatric disorders including categories of schizophrenia, mood disorders, depressive disorder, other nonpsychotic mental disorders, anxiety disorders (including phobic and other types), and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The secondary outcome was epilepsy. Kaplan-Meier and Cox models were used to calculate 5-year cumulative incidence and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Results: The primary outcomes showed that survivors of traumatic OHCA faced greater 5-year risks of overall psychiatric disorders (HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.13-1.7) including multiple categories. Hazard ratios of categories were: schizophrenia, 2.23 (95% CI, 1.06-4.68); mood disorders, 1.38 (1.07-1.78); depressive episodes, 1.57 (1.19-2.08); other nonpsychotic mental disorders, 1.51 (1.20-1.92), including phobic anxiety disorders, 1.46 (0.72-2.93) and other anxiety disorders, 1.51 (1.17-1.95); and PTSD, 1.60 (1.02-2.50). The risk of secondary outcome epilepsy increased progressively over time, reaching the highest level at 5 years post-OHCA (HR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.30-3.26).
Conclusion: Traumatic OHCA survivors had higher long-term risks of psychiatric disorders and epilepsy. Early targeted interventions and structured follow-up may help mitigate these risks, warranting confirmation in future prospective studies.
{"title":"Postresuscitation psychiatric disorders and epilepsy in traumatic and nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors: a retrospective real-world study.","authors":"Ping-Kun Tsai, Han-Wei Yeh, Pei-Lun Liao, Jing-Yang Huang, Chung-Hsien Chaou, Chao-Bin Yeh","doi":"10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001293","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001293","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) often develop psychiatric and epilepsy problems. When arrest occurs with trauma, hypoxic-ischemic, and injury-related insults may heighten risks vs. nontraumatic OHCA. This study aimed to estimate 5-year risks of psychiatric disorders and epilepsy after traumatic vs. nontraumatic OHCA, and to examine whether early pharmacologic treatment relates to outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study utilized deidentified records from the TriNetX U.S. Collaborative Network (January 2010-June 2023). Adults who achieved return of spontaneous circulation and survived longer than 30 days were categorized into traumatic (n = 1477) and nontraumatic (n = 5165) groups. Propensity score matching (1:1, caliper 0.1) was employed to balance the cohorts. Primary outcomes were overall psychiatric disorders including categories of schizophrenia, mood disorders, depressive disorder, other nonpsychotic mental disorders, anxiety disorders (including phobic and other types), and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The secondary outcome was epilepsy. Kaplan-Meier and Cox models were used to calculate 5-year cumulative incidence and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary outcomes showed that survivors of traumatic OHCA faced greater 5-year risks of overall psychiatric disorders (HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.13-1.7) including multiple categories. Hazard ratios of categories were: schizophrenia, 2.23 (95% CI, 1.06-4.68); mood disorders, 1.38 (1.07-1.78); depressive episodes, 1.57 (1.19-2.08); other nonpsychotic mental disorders, 1.51 (1.20-1.92), including phobic anxiety disorders, 1.46 (0.72-2.93) and other anxiety disorders, 1.51 (1.17-1.95); and PTSD, 1.60 (1.02-2.50). The risk of secondary outcome epilepsy increased progressively over time, reaching the highest level at 5 years post-OHCA (HR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.30-3.26).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Traumatic OHCA survivors had higher long-term risks of psychiatric disorders and epilepsy. Early targeted interventions and structured follow-up may help mitigate these risks, warranting confirmation in future prospective studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":11893,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145676729","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-07-07DOI: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001259
Rafael Von Hellmann, Ian Ward A Maia, Brian E Driver, Julia M Dorn De Carvalho, Danielle Gerberi, Fernanda Bellolio, Lucas Oliveira J E Silva
Background and importance: Rapid sequence intubation in emergency settings may involve opioid pretreatment to blunt hemodynamic responses during laryngoscopy and intubation; however, opioids may lead to postintubation hypotension, increasing morbidity and mortality. Global clinical practice varies significantly, reflecting uncertainty about opioids' benefits and risks.
Objective: Our goal was to evaluate the association between opioid pretreatment and hemodynamic instability, focusing on postintubation hypotension in adult patients undergoing emergency intubation.
Design, settings, and participants: We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing opioid administration vs. no opioids before adult emergency intubations. Searches included Cochrane, Embase, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science databases until November 2024. Elective intubations were excluded. Eight (6708 patients) studies met criteria.
Outcomes measure and analysis: The primary outcome was postintubation hypotension, variably defined across studies. Secondary outcomes included hypoxemia, first-attempt success, cardiac arrest, and vasopressor use. Independent reviewers conducted data extraction, risk-of-bias assessments, and certainty evaluation. Results were qualitatively synthesized.
Main results: Among 6708 (2757 opioids and 3951 controls) patients, postintubation hypotension incidence varied widely (risk differences: -12.5% favoring opioids to +13.2% favoring controls). The single low-risk randomized study reported opioids increased hypotension (risk difference: 13%, odds ratio: 2.15, 95% confidence interval: 1.22-3.78). Observational studies yielded inconsistent results. Secondary outcomes showed no consistent differences. Evidence certainty was very low because of risk of bias, inconsistency, and imprecision.
Conclusions: Current evidence regarding opioid pretreatment effect on postintubation hypotension risk during emergency intubation is limited and conflicting.
紧急情况下的快速顺序插管可能涉及阿片类药物预处理,以减弱喉镜检查和插管期间的血流动力学反应;然而,阿片类药物可能导致插管后低血压,增加发病率和死亡率。全球临床实践差异很大,反映了阿片类药物益处和风险的不确定性。我们的目的是评估阿片类药物预处理与血流动力学不稳定之间的关系,重点关注急诊插管后成人患者的插管后低血压。我们对成人急诊插管前使用阿片类药物与不使用阿片类药物的随机对照试验和观察性研究进行了系统回顾。搜索包括Cochrane, Embase, Medline, Scopus和Web of Science数据库,直到2024年11月。排除选择性插管。8项(6708例患者)研究符合标准。主要结局是插管后低血压,在不同的研究中定义不同。次要结局包括低氧血症、首次尝试成功、心脏骤停和血管加压药的使用。独立审稿人进行了数据提取、偏倚风险评估和确定性评估。结果定性合成。在6708例(2757例阿片类药物和3951例对照组)患者中,插管后低血压发生率差异很大(风险差异:阿片类药物组为-12.5%,对照组为+13.2%)。单一低风险随机研究报告阿片类药物增加低血压(风险差:13%,优势比:2.15,95%置信区间:1.22-3.78)。观察性研究得出了不一致的结果。次要结果没有一致的差异。由于存在偏倚、不一致和不精确的风险,证据确定性非常低。目前关于阿片类药物预处理对急诊插管后低血压风险的影响的证据有限且相互矛盾。
{"title":"Effect of pretreatment opioids on hemodynamics during emergency intubations: a systematic review.","authors":"Rafael Von Hellmann, Ian Ward A Maia, Brian E Driver, Julia M Dorn De Carvalho, Danielle Gerberi, Fernanda Bellolio, Lucas Oliveira J E Silva","doi":"10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001259","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001259","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and importance: </strong>Rapid sequence intubation in emergency settings may involve opioid pretreatment to blunt hemodynamic responses during laryngoscopy and intubation; however, opioids may lead to postintubation hypotension, increasing morbidity and mortality. Global clinical practice varies significantly, reflecting uncertainty about opioids' benefits and risks.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our goal was to evaluate the association between opioid pretreatment and hemodynamic instability, focusing on postintubation hypotension in adult patients undergoing emergency intubation.</p><p><strong>Design, settings, and participants: </strong>We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing opioid administration vs. no opioids before adult emergency intubations. Searches included Cochrane, Embase, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science databases until November 2024. Elective intubations were excluded. Eight (6708 patients) studies met criteria.</p><p><strong>Outcomes measure and analysis: </strong>The primary outcome was postintubation hypotension, variably defined across studies. Secondary outcomes included hypoxemia, first-attempt success, cardiac arrest, and vasopressor use. Independent reviewers conducted data extraction, risk-of-bias assessments, and certainty evaluation. Results were qualitatively synthesized.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>Among 6708 (2757 opioids and 3951 controls) patients, postintubation hypotension incidence varied widely (risk differences: -12.5% favoring opioids to +13.2% favoring controls). The single low-risk randomized study reported opioids increased hypotension (risk difference: 13%, odds ratio: 2.15, 95% confidence interval: 1.22-3.78). Observational studies yielded inconsistent results. Secondary outcomes showed no consistent differences. Evidence certainty was very low because of risk of bias, inconsistency, and imprecision.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Current evidence regarding opioid pretreatment effect on postintubation hypotension risk during emergency intubation is limited and conflicting.</p>","PeriodicalId":11893,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"405-413"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144599771","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-09-05DOI: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001276
Lucas Oliveira J E Silva, Rafael Von Hellmann, Bruno A M Pinheiro Besen, Julia M Dorn de Carvalho, Ludhmila Abrahao Hajjar, Daniel Pedrollo, Caio Goncalves Nogueira, Natalia Mansur P Figueiredo, Carlos Henrique Miranda, Danilo Martins, Thiago Dias Baumgratz, Bruno Bergesch, Diogo Costa, Osmar Colleoni, Juliana Zanettini, Ana Paula Freitas, Nicole Pinheiro Moreira, Patricia Lopes Gaspar, Renato Tambelli, Maria Cristina Costa, Samara Silveira, Wilsterman Correia, Rafael Garcia de Maria, Ubirajara A Vinholes Filho, Andre P Weber, Vinicius da Silva Castro, Carlos Fernando D Dornelles, Barbara S Tabach, Hélio P Guimarães, Gabriela Stanzani, Thiago F Gava, Aidan Mullan, Gabriel Petrin Alonso Silva, Giovanna Cardoso de Oliveira, Benjamin J Sandefur, Fernanda Bellolio, Julio C G Alencar, Ian Ward A Maia
Background and importance: Emergency airway management in the emergency department (ED) is a high-risk procedure associated with patient outcomes. First-attempt success is a widely recognized quality metric, as multiple attempts are associated with an increased risk of peri-intubation complications. In Brazil, where emergency medicine is a recently established specialty, many ED are staffed by physicians without formal emergency medicine training. The association between emergency medicine training and intubation outcomes in this setting has not been well characterized.
Objective: To assess the association of physician specialty with first-attempt success and immediate peri-intubation complications in Brazilian EDs.
Design: Secondary analysis of a multicenter, prospective cohort study from the Brazilian Airway Registry Cooperation.
Setting and participants: This study included adult patients who underwent tracheal intubation in EDs between March 2022 and April 2024. Patients were excluded if the intubation occurred outside the ED, during cardiopulmonary resuscitation, or for elective procedures. Intubations performed by medical students were also excluded. Physicians were categorized by specialty as emergency medicine or nonemergency medicine.
Outcome measures and analysis: The primary outcome was first-attempt success; secondary outcomes included peri-intubation complications (severe hypoxemia, hemodynamic instability, and cardiac arrest). Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between physician specialty and outcomes.
Main results: Among 2582 patients, 1087 (42.1%) were intubated by emergency physicians and 1495 (57.9%) by other physicians (mainly internal medicine and surgery). Intubations by emergency physicians were associated with a higher rate of first-attempt success [80.4 vs. 70.9%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.63, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.34-1.97]. There was also a higher odds of intubations without major complications (aOR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.01-1.42).
Conclusion: In this study, there was a higher rate of first-attempt success in intubations performed by board-certified emergency physicians compared with other physicians working in Brazilian EDs.
{"title":"Association between physician specialty and first-attempt intubation success in the emergency department.","authors":"Lucas Oliveira J E Silva, Rafael Von Hellmann, Bruno A M Pinheiro Besen, Julia M Dorn de Carvalho, Ludhmila Abrahao Hajjar, Daniel Pedrollo, Caio Goncalves Nogueira, Natalia Mansur P Figueiredo, Carlos Henrique Miranda, Danilo Martins, Thiago Dias Baumgratz, Bruno Bergesch, Diogo Costa, Osmar Colleoni, Juliana Zanettini, Ana Paula Freitas, Nicole Pinheiro Moreira, Patricia Lopes Gaspar, Renato Tambelli, Maria Cristina Costa, Samara Silveira, Wilsterman Correia, Rafael Garcia de Maria, Ubirajara A Vinholes Filho, Andre P Weber, Vinicius da Silva Castro, Carlos Fernando D Dornelles, Barbara S Tabach, Hélio P Guimarães, Gabriela Stanzani, Thiago F Gava, Aidan Mullan, Gabriel Petrin Alonso Silva, Giovanna Cardoso de Oliveira, Benjamin J Sandefur, Fernanda Bellolio, Julio C G Alencar, Ian Ward A Maia","doi":"10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001276","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001276","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and importance: </strong>Emergency airway management in the emergency department (ED) is a high-risk procedure associated with patient outcomes. First-attempt success is a widely recognized quality metric, as multiple attempts are associated with an increased risk of peri-intubation complications. In Brazil, where emergency medicine is a recently established specialty, many ED are staffed by physicians without formal emergency medicine training. The association between emergency medicine training and intubation outcomes in this setting has not been well characterized.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the association of physician specialty with first-attempt success and immediate peri-intubation complications in Brazilian EDs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Secondary analysis of a multicenter, prospective cohort study from the Brazilian Airway Registry Cooperation.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>This study included adult patients who underwent tracheal intubation in EDs between March 2022 and April 2024. Patients were excluded if the intubation occurred outside the ED, during cardiopulmonary resuscitation, or for elective procedures. Intubations performed by medical students were also excluded. Physicians were categorized by specialty as emergency medicine or nonemergency medicine.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and analysis: </strong>The primary outcome was first-attempt success; secondary outcomes included peri-intubation complications (severe hypoxemia, hemodynamic instability, and cardiac arrest). Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between physician specialty and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>Among 2582 patients, 1087 (42.1%) were intubated by emergency physicians and 1495 (57.9%) by other physicians (mainly internal medicine and surgery). Intubations by emergency physicians were associated with a higher rate of first-attempt success [80.4 vs. 70.9%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.63, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.34-1.97]. There was also a higher odds of intubations without major complications (aOR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.01-1.42).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, there was a higher rate of first-attempt success in intubations performed by board-certified emergency physicians compared with other physicians working in Brazilian EDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":11893,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"430-436"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145029209","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background and importance: Although advanced airway management is beneficial for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in certain situations, the impact of advanced airway management success or failure by the emergency medical service (EMS) crew on the clinical time course and outcomes has not yet been thoroughly evaluated.
Objectives: To evaluate the impact of EMS crew members' prehospital advanced airway management failure on patient outcomes in OHCA.
Design: Retrospective multicentre registry study.
Setting and participants: Data from an OHCA survey in a Japanese retrospective multicentre study conducted between 2019 and 2021 were reviewed.
Outcome measures and analysis: Patients who underwent advanced airway management were divided into success and failure groups. The baseline characteristics and outcomes of the two groups were evaluated. Propensity score matching was performed by creating matched success and failure groups to analyse sensitivity. The primary outcome was 30-day survival, and secondary outcomes were favourable neurological outcomes at discharge, time from on-scene EMS arrival to hospital arrival, and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC).
Main results: Overall, 4474 patients who underwent prehospital advanced airway management were analysed. Among them, 4074 and 400 patients were in the success and failure groups, respectively. The 30-day survival rates (success vs. failure, 4.4 vs. 2.3%; P = 0.043) and ROSC (29.9 vs. 16.8%; P < 0.001) in the failure group were lower than those in the success group. There were no significant differences in survival rate at hospital discharge (3.6 vs. 2.0%; P = 0.093) and favourable neurological outcomes (1.3 vs. 1.3%; P = 0.930) between the groups. The median time from on-scene EMS arrival to hospital arrival (min) [28.0 (22.0-34.0) vs. 29.0 (25.9-35.0); P < 0.001] in the failure group was longer than that in the success group. After propensity score matching, the results showed a similar trend.
Conclusion: Prehospital advanced airway management failure was associated with lower 30-day survival rates, ROSC, and a longer time between EMS arrival and hospital arrival. These findings suggest that failure of prehospital advanced airway management could potentially worsen the outcomes of patients with OHCA.
背景和重要性:虽然在某些情况下,先进的气道管理对院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者是有益的,但紧急医疗服务(EMS)人员先进的气道管理成功或失败对临床时间过程和结果的影响尚未得到彻底的评估。目的:评价急诊乘务员院前气道管理失败对OHCA患者预后的影响。设计:回顾性多中心注册研究。环境和参与者:回顾了2019年至2021年在日本进行的一项回顾性多中心研究中的OHCA调查数据。结果测量和分析:将接受先进气道管理的患者分为成功组和失败组。评估两组患者的基线特征和预后。通过创建匹配的成功和失败组来进行倾向评分匹配,以分析敏感性。主要预后指标为30天生存率,次要预后指标为出院时良好的神经系统预后、从现场EMS到达医院到到达医院的时间以及自然循环恢复(ROSC)。主要结果:总共分析了4474例院前高级气道管理患者。其中成功组4074例,失败组400例。30天生存率(成功vs失败,4.4 vs 2.3%;P = 0.043)和ROSC (29.9 vs. 16.8%;结论:院前晚期气道管理失败与较低的30天生存率、ROSC以及EMS到达医院的时间较长有关。这些发现表明院前高级气道管理的失败可能会使OHCA患者的预后恶化。
{"title":"Comparison of outcomes between successful and failed prehospital advanced airway management by paramedic staff in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.","authors":"Wataru Takayama, Momoko Sugimoto, Koji Morishita, Yasuhiro Otomo, Nobuya Kitamura, Takashi Tagami","doi":"10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001231","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001231","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and importance: </strong>Although advanced airway management is beneficial for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in certain situations, the impact of advanced airway management success or failure by the emergency medical service (EMS) crew on the clinical time course and outcomes has not yet been thoroughly evaluated.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the impact of EMS crew members' prehospital advanced airway management failure on patient outcomes in OHCA.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective multicentre registry study.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>Data from an OHCA survey in a Japanese retrospective multicentre study conducted between 2019 and 2021 were reviewed.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and analysis: </strong>Patients who underwent advanced airway management were divided into success and failure groups. The baseline characteristics and outcomes of the two groups were evaluated. Propensity score matching was performed by creating matched success and failure groups to analyse sensitivity. The primary outcome was 30-day survival, and secondary outcomes were favourable neurological outcomes at discharge, time from on-scene EMS arrival to hospital arrival, and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC).</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>Overall, 4474 patients who underwent prehospital advanced airway management were analysed. Among them, 4074 and 400 patients were in the success and failure groups, respectively. The 30-day survival rates (success vs. failure, 4.4 vs. 2.3%; P = 0.043) and ROSC (29.9 vs. 16.8%; P < 0.001) in the failure group were lower than those in the success group. There were no significant differences in survival rate at hospital discharge (3.6 vs. 2.0%; P = 0.093) and favourable neurological outcomes (1.3 vs. 1.3%; P = 0.930) between the groups. The median time from on-scene EMS arrival to hospital arrival (min) [28.0 (22.0-34.0) vs. 29.0 (25.9-35.0); P < 0.001] in the failure group was longer than that in the success group. After propensity score matching, the results showed a similar trend.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prehospital advanced airway management failure was associated with lower 30-day survival rates, ROSC, and a longer time between EMS arrival and hospital arrival. These findings suggest that failure of prehospital advanced airway management could potentially worsen the outcomes of patients with OHCA.</p>","PeriodicalId":11893,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"437-444"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12560190/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143763513","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-07-01DOI: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001256
François Javaudin, Mathilde Papin, Louis-Marie Bodet, Joël Jenvrin, Philippe Pes, Quentin Le Bastard
Background: Pediatric out-of-hospital tracheal intubation is associated with lower success rates compared with adult populations and presents distinct clinical challenges. Achieving success on the first attempt is critical, as multiple intubation attempts are associated with an increased risk of adverse events.
Objectives: The aims were to identify factors available before laryngoscopy that are independently associated with first-attempt success in pediatric out-of-hospital intubation and to evaluate the performance of a gestalt evaluation of intubation difficulty scale.
Methods: Data were extracted from a retrospective, observational, multicenter cohort study conducted in three physician-staffed mobile intensive care units (ICUs) in France. The study included patients aged 0-17 years who required out-of-hospital airway management. The primary outcome was successful intubation on the first attempt. A multivariable logistic regression model was constructed including clinically relevant variables available before laryngoscope insertion.
Results: A total of 206 pediatric patients were included in the analysis, with a median age of 6 years (interquartile range: 1-16). The overall first-attempt success rate was 59.7% [95% confidence interval (CI): (52.7-66.4)]. In the multivariable analysis, patient age [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): for 2-9 years, 2.33, 95% CI: (1.00-5.39); for 10-17 years, 3.86, 95% CI: (1.55-9.60); reference: 0-1 years] and presence of a soiled airway before laryngoscopy [aOR, 0.38, 95% CI: (0.20-0.71)] were independent predictors of successful intubation on the first attempt. The gestalt evaluation of the intubation difficulty scale yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.63, 95% CI: (0.56-0.71), and it showed only a weak correlation with the Cormack-Lehane grade (Kendall tau-b = 0.36; P < 0.001).
Conclusion: In this cohort of pediatric tracheal intubation procedures performed by physician-staffed mobile ICUs, soiled airways and younger age were associated with a lower incidence of first-attempt success. The gestalt evaluation of intubation difficulty demonstrated poor discriminative ability.
{"title":"Prelaryngoscopy predictors of first-attempt success in pediatric out-of-hospital intubation: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"François Javaudin, Mathilde Papin, Louis-Marie Bodet, Joël Jenvrin, Philippe Pes, Quentin Le Bastard","doi":"10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001256","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001256","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pediatric out-of-hospital tracheal intubation is associated with lower success rates compared with adult populations and presents distinct clinical challenges. Achieving success on the first attempt is critical, as multiple intubation attempts are associated with an increased risk of adverse events.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aims were to identify factors available before laryngoscopy that are independently associated with first-attempt success in pediatric out-of-hospital intubation and to evaluate the performance of a gestalt evaluation of intubation difficulty scale.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were extracted from a retrospective, observational, multicenter cohort study conducted in three physician-staffed mobile intensive care units (ICUs) in France. The study included patients aged 0-17 years who required out-of-hospital airway management. The primary outcome was successful intubation on the first attempt. A multivariable logistic regression model was constructed including clinically relevant variables available before laryngoscope insertion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 206 pediatric patients were included in the analysis, with a median age of 6 years (interquartile range: 1-16). The overall first-attempt success rate was 59.7% [95% confidence interval (CI): (52.7-66.4)]. In the multivariable analysis, patient age [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): for 2-9 years, 2.33, 95% CI: (1.00-5.39); for 10-17 years, 3.86, 95% CI: (1.55-9.60); reference: 0-1 years] and presence of a soiled airway before laryngoscopy [aOR, 0.38, 95% CI: (0.20-0.71)] were independent predictors of successful intubation on the first attempt. The gestalt evaluation of the intubation difficulty scale yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.63, 95% CI: (0.56-0.71), and it showed only a weak correlation with the Cormack-Lehane grade (Kendall tau-b = 0.36; P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this cohort of pediatric tracheal intubation procedures performed by physician-staffed mobile ICUs, soiled airways and younger age were associated with a lower incidence of first-attempt success. The gestalt evaluation of intubation difficulty demonstrated poor discriminative ability.</p>","PeriodicalId":11893,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"414-420"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144539628","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-10-14DOI: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001278
Thomas Clavier, Quentin Macre, Alexandre Bourgeois, Baptiste Compagnon, Nathalie Delhaye, Alexis Fremery, Elisabeth Gaertner, Claire Gamblin, Pierre Gosset, Vincent Legros, Jean Pasqueron, Pierre-Antoine Allain, Véronique Ramonda, Hugues Ravaux, Benjamin Rieu, Matthieu Rossi, Mathieu Willig, Olivier Clovet, Benjamin Popoff
Objective: Hemorrhagic shock after severe trauma has a high mortality rate. Intubation may increase hemodynamic failure in shocked patients. Our aim was to assess the association of intubation timing with mortality and morbidity among patients with hemorrhagic shock after severe trauma.
Methods: This is a retrospective, multicenter study using data from the French Traumabase registry that includes severely injured trauma patients admitted to trauma centers. Patients were included if they were intubated, presented with hemorrhagic shock following severe trauma [≥four packed red blood cells (PRBCs) transfusions within the first 6 h of care], and underwent hemostasis surgery or interventional radiology procedure within 24 h of admission. Patients with severe trauma brain injury (abbreviated injury scale head ≥3) were excluded. The primary outcome was all-cause ICU mortality. Secondary outcomes were: time to hospital arrival, ICU and hospital lengths of stay, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, prehospital norepinephrine use, and number of PRBCs transfusions within the first 24 h. Patients were categorized by intubation timing (prehospital intubation vs. in-hospital intubation) and matched by propensity score based on variables associated with the occurrence of prehospital intubation.
Results: Among the 840 patients included [mean age 41 (±18), 646 (74%) male], 455 (54%) had road traffic accidents, 153 (18%) falls, and 189 (23%) penetrating trauma. The median Injury Severity Score was 22 (16-34). After propensity score matching, 454 patients (227/group) were analyzed. Twenty-three patients (10%) died in the ICU in the prehospital intubation group vs. 18 (7.9%) in in-hospital intubation group [OR 1.28, 95% CI (0.69-2.37)]. Concerning secondary outcomes, prehospital intubation was associated with a higher need for norepinephrine support [130 (57%) vs. 83 (37%); OR 2.47, 95% CI (1.64-3.72)] and a longer time to hospital arrival [median within-pair absolute difference: 15 min; 95% CI (5-27)]. There was no significant difference for other secondary outcomes.
Conclusion: In this cohort of patients with hemorrhagic shock after severe trauma, prehospital intubation was not associated with a change in ICU-mortality.
{"title":"Association of prehospital vs. in-hospital intubation with mortality in hemorrhagic shock after severe trauma: a propensity-matched study.","authors":"Thomas Clavier, Quentin Macre, Alexandre Bourgeois, Baptiste Compagnon, Nathalie Delhaye, Alexis Fremery, Elisabeth Gaertner, Claire Gamblin, Pierre Gosset, Vincent Legros, Jean Pasqueron, Pierre-Antoine Allain, Véronique Ramonda, Hugues Ravaux, Benjamin Rieu, Matthieu Rossi, Mathieu Willig, Olivier Clovet, Benjamin Popoff","doi":"10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001278","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001278","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Hemorrhagic shock after severe trauma has a high mortality rate. Intubation may increase hemodynamic failure in shocked patients. Our aim was to assess the association of intubation timing with mortality and morbidity among patients with hemorrhagic shock after severe trauma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective, multicenter study using data from the French Traumabase registry that includes severely injured trauma patients admitted to trauma centers. Patients were included if they were intubated, presented with hemorrhagic shock following severe trauma [≥four packed red blood cells (PRBCs) transfusions within the first 6 h of care], and underwent hemostasis surgery or interventional radiology procedure within 24 h of admission. Patients with severe trauma brain injury (abbreviated injury scale head ≥3) were excluded. The primary outcome was all-cause ICU mortality. Secondary outcomes were: time to hospital arrival, ICU and hospital lengths of stay, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, prehospital norepinephrine use, and number of PRBCs transfusions within the first 24 h. Patients were categorized by intubation timing (prehospital intubation vs. in-hospital intubation) and matched by propensity score based on variables associated with the occurrence of prehospital intubation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 840 patients included [mean age 41 (±18), 646 (74%) male], 455 (54%) had road traffic accidents, 153 (18%) falls, and 189 (23%) penetrating trauma. The median Injury Severity Score was 22 (16-34). After propensity score matching, 454 patients (227/group) were analyzed. Twenty-three patients (10%) died in the ICU in the prehospital intubation group vs. 18 (7.9%) in in-hospital intubation group [OR 1.28, 95% CI (0.69-2.37)]. Concerning secondary outcomes, prehospital intubation was associated with a higher need for norepinephrine support [130 (57%) vs. 83 (37%); OR 2.47, 95% CI (1.64-3.72)] and a longer time to hospital arrival [median within-pair absolute difference: 15 min; 95% CI (5-27)]. There was no significant difference for other secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this cohort of patients with hemorrhagic shock after severe trauma, prehospital intubation was not associated with a change in ICU-mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":11893,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"421-429"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145344422","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-10-14DOI: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001279
Niccolò Parri, Jim Connolly, Tatjana Rajkovic, Carmen Diana Cimpoesu, Robert Leach
{"title":"The European Society for Emergency Medicine (EUSEM) position on the health and humanitarian crisis in Gaza.","authors":"Niccolò Parri, Jim Connolly, Tatjana Rajkovic, Carmen Diana Cimpoesu, Robert Leach","doi":"10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001279","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001279","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11893,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"383-384"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145299344","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-10-28DOI: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001269
Sean P Collins, Peter S Pang
{"title":"Acute heart failure management in the emergency setting: time to put evidence into action.","authors":"Sean P Collins, Peter S Pang","doi":"10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001269","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001269","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11893,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"32 6","pages":"387-388"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145408420","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-10-28DOI: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001287
Òscar Miró
{"title":"Physician specialty as a factor of success at the first-attempt intubation in the emergency department: practical implications.","authors":"Òscar Miró","doi":"10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001287","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001287","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11893,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"32 6","pages":"389-391"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145408515","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}