Pub Date : 2025-04-01Epub Date: 2025-02-25DOI: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001211
Barbra E Backus
{"title":"Highlights from the abstracts of EUSEM 2024 in Copenhagen.","authors":"Barbra E Backus","doi":"10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001211","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001211","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11893,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"32 2","pages":"73-74"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143514703","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Acute dyspnea is a common symptom whose management is challenging in prehospital settings. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is increasingly accessible because of device miniaturization. To assess the contribution of POCUS in the prehospital management of patients with acute nontraumatic dyspnea, we performed a systematic review on nontrauma patients of any age managed in the prehospital setting for acute dyspnea and receiving a POCUS examination. We searched seven databases and gray literature for English-language studies published from January 1995 to November 2023. Two independent reviewers completed the study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. The primary outcome was the assessment of the contribution of POCUS to feasibility, diagnostic, therapeutic, prognosis, patient referral, and transport vector modification. Twenty-three studies were included. The risk of bias assessment identified 3 intermediate-risk, 18 serious-risk, and 2 critical-risk studies. Three studies reported moderate to excellent feasibility for lung POCUS, and three studies reported poor to mediocre feasibility for cardiac POCUS. The median duration of the POCUS examination was less than 5 minutes (six studies). POCUS improved diagnostic identification (seven studies). The diagnostic accuracy of POCUS was excellent for pneumothorax (sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 100%, two studies), very good for acute heart failure (sensitivity = 71-100%, specificity = 72-95%, eight studies), good for pneumonia (sensitivity = 88%, specificity = 59%, one study), and moderate for pleural effusion (sensitivity = 26-53%, specificity = 83-92%, two studies). Treatment was modified in 11 to 54% of the patients (seven studies). POCUS had no significant effect on patient prognosis (two studies). POCUS contributed to patient referrals and transport vectors in 51% (four studies) and 25% (three studies) of patients, respectively. The evidence supports the use of POCUS for managing acute nontraumatic dyspnea in the prehospital setting in terms of feasibility, overall diagnostic contribution, and, particularly, lung ultrasound for acute heart failure diagnosis. Moreover, POCUS seems to have a therapeutic contribution. There is not enough evidence supporting the use of POCUS for pneumonia, pleural effusion, pneumothorax, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or asthma exacerbation diagnosis, nor does it support prognostic, patient referral, and transport vector contribution. A high level of evidence is lacking and needed.
{"title":"Contribution of point-of-care ultrasound in the prehospital management of patients with non-trauma acute dyspnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Omide Taheri, Julie Samain, Frédéric Mauny, Marc Puyraveau, Thibaut Desmettre, Tania Marx","doi":"10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001205","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001205","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acute dyspnea is a common symptom whose management is challenging in prehospital settings. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is increasingly accessible because of device miniaturization. To assess the contribution of POCUS in the prehospital management of patients with acute nontraumatic dyspnea, we performed a systematic review on nontrauma patients of any age managed in the prehospital setting for acute dyspnea and receiving a POCUS examination. We searched seven databases and gray literature for English-language studies published from January 1995 to November 2023. Two independent reviewers completed the study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. The primary outcome was the assessment of the contribution of POCUS to feasibility, diagnostic, therapeutic, prognosis, patient referral, and transport vector modification. Twenty-three studies were included. The risk of bias assessment identified 3 intermediate-risk, 18 serious-risk, and 2 critical-risk studies. Three studies reported moderate to excellent feasibility for lung POCUS, and three studies reported poor to mediocre feasibility for cardiac POCUS. The median duration of the POCUS examination was less than 5 minutes (six studies). POCUS improved diagnostic identification (seven studies). The diagnostic accuracy of POCUS was excellent for pneumothorax (sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 100%, two studies), very good for acute heart failure (sensitivity = 71-100%, specificity = 72-95%, eight studies), good for pneumonia (sensitivity = 88%, specificity = 59%, one study), and moderate for pleural effusion (sensitivity = 26-53%, specificity = 83-92%, two studies). Treatment was modified in 11 to 54% of the patients (seven studies). POCUS had no significant effect on patient prognosis (two studies). POCUS contributed to patient referrals and transport vectors in 51% (four studies) and 25% (three studies) of patients, respectively. The evidence supports the use of POCUS for managing acute nontraumatic dyspnea in the prehospital setting in terms of feasibility, overall diagnostic contribution, and, particularly, lung ultrasound for acute heart failure diagnosis. Moreover, POCUS seems to have a therapeutic contribution. There is not enough evidence supporting the use of POCUS for pneumonia, pleural effusion, pneumothorax, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or asthma exacerbation diagnosis, nor does it support prognostic, patient referral, and transport vector contribution. A high level of evidence is lacking and needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":11893,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"87-99"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11855997/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142779659","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-01Epub Date: 2024-12-23DOI: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001212
Anne-Laure Philippon, Soufiane Lebal, Marta Cancella de Abreu, Camille Gerlier, Oscar Mirò, Tabassome Simon, Yonathan Freund
Importance: The impact of early antibiotics on mortality in patients with suspected sepsis in the emergency department (ED) remains debated, particularly in patients with less severe presentations or before infection confirmation.
Objective: To evaluate the association between time to antibiotic administration and 28-day in-hospital mortality among patients with suspected sepsis in the ED.
Design, setting, and participants: Post hoc analysis of the 1-bundle emergency department trial, a multicenter, stepped-wedge cluster-randomized controlled trial conducted in 23 EDs in France and Spain. A total of 872 patients with suspected sepsis were included between June 2022 and September 2023. All patients with available data on antibiotic administration were analyzed, and a subgroup of patients with no hypotension was also assessed.
Exposures: Time to antibiotic administration. The effect of time to fluid resuscitation was also assessed.
Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality at 28 days. Secondary outcomes included all-cause 28-day mortality, ICU length of stay, number of days without vasopressors at day 28, and change in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score at 72 h.
Results: Among 872 patients (mean age 66 years; 41% female), 859 had available data on antibiotic administration (primary analysis) and 791 (92%) received antibiotics. The median time to antibiotic administration was 61 min (IQR 14-169), with 457 patients (58%) receiving antibiotics within 1 h. In-hospital mortality at 28 days was 14.7% for patients who did not received antibiotic within 1 h versus 9.6% for patients who did [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.00 (1.24-3.23)]. There was an aOR of 1.06 (1.02-1.1) for each hour of delay for antibiotic administration. This effect was confirmed in patients without hypotension [aOR 2.02 (1.08-3.76) for patients who received antibiotics beyond 1 h]. Time to fluid resuscitation was not associated with 28-day in-hospital mortality.
Conclusion and relevance: In patients with suspected sepsis presenting to the ED antibiotic administration beyond 1 h was associated with a two-fold increased 28-day in-hospital mortality. This effect persisted in patients without hypotension.
{"title":"Association between time to antibiotic and mortality in patients with suspected sepsis in the Emergency Department: post hoc analysis of the 1-BED randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Anne-Laure Philippon, Soufiane Lebal, Marta Cancella de Abreu, Camille Gerlier, Oscar Mirò, Tabassome Simon, Yonathan Freund","doi":"10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001212","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001212","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The impact of early antibiotics on mortality in patients with suspected sepsis in the emergency department (ED) remains debated, particularly in patients with less severe presentations or before infection confirmation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the association between time to antibiotic administration and 28-day in-hospital mortality among patients with suspected sepsis in the ED.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>Post hoc analysis of the 1-bundle emergency department trial, a multicenter, stepped-wedge cluster-randomized controlled trial conducted in 23 EDs in France and Spain. A total of 872 patients with suspected sepsis were included between June 2022 and September 2023. All patients with available data on antibiotic administration were analyzed, and a subgroup of patients with no hypotension was also assessed.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Time to antibiotic administration. The effect of time to fluid resuscitation was also assessed.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality at 28 days. Secondary outcomes included all-cause 28-day mortality, ICU length of stay, number of days without vasopressors at day 28, and change in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score at 72 h.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 872 patients (mean age 66 years; 41% female), 859 had available data on antibiotic administration (primary analysis) and 791 (92%) received antibiotics. The median time to antibiotic administration was 61 min (IQR 14-169), with 457 patients (58%) receiving antibiotics within 1 h. In-hospital mortality at 28 days was 14.7% for patients who did not received antibiotic within 1 h versus 9.6% for patients who did [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.00 (1.24-3.23)]. There was an aOR of 1.06 (1.02-1.1) for each hour of delay for antibiotic administration. This effect was confirmed in patients without hypotension [aOR 2.02 (1.08-3.76) for patients who received antibiotics beyond 1 h]. Time to fluid resuscitation was not associated with 28-day in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>In patients with suspected sepsis presenting to the ED antibiotic administration beyond 1 h was associated with a two-fold increased 28-day in-hospital mortality. This effect persisted in patients without hypotension.</p>","PeriodicalId":11893,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"109-115"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142863717","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-01Epub Date: 2025-02-25DOI: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001190
Chiara Morlotti, Mattia Cattaneo, Francesco Paleari, Filippo Manelli, Francesco Locati
{"title":"Predicting emergency department revisits with hospitalization in a multihospital network: a large-scale assessment.","authors":"Chiara Morlotti, Mattia Cattaneo, Francesco Paleari, Filippo Manelli, Francesco Locati","doi":"10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001190","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001190","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11893,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"32 2","pages":"141-143"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143514967","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-11-21DOI: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001197
Kiren Govender, Eugenia Lupan-Muresan
{"title":"Emergency medicine training in Europe: the Young Emergency Medicine Doctors perspective.","authors":"Kiren Govender, Eugenia Lupan-Muresan","doi":"10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001197","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001197","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11893,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"5-7"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142779660","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-11-21DOI: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001200
Ruth Brown, Gregor Prosen, Eric Dryver
{"title":"The new European Training Requirements for emergency medicine: rationale and implementation.","authors":"Ruth Brown, Gregor Prosen, Eric Dryver","doi":"10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001200","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001200","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11893,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"8-9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142686391","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-12-23DOI: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001185
Shai Geron, Tomer Kaplan, Elad Brav, Rafael Strugo, Ohad Gabay, Oren Wacht, Amit Frenkel
{"title":"The impact of prehospital transport method on time to first computed tomography scan in patients with acute stroke: a retrospective district-wide analysis.","authors":"Shai Geron, Tomer Kaplan, Elad Brav, Rafael Strugo, Ohad Gabay, Oren Wacht, Amit Frenkel","doi":"10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001185","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001185","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11893,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"32 1","pages":"64-65"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142893165","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-12-23DOI: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001180
Heleen H R De Smedt, Pauline M Mertens, Olivier Hoogmartens, Piet R Verheye, Marc Sabbe
{"title":"TRACK-ED: implementing a real-time location system at an emergency department: feasibility, challenges and future possibilities.","authors":"Heleen H R De Smedt, Pauline M Mertens, Olivier Hoogmartens, Piet R Verheye, Marc Sabbe","doi":"10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001180","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001180","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11893,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"32 1","pages":"62-63"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142893167","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-12-23DOI: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001204
Howard Bauchner, Frederick P Rivara
{"title":"Evolving issues in open science.","authors":"Howard Bauchner, Frederick P Rivara","doi":"10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001204","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001204","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11893,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"32 1","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142893157","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}