European Journal of Emergency Medicine最新文献

Background and importance: The diagnostic accuracy of focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) performed in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain is currently unknown.

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of regional wall motion abnormalities detected with FoCUS for non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) diagnosis.

Design: A Single-center prospective observational study conducted in 2022 in the ED of the University Hospital Careggi, Italy.

Setting and participants: Adult patients presenting to the ED with acute nontraumatic chest pain were enrolled, irrespective of the presence of previous regional wall motion abnormalities. Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions and patients with hemodynamic instability were excluded. FoCUS was performed at presentation by a trained ED physician.

Outcome measures and analysis: The final diagnosis of NSTE-ACS vs. alternative diagnosis was adjudicated by an ED physician blinded to FoCUS results after a 30-day follow-up. To assess if regional wall motion abnormalities were an independent predictor of NSTE-ACS, a multivariable logistic regression model was built. Diagnostic performance measures were calculated. A sensitivity analysis considering only type-1 NSTEMIs (i.e. plaque rupture/thrombosis) was conducted.

Main results: Among 686 patients, NSTE-ACS was adjudicated in 106 (15.5%) patients, 67 of which were NSTEMIs. A total of 87 (12.7%) patients had regional wall motion abnormalities detected by FoCUS, which were an independent predictor of NSTE-ACS in the multivariable logistic regression analysis. Regional wall motion abnormalities had a sensitivity of 42.5% (33.0-51.9), a specificity of 92.8% (90.6-94.9), a negative predictive value of 89.8% (87.4-92.2), and a positive predictive value of 51.7% (41.2-62.2), for NSTE-ACS. Results were consistent in the sensitivity analysis.

Conclusions: In ED patients with chest pain and no ST elevation, the detection of regional wall motion abnormalities was a predictor of NSTE-ACS. Despite a high specificity, which indicated a possible role of FoCUS in the rule-in of NSTE-ACS, sensitivity was too low to allow a safe rule-out using FoCUS results alone.

Aims: The optimal dose of diuretics and nitrates for acute heart failure treatment remains uncertain. This study aimed to assess the association between intravenous nitrates and loop diuretics doses within the initial 4 h of emergency department presentation and the number of days alive and out of hospital (NDAOH) through 30 days.

Methods: This was an ancillary study of the ELISABETH stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial that included 502 acute heart failure patients 75 years or older in 15 French emergency departments. The primary endpoint was the NDAOH at 30 days. The total dose of intravenous nitrates and loop diuretics administered in the initial 4 h were each categorized into three classes: 'no nitrate', '> 0-16', and '> 16 mg' for nitrates and '< 60', '60', and '> 60 mg' for diuretics. Secondary endpoints included 30-day mortality, 30-day hospital readmission, and hospital length of stay in patients alive at 30 days. Generalized linear mixed models were used to examine associations with the endpoints.

Results: Of 502 patients, the median age was 87 years, with 59% women. The median administered dose within the initial 4 h was 16 mg (5.0; 40.0) for nitrates and 40 mg (40.0; 80.0) for diuretics. The median NDAOH at 30 days was 19 (0.0-24.0). The adjusted ratios of the NDAOH were 0.88 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.63-1.23] and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.58-1.00) for patients that received 60 and > 60 mg, respectively, compared with patients that received 40 mg or less of diuretics. Compared with patients who did not receive nitrates, the adjusted ratios of the NDAOH were 1.17 (95% CI: 0.82-1.67) and 1.45 (95% CI: 0.90-2.33) for patients who received 1-16 and > 16 mg, respectively. There was no significant association with any of the secondary endpoints.

Conclusion: In this ancillary analysis, there was no significant association between different doses of diuretics and nitrates with the NDAOH at 30 days. Point estimates and CIs may suggest that the optimal doses are less than 60 mg of diuretics, and more than 16 mg of nitrates in the first 4 h.

Background and importance: Prolonged emergency medical services' response times (EMS-RT) are associated with poorer outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). The patient access time interval (PATI), from vehicle stop until contact with patient, may be increased in areas with low socioeconomic status (SES).

Objectives: The objective of this study is to identify predictors of prolonged EMS-RT intervals, and to evaluate associations with clinical outcomes in OHCAs occurring in the largest metropolitan area in France.

Design: Using the Utstein-style, prospectively implemented, population-based SDEC registry for OHCAs, we conducted a multicenter, region-wide, retrospective cohort study of EMS dispatches for OHCA cases occurring in the 124 cities of the Greater Paris area, France, between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2018.

Settings and participants: Adult, nontraumatic, EMS-assessed, non-EMS witnessed OHCAs.

Exposure: Geographic location and scene-level SES.

Outcome measures and analysis: The primary outcome was the EMS-RT interval, from activation until arrival at patient's side. As secondary outcomes, we evaluated patient access outcomes of: (1) dispatch-to-patient contact interval ('EMS-RT'); and (2) vehicle scene arrival-to-patient contact interval (PATI); and patient clinical outcomes of: (1) death; and (2) unfavorable neurological status, both at 30 days. Area-level SES was assessed at census tract level using the European Deprivation Index (EDI; continuous, and divided into quintiles, Q5 = most deprived). We fitted multilevel mixed-effects regression models to identify predictors of patient access outcomes, and their association with clinical outcomes.

Main results: We included 4082 cases; the median EMS-RT was 10.85 min (interquartile range [8.87-13.15]), and 138 (3.4%) survived to hospital discharge. Independent predictors of increased EMS-RT and PATI were age >65, female sex, residential location, occurrence at elevated floors, arrest unwitnessed by a bystander, and low EDI (all P < 0.018). After multivariable analysis, an overall EMS-RT interval >8 min was associated with higher mortality and poorer neurological status at hospital discharge (both P < 0.001).

Conclusion: In OHCA cases occurring in the Greater Paris metropolitan area, after adjustment for scene characteristics, EMS delays until patient contact were longer in neighborhoods of low SES, and were associated with poorer clinical outcomes.

Recognizing and prioritizing research areas in emergency care is crucial for generating evidence and advancing research programs, aiming to enhance health outcomes for both individuals and populations. The objective of this review is to document global clinical and nonclinical research priorities. The Emergency Medicine Education and Research by Global Experts network, consisting of 22 sites across six continents, conducted a mapping review of publications on emergency medicine research priorities (2000-2022) across seven databases. We included studies with replicable methodologies for determining research priorities, excluding those limited to individual diseases. Three reviewers independently screened, selected, and categorized results into clinical and nonclinical topics. Discrepancies were resolved by an independent investigator and consensus. Outcomes measures and analysis include descriptive analysis of research priorities grouped into clinical and nonclinical topics, characteristics of publications including countries represented in the author list, target audience (such as researchers or policy makers), participants (e.g. patients), and methods (e.g. Delphi) of priority setting. Among 968 screened papers, 57 publications from all WHO regions were included. Most (36, 63%) had authors from only a single country, primarily in North America and Europe. Patient representatives were included in only 10 (18%). Clinical research priorities clustered into resuscitation, cardiology, central nervous system, emergency medical services, infectious disease, mental health, respiratory disease, and trauma. Distribution was broad in North America and Europe but focused on infectious diseases and resuscitation in Africa and Asia. Eleven nonclinical topics included access to care, health policy, screening/triage, social determinants of health, staffing, technology/simulation, shared decision making, cross-sectoral collaboration, education, patient-centered care, and research networks. Nonclinical topics were broad in Europe and America, focused on access to care and health screening in Africa, and mostly absent in other WHO regions. Published research priorities in emergency medicine are heterogeneous and geographically limited, mostly containing groups of authors from the same country. The majority of publications in global research priority setting stem from Western countries, covering a broad spectrum of clinical and nonclinical topics. Research priorities from Africa and Asia tend to focus on specific issues more prevalent in those regions of the world.

Background and importance: Access to healthcare remains a persistent challenge. Socially disadvantaged populations often encounter barriers to care and may frequently seek out emergency departments (EDs), including for nonurgent medical care.

Objective: The objective of this study is to study the association between nonurgent presentations to pediatric EDs and patients' socioeconomic environment in an urban setting.

Design, setting, and participants: A retrospective study of all visits to a pediatric ED in eight participating centers of the Paris metropolitan area (France) between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2021 was carried out. Routinely collected data were analyzed.

Exposure: Socioeconomic status was evaluated using ecological variables defined at the municipality level. These variables were collected from public sources and included a social deprivation index, the accessibility to general practitioners, the proportion of single-parent families, and the proportion of immigrants.

Outcome measure and analysis: The primary endpoint was a nonurgent ED presentation, defined as being assigned one of the two lowest triage categories on a five-point scale. A multilevel logistic model assessed the association between nonurgent ED presentations and patients' characteristics, socioeconomic environment, and healthcare accessibility.

Main results: Nonurgent visits accounted for 51.6% of the 1 499 108 visits during the study period. The admission rate was 2.1% for nonurgent presentations and 18.8% for urgent presentations. In the final multivariate model (n = 1 412 895 visits), after adjustment for sex, age, time of day, day of the week, month, and year, the risk of nonurgent presentation was significantly higher for children living in less advantaged areas and in areas where the rate of single-parent families was high. It was also higher for children living close to the ED.

Conclusion: This extensive retrospective multicenter study emphasizes the increased risk of visiting EDs for nonurgent medical care among children from disadvantaged urban areas.