Pub Date : 2024-03-20DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107354
Roberto H. Caraballo , Adolfo Gallo , Gabriela Reyes , Giovana Flores , Eugenia Martín , Lenin Intriago , Diego Ballesta
Objective
In this study, we present the electroclinical features and outcomes of 92 patients with epileptic spasms (ES) in clusters without modified or classical hypsarrhythmia that started in either in infancy or in childhood; we compared both groups in terms of electroclinical features, etiology, treatment, evolution, and outcome.
Methods
Between June 2000 and July 2022, 92 patients met the electroclinical diagnostic criteria of ES in clusters without hypsarrhythmia. Patients with ES associated with other epileptic encephalopathies including West Syndrome, as well as those with the specific etiology of ES and developmental and epileptic encephalopathy associated with CDKL5 were excluded.
Results
The patients were divided into two groups based on the age at ES onset: those with ES onset before (Group 1) and those with ES onset after 2 years of age (Group 2). The features of ES and the type of associated seizures before and after ES onset, as well as the interictal and ictal EEG and electromyography findings were similar in both groups. The etiologies were mainly structural (40.2%), genetic (11.9%), and unknown (44.6%) in majority of the patients in both groups. Thirty-one patients were seizure-free, while in the remaining patients the seizures continued. Nine patients (9.8%) with unilateral structural lesions underwent surgery with good results. The neurological abnormalities and developmental findings prior to ES onset depended on the underlying etiology.
Conclusion
Our series of patients may represent a well-defined epileptic syndrome or type of epilepsy with onset in infancy or childhood characterized by ES in clusters without hypsarrhythmia associated with focal and generalized seizures and EEG paroxysms without neurological deterioration.
目的在本研究中,我们介绍了92例始于婴儿期或儿童期、无改良性或经典性心律失常的群集性癫痫痉挛(ES)患者的电临床特征和预后;我们对两组患者的电临床特征、病因、治疗、演变和预后进行了比较。方法在2000年6月至2022年7月期间,92例患者符合无心律失常的群集性癫痫痉挛的电临床诊断标准。结果根据ES发病年龄将患者分为两组:ES发病前(第1组)和ES发病2岁后(第2组)。两组患者的 ES 特征、ES 发病前后的相关发作类型、发作间期和发作期脑电图及肌电图检查结果相似。两组大多数患者的病因主要为结构性(40.2%)、遗传性(11.9%)和不明原因(44.6%)。31 名患者无癫痫发作,其余患者的癫痫发作仍在继续。9名单侧结构性病变患者(9.8%)接受了手术治疗,效果良好。结论:我们的系列患者可能代表了一种定义明确的癫痫综合征或癫痫类型,起病于婴儿期或儿童期,其特点是ES成簇发作,无心律失常,伴局灶性和全身性癫痫发作及脑电图阵发性异常,无神经系统恶化。
{"title":"Epileptic spasms in clusters with hypsarrhythmia in infancy and childhood: A single age-dependent type of epilepsy or well-defined epileptic syndrome?","authors":"Roberto H. Caraballo , Adolfo Gallo , Gabriela Reyes , Giovana Flores , Eugenia Martín , Lenin Intriago , Diego Ballesta","doi":"10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107354","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107354","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>In this study, we present the electroclinical features and outcomes of 92 patients with epileptic spasms (ES) in clusters without modified or classical hypsarrhythmia that started in either in infancy or in childhood; we compared both groups in terms of electroclinical features, etiology, treatment, evolution, and outcome.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Between June 2000 and July 2022, 92 patients met the electroclinical diagnostic criteria of ES in clusters without hypsarrhythmia. Patients with ES associated with other epileptic encephalopathies including West Syndrome, as well as those with the specific etiology of ES and developmental and epileptic encephalopathy associated with <em>CDKL5</em> were excluded.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The patients were divided into two groups based on the age at ES onset: those with ES onset before (Group 1) and those with ES onset after 2 years of age (Group 2). The features of ES and the type of associated seizures before and after ES onset, as well as the interictal and ictal EEG and electromyography findings were similar in both groups. The etiologies were mainly structural (40.2%), genetic (11.9%), and unknown (44.6%) in majority of the patients in both groups. Thirty-one patients were seizure-free, while in the remaining patients the seizures continued. Nine patients (9.8%) with unilateral structural lesions underwent surgery with good results. The neurological abnormalities and developmental findings prior to ES onset depended on the underlying etiology.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our series of patients may represent a well-defined epileptic syndrome or type of epilepsy with onset in infancy or childhood characterized by ES in clusters without hypsarrhythmia associated with focal and generalized seizures and EEG paroxysms without neurological deterioration.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11914,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy Research","volume":"202 ","pages":"Article 107354"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140181422","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-16DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107350
James Wheless , Barry Gidal , Lixin Gong , Shaoqiong Lyu , Xun Zheng , Rong Li , Wilson Chang , Marie Tan
Objectives
Assess the bioequivalence of lacosamide extended-release (XR) capsules and immediate-release (IR) tablets and answer real-world clinical questions regarding the use of lacosamide XR.
Methods
An open-label, randomized, two-treatment, two-sequence, oral comparative bioavailability study was conducted to assess the bioequivalence of two lacosamide formulations. Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive lacosamide XR capsules (400 mg once-daily) or IR tablets (200 mg twice-daily) in 1 of 2 sequences over 7-day periods. Primary outcome was the area under the lacosamide concentration-time curve over 24 h at steady-state (AUC0-τ,ss). Secondary outcomes were maximum (Cmax,ss) and minimum concentrations at steady-state (Cmin,ss). Bioequivalence was established when 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for geometric least square means ratios (GLSMs) were between 80% and 125%. Adverse events (AEs) and other safety outcomes were also assessed. Pharmacokinetic simulations, including adherent and partially adherent dosing scenarios with XR and IR formulations, modeled the clinical use of lacosamide XR.
Results
Thirty-five healthy adult males were enrolled in the bioequivalence study. After 7 days of study drug, mean AUC0-τ,ss, Cmax,ss, and Cmin,ss values were similar between XR and IR formulations; all 90% CIs for GLSMs were between 80% and 125%. AEs were mild and no serious AEs or other clinically significant safety findings were observed. Pharmacokinetic simulations suggested that partial adherence affected formulations similarly; and the best strategy for switching formulations was to take the morning lacosamide IR dose followed by the evening lacosamide XR dose, as this resulted in the most consistent lacosamide plasma concentrations.
Conclusions
Once-daily lacosamide XR capsules were bioequivalent to twice-daily lacosamide IR tablets. Pharmacokinetic simulations indicated lacosamide XR and IR formulations were similarly affected by partial adherence, though once-daily dosing with lacosamide XR may offer clinical advantages, and formulations can be easily switched. These results support the use of lacosamide XR capsules as a once-daily alternative to lacosamide IR tablets.
{"title":"Lacosamide extended-release capsules are bioequivalent to lacosamide immediate-release tablets: Pharmacokinetic observations and simulations","authors":"James Wheless , Barry Gidal , Lixin Gong , Shaoqiong Lyu , Xun Zheng , Rong Li , Wilson Chang , Marie Tan","doi":"10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107350","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107350","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Assess the bioequivalence of lacosamide extended-release (XR) capsules and immediate-release (IR) tablets and answer real-world clinical questions regarding the use of lacosamide XR.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An open-label, randomized, two-treatment, two-sequence, oral comparative bioavailability study was conducted to assess the bioequivalence of two lacosamide formulations. Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive lacosamide XR capsules (400 mg once-daily) or IR tablets (200 mg twice-daily) in 1 of 2 sequences over 7-day periods. Primary outcome was the area under the lacosamide concentration-time curve over 24 h at steady-state (AUC<sub>0-τ,ss</sub>). Secondary outcomes were maximum (C<sub>max,ss</sub>) and minimum concentrations at steady-state (C<sub>min,ss</sub>). Bioequivalence was established when 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for geometric least square means ratios (GLSMs) were between 80% and 125%. Adverse events (AEs) and other safety outcomes were also assessed. Pharmacokinetic simulations, including adherent and partially adherent dosing scenarios with XR and IR formulations, modeled the clinical use of lacosamide XR.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirty-five healthy adult males were enrolled in the bioequivalence study. After 7 days of study drug, mean AUC<sub>0-τ,ss</sub>, C<sub>max,ss</sub>, and C<sub>min,ss</sub> values were similar between XR and IR formulations; all 90% CIs for GLSMs were between 80% and 125%. AEs were mild and no serious AEs or other clinically significant safety findings were observed. Pharmacokinetic simulations suggested that partial adherence affected formulations similarly; and the best strategy for switching formulations was to take the morning lacosamide IR dose followed by the evening lacosamide XR dose, as this resulted in the most consistent lacosamide plasma concentrations.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Once-daily lacosamide XR capsules were bioequivalent to twice-daily lacosamide IR tablets. Pharmacokinetic simulations indicated lacosamide XR and IR formulations were similarly affected by partial adherence, though once-daily dosing with lacosamide XR may offer clinical advantages, and formulations can be easily switched. These results support the use of lacosamide XR capsules as a once-daily alternative to lacosamide IR tablets.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11914,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy Research","volume":"202 ","pages":"Article 107350"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920121124000652/pdfft?md5=fb190ab6bb14e6bdf5eb09f7f8631c55&pid=1-s2.0-S0920121124000652-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140163747","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-12DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107342
Joseph Sullivan , Boudewijn Gunning , Muhammad Zafar , Renzo Guerrini , Jozef Gecz , Kristy L. Kolc , Yufan Zhao , Maciej Gasior , Alex A. Aimetti , Debopam Samanta
{"title":"Corrigendum to “Phase 2, placebo-controlled clinical study of oral ganaxolone in PCDH19-clustering epilepsy” [Epilepsy Res. (2023) 191 107112]","authors":"Joseph Sullivan , Boudewijn Gunning , Muhammad Zafar , Renzo Guerrini , Jozef Gecz , Kristy L. Kolc , Yufan Zhao , Maciej Gasior , Alex A. Aimetti , Debopam Samanta","doi":"10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107342","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107342","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11914,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy Research","volume":"203 ","pages":"Article 107342"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920121124000573/pdfft?md5=ac55579a6836d666c2a3c8e6fd1a545b&pid=1-s2.0-S0920121124000573-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140119174","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-12DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107343
Gabriele Prandin, Giovanni Furlanis, Ilario Scali, Federica Palacino, Laura Mancinelli, Emanuele Vincis, Paola Caruso, Giulia Mazzon, Marinella Tomaselli, Marcello Naccarato, Paolo Manganotti
Background
Convulsive (CSE) and non-convulsive (NCSE) Status Epilepticus are a complication in 0.2–0.3% ischemic strokes. Large stroke and cortical involvement are the main risk factors for developing SE. This study evaluates the prevalence of SE in patients treated with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) through EEG recording within 72- h from admission. Moreover, we compared clinical, radiological, and outcome measures in SE and no-SE patients.
Materials and Methods
We collected retrospectively demographical and clinical characteristics of acute ischemic stroke patients who underwent EVT, admitted in the Stroke Unit (SU) of the University Hospital of Trieste between January 2018 and March 2020 who underwent EEG recording within 72- h from the symptoms’ onset.
Results
Out of 247 EVT patients, 138 met the inclusion criteria, of whom 9 (6.5%) showed SE with median onset time of 1 day (IQR 1–2). No difference was found between the two groups as for age, sex, risk factors, grade of recanalization, etiology of stroke, and closed vessel. The no-SE group presented higher NIHSS improvement rate (p=0.025) compared to the SE group. The sum of the lobes involved in the ischemic lesion was significantly higher in SE group (p=0.048).
Conclusion
SE after EVT in large strokes is a non-rare complication, with most being NCSE. Performing a rapid EEG assessment in a Stroke Unit setting may allow for a prompt recognition and treatment of SE in the acute/hyper-acute phase. SE may be correlated with worse clinical outcomes in patients with large vessel occlusion.
抽搐性(CSE)和非抽搐性(NCSE)癫痫状态是 0.2-0.3% 缺血性脑卒中的并发症之一。大面积脑卒中和皮质受累是发生 SE 的主要风险因素。本研究通过记录入院后 72 小时内的脑电图,评估了接受血管内血栓切除术(EVT)治疗的患者中 SE 的发生率。此外,我们还比较了SE和无SE患者的临床、放射学和疗效指标。我们回顾性地收集了 2018 年 1 月至 2023 年 3 月期间的里雅斯特大学医院卒中科(SU)收治的接受 EVT 的急性缺血性卒中患者的人口统计学和临床特征,这些患者在症状出现后 72 小时内接受了脑电图记录。在 247 名 EVT 患者中,138 人符合纳入标准,其中 9 人(6.5%)出现 SE,中位发病时间为 1 天(IQR 1-2)。两组患者在年龄、性别、风险因素、再通等级、中风病因和闭塞血管方面均无差异。与 SE 组相比,无 SE 组的 NIHSS 改善率更高(P=0.025)。在 SE 组中,岛叶和基底节更常受累(分别为 p=0.01 和 p=0.013)。大面积脑卒中 EVT 后 SE 并非罕见并发症,大多数为 NCSE。在卒中单元环境中进行快速脑电图评估可在急性/超急性期及时识别和治疗 SE。SE 可能与大血管闭塞患者较差的临床预后相关。
{"title":"Status Epilepticus after mechanical thrombectomy: The role of early EEG assessment in Stroke Unit, clinical and radiological prognostication","authors":"Gabriele Prandin, Giovanni Furlanis, Ilario Scali, Federica Palacino, Laura Mancinelli, Emanuele Vincis, Paola Caruso, Giulia Mazzon, Marinella Tomaselli, Marcello Naccarato, Paolo Manganotti","doi":"10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107343","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107343","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Convulsive (CSE) and non-convulsive (NCSE) Status Epilepticus are a complication in 0.2–0.3% ischemic strokes. Large stroke and cortical involvement are the main risk factors for developing SE. This study evaluates the prevalence of SE in patients treated with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) through EEG recording within 72- h from admission. Moreover, we compared clinical, radiological, and outcome measures in SE and no-SE patients.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>We collected retrospectively demographical and clinical characteristics of acute ischemic stroke patients who underwent EVT, admitted in the Stroke Unit (SU) of the University Hospital of Trieste between January 2018 and March 2020 who underwent EEG recording within 72- h from the symptoms’ onset.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Out of 247 EVT patients, 138 met the inclusion criteria, of whom 9 (6.5%) showed SE with median onset time of 1 day (IQR 1–2). No difference was found between the two groups as for age, sex, risk factors, grade of recanalization, etiology of stroke, and closed vessel. The no-SE group presented higher NIHSS improvement rate (p=0.025) compared to the SE group. The sum of the lobes involved in the ischemic lesion was significantly higher in SE group (p=0.048).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>SE after EVT in large strokes is a non-rare complication, with most being NCSE. Performing a rapid EEG assessment in a Stroke Unit setting may allow for a prompt recognition and treatment of SE in the acute/hyper-acute phase. SE may be correlated with worse clinical outcomes in patients with large vessel occlusion.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11914,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy Research","volume":"202 ","pages":"Article 107343"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140127133","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-02DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107339
Norman Delanty , Rajiv Mohanraj , Rohit Shankar , Tim Wehner , Linda J. Stephen , Wendyl D’Souza , Sheri Cappucci , Rob McMurray , Ricardo Sainz-Fuertes , Vicente Villanueva
Genetic factors contribute to the aetiology of epilepsy in >50% of cases, and information on the use of antiseizure medications in people with specific aetiologies will help guide treatment decisions. The PERMIT Extension study pooled data from two real-world studies (PERMIT and PROVE) to investigate the effectiveness and safety/tolerability of perampanel (PER) when used to treat people with focal and generalised epilepsy in everyday clinical practice. This post-hoc analysis of PERMIT Extension explored the use of PER when used to treat individuals presumed to have epilepsy with a genetic aetiology. Assessments included retention rate (evaluated at 3, 6 and 12 months), effectiveness (responder and seizure freedom rates; evaluated at 3, 6, 12 months and the last visit [last observation carried forward) and tolerability (adverse events [AEs]). Of the 6822 people with epilepsy included in PERMIT Extension, 1012 were presumed to have a genetic aetiology. The most common genetic aetiologies were idiopathic generalised epilepsy (IGE; 58.2%), tuberous sclerosis (1.1%), Dravet syndrome (0.8%) and genetic epilepsy with febrile seizures plus (GEFS+; 0.5%). Retention rates at 3, 6 and 12 months in the total genetic aetiology population were 89.3%, 79.7% and 65.9%, respectively. In the total genetic aetiology population, responder rates at 12 months and the last visit were 74.8% and 68.3%, respectively, and corresponding seizure freedom rates were 48.9% and 46.5%, respectively. For the specific aetiology subgroups, responder rates at 12 months and the last visit were, respectively: 90.4% and 84.4% (IGE), 100% and 57.1% (tuberous sclerosis), 100% and 71.4% (Dravet syndrome), and 33.3% and 20.0% (GEFS+). Corresponding seizure freedom rates were, respectively: 73.1% and 64.6% (IGE), 33.3% and 22.2% (tuberous sclerosis), 20.0% and 28.6% (Dravet syndrome), and 0% and 0% (GEFS+). The incidence of AEs was 46.5% for the total genetic aetiology population, 48.8% for IGE, 27.3% for tuberous sclerosis, 62.5% for Dravet syndrome, and 20% for GEFS+. Tolerability findings were consistent with PER’s known safety profile. PER was effective and generally well tolerated when used in individuals with a presumed genetic epilepsy aetiology in clinical practice. PER was effective across a wide range of genetic aetiologies.
{"title":"Perampanel for the treatment of epilepsy with genetic aetiology: Real-world evidence from the PERMIT Extension study","authors":"Norman Delanty , Rajiv Mohanraj , Rohit Shankar , Tim Wehner , Linda J. Stephen , Wendyl D’Souza , Sheri Cappucci , Rob McMurray , Ricardo Sainz-Fuertes , Vicente Villanueva","doi":"10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107339","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107339","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Genetic factors contribute to the aetiology of epilepsy in >50% of cases, and information on the use of antiseizure medications in people with specific aetiologies will help guide treatment decisions. The PERMIT Extension study pooled data from two real-world studies (PERMIT and PROVE) to investigate the effectiveness and safety/tolerability of perampanel (PER) when used to treat people with focal and generalised epilepsy in everyday clinical practice. This <em>post-hoc</em> analysis of PERMIT Extension explored the use of PER when used to treat individuals presumed to have epilepsy with a genetic aetiology. Assessments included retention rate (evaluated at 3, 6 and 12 months), effectiveness (responder and seizure freedom rates; evaluated at 3, 6, 12 months and the last visit [last observation carried forward) and tolerability (adverse events [AEs]). Of the 6822 people with epilepsy included in PERMIT Extension, 1012 were presumed to have a genetic aetiology. The most common genetic aetiologies were idiopathic generalised epilepsy (IGE; 58.2%), tuberous sclerosis (1.1%), Dravet syndrome (0.8%) and genetic epilepsy with febrile seizures plus (GEFS+; 0.5%). Retention rates at 3, 6 and 12 months in the total genetic aetiology population were 89.3%, 79.7% and 65.9%, respectively. In the total genetic aetiology population, responder rates at 12 months and the last visit were 74.8% and 68.3%, respectively, and corresponding seizure freedom rates were 48.9% and 46.5%, respectively. For the specific aetiology subgroups, responder rates at 12 months and the last visit were, respectively: 90.4% and 84.4% (IGE), 100% and 57.1% (tuberous sclerosis), 100% and 71.4% (Dravet syndrome), and 33.3% and 20.0% (GEFS+). Corresponding seizure freedom rates were, respectively: 73.1% and 64.6% (IGE), 33.3% and 22.2% (tuberous sclerosis), 20.0% and 28.6% (Dravet syndrome), and 0% and 0% (GEFS+). The incidence of AEs was 46.5% for the total genetic aetiology population, 48.8% for IGE, 27.3% for tuberous sclerosis, 62.5% for Dravet syndrome, and 20% for GEFS+. Tolerability findings were consistent with PER’s known safety profile. PER was effective and generally well tolerated when used in individuals with a presumed genetic epilepsy aetiology in clinical practice. PER was effective across a wide range of genetic aetiologies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11914,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy Research","volume":"202 ","pages":"Article 107339"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920121124000548/pdfft?md5=f34c596583c2f386a6f655318da74a1e&pid=1-s2.0-S0920121124000548-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140045993","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-02DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107336
Julien Hébert , Robert J. De Santis , Lubna Daniyal , Shabber Mannan , Eduardo Ng , Emily Thain , Maria Carolina Sanabria-Salas , Raymond H. Kim , Vera Bril , Aylin Y. Reid
Purpose
Studies have shown an increased risk of epilepsy in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). However, most reports focus on the pediatric population. In this study, we describe the trajectory of patients with NF1 and epilepsy beyond childhood.
Methods
Patients with NF1 ≥18 years-old consecutively seen at a multidisciplinary neurofibromatosis clinic during a four-year period were prospectively enrolled and offered routine EEG, MRI, and genetic testing. The lifelong and point prevalence of epilepsy in patients with NF1 were calculated. Demographic, genetic, radiological, and clinical features found to be statistically associated with having received a diagnosis of epilepsy were incorporated into a logistic regression model.
Results
Among 113 patients with NF1 included in this study (median age at study inclusion: 33 years), the lifelong prevalence of epilepsy was 11% (CI95%=6–18%) and point prevalence 7% (CI95%= 3–13%). Most patients (73%) were diagnosed with epilepsy before the age of 18 and achieved seizure-freedom by adulthood. At study inclusion, three-quarters of patients with a diagnosis of epilepsy had been seizure-free for more than one year and a third had resolved epilepsy. A routine EEG with epileptiform discharges had a sensitivity of 25% (CI95%=3–65) and specificity of 99% (CI95%=93–100) for identifying adult patients with NF1 and unresolved epilepsy. A history of epilepsy was associated with having a low-grade glioma (OR: 38.2; CI95%=2.2–674.7; p<0.01), learning disability (OR: 5.7; CI95%=1.0–31.5; p<0.05), and no plexiform neurofibroma (OR: 0.05; CI95%=0.0–0.8; p=0.04). No single mutation type was associated with the development of epilepsy.
Conclusions
In patients with NF1, although resolution of epilepsy over time was observed in many cases, the prevalence of epilepsy was higher among adults with NF1 than that reported in the general population. Epileptogenesis in NF1 likely requires the combination of multiple genetic and environmental factors and suggests involvement of a network that spreads beyond the borders of a well-defined parenchymal lesion.
{"title":"Epilepsy in neurofibromatosis type 1: Prevalence, phenotype, and genotype in adults","authors":"Julien Hébert , Robert J. De Santis , Lubna Daniyal , Shabber Mannan , Eduardo Ng , Emily Thain , Maria Carolina Sanabria-Salas , Raymond H. Kim , Vera Bril , Aylin Y. Reid","doi":"10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107336","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107336","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Studies have shown an increased risk of epilepsy in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). However, most reports focus on the pediatric population. In this study, we describe the trajectory of patients with NF1 and epilepsy beyond childhood.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients with NF1 ≥18 years-old consecutively seen at a multidisciplinary neurofibromatosis clinic during a four-year period were prospectively enrolled and offered routine EEG, MRI, and genetic testing. The <em>lifelong</em> and <em>point</em> prevalence of epilepsy in patients with NF1 were calculated. Demographic, genetic, radiological, and clinical features found to be statistically associated with having received a diagnosis of epilepsy were incorporated into a logistic regression model.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 113 patients with NF1 included in this study (median age at study inclusion: 33 years), the lifelong prevalence of epilepsy was 11% (CI<sub>95%</sub>=6–18%) and point prevalence 7% (CI<sub>95%</sub>= 3–13%). Most patients (73%) were diagnosed with epilepsy before the age of 18 and achieved seizure-freedom by adulthood. At study inclusion, three-quarters of patients with a diagnosis of epilepsy had been seizure-free for more than one year and a third had resolved epilepsy. A routine EEG with epileptiform discharges had a sensitivity of 25% (CI<sub>95%</sub>=3–65) and specificity of 99% (CI<sub>95%</sub>=93–100) for identifying adult patients with NF1 and unresolved epilepsy. A history of epilepsy was associated with having a low-grade glioma (OR: 38.2; CI<sub>95%</sub>=2.2–674.7; p<0.01), learning disability (OR: 5.7; CI<sub>95%</sub>=1.0–31.5; p<0.05), and no plexiform neurofibroma (OR: 0.05; CI<sub>95%</sub>=0.0–0.8; p=0.04). No single mutation type was associated with the development of epilepsy.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In patients with NF1, although resolution of epilepsy over time was observed in many cases, the prevalence of epilepsy was higher among adults with NF1 than that reported in the general population. Epileptogenesis in NF1 likely requires the combination of multiple genetic and environmental factors and suggests involvement of a network that spreads beyond the borders of a well-defined parenchymal lesion.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11914,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy Research","volume":"202 ","pages":"Article 107336"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920121124000512/pdfft?md5=8c7b9be2b2857579dbdc531a58149b05&pid=1-s2.0-S0920121124000512-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140046213","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107341
Alfiya Fasaludeen , Amy McTague , Manna Jose , Moinak Banerjee , Soumya Sundaram , U.K. Madhusoodanan , Ashalatha Radhakrishnan , Ramshekhar N. Menon
Genetic advances over the past decade have enhanced our understanding of the genetic landscape of childhood epilepsy. However a major challenge for clinicians ha been understanding the rationale and systematic approach towards interpretation of the clinical significance of variant(s) detected in their patients. As the clinical paradigm evolves from gene panels to whole exome or whole genome testing including rapid genome sequencing, the number of patients tested and variants identified per patient will only increase. Each step in the process of variant interpretation has limitations and there is no single criterion which enables the clinician to draw reliable conclusions on a causal relationship between the variant and disease without robust clinical phenotyping. Although many automated online analysis software tools are available, these carry a risk of misinterpretation. This guideline provides a pragmatic, real-world approach to variant interpretation for the child neurologist. The focus will be on ascertaining aspects such as variant frequency, subtype, inheritance pattern, structural and functional consequence with regard to genotype-phenotype correlations, while refraining from mere interpretation of the classification provided in a genetic test report. It will not replace the expert advice of colleagues in clinical genetics, however as genomic investigations become a first-line test for epilepsy, it is vital that neurologists and epileptologists are equipped to navigate this landscape.
{"title":"Genetic variant interpretation for the neurologist – A pragmatic approach in the next-generation sequencing era in childhood epilepsy","authors":"Alfiya Fasaludeen , Amy McTague , Manna Jose , Moinak Banerjee , Soumya Sundaram , U.K. Madhusoodanan , Ashalatha Radhakrishnan , Ramshekhar N. Menon","doi":"10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107341","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107341","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Genetic advances over the past decade have enhanced our understanding of the genetic landscape of childhood epilepsy. However a major challenge for clinicians ha been understanding the rationale and systematic approach towards interpretation of the clinical significance of variant(s) detected in their patients. As the clinical paradigm evolves from gene panels to whole exome or whole genome testing including rapid genome sequencing, the number of patients tested and variants identified per patient will only increase. Each step in the process of variant interpretation has limitations and there is no single criterion which enables the clinician to draw reliable conclusions on a causal relationship between the variant and disease without robust clinical phenotyping. Although many automated online analysis software tools are available, these carry a risk of misinterpretation. This guideline provides a pragmatic, real-world approach to variant interpretation for the child neurologist. The focus will be on ascertaining aspects such as variant frequency, subtype, inheritance pattern, structural and functional consequence with regard to genotype-phenotype correlations, while refraining from mere interpretation of the classification provided in a genetic test report. It will not replace the expert advice of colleagues in clinical genetics, however as genomic investigations become a first-line test for epilepsy, it is vital that neurologists and epileptologists are equipped to navigate this landscape.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11914,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy Research","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 107341"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140042511","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107334
K. Komal , F. Cleary , J.S.G. Wells , L. Bennett
Background
Early detection and alert notification of an impending seizure for people with epilepsy have the potential to reduce Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP). Current remote monitoring seizure detection devices for people with epilepsy are designed to support real-time monitoring of their vital health parameters linked to seizure alert notification. An understanding of the rapidly growing literature on remote seizure detection devices is essential to address the needs of people with epilepsy and their carers.
Aim
This review aims to examine the technical characteristics, device performance, user preference, and effectiveness of remote monitoring seizure detection devices.
Methodology
A systematic review referenced to PRISMA guidelines was used.
Results
A total of 1095 papers were identified from the initial search with 30 papers included in the review. Sixteen non-invasive remote monitoring seizure detection devices are currently available. Such seizure detection devices were found to have inbuilt intelligent sensor functionality to monitor electroencephalography, muscle movement, and accelerometer-based motion movement for detecting seizures remotely. Current challenges of these devices for people with epilepsy include skin irritation due to the type of patch electrode used and false alarm notifications, particularly during physical activity. The tight-fitted accelerometer-type devices are reported as uncomfortable from a wearability perspective for long-term monitoring. Also, continuous recording of physiological signals and triggering alert notifications significantly reduce the battery life of the devices. The literature highlights that 3.2 out of 5 people with epilepsy are not using seizure detection devices because of the cost and appearance of the device.
Conclusion
Seizure detection devices can potentially reduce morbidity and mortality for people with epilepsy. Therefore, further collaboration of clinicians, technical experts, and researchers is needed for the future development of these devices. Finally, it is important to always take into consideration the expectations and requirements of people with epilepsy and their carers to facilitate the next generation of remote monitoring seizure detection devices.
{"title":"A systematic review of the literature reporting on remote monitoring epileptic seizure detection devices","authors":"K. Komal , F. Cleary , J.S.G. Wells , L. Bennett","doi":"10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107334","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107334","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Early detection and alert notification of an impending seizure for people with epilepsy have the potential to reduce Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP). Current remote monitoring seizure detection devices for people with epilepsy are designed to support real-time monitoring of their vital health parameters linked to seizure alert notification. An understanding of the rapidly growing literature on remote seizure detection devices is essential to address the needs of people with epilepsy and their carers.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>This review aims to examine the technical characteristics, device performance, user preference, and effectiveness of remote monitoring seizure detection devices.</p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>A systematic review referenced to PRISMA guidelines was used.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 1095 papers were identified from the initial search with 30 papers included in the review. Sixteen non-invasive remote monitoring seizure detection devices are currently available. Such seizure detection devices were found to have inbuilt intelligent sensor functionality to monitor electroencephalography, muscle movement, and accelerometer-based motion movement for detecting seizures remotely. Current challenges of these devices for people with epilepsy include skin irritation due to the type of patch electrode used and false alarm notifications, particularly during physical activity. The tight-fitted accelerometer-type devices are reported as uncomfortable from a wearability perspective for long-term monitoring. Also, continuous recording of physiological signals and triggering alert notifications significantly reduce the battery life of the devices. The literature highlights that 3.2 out of 5 people with epilepsy are not using seizure detection devices because of the cost and appearance of the device.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Seizure detection devices can potentially reduce morbidity and mortality for people with epilepsy. Therefore, further collaboration of clinicians, technical experts, and researchers is needed for the future development of these devices. Finally, it is important to always take into consideration the expectations and requirements of people with epilepsy and their carers to facilitate the next generation of remote monitoring seizure detection devices.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11914,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy Research","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 107334"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140003385","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107340
Jonah Fox , Madelyn K. Bollig , Murli Mishra , Monica Jacobs
Introduction
Neuropsychological testing is a mandatory component in the evaluation of drug resistant epilepsy. The results of testing may assist with both the localization of an epilepsy as well as assessment of surgical risk. Previous studies have demonstrated differences in the neuropsychological performance of patients with epilepsy and functional seizures. We hypothesized that comorbid functional seizures could potentially influence neuropsychological test performance. Therefore, we evaluated whether there is a difference in the neuropsychological test results between drug resistant epilepsy patients with and without comorbid functional seizures.
Method
Neuropsychological test results were compared between 25 patients with drug resistant focal epilepsy and 25 patients that also had documented functional seizures. Univariate analyses and multiple logistic regression models were used to both assess performance differences between the groups and to assess whether test results could be used to accurately identify which patients had comorbid functional seizures.
Results
Epilepsy patients with comorbid functional seizures performed significantly worse on the FAS Verbal Fluency Test compared to ES patients (p = 0.047). Digit Span Backwards (p = 0.10), Digit Span Forwards (p = 0.14) and Working Memory Index (p = 0.10) tended to be lower in the epilepsy and functional seizures group but was not statistically significant. A multiple logistic regression model using the results of four neuropsychological tests was able to identify patients with comorbid functional seizures with 83.33% accuracy.
Conclusions
There are appeared to be some differences in the neuropsychological performance among drug resistant epilepsy patients based on whether they have comorbid functional seizures. These findings may have relevant implications for the interpretation of neuropsychological test results.
{"title":"Neuropsychological characteristics of drug resistant epilepsy patients with and without comorbid functional seizures","authors":"Jonah Fox , Madelyn K. Bollig , Murli Mishra , Monica Jacobs","doi":"10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107340","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107340","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Neuropsychological testing is a mandatory component in the evaluation of drug resistant epilepsy. The results of testing may assist with both the localization of an epilepsy as well as assessment of surgical risk. Previous studies have demonstrated differences in the neuropsychological performance of patients with epilepsy and functional seizures. We hypothesized that comorbid functional seizures could potentially influence neuropsychological test performance. Therefore, we evaluated whether there is a difference in the neuropsychological test results between drug resistant epilepsy patients with and without comorbid functional seizures.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Neuropsychological test results were compared between 25 patients with drug resistant focal epilepsy and 25 patients that also had documented functional seizures. Univariate analyses and multiple logistic regression models were used to both assess performance differences between the groups and to assess whether test results could be used to accurately identify which patients had comorbid functional seizures.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Epilepsy patients with comorbid functional seizures performed significantly worse on the FAS Verbal Fluency Test compared to ES patients (p = 0.047). Digit Span Backwards (p = 0.10), Digit Span Forwards (p = 0.14) and Working Memory Index (p = 0.10) tended to be lower in the epilepsy and functional seizures group but was not statistically significant. A multiple logistic regression model using the results of four neuropsychological tests was able to identify patients with comorbid functional seizures with 83.33% accuracy.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>There are appeared to be some differences in the neuropsychological performance among drug resistant epilepsy patients based on whether they have comorbid functional seizures. These findings may have relevant implications for the interpretation of neuropsychological test results.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11914,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy Research","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 107340"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092012112400055X/pdfft?md5=05a90271b7927bbd172b2e2248ccd31f&pid=1-s2.0-S092012112400055X-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140024350","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107337
Anthony R. Fringuello , Robert Colbourn , Jeffrey H. Goodman , Hillary B. Michelson , Douglas S.F. Ling , Sabina Hrabetova
Post traumatic epilepsy (PTE) is a treatment-resistant consequence of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Recently, it has been revealed that epileptiform activity in acute chemoconvulsant seizure models is accompanied by transient shrinkages of extracellular space (ECS) called rapid volume pulsations (RVPs). Shrinkage of the ECS surrounding neurons and glia may contribute to ictogenic hyperexcitability and hypersynchrony during the chronic phase of TBI. Here, we identify the phenomenon of RVPs occurring spontaneously in rat neocortex at ≥ 3 weeks after injury in the controlled cortical impact (CCI) model for PTE. We further report that blocking the electrogenic action of the astrocytic cotransporter NBCe1 with 4,4′-diisothiocyano-2,2′-stilbenedisulfonic acid (DIDS) eliminates both RVPs and epileptiform activity in ex-vivo CCI neocortical brain slices. We conclude that NBCe1-mediated extracellular volume shrinkage may represent a new target for therapeutic intervention in PTE.
{"title":"Rapid volume pulsations of the extracellular space accompany epileptiform activity in trauma-injured neocortex and depend on the sodium-bicarbonate cotransporter NBCe1","authors":"Anthony R. Fringuello , Robert Colbourn , Jeffrey H. Goodman , Hillary B. Michelson , Douglas S.F. Ling , Sabina Hrabetova","doi":"10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107337","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107337","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Post traumatic epilepsy (PTE) is a treatment-resistant consequence of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Recently, it has been revealed that epileptiform activity in acute chemoconvulsant seizure models is accompanied by transient shrinkages of extracellular space (ECS) called rapid volume pulsations (RVPs). Shrinkage of the ECS surrounding neurons and glia may contribute to ictogenic hyperexcitability and hypersynchrony during the chronic phase of TBI. Here, we identify the phenomenon of RVPs occurring spontaneously in rat neocortex at ≥ 3 weeks after injury in the controlled cortical impact (CCI) model for PTE. We further report that blocking the electrogenic action of the astrocytic cotransporter NBCe1 with 4,4′-diisothiocyano-2,2′-stilbenedisulfonic acid (DIDS) eliminates both RVPs and epileptiform activity in ex-vivo CCI neocortical brain slices. We conclude that NBCe1-mediated extracellular volume shrinkage may represent a new target for therapeutic intervention in PTE.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11914,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy Research","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 107337"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140046169","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}