European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy最新文献

Aims: To assess the comparative cardiovascular and renal effectiveness and safety of empagliflozin vs. dapagliflozin among patients with type 2 diabetes in routine clinical practice.

Methods and results: Cohort study using data from nationwide registers in Sweden, Denmark, and Norway, from June 2014 to June 2021 included 141 065 new users of empagliflozin and 58 306 new users of dapagliflozin. Coprimary outcomes were major cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular death), heart failure (hospitalization or death because of heart failure) and serious renal events (renal replacement therapy, hospitalization for renal events, and death from renal causes). Secondary outcomes were the individual components of the primary outcomes, any cause death, and diabetic ketoacidosis. Use of empagliflozin vs. dapagliflozin was associated with similar risk of major cardiovascular events [adjusted incidence rate: 15.9 vs. 15.8 events per 1000 person-years; HR 1.02, (95% confidence interval 0.97-1.08)], heart failure [6.5 vs. 6.3 events per 1000 person-years; HR 1.05 (0.97-1.14)] and serious renal events [3.7 vs. 4.1 events per 1000 person-years; HR 0.97 (0.87-1.07)]. In secondary outcome analyses, the HRs for use of empagliflozin vs. dapagliflozin were 1.00 (0.93-1.07) for myocardial infarction, 1.03 (0.95-1.12) for stroke, 1.01 (0.92-1.13) for cardiovascular death, 1.06 (1.00-1.11) for any cause death, 0.77 (0.60-0.99) for renal replacement therapy, 1.20 (0.75-1.93) for renal death, 1.01 (0.90-1.12) for hospitalization for renal events and 1.12 (0.94-1.33) for diabetic ketoacidosis.

Conclusion: Use of empagliflozin and dapagliflozin was associated with similar risk of cardiovascular and renal outcomes, mortality, and diabetic ketoacidosis.

Aims: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) impair cardiac repolarization, prolong the QT interval, and may potentially be pro-arrhythmic. However, the risk of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is scarcely investigated. We studied whether past or current PPI use is associated with OHCA in the general population.

Methods and results: We conducted a nationwide nested case-control study with OHCA-cases of presumed cardiac causes and age/sex/OHCA-date-matched non-OHCA-controls from the general population. Exposure to PPI was categorized into three mutually exclusive groups of current-, past-, and non-use. Conditional logistic regression analyses with adjustments for risk factors of OHCA were used to calculate the odds ratio (OR) of OHCA comparing PPI use with non-users. We identified 46 578 OHCA cases and 232 890 matched non-OHCA controls (mean: 71 years, 68.8% men). PPI was used by 8769 OHCA-cases and 21 898 non-OHCA controls, and current use of PPI was associated with increased odds of OHCA compared with non-users [OR: 1.32 (95% CI: 1.28-1.37)], while past use conferred no increase in the odds of OHCA [OR: 1.01 (95% CI: 0.98-1.04)]. This increased odds of OHCA occurred in both sexes. Finally, the ORs remained elevated when we repeated the analyses in individuals without registered ischaemic heart disease [OR: 1.36 (95% CI: 1.31-1.41)], without heart failure [OR: 1.33 (95% CI: 1.29-1.38)], or without any cardiovascular comorbidities [OR: 1.84 (95% CI: 1.70-2.00)]. Also, the OR remained elevated when H2-antagonists served as the reference group [OR: 1.28 (95% CI: 1.11-1.47)].

Conclusion: PPI use is associated with an increased risk of OHCA in the general population. Considering the widespread use of PPIs, this study raises concerns and the need for awareness to balance the benefit and risk of treatment.

Background: The ONCO DVT study revealed the superiority of 12-month relative to 3-month edoxaban treatment for cancer-associated isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) regarding the thrombotic risk.

Methods and results: In this pre-specified subgroup analysis of the ONCO DVT study, we stratified the patients into those with a standard edoxaban dose (60 mg/day; N = 151) and those with a reduced edoxaban dose (30 mg/day; N = 450) and evaluated the clinical outcomes for the 12- and 3-month treatments. The cumulative 12-month incidence of symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism was lower in the 12-month than 3-month group for both the 60 mg (1.3% vs. 11.6%, P = 0.02; odds ratio [OR], 0.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01-0.97) and 30 mg (1.1% vs. 7.6%, P = 0.002; OR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.03-0.60) edoxaban subgroups, which was consistent across the edoxaban doses without a significant interaction (P = 0.90). The 12-month cumulative incidence of major bleeding was higher in the 12-month group than in the 3-month group for the 60 mg edoxaban subgroup (14.3% vs. 4.4%, P = 0.046; OR, 3.61; 95% CI, 0.97-13.52), whereas it did not significantly differ between the two groups for the 30 mg edoxaban subgroup (8.7% vs. 8.6%, P = 0.89; OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.49-1.91), signalling there was a potential interaction (P = 0.07).

Conclusions: A 12-month edoxaban regimen for cancer-associated isolated distal DVT was consistently superior to a 3-month regimen, across the edoxaban doses for the thrombotic risk. However, caution was suggested for the standard dose of edoxaban due to the potential for an increased risk of bleeding with prolonged anticoagulation therapy.

Trial registration number: NCT03895502 (ONCO DVT Trial): https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03895502.

Aims: The optimal antithrombotic therapy to balance the risk of thrombosis and bleeding in patients who undergo transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is unknown. This systematic review/network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different oral anticoagulant (OAC) and antiplatelet regimens in patients post-TAVI.

Methods and results: MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to April 2023. Co-primary outcomes were all-cause death and major bleeding. We conducted Bayesian network meta-analyses to compare all interventions simultaneously. For each outcome, we generated odds ratios (ORs) with 95% credible intervals using a random-effects model with informative priors, and ranked interventions based on mean surface under the cumulative ranking curve. We included 11 RCTs (n = 6415), including 1 unpublished RCT. Three trials enrolled patients with an indication for an OAC. Overall risk of bias was low or with some concerns. Median age was 81 years. Median follow-up was 6 months. The combination of OAC plus single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) increased the risk of all-cause death compared with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) (OR 1.78, 95% credible interval 1.15-2.77). No other comparisons for all-cause death were significantly different. For major bleeding, SAPT reduced the risk compared with DAPT, direct-acting OAC, and OAC + SAPT (OR 0.20-0.40), and DAPT reduced the risk compared with OAC + SAPT. SAPT and DAPT ranked best for all-cause death, while SAPT ranked best for major bleeding.

Conclusion: In post-TAVI patients, SAPT may provide the optimal balance of reducing thrombotic events while minimizing the risk of bleeding.

Aims: Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors (PDE5i), which are widely used for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED), have been found to exhibit systemic vascular benefits by improving endothelial function. In this context, we sought to evaluate the effects of PDE5i on long-term cardiovascular outcomes and mortality.

Methods and results: A comprehensive search of electronic databases was conducted up to 30 May 2023. Cohort studies comparing PDE5i treatment at any dose with other ED treatment, placebo or no treatment and minimum follow-up duration of 6 months were considered eligible. The primary endpoints were: (1) major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and (2) all-cause mortality. Pooled risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Sixteen studies were included (1 257 759 subjects-10.5% treated with PDE5i). The majority of patients (99.4%) were men [median age 61.5 years (range 30-72.8)]. The median follow-up duration was 4.3 years (range 6 months-7.5 years). PDE5i use was associated with a significant reduction in the composite of MACE (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.69-0.89). Moreover, the analysis of pooled data from 13 studies, demonstrated that the use of PDE5i was associated with a significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.56-0.87).

Conclusion: The use of PDE5i primarily in men with or without known coronary artery disease was associated with a lower risk for cardiovascular events and overall mortality. This information underlines that PDE5i could provide clinical benefit beyond ED treatment and could instigate the conduction of further, large-scale randomized clinical trials.